Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
But prior the commons will be diluted, PPS could be up to $1.80-$2 in 2024. It means, a to make a decent profit .
Let's wait until Tuesday: Volume 15 M is uncommon for PUMP and DUMP case,but there is no guarantee
that PPS would not drop.
PUMP and DUMP scenario has the following features: executed within 3-4 bussiness days, and has a volume of 3-4 M.
Today's volume would be around 15 M. And this volume usually means,that there are some news.
But at the same time, it could be that PUMP and DUMP guys circle expended. And if this is true, we will see it later today or late Tuesday.
Last 20 min of the trade time would reveal if it's PUMP and DUMP case or something different
Today's trades are different from the PUMP and DUMP scenario being executed. It's a volume,that by the end of the day would be 13-14 M.
It's around 3-3.5 M for a PUMP and DUMP case. Let's wait and see what would happened by the end of the day.
Lamber does what he is requested to do. This is the reason, why he still keeps his job at 78.
Could anybody name at least one delay, plaintiffs team did not agreed upon since 2013 when this court started? There are no such delays. None.
What a shame!!!. I think everybody would agree, that All of the members of the plaintiffs team should not be paid at All.
If Plaintiffs team members would be employed by Any financial company, members of this team would be fired on a spot. They are not only not deserved to be paid at All, but their licenses should be revoked.
If anybody cares of interest, it's only shareholders. It means, prejudgement interest table could be extended to the date of April 30, 2024.At minimum.Good luck to All.
Don't be so naive. It's obvious,that we cannot expect him to do something,only delays.
Even if All of the below mentioned dates would be met, it would take lamber another two-three month to finalize it. And it means, end of March or end of April 2024.
Good luck to All. Be happy.But FMCC commons shareholders are already happy,since their rewards
anyway are peanuts.
It would take another week for Lamber to issue his statement. My guess, that final decision couldn't be expected prior to the end of March. Lamber just makes this case to last forever. He is a magician.
It's interesting to know, if his removal news of Colorado lists would have any impact on FNMA/FMCC
In 2021 FNMA and FMCC conservatorship ending item was removed off the FHFA 2022-2026 business plan. End of story.
Donotunderstand,replying to our question: FNMA stock is under control including its current PPS. Or You think PPS $0.70 of two most profitable companies appears for no reason. The same apply to an attempt to discourage shareholders and to make them to sell FNMA/FMCC shares. The same apply to lamber. Think about it. .
21st of December would easily become 21st of March,or possibly April or May. Lamber is a magician.
Everything is done to discourage investors, even at this board, and this is a result of it.
There are a lot of not shareholders here,but rather people,that are on assignment to discourage sharehoders.But let's wait until November 2024, and the picture will be totally different.
FNMA/FMCC investors are doomed for the last 15 years, a lot of them passed away. Market is up,but FNMA shareholders still at $0.70. Sad story.
I've already responded, that for F and F DJT is the best choice. And currently DJT has 60% of GOP support.
In regards to Haley, by March 2024 would be obvious if she has a chance at All. I'm not trying to promote anybody,just trying to stick to the facts.
DJT is the best choice for F and F to be released.
GOP would win: DJT or Haley
To All that are here on assignment: we will have a real fun in November 2024, when our candidate would win.
Bernie Madoff victims were recognized as victims from the Day1, but F and F sharehoders are not.
In 2021 FHFA management included FNMA/FMCC release on a draft of 2022-2026 business plan, but Treasury removed it off this Business plan.
FHFA 2022-2026 business plan was approved by Treasury later in 2021. It means,only Treasury makes final decisions, and FHFA is just a subordinate entity.
Yes, I would vote POTUS and make decision by November based on F and F, policies, personalities, priorities of the various candidates.
DJT could be the best for F and F, but overall looks like Haley is better than the other candidates(at least smarter, and has both domestic and international experience).
Haley is not an ideal candidate,but if compare to other candidates,she looks more balanced.
My guess,no change in PPS would occurred until August 2024, and if GOP win in 2024, PPS would go up at least 30%-40%. And for sure it wouldn't be Mnuchin and Calabria. At least shareholders have a chance.
Again,I do not envision PPS at $10, but $1.30-1.80 range in January-February of 2025 is quite possible.
Next time if GOP win(2024), PPS would go up at least 30%. And for sure it wouldn't be Mnuchin and Calabria. At least shareholders have a chance.
Again,I do not envision PPS at $10, but $1.30-1.60 range in January-February of 2025 is quite possible.
Expand to 14 months. Different story
Only 2024 GOP win could possibly change shareholders status. Everything else is just useless conversations and no actions at All. Even August jury decision haven't change anything so far.
Court delays directly impact FNMA/FMCC PPS. It doesn't mean, that PPS will jump a lot,but modest 20%-30% still possible.
The same tactics of delays used for the past 12 years,but the plaintiffs team 100% agree on All of the delays. Even the best fiction writers wouldn't envision such absurd. What a disgrace!
15 years of FNMA/FMCC shareholders demise, total number of individual shareholders in 2012 - 12000, as of 2022 - 8000. A lot of shareholders already passed away. It's not about politics,it's about human's life and shareholders abuse. What a shame.
It's just the opposite,defendants do not agree with the plaintiff's distribution plan and just looking for another 3-5 month delay.
This case is not the first one, that utilize the Delaware Law. Any qualified judge would summon both teams and give them 10 days to resolve distribution issue and would not allow any delays(see the comments below).
On November 17th plaintiffs provided a plan how to distribute money via finance/brokerage companies. Lamber going circles, because he is afraid to take some additional steps (schedule plaintiffs and defendants teams meeting) in order to resolve this issue, and just takes his time to make another delay. New deadlock is on the horizon and possible 3-5 month delay. Defendants are doing everything possible to create another delay. It's funny to see how unprofeshionnaly this case is handled.
On November 17th plaintiffs provided a plan how to distribute money via finance/brokerage companies. Lamber going circles, because he is afraid to take some additional steps (schedule plaintiffs and defendants teams meeting) in order to resolve this issue, and just takes his time to make another delay. New deadlock is on the horizon and possible 3-5 month delay. Defendants are doing everything possible to create another delay. It's funny to see how unprofeshionnaly this case is handled.
Judge Lamberth entered an order this afternoon saying he’s concluded he needs an allocation plan by December 21 st before he can enter a judgment, directing the parties to submit one, or explain why they can’t.
On November 17th, both Plaintiffs and Defendants provided a plan for handing out the $$. Defendants as always provided a plan to consider 2-3 months of delays.
Plaintiffs plan is very simple: to handle it via finance/brokerage companies, that have lists of All of the shareholders and number of shares.
I'm highly surprised with the toothless position of the plaintiffs legal team. Where are the stakeholders? Why are they still silent? It's a disgrace
It depends on lamber, if he would announce his final decision.
No yet, someone has to be professor of mathematics to calculate number of days of the delays for the period 2013-2023. What a shame