Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Oh no. Rodster and DR5. A real dream team. Even combined their grand total of accurate posts or predictions remains ZERO.
One is down over $400,000 on this investment but refuses to challenge the status quo.
And the other guy, well I think we all know his track record. BEIL, QTMM.
Now that’s funny.
Good luck guys. You’re going to need it.
Hey Board, did someone appoint DR5 the judge and jury on who gets “attacked.”
I personally have never strung together a string of posts to Trust or anyone else, like the ones DR5 did (see below) to another poster.
His “special relationship” with trust. And their plans to slip away to Italy together have left him blind to the tone his other messages on here.
DR5 posts below:
“Hey MORON, we have a full clinical submission on 3/20/24. You post nothing but BullShit!
You ass! That statement is what EVERY company has to put in their pressers when going for an approval. Just standard legal jargon! God you’re an idiot!
You are a liar and a FRAUD!
OLD NEWS, DUMMY! That’s been settled back in ‘22. Clean slate now!!!! What an absolute idiot you are!
You’re a despicable piece of garbage!”
——
I have debated with the same poster and never had to resort to these “attack” statements.
Straight from the link Thom’s team shared in the last PR…this reference number is for internal purposes and can’t be tracked online:
Quote:
Within 45 days after a PMA is received by FDA, the agency will notify the applicant whether the application has been filed. The letter will include the PMA reference number and the date FDA filed the PMA. Expedited review status, if appropriate, may be communicated at this time. The date of filing is the date that a PMA accepted for filing was received by the agency. The 180-day period for review of a PMA starts on the date of filing.
Straight from the link Thom’s team shared in the last PR…this reference number is for internal purposes and can’t be tracked online:
Quote:
Within 45 days after a PMA is received by FDA, the agency will notify the applicant whether the application has been filed. The letter will include the PMA reference number and the date FDA filed the PMA. Expedited review status, if appropriate, may be communicated at this time. The date of filing is the date that a PMA accepted for filing was received by the agency. The 180-day period for review of a PMA starts on the date of filing.
I’ll give you the courtesy of explaining your “keyboard warrior” reference.
Remembering, that I was respectfully replying to your question to me on June 12th, when trust blew a gasket.
*remember
“Attack on trust. “. Hahahaha.
I quoted his “attack” on another poster and you run to his defense.
You’re such a follower. You should have backed up JHog at the time, or any others that he has “attacked.”
You’re such a coward. It’s easy to stand beside the loudmouth in the class.
Anything to not get bullied yourself.
I remover a post a few years ago when you thought trust was mad at you and you almost had a nervous breakdown.
Here’s the uneducated response of a madman, to another’s opinion.
Same old garbage spewing from him for 5 plus years. 5 years of this loud mouth saying the same things every time someone offers an opposing opinion.
trusttheman
Re: Chrism0000 post# 2517
Tuesday, 05/21/2019 3:15:03 PM
You're clueless JHogg. What is out there is a pile of garbage. You clearly know nothing about the industry or the products in this field. Please sell so I can laugh at you. Now go away little boy. If you believe any of the garbage you are talking, you would have sold a long time ago. You're just another pathetic troll, looking for some insight. Like I said, sell all your shares so the board can have a laugh at you. Oh that's right. You won't because you're another imbecile who wants to try and buy more at a lower price
JHOGG
Re: Justdave1 post# 2512
Tuesday, 05/21/2019 11:21:13 AM
It will not corner the market. What MDs are using now works! Hospital contracts, pricing, MD relationships, changing habits and many other factors will be in play for this product to get stocked and used. This product will not grow the market. Therefore, either a company will acquire Hemostyp to keep current market share or a competitor will acquire to enter the market. The later must have significant roots in the hospital system to make an impact. $1B buy out would be a big win! $1.4 Max!!!
“holiday scam story, it shuts you right up”
I am proud of that post. I have never and will never “shut up” regarding an opinion based post. I have reposted and quoted from it many times.
You need some therapy to help get over it though.
That post says it all.
I rest my case.
Wrong again DR5. Here’s his reply following my June 12 opinion of the PMA:
trusttheman
Re: None
Monday, 06/17/2024 10:33:26 AM
You're embarrassing yourself again Wave. Your last post is why I'm extremely confident you aren't a shareholder. You would have to be unbelievably dense or just corrupt to compare a press release in 2021 to now in 2024. You of all people stated how much the company had to do back then to get to this point. So now, when they have the application completed and are at the door you think the company should update shareholders with FDA news? You are out of your mind. The company should not and will not disclose anything at this point. They would be insane to do so. If you were playing close attention to things which you obviously aren't, you would know the following. Brian and the team have been burned multiple times by vendors and others who told them something would happen at a certain time and then it didn't. So, Brian and the team looked bad updating shareholders with things that didn't happen. They are tired of that happening to them and rightly so. They only thing we will hear from the company is approval and then an offer. That is it. So drop the same old nonsense you have been doing for months now. Trying to create panic just like with your holiday b.s. story that nobody has forgotten about.
You’re. Not your.
Please reference a false post. If I am the “king” there must be many.
Not true at all dr5. As in this post I’ve replied to from June 12th.
I gave a perfectly respectful opinion on where this PMA stands. Only to have trust chime in with all kinds of insults and accusations.
Sometimes I have to be more aggressive if people go too far with false meaningless unrelated statements and claim they “researched” the info so it may be taken as true.
Am I hard on you guys after you make unrealistic predictions and claim to have insight? Yes, but only if I know you are 100 percent wrong.
I’ve never told other posters to “sell all their shares” or “get the hell out of here.”
I’ve never called others “shorts” (other than Sporty,) “paid bashers.” or “disgruntled former employee.”
I don’t have to swear at posters.
Boards are for debating. I do it very well. At times I do have to absolutely destroy posters to keep them in line. Otherwise, I’m pretty quiet on here.
So yes, go back and read my posts. It will do you a great service.
Good call Jimmy. Unfortunately, if anyone posts so much as an opinion that isn’t agreeable to Trust and his minion, things spiral out of control.
Hilarious, after I quote you stating “I told you so,” you go on to say I’m always saying I’m right.
Of course you ended up being wrong, but the point remains the same.
Imagine how you’ll react if you are ever right about something.
I guess we may never find out.
DR5
Re: None
Thursday, 09/10/2020 12:29:09 PM
For those that doubted my saying that approval is in the near term......I told you so!
Ouch.
I thought you had me on Ignore.
Plus, I said you shouldn’t read the post. Now go reinsert your head.
Now that I know you two don’t have me on Ignore, I’ll be sure to alert you when the “WITHIN 180 day” time line starts.
Maybe if you “researched” the correct PMA process you’d be able to speak intelligently.
Even your juvenile name calling reeks of uneducated simplicity.
So lame. So weak. So sad.
For those of us that would like a PR- good or bad. Please continue reading.
For those that prefer their head in the sand or in Drs case, up Trusts - - - -. You don’t need to read any further. Or as Trust would say “get the hell out of here”
It’s been 3 months since we were told the PMA application was submitted.
The FDA has responded either positively or negatively to the application.
Only a fool (trust and DR5) would see this lack of communication as OK.
After we witness another massive timeline fail by dr5 and his total lack of knowledge (researched the wrong PMA process,) let’s at least be realistic about the Thom team we’re dealing with.
His history of vague PRs is literally all we have to go on. Due to that the share price is taking another beating. Down 0.03+ since the application was submitted.
But apparently that’s MMs and even Ihub posters fault. According to the simpleton.
Personally, I just want to know where the PMA stands.
I’m not trying to:
“scare shareholders away”
“Lower the share price”
I’m not a:
“disgruntled former employee”
“Insider”
“Owner”
Just a shareholder waiting for information. I’ve never put unrealistic timelines on approval, I just want facts. The fake news timelines come from Dr, Trust and Rodman.
If anything , it is the disappointment after their timelines fail that could repeatedly “cause panic,” but that’s giving their board influence way too much credit.
Let’s go Thom.
“ Brian and the team have been burned multiple times by vendors and others who told them something would happen at a certain time and then it didn't”
Are you somehow playing the victim card on behalf of Thom. The stock is down $1 per share since he took over.
You’re suggesting that poor Thom was mislead all this time. Ahhh. Poor Thom and team.
You were better when you had a spine. Instead now you just whine about other posters opinions.
Here’s a reminder of when you had a backbone:
trusttheman
Re: Waverunners post# 10848
Friday, 01/06/2023 9:18:57 AM
The board of this company is completely useless. I've said it along with many other long term investors. Thom should have been fired over a year and a half ago. Not only does he have zero desire or skill to communicate with shareholders but he clearly doesn't give a crap about finishing this in a timely manner. As Wave said, he's getting paid. Do I expect approval. 100%. Did Beplate make an enormous mistake hiring Thom. 100%. Inept would be kind describing this buffoon.“
Here’s the weekend “hot take” post that trust has obsessed over for the past year.
I continue to stand by the post. Acknowledging then and now that it was a “feeling” that I had at the time. Of course, it has essentially all come true.
The pricing estimates were clearly just for conversation and debate, but of course Trust had to freak out.
All his posts (and there were many) were deleted due to his inability to debate anything rationally.
Whoa, that got pretty weird there Z. Slow down and think things through. You’re (you are) all over the place.
The FDA would have followed up with UHP on the Hemostyp application within 45 days of submission.
Since there are no rules or expectations from the FDA or SEC implying that they can’t share the information, UHP is choosing to not share it.
When they had positive application status in 2021 they shared the information immediately:
May 5,2021
“following the resubmission of its application for Pre-market Approval for HemoStyp gauze on April 6th, the FDA has now accepted for review and commenced its Substantive Review of the application.”
It’s anyone’s guess from here, but I think my point is clear.
“Extremely articulate” ???
His first word was a spelling error.
I know the FDA guidelines, and I know how to read a PR. Based on both the FDA PMA timelines and statements made by UHP, it is a certainty that the FDA has communicated with UHP since the PMA was submitted.
Good Luck to all. There’s a long weekend coming, but I’ll save my BBQ hot takes this year. So everyone just relax.
They’ve already made the 45 day decision. We just don’t know what it is.
Plus Zorax is just some guy that slithered in here and took a moderator spot hoping to trash the board. He can’t do better.
I see that I have reduced you to idle ramblings.
Just spewing out drivel.
I’ll leave you alone for a while.
It took you 5 days to come up with that work of fiction?
“Working forensics for law enforcement”
That’s the best line I’ve heard on here in ages.
Do you want to try this one again:
“I've recovered in value of jewelry and objects and returned it all to the owners than you've made in penny stock in the last 30 years.“
Not bad Shoondale. I’ll give you credit for trying. You put in some work and searched Google for funny Fishing Gifs.
I don’t know this young man, but based on his tan lines he’s likely a hard worker Mon to Fri and just out enjoying some weekend R&R. Good for him.
You should have added “beach” to your search though. That would have been much more relevant to our banter.
But again, good effort, I’ll give you a B+
BTW…what on earth does this attempt at detective work mean:
“This hints at someplace tropical or at least sub-tropical which are generally the most expensive places to live especially near the water.”
You generalized an entire geographical temperature zone to suit some weird agenda that Zorax is wealthy.
BTW. It’s 82 degrees in Cleveland today. Edgewater Beach is rocking.
Hey, there’s a detectorist. Maybe it’s Zorax.
Shoon, do you know what color speedo he’s wearing today.
You two make this too easy.
One thing you do know about Zorax, is that he’s the moderator of this board.
Meaning he can delete offensive messages.
However, he chose to leave a message directed at you last weekend for all to see.
He didn’t delete it and he definitely didn’t try to defend you.
It would still be posted if I didn’t report it.
I chose to report it and also called out the poster for going too far.
So I find it odd that you would post a long post about metal detecting, when he couldn’t care a less that someone wished the worst possible fate on you.
Truth is, I don’t know you from a “hole in the wall,” but I wouldn’t let that stand.
Remember that Shoondale, not one other poster cared a bit. Including your Zorax.
Bottom line, I shut him down with ease as usual, your ramble doesn’t help his cause.
Wakey wakey Zorax. Some poor little kid lost his ice cream money at the beach yesterday. This is your big day to make some $$ with your “enjoyable hobby.”
Don’t let the bottle caps get you down either.
Your treasure may be in the next stoop and scoop.
That sounds about right. Scavenging around the beaches desperate to make a few dollars off other people’s misfortune.
The ladies must be very impressed.
Thank you for finally telling the truth.
GetRch, interesting that you’re lecturing on patience now. The posts relating to future PRs by Pragmatic and I are clear statements of how the PMA timeline works. And could (should in my opinion) result in a PR.
BTW, where was your patience in March when you wrote:
“8 weeks to review sterilization data and submit is plenty long enough to have given a further update. This tells me that either they submitted and have big news coming, but are fearful of leaks so don't want another PR, or they are clueless on what to do next and are fumbling around looking for a Doug-like expert to bail them out.
Enough is enough Brian - Finish the Deal!”
OR Dec 2023:
“11 weeks is MORE THAN ENOUGH TIME to complete those tests. From the companies I've run, and my experience, If I was Thom, I would be sleeping at the test facility, right next to the testing team and the owners working daily to get this done well, ASAP.
I get "wait and see for shareholders." The wait and see by Thom while the test facility F#*^S around is INEXCUSABLE. Take some ownership and walk the test facility across the finish line.”
It’s amazing how bad you are at this, considering you post so often.
You are a living contrast to the book “Outliers.”
Malcolm will have to do a complete rewrite of his premise.
That’s pretty sad Zorax. Did you spend the last 3 weeks reviewing my posts (as I suggested) looking for any evidence of a “GRAFT?”
I know that’s an impossible task.
I wanted you to spend the time learning about hemostyp and the PMA process. Not looking for “grafts.”
When I reply to Shoone, and provide clarity that may support his view, then so be it.
I’m not on anyone’s side here. I just provide realistic, fact based information.
I believe I also had to help him when he made a “graft” about Texas and Nevada.
Your tax comment is full of “grafts” as well.
It actually exposes just how desperate you are.
You completely misinterpreted my statement with your “tax friendly “ gibberish.
I didn’t say Nevada was a Tax Free state. I clearly said Zero Taxable Gains.
I also said “hope to go tax free”. Hope. No guarantees.
BTW were you drunk when you wrote this:
“Thanks for that. I'm disappointed that your superior intellect didn't catch your graft. Or as an employee of uhp, just setting up the groundwork for a furture p&d?”
Pragmatic, another accurate post re the current state of the PMA and where it stands with the FDA. Thank You, Hopefully UHP updates Shareholders in a timely manner.
If/when they announce if the FDA has agreed to File the application, Hemostyp will then (and only then) move on to the full review stage.
Typically UHP is quick with positive news, and vague with negative news. We’ll see what happens this time around.
Here’s a quote from the last time Hemostyp got to this stage successfully.
May 5,2021,— yes 3 years ago.
“following the resubmission of its application for Pre-market Approval for HemoStyp gauze on April 6th, the FDA has now accepted for review and commenced its Substantive Review of the application.”
Hopefully there are no resubmissions required this time around. As in that case, the original was submitted Oct 2020.
Oh man, this guy is seriously traumatized over a “summer” post. Call a dr5 and get him the help he needs.
Trusts bombastic(and wrong)political predictions:
trusttheman
Re: DR5 post# 4494
Thursday, 02/20/2020 11:02:34 AM
Trump won't break a sweat getting re-elected. Not only that but you won't see another democrat win the presidency for the next 20 to 40 years. That is the kind of damage those dopes have done with their sulking attacks on this president. The democrats are finished as a party.
Wrong wrong wrong again
Regarding your opinion of all the other longs on this board, my inbox would prove you wrong. You travel in a tiny circle of people afraid to offer you anything but what you want to hear.
I know for a fact that many longs share my views or at least appreciate them as debatable views.
To the longs that do private message me and ask me to reply directly; my free membership doesn’t allow replies.
Also, don’t be afraid to post your opinion on the open forum. I’ll protect you from any backlash from trust and his little group of mean girls.
But you do read my posts.
My posts are accurate and fact based. Yours are loud and based on your broad reaching uneducated views.
Why are you so mad if anyone has a different opinion than yours.
I post your old posts as an example of your bullying tendencies.
I will continue to do so as long as your only debate technique is to tell people they are shorts, disgruntled employees, trolls etc.
Did you ever think some people just have a different opinion than you.
Can someone get Trust some therapy for the depth my “summer holiday” post has affected his life.
As all can see by reading these posts, I am clearly not the miserable one.
Every bully needs a good smack once in a while.
Consider yourself smacked.