Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If a truthful, factual post is considered negative in your world then that is your choice.
To me it is simply laying out the facts as they are available.
You were all given the opportunity to prove me wrong or show an instance where I misrepresented the facts for personal gain.
Neither the pumpers or bashers were able to find even one post where I posted falsely.
Bottom line, the Bashers don’t like when I support Hemostyp as a great product with a huge future, if controlled by the right team.
Pumpers don’t like my realistic timelines based on facts provided by the FDA.
I can’t do anything about posters insecurities regarding their investment.
I appreciate that I am now on ignore by 3 of you so there is no reason for you to read or react to my posts. I will enjoy the peace as well.
With that said have a great future and best of luck with a payday at some point.
No one’s retirement savings should be mired with losses.
Hey Rod, while I have you…I just did a quick audit of my own.
7 of your last 10 UEEC posts were spiteful, bullying “attacks”on posters you choose to not agree with.
That’s 70% of your last 10 posts written to make others feel that their opinion is meaningless if it doesn’t agree with yours.
Please treat all posters with respect going forward.
I’m here to have debates and offer fact based opinions. I can successfully go back and forth with anyone, as I have absolute confidence in my research.
However, I can see that he is struggling mightily and likely needs a break from discussion boards, as he feels any conflicting views must be addressed with name calling and blatant disregard for facts.
I will leave him be now, I wish him good health. That’s all I can offer.
However, I’m always here for a good intelligent debate.
Speaking of which, did you audit my numbers yet? You called me a liar. Remember?
It’s too bad you can’t treat posters with opposing views with respect.
I’m starting to believe your massive losses are affecting you worse than I thought.
I’m truly hoping for the best for you.
Ok. Coming from a guy making toilet and 💩 emoji posts.
I continue to feel sorry for you. Use your energy to do truthful research, not just pandering to your target audience.
That’s another “attack”” based on falsehoods. I have politely replied to Dark with my reasoning for including him.
Please don’t speak out of turn.
I can see the posts you like on here. If you support posts calling my “holiday post” a “scam story” etc. then I know what you’re all about. If you like that post then you encourage the poster to continue with his zero evidence “attacks.”
I can only assume you also couldn’t handle my fact based opinions, and that you don’t think I own any shares. As those were the points put forth in his post.
As a moderator I figured you could help them with the morning challenge. Then you’re rid of me once and for all.
I’m curious though. Name one of my posts about Hemostyp and its past, current, or future prospects that you don’t agree with.
Did my post end up being truthful and evidence based after all?
I have always maintained that with the right guidance Hemostyp will get approval.
In contrast, what Trust, DR5, Rodman posts ended up playing out the way they had aggressively hoped for?
Thanks for your time.
For your reference:
Waverunners
Re: trusttheman post# 11291
Saturday, 04/01/2023 2:32:20 PM
Sorry for slow reply. I’m only allowed one post a day so won’t be checking in too often.
They’ve had a consultant for a long time.
Somehow he didn’t know that all of this testing had to be done in order for the PMA to progress.
If I knew- please tell me they knew.
If they truly have full access to the consultant and he didn’t advise UHP immediately upon being contracted -and learning that UHP moved factories after human trials.- that they MUST produce USA product, then yes the consultant is “that stupid to make mistakes like this.”
Second inconsistent messaging:
Originally RCA advised that if first test is successful , then within a FEW days the PMA would move forward.
Apparently Test was a success! But then new Test is ordered- why?
They never mentioned this before.
Shouldn’t experts have known this would be needed and if they did why did they say “a few days” originally???
Reason - they screwed up the test process.
Then when they do a complete test the true results come in.
You will know the true level of incompetence when we are still wondering what stage of the process we’re in as we enter 2024!
I ASSURE you.
Again, I have nothing to hide. All posts are for public consumption. Unless you can actually reference a post or be accurate with your quotes please stop messaging me.
Just saying “long time posters remember” isn’t evidence of anything.
“…built a plant?” No I wouldn’t say that. they have contract plants.
Their original PMA did reference an agreement to manufacture Hemostyp from start to finish at one plant. That PMA failed as the Hemostyp used in Human Trials was Asian. And it turned out UHP hadn’t actually manufactured American Hemostyp to spec when they submitted the PMA and had to scramble to get new product at the same specs as Asia. I referenced this blunder many times.
My famous Memorial Day post was never positioned as fact, but rather, “a feeling.”
It was my opinion and I’m entitled to it.
You have yourself a great day. Good luck with your research.
Also, if you can send trust my earlier reply I’d appreciate it.
And the “attacks” continue.
I believe you’re in your 60’s. Come on, do better.
They did keep their plant “overseas.”
What’s wrong with you? This is a fact.
People send you my posts? That’s weird. They should respect that you don’t want to see them. Otherwise, you wouldn’t have me on ignore.
Do they cut and paste the whole post?
Classy Dr5. It’s a shame you are so defeated that all you have is toilets and name calling.
Good luck with that in retirement.
Hi Rodster. I thought you claimed to be an accountant? Dust off that calculator and do the math. Once completed let me know where you think my numbers were off.
I look forward to the results of your audit.
I’ll keep looking for my “FDA Manual” you referred to.
Do you want one that is more specific than the link UHP provided?
And remember it’s — You’re not your.
“… your a LIAR!“
As always, I respectfully challenge you or anyone else to find even one deliberately inaccurate statement I have ever made on this board.
If you or anyone else can find a post where I deliberately mislead readers or posted falsehoods that would have lead to my personal gain from UEEC I will gladly stop posting.
Note, you can’t just make things up because you don’t like my tone or viewpoint. You will have to show that I lied due to this axe to grind or desire to pump.
I have never made up timelines based on weak facts, researched the wrong PMA process, or asked others to sell all their shares.
Remember, like all posters, I’m entitled to my opinion.
You have 24 hours.
Here’s your team of investigators:
The Pumpers
DR5
Trust
Rodman
Dark
The Bashers
Zorax
Shoondale.
I’m sure if you can all get together and put your differences aside, it should be no problem to find posts that I was deliberately making stuff up to either scare off shareholders (pumper stance)
Or work to artificially enhance the pps (basher stance)
Amazing that 5 posters have such opposing views of the exact same posts.
So, now that everyone realizes that there is a Within 180 day clock. And the PR clearly references it in terms that most can understand.
I will break it down before someone else tries to manipulate the information.
180 days started approximately Mar 21.
180 days stopped approximately June 18
That’s approximately 89 days into the process.
Careful now, this is where others will try to twist the information.
The clock WILL NOT start upon resubmission. It will start once the FDA states that all the information is accurate, and all the deficiencies have been addressed. If FDA finds the resubmission acceptable and moves it to full in depth review, the clock will start again. At that time there will be 91 days on the clock.
It is not standard for every company to receive this letter.
What are you basing that on?
They issued this letter because the application was below FDA standards. Read the FDA notes below.
The CEO and the Consultant submitted an application with 40 points of concern.
———
FDA will refuse to file the application for substantive review if a PMA application does not meet a minimum threshold of acceptability. If the information or data are presented unclearly or incompletely or are not capable of withstanding rigorous scientific review, FDA may consider the PMA incomplete and not file it. If FDA refuses to file a PMA, FDA will notify the applicant of the reasons for the refusal. This notice will identify the deficiencies in the application that prevent filing and will include the PMA reference number. FDA will advise the manufacturer of what information must be provided, or steps to be taken, to make the application fileable.
So now you believe there is a WITHIN 180 day review period?
I agree that this proves once again that my assessment of the PMA process was and is correct.
The clock is now paused.
It will resume when the amended file is submitted.
At that time I will not have to debate you, DR5, Rodman or anyone else that thinks they know the system and makes up unreasonable timelines. Especially, if they “research” the wrong process.
Oh no. Rodster and DR5. A real dream team. Even combined their grand total of accurate posts or predictions remains ZERO.
One is down over $400,000 on this investment but refuses to challenge the status quo.
And the other guy, well I think we all know his track record. BEIL, QTMM.
Now that’s funny.
Good luck guys. You’re going to need it.
Hey Board, did someone appoint DR5 the judge and jury on who gets “attacked.”
I personally have never strung together a string of posts to Trust or anyone else, like the ones DR5 did (see below) to another poster.
His “special relationship” with trust. And their plans to slip away to Italy together have left him blind to the tone his other messages on here.
DR5 posts below:
“Hey MORON, we have a full clinical submission on 3/20/24. You post nothing but BullShit!
You ass! That statement is what EVERY company has to put in their pressers when going for an approval. Just standard legal jargon! God you’re an idiot!
You are a liar and a FRAUD!
OLD NEWS, DUMMY! That’s been settled back in ‘22. Clean slate now!!!! What an absolute idiot you are!
You’re a despicable piece of garbage!”
——
I have debated with the same poster and never had to resort to these “attack” statements.
Straight from the link Thom’s team shared in the last PR…this reference number is for internal purposes and can’t be tracked online:
Quote:
Within 45 days after a PMA is received by FDA, the agency will notify the applicant whether the application has been filed. The letter will include the PMA reference number and the date FDA filed the PMA. Expedited review status, if appropriate, may be communicated at this time. The date of filing is the date that a PMA accepted for filing was received by the agency. The 180-day period for review of a PMA starts on the date of filing.
Straight from the link Thom’s team shared in the last PR…this reference number is for internal purposes and can’t be tracked online:
Quote:
Within 45 days after a PMA is received by FDA, the agency will notify the applicant whether the application has been filed. The letter will include the PMA reference number and the date FDA filed the PMA. Expedited review status, if appropriate, may be communicated at this time. The date of filing is the date that a PMA accepted for filing was received by the agency. The 180-day period for review of a PMA starts on the date of filing.
I’ll give you the courtesy of explaining your “keyboard warrior” reference.
Remembering, that I was respectfully replying to your question to me on June 12th, when trust blew a gasket.
*remember
“Attack on trust. “. Hahahaha.
I quoted his “attack” on another poster and you run to his defense.
You’re such a follower. You should have backed up JHog at the time, or any others that he has “attacked.”
You’re such a coward. It’s easy to stand beside the loudmouth in the class.
Anything to not get bullied yourself.
I remover a post a few years ago when you thought trust was mad at you and you almost had a nervous breakdown.
Here’s the uneducated response of a madman, to another’s opinion.
Same old garbage spewing from him for 5 plus years. 5 years of this loud mouth saying the same things every time someone offers an opposing opinion.
trusttheman
Re: Chrism0000 post# 2517
Tuesday, 05/21/2019 3:15:03 PM
You're clueless JHogg. What is out there is a pile of garbage. You clearly know nothing about the industry or the products in this field. Please sell so I can laugh at you. Now go away little boy. If you believe any of the garbage you are talking, you would have sold a long time ago. You're just another pathetic troll, looking for some insight. Like I said, sell all your shares so the board can have a laugh at you. Oh that's right. You won't because you're another imbecile who wants to try and buy more at a lower price
JHOGG
Re: Justdave1 post# 2512
Tuesday, 05/21/2019 11:21:13 AM
It will not corner the market. What MDs are using now works! Hospital contracts, pricing, MD relationships, changing habits and many other factors will be in play for this product to get stocked and used. This product will not grow the market. Therefore, either a company will acquire Hemostyp to keep current market share or a competitor will acquire to enter the market. The later must have significant roots in the hospital system to make an impact. $1B buy out would be a big win! $1.4 Max!!!
“holiday scam story, it shuts you right up”
I am proud of that post. I have never and will never “shut up” regarding an opinion based post. I have reposted and quoted from it many times.
You need some therapy to help get over it though.
That post says it all.
I rest my case.
Wrong again DR5. Here’s his reply following my June 12 opinion of the PMA:
trusttheman
Re: None
Monday, 06/17/2024 10:33:26 AM
You're embarrassing yourself again Wave. Your last post is why I'm extremely confident you aren't a shareholder. You would have to be unbelievably dense or just corrupt to compare a press release in 2021 to now in 2024. You of all people stated how much the company had to do back then to get to this point. So now, when they have the application completed and are at the door you think the company should update shareholders with FDA news? You are out of your mind. The company should not and will not disclose anything at this point. They would be insane to do so. If you were playing close attention to things which you obviously aren't, you would know the following. Brian and the team have been burned multiple times by vendors and others who told them something would happen at a certain time and then it didn't. So, Brian and the team looked bad updating shareholders with things that didn't happen. They are tired of that happening to them and rightly so. They only thing we will hear from the company is approval and then an offer. That is it. So drop the same old nonsense you have been doing for months now. Trying to create panic just like with your holiday b.s. story that nobody has forgotten about.
You’re. Not your.
Please reference a false post. If I am the “king” there must be many.
Not true at all dr5. As in this post I’ve replied to from June 12th.
I gave a perfectly respectful opinion on where this PMA stands. Only to have trust chime in with all kinds of insults and accusations.
Sometimes I have to be more aggressive if people go too far with false meaningless unrelated statements and claim they “researched” the info so it may be taken as true.
Am I hard on you guys after you make unrealistic predictions and claim to have insight? Yes, but only if I know you are 100 percent wrong.
I’ve never told other posters to “sell all their shares” or “get the hell out of here.”
I’ve never called others “shorts” (other than Sporty,) “paid bashers.” or “disgruntled former employee.”
I don’t have to swear at posters.
Boards are for debating. I do it very well. At times I do have to absolutely destroy posters to keep them in line. Otherwise, I’m pretty quiet on here.
So yes, go back and read my posts. It will do you a great service.
Good call Jimmy. Unfortunately, if anyone posts so much as an opinion that isn’t agreeable to Trust and his minion, things spiral out of control.
Hilarious, after I quote you stating “I told you so,” you go on to say I’m always saying I’m right.
Of course you ended up being wrong, but the point remains the same.
Imagine how you’ll react if you are ever right about something.
I guess we may never find out.
DR5
Re: None
Thursday, 09/10/2020 12:29:09 PM
For those that doubted my saying that approval is in the near term......I told you so!
Ouch.
I thought you had me on Ignore.
Plus, I said you shouldn’t read the post. Now go reinsert your head.
Now that I know you two don’t have me on Ignore, I’ll be sure to alert you when the “WITHIN 180 day” time line starts.
Maybe if you “researched” the correct PMA process you’d be able to speak intelligently.
Even your juvenile name calling reeks of uneducated simplicity.
So lame. So weak. So sad.
For those of us that would like a PR- good or bad. Please continue reading.
For those that prefer their head in the sand or in Drs case, up Trusts - - - -. You don’t need to read any further. Or as Trust would say “get the hell out of here”
It’s been 3 months since we were told the PMA application was submitted.
The FDA has responded either positively or negatively to the application.
Only a fool (trust and DR5) would see this lack of communication as OK.
After we witness another massive timeline fail by dr5 and his total lack of knowledge (researched the wrong PMA process,) let’s at least be realistic about the Thom team we’re dealing with.
His history of vague PRs is literally all we have to go on. Due to that the share price is taking another beating. Down 0.03+ since the application was submitted.
But apparently that’s MMs and even Ihub posters fault. According to the simpleton.
Personally, I just want to know where the PMA stands.
I’m not trying to:
“scare shareholders away”
“Lower the share price”
I’m not a:
“disgruntled former employee”
“Insider”
“Owner”
Just a shareholder waiting for information. I’ve never put unrealistic timelines on approval, I just want facts. The fake news timelines come from Dr, Trust and Rodman.
If anything , it is the disappointment after their timelines fail that could repeatedly “cause panic,” but that’s giving their board influence way too much credit.
Let’s go Thom.
“ Brian and the team have been burned multiple times by vendors and others who told them something would happen at a certain time and then it didn't”
Are you somehow playing the victim card on behalf of Thom. The stock is down $1 per share since he took over.
You’re suggesting that poor Thom was mislead all this time. Ahhh. Poor Thom and team.
You were better when you had a spine. Instead now you just whine about other posters opinions.
Here’s a reminder of when you had a backbone:
trusttheman
Re: Waverunners post# 10848
Friday, 01/06/2023 9:18:57 AM
The board of this company is completely useless. I've said it along with many other long term investors. Thom should have been fired over a year and a half ago. Not only does he have zero desire or skill to communicate with shareholders but he clearly doesn't give a crap about finishing this in a timely manner. As Wave said, he's getting paid. Do I expect approval. 100%. Did Beplate make an enormous mistake hiring Thom. 100%. Inept would be kind describing this buffoon.“
Here’s the weekend “hot take” post that trust has obsessed over for the past year.
I continue to stand by the post. Acknowledging then and now that it was a “feeling” that I had at the time. Of course, it has essentially all come true.
The pricing estimates were clearly just for conversation and debate, but of course Trust had to freak out.
All his posts (and there were many) were deleted due to his inability to debate anything rationally.
Whoa, that got pretty weird there Z. Slow down and think things through. You’re (you are) all over the place.