you would be better off buying a $5 foot long from Subway and flushing the other $595 down the toilet.

the only run left in this gargantuan turd is to everyone's accountant when it is declared worthless.

my family connections tell me that petard is in negotiations with "Big Bjorn's Discount Audit Shack" in Reykjavik

you call them "opinions", i call it "common sense"

if it looks like a duck...etc.

my guess is that those who invested in SLJB have no money for food and need copious amount of medicinal drugs to overcome depression

i really wonder if the price is going to go down too much more after the decision tomorrow. personally, i think most shares are still held by people wanting to take the write off. i believe they need to hold it through delisting in order to exercise the fraud provisions in the tax code. i could be wrong.

the only hope that shareholders have is that the osc has frozen petard's and devries' bank accounts and are ready to reimburse shareholders with said monies. any action short of that, this is a dead horse and any actions against the perps will be a joke.

no, they have the obligation to protect the public from companies like sulja. you have it backwards, as usual.

who, exactly, is left to turn this around? petard is awol, steve doesnt want anything to do with the company, devries has never been seen, leslie is looking for a job. who is left and what could they possibly bring to the table?

red, where exactly has jannie demonstrated that this company has any operations? phoning steve does not equate to a live company. please be specific

red, i am reposting my question to you. perhaps you did not see it:

Posted by: toddeholden
In reply to: redskiesatnight who wrote msg# 292892 Date:2/15/2008 3:55:15 PM
Post #of 293032

red, i know you said you believe assets were transferred, but do you know roughly what value each of those assets hold?

as near as i can tell, all of their stores are closed, so those arent assets. no one has ever mentioned exactly what the red sea assets are, nor what their value is. if you could post ball park figures naming the value of each significant asset under the sljb umbrella i think you would gain a huge amount of credibility. however, if you sidestep answering such a direct question i dont think it helps your cause.

eagerly awaiting your response

red, i know you said you believe assets were transferred, but do you know roughly what value each of those assets hold?

as near as i can tell, all of their stores are closed, so those arent assets. no one has ever mentioned exactly what the red sea assets are, nor what their value is. if you could post ball park figures naming the value of each significant asset under the sljb umbrella i think you would gain a huge amount of credibility. however, if you sidestep answering such a direct question i dont think it helps your cause.

eagerly awaiting your response

red your hunch is wrong. i cant possibly see what shareholders own and dont see the big picture that someone has obviously shared with you.

perhaps you could stop hiding behind metaphors and hyperbole long enough share your information. i dont care how you "feel" about your investment, i would like to know the concrete reasons behind your feeling. what exactly do we own? is that too much to ask of a fellow shareholder?

red, what exactly do shareholders own? i for one would like someone that is clearly on the inside (such as yourself) to provide us a summarized accounting of the assets we own. since you seem to have insight here, why dont you post your excellent DD for the ibox? i think you can agree that generic positive statements could be considered mere cheerleading, but substantive data would truly be of assistance to anyone interested in investing in this company.

please share asap!!!

it is good to see that complete and utter dishonesty is still rampant here. perhaps another last ditch pump is coming.

are you referring to sljb or ihub?

dont you mean an unclean "wessal" ? ;)

dont they need to rebuild colchester first?

couchspud, risk/reward is a ratio. it is calculated by the expected likely loss relative to the possible gain. here, i estimate the formula to look like this:

risk/reward = 100%/0 = infinite loss.

the only value here is the inherent value of a pink trading shell. if this were a clean shell, it would be about $50,000. with regulators clamping down on trading scams and the legal liabilities with this thing mounting, i would argue that this company has a negative net worth, making .0001 per share grossly overvalued.

no one will ever touch this thing again. there are just too many clean shells out there. it isnt worth cleaning up.

imho of course

i think you hear steveo singing to the OSC

you are saying that a group of people you know owns a tenth of a million shares of sljb? what did they do, pool their returnable cans?

decent, honest companies dont need defenders or fan clubs.

NSS= No Stinkin' Shorts/eom

what exactly does that mean?

honest question, right?

um...shares?/eom

easy earnest...they certainly have those liabilities, but perhaps devries has connected them with a second phase bs pump and dump crew that can bring this turd to .05 again after they print off a few billion bogus shares. if this pig faaker gets to .o5 again i will be so gone i wont even gloat on message boards. just show me where the porche dealer is. if they can get this turd back to .10 a share i have about a miles worth of lines to snort off the azzes of the olsen twins and i wont even be shy about it. cmon pumptards....lets get this turd launched. my nose is itchin....

"I hope your shares do as well as mine."

what you are saying is "i hope you lose all of your money too"'

not a very polite sentiment, frank. would you like to change it to :
"the....sun will come out...tomororow...bet your bottom dollar that tomorrow...there'll be sun...."

great...2 more months to pump...

i dont know what "true longs" are waiting for either. according to snips, steve is in control of an empty shell, petar is no longer involved in the company whatsoever. the company is dead. no operations, no revenue, no future. even if there are a brazillian naked shorts they have no reason to cover because there is nothing positive here.

can any "true longs" fill me in?

oh, i'm sure he will be smacking something tomorrow...

hock, it is intuitively obvious from looking at the price/volume chart that, while a tiny bit of shares has traded at .0022, it is not enough to make any serious money from.

as i pointed out in a previous post (which was deleted for some reason), if someone was lucky enough to buy at .0007 and sell at .0022, the volume at .0022 was so low they could only have grossed about $75 before commissions.

therefore, no one is flipping this for any decent profit. the volume just isnt there.

the shareholders are in total support?????

this board is proof that the shareholders are NOT in support of losing 95% of their money in this scam. do you actually read the posts here?

jacked?

actually, anyone that bought shares in the past year or so has been jacked.

red, exactly what is the definition of the word "quote"? if steveo was quoted admitting that he was duped in a newspaper article, isnt that a legitimate quote?

tuesday, imho

this steaming load needs a lot more painting-at-the-close before most bagholders get their money back.

february 31st/eom

will you retract that post when the OSC apologizes to the company?

</sarcasm>

earnest, i think i can answer a few of those questions.

1) i believe it refers to sulja ontario because it says "SBS LTD". The LTD designation isnt used in the US

2) it could be steveo's signature. either that or trained worms dipped in ink and slithering on the page. the worms are probably more competent to run the company than either petard or steve, anyway

3) steve is lying. there is no way he could not know he was the sole shareholder of a company.

4) kahn could have been one of any number of directors. directors can be officers of the company or directors "at large" (meaning not employed directly by the company but serving on the board of directors as consultants to the board). since SBS is a private company we have no way of knowing if there were one or a hundred directors. my guess is devries, a few suljas, petard and perhaps a few scammy lawyers were directors.

5) i dont think sulja nevada has anything to do with SBS ontario, so i think the point is moot.

i could be wrong on some, most, or all of this.

a clean pink used to go for about 50k before the chinese scamsters started bidding up shells to about 200k. the price has fallen in the past year. even so, this is hardly a clean shell.