Matt
When exactly did you realize it would be problematic to trade off insider information coming from an individual already involved with the legal process...or were you entirely unaware of that?

Dear Matt the pimpma$ter
Did you send the info about where to send the subpoena or you want someone to call you?

Do you think you would be needed to testify on behalf of the defense or the prosecution?

Waiting for your response,
Pistol

Lastly, for today, Matt...do you think someone should handle this situation the legal way or should someone just cap someone else?

Oh and Matt...you are familiar with the laws relating to stock manipulation, no?

Hey Matt Three questions for your avoidance...
1. Did you get the email about where to send a subpoena duces tecum?
2. Did that email prompt your suspension of Meridian?
3. Is this the first time you've been engaged in the legal process?

Matt - This is your last chance to provide an answer to my questions.

Matt what's the story? I'm still waiting for an answer for the question I asked months ago.

Matt
Is there any good reason you have yet to answer my questions from last month? I'm assuming it's just an oversight on your part.

Matt - but it's ok for board moderators to lob personal attacks and have multiple aliases, eh? ;)

PS Why don't you step up and email me and explain your rationale here. If and when you email me I'll be glad to provide you with a contact number and when you call it, you'll be greeted with a hearty voice saying "Investigations" and then we can have a chat. No joke.

Hey Matt, what's the story? Speak freely.

Matt, how does someone become moderator of a board?

Matt - here's what I'm referring to:

Posted by: chcr
In reply to: None Date:5/20/2005 12:19:41 PM
Post #of 16049

I wonder if Joe Shea will answer this letter I found???

May 16, 2005

Mr. Joe Shea, Editor-in-Chief joeshea@cal.net
The American Reporter joeshea@netcom.com
1812 N. Ivar Ave., no.5
Hollywood, CA 90028-5026

Dear Mr. Shea:

You are hereby notified that the factual content of your Internet posting entitled “Phil Nugent, ERHC Founder, Faces Issues With New Company” is FALSE. A public retraction to this posting is expected.

Mr. Nugent is not “battling to save his newest enterprise, Global Environmental Energy Corp”.
Global is not an “enterprise” of Mr. Nugent’s; he does not have any interest in this company; he is not battling, fighting, struggling, or otherwise exerting himself to “save” this company; and, most importantly, the Sunday London Times article quoted does not mention Mr. Nugent!

For you to flatly state that Mr. Nugent or his company, ERHC, has any management or ownership interest in Global Environmental, a company that is described as insolvent and facing numerous punitive damage and director/investor actions against it, as well as possible tax liability actions, is not only patently libelous but could be characterized as an intentionally tortuous act made with the intention of causing financial harm to Mr. Nugent who is a stockholder of ERHE along with thousands of other people around the world. In fact, Mr. Phil H. Nugent filed a lawsuit on May 9, 2005 against GEECE in Civil District Court in the Parish of Orleans, state of Louisiana; specifically it is civil action Number 2005-6260 Division N-8. This is a suit for Breach of Contract and Dissolution of Partnership Agreement

Consequently, demand is made upon you to publicly withdraw and rescind these allegations and falsehoods. We expect you to print a public retraction on your website blog using the same size and style print as the original article. Failure to publicly retract these falsehoods within the next 3 business days will cause my client to seek redress against you in the Federal Court System of the United States of America.

Your immediate attention to clearing up this matter is appreciated.
-------------
Posted by: chcr
In reply to: None Date:4/29/2004 5:13:48 PM
Post #of 16050

I think you are right. Reading other boards they say this story is not true and in fact was written by the same reporter that claimed ERHC had 10% of block one which also was not true. This reporter needs to get his facts straight.

-------------
Posted by: chcr
In reply to: None Date:4/29/2004 3:06:46 PM
Post #of 16050

This may explain it.

I four this post on another board.

Has anyone consider this maybe a classic case of stock manipulation by a BIG oil company?

I wonder if this reporter was talking to a sober person over there? Was thier source an employee of the JDZ or JDC?

I just wonder.

http://www.ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=ERHC&read=34053
----------

Matt - Thanks for your reply. The moderator of that board (chcr) is an individual with financial and legal insider access to the company through contacts with Phil Nugent, one of the main investors in ERHC and one of the former main investors in GEEC. You will notice that chcr is also the former moderator of the GEEC board. She turned to bashing that company as soon as Nugent sued GEEC. She also posted an open letter from Nugent's lawyer to clarify the situation.

chcr posted misleading/false comments about accurate news stories while the insider clique was selling ERHC over a year ago in an attempt to support the share price while they were selling. Check all the posts from chcr and you'll notice what I'm talking about.

People who point it out, like me and brooklynboy (also in jail), are not welcome. It might also interest you to learn that the stock is involved with the USDOJ regarding stock manipulation.

chcr no longer posts because she was exposed, and now posts as TopDrive... and probably a few others, including some "basher" aliases. Bash while accumulating, support or pump while selling. I'm sure you know the drill.

What else you want to know?

PS FYI - I work as a criminal investigator and can be contacted at ttplino@aol.com. I'll gladly provide further contact info should you seek it.

Capt Nemo - any idea why Matt doesn't respond to questions?

Matt, please don't let me out of jail until you provide us with an explanation as to why and how moderators are allowed multiple aliases.

Thanks.

Matt - Read "the competition board" over on RB, bring all the information available together, and then connect as many dots as you can. That's one of the reasons why we've been waiting/trying/hoping for the opportunity to post here.

Hi Matt, I am not doubting why pistol had his posting privileges revoked. I'm just wondering where the shot came from.
Thanks.

PS Are you aware of who the moderator is on that board and how many aliases are used by chcr?
:)

walldog, did you once say if redinvest could cause people to buy or sell based on his messages, then good for him?

maybe someone like procon who knows what he's doing should be the only one contacting reporters.

oilman, talking about the blogs new story.

procon, is someone going to get skinned alive on the blog or in front of a bigger audience?

why?

The EEZ will be messy only before it starts, especially if exxon is shut out, again.

that is right, because stp doesn't have to split the profits with Nigeria and XOM wants to help their poor brown brothers across the ocean.

it is all about posturing for exxon and the eez.

you need to supply the link, I think. From Ft Smith Fayetteville, Arkansas.

http://www.kfsm.com/Global/story.asp?s=4225823

still nobody knows why this article cannot be found on a yahoo or google news search?

good suggestion homeport.

do you wonder which of these post on the boards?

chcr or topdrive, can you answer that question of rauncho?

a good question on RB is how come this article doesn't come up on yahoo news when you search for 'erhc' or 'sao tome' or 'nigeria' on yahoo news?

rambus or anyone else, can you provide the link to that reuters article?

nwtf, did you read that story on the reuters site?

right procon, most don't know and it's still us buying.

only the company calls ignition

topdrive everytime you post I remember sell high and buy lower

how is mongo screwed?

????????

why Nigeria was bothered by the majors

round of applause for procon.