Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Always,
If you Google Bloomberg David Posel's executive profile and biography it indicates he is former C.O.O. of Canbiola Inc. from Feb. 7, 2018 until 2019. It also shows him as C.O.O. of Pure Leaf Oil @ Canbiola Inc. since 2019. It also shows his salary and restricted stock compensation.
I see that Mack is C.O.O. of Canbiola. The way I read this is that he replaces David Posel. But, is David Posel still with Canbiola as C.O.O. of Pure Leaf Oil? I'm a bit confused on this. Can anyone elaborate? When I initially read about this last week it seemed that David Posel was leaving the company. But the Bloomberg site indicates he's former C.O.O. of Cambiola and current C.O.O. of Pure Leaf Oil at Cambiola.
Poor,
Great post. The video does clear up some misconceptions relating to products offered by this company . About a week or so ago someone had complained about pricing relating to products that this company offered vs its supposed competitors. Perhaps the person was comparing apples to oranges. The video clearly indicates that this company offers some products directly to the doctors' offices. Unless the competition is doing the same and unless the competition's product is the same in dosage and/or results then its an apples/oranges comparison.
While we all must do our own due diligence and be mindful of confirmation bias, it does appear that the company is doing all the right things in terms of networking, positioning, vertical integration and strategy.
The vertical integration will certainly keep costs down. The networking will provide opportunity, save time, and should produce better marketing opportunities while educating the masses. Two very intriguing things about this company: I like the Northwell connection (though I have yet to understand clearly what it is and whether it is a formal agreement as of yet). Northwell is very influential in the NY healthcare market. I also like the connections they've made to the state of Florida. Everyone knows that Florida is a retiree haven and healthcare is a necessity for that demographic. These are facts that are absent any confirmation bias.
As for the confirmation bias, well that is up to the imagination. I imagine, as many other investors probably do that due to the opiod epidemic in this country and abroad, and due to the aging Baby Boomer Generation's quest for alternative ways to alleviate pain and other health issues, CBD has the potential to impact the investment community the way that Bitcoin and other crypto currencies did in recent years.
Very few people knew about cryptocurrencies until recently. It is that wave of investors that this industry should eventually reach. It all starts with word of mouth. Who better than the actual doctors who treat these issues? But hundreds of doctors alone will not effectively market this product on a larger scale, so, reaching out to 18000 people via video is another responsible tactic. Confirmation bias allows me to imagine Cramer mentioning this company as it makes its way onto the NASDAQ. If that is the case, a current investor need only to do the math of 4 + bucks a share at the minimum.
Exciting to think about. Good luck to all.
Sleek,
Patience is a virtue, particularly with regard to stock investments. The flip side is the act of catching a falling knife, but then again, who invests money in an OTC penny stock that they cannot expect, anticipate, or risk to lose? I too intend to outlast the supposed manipulation in this stock price. I too will be loading up on this stock while 4s and 3s are in play as long as I have the long term horizon in my sights. Heck, why not sub 1s? I would even welcome that for a great average price and if the price eventually increases and allows for them to head to the Nasdaq well then, bingo! If, if, if. I recommend the poem 'If' by Rudyard Kipling. So apt for this arena.
The gas station sales of CBD products should only increase the appeal of CANB. I suspect that CBD companies that sell to gas stations probably are not as careful as CANB in the chemistry behind the product and I suspect that the eventual regulations will sway people towards companies that can offer proof of their product's dosage like CANB ought to be able to do.
Sleek,
What I am immersing myself in this week is a podcast about CBDs. It goes back two or three years, so it will be interesting to see how the talks change since so much has happened within the last 3 years in the industry. From the outset, what I am finding from the discussions is a reliance for end-users to be able to receive the correct dosage in order to have positive effects. Additionally, the technique in which the dosage is administered can be the difference between success or failure since the acids in the stomach and intestines as well as the interactions within the liver can alter the intended dosage, if ingested. This is why the companies may come up with alternative ways to get the dosage into the body (under the tongue, or through the skin etc.
One interesting tidbit of information from a more recent podcast indicated that a European company testified in Congress recently about their ability to use CBDs in tampons. Imagine the possibilities there with pain management and with regard to limiting certain infections. I hope CANB is considering that as well.
But, that dosage concern will be vital information for doctors, patients, and government regulators, particularly when they want studies cited. This is where I see CANB in a great position. From what they were preaching in their shareholders' video it appears they are well in tune with dosage and getting the chemistry right. Whereas other companies may pump out products just to satisfy demand, CANB seems to be putting in their efforts early on to circumvent that inevitable 60 Minutes segment on the scam that is CBD dosage.
Forgive me if I err in any information on this site. I'm still learning the industry and the products.
Good luck to all
Another positive about this industry is that it appears that the end-users are the ones who are hyping this up. With some exceptions due to misinformation, misuse of product or for the fact that sometimes a product just does not gel with the individual's body, there seems to be a push by the end-user to pressure the government to change regulations regarding this industry. It also appears that those companies who are better at forecasting what type of regulations will be enacted will be in a better position as long as they align their product with those regulatory forecasts. It is my speculation that the government will proceed cautiously and will make certain that parameters are met, particularly with regard to precise dosage and a strict separation from the stigma associated with THC and its effects. This company's product seems to align with those regulatory forecasts, but then again, who knows?
From a purely speculative investment, this industry seems ripe for the picking and this company seems well positioned in the industry. I intend to load up while the price dips into the .03s. Even if it were to dip lower I would continue buying. I'm hoping nothing happens until a year after I'm finished loading up. Good luck to all. If nothing else, its fun to speculate.
Great point dirtman1.
Admittedly, it was quite annoying to have to replay certain parts of the video to understand what he was saying and as unpolished as he may have appeared in a speaking role, I have to ask whether that in itself is an incentive to stay clear of the stock. Would you rather someone who is a smooth talker? Ted Bundy was a smooth talker.
Sleek, I have to say the company seems to be making the right connections and associating themselves with some reputable companies and some reputable professionals from an array of fields. I like the positioning they've apparently achieved in the NY region with Northwell and in the Florida area with the professionals listed on their advisory board and with Senator from Florida. It all looks promising.
Of course, one can never be too naive in times like these. With associations like theirs could interfere with investors' due diligence, thus we need to proceed carefully.
Ultimately, it is an OTC stock at the moment and we all ought to know what that means. For me, I like the idea of this company and as I study it I like more and more the decisions that they are making, so I'm willing to risk what I am wiling to risk.
One person on this discussion board criticized the way some of the speakers at the board meeting speak. I do not really buy into that though. I understand that most people are not good at public speaking. In fact, studies have shown that the majority of people would choose death over public speaking, so I do not allow it to carry much weight. Also, it is very very difficult to change a lifelong accent or way in which one speaks, so I do not fault anyone on the board for speaking the way they do.
I just finished watching the last part of the video where questions were taken from the audience. One of the gentlemen asked what I did. The answer was that the three remaining needs to uplist to Nasdaq are outside board directors, 5 million in assets and a price per share of $4.00.
I just finished watching the last part of the video where questions were taken from the audience. One of the gentlemen asked what I did. The answer was that the three remaining needs to uplist to Nasdaq are outside board directors, 5 million in assets and a price per share of $4.00.
From the meeting video the speaker stated there are three things they have to meet prior to being able to uplift to the NASDAQ. I may have missed if he said the other two, but he mentioned the need for outside board members. What are the other two requirements that haven’t been met yet?
James,
Good reply. I will look into another site to make my trades. I have two accounts with them since they bought up Scott Trade. I only like TD for their think or swim but I’m annoyed at the antics which seems to be a money grab. It’s the same feeling I got when I dealt with the cable tv companies where they are always trying to angle a new scheme. If I’m willing to make a trade I’m willing to take a risk. What the hell is a phone call going to do to dissuade me from doing so. Am I to truly believe that TD is looking out for my best interests? Unreal. Anyway, what do you guys think about the other available trading sites in terms of price per trade, restrictions and screening capabilities?
Thanks for the response. Yeah, that’s concerning that it would cost more. I bought about a month ago and there was no issue. Ugh. May have to start looking at other options.
Good afternoon. I tried making a purchase through TD last week and received an error message indicating I had to go through a broker. I called TD today and was told I could make a purchase of CCTC, but I have to call them direct and speak to a trader in order to do so. Is this common? Is this because of any concern for the investor? Is this due to any algorithm that indicates that the stock is shady? I have noticed in other chatrooms for other OTC stocks that TD has done the same for those other stocks. I'm curious if anyone else has experienced this. If this is the norm, or is this only a recent practice.
AK, I think back to last month as I'm walking my stubborn bulldog, Bailey while pondering what it would be like to have double the amount of shares. I was not very confident in putting more money into it. But, I'm glad I was also able to capitalize on the recent run-up. Pending any new news we may just get our wish at that same price I considered it. I dont know if I feel good about being on the sidelines with the price hovering at .15, but if we are lucky enough to hit the magic number to jump right back in, well then, YAHOOO!
Volume is back to its pre "pump" levels. I seem to recall in 2016 that the stock price hovered around 14 to 15 for a period of time prior to dipping to the 10 cent range for several months which then had it dip further and settle mainly in the .08 to .10 range. Without any significant news history should repeat itself.
Motor,
In hindsight it appears so obvious. Yet, there was a lot of truth to what the article was stating just prior to the run up, so it was a bit deceiving. I'm sure many will agree that we were hoping this was it. This was the moment because there are some potentially positive signs out there if we are to believe the executives with their global patents and promises. (I know Cartman, I know). Of course, in hindsight, and currently, there is simply no way to justify any significant jump in PPS other than speculation. Financial analysis dictates things at the end of the day and in this case, at the end of this week perhaps. It is certainly a lesson for all. For those of you who believe in this technology or at least have hope for this technology, like myself, good luck. I do feel we are on the cusp. Whether that cusp is years away, months away, weeks away, or non-existent is what makes it somewhat fun. Slainte!
Garbone,
That's a guarantee for me. I still think this firm is onto something with their technology. We should know soon whether they can bring it up to scale. Good luck to all. I look forward to some news and some informative comments from this board. I benefited somewhat from the comments on here over the past two years. This time around I have to thank Cartman, et al. for scraping away the one-sided bias I undoubtedly had for this stock. With some more luck I will double up my shares very soon and hopefully in 366 days this baby rockets up if only for tax purposes. If it dips under .10 again, I will continue to add each month. That's the plan. We shall see. Good luck to all!
Unnecessary
Well said Cartman. It’s not for everyone but it is a good strategy unless and until viability is proven. I still like long term prospects so I will be picking up again at .08 or near that price with the profits I made on this run. I think 2019 is where we will know more about commercial viability.
Indeed. I have a vision/dream of this upcoming January's State of the Union address and President Trump speaking of beautiful clean coal and rambling on about this company based out of NYC and how they have this beauty of a patent called Pristine..... Ramble on all you'd like Mr. President. Best part about the State of the Union is that the media does not get to edit. Anyway, back to present day CCTC and how Allpennystocks.com currently has CCTC listed as its number one hot stock. Good luck to all.
Nice flag pattern that has developed each day through this trend.
Jo, According to Yahoo Finance this morning- the float is 102.96 million. 157.15 million outstanding shares. 33.33 percent held by insiders with .01% held by institutions.
I'm thinking the next level of resistance is around .26 which was met around November of 2016 if my memory serves me correctly. We are well positioned at today's close to blow past that upon a early Monday morning spike. I like the volume of over 3 million shares considering its OTC. It should put the stock in the crosshairs of many investors' screeners who do not currently have this stock in their sights.
Correction: Barchart just upped their analysis to 100 percent strong buy. Nice volume again (well, compared to just a week ago). I have a vision of the old Shuttle launches: T-minus 10 seconds.... GLTA
Barchart.com has 96 percent of theiir 'experts' saying Strong Buy.
Great collection of short stories and that final short story was something I read in my late 20s. What an epiphany, both for the story and for my own view of the world. I particularly liked the way the young female in the story basically took the main character down a few notches when she said, "The men that is now is only all palaver and what they can get out of you."
Cartman or anyone else in the know, if CCTC's product is determined to be commercially viable, where do you see the PPS initially? Clearly it should be a signifcant bump, but I recall in past posts that you or someone else had mentioned that CCTC would be bought out immediately. If so, what are the ramifications for shareholders? I know these are hypotheticals, but to me it is more informative for posts to discuss and prepare for potential actions that shareholders may need to to take. I dont normally deal in penny stocks, so forgive my ignorance on this matter.
Does anyone have an updated list of all the MOUs and of all the patent agreements that CCTC has, or can you direct me to whereever that list may be? Is there also a list of pending coutnries where CCTC will have appoved patents and pending MOUs?
Hence, timing. As for the commendable state of Washington doing their due dilligence for the health and welfare of all of us humans, I wonder how many other polluting industries Washington state's legislators ignore. The clean coal industry is considered guilty until proven innocent. That's becoming a theme by many elected leaders.
Fox News had a nice piece this morning called Coal Conflict regarding the battle between Wyoming and other states against the state of Washington and the latter state's interference with commerce. Timing. A perfect storm?
Well stated Cartman. You have been watching and commenting on this stock for a long time and over time, one gets to know the ebbs and flows, but more importantly, effectively analyzes the cause of those ebbs and flows. While there is still the potential for bias, your knowledge is based upon years of experience, particularly with this firm's stock. I've been watching this stock since 2012/2013, but only on the fringe until about 2015. It is one thing to analyze a stock from afar (not invested), and yet another to analyze it while moneys are invested. Regardless of how much we try to take the emotion out of it, it is impossible to truly do so unless we are psychopaths. So, here's to hoping there are a few psychopaths invested in this stock with a knack for investing.
The way I see it is there are four possibilities:
1-Stagnant PPS. Although this is technically a loss if you take oppurtunity cost into account, we are dealing, hopefully, with moneys that we expect to lose, but hope to gain on. Who truly cares unless this is your only investment and unless it is a large source of your money which would be a mistake anyway.
2-Loss of PPS. This, to me is the only negative possibility, thoughg it depends on frame of mind. As noted in possibility 1, if you are investing money that you 'need' then you really should not be in this stock, or any stock for that matter.
3-Increase in PPS due to investor speculation. Unless you are emotionally committed to this technology, who cares how the PPS increases? The only issue with this is how much and when to get out?
4-Increase in PPS due to a sustaining technology that is marketable and economically viable. For the longs this is the lottery.
Where I stand in this is that I am not emotionally attached to the money I've invested in this stock and I do not have a need for it, so if (1) happens, let it ride. If (2) happens, well, so be it! I will not lose sleep over it and I chalk it up to a lesson in investing, particularly with a penny stock. The most difficult consideration for me is between (3) and (4). When do I get out, or do I stay for the long run? This is more concerning to me than (1) or (2).
Its a battle, but it makes me more inclined to stay long on this stock. I think it was Whitecoal who in previous posts brought this subject up about Washington and how this certainly positions CCTC well 'if' the treated coal is not combustible and does not generate dust. However, the governor of Washington is arguing that the diesel trains themselves are polluting. Well, I'm sure his argument would be shot down in court if there are diesel trains transporting any of Washington state's goods. The bias against coal is on many fronts. Some warranted. Some not so much.
Dsaul,
Thanks to you and others for your research. One question that we ought to consider though is how much the search engines are manipulated. Inasmuch as Google seems to be the top search engine, I would not limit my research engine to just Google.
Finally some facts. Flip, it’s been 28 years for me since I worked on a concrete plant, but you are spot on with your info. I would even speculate that the additives nowadays are far more advanced than they were back then. Concrete is always curing. The question is how long is the right amount so that it is strong enough to bear the load. For that, you are spot on again. It’s up to the dude on the ground making the decisions. I must say;however, that I like the effort that people on this board are putting in. It adds to the speculation drama. We are only missing some background music.