Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Scoobey, excellent insights. This is why I believe that HISC can be viewed through the lens of fundamental analysis because it is not a typical pinkie - this company is a company that is heading towards bigger boards like the Nasdaq. The key is if Moody can continue to utilise his excellent management skills + bring in the big sales coming, then HISC will be a very profitable long term hold indeed.
Not at all happydog...I'm really curious now as to what the new BB company OS would be. That would confirm or deny what I am suspecting to be the case.
Chuck, thanks. We have to see OS of new company to see whether I'm right. If I'm right, we should see a run up of new company.
Happydog, we are not just "gaining one cent" - that is technically true...but I believe that the new BB company is being set up for a run. See my post 28334 - I believe that Frank and Tom wants to keep the OS of the new company low and let it go up from there, hence the 1 for 50 dividend. Tom's shares would also be worth more - that would explain why he is willing to take stock in new BB company rather than cash - he expects the stock to go up over time, if not in the near future.
Ok folks, please correct me if I'm wrong...but I get the idea that Frank and Tom are positioning the new company for sustained growth in the share price in the way they have managed the creation of the new company.
Just look at the numbers.
The new company will have an OS of 47.22 million. 17.22 million shares will be created for issuance to HISC shareholders (861 million divided by 50), while I believe that Actsoft will have 30 million shares (I'm assuming that Tom Mitchell still values his company at $15 million, so he gets 30 million shares of the new company since opening price at BB is 50 cents per share). I'm not sure whether any more parties (owner of BB company?) will be getting shares. If so, then OS might rise higher, but if it is just a shell without any revenue, I cannot see a significant addition to the OS.
More importantly, see what the new merged company will be getting in return. They will be getting all the software side of the HISC/Actsoft partnership, namely the $25 million in revenue that Actsoft is projecting to do this year + all the monthly software revenue that will come from the CTs etc. So we are getting a company with projected revenues of at least $25+++ million (and I think Actsoft can meet the $25 million quite easily)....with an opening market cap of only $23.6 million. If I take Actsoft profit margins of 36-41% (ok, once again, conservative me will use 30%)...that translates into 2006 profits of $7.5 million. 2006 EPS is then projected to be 15.9 cents per share! A P/E of 30 gives me a price of $4.77 (0.159 x 30) while a conservative discounted cash flow model (5% annual growth and 8% long bond rate) gives me a price of $5.30 ($0.159/[0.08-0.05] = $5.30)
Now tell me, doesn't 50 cents for the new company sound undervalued?
Neutral, yes I noticed it as well. One thing is for sure - whatever the MMs were doing on the AH trades, it seems that they are done with it. What is interesting is that most of those AH trades occurred before the run up - something tells me that there was some kind of accumulation in anticipation of whatever good news is coming for this company. Best part is...whatever big news the MMs might be expecting...has not been announced yet. We shall then see what it is that might be making the MMs excited.
Yes, volume is fantastic today - the highest by far over last 13-14 trading days. Closing above 6.1 cents gives us excellent technicals foundation (above 200 MA) for news to come, closing HOD will also set the tone for any news this week.
The AH trades should be interesting!
We are at 6.6 cents. LOL!
6.5 cents wall is crumbling...only 2 MMs left
We're now at 6.5 cents
Hey Sans, dig this...6.4 cents wall is crumbling...only 1 MM left.
You too fenwah? Don't let Spence get you going too! LOL!
Hey Spence, MMs have seen your posts and are having a field day pumping you up with their trading! Its getting real good. 6.3/6.4 cents now. I want this to hold above 200-day SMA when trading closes...preferably HOD. And then see some sweet AH trades above closing price. LOL!
Spencer, we just hit 6.3 cents and holding strong. Simple 200-day MA is 6.1 cents. Hold above that at end of day and the technicals look excellent.
Kook, see neutral's post - he has done all the hard work. What I think is very significant is that the price of trades done at after hours actually went up. No big 700,000 blocks this time, but 2 200K+ blocks at 5.5 cents. Closing price was 5.4 cents.
Kook, cannot agree with you more. The technicals are looking better and better, while we all already know about the solid fundamentals + potential HISC has.
Also note that volume has been increasing steadily since 30 Mar 06, the last day trading hit below 6 million volume.
DATE VOLUME (in millions)
30-Mar 5.71
31-Mar 8.55
3-Apr 9.54
4-Apr 10.67
5-Apr 11.33
6-Apr 18.38
7-Apr 16.99
8-Apr??? 16.8 already
This is a sure sign of rising retail interest (and buyback started?) - the coming days/weeks will be most interesting!
P.S. - Did you see my earlier post on AH trades? Its rising as a percentage of total volume again (more than 8% of total volume last Friday) but more significantly, the MMs are finally allowing the after hours to trade HIGHER.
Neutral, what's really interesting is that in the last 13 trading days (including 7 Apr 06), 7 Apr 06 was the first day that witnessed AH trades moving higher as opposed to just trading flat or lower (when we say the now infamous 700,000 AH trades going on at prices below the closing price). Also, its the first day again from the previous 2 days that AH trades have shot up above 8% of total volume. This time round, unlike the previous 700,000 AH trades, the price for the AH trades is allowed to trade higher.
I am wondering whether this means that MMs are slowly allowing this to take off...hmmm...its really making me wonder...of course, all in my own humble opinion only...anyone with good knowledge of MM trading patterns and signals are most welcome to contribute...
Volume continues the rising trend (highest over last 12 trading days - 18.38 million) while AH-trades for second day in a row have dropped to insignificant levels (405,000, or 2.2% of total volume, all done at 1600 hrs - no more 700,000 trades).
The consistently rising volume with steadily rising prices is a good sign - shows HISC is finally getting noticed.
I meant 2 significant things about the trading in recent days....not just the last 3 days....quick fingers there...LOL!
Has anyone noticed 2 significant things about the trading in the last 3 days?
Firstly, for the first time over the last 11 trading days, there have been no 700,000 AH-trades today. Only 3 small, insignificant trades (and all done at 1600 hrs)today for the first time since the last 10 trading days that AH-trades have made up less than 1% of total volume. Is someone done buying?
Secondly, trading volume has been creeping up slowly but surely. From the last 11 trading days: From an average of 7.13 million per day from the 1st 6 trading days (22 Mar to 29 Mar) to an average of 9.16 million per day over the last 5 trading days (30 Mar to 5 Apr). A 28.5% rise. More significantly, the volume has been rising steadily since 30 Mar (5.71m, 8.55m, 9.54m, 10.67m, 11.33m). I do recall that this steady rise in volume had also preceded that huge run from 2+ cents to 14 cents - could the same thing happen again?
All of the above in my opinion of course and should not be construed as a buy or sell recommendation.....
Kook, I have also submitted my collation earlier. Its all thanks to the sharp observation from you and Kook that we are know this now. My numbers are slightly different from yours as I noticed there were some remnants of after-hours trade as well at 1600, 1601, 1602 - I have added them in too as I'm not sure where that is coming from. But certainly, by far, the now infamous 700,000 trades make up the bulk of the AH trades.
The total I have found is 9.03 million.
I'm really wondering what is going on in these AH trades...the other thing that I cannot get out of my mind was your earlier comment that the last time you saw this was the time before HISC ran from 2+ cents to 14 cents (please correct me if I'm wrong here). I have a funny feeling that this might just happen again.....all in my opinion of course...
Neutral, you're welcome. Hope Jersey found it useful - he might be on to something! 9 million shares is a big amount to have - around an average whole day's volume in the last ten days.
I'm still most fascinated by Kook's observation earlier that the last time he saw this was before that big run from 2+ cents to 14 cents (Kook, correct me if I have gotten this wrong or out of context) - its just something I cannot get out of my mind.
Jersey. here is the info you need. Many thanks in advance to Kook and Neutral for first pointing this out and attracting my attention to this strange occurence (AH Trades).
I don't have 3 weeks, but I have been collating in a spreadsheet the cumulative size of the after hour trades over the last 10 trading days (about 2 trading weeks) - the total of AH trades stand over the last 10 trading days stand at 9.03 million as of today.
I just calculated all the trades done from 1600 hours onwards - on some those days, there were quite a few more done at 1600, 1601, 1602 etc besides the now famous 700,000 trades. I have also done a percentage calculation of the AH trades as a percentage of total volume for that day. All info is from otcbb.com.
I find this percentage most interesting - it is so huge (more than 8% consistently before 31 Mar when out volume has not picked up significantly). Many of the stocks that I am monitoring in the pinks/otcbb rarely show such a huge percentage of AH trades vis-a-vis total volume, be they running or stagnant stocks. I wonder whether something is going on....
I have bolded the AH trades so that it stands out in the chart below. Not quite sure how the blue colour ended up on the percentage column but oh well.....hope you find this useful.
DATE Volume AH Trades Percentage
22-Mar 3.91 0.7 17.9%
23-Mar 8.83 1.36 15.4%
24-Mar 8.32 1.03 12.4%
27-Mar 7.89 0.7 8.9%
28-Mar 5.79 1.4 24.2%
29-Mar 8.03 0.7 8.7%
30-Mar 5.71 0.7 12.3%
31-Mar 8.55 1.05 12.3%
3-Apr 9.54 0.7 7.3%
4-Apr 10.67 0.69 6.5%
Neutral, you're most welcome! Great job on the CT evolution by the way...really shows that HISC's R&D and capitalisation costs have not been in vain!
Wow...thanks RCP. Truly an honour to be recognised in such a way. Will certainly spur me to do better! Don't forget that its a learning process for me as well - so please correct me on my figures if there is anything that I'm using that is unrealistic.
Oh - and this post goes out to everyone except Jag! Sorry dude, you don't get to play! LOL!
RCP, you got mail (eom)
Kook, Starboy, balihi
You are most welcome! Glad to contribute really...
I really cannot wait for the sales numbers to start rolling in over the next few weeks....but in the immediate future, the merger news, name of the merger company, the uplist to BB and dividend in the new company will help us along just fine....
Jersey...just a slight problem. I'm not allowed to do that (send PMs) as I am not a paying I-Hub member. Will probably upgrade my account soon given that I am being dragged into I-Hub faster than I thought! But for now, would be really grateful if you could send me an email or you could PM me an email that you are comfortable giving to me, and I will send you something for you to have a look at and which I need to ask your opinion on.
Yes, I understand that. That is their job and they are paid to do just that - bash and spread negativity and irritate the longs or scare away the newcomers. We will ignore them as newbies or board members can judge whose posts they would rather read. I have also heard that they are paid by per response so it is good that we do not reply to them using the "reply" button, but should just type a new message if we want to retort them while ensuring they do not get paid. My sympathies though but appreciative thanks to board moderators like RCP who moderate these boards and have to constantly engage these bashers and put them in their place.
Jersey, please email me as soon as possible at stronglong8888@yahoo.com. I need to clarify with you something about HISC's recent trading pattern and also on HISC's sales target for 2006.
Thanks much in advance!
Warmest regards,
Stronglong
Sailman, Dallas1, exisnet, starsshines4us, Spencer, fenwah, rob3115, RCP, rangers684, Minddoc7, superlumeny, droneputt, seeker777, emilson.
Thanks much for the kind words - they will only serve to make me want to do better next time round. Please correct me as well if there is anything that is way off in my analysis as this is a learning process for me too. RCP and KOOK have taught me much about HISC earlier on, and this is just my way of passing on and sharing what I can to everyone. I am also most appreciative of all the efforts of I-Hub members who have visited HISC, their exhibitions, conferences, shareholder meetings and shared their reports - I am based overseas and clearly have to rely on such upfront DD by these people to make my assessments of this company on the qualitative front.
Jagman - I will only say this once to you before ignoring you. If you want to challenge the analysis, then please put more thought into it and debate at an appropriate intellectual level rather than just coming out with that completely unsubstantive post. Unless you have no idea of what I'm talking about in my post and what rudimentary financial analysis is...which could explain why you have to work as a $2 an hour basher about to run out of a job. You have already bothered enough RCP and many good intentioned folks on this board who have been most gracious in allowing a person of your intellect to debate them...I suggest you leave while you can with whatever semblance of dignity you have left before you lose your bet with RCP and get banished in humiliation. Or if you are really unfortunate, you meet Jersey first! LOL!
Ok folks, here is my take on HISC’s 2005 Annual Report. Many thanks to all who have alerted everyone on I-Hub that the report is out. Have to warn you first...this is a bit long.
Before I begin, would like to state that I am trying to give a balanced (i.e. strengths, weakness, opportunities and risks) view of the company from what I have dug out of the report. I hope this will help shed more light on the fundamentals of the company and what all of us could be looking out for in the months to come to measure the company’s progress. Please note that one great thing about finally seeing the 2005 Annual Report is that we finally have some hard numbers to play with, get the key ratios and most importantly, use these numbers as a base year (compare the company’s progress in 2006 and beyond). The progress of the company can now finally be measured in hard, tangible numbers, with 2005 as a base year (starting year of operations).
I say this now and I will say it at the end again: please note that the analysis I am giving below is not a buy or sell recommendation. Everything in this post is solely my own thoughts on HISC and in my opinion only.
Ok here goes…
STRENGTHS
(1) For a base year (start up year), the company is doing extremely well. It is already profitable ($618,637 profits, on sales of $3.4 million), a rare occurrence for new companies. The Profitability and Solvency ratios are excellent for a new start up.
(2) The key profitability ratios: Profit margins are great (although lower than my original estimate of 25%, 18% is still very good and offers a good economic moat). ROE (23.3%) and ROA (14.8%) are impressive, showing that they are not relying too much on raising equity (excessive selling of shares) or issuing debt.
(3) The key solvency ratios: Current ratio (3.35) and quick ratio (1.64) are excellent. These numbers are usually associated with blue chip companies, not start ups. This is thanks to HISC management having judiciously avoided debt while making good progress in pushing sales ($3.4 million, as limited as it might be, it helps support the firm in its start up stage), generating profits ($618,637, precious cash) and bolstering cash flow – the life blood of all firms.
(4) The Debt-Equity ratio is similarly encouraging. At 14.7%, or 0.147, this is way below the prudent ratio level of 50% suggested by the international debt rating agencies, Moody’s and S&P.
(5) Management has kept costs largely in check, given that most of the expenses for a new company come from selling, general and administrative expenses (SGA) and R&D costs. SGA makes up a relatively comfortable 66% of total revenue, although I expect this percentage to drop when the company expands its sales at a faster pace than SGA rising this year. R&D costs appear to have been capitalized as well with its proprietary software capitalized to the tune of almost $1 million. I expect R&D costs to fall significantly as well as a percentage of total revenues given that the CT is ready to launch on a nationwide scale.
(6) HISC appears to be an asset light business, with fixed assets of only $168,564 needed to generate sales of $3.4 million in 2005. This is a fantastic sales/assets ratio (20.2) as it shows that the company will not be burdened by huge fixed asset investments in the future to generate their sales growth. Warren Buffet loves such “asset light to generate huge sales” businesses.
(7) The OS remains at a decent level (862 million) compared to many pink sheet companies I have seen that issued billions and billions of shares. While I’m marginally disappointed that the OS has risen a bit, I’m nevertheless encouraged that the proceeds from the sales of stock in 2005 has been used wisely; namely to build up its inventories and capitalize its software. These two alone took up almost $2 million of the $3 million raised through share sales, but will stand us in good stead as the company aggressively sells its products (inventories are ready to go + software R&D is completed) – you have already seen from Neutral’s earlier pictures on how the CT has evolved! More importantly, unlike fruits and vegetables, these inventories will not rot in the near term if somehow the company does not achieve its sales targets, an event in any case that I regard as unlikely.
So the main encouraging thing I take from this report is that HISC is a company that has been generating sales, turning out a profit, have a decent asset base vis-à-vis its liabilities and maintaining a prudent debt level. This means that the company is on a sound financial footing in the near term, with little risk of bankruptcy. I must highlight again that its really encouraging that many of the financial ratios and numbers quoted above are numbers commonly associated with blue chips, and not new start-ups whom usually need to take on high levels of debt and sell shares continuously to compensate for the lack of sales or cash flows in the development stage. HISC has successfully prepared a good foundation from which they can grow their business.
WEAKNESS
(1) As with all development stage companies, a lot of cash has been used up to purchase inventories, capitalizing their software and paying operating expenses (as seen in the Cash Flow Statement). While this is a good thing as it positions the company for rapid growth, the company cash level is low ($279,890). If they need more cash, it can only be through either increased sales (which I am expecting) or increased debt and equity financing. Sales numbers and new contracts will be crucial in the months ahead.
RISKS
(1) The company is not able to bring in new sales or sign new contracts. An unlikely event in my opinion, but nevertheless still a risk.
(2) The company might need to issue new shares or take on debt to meet operating expenses (SGA or R&D) if sales or new cash do not come in.
OPPORTUNITIES
(1) Uplist to BB will improve HISC’s standing among investors and create new awareness of this stock.
(2) Sales numbers are expected to accelerate from here. The annual report noted the backlog of $8 million from Pro Sec, so we can already assume that that is in the bag. So at the very least, we already have $8 million in the bag. This is not even including the expected $25 million + the numerous other deals signed with Rentrop Tugboats etc that will add to their sales numbers. We have at least a 900-1000% growth in sales numbers from 2005 for 2006 (from $3.4 million to at least $33 million once the ActSoft deal goes through).
(3) Sprint/Nextel have just commenced marketing the CT to the nation-wide market. A good boost to sales can be expected here given their numerous outlets. How much – I have no idea at the moment.
(4) The Army is reportedly testing the CT in September/October. That would be huge for sales if they take it up.
(5) New markets seem to be opening up for HISC on a weekly basis. From ports, to ship companies, to phone companies, to police, to army, to even boy scouts! – the possibilities seem to be endless. Its now up to HISC to seize these opportunities
-------------------------------
Ok, now to revising my valuation of the company. The difference from my earlier analysis is that I have:
(1) Revised the profit margin downwards (25% to 20%) to be extremely conservative
(2) Expected revenues stay the same ($55 million)
(3) OS revised upwards (770 million to 861 million)
(4) Growth of 3% annually for next 5-10 years used for my discounted cash flow analysis instead of 0% growth previously used as that is not realistic for a growth company (for sales to stay stagnant at a low base). However, to be conservative, I’m using a 3% annual growth instead of the 10% annual growth that HISC should comfortably hit as a rapid growth company over the next 5-10 years.
(5) Overall valuation range in my opinion is now 25-38 cents, a change from 22-53 cents earlier. I have decided to be more conservative on the higher end and more realistic on the lower end to reflect the greater shine given in recent weeks to HISC’s growth prospects over the longer term but at the same time, add more conservatism on the margins and earnings growth that HISC might enjoy this year.
REVENUES/PROFITS/MARGINS
First, the expected profit margins:
- I am revising the profit margins down from 25% to 20%. Existing margins are 18%, but I am expecting the ActSoft sales inclusion to raise the margins given that ActSoft’s margins have been around 36 to 41%. To be really, really conservative, I will just take 20% as a guide for 2006.
Second, the expected revenues:
- To me, the company’s projected revenue target for 2006 is still $55 million, until someone tells me otherwise. We already have revenues of $8 million (Pro Sec) + XPress ($500,000) + ActSoft ($25 million expected once it goes through) in the bag for 2006. That alone is worth $33.5 million. So there is another $21.5 million worth of sales to go. Some confirmed orders that have come in but no numbers yet include Coxsackie Transport, Garda World, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Knox County Tennessee School System, and the Chili House Restaurant chain in Amman, Jordan.
Thirdly, the expected profits:
From the use of 20% profit margin as a guide and assuming the $55 million revenue is met (to be monitored as 2006 moves along), then we have expected profits of $11 million for 2006.
VALUATION
OS is now at 861 million, up from the 770 million figure I used earlier. As I have stated earlier, this is always tricky, but I will continue to use my 2 earlier valuation models.
(1) The first is the standard P/E ratio of 30-40 applied to fast growing small/micro cap companies in the US (which HISC belongs to). To be conservative, I will use 30.
So with expected profits of $11 million in 2006, that translates into EPS of 1.28 cents. Multiply that by a P/E of 30, and we get an expected share price of $0.38, or 38 cents.
(2) The second is the very conservative discounted cash flow model - I will just assume a modest 3% earnings growth to infinity (very modest considering that most of us who invest expect to see HISC growing faster than that annually over the next 5-10 years). This essentially is the model that Buffet uses in analysing the value of a company over the long run. And since I expect HISC products to be in the marketplace and to be in great demand for some time (because of the wide variety of uses that the CT can be used for), I think this is a fair extremely conservative model to use.
Essentially, the maths would be:
EPS of 1.28 cents for 2006
Discounted rate of 8% (I will be conservative - the historical average 30-year long bond rate over the last 50 years or so has always been around 6-8%, unlike the 5.93% now)
So, 1.28/(0.08 – 0.03) = $0.256 or 25.6 cents
So on both models with conservative assumptions, I personally do find HISC to be relatively undervalued at 4.1 cents (you might of course disagree with me...) now given the expected merger with ActSoft, uplist to BB and the sales numbers coming in over the next few weeks/months.
Will continue monitoring the sales figures carefully and update this model as new numbers come in.
Do let me know if there is anything wrong with the analysis above – I am still looking to humbly learn if there is anything that is way off. As always, bashers, please stay away!
I must warn the bashers not to take my post out of context as I WILL come down hard on you. If I am not around, then you can bet your a** that RCP will! LOL!
Don’t forget…..please do not buy or sell HISC based on my analysis above. I am NOT making a buy or sell recommendation. Everything in this post is solely my own thoughts on HISC and in my opinion only.
Warmest regards,
Stronglong
--------------------------------------------
For all you mathematical buffs out there, here are some of my workings:
Outstanding Shares = 862 million
Profitability Ratios
Net profit margin = 618,637/3,446,921 = 17.95% = 18%
ROE = Net Income/Equity = 618,637/2,657,765 = 23.3%
ROA = Net Income/Total Assets = 618,637/4,184,068 = 14.8%
Solvency Ratios
Current Ratio = Current Assets/Current Liabilities = 4,015,504/1,197,099 = 3.35
Quick Ratio = Quick Assets/Current Liabilities = Cash + Account Receivables/Current Liabilities = 1,963,062/1,197,099 = 1.64
Leverage Ratios
Debt/Equity Ratio = Total Debt/Total Equity = Long Term Liabilities + Short Term Debt/Total Equity = 329,204 + 62,583/2,657,765 = 14.7% or 0.147.
Bid/Ask is now 0.039/0.041. We might be able to close at 0.04 today. Trading looks fairly steady...will be interesting to see the after hours trades again today.
seeker777, see post 25611 by Jersey
Jersey, would be grateful if you could email me at stronglong8888@yahoo.com. Need to seek your thoughts about HISC's recent trading patterns and some sales targets that the company has put out.
Thanks much!
RCP, I know exactly what you mean! Scrapping around for some spare pennies right now....LOL! The presentation shows that they have a comprehensive marketing plan in place, rather than just talk. I really cannot wait for the sales numbers to start coming in over the next few months...the army testing the CT would especially serve to generate more interest and awareness of this company.
Once again, thanks much for uploading the presentation for all to see.
Scoobey-do/Spencer, thanks for your posts. Apologies for the delayed replies as I just got back from a business trip. I will certainly be looking forward to any new info and numbers in the next few days that I can lay my hands on (hopefully from the company direct) and do more research from there.
I'm starting to have a really good feeling about this company - we could be on the verge of a takeoff (Sprint/Nextel rollout, BB Uplist etc) and it is exciting to be there right from the very beginning if the company can just grow and grow....
Lets see what happens in the weeks ahead. All the best to all of you!
Hey RCP, thanks in advance for putting it up. Cannot wait to see what's in there. Congrats as well on the new addition - the colt looks great!
Sanswired/HISCRider, thanks for getting the powerpoint to RCP - you guys are great! The snippets of info that Sanswired just put up from the powerpoint presentation is most interesting!
Thanks guys! But seriously, I was really hoping he added something to that assessment, I could have then learnt something there - but it just looked the same! Oh well...
I'm going to update that analysis once the company comes up with 2005 numbers and hopefully some extra sales numbers after 30th March.
Btw Saturn, I like your sign-off! Looks familiar! LOL!
hahagreen, didn't I do this valuation model earlier on 3 Mar 06?
See link below:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=9996256
Did you add anything to it?