Read more:

http://www.eteligis.com/ViewSubmission.aspx?submissionRequest=25053

How come those last 2 EWSI PRs are not posted on iHub?

It looks like their O/S is basically unchanged from 3 months ago and their revenue increased. Yes it's nothing crazy in the 10s of millions but it's a start. Still hoping the last 2 quarters for the year will be huge. Not happy with the net losses either but according to the 10q, each ePlant can generate up 36 million if run continuously and up to 9 million if run through shifts. Having the appropriate feedstock will likely be the bottleneck. Right now, they have 2 in the US and are apparently planning their ePlant in Europe. Their partnership with Loyalty equipment would allow them to deploy within 6 months.

SEC? Show me they are being investigated. And what do you call actually creating a facility with real employees? That's a lot of work for a scam penny stock. Post something with proof.

EWSI is essentially a startup in a field that has historically been difficult to gain a significant foothold in. This is not going to be a smooth ride but the returns could be huge. EWSI is actually trying to do something with substance. In the OTC, where companies announce they will enter in the marijuana business just to get more buyers, EWSI's attempt to create something real is rare. Look at their actual physical activities - the ewaste facility grand opening, the different collection events, the partnerships with entities like Goodwill, etc. The accounting aspect could have gone better but they are learning and adjusting. This stuff takes time and a lot of headaches but it could be all worth it. Fortunately, at these share prices the risk is minimal.

You like to write as if only your view is correct just as how you see the longs have impaired vision because of their desire to see only what they want to see. EWSI has real operations with real employees. Have you been to their facilities? Can you not see that your vision is also skewed?

EWSI has conducted interviews and posted their own letters to shareholders saying what they needed to say regarding issues written about in this article but not directly addressing this article. Do companies directly address every article written about their company? No. Especially not directly. Reread EWSI's PRs and letters, and you'll see EWSI had presented their side.

Something to do with the new OTCQB rules where the min bid needs to be above 0.01 at some point within I think a 30 day range. Someone confirm this please. Thank you

EWSI

Has it been confirmed they are moving to the pinks?

There is value. Do not forget that EWSI has actual operations and facilities unlike the vast majority of OTC stocks.

Disproportionately high? Are you an expert on how much consultants should be paid? The answer is likely "no" and what you say is all guessing and conjecture but passed as researched facts which they are not.

"Short term" being the key words here.

Would you mind PMing me the reasons also? Thank you in advance.

Prior correctness does not gurantee future correctness

Doubtful.

So how much are you getting paid to bash this stock or how low do you need this to go before you buy in?

The truth? Laughable.

That is the exact generic response the SEC will send. Thank you for posting that.

Yea I'm sure that was their reply. Their replies are always generic like, "we will look into the matter." Enough with your shenanigans.

EWSI, outside of its share price, is not the company it was at the end of 2011 and 2012. It has grown quite a bit since then particularly its facility in Ohio and its operations in China. Yea, sure there are the accounting issues in China right now, but once those are resolved, EWSI will be at a different level.

show us your math.

You have been really busy on this board. Is the PPS not low enough for you yet?

Apparently you don't read your own posts but you are good at stickying them.

Yes.

So you're saying filing an audited financial is meaningless? Do you actually read what you post?

"nowhere to be seen/in sight/to be found"

http://www.macmillandictionary.com/us/dictionary/american/nowhere

OR. IS. IT?


and it's "sight" not "site"

When you post "must read" to something, maybe you shouldn't link another board ? Or is that what you really think passes for good DD?

Maybe you should stop putting words in his mouth. Cut and paste his quote if that exists

So says the Mod who stickies his own posts. Bravo.

Unfortunately, the only point when they will go away is when they really do think the company is worthless. They are only here because EWSI is capable of climbing up for them to reap some kind of benefit.

Nah.

EWSI event:

http://www.ewastesystems.com/wp-content/uploads/Immaculate-Conception-Event.pdf

Nah those revenues will be fixed in second quarter

Yea? Post your proof.

Nope.

Have insiders sold? I don't see any proof :(