Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Has anyone ever told you that you are... (I see a deletion coming)
Oh sweetie punkin pie...
Cassandra, Cassandra, wherefore art thou, Cassandra?
FYI: it is up to THE LAW and not necessarily the judge. If a trial judge fails to act according to a state law then an appeals court will do it for them.
Conversely, when a judge was not provided all information regarding a case, such as when a plaintiff's attorney FAILS to advise the judge that the defendant was NOT PROPERLY SERVED notice of an ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED hearing, well, a judge has no problem setting aside his/her decision since, after all, THAT IS THE LAW.
PS: all of PV's info had been updated accordingly for some time.
Truth, justice oh and FACT...the American way!!!
The case information provided by Miami-Dade courts reflects to 6/26/2012--"Demand for Jury Trial". After an objection was submitted 2/14/2013 there was little to no activity for apx. nine months.
Suddenly, things spring back into life. But, we are far from a determination as the next activity scheduled calls for a hearing.
As what has been disseminated about the Texas case (Meredith), just because a case has been filed with the courts does it mean the case has merit. On the contrary as a matter of fact--often times a plaintiff will submit false information to the courts under the assumption that it would be impossible to disprove. Such people are sometimes successful in defrauding a court of law.
And then there are those that fail miserably at such attempts to defraud the courts and get a whole lot of something for nothing. Like those who sell the same guarantees multiple times, to multiple entities. Tsk, tsk.
PVEC
It always helps a claim when false information and LIES are not filed as evidence to the claim.
I wonder, how I wonder, what the court will see fit to do once the proof is in the hands of the Judge?
That is NOT a court document! Courts always stamp evidence with a date/time stamp. An official notice that is has been accepted as evidence.
THAT IS NOT A COURT DOCUMENT that you uploaded.
Yes. They have been uploaded to the Facebook page. These and more will be made available on the PVEI site soon.
insert-text-here
Okie dokie.
As a matter of fact, I am working on that on our forum right now (documents uploading as I type). I hope to have this completed within the next fifteen minutes or so.
You are welcome. Taking a break here and there for the holidays notwithstanding, the company personnel are working 12-16 hours a day, six, sometimes seven days a week. Despite what has been said, visitors are welcomed. Actually, invited. The company has nothing to hide.
We (the company) were there until nearly 9PM Sunday, 8:00AM Monday until after 5PM. Not a single shareholder showed up. Additionally, though I was not present on Saturday, staff were there until after 7PM Saturday.
We did receive email explaining delayed flights. Otherwise, we heard or saw nothing of shareholders.
Well, Seaam, the arguments are not with the court documents. The arguments are against the FORGED and FRAUDULENT documents submitted to the courts. Now, explanation of that is going to be very interesting.
IBS? Get your facts straight (or non-facts should I say).
I could file a complaint with the courts, provide them with a boatload of documents for said filing. Now, whether or not those documents are legitimate is something altogether different.
You do know that it is a CRIME to file forged & otherwise FRAUDULENT documents with any court of any land in any state, don't you?
No, of course I am not saying that. The company is moving forward. As it has been pointed out, the company has had to make some modifications as we work with the authorities to fully identify all of the illegal activities and the parties involved. But, these modifications coupled with some recently implemented restructuring is what is allowing the company to move forward. Had such not been done, is it feasible to say that it may have taken a lot longer to move full steam ahead. Such is not the case however.
PVEI IS MOVING FORWARD.
There are a number of issues with the promissory note Seaam posted. Some obvious. Others not so obvious. But, this is not the promissory note in question.
To answer the question for YA, the promissory notes are a major problem because due to the ILLEGAL conversion HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF SHARES were issued to PERSONS THAT SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN ISSUED SHARES. FREE TRADING SHARES THAT WERE ILLEGALLY OBTAINED.
Hundreds and hundreds of millions of shares. Issued illegally. Shares the company is working feverishly to recover!!!
That is of SIGNIFICANT importance to the company and its LEGITIMATE shareholders.
Thank you again. Feel free to keep these coming. The more the merrier as a matter of fact.
Thank you!!!!!
Waiting.....
Please, publish away. My finger is on the screen shot button (be sure to include the case number as well).
Precisely. Since the notes were satisfied on 23 August 2013, a year after Turner was TERMINATED from the company, how in the world would he have any information pertaining to the promissory notes? Any at all? How can he state whether or not the notes were satisfied or in default?
The notes were satisfied. The notes were then sold multiple times and illegally converted.
That is hysterical (like inferring that Steinback is no longer the CFO)!
PVEC!
Re: FINRA "Investigation" of PVEI:
In early September 2013, FINRA initiated a review of information contained in a 27 June PR released by the company. During this review, FINRA was provided with all information requested, including all documentation to attest to the legitimacy of the announcement and the contact details of all parties, whether foreign or domestic, connected to the transaction. All information sought by FINRA was provided and this includes communications with the Bahamian Ministry of Tourism & the Ministry of Transport.
Since after providing the requested information on 16 September and conducting a conference call with FINRA there has been nothing else required by FINRA to date, PVEI considers FINRA's request to be satisfied and the matter closed.
PVEC
It is not uncommon for companies to insist the individual(s) that wish to meet with a company or its representatives provide proof of identity AND sign a roster.
The company is well within its right to request such. If a visitor has nothing to hide, then providing the required identification should be no problem.
PVEC
Allow me to inform you that FINRA, the SEC, the FBI, the DOJ, etc., do not discuss the details of investigations with anyone outside of investigation. Since you mention Damian Conway, providing his contact details, and Damian is indeed the individual that handled the review, submitted to PVEC on 11 September 2013 with a full response offered by PVEC on 16 September 2013, it begs the questions:
HOW DO YOU KNOW WHO LEAD THE REVIEW/INVESTIGATION THAT YOU HAVE BEEN MENTIONING FOR THE PAST SEVERAL WEEKS? How did you know that a so-called "whistle-blower" contacted FINRA with mis-information that was REFUTED by the company and when a REVIEW was initiated (again, you have been pretty specific with claims of "several" or ""many" months).
How could you have possibly known who lead the review? How long since the review was initiated? That there was INDEED a review (investigation)? They receive tips every day at FINRA and many of which are logged, never to be acted upon. How in the world did YOU know that such a review was a reality? A review, that was satisfied in SEPTEMBER!
Thank you for posting this information for all of us to review and screen shot.
PVEC
How about you just join us for a meeting on 22 or 23 December? Easy enough to resolve.
Have your photo ID ready when you enter the door.
PVEC
Let us provide the simple Investopedia explanation of "dilution". Again, the simple approach to understanding what "dilution" really is all about.
The remaining points are moot. In time, all will be revealed to attest to such.
Your assertion is FALSE!
HMMMMMM......
PVEC
Actually, dilution is only toxic when the increase serves no purpose other than to line the pockets of a corrupt CEO or is never invested in a manner that will allow for the generation of revenue. This is not the case with PVEC. PVEC is a development stage company, dilution is oft times necessary to allow the company to move beyond development stage. That is a REALITY of a penny stock company. Anyone investing in a penny stock should understand that.
The actual FINRA numbers indeed show a SIGNIFICANT short position in PVEC as with many companies.
This company's stock, as with MANY, has been heavily manipulated thereby further increasing the need for dilution.
What is your next point?
PVEC
XNRG!
XUN
Manipulation. Nothing but.
PVEC
That is absolutely correct. I do hold shares in this company and have so for quite a while. However, I have stopped trading.
I thank you for your compliment!
PVEC
I was not present at the office at the time of your visit.
PVEC
It is both--the website will serve customers (final details being worked out as noted with the encryption securing transactions and it will communicate with shareholders to assist with allaying concerns they may have based on misleading information posted elsewhere. Both customers & shareholders are very important to the company.
PVEC
I suppose in my pursuit to respond to all of the other misinformation that had been posted about the company, I overlooked that in this particular reference you were alleging something nefarious. For that I humbly apologize. Mistakes do happen.
PVEC
It should be understood, too, that certain measures must be taken once such a vessel has been purchased before it can be moved. These measures are to protect all parties involved in sale/purchase of the vessel. Unfortunately, there are times when such matters can take a little longer than anticipated.
PVEC
Substantiate please (by way of FINRA released verification and not an OTCMarkets claim.)
XNRG
Once again, my participation and communications with any and all parties pertaining to PVE have been done within the confines of the law. Any subsequent information I made available by way of this forum were done so within the confines of the law. There has been no misconduct on the part of the company or myself. The efforts I engaged could have been done by any shareholder.
End of story.
PVEC
Nope.
PVEC.
Legally speaking, you might be amazed at how germane, what you have just confirmed is. Thank you.
PVEC
DO WHAT? The daily numbers FINRA makes available are not real? So, you're saying that on a daily basis FINRA posts erroneous shorting numbers?
That is what you're asserting?Hmmmmmmmm.
Uhhh, FINRA <----- CLICK HERE FOR FINRA'S RELEASE. Tis updated daily.
PVEC