Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I have no idea what festivus is and I have no intentions to argue but yes I was going to give a note
But ultimately it didn’t happen
You’re correct I did think about it but it never happened. Check the filings as you will see
For complete transparency I am Jason Ruppert and I have nothI got to do with this company and never gave them a note. I only am seeing this because I know iglow hates me and I follow his posts about me. I was asked from a completely nuetral person for Calvin and I to lend money. BUT IT NEVER HAPPENED and I haven’t spoken to Calvin Ross in over a year. I have no idea if this company is good or bad but do not hurt or Bestos company because you think I am involved I have no dealings with them whatsoever
I will not post or respond anymore so no one gets the wrong idea
Interesting but that note your showing never happened and Jason Ruppert has nothing to do
With this company or stock. I would suggest you check the filings and you will not even see this supposed note from 2 years ago or any other note ever for. 75k
kIM IS NOT REQUIRED TO ATTEND A CIVIL HEARING BUT HIS LAWYER CLAIMED DUE PROCESS ADN THAT HE WANTED TO COME SO IT GOT RESET.
The results are in here is what happened at the court hearing against NGCG in Broward County Court today. Tom Kim was the CEO was not present and his attorney couldn't argue the motion to quash so because of Due process it has all been postponed until January 13th.
I would like to point out a few things because I Know it has been posted here that the CEO Tom Kim believes that Ross is responsible and not him because his contract and that He can sue Ross as an option if and when he loses.
There are some huge problems with that that need to be pointed out to everyone. First in his own words the CEO TOm Kim is a corporate fixer to Billionaires, not millionaires but Billionaires and he posted that on the NGCG website. I t is important to look at what kind of contract this seasoned successful business man signed. Whether or not he had experience in Pubcos' the glaring problems with this contract are basic 101 and it is strange yet apparent that the corporate fixer specialist as he calls himself did no DD before making this deal and used no lawyer to make this contract. I am no genius but wouldn't such a successful seasoned business man have a lawyer to revies a contract.
Please look at the problems of the contract posted below posted by sections:
Section
1- Ross is not the sole shareholder of NGCG and according to this line NGCG is a Delaware corporation doing business as CALVIN ROSS( the corporation)
2-Fails to list the purchase as series A2 shares as required in any contract and states that Ross only sold him 1,000,000 shares but common and not preffered,
4. the closing according to this took place on march 14th. 2016 however it is signed on March 15th 2016 the same day as a different MOU was signed
8. Disputes have to be settled by mediation first and then arbitration and not by filing a lawsuit.
Schedule B: is correct as Kim is not being sued personally and is not responsible for any past debt except the problem is NGCG is being sued and is responsible and no where does this agreement say that the new co NGCG would not be liable for past debts
plus on the MOU it is very clear that there were acknowledge prior debts of notes to Ruppert.
Not to burst your bubble but that outcome isn't even a possibility or an option
The court hearing is only to see if Tom Kim loses the suit tomorrow by default or if the suit will continue
On a normal trajectory
Tom Kim can NOT win the lawsuit tomorrow. He can only lose or stall it out longer
Read the board resolution I posted earlier. It is his common shares not preferred
It wasn't in the Mou. It was in the board resolution Kim made His first day as CEO
lets see if this will clear things up for everyone about the notes end so the wild speculation can end because it is really quite simple
when the suit was filed there were 4 notes. 60k, 8k, 12,493k and a debt purchase from Kalisky for 60K note and then a subsequent affidavit of damages for 163k approx.
The only mistake was a scrivenors error occurred and the wrong Debt purchase amount from Kalisky was used as there was 2 of these done with him but one had been settled already.
Immediately a new affidavit of damages was created for the correct amount of $105k plus fees accrued default interest etc...
When the 60k purchase from Kalisky was filed it also was an error because it really was a 50k face value note with a payback of 60K which is where the 60K amount came from,
The lawyer had been waiting for discovery from the defendant and chose to file the scrivenors error at the same time as our answer to the defendant motion to quash as is his right to do
in such motion you will notice the correct 25k note which was supplanted and filed with the court and the reason for the 60k withdrawal.
I know it seems complicated but really it isn't. The notes actually total are: 60k, 8k, 12,493k and the correct scrivener error note of 25K which equals 105k plus interst and fees isd where the 136k comes from and matches 100% and is consistent. I am sorry it doesn't fit into some posters wild theories but the facts are the facts.
All of these notes have also had proof of payments to the company filed and attached with them as well.
Follow it and it will all make sense. a lawyer does things his way and files what and when he wants and certainly not to satisfy some poster on a message board. When it became apparent that the defendant would not provide any discovery or proof of repayment of any kind or any documentation to back up their assertions then the lawyer filed everything in a timely manner so now anyone who has been posting for the past months that the lawsuit is a scam and someone is trying to collect and sue on already settled debts is FLAT WRONG and now the courts will decide and judge.
I am sure even the most cynical poster can see how easily this mistake occurred especially because the lawsuit was originally filed by the plaintiff Pro se because it was as simple contract dispute case which is easily ruled upon with the proofs.
It has been said for 4 months this is not new. It was a scriveners error and it was the wrong note originally listed. The actual note was 25k. That note had been settled a ways back. Ruppert told everyone this months ago
Because he can issue himself or whoever he wants as much stock as he wants to
How could you say it's clean. All of the share issuances are either incomplete in accurate or just plain missing
No mention of current lawsuit against company it was not done professionally I can assure you
I think your right, we will wait and see, and I also agree that when Ruppert wins they should file for bankruptcy because he would seize the company and shell as an asset but then the problem with that is your suggesting all the shareholder should lose everything because that's what you are saying
that's his wildest fantasy but a great tag line for him to use. as far his claim about ROSS being part of the scam justifying the agreed to venue, Ross had nothing to do with the filings, Charles Morrison signed off on the court Docs with Kalisky or is he accusing Morrison of being involved with Kalisky and Ross on a scam?? very wild and far fetched theories, maybe the court filings should be read and dissected before posting fake facts
again no answer at all. You had clearly stated Choi financed the buying of the SHELL from Ross and clearly you are wrong.
If you can prove with any evidence or emails or anything credible that Ruppert ever asked I'm to do a 3a10 or tried to do one at all with Kim then I will get him to withdraw his suit immediately, absent of any proof it is only your wild fantasy again
haha , maybe you should read the florida statutes and the previously filed lawsuit by Lorne Kalisky against the company where by the company already has previously agreed to jurisdiction on similar notes in Florida nd agreed ina court of law that they do business in Florida, they are a Delaware corporation who distribute products nationwide and also has shareholders and their stock is sold to residents of Forida. That's in addition to the fact that Ruppert is a Florida resident which is enough on its own and that the notes all specifically state Florida is the Venue and proper.
I hope you or they have a better argument than "They are located in California" because they are a nationally publicly traded company
Hysterical. California as a jurisdiction. Every note has florida as venue written on it., all payments were made in Florida and on top of it all there is zero basis for any jurisdiction in California
You are correct this time
You are wrong. His common shares are protected from a reverse in his contract. Not the preferred shares
I am more than happy to post the agreement again later when I can
never met him only spoke to him once
BTW not sure if anyone noticed but in the contract and MOU between ross and Kim if a reverse is ever done than Kim's shares are non reversible. oops not sure if he wanted anyone to know that
WED motion is to hear his motion to quash service, a default has been entered but not a judgement , if NGCG loses their motion a judgment will be enterd
why have shares if you are not going to sell them, isn't that what the stock market is. why would I want to hold them forever and not sell as I ha many shares to sell. Believing in a company is all great and fine but business is business and this was not Microsoft and no pink sheet is ever a long term hold because of investors like these on these boards that try all the time to manipulate stocks with one sided tilted posts.
If the stock was being dumped and it was 237 million shares the stock would of been in trip real quickly. Stock can be sold responsibly without trying to hurt the company.
I am sure that everyone here who has stock would like to sell it if and when it gets to their comfort price and rightfully so
it s been said from day 1 of this lawsuit and feel free to go back and check the postings that no 3a10 is being here and no shares are wanted. If a 3a10 "scam was being done it would of and could of been done long ago as the notes were from a year before Kim ever took over
as far as the 30k note I have posted it and reposted the post # several times so feel free to go back and look again, I owe you no further explanations or proofs as it has been CLEARLY posted and other mindful readers have all seen it.
As far how did she pay for it, honestly that is none of your business or anyones and is not a requirement of collection
Pamela was never in bankruptcy and could do whatever she wanted and quite frankly so could Jason even in bankruptcy which was paid off.
as far as 3 a10 scams you keep alleging that proof has also been clearly posted months ago and again yesterday under the facts vs fiction post so please go look
thank you for posting and being so concerned, I hope I could answer all of your questions
very cute but you forgot to mention that no charges were ever brought and I was fully exhonerated as I was wasn't there and a friend had been borrowing my car. I was in NY at the time like the article says but thank you for posting
it is easy for you to say that because you didn't see the actual business plan, financials and ppts along with Kmart orders and 99 cent stores at the time. you didn't see marketing and advertisement plans and see campaigns produced by high profile real advertisement agencies. They couldn't implement because they didn't have the capital needed and couldn't get real money from the market as a non reporting pink . I will say for all of their flaws, Mike and Phil worked hard and for 12-14 hours a day and put a full effort in. Yes they weren't successful although they di more revenue than is currently being produced
I actually did believe in NGCG and Phil, I liked their complete business plan, obviously that didn't work out and they weren't able to execute, but clearly at least they had a business plan and a business were right now there is no business or even a business plan or even a real direction, the changing direction every week only tells me clearly that they are trying to throw anything up against a wall to see what sticks and the investors will believe in. I can give many reason why I think it is now a POS but I would be writing for a week, I hope I'm wrong so I can collect on my money but I would doubt it from what I know
absolutely not, NO SHARES ARE WANTED IN THIS POS, satisfaction will just be a UCC lein on the company and then collect the judgement in cash either now or later. NO SHARES ARE WANTED
let me clarify because it can it be over either way!!! There is a default judgement already against NGCG. They filed a motion to try and quash service and the default judgement. This hearing is only to determine that motion and here are the possible sceanrios:
If the judge rules for NGCG all it means is the case goes on and that they have to file a formal answer to the court and then a regular summary judgement hearing will take place
or
If the judge rules that NGCG was served properly and just didn't respond because they didn't want to than yes the cas eis over and NGCG loses and has a jusgement against them
next thurs
thank you for the advice for real,I assure you that I am very careful about what I say but the truth is when you are telling the truth and the facts are on your side things are simple and easy. This is really a very simple case about non payment of loans, everything else is just a distraction from certain posters. Lets see what happens next week, besides this is an anonymous board and I can really be anyone posing as anyone or someone else and it is really a guess as to what my identity is or isn't. I can be Tom Kim today if I say that's who I am
and by the way more wrong info, it wasn't a settlement it was a dismissal because Pamela was right, feel free to check these records as well and sorry it doesn't fit your narrative
https://officialrecords.broward.org/oncoreV2/showdetails.aspx?id=59338152&rn=6&pi=0&ref=search
I needed a good laugh thank you. it just is so far off base that it is comical
Creative and funny. A nice combo. Where u came up with a grocery store in funny and creative. Pam had owned and lived in a 1 million dollar house since 2004. Long before ngcg but thanks. The requirement of proving how you made your money that you loaned is creative and hysterical not to mention absurd and ridiculous.
Good think is I don't need anyone to believe me I have Tom Kim's own emails and court docs on my side
NO HE CANT. It hasn't been worth their time to push to get them but trust me it's coming. Kim can not contend fraud and do anything only a judges can name that determination. PERIOD !!!! If cam thought there was fraud he could sue to unwind the contract only. No judge would ever grant him all of the consideration without paying for it. They only one committing any fraud is Kim
Stop listening to the nonsense. Kim can not recind or cancel those shares without a court order. He only had the ability to stop them for 30 days without going to court and trying legally to recover them. Plus they are non reversible if you read on