Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Aegis' website has a long list of recent transactions they were involved in, and it looks like they have been around sine '84. The list is at [url][/url][tag]http://www.aegiscapcorp.com/transactions/recenttransaction/. I looked up two of the deals and how the stock was doing now; one happened to be very successful (TCP Capital Corp) and one not (Mission NewEnergy Limited). They also show MSLP on this page as a corporate advisory client.
Standard disclosure for any company that operates at a loss/has a stockholders deficit. They are required to say all of that for disclosure requirements.
That is not negative cash flow, have to look at the cash flow statement. Operating cash flows were positive for the 9 months. That is really good news.
LOL yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees that IS what its asking. Look at any NT not followed by a restatement, and the answer will be no to that question. Look at an NT followed by a restatement, and the answer will be yes.
A company would not be asked to disclose whether its current period results are going to be significantly different from the prior period before the company is ready to file its financial information.
Yes they have, and you have not supported your interpretation of the statement, which is incorrect.
Could not be more wrong. I'm not saying the current financials will or will not be different from the prior period, but that is definitely not what this question is asking. Look at the last NT 10-Q for MSLP filed on 8/14/12. Those subsequent financials filed on 8/20/12 were significantly different (500% growth period over period), but that question was answered with a "no" in the NT. It is asking about a restatement, period.
(3) Is it anticipated that any significant change in results of operations from the corresponding period for the last fiscal year will be reflected by the earnings statements to be included in the subject report or portion thereof?No
- The question is asking whether the delay is due to a significant change in the prior period financial statements (i.e. the corresponding period for the last fiscal year). In other words, it is asking if the delay is due to a restatement of prior financial information. It is not asking whether the current financial statements will be significantly different.
The dilution is to raise $20M. In order for it to take the whole 100M shares to raise $20M, the post-RS pps would have to plummet 95% to $0.20.
Those who have averaged down. Who would sit on break even at 10 times higher than the current PPS?
Did my own DD with a former colleague who is now in the medical supply industry and I was happy with the response. As a result, while the amount of negativity is causing others to start to doubt, I still firmly believe SGLN is real.
I don't see any facts, just what appears to be opinions. Waiting for a response to how only truths are posted, but no facts supporting the two messages quoted as truths have been presented?
Orders fall through, it happens. Maybe some would consider it bad judgment to PR a deal that wasn't final, doesn't make it a guaranteed scam though.
$0.50 pps or more for $10M in revs?? So $2.65 billion or more market cap? ROTFLMAOAY!!!!! No wonder its impossible to please investors. They apparently want market caps to go from $2M to $2B in less than a year.
Again.There are NO binding legal contracts,only "agreements".
"Agreements" from 10-12months ago,ARE A SCAM!!!
Here is Fong’s secret. His nominees sell their stock in the market to unsuspecting victims. They take part of the money, lets say a third of their “profits” and buy convertible debentures in the company. The rest of their money goes into offshore bank accounts, drugs and fast cars.
How is SGLN a "share selling scam" when the O/S has gone down from 5.9B to 5.3B? Wouldn't "share selling scams" increase the O/S?
How is the O/S GETTING bloated? It has dropped from 5.9B to 5.3B. Is that still a lot? Yes, but at least it is going down not up.
You keep saying there is a lot more coming...where is it?
How is there dilution when the O/S has gone DOWN between filings from 5.9B to 5.3B?
Can you point to where the warning points to Siu or his company?
Is this Asia United International Ltd run by Siu? I mean, if its a fake company scamming people, would they use their own address or use the address of a real business? Maybe the "scam" company is using the address of a legitimate business (Siu's business). Even further, maybe they are using that address because it is the address of a respected company? Just some thoughts.
Looks like shorty already did this DD.
I think you mean he WAS NAMED as a defendant. He is not currently a defendant. On the listing of those involved, it shows Tom as a defendant with a start and end date of the same day. None of the others have an end date. Guessing someone tried to loop him in a claim and it was denied.
Wow, they let that BS list of cases post get stickied?
This statement appears to be false.
It Says that a memorandum of costs after judgment was filed in July 2012 for less than $100. Not a new writ b/c he didn't pay.
These cases are hilarious...
Case Title: INTERVENTIONAL PAIN & ORTHOPEDIC CENTERS INC. VS. THOMAS G. TOLAND
- Amount? Less than $100.
Case Title: REINECKE VS TOLAND
- Best One, not even Tom Toland!! Its between Alfred Toland and Thomas Reinecke.
Case Title: DIRECT MERCHANTS V TOLAND
- Is for credit card interest. Can't find the amount, but a payment was made for $15.
Looked at the amounts of these. Two I have looked at so far are less than $100.
Would help if the post used the same date for the A/S and O/S. The A/S says its from 2010 rather than June 19, 2012 like the O/S.
Selling shares that were already outstanding on the open market is not dilution. And there are many people that can convert debt to shares, not just Fong.
A creditor of $46.5K does not seem like a bunch of money.
Nice mat and rail placement
I would be careful with the statements being made and terminology being used myself. I am no expert, but public accusation of fraud if untrue may not be taken lightly by some parties. just my opinion.
In the video I think the doctor or scientist says mslp is the only company certified by both nsf and informed choice on all its products. Looks like the video was made in September 2011. So with the recent debate on what is and isn't certified, were the products in question introduced after September?
Very funny, especially since they used the same "falling knife" line on this board not long ago.
I thought they already increased the AS to 1,000,000,000
I love the convenient placement of the underlining to make it look like their entire internal control structure is inadequate. Reading further it only relates to timely financial disclosures, who gives a shit.
I'm wondering if the name change is delayed or maybe even not approved because of the trade-for-trade status? Anybody have thoughts on that?
The naked shorting was already confirmed by the indictment of those guys in the case which has caused the stock to be on the dtc trade for trade list. Didn't anybody else read that case?