Maybe. It could also mean they want you to think they have no reason to dilute. From those facts alone, I don't know. I'd have to take a look at all the available information.

I'm just saying that AS can change easily. It's a simple filing. It's quick, easy, costs very little, and no resistance. It's just a "ceiling" like the debt ceiling. It can be moved.

It's just a number I completely toss out in my valuation of companies. But you may be right. I don't know what their intent is. I just know that the AS is not concrete in any sense.

The float is also very high as you describe it. That's more than the total OS of HLIX. But when you are ready, I'd still be very curious to see the profits. If that is the case for "no dilution," I would not be able to say that's off the table. Recurring profits? One time only? I really want to look further.

The AS is meaningless. It can change on a whim with a simple filing at any time.

59M is a huge float. Bad gravity. The physics need to be there first and foremost. I'll have to see it, but so far, you are not making me salivate with anticipation.

We shall see...

Oh, and actually, there is a cancellation factor to everything I said. IFF there is reward money, all bets are off. I see evil and hear evil. Whether that vision is 20/20 or not is solely dependent on the size of the reward money. LOL

Once upon a time, I wanted to be a police officer and ride the guys of One Adam 12. But as I got older, I realized I didn't have the heart for it. Too much grey matter, and very little white/black issues. But money still talks, and grey areas can be bought for the right price! I don't come cheap though, but don't give me any secrets you don't want the FBI to know. Everybody has a price on their head!

That actually makes sense. Don't forget me.

200 million unrestricted sounds scammy. I'll know whether or not it is when I review the facts. I have no problems with scams, however, as long as I'm on the right side of them. Doesn't mean I have to participate in them, but I don't mind profiting from them. People don't believe the truth, no matter what the truth is. The truth is a hard pill to swallow. I'll tell people all the time I'm there to take their money. They give it to me anyway. Full disclosure.

In HLIX's case, I was expecting a scam before I knew it was even HLIX. But it was legit. And still is and always was. That, I'm certain of. The facts if properly weighed yield only one conclusion in that regard. An open and shut case.

Selling cancer sticks with cool cowboy ads? That's high margin, great stuff. Wouldn't smoke it though. What to sell illegal cannabis, the healthier alternative? Sounds good to me. As long as it's illegal in Texas, I'll turn a blind eye. I see no evil; I hear no evil. Or should I say, "evil." When it turns legal in Texas, I still won't smoke it, but you are more than welcome to bring it into my house. Till then, don't bring it in my house. It's nto that I respect the law. Just don't want trouble with the law. Capiche?

And if it's something that really is "evil," which most likely it isn't, I'll still turn a blind eye if the law doesn't offer a way to help that person, as opposed to punishement, where they learn nothing and their problems become worse. With a few exceptions, such as serial killers. Always exceptions to every rule. Like me, the exception to the rule.

My Dilligence Conclusion:

I've been waiting all week for my answer, DD. I've asked twice. You said,

"Would you like to take some of your profits and roll them into another MJ play thats about .02, no dilution, no debt, profitable."

By your silence, I'm leaning heavilty to the conclusion that this was a rhetorical offer. That you can't produce this "profitable" 2-cent company with no dilution and no debt.

I'll give you a boring shampoo that is profitable, no dilution, and pays a 17% dividend. SPCO. More boring than the shampoo they sell! And it's dividend isn't competitive in today's oil trust environment, being that commodities are low.

However, I'm asking a THIRD TIME for this elusive 2-cent stock that's "PROFITABLE" has "no debt" and "no dilution." In the growing MJ industry, no less. What does it have? 1 billion shares to keep such a good thing down?

THIRD TIME is a charm, they say. I'm guessing more silence on par with Alan's research on Zac. In which case, I'l be forced to conclude that you were just blowing more hot air. All talk and and no corroboration. Man, why does it always have to be the ones that talk so much? You talkers give me a bad name. People are going to lump me into the all-talk category.

Another 1000 shares executed.

Wed Jan 25 10:10:57 2017 Buy 1000 TOGL Executed @ $0.69

Up to 7,000 shares, or 7% of the float. That would be more than 1% of the OS. The current OS of this shell, that is.

That ask at .69 was there all day, Shell. And all day yesterday. I couldn't resist it anymore. That's a 30% discount to the CEO's breakeven.

Interesting.

It's not a new issuance. It was a conversion:

Effective December 8, 2015, a change of control occurred with respect to the Company. Pursuant to the transaction, Paragon Capital LP, the former controlling stockholder assigned, transferred and conveyed to the buyers 2,109,286 shares of common stock of Company and convertible notes of the Company totaling $199,500. The convertible notes were convertible into common stock of the Company at $0.01 per share for a total of 19,950,000 shares of common stock. On the closing of the above transaction, Mr. Alan Donenfeld, the then sole officer of Seller, resigned in all officer capacities from the Company and Yik Kei Ong was appointed interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Immediately following the closing of the transaction, the convertible notes ($199,500 in principal amount) were converted into 19,950,000 shares of common stock of the Company. After giving effect to the above described transaction, the controlling shareholders of the Company are Wooi Huat Teow, Chee Chow Teow and Ee Meng Teow.



On March 9, 2016, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Chee Chau Ng to the Company’s Board of Directors. In addition, on that same date, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Ng as its President (Chief Executive Officer), Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer) and Secretary, replacing Mr. Yik Kei Ong who had resigned in all capacities as an officer of the Company on that date. As President of the Company, Mr. Ng will assume the role of Chairman of the Company Board of Directors.



On September 19, 2016, three of our shareholders, owning 15,638,084 shares of common stock, or approximately 70% of the total outstanding shares, approved an amendment to our articles of incorporation to change our corporate name from Prevention Insurance.com to AIM BIG Resources, Ltd. (the “Charter Amendment”). On November 18, 2016, we filed a Definitive Information Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We mailed the Definitive Information Statement to our shareholders on November 21, 2016. The Company expects that the Charter Amendment will be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada in December 2016.


This doesn't raise capital, but it gives these 3 Teow brothers (just a shorthand way of expressing the buyers) all of the company. And that may be the real float as I understand it. They were able to buy at 1 cent, so it's a lot less than I'd be buying. I don't know what their intentions are. They definitely took over and plan to make themselves money. But they can absorb a good reverse split. They may not really care about a reverse split. It would not be good for us though. I just don't know.

These 3 Teow brothers have advanced the company over $100,000 this year just to keep its lights on. I don't think they will be restricted during the real new issuance time. This price is currently a good percentage return for them if they just got it liquid at today's price. I don't know what their goals are. I can see great upside for us where they profit, but I can also see downside for us where they still profit greatly. All of my ventures into shells have been upside for all, or death for all. There are some pathways here that are dark, and I don't know where we are going.

For that reason, I'm going to keep accumulating in our mutual interests. But I want to see how this turns out. I am curious. I don't know where they are going with this. I think it's fully diluted, so that's a good thing.

I'm still not knocking it, Shell. I just see much more potential in our other shells. I have nothing bad to say. I just don't understand it. It may look like I make risky investments, but I really don't. I need to make sure everyone goes down in flames with me if I'm going on a stowaway mission. It's boom or bust for all.

There is no doubt in my mind, however, that you will see an interesting story unfold. They most definitely didn't buy and convert just to stand around and watch paint dry.

1000 Shares Executed

Mon Jan 23 09:38:22 2017 Buy 1000 TOGL Executed @ $0.5

That was me, the only volume so far. 6000 shares total now. 5000 shares remaining on the bid, and then another bid below that a .32.

My competition on the same .50 marker was skipped over and the sale went to me. If only life worked like that all the time. I should always be served first. Always!

If that's new issuance like you say, that changes everything. I'll look deeper tonight if time permits. Now I'm very interested again. Thanks, Shell.

I'm looking at it, Shell. I saw this before and stopped short. I guess my problem is that where I go to first is market cap. I like what you have found and like what I see. However, I have a first-stage filter I have to rule out first and that's where I get hung up.

One, the market cap is $7M before any new issuance. There will have to be a new issuance. The OS is 22M. That's too high to remain. There is going to have to be a massive reverse split first. And that's great for acquisition below a penny. Problem is, the market cap. That's what I can't get past, the capital structure, so I can't get to my second stage of analysis.

If you give me a good reason to get over this hurdle, I can be motivated to look further. This is definitely something I could be interested in, in the future after a reverse soplit and more clarity. I would just need to re-evaluate at that time.

Beyond that, it looks very exciting and interesting from a preliminary skimming. But I've only skimmed, to be fair.

The stock could sore before any reverse split. I'm not saying you won't make money. I'm just saying it's a gamble to me. It's not a sure thing and not my comfort zone. I think our other mutal interests are as sure as you can get, and that's where I like to reside.

Your suggestion, DD:

I'd still like you to direct me to your forum on this one:

"Would you like to take some of your profits and roll them into another MJ play thats about .02, no dilution, no debt, profitable."

I'm genuinely interested. I want to take a look. An honest look. Unlike Alan, I have not made a conclusion first and come with no biases. I want to look at it even if it doesn't report to the SEC. I have the skills for any tools available to me. I'm very adaptable and not regulated. I will be honest in my analysis and will open myself up to correction. I want to be right and paid to be right. That's all I care about. I'm not interested in being not wrong at all. I'd like to make money if you have a good prospect. I care about one thing and thing only: Money. I can't seem to get enough of it.

If it drops to $2.00, that is still a 100% return from last year. That's a fantastic investment.

If I thought the stock was a bargain, I would still be in with all original 10,000 shares. That being said, if I had never sold a share, I'd have paper profits of over $80,000 now (no taxes to be paid). That's a lot more than my real $55K plus gains less taxes. There are a lot of stocks whose value is high and murkey to me that I don't touch. In fact, the only reason I never sell my Wells Fargo is because I have Warren Buffett's endorsement and I have him watching my back 24/7. Otherwise, that would be murkey to me too. But if it's good enough for Berkshire's 2nd largest stock holding (behind Coke), and a bank he said he would put all his eggs into IFFF he were forced to choose just one (said this back in 2008), then that's a strong endorsement for me to swim in murky waters. Without fear at all. I can swim in shark infested murky waters knowing Buffett has my back!

Anything can happen. Cannabase could have 22M in sales by the end of 2017. which would really justify this price because that's a very high margin data driven business. Or maybe it won't. This is called the stock market, Dude Dill. It's where bets are placed, and you get paid to be right.

2016 was an easy call for me. I knew I was right. I never questioned it. These are murky water to me. But if you get down to $2.00 a share, that's still a 100% return. Get down to $1.25 per share, and that's a 25% return in one year from where Alan declined it.

You have new warrants from accredited investors at $1.00 as revealed a few weeks ago. Jennifer at Cannabase makes a million dollars at just $1.00 per share. Doesn't sound like a rip off to me.

I may have missed the boat and the stock runs to $20.00 a share. I'm not placing any bets right now one way or another. But as the stock falls, iff it falls, the case to buy gets stronger and stronger. To you, it will be confirmation not to touch it. But to me, it will continually be a bigger and bigger temptation to touch it. That's why I make money and you just talk about making money.

BTW, in case you weren't looking, HLIX is already reporting to the SEC. There was never talk of an uplisting. HLIX doesn't do much talking. Just a lot of doing. You've already done more talking in one day than HLIX has done all year.

As a company, I don't question any integrity behind the halls of HLIX. As a company, they have a great service. I really love Cannabase and still see it as a potential moat. And that potential gets stronger with each strategic chess move Zac is making on a monthly basis. They have become market leaders overnight. They do what others talk about, and I have great respect for HLIX. This is not a normal penny stock.

Valuation is a mutually exclusive topic. There is a lot of subjectivity to it as well. And startups are just that much more difficult to value. That's a more sophisticated investor, one whose league Alan hasn't reached yet. He's still a newbie.

This was some of the "mud slinging" in Puerto Rico I referred to here in this forum many months ago. A very bullish case, actually. The point being that HLIX had contracts with both industry leaders, and both are fighting over Puerto Rico. Both business enemies, yet both need Cannabase. A strong case for Cannabase and thus HLIX. And now MJ and Biotrack are still aprtners, but HLIX has an investment in Biotrack and Zac is now a board member.

All very bullishi for HLIX. MJ wants the contract of Puerto Rico. Private companies duking it out, and not because they are trying to defraud shareholders.

And, DD, that's very uncouth to call them "lesbo b$#@S." I would be embarrassed to be seen with you in public. First of all, you just insulted the gay community for no reason. Secondly, the potty mouth is very unbecoming. If you are going to insult somebody, attack the argument. You won't win any political points attacking any readers you are offending in the process.

Alan's source is here, which I read long ago:

http://mjbizdaily.com/puerto-rico-inventory-tracking-system-deal-embroiled-dispute/

I'm glad he is finally getting around to some DD. Now, can you rsearch Zac, Alan, for the umpteenth time...

Personally, I'm a big fan of Lucky Luciano, so none of this bothers me. Benjamin Malone, not so much. Meyer Lansky's brain, I put that on a pedestal. Good guys gone bad. I blame it on prohibition. Bad laws. Conservatives. That's the problem! LOL I can't think of any hit job by by the New York mob that wasn't justified. Now, Chicago, that's a nother story.

I already took kmy profits, DD. But let's hear it. I'm always open minded. What did you have in mind?

Volume

I don't trade. I invest. When this stock was a .02 last year, I was in it and talking to the sound of crickets. Let's review a post, one year ago, shall we:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119294064

That's post 5023, written December 15, 2015. I'm talking to "Mariguanastock89," one of the very few visitors. He was just looking for news and was dismayed at the lack kof volume. And left. Another professional MJ investors I have to "compete" with these days.

I said, "So BLPG is currently valued at $4M whereas HLIX has a market cap of $2M. I'm not a perfect market theorist, for the record. Behavioral Finance is the real deal. Perfect markets exist only in the long term scheme of things."

A few months later, I got bored of talking to crickets, so I took my case to Alan. And, well here we are today. Still talking about "low volume" and press releases.

For another BLPG comparison, a year later, they are still at 4 cents. Haven't moved at all, but they sure do have good volume. I think if you divide that volume by 1000, which would be like a reverse split for them to get them up to where we are today, the volume would be equal.

Just saying...

Well, that's progression.

We have gone from the purchase itself and press release is a scam to it was a real press release after all. But bad decision making from the MJ industry leaders.

That's a big step in the right direction. Reminds me of the new Trump administration. Gone from global warming is a hoax made up by the Chinese to it's most likely real, influenced by man, but that the Democrats were bad policy makers.

Big steps! Reminds me of myself, 30 years ago. Not the same person. Keep thinking. You are moving in the right direction.

That's not relevant to valuation. You don't know what the terms of the deal were. You don't know what, if any, exit price anyone has in mind. At no time has Zac ever talked about the price of the stock after it passed $2.00 per share. He only talks about revenue and sales goals.

Shorts are welcome to step up and increase volume. They will be met with buyers at prices that make sense to buyers. As I said long ago, it's expensive to me. But I don't predict the future. I have 70 shares on the table at this time. And I value that $560 as much as I valued over 50 grand, my profit here. I fully intend to increase my position and I'll be sure to time-stamp it for you when I do. Right now, I have taxes galore to pay, and not just from HLIX.

If the stock goes down, you have not made a case for a scam. Correlation is not causation. Obesity rates have gone up at about the same time telephone poles went up, and both have increased accordingly. The two are unrelated.

Your scam hypothesis has been set up as a false, invalid experiment. Right now, shorts aren't choosing to increase the volume on HLIX. You, yourself, are more than welcome to go short a million shares on this stock. I'm sure you will find buyers all the way down to $1.00. In fact, you would be doing me a favor. And then you can cover to me. Valuation is a mutually exclusive topic.

Remember, according to Jennifer of Cannabase, it was Jennifer that approached Zac. Not the other way around. It's your position that she walked into Zac's office and he said to himself,"Oh, there's somebody I can scam. I'm glad I didn't have to come to her to scam her, but she came to me so I can scam her."

When sentiment is in the toilet, like it was at .80 when I presented this wonderful investment opportunithy to Alan, I'm interested. I love angry shareholders. Like at BBRY, I'm loving the negative sentiment there. At HLIX, we have high sentiment. Not my comfort zone. But that has nothing to do with Zac's integrity. I do not question anyone's integrity here.

You are trying to make the case that good business decision makers (because these are the mose succesfful in the MJ industry) are making bad decisions when it comes to making deals with HLIX> And you have no idea what the deal was. Illogical and completely unrelated to HLIX stock price.

That's a new angle:

"HLIX is not scamming shareholders, yet they are scamming the best privately held mj companies."

And this is the position that got Alan's endorsement. I'm speechless.

So, the best privately held MJ companies, not the poorly-performing MJ companies. Wouldn't it be prudent to assume that the best managed companies are the smarter companies? Hence, the reason they are doing the "best"?

So, put another way, Zac is scamming the smartest people in the industry. But not the shareholders. Not just BioTrack, but MJ too. Run by women. They say women are smarter than men, even. I believe it. They can't run faster, but they can think faster. Well, some of them can run faster than me, but not on a percentage basis.

So the smartest and brightest of the field are getting scammed. These are the ones, presumably, than Alan would be endorsing for his clients -- the best in the MJ industry. We'll go on to assume that they are so smart they didn't bother to have a professional money manager vet this major life-changing decision. Their whole future is getting scammed by Zac. Zac, of course, who started this company with some of the best minds and reputations in law enforcement.

HLIX is all about compliance. That must be like hiding in plain sight then. Wow. Okay. Because we are going to judge a stock on its volume, like those toxicly financed companies -- lots of volume on those. Whew! Well, I gotta go to work.

I'm speechless. I guess this is why I'm doing so well in the market. I don't have much competition in the way of investors. It's not that I'm competing with the brightest minds. So I'm offended, yet not. I wouldn't want it any other way.

Very interesting interview. I plugged my Apple Iphone 7 into my car stereo and listened to it as I drove from work to the park. Technology is amazing for those of us who remember the '80s. Man, that wasn't too long ago and we have come so far. Where was Zac in 1985 and where was I, and who would have guessed I'd be listening to him in my Beetle in the year 2017. Which makes me wonder who is doing what now when I'll be plugging their memory chip into my head in 2040.

I really enjoyed that interview. Usually it's I-heart Radio, but yesterday it was the HLIX show. So, once again, the mythical yet real acquisition of BioTrack was touched upon. Claimed as fact and talked as matter of factly. No talk of a possibility that it was just a fake press release, which didn't surprise me at all.

Some facts gleaned: BioTrack's revenue is in the 7 digits and they are significantly larger than HLIX in terms of revenue. I knew this already from my research on the two market leaders, BioTrack and MJ. But there it is in audio which is as good as stated on the record in writing. Not only that, but Zac plans to make more strategic acquisitions going forward. High finance, big plans, and a growing industry.

There was talk of California and some other things. New product lines coming. I need to listen to that again. These other drivers were distracting me. Listening to music and listening to interviews while driving just isn't the same as far as absorption of the details go. Yes, I will listen to that again on the way to work, which is where I'm going right now.

"Thank you, your order has been placed"

Coming from Amazon, as I said not long ago:

https://www.amazon.com/Tao-Charlie-Munger-Compilation-Commentary/dp/150115334X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1484604277&sr=8-1&keywords=tao+of+charlie+munger

Alan, this deal was not done in cash. Not sure why you think it had to be done in cash. Pretty much anything done in cash is inefficient. Zac comes from high finance. This was surely done in a majority stock swap type of deal. I just know this from simple extrapolation. I have no doubt the next report in April will prove this hypothesis correct. Press releases are there for material change, and this was a material change. No reason not to believe it.

When you finish your research on Zac, you'll note that he has roots at JP Morgan, where he starts a long career in high finance. This involves, amongst other things, making accretive deals. One way to do that is with equity. Shareholders in Biotrack can be liquid this way, and shareholders in HLIX can have a strategic partnership and value created at the same. It's like 3 birds, one stone. You either knew this already and are playing games, or you didn't know this was possible. I'm thinking the former, hoping not the latter.

HLIX in Expansion Mode

https://audioboom.com/posts/5488847-zachary-venegas-ceo-of-helix-tcs-discusses-california-s-new-legal-cannabis-market-outlook

There is a new interview with Zac. I haven't even listened to it yet myself. I plan to later tonight, so it's a mystery to what I'm presenting.

New filings with the SEC last week show faith in the company's management. The stock has been very stable for several months in its ongoing price discovery, despite the vacuous claims of Alan back when the stock was $1.00.

BTW, Alan, have you finished the research on Zac yet? Is it still on the top of your to-do list, which you promised us a few months ago? I hope the those things on the bottom of your to-do list are proceeding in a more expedient manner. Please don't forgot to post your findings here, even if they don't jive with your conclusion-first approach.

My Insurance Policy?

I like this alignment of interests:

Source: http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=11505537


A change of control of the Registrant occurred on June 13, 2016. On that date, Michael Toh Kok Soon (the "Purchaser"), purchased a total of 277,383 shares of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Registrant (the "Shares"). The Shares were purchased pursuant to the terms of an Agreement for the Purchase of Common Stock dated May 31, 2016, by and between the Purchaser and A. Terry Ray (the "Seller''). The Shares represent approximately 70.55% of the Registrant's issued and outstanding common stock, and as a result, the transaction resulted in a change of control of the Registrant.

As part of the change of control transaction, the holders of 3 convertible promissory notes of the Registrant (the "Notes"), in the aggregate principal amount of $533,925.98, assigned their interest in the notes to the Purchaser. At the option of the holder, the Notes are convertible into shares of common stock of the Registrant at a price of $1 .00 per share.

The amount of consideration for the purchase of the Shares and Notes was U.S. $230,000.00, which was paid in full at closing. The Purchaser used its own capital for acquisition of the Shares.


What I see in this? An insurance policy. There are only 100,000 shares (rounding off) of a true float. Our CEO owna the rest. These may be freely tradeable shares for him. I'm not sure on how the law works in this unique case. But there has been no volume for him to exit. His entire cost is breakeven at $1.00. So, all my purchases are secured by his interests. If he loses, I lose. I'm okay with that. As an investor, I want him to wake up every day to figure out how to make me a 500% return or more. And the only reason for him to do this, and not just invest his money the lazy way like me, is for just that -- a 500% return or more.

The physics here *at this time* are remarkable.

So Michael also bought those convertible notes. According to my understanding, he must convert next month. This was all the debt the company had, so he could just erase it. Or will he convert? Regardless of what he does, it's an alignment of interests.

Terms of notes and source: http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=11429766

"On January 7, 2015, the outstanding notes payables of $523,916 were replaced by convertible notes payables in the same amounts. In addition, accrued interest of $74,491 associated with the outstanding notes payable was forgone and forgiven by the note holders. The notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $1.00 per share at the note holders’ sole and exclusive option. The convertible notes were originally interest free until December 31, 2015, and due on February 1, 2016. In January 2016, due dates for the convertible notes were extended to February 1, 2017. In addition, the convertible notes were amended to remain interest free until December 31, 2016, after which time the notes shall bear interest at 6% per annum."



Will they be extended further, resulting in a 6% yield for him going forward? Or will he exercise? Or will he forgive them for a pristine balance sheet? To me, it doesn't matter. All options are good for him, and all options are in alignment with my interests. He can't recover his investment in any situation without creating a 500% return on this stock, making it very liquid, and keeping downward pressure away until I'm free. I'm the small stowaway that's free, unrestricted, not regulated, and ultimately the most powerful here in terms of market dynamics.

Everything else in this story going forward will just be icing on the cake. It will be a novel. I do not expect anything until the year 2018. Until then, it will be accumulation time.

Voluntary Disclosure: That was me yesterday, buying another 2,000 shares at an offer of .98. Total freely tradeable share count in my posession as of 1/14/17 -- 5,000 unrestricted shares. That's over 1% of the outstanding shares *at this time* and 5% of what I would define as the true float on this company. And the true float for all of 2017 -- Physics magnificientia!

There has been an ongoing few rounds of seed capital, one happening next month. But available only to their "agents" who are also mandatorily invested with an alignement of interests in this case. But by law, their hands will be tied (restricted). And they are private placesments at this time, and that is good in my eyes. They are getting discounted prices from 10 cents to 30 cents per share as I understand it.

I wish I knew where these "Toga Games" are at. Or is that just a plan for the future? I'd like to play them and check them out.

I know I'll never use Toga Options. One, I'm not interested in "binary trading." I take long positions and speed has no meaning to me. I love Etrade. I'm not leaving Etrade. Been with Etrade since the '90s and I even own Etrade stock. But Toga Options is nice for some, I'm sure. Etrade Pro is fantastic and like being in the cockpit of a 747. But all I need is a bid and ask. That's all I need. I don't even remember how to log into Etrade Pro. It's on my desktop, but I never click it. It is awesome though. I do know that much.

But the games! I want to play and try out some of these games. While I'm waiting for the company to raise some capital, issue shares, and so on, I could be playing games in the meantime. Like when I go to the Dentist, I can read a magazine as I wait to be seen.

Shell, write me at nobadorders5@yahoo.com. I have something to show you. Very interesting...

Put Shell King in the title.

Thinking out loud:

I'm smooth sailing at work and multi-tasking. I don't have a deep micro understanding of market maker dynamics, Shell. But from what I understand, when we get a double count like yesterday, it means the market maker has no inventory.

It's hard to see unless we are so think as we are here. There was no spread on that volume. Just my price. IFF they didn't have inventory, then they had to buy their shares to sell me the shares. And that's how you get a double count. Am I wrong?

None of this matters. Just thinking out loud and curious.

Like today, I just got another 1000 shares on TOGL. My order is the only one and that was actually counted once. So it came from inventory of whatever market maker did the transaction.

There is no short interest on AVNI. But what IFF enough short interest shows up next month to match my order? That would be interesting. And if I don't see any short interest, buy their shares? I don't know. All interesting.

The only relevance to any of this is that dilution could be ruled out by a double tick in counts as I undertand it. Dilution was ruled out anyway at this stage of the game. But interesting observation. And that's the "crime" V is usually accused of. But they represent clients. They are only messengers in any event doing legal activity. Dilution in and of itself nothing shady. Just not good for shareholders. Hence, alignment of interests is always a good thing, which we have here.

Back to work....

1000 Shares

That was me. Just now took us down to .75. 1000 on the ask. I'll take it. Back to $1.00 on ask. No thank you.

3000 shares total now -- in my possession.

Lovin It! 10,000 would be nice. I'm still on the bid.

VNDM

A tried to do a little quick research on VNDM. From a reputable source, I got this:

"Vandham Securities was founded in 1990. This market makers specializes in small cap and illiquid securities as well as makes markets in all major exchanges and U.S. options markets."

That certainly fits the profile of AVNI.
------------------------------------------------------------------

It's hard to find legit info on them. Here is a good description corroborating the above quote:

http://www.financialbrowsers.com/articles/Stock-Brokers_13707.html

Vandham Securities Corp is a member of NASD, the National Association of Securities Dealers. NASD is a self-regulatory organization of the securities industry responsible for the operation and regulation of the NASDQ stock market and over the counter markets. It also administrates exams for the investments professionals, such as the series of 7 exams.

The Company was founded in 1990; and was faced with the enormous task of distinguishing itself among the many thousands of broker or dealers claiming to provide exceptional service to the institutional investment community. Not unlike others before them, they had a vision of a service-oriented broker or dealer, able to deliver highly personalized service in a reliable and professional manner. Their goal was to apply their 'hands on' management style to create a unique blend of seasoned investment professionals and 'hi-tech' oriented industry newcomers. Such a merger was necessary if they were to properly service their existing client relationships and build new ones.

At inception, Vandham was primarily engaged in institutional sales, trading and market making. Since then, they have greatly expanded in each of these areas as well as added a significant soft-dollar sales department providing third party research and enhanced their trading technology.

Their team of experienced professionals is extremely sensitive to the needs of their clients. They are proud to service their customers with a combination of the old and the new. They use their collective knowledge of the markets to execute trades in line with their customers' requirements. They take into account the many different parameters of a trade -speed, market impact, liquidity, volatility and market movements to name but a few -and they determine the best venues for bringing the order to the market.Vandham simplifies soft dollar and directed brokerage arrangements.

Vandham remains one of the best kept secrets in an industry where clients often require anonymity. Vigilant attention to client needs involves many aspects of the client-broker relationship. A vast network of executing brokers helps to complete the ingredients needed for a quality trade execution. In short, no customer or order is the same and every customer and order is valuable.


At otcmarkets, they are listed with several pages of secrutities they represent. AVNI is on the list, and it's one of several.

In the investment chat community, they have a bad reputation for manipulation and "dilution." But I discount all of that as hearsay. I can't find a legitimate source. I'm not falsifying their claims, just discounting them. Unless it's a credible source with good supporting evidence, I wont' consider it. The human race is notorious for seeing patterns that are completely random. Behavior in casinos can verify this. So, I need peer review and I can't find anything at this time.

They have no website that I can find and don't make a case for themselves anywhere. Although, my research was really fast, skimming, and limited in its scope.

My ruling: Innocense. Just a market maker on AVNI. Whatever their motives are, they gave me some cheaper shares, which is what I wanted.

I wish. I'm flying solo this week. My pilot is on vacation, and my air traffic controller called in sick today. It's just me, the co-pilot, flying solo, and I have to land this tomorrow. And it's going to be a rough landing if ground control doesn't get back online soon. I have some blind spots.

Everybody is having fun but me this week.

Passengers are clueless! The President says I need to get traffic control training ASAP. No arguments there.

Luckily for me, no turbulence and clear skies ahead. But I MIGHT have to make a controlled crash landing tomorrow. No autopilot in this cockpit. Good thing I have a good runway tomorrow. This is the best possible to time to lose my crew.

CAIE is only a guess. No ticker change yet. I'm just guessing that that will be the new ticker eventually. It's her 4-letter name, and the company - "Caie Foods." Just a fun prediction is all.

Tell me if you see anything interesting on Lvl 2. I'm never home during trading hours, and I don't have time to analyze it that much. I'm happy to see all this activity this week, even though I was a significant part of it. The bid is jumping around. Any activity is good activity.

I'm predicting a ticker symbol change to CAIE, Shell. It's available and the most logical choice in my eyes.

What do you think it will be? Any guesses?

I'm very doubtful we'll see another r/s, and that's a good thing. It would surprise me. I'm hoping for a 10-million share issuance. Everybody wants to do 20 to 30 million. I don't get that. Why not go low to swing high?

I don't know if they have the experience to have an IR firm to get exposure. Whatever happens, happens. Their fate is my fate. Maybe Rhudi Campbell (sp) can steer them on the right course, a little push out to sea.

Oh, you are using Lvl 2. You are talking about a cosmetic market maker. I have no idea. I have Etrade Pro at home. I'm just looking at the basics from work. I never use LVL 2 anyway.

The alignment of interests are all that matter. That other stuff is superstition. As long as two former board members got paid at a price of .50 per share, we are on the same page. No capital was raised, no issuance. Nothing to dilute at this point anyway. That's all baggage from the past, years ago, before Spicy Pickle's board members ever got involved in this shell. And those guys are long gone too. I don't even have TOS to follow. And if I did, I'd shred it.

This one is dead. Dead, dead, very dead. And to me, that is very good! Very bullish. What we will get are restricted shares coming in, in the not so distant future. We are stowaways, the only ones with a free pass to do anything we want whenever we want. No supervision, no restrictions, no rgulations. We are the powerful here, Shell. Everybody else will have their hands tied with an alignmen tof interests, and that's a good thing.

The MM you are seeing could explain why 4,000 shares traded when I only bought 2,000 in premarket. They are able to manipulate and sell on the ask somehow. They have shares somehow, but it's not dilution. I don't know the micro mechanics behind it. All I'm interested in is the market cap, the story behind it a this point. And one thing for certain: Caie is real, and her husband is real. And their restaurant is going on year 11 in business, the commissary even longer than that. No growth in the store unit (a big singular) but there has been real expansion of the product. Not a big player, but it's legitimate and that's all that matters rigiht now.

I know they have a bad reputation for manipulation, but that's manipulation, if any, is aligned with our interests at this point. I don't even know if they would remain when everything comes out of the wash. This is all a legal entanglement at this time.

What does "VNDM showed up on the ask" mean? My ticker symbol is AVNI.

2,000 more shares purchased.

I have a total of 12,000 shares now, Shell King. This is getting exciting. Someone bailed yesterday, and I picked up 2,000 in pre-market just now at 51 cents. A 1 cent premium over the two recent issues for insiders. Blackmail in my eyes, but that's okay. That's how it goes. Quid pro quo and alignment of interess with that quid pro quo.

This one is further along than any shell out there that I know of. I think this company will start off with a minimum of 2M in sales. Rock bottom. I don't have any other metrics, but with a hypothetical 12M share issue, that's a p/s of 3 at this price. That's good. I love the tenure the company has had and the true passion behind it. I think it's going to be a push for grocery scalability.

I love mystery gifts. The only thing I'm most interested in right now is who will be on the BOD. Will it be more than 2 people? I'm ready for this book to start being written!

If only I could pick up some TOGL like this. That one is a pure psychology and coming pump/pyramid scheme. They just have a low OS and good music with their marketing.

Then there is that Bryan Glass shell. I'm now at 800,000 shares. Only 200,000 shares from goal. Many days, nobody will bite. Some days, maybe only 25 shares will be given to me. Best day, 100,000 Over 4 months now trying to get .0015 there. Slowly but surely....

And lastly, the foreign stock shell that has filings galore on SEDAR. Big things good. Astronomical share count, but alignment of interests with private placements. Trades zero. I want a million share there too.

As for AVNI, 12,000 shares is plenty. That's some good leverage. If it drops further, I'll buy more. I have such a good strong cash cushion that I can still dive deep into. Strong, strong stability in all stocks. Only Wells has been taking off like a strong horse as of late, and everybody else is holding the line, strong as rocks. But that's good. Wells is my front man. My Jupiter. He runs block and is extremely powerful leverage with stable dividends. Just need one little sucker to break through. It's going to be good! I feel it!

So much fun!

CAN'T WAIT TO SEE the update on AVNI, coming soon I think. Next month? This one is real. TOGL, I don't know what that is but it's interesting. AVNI, boring but real. And real is good.

2,000 more shares purchased.

I have a total of 12,000 shares now, Shell King. This is getting exciting. Someone bailed yesterday, and I picked up 2,000 in pre-market just now at 51 cents. A 1 cent premium over the two recent issues for insiders. Blackmail in my eyes, but that's okay. That's how it goes. Quid pro quo and alignment of interess with that quid pro quo.

This one is further along than any shell out there that I know of. I think this company will start off with a minimum of 2M in sales. Rock bottom. I don't have any other metricks, but with a 10M share issue, that's a p/s of 3 at this price. That's good. I love tenure the company has had and the true passion behind it.

I love mystery gifts. The only thing I'm most interested in right now is who will be on the BOD.

If only I could pick up some TOGL like this. That one is a pure psychology and coming pump/pyramid scheme. They just have a low OS and good music with their marketing.

Then there is that Bryan Glass shell. I'm not at 800,000 shares. Only 200,000 shares from goal. Over 4 months now trying to get .0015 there. Slowly but surely....

And lastly, the foreign stock shell that has filings galore on SEDAR. Big things good. Astronomical share count, but alignment of interests with private placements. Trades zero. I want a million share there too.

As for AVNI, 12,000 shares is plenty. That's some good leverage. If it drops further, I'll buy more. I have such a good strong cash cushion that I can still dive deep into. Strong, strong stability in all stocks. On Wells has been taking off, but everybody else is holding the line, strong as rocks. Just need one little sucker to break through. It's going to be good! I feel it!

CAN'T WAIT TO SEE the update on AVNI, coming soon I think. Next month? This one is real. TOGL, I don't know what that is but it's interesting. AVNI, boring but real. And real is good.

$2M Share Offering:

Very interesting:

https://togachatworld.com/about/

99% certainty just went to 100% certainty as they verify TOGL is their ticker symbol. They are offering their "agents" participation in a 2M share offering, coming within a few months IFF it proceeds on schedule. That's the pyramid-feeling I keep getting and touched upon earlier. Like an Amway or that Pink Cadillac makeup company -- what was that one again? -- but a whole lot more interesting.

If you are a TOGA Agent you can trade your shares inside the Internal Exchange. You may transfer fund into your Exchange virtual office in anticipation for the next offering of Toga’s 2 million shares on or before February 2017. Toga Ltd. is a publicly listed company under OTC (Over The Counter) with TOGL as Stock Symbol. The price offering last October 28, 2016 was at $.30 per share. Toga agents acquired it at a special discount at $.10 per share for a minimum of 1,000 shares. Company’s projection in 3-5 years is 8,333.33% increase.

Current Value is now $.80


These will by law of the 1933 act have to be locked up for one year minimum. So the float is what our OS is at this time, rounding off to about 400,000 shares, which is pretty awesome. 2M new issuance isn't that much, plus whatever the prior offering was. When all the dust clears, we could be an overall low market cap for an OTC company. We shall see... Since our CEO, Michael Soon, owns 80% (or was it 70%?) of this tiny float, the real float is miniscule. So miniscule. Rounding out, make that real float a cool memorable 100,000 shares. And that is excellent physics.

Interesting Price Target Set by Toga:

This is an interesting commentary made by Toga. They set a price of $5.00 for their stock, yet they don't list the ticker symbol. They say their stock is trading at 30 cents when this was written on November 30th. This ticker was indeed at 30 cents on that day. Yet, it's still technically an empty shell at this time. There hasn't even been a new issuance yet.

Very interesting that they would say the following, yet it does give a glimpse into their psyche on this stock. They can hardly sit still in their seat. Like a kid in the backseat, saying "are we there yet? Are we there yet?" This author doesn't know how slow lawyers move. No sense of urgency in the courts. But attorneys love to push things out to the last minute. Especially payment, if possible. Then they love to scramble and want rush jobs at the very last minute. Sometimes I wonder hwo they made it through school with such procrastination and disorganization.



TOGACHAT is the latest Social Messaging App (mobile apps) under the umbrella of TOGA CAPITAL GROUP. It is a multi functional app positioned in the market to exceed the features of Skype, Viber, WhatsApp, WeChat, Line, Kakao Talk, IMO, Black Berry Chat, etc.
TOGA CAPITAL is an OTC Market (USA) listed Conglomerate with a current stock share value of $0.30 per share. As the number of the TOGACHAT app user grows exponentially, Toga Capital stock shares value is expected to skyrocket up to $5.00 per share in the next 2-3 years wherein it will signal for the Group transfer to NASDAQ.
TOGA CAPITAL has a amazing opportunity create wealth and financial freedom in a shorter period of time compare to similar programs.




Source: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?id=222051388229101&story_fbid=225303177903922

Posted November 30, 2016, at 5:30 p.m.

I get the feeling that message wasn't authorized by his/her superiors. But that's fine by me. That is not something that came out of his/her brain without input from his/her superiors.

Toga Chat is free. I stand corrected. I like free. My most used app is free, "My FitnessPal." I still don't pay for the extra features because I don't find them to be useful. But I'm part of their ad revenue justification. And I'm fine with receiving ads. I like to be informed. It's kinda rude for people to say they don't want to watch ads, yet don't want to pay for feature either. Could you be anymore of a leech on society?

Best description I've seen yet. Short and simple. 30-minute videos out there, and nothing says it better than this:

Toga Chat is a messaging app with a focus on entertainment and security. It’s fast, simple, secure and free.
Toga Chat seamlessly syncs your normal messages and secret messages into one application. You can send an unlimited amount of messages, photos, and voice messages. Toga Chat groups allow you to send broadcasts to up to 100 contacts at a time. Be sure to check our core secret message feature to send a private message to your contacts without any data stored in your phone after ending conversation.


Good ratings from 66 feedbacks:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.toga.chat&hl=en

And of course, there is the "TogaGo" and "Toga Options" and whatever other future Toga ideas come along. Quite interesting. This has potential to be a good adventure.

Scales tip back in wrong direction.

My latest thoughts are not being confirmed by further reading into these filings. They are still talking about a business plan involving art, which is illogical. They should not be talking about any business plans. Online art? Could you be any more boring?

And why the name change to Kingsmen then? I think I will wait for more clarity. I'm starting to get mad reading all these contradictions. Nothing is consistent and nothing can be pinned down. Very, very annoying.

I'll stick to the 4 experiments and keep this in my peripheral vision. Those jerks. Wasting my time...

My Latest Thoughts:

What IFFF this is the company I discounted, Shell:

https://kingsmen-capital.com/about-us/

It's the only thing with the name Kingsmen out there. At first I discounted it. I still do, but I don't rule it out. What if Bayswater is like Empire Financial. I know you heard of Bryan Glass.

I have about 600,000 shares (goal of 1 M) in one of Bryan's shell companies. Been buying it at a fraction of a penny over the last few months. At first, I thought an Indy movie company was going to come through it since Bryan Glass is heavily involved in that. Then I saw speculation elsewhere similar to my speculation. Then I learned he has at least 5 of these shells that he is filing active things with, with the NVSOS. But he is a broker and taking companies public as a middleman. More complicated. He buys them and then sells them. Kinda like what we are doing but on a much more sophisticated level. I'm used to seeing a company cmoe in and buy a shell with legal counsel. But he is like a middleman in the process. So, what I thought would be an Indy film company is just going to be a mystery gift. Down the line. Who knows when. Or when I'll ever reach my one-million-share goal.

So what IFF Bayswater is like Empire Financial. That they become the owners and then bring in a new owner. They assistant in mergers, so that is like Empire Finanicla. MAYBE they are doing the same as broker Bryan Glass -- the middle man -- BUYING AND SELLING the shells. So this name change would be a lot further along than some of Bryan's stuff. So, Bayswater could have this Singapore address but trying to pull somebody else in from a different address. That could be, right?

I can't rule it out. I have no evidence. I have a potential suspect. I like it IFFF thath Kingsmen above came through from these murky waters below us. I don't what is coming up from the depths here, but I'm curious. Every shell seems to be taking a different path to legitimacy. At one time, I was under the impression that there was only one legal path in these reverse mergers. I haven't seen the same path taken by anyone yet. They are all getting to the same place through so different r/m paths. Debts are never handled the same way. Fascinating!

I read that bio on him somewhere also. Seems like an unrelated industry which I didn't like.

The address is not a low-rent address. It's in a very nice building. High-rent building in a good area. It looks like a building that should be in a James Bond Movie. Lots of interesting tenants. If they can keep the light bulbs on there, that's just enough to tip the scale to my interest in a little adventure. I'll see what's available for me on Tuesday.

Maybe that 02/03 is two different suites sharing a common address. I would need to look in person to understand I guess. I remember a Fed Ex situation recently that wouldn't deliver and made sense to nobody until wwe drove down to this place in person and then the lightbulb went off. Fed Ex couldn't figure out why their own company was returning the package. The recipient kept saying the address was right. Maybe this is one of those weird situations.

That's interesting, Shell. Thanks. That's very interesting. Baswater also shares that same address. And that one looks impressive. I like banking.

The "consulting" would be consistent with the vague description of the "Kingsmen" description." It's all confusing, but I'm interested again. I might make this Experiment #5. A wild card. Why not? It will be another stowaway adventure. Something is cooking. I like mystery gifts.