Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Very good..Thanks for sharing
Glenn Beck for financial advice? This thread is taking a curious direction.
TT
Bruce:
Reasons to consume less fossil fuels don't only relate to global warming. Do you think dismissing the global warming issue and the effect on environment as "wise". I've been so pro-development and made so much money building and expanding on my small part of the world I'm beginning to question my small footprint in the context of multiplication. I don't pooh-pooh other opinions so quickly now that I have aged.
TT
Bruce:
The article says 85% of Americans are satisfied with their health care. That is simply not true.
As a small business owner I am happy to pitch in and contribute to make sure all my employees have health insurance under the new government plan. I'm a lifelong Republican (but did vote for LBJ ) and feel embarrassed that not one of my Senators here in Texas can think for the common man. Sen Hutchinson being the worst. I just wish it didn't look like us Republicans were so greedy in this time of great national need.
Hi Bruce:
Sold my BAC today at $6.82. First time I've made money on a trade in 2 years. Switched brokers and have someone now who isn't so optimistic, more of a pragmatist.
Might make up a few bucks.
Have another buy order in for BAC at $6.13
Good luck,
TT
Bruce:
Coming back from being battered and bruised by NFI. Picked up 5000 shares of BAC a few days ago at $5.65. It's $7.12 after hours. Think BAC is just a trade or is there hope.
God Bless,
TT
Hello Zeev:
Been following your SNDK discussion. How much lower could it go?
NFI near $0. You said once that M-Reits were hard to understand. Seeing what has happened to the mortgage industry seems like no one and his brother understood.
Seen you've been ill. Hope you are on the mend.
God Bless,
TT
Hi choad:
Since you and I, have had a dialogue in the past, I'd like you to know that my biggest stock holding NFI has taken a turn for the worst and I am now at or below break-even on what I have held the last 3 years.
I've learned "again" that there is no easy money. Many have been ruined by what seems to be unscrupulous management at NFI.
Wealth is fleeting...God is always..
God Bless,
TT
Dr. Worm:
I missed the point of your reply?
God Bless,
TT
Bruce: NFI
Cost Basis on 5k shares $10.56
Today bot 30 Jan 08 $20 calls @ $4.90 (I've never bought calls broker advise)
Sold 50 NFI Jan 08 $30 puts @ $11.90
God Bless,
TT
Bruce:
Those Jan 08 $30 puts are around $10.00 the dividend is $5.60 for a total return of $15.60 in 14 months.The stock is around $30
50% return in 14 months seems well worth the reward/risk formula, especially considering all of 2007's dividends are in the bank.
With that kind of return why waste time trading?
To each his own, really.
God Bless,
TT
Hello Bruce:
NFI continues to perform. I have done quite well on this stock and found a message board dedicated to the subject. http://208.101.19.14/smbd.asp?mb=4148&pt=m I have consistently sold puts on this stock the last two years, doubling the dividend of $5.60 per share. NFI has nearly banked all of 2007's dividend paid for by 2006 earnings alone. Very different company.
No one here is interested in dividend paying stocks that carry high option premiums.
God Bless,
TT
Mutual Fund Director
From TheStreet.com - The Last Honest Man?
Investing
Why Does Failure to Deliver Go Unpunished?
By Arne Alsin
RealMoney.com Contributor
There is a systemic problem in the equity market, but the magnitude of the problem is impossible to gauge because the parties involved refuse to answer a simple question: Why?
My mutual fund purchased five blocks of stock in Overstock (OSTK:Nasdaq) during the first quarter. There was a failure to deliver shares in four out of the five purchases, with delays for delivery lasting as long as three weeks. Nobody can tell me why shares were not delivered within the requisite three-day settlement period -- the so-called T+3 requirement.
This is not a single isolated occurrence, or a one-in-a-million bookkeeping bump in the road. The Securities and Exchange Commission recently acknowledged that $6 billion in stock have failed deliveries each day. Out of 6,000 publicly traded stocks, over 300 are currently experiencing significant delivery problems.
There are two common ingredients to every financial scandal that has rocked Wall Street over the years.
The first is that the perpetrators have power or influence that the average investor does not have. While small investors have to play by the rules, market players with power or influence work around the rules or simply break them.
For some sellers of stock, it appears that property can be delivered at a time of their choosing. It's not T+3. It's T plus when they get around to it. In one of my purchases of Overstock, it was T+21. The vast majority of investors do not have the luxury of delivering stock that they sell at a time of their choosing. A market is unfair when some market participants can ignore rules that others have to follow.
The second common ingredient to past scandals is greed. Greed causes market participants to break the rules. Implicit in the failure to deliver shares to my fund is this: Delivery was delayed because it was financially advantageous to the seller. The seller, in effect, grants himself a free option to take extra time for delivery. The seller's unilateral modification to our agreement (giving the seller as much as three weeks for delivery) is made without my prior notice and consent.
If this implication is correct, that the only logical rationale to delay delivery is because it financially benefits the seller, then any gain to the seller is an ill-gotten gain.
It is an either/or situation for the sellers that failed to deliver Overstock shares to my fund: Either they had my property in their possession and decided to keep it for awhile, or they sold the shares to me without having possession. While the first possibility is a serious infringement of the rules, the second possibility is particularly disturbing.
Selling shares without possession is known as a "naked short". That is, naked shorting is selling shares that are not owned and haven't been borrowed. While market makers are granted the flexibility to naked-short in order to maintain liquidity, that exception should not apply here. Overstock shares have plenty of liquidity. The entire float of Overstock turns over every 13 days. By comparison, it takes 50 days for the entire float of Amazon.com (AMZN:Nasdaq) to turn over.
More importantly, the market-maker exception is not available when a company has had repeated problems in share delivery. Companies with share-delivery problems are placed on a "Threshold List" per regulation SHO, promulgated by the SEC in 2005. If a company has been on the Threshold List for 13 consecutive days, the market maker-exception is no longer available. When I bought Overstock for my fund it had been on the Threshold List for more than 200 days.
Why Is Naked Shorting A Problem?
The problem with naked shorting is that it represents an attack on the fundamental fairness of the market. At the heart of a fair market is a respect for supply and demand. Once the supply component of supply and demand is tinkered with, all bets are off as to the fairness of the marketplace. If there is no cap on the supply of shares -- because market participants are able to sell stock that they don't have -- prices are subject to manipulation.
Manipulation occurs when sellers sell large chunks of stock -- stock that they don't own and haven't borrowed -- in order to drive down the price. Increased supply overwhelms buyers and the stock price is crushed. Sellers then can profit handsomely by buying back the stock at low prices to cover their short position.
For the most part, the fail-to-deliver problem is largely hidden from the average investor.
Investors are generally not informed by their broker when there are delivery problems. The bank that has custody of my mutual fund's assets readily provides me with the information when there are delivery problems. But not my brokers. I bought Overstock shares simultaneously for my mutual fund and for privately managed brokerage accounts. So far, I can't get delivery information from the brokers.
I can't gauge the magnitude of the problem because I can't get answers to some simple questions:
* Why can't I get delivery of Overstock shares on time?
* Why is T+3 not uniformly enforced?
* Why are sellers of Overstock shares keeping my property for a few weeks, or, alternatively, selling me property that they do not have?
* How is it possible for Overstock to have more shares sold short than actually exist in the float?
When evidence suggests problems at the heart of the market involving supply and demand, manipulation of prices, or unevenly applied or unenforced rules, then it is reasonable to say that there is a systemic problem in the market that requires attention.
.............
At time of publication, Alsin and/or ACM was long OSTK, although holdings can change at any time.
Arne Alsin is the founder and principal of Alsin Capital Management, an Oregon-based investment advisor, and portfolio manager of The Turnaround Fund, a no-load mutual fund. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks. Alsin appreciates your feedback; click here to send him an email.
Stock Fraud
Zeev:
Here is an interesting story 107% of OSTK's shares are short. More than the float?
Curious, are shares in your account counterfeit?
God Bless,
TT
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060324/laf044.html?.v=43
Overstock Short Interest Now 107% of Float on Deposit at DTCC
Friday March 24, 6:18 pm ET
SALT LAKE CITY, March 24 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Overstock.com® (Nasdaq: OSTK - News) today reports that per the DTCC's March 10 Security Position Listing, there are 8,970,394 Overstock.com shares on deposit at the DTCC and that the NASDAQ reported short interest in Overstock.com of 9,578,481 shares for the same week. Thus, Overstock.com's reported short interest is now 107% of the shares available to be shorted.
ADVERTISEMENT
(Logo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20030520/LATU020LOGO-a )
Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne said, "The decimal is not misplaced -- we have cracked the speed of light. It is my understanding that some shareholders (e.g., pension funds) might have asked that their shares not be made available to shorts, thus reducing the 8.97 million shares the DTCC has available for lending. I also understand that the 9.58 million stated short interest does not include failed-to-deliver short sales, failed-to-deliver long sales, another category that the DTCC now cryptically calls, 'open positions,' or lending outside the DTCC (i.e., 'ex-clearing'), which only two guys on Staten Island understand. Thus the real ratio is anyone's guess, but it's somewhere between 107% and infinity. On a positive note, the DTCC continues to maintain that their Stock Borrow Program does not permit the creation of new or counterfeit shares: I think that's good, because otherwise this situation could be getting out of control."
About Overstock.com
Overstock.com, Inc. is an online "closeout" retailer, offering discount, brand-name merchandise for sale over the Internet. The company offers its customers an opportunity to shop for bargains conveniently, while offering its suppliers an alternative inventory liquidation distribution channel. Overstock.com, headquartered in Salt Lake City, is a publicly traded company listed on the NASDAQ National Market System and can be found online at http://www.overstock.com.
Overstock.com is a registered trademark of Overstock.com, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective companies.
This press release contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding cracking the speed of light, whether the short position is out of control, and such other risks as identified in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and all our subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which contain and identify important factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those contained in our projections or forward-looking statements.
Hi Zeev:
Maybe this will lead somewhere. Lead story this Sunday on 60 Minutes. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1998/07/08/60minutes/main13502.shtml
God Bless,
TT
Zeev:
I find it curios, that no one on this thread ever expresses concern about the abuses that naked short selling is rendering on our stock markets. No one seems to care?
Gandhi said "first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win"...consider what we participate in, just a thought?
From another site:
This just in - after reading my piece on the San Diego story which paints Herb and Gradient as victims and OSTK as an evil force, the CEO of Buyins.net sent me the following email - and it speaks for itself:
Reporters are not exposing the "truth" in Naked Short Selling scandal.
After the SEC financial journalist subpoena issue flared up, BUYINS.NET, a research firm providing purely factual statistical short sale and naked short sale data, made the unusual gesture of sending Overstock.com's short sale time/sale data to nearly 5,800 financial reporters and business editors free of charge. This "press pass", as it is called in the industry, was designed to put to rest, once and for all, the debate of whether Overstock.com had been illegally short sold or not, and to what degree this activity had occurred.
21.5% of business reporters in the US accepted the offer and reviewed the data. That is nearly 1,250 different reporters that took the time to review the following two charts:
http://www.buyins.com/ostk.gif
http://www.buyins.com/ostkshortdata.gif
Reporters like Bruce Bigelow of The San Diego Union Tribune engaged in multiple conversations with BUYINS.NET’s CEO, Tom Ronk, and were educated in detail as to the process and procedures involved with both legal short selling and illegal naked short selling. They were provided extensive factual data exposing the approximate size of the naked short position in Overstock.com and the exact volume and price of short sales in OSTK for every day back to January 1, 2005. The result? Nothing. Not one mention in Bigelow’s March 19th, 2006 article of the BUYINS.NET stock exchange provided short sale time and sales transactions meticulously identifying every short sale entered in OSTK from January 1, 2005 to present.
The data, the details and the truth about short selling and naked short selling in shares of Overstock.com has continually been buried by the financial press. Would the one real reporter in the United States, please stand up, please stand up…..
God Bless All,
TT
way off topic
Dear Board:
I've been a supporter of the Bush camp prior to the last election mostly based in the family value issues.
There has been some news that has caused me some concern (as I have relatives serving in the armed forces in Iraq). Today of all days the former prime minister of Iraq has stated that a civil war has erupted in Iraq. Contrarily, VP Cheney says all is well and moving forward towards democracy. Emails from relatives only express optimism and desire to return home.
Is there a forum here that discuses this topic?
Sorry for the interruption.
Best wishes, and God Bless,
TT
Hi choad:
Thanks for the kind words. You said "your the man" did you mean "you're the man". Because I'm spoken for and couldn't be "your man".
Good luck and God Bless,
TT
P.S.
couldn't tell by your profile whether you were a man or a rather aggressive woman. My wife wondered?
choad:
Thanks for the advise. Do you have any positions that have done as well as NFI?
TT
Dear Board:
Since 5/2004 I've been a shareholder of NFI. I've collected $11.00 in dividends and $13.50 in option writing (per share) that has brought my cost basis to $10.50 a share. I made some mistakes by selling a lot of puts when the stock was in the $40's and wound up with a lot more shares than I bargained for....
Been blessed in my opinion,
Any opinions? Zeev?
God Bless,
TT
Zeev:
Did you agree that this might be the tip of the iceberg?
Here is a picture of Jim Cramer with BULL scribbled over the subpoena sent to him by the SEC.
Is he above that kind of sanction?
Just curious.
http://thesanitycheck.com/Portals/0/cramersubpoena2.jpg
Good luck and God Bless,
TT
AD:
I don't condemn anyone. I've been following the story only. I just watched Jim Cramers Mad Money and he threw his subpoena from the SEC on the floor during his program.
Now as my kids would say "that's in your face".
God Bless,
TT
Hi Zeev: Jim Cramer note..
I know you are not interested in the naked short selling scandal on Wall Street but I thought some of the posters who read here might be.
Jim Cramer has been subpoenaed by the SEC and also a host of Wall Street business journalists? Herb Greenberg, Carol Redmond, The Street.com. Some suggest that some parties are accused of collaborating with analysts that front run stocks before negative news articles hit the newswires.
Anyhow, I think this is only the tip of the iceberg.
http://www.thestreet.com/_tscfoc/markets/marketfeatures/10270634.html
Good luck to you and God Bless,
TT
Thanks tuna, always next year. The impending market conditions are more important to me now than the Cotton Bowl. We have a huge problem with the markets now, comparable to the S&L collapse of the 1980's.
And no one seems to care? Just like when we were warned before?
Interesting!
Good luck and God Bless,
TT
Check this:
Read watch and listen.
Part 2 http://www.businessjive.com/nss2/darkside2.html
Part 1 http://www.businessjive.com/nss/darkside.html
The North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. discovered at it's Nov.30 seminar on Naked Short Selling that Naked Short Selling on Wall Street is pervasive and it has been suggested that as many as 30% of the total daily trades on Wall Street may be Failure to Deliver FTD's or COUNTERFEIT shares. http://www.ncans.net/files/NASAAtrans.pdf
http://www.nasaa.org/NASAA_Newsroom/Current_NASAA_Headlines/3923.cfm
I don't think this problem is farfetched. If one remembers the S&L Crisis of the 1980's and that a group of criminals could be making abusive and fraudulent loans from over hundreds of S&L's for years, in full view of the regulators. And yet that is now established historical fact.
Something to think about when you invest your money??
Good luck and God Bless,
TT
Thank you Fed for your kind words and no I haven't lost any money on OSTK.
TT
Happy New Year and God Bless, TT
Naked Short Selling and the Fraudulent Stock Transaction crisis is the largest financial crisis to hit our market system in the last hundred years.
There are those that believe that the financial crisis of the century is being perpetrated by Wall Street's counterfeiting of stock, under the complicit eye of a compromised regulator the SEC.
Do we care! I've posted these links before.
Here are two links which explain the problem in detail which will cause the eventual collapse of the stock market in the way we know it. DO YOU CARE?
Presented by OSTK CEO Patrick Byrne!
Read watch and listen.
Part 2 http://www.businessjive.com/nss2/darkside2.html
Part 1 http://www.businessjive.com/nss/darkside.html
God Bless and PLEASE pay attention and give this topic it's due attention before it's too late!
TT
Greg: That's too bad you've closed your mind. Whatever?
Good luck and God Bless there is always hope. Thanks for responding.
TT
Presented by OSTK CEO Patrick Byrne!
Read watch and listen.
Part 2 http://www.businessjive.com/nss2/darkside2.html
Part 1 http://www.businessjive.com/nss/darkside.html
God Bless and PLEASE pay attention and give this topic it's due attention before it's too late!
TT
Which begs the question, did you listen or ignore? Did you visit the NASAA website? are you too lazy? is your mind made up?
Presented by OSTK CEO Patrick Byrne!
Read watch and listen.
Part 2 http://www.businessjive.com/nss2/darkside2.html
Part 1 http://www.businessjive.com/nss/darkside.html
God Bless and PLEASE pay attention and give this topic it's due attention before it's too late!
TT
What does bye bye mean. Are you ignorant of the problem?
God Bless,
TT
Another commentary http://www.cross-currents.net/commentary.htm
December 24, 2005
"Another Look At NovaStar"
Well over a year ago, we commenced a series on NovaStar Financial (NYSE-NFI), focusing on naked short selling and the apparent efforts of shorts to destroy the company. After months of subsequently covering the circumstances surrounding the tremendous number of shares that had failed-to-deliver per SEC regulations for NFI and other companies, naked shorting, a complete lack of transparency by self regulatory organizations (SROs), the activities of concerted short pools and journalist biases, we think another look at NFI is quite appropriate.
Short positions in NovaStar Financial (NYSE-NFI) began to build in July 2002, as short interest rose from 0.1% to 3.5% of all issued shares. By October, short interest had exploded to 15% of the company's capitalization and by June of 2003, shares short equaled 26.1% of NovaStar's issued stock. In November 2004, short interest rose to an astounding peak, 45.1% of all authorized and outstanding shares. But as the company declared and paid dividends, those that were short the shares had to pay the dividend to "owners" on the other side of the short sale transaction. Dividends paid in this manner did not necessarily go to the exact same party that actually purchased the shorted shares. In practice, short accounts were debited by their brokers for the amount of the dividend, which was then doled out to longs whose shares had been borrowed for the purpose of shorting. Since those dividends did not actually come from Novastar, they were marked as "PIL," short for "payment in lieu [of the dividend]."
Since July 2002, NovaStar shorts have paid out the amazing total of over $124 million in PIL to those they borrowed the stock from. Exactly three years ago, almost one of every five shares of NFI was shorted. Let's assume a worst scenario for long term bears who received average proceeds of $8 for their short sale. Since that time, they have paid out nearly $18 in PIL for the privilege of remaining short. Thus, they are now in the hole to the tune of at least $9 per shorted share, even if the shares were to go to zero tomorrow. In fact, virtually every share shorted before mid-April 2003 can never hit the profit column. Obviously, shorter term bears have fared relatively better and some are in the profit column after paying dividends of $6.85 over the last year or perhaps are only breakeven after paying out $12.20 over the past two years.
Incredibly, it appears that only those institutions and individuals long the shares really understand NFI's business and those short have perilously underestimated exactly how the company functions. For our part, we're guessing that even if loan production drops to zero tomorrow, there should be sufficient income built in from their current portfolio for NovaStar to pay out another $18 to shareholders over the next two years. After that, the guesses become a lot more muddled but a smaller continuing stream of income seems likely. So, why would anyone remain short? Our best answer: strength in numbers.
At present, 31.1% of NovaStar's shares are short. The authorized capitalization of 30.873 million shares is burdened by an additional 9.614 million shares that have been shorted but in reality, are nevertheless "owned" by those on the other side of the short transaction. Thus, if those long Novastar precisely counted their verifiable ownership, it would total 40.487 million shares. As we stated previously, there cannot be a scintilla of doubt that a smaller piece of any pie must be worth less than a larger piece. In this case, a shareholder vote for any proposition would require that the "owners" of borrowed shares receive a vote equal to at most, 76.25% of a full share. Something is horribly remiss with this situation!
NFI's authorized and outstanding capitalization is corrupted by the presence of additional ownership catalyzed by the absolutely enormous short positions in this company. Bear in mind that at least 150,000 shares have not even been delivered to the accounts of their new owners. NFI has appeared on the Reg. SHO Threshold list for 108 trading days this year. The list details securities where failed deliveries of shorts are at least 0.5% of the outstanding stock. The total of undelivered shares could be well into the millions but no one is talking, not the NYSE, not the DTCC, not the NSCC, nor the SEC. None of the entities responsible for running our markets want you to know the truth. Why?!
Oh, and by the way, shorts will have to fork over yet another $13.5 million in PIL in January. Ironically and amazingly, the hole in short's pockets remains the impetus to short even more shares. At this juncture, the only way for shorts to recoup their PIL and to escape unscathed is to attempt to engineer a continuing price decline, if at all possible - and zero is their goal, no matter the cost to shareholders. If another 5 million shares can be shorted, the effective capitalization of Novastar will reach 45 million shares, 50% more than issued. A smaller piece of the pie must be worth less. Make no mistake, this is a battle between the good guys and the bad guys. But could shorts be committing suicide?
NovaStar ended the third quarter with $6.40 per share of undistributed 2005 taxable income. The company will likely need to pay a special dividend of about $3 per share by September 2006 in order to meet its 2005 payout obligation. And because the first three quarterly dividends in 2006 will be paid from 2005 taxable income, we would expect there to be a very substantial accumulation of undistributed 2006 taxable income by that time. In other words, the odds look good for a sustainable dividend. We believe the good guys are going to win.
Greg, really I don't know you either. Here is proof of the problem and it's implications if you care..and it's not BB stocks http://www.ncans.net/files/NASAAtrans.pdf
Study if you are interested. Ignore if you don't care about yours or your childrens investments!!
Here are the panelists that think there is a problem:
Current NASAA Headlines
November 22, 2005
Panelists Set For NASAA Forum on Naked Short Selling
Experts to Gather November 30 in Washington
Washington—The North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc., (NASAA) today announced participants for its upcoming “NASAA Listens” Forum to explore possible market manipulation through naked short selling activity. The forum is scheduled for November 30 from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. at the Paris Ballroom of the Sofitel Lafayette Square Hotel, 806 15th Street NW, in Washington, D.C.
The “NASAA Listens” Forum will bring together a panel of leading financial and academic experts to examine problems associated with abusive naked short selling and the impact of Regulation SHO on naked short-selling transactions. Connecticut Securities Director Ralph A. Lambiase will moderate the Forum. Panelists include:
* JAMES J. ANGEL, Associate Professor of Finance at the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University.
* JAMES BRIGAGLIANO, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
* PETER J. CHEPUCAVAGE, General Counsel of Plexus Consulting Group, LLC in Washington, D.C.
* JOHN FINNERTY, Professor of Finance at Fordham University Graduate School of Business Administration and a Principal with Analysis Group, Inc.
* ANAND RAMTAHAL, Vice President, Division of Member Firm Regulation, New York Stock Exchange.
* ROBERT SHAPIRO, co-founder and chairman of Sonecon, LLC, and former U.S. Under Secretary of Commerce for Economic Affairs.
* SUSANNE TRIMBATH, Chief Executive Officer of STP Advisory Services and Chief Economist.
* NASD, a representative of the NASD has been invited.
Did you listen to the links I posted??? or did you cover your eyes?
TT
That my friend is an insane statement. You obviously have not studied the problem. Don't you want facts? Are you ignorant? do you care? or are you the problem? Look inside!
TT
Zeev, Naked Short Selling and the Fraudulent Stock Transaction crisis is the largest financial crisis to hit our market system in the last hundred years.
Why are you and this thread turning a blind eye to this problem???
Zeev,there are those that believe that the financial crisis of the century is being perpetrated by Wall Street's counterfeiting of stock, under the complicit eye of a compromised regulator the SEC.
Do you care! I've posted these links before, yet you IGNORE?? Are there people here that are part of the problem? Which begs the question of why you are so complicit.
Here are two links which explain the problem in detail which will cause the eventual collapse of the stock market in the way we know it. DO YOU CARE?
Presented by OSTK CEO Patrick Byrne!
Read watch and listen.
Part 2 http://www.businessjive.com/nss2/darkside2.html
Part 1 http://www.businessjive.com/nss/darkside.html
God Bless and PLEASE pay attention and give this topic it's due attention before it's too late!
TT
Osprey:
Here's Patrick Byrne:
http://www.businessjive.com/nss/darkside.html
God Bless,
TT
Corruption and Destruction of Our Capital Markets
http://www.businessjive.com/nss/darkside.html
NEW - Animated, Narrated Slideshow by Dr. Patrick Byrne, CEO of OSTK, which describes the process and the scope of the FTD problem. This is an amazing effort, which should be distributed to every person you know. There is now no excuse for ignorance of the problem.
God Bless,
TT