Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ok, have been reading the posts. Has there been anything definitive about the India licensing agreement? That's supposed to be a million bucks and no one has mentioned it in a while. Any news that I missed?
Wow...finished up the semester and haven't been paying too much attention. Stock went way down and still even though one of the PR's mentioned that India revenue was payable, it didn't turn up on the financials as a receivable.
Can anyone fill me in on what's going on?
Oh *lol* You're right there, Charlie.
Hmm, there's an Ink Global with offices in CHI, FLL and India, but it appears to be a staffing agency. Not sure if that's the group that negotiated the deals in India.
inkgc.com/about.html
BBB or JB61, I can't send a private message or I would.
Do you know why, if the contract with India was signed, that the 10Q doesn't show an accrued asset that can be reversed to revenue once the check gets there?
The initial licensing fee was already "earned" technically with the signing of the contract as rights to use the technology passed to the coal producers involved in India. And the cash is realizable if not yet realized.
Are you kidding? INK Global Consulting? You can't find that on the internet...?
I believe the website is http://www.inkglobalgroup.com if you really need some help.
Thanks, Nabbbss. I'd really hate to have one of my posts show up on the grammar bashing board where you've enjoyed a good laugh at some of our people who use English as a second language.
Really...a Geology major? Isn't that something? And you grew up in a coal field. Were you raised by wolves? I'm so glad you dropped by this little po'dunk messaging board to grace us with your expert opinion. What a chum!
Or as my dad would say "What a bucket of chum..."
You know, if this seemed more like a public service announcement, I might be a little more interested. But someone who had no interest in the stock either way would have better things to do with his time than mention its faults. Therefore, the assumption is all you bashers lead really, really sad lives. :) Or you have an interest one way or the other which totally invalidates all of your posts. Neither is very pretty.
Off to study for my finance final. Thursday is going to be the killer.
GLTA...but mostly ME!!!! *lol*
I have one beef.
A "final contract" with India is signed. But they're still negotiating...?
Why aren't there deferred assets/liabilities on the books reflecting that signed contract? Even if they're still negotiating, a contract is binding and even a VERY conservative estimate should be on the books.
Now we agree, Charlie48. I think that's a little unnecessary, too!
Not really. Just picked up a little momentum b/c people weren't willing to sell any lower and some MoMo's jumped in. We're also still trading within our range of .10-.18 so we don't need a PR or anything really specific to move within it, just some of the right variables. The Admiral taught me that.
MACD is cranking up for a cross over, Volume Accumulation is still positive, we're edging up to the 50 day moving average. Can we say pressure cooker?
ETMM is up to something and it's ugly. He keeps walking the price back down.
Coger, you are the MAN!
Not much standing in the way of our being back to .13. Two MM's at .121. Would be nice to clean them out, but I'm tapped.
Ah, correction. VERT, NITE, ETMM, and MURF are once again stifling the ask. I "love" those guys.
with a huge bank account and the backing of the Chinese government. Narrows down your little pun, no?
It's posted on the government website and it's an historic event, really. CCTC is leading the way in introducing American tech to curb the ever growing problem of the mass industrial revolution and pollution problem in China. The Chinese are innovative and a huge exporter to us. It would be nice to see our GDP increased from the exchange a little!
Thanks, BBB.
Time value of money and risk vs. return and all that jazz need to be the roots of the next PR.
Back to basics to bring in the big bucks? Yeah, that was cheesy. Ok, but it is true. I really think big money will look at fundamentals more than chart analysis, so ring all the bells and press all the buttons highlighting that.
Ask up to .12...on this volume, too.
I just started playing the market in February and I've learned so much from reading and posting on this board.
There's one thing I've yet to see though, that I'd really like to study intensely. A SHORT SQUEEZE!!!!
I was only confirming that everyone starts somewhere. CCTC has a long way to go before they hit 30B shares outstanding.
And if we get news of a signed contract, we have quite a few years before we need worry about failure.
I'll post to that! Thanks, JB. You're a CPA, right? I'm finishing up my junior year in Acct :)
Some just bought 500 shares at the ask price. Wonder what that's all about...*lol*
Thanks, Rock.
I was just going to post that AAPL has 909M shares out and I think Citigroup is pushing 30B.
Sometimes, if the money is good, a company can be worth over a billion dollars. If this company can take the lead on market share for this type of product, 500M shares could be worth...A LOT.
Edurk,
It's hard to see .097 actually hitting. I hope this goal of .097 isn't preventing people from buying in at these prices.
RSI took an upturn on the daily chart, Accumulation is positive, we have a BUY signal from the bulls, even the DMI+ is curving up, indicative of a bottom, especially if you look at how CCTC's DMI+ behaved for the last year.
We could actually see another green day today and holy hell next week.
Thanks, ptrigger :)
BIGMONEYPLAYA, thanks for posting the American Bulls stuff, but I'm really over the .20 by X play. Pumping is worse than bashing any day of the week. Kinda' makes me nauseous.
For anyone in this stock, .20 isn't even a target price anyway.
Regardless of that, I'm actually in dreamland envisioning a world in which every single coal plant reduced it's greenhouse emissions by 70%. That's ...HUGE!
More like Mitchell Shapiro is the private investor who put up the funds for the recent marketing efforts and the funding CCTC needed for the China contract.
Just a guess.
Or he's the lawyer who did all the draft work and word choices ;)
I think only a short squeeze would push us past .94. Or exact (meaning what's on paper with signatures in ink) details letting us know that the present values of the future cash flows of both the India and China deals are worth more than 500 million.
And I think Benham has 25% interest in the company, no? So they get their cut, too.
Of course, when the 1B ton plant is built in China, CCTC will be a multibillion dollar company off those revenues alone. That's a pretty bright future.
Are we even a little excited that VERT and MURF have abandoned the teens to a position of .61 and .44 respectively? Now if ETMM would just ...well, long walks, short piers come to mind.
Suddenly the bashers' posts don't seem as offensive today *lol*.
Frantic, maybe? Ah, well...can't say this hasn't been one helluva ride regardless of what happens next week. I'll bet Doug and CJ are breathing a huge sigh of relief. Maybe next year they won't have to cash in stock to get paid a decent salary.
That has to be the funniest thing I've read in a WHILE! We're all hopeful, mullet, but not THAT hopeful *lol*.
Letting it sit in the Fortune magazine would be a mistake. He'd miss all the momentum players to drive the price up before the big money in Coal got a chance to see a stock on the run.
A PR before would be perfect to draw in everybody.
Something I really like...that Hague and Hunt didn't sell their shares at the release of a PR or on a high trend. I mean no one likes to see a few million shares trade at the bid price, but at least they weren't playing around with the numbers.
That's pretty upstanding and outstanding when you're talking about that many shares and that much money. This has probably already been posted since the Form 4's were posted days ago. Haven't been keeping up too well. It's finals week.
And I've decided I just don't like ETMM.
That's all.
Because the market is fast, but we're crazy CCTC hawks who want to "know what Doug had for breakfast" and we just found out. It's not even published on the front page but in Target Market. But with that info we're all putting in Buy orders because a PR is imminent.
Coger, I wish I knew what you were really trying to say. Cracks me up trying to decipher it, so keep posting, buddy!
That is some beautiful stuff on the website. It specifically states signed contract and it doesn't take a lawyer to clarify that language. That's what I've been waiting for. :) Concrete!
Damn, wish I'd played the drop now since the website info was published before a PR. Oh, well...no crystal ball here.
Just a note from an accounting standpoint:
Just because the India check has not technically been released in a PR, if the contract there was actually signed, they MUST recognize the revenue in the upcoming 10-Q. If that India revenue doesn't show there, I will definitely worry without some other fantastic CONCRETE news.
The 10-Q will tell all, IMO.
You SAID it, jfs!
Some people take being responsible for their own decisions a bit too lightly. If you bought it, live with it. If you sold it, live with it :)
Could it be this Eric Adams?
Biography for
Eric J. Adams More at IMDbPro »
advertisement
Mini Biography
Eric J. Adams is a producer, director, screenwriter, and novelist. He co-wrote and produced the feature film _My Suicide (2006)_, and wrote and directed the documentary To Save A Child, a searing look into the world of suicidal pre-teens, hosted by Mariel Hemingway. He has produced a number of short films and is in development on Supremacy, a full-length feature film based on the true story of a black family held hostage by an Aryan Brotherhood fugitive.
Eric is the author of the suspense/thrillers Plot Twist (St. Martin's Press) and Birdland (Hodder & Stoughton). An award-winning investigative journalist, Eric's work has appeared in The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, Salon, Wired and many other publications.
Yes, but VERT doesn't ever seem to be done. We've been blaming MM's for their shenanigans, but we all know that's very short term. They're taking an open opportunity to make cash while we're waiting for the revenue PR. Can't fault them. Doug is pushing out to the last opportunities in April to submit a PR about revenues, so they've had time.
I think he'd be better served with an email list that people can sign up to rather than have everyone wait for PR's anyway--if he wants real shareholders and not volume players that is. All the "this will be over .50 or over 1.00 or even .001" is total BS pumping and bashing. The market will do what it wants to in response to news and, as we've seen, it's not going to respond to anything like news articles and maybes. We might stay between .10 and .18 for the rest of the year, but if Doug keeps putting these wildcards into play, it's only a matter of TIME (nasty word, no?) until contracts start rolling in. And a company that's making real money doesn't trade in the .10-.18 range.
I agree. If the ask is hammered, the stock should go up. Not so with VERT, MURF and ETMM sitting on the docket.
Hmmm, wish someone could sweep out all those 15's. I think it's odd that there's nothing in between the .15's and .19's. I like it, but it's odd.