Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Simple: we all signed Non Disclosure agreements. You won't be seeing it on You Tube! LOL!!
Jeez: I wonder what was taking the image of his hand while he was opening and closing his fist at the Open House? I know you think he was "hand syncing" right? LOL!!!!!!!!
Interesting how you keep mentioning all the shares Dean is dumping. If so, why does the amount of shares he owns (look it up under key shareholders) still show him holding the 59 million shares he has held for the last couple of years? The number has not changed. If he is doing what you say he is, wouldn't it seem logical the number of shares he holds would go down?
No one is going to find out that information in my opinion. Can you imagine the harrassment they would get from people on this board? Again: my opinion.
Not true! The old reviewer was part of the meeting.
You're a funny guy! No "off loading" going on here. I've been here 5 1/2 years, know Mike, Dean, and Becky, and will see it through as I believe this stock will finish at around $2.00 minimum per share when all is said and done. Why would I sell now?
I have to agree with you for once! You might have had some issues with more people than just Dean Janes! LOL!!
Maybe "you" already know, but of course your "opinion" is the only thing people should believe right? LOL!!! The imaging format is now set by the FDA (remember: Dean met with them). We should know how it comes out when Imaging3 submits the new 510K at the end of this year or first quarter of next year.
Couldn't be a third option like the FDA being very slow right? :)
Funny! I think we'll know by the first of the year! :)
Kimble, I doubt you have any idea what was shown either. Besides, you were not at the Open House. Should not be calling Vibe out for his lack of knowledge when yours is suspicious as well! :)
Oh by the way: I was at the Open House, and I agree with the other people who were there. The machine appears to be the real deal.
I didn't say I did not sell some shares. I sold a couple hundred thousand shares at an average of $.76 per share. This was enough to get my investment back and plenty more. Could I have sold more? Absolutely, but as I said, I am convinced the price per share will be way beyond the $1.95 high we saw. Just my opinion.
We were told THIS meeting that funds are available. Can't answer your question on Cranshire specifically.
That's your OPINION! I still hold 800,000 share, I'm a friend of Dean's and Brian, and I DID NOT SELL all my shares on the "run up." Opposite your OPINION, many of us longs believe we are going to make MORE than the $1.95 high the stock reached during the "run up."
Duh! He's a large shareholder. Should he not be interested?
It does work. I was in the front row!! I didn't see a whole bunch of desperation though. Dean and Brian seemed like they were in as good a mood as the rest of us!!
Again, think positive thoughts. We can help our friends who are still invested if we can get the share price back up for all of them. :)
I hope it works out for your friends too! Let's help get this price per share back up, and everyone can have a happy ending!! :}
Sounds like a GREAT buying opportunity!! :)
It works everybody!!! I'm with Vibetech1: it was worth the drive in traffic to be there! I especially loved the applause at the end of Dean's demonstration. No more doubt!!!!!!!! :)
I'll be there!
The Alliance/Wowio event was at the Beverly Hills Hilton. Date: Around March, 2010. I was at the event.
I agree Optimus. Why sell now?
You probably won't get many of us longs posting in this Imaging3 climate, but I for one am planning on hanging in there no matter what happens as I believe the company is going to win in the end. Watch for KingKongGuru's posts. I think he is the one key knowledgeable poster on the board, and he still believes!! :)
Thanks Vibe! You're right Vinovista did some great work today as well. Vino, please continue to add your expertise to the board. It is much needed! Feel free to bring in some other experts as well!
Sorry Gymbob. After re reading your post, you got it right. The correction now says "proof of concept."
You have it backwards. They first sent the email out using the term "point of concept." The follow up email with the correction says they made a mistake, and it should read "proof of concept!"
I totally agree KKG. What's the old saying: "95% of something is better than 100% of nothing!" Do what you have to do Dean!
My guess is they will produce a video of the machine in action, and that's what will be shown to Don. If so, they could reuse the video wherever they choose right?
I think Dean will show what the attorneys allow him to show. Wouldn't you? It's going to be what it's going to be, not what we want, but what is legal for Dean to provide to us. Period!!
Personally, no matter what happens, I am in it until the end. One way or the other. I have taken my position, and I will live with the results: good or bad. After five years of involvement, I think we will all know where we are going soon enough. I suggest you and others place (or remove) your bets as well.
I agree Guru. I would have to believe Dean will be working in close association with the new attorneys/consultants in the production of any video, and I would doubt he would release any final product without their consent and blessings.
I guess we will find out the proof part in a couple of weeks! :) Again, you better place your bets.
Then many of you on this board are going to have to make a decision to sell or buy. I tend to agree with KingKongGuru that if Dean pulls off a great presentation, those of you who did not get in missed the boat. If he doesn't pull it off, then I guess none of us will have to put up with each other again! :)
LOL! Prove to us ALL of the calls started after February 22nd. Like Stockmasterflash said: investors are always calling attorneys trying to get a market edge.
You kind of answered your own question. I would guess people have been trying to communicate with MWE since they were announced as Imaging3's attorneys trying to get some kind of market edge. Again, I can't see how that kind of behavior strengthens a working relationship. IMO
I agree with you Dodger: many people are speculating as to what is going on behind the scenes, but the truth is: none of us knows exactly what is going on in REAL life!
In my opinion, I think it would be reckless for Imaging3 to reveal who the new attorney group is due to all the inquiries people from this board have made to the MWE office. I can't imagine how all that activity helped the Imaging3/MWE relationship.
No: nice try on your part! LOL As I said: after researching my correspondence with Mike, he never specifically mentions MWE. Again, it was an assumption on my part, and that's not his fault. It is mine. I apologize to the board if I mislead anyone.
In my opinion, even if MWE is no longer on board, I am confident Dean has us in good hands with whoever our consultants and attorneys are!! I still have faith in Imaging3 even if some of you don't. That's just the way it is!
Update: after checking my email correspondence with Mike Nessen since the first of the year, I see no specific mention of MWE as our law firm. If I mentioned MWE, then it was an assumption on my part and no fault belongs to Mike Nessen.
Again, if Mike says our consultants / attorneys are doing fine, I trust we are in good hands with whomever is handling Imaging3!
It's very possible it was an assumption on my part! In hindsight, I just remember hearing Imaging3's consulting and attorney situation was fine.
Whether it's MWE or another attorney group, I am confident Dean is doing what is necessary to get this thing over "FDA goal line!"
Not misleading. I was told the attorney/consultant situation is fine. There was never any mention of MWE. I take that to mean our attorney/consultant situation is fine.
I exchanged emails with Mike Nessen today, but I have not talked with him for a few weeks. I let him know in my email that I would like to talk with him, and he said he will call me soon. Hopefully, I will hear from him in the next day or two.
I will report to the board when I hear from him.
Wow! Thanks. I have been around for 5 years, so yes I remember the IDE ruling by the FDA. You seem to forget that the company decided to go the 510K route instead of the IDE route, so they could not test the device ANYWHERE per the FDA! Go back and show me where the company said they were testing the device someplace.
Sites did want to test the machine, and they had sites picked out, but when the decision was made to do a 510K instead, Imaging3 had to change direction from placing machines as that would be a violation of FDA policy.