I don't know but I been told it's hard to run with the weight of gold Other hand I heard it said it's just as hard with the weight of lead
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Shares Outstanding: 257,028,351 as of September 26, 2014
Float: 224,489,940 as of September 26, 2014
Right now I would be ecstatic if we were just able to see a million dollars worth of that gold. I know that they are working hard and face many difficulties that we behind the keyboards never know or understand, but they are doing things with safety first in mind and are setting up the mine to rock n roll. I hope they can do it, I like rock n roll especially when the nuggets are rocking and rolling out of the mill.
Maybe you should ask the company instead of the message board...
North Bay Resources Inc.
PO Box 162
Skippack, PA 19474 USA
Tel: 215-661-1100
FAX: 215-661-8959
email: corporate@northbayresources.com
No one here has the answer, nor can they make it happen. Sounds like way to spend more money that could be better used elsewhere.
Oh look there goes a load of gravel, two or three hours later of nothing happening, oh look there goes more gravel wooohoo completely mesmerizing...
Shares Outstanding: 257,028,351 as of September 26, 2014
Float: 224,489,940 as of September 26, 2014
According to some they think he should be "trying to get gravel from the North Terrace, or South Terrace, or digging up ram's horns, not yakking all day long."
I guess he is supposed to be actually mining, along with running the company and making great deals to make huge profits by selling properties, and keeping up with the other properties, and expanding the claims in the Fraser area, and hiring competent geologist to do reports. Makes sense to me.
Really why should he just do his job when he could be doing all the jobs?
Scientists estimate that 44 tonnes (44,000 kilograms, about 48.5 tons) of meteoritic material falls on the Earth each day. Several meteors per hour can usually be seen on any given night. Sometimes the number increases dramatically - these events are termed meteor showers.
Chunks of rock and metal from asteroids and other planetary bodies that survive their journey through the atmosphere and fall to the ground are called meteorites, some are larger than a building.
OMG what if one hit the Ruby Mine? Based on the evidence 44 tonnes per day fall to earth just one that is less than a tonne could shut down operations for many years. Seems awful risky to invest in NBRI with all this meteorite activity on a daily basis.
Whit if it snows, what if this, what if that? what if there's a glacier(lol) or an avalanche, hehehe. Why not just break out the magic eight ball? It does not matter. Que Sera, Sera!
Thanks lemon but that has nothing to do with the conversation in which I was engaged. Why don't you go check the nbri website.
Wow another person I asked to back up their statements with a little evidence(you know some facts), and nothing factual is ever returned.
should be easy for someone with all that experience to show some sort of facts, but never mind, I understand completely you do not need to prove anything. Thanks for your time.
How about if that's your opinion lets see those figures, a complete breakdown that says exactly how much it would cost please.
so your opinion is the cost per ounces to run a tailings pile is over $1000 per ounce? Hmm that's really interesting makes me wonder.
That would be the first thing I would mine it would be an easy return and provide funding for further operations in the area.
I guess a thousands easy to recover ounces are not good enough now, no matter what it is, it is never good enough.
oh well who needs around 1 million dollars for running an easy to work tailing pile. FFS it's still nearly 1000 oz.
No one even came close to saying they are switching from one subject, to another but you.
Do you have some info to suggest that they have switched from working on the Ruby mine to anything else?
Work still continues at the Ruby toward the goal.
Really is it so far fetched to think that they may pick up a phone and call a geologist to do a report on one of their properties.
Wow that must have taken all of an hour or so at most, and then maybe mail some documentation, oh the time spent on filling out some paperwork. What a clerical nightmare that must have been in your opinion.
Have you talked to Perry and did he switch the focus to something other than the Ruby?
It's a freakin report by a geologist they hired so no resources were taken away from the Ruby mine.
Certainly a laymen knows better how to run a the company.
I guess some people do not expect NBRI to be able to do some minimal multitasking. sad
North Bay Resources, Inc. (OTCQB: NBRI) is a junior mining company with operations in the US and Canada. In the US, the Company's subsidiary, Ruby Gold, Inc., owns and operates the Ruby Mine in Sierra County, California. The Ruby is known to have produced over 350,000 ounces of gold since the 1850's. The Ruby Property covers approximately 2,312 acres, only a small portion of which has been explored to date.
Get a full report and updates on the company’s operations here: http://bit.ly/-NBRI-AnalystReport
Claims about what?
you can even look to google for help find any solid proof to support your positions.
Just keep avoiding it and not posting the facts.
Remember we were talking about the 43-101 to start with.
AGAIN LINK?
Why should he have one? He did not make outrageous claims!
You have claims about things that you can not justify that is the point.
still avoiding the question eh?
lmao you said and I quote
I did not ask for your opinion I asked for FACTS, LINKED FACTS
Show me how the geologist mislead people and how he is risking his career by misleading people and falsifying the 43-101 report.
If you or anyone else is qualified to do the studies and review the geologist work and prove that is it wrong I welcome that 100%.
STILL WAITING
Oh, I thought that you said it was the dilution just a couple of post ago. Now you are calling into question the the credentials and reliability of the geologist that wrote the reports.
This is getting really weird...
right there it is you insinuated that it was the dilution now it's people don't trust the geologist... lmao
I asked you to show me proof of how the 43-101 reports are connected to the pps.
maybe you just skipped over the first line of the post you were replying to:
The 43-101 reports have guidelines that are meant to prevent fraud.
The reports were originated after the Bre-X Minerals Ltd. scandal in the 1990s involving inflated mineral resource estimates. After reaching a market capitalization of around $6.4 billion (adjusted for inflation), company's fraud began to unveil when its geologist Michael de Guzman died in an accident and it was then determined that ore samples had been salted with gold dust.
But what truth is proof against all lies?
I know exactly what you said:
Obviously there is not any problem with the report, except from your point of view. Otherwise there would be some documentation detailing any problems associated with it. If you believe that it should not be labeled as 43-101 or is not a 43-101 compliant report, by all means contact the BCSC and tell them all about what you believe to be so wrong with it, and tell them Jacques Houle P.Eng is wrong and is doing his job wrong, and be sure to let them know how you would do things better.
Jacques was the Regional Geologist for Southwest B.C. with the Ministry of Energy and Mines. I guess that is not relevant and makes NBRI look like they are trying to deceive folks by using someone very familiar with Canadian regulations regarding such reports. REALLY? That would only be irrelevant to someone that did not understand that because it only reinforces the credibility of the report.
Why would NBRI even post it on the British Colombia government web site if it was not on the up and up? It is after all about a property located in B.C.
Did anyone even consider that NBRI may one day want to trade in Canada?
Miners Mag, speaking of B.S. period, got it!!!
Thanks for the miners report....
miners who mined that did not report seeing anything startling (their friends and relatives are not buying the stock).
LINK?
I did not risk more than I could afford to lose and I have an understanding of the delays that can be and most of the time are encountered when starting up mining operations anywhere in the world.
Fact is NBRI is undervalued and the fact is they are still moving forward. Sorry to all of those that had a different time line than what reality is dictating. I for one am glad to have spent so much time on real dd or else I would end up like the guys in the picture.
Nice, I'm looking forward to seeing those nuggets.
So are you operating a gold mine similar to the Ruby and doing it better?
Read the post I replied to especially the last sentence.