Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
LOL!!! Trackmoist isn't news. Been around for awhile and still hasn't contributed much to bottom line. Check financials before parting with your money into this pump and dump. Back to .006 by Monday.
Agreed! He can't sell a great product. Believed his own koolaid. Never had enough marketing of product to give it a chance. Nothing has changed after R/S.
2 Mil diluted in first month after R/S.
Cycle starting over. Until WNBD stops bleeding and starts making money, this is heading for another R/S fast. I'll wait until I see WNBD in the black, if that ever happens, before I even think of buying in again. Eric needs to supply black and white results not just talk.
Anyone know if this has any significance? It was tagged to the 500 r/s.
**indicates NSCC Eligible Security (National Securities Clearing Corporation)
Or someone can sell their shares at the ask waiting for a buyer just the same as someone on the bid is hoping someone will sell to them at the lower price. A seller doesn't have sell to the bid and a buyer doesn't have to buy at the ask. They can wait and see if they get filled.
Good thing that most of the volume lately has been trades at .0002 no matter which side of the trade you're on.
Hmmm... How can you buy at .0002 if no one can sell at .0002
Ahhh.... A mystery....
Closing price .0002
You asked if it was public. I answered your question and Doog was kind enough to do some of the work for you. If you weren't truly interested, why waste others time?
Seems they still get excited given the info you dug. I was just saying the data is public answering Blackbeerd's question whether it was private or public info.
If I had to guess I'd say the Doherty's were doing the effort for a percentage of the sales. Just a guess though.
Thanks for digging up the data.
This is well known public info if you care to do the research. You may need to go back a couple of years since GSA has been in work for awhile.
Sorry to lose you as a customer... Wouldn't make since to recall every strong smelling stain remover. There wouldn't beach on the shelves.
Currently trade WNBD with Fidelity with no problem over the last 7 years. Fidelity doesn't seem to have an issue with WNBD so I don't get the context of your post.
The R/S for uplisting has been stated as a likely scenario for quite awhile. It shouldn't be treated like this news is such a surprise to longs. If it is a surprise, then someone hasn't been watching WNBD very close. Question being is which direction the pps after the R/S.
May I suggest Fidelity as a broker if you plan on selling. Sounds like you pay way too much for fees..
If things are going south like you say, follow your instincts and sell at .0001 where there are still plenty of buyers. Sell now. Could be too late later... R/S and the sky is falling and all that... LOL
Still waiting on your 50 million share sell. Don't see them at the ask. Are you planning on selling to the bid?
Never said there weren't some bad early years that could be extrapulated by issued shares, PPS, and marketing/sales results. There was also some good progress made in the early years in developing the product and getting into to main stream chains in Canada and equally there are no published company financials that I know of to validate the financial progress of the company one way or the other in the early qtrs of WNBD's existance. I just wasn't making the claim that they WNBD missed their goals in the early qtrs as you are. As you say, trust the numbers...
Do you have any company published financials for WNBD's earlier qtrs than 3rd qtr 2010? OTC Markets data only goes back that far. Just trying to confirm your info/comments on earlier qtrs misses against actual company published financials.
Thing is, I'm pretty certain there are no company published financials for the years you declared were missed. Thanks anyway for trying. GLTY.
Hmmm.. your data seems to be missing Eric's sign-off. Let me clarify what type of data. Company published financials... Your data seems to include your opinion mostly and not actual company data.
Hmmm... Didn't we start this conversation with my inquiry for factual WNBD financials submittals for the early qtrs? My own assumption was that you may have had real data to back up your comments on the earlier qtrs. But that's Ok. I have my answer now. Best of luck in your investing also.
Again making a lot of assumptions. My trading/investing style in any stock including the profits and losses are my responsibility and no one else. In the end, we are all here to make profit, not losses. In the case of WNBD, I hold a reasonable position and am interested in accumulating more as I see confirmation of events.
Of course they were diluting. That's one way of funding a start-up company. You said they had 28 qtrs of misses. You need to have the stated goals and the financial submittals of what the is being accomplished versus what is spent in the earlier qtrs which we do not have publicly. In the beginning you have all spending because you are developing a product for sale. It seems we have good product so the earlier qtrs goals were met IMO. Obvious we have had some misses in the later qtrs and are working on recovery.
I was looking for black and white data since your statements seem to infer that there may be public data that pointed to missed goals. I was not looking for speculation. I know the history of the company. I've been here since 2006. Thanks anyway...
Loaded up on my WNBD shares already. Just waiting on the "events" now. May still pick up more though! Gaining more confidence in WNBD every day.
Didn't know that WNBD has submitted financials for 7 years.The first couple years I believe were R&D. Can you send the link to the 4 years of financials I've missed? The only ones I know of are listed on Pink Sheets. Thanks in advance...
Nice graph! I like the direction it's heading. Thanks
Hmmm... Looks like buys out numbered sells today even though it was small.
Please, no more good news. I'm still trying to pick up cheap shares. LOL...
It's all about "financials", not financing. If a tipping point can be reached to accomplish sustaining revenues then financing is not needed. 500 USA NA stores in a major chain is a start in tilting revenues in the right direction.
Your experience, as relevant as it may be, does not point to the facts of what is going on. I'm looking for actually black and white info but you are giving me your opinion. It may very well be true but it is still your speculation on what is going on with WNBD shares.
So what you are saying is that it is your speculation that it is the MMs manipulating WNBD, not fact. Thanks...
Don't you hate it when WNBD starts going up like that :)
I'm still trying to fill some cheap .0002s. Oh well. Win, win...
Hmmm... Like the buying pressure we saw going to .0004 in December and ending at .0003 for the year. Up 50% to 100% over the average (.0002) for the last 6 months.
How come you never seem to mention the 5000 share sells on other days. On average, there are more red paints than green I would bet. Either way, both are painting the tape and manipulation of the tape.
That's the consensus by some that most WNBD shareholders are down more than 90%. Somehow I don't think that's entirely accurate. My WNBD positions are looking fine...
Thanks. Appreciate the posting of the charts...
I'm sure who ever is buying the .0004s at the volume they have been today understand the status of the shares and the company. Given the risk as you've stated, seems they are pretty confident in there trades to buy that much at the pps high for the last 6 months..
Chin is up and getting higher. Games not over. We'll see what the outcome is. Turn off the lights or full expansion and flooded with cash.
Your right. Hostess failed so WNBD shouldn't even try.. LOL...
BTW, how long was Hostess in business making millions of dollars before closing?
The reason the numbers are what they are for companies is what gets spun, not the numbers themselves. You see this everyday. It boils down to the perspective the CEO wants the public to envision.
Example: "Took hit in operation costs to retool for better efficiency", reality is that their equipment is antiquated and broke so they had a large outlay to fix it to get production back up.