Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What a DUMBAZZ!!!!
yes sir, you are correct!
yes sir, you are correct!
Grip, BTW, I would NEVER look for you, as i am not that kind of person, not to mention that I have way too much to lose. Good night.
Grip, I have traded the sh1t out of this stock, until quite recently, and have done quite well. Even if my current holdings (I have long-term & short-term accounts) go to zero, I will have made significant money in my CYDY experience. I am not a greedy person, (have singled and doubled it to death) and have made money every year in CYDY (since February of 2020), including this one. I promise you that!
I know what I know about that conversation a few years back, but no, I will not spend the time pouring through your 9000 posts on LieHub. What a f.... loser....9000 posts!!!! Are you kidding me? Get a f.... life!!! I generally don't post here anymore, for a reason, and rarely ever check this site as it is a complete CESSPOOL!!!!
Grip, I have traded the sh1t out of this stock, until quite recently, and have done quite well. Even if my current holdings (I have long-term & short-term accounts) go to zero, I will have made significant money in my CYDY experience. I am not a greedy person, (have singled and doubled it to death) and have made money every year in CYDY (since February of 2020), including this one. I promise you that!
I know what I know about that conversation a few years back, but no, I will not spend the time pouring through your 9000 posts on LieHub. What a f.... loser....9000 posts!!!! Are you kidding me? Get a f.... life!!! I generally don't post here anymore, for a reason, and rarely ever check this site as it is a complete CESSPOOL!!!!
Grip, that conversation was back in 2020, btw. Your fellow bashers should go back through your history and see all of the pumping you used to do, including posting your buys. What a PIECE OF SH!T you are, and I would love to meet the likes of you in person.......it would be quite comical, I can assure you
Hey DUMBAZZ, you forget the conversation that you and I had (when you were long) about you working from your home and how you had to make some money for your kid's college. You were hoping to make that money as a CYDY long! You don't make sh1t!!! "Even pediatricians?" They are among the lowest paid physicians..
Average Doctor Annual Compensation by Specialty
Here are the top medical specialties, ranked by average income:
Plastic Surgery: $619,000
Orthopedics: $573,000
Cardiology: $507,000
Urology: $506,000
Gastroenterology: $501,000
Otolaryngology: $485,000
Radiology: $483,000
Oncology: $463,000
Anesthesiology: $448,000
Dermatology: $443,000
Surgery, General: $412,000
Critical Care: $406,000
Ophthalmology: $388,000
Pulmonary Medicine: $378,000
Emergency Medicine: $352,000
Pathology: $339,000
Ob/Gyn: $337,000
Neurology: $313,000
Nephrology: $312,000
Psychiatry: $309,000
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: $306,000
Allergy and Immunology: $282,000
Rheumatology: $281,000
Internal Medicine: $273,000
Diabetes and Endocrinology: $267,000
Infectious Diseases: $262,000
Family Medicine: $255,000
Pediatrics: $251,000
Public Health and Preventative Medicine: $249,000
Hey DUMBAZZ, you forget the conversation that you and I had (when you were long) about you working from your home and how you had to make some money for your kid's college. You were hoping to make that money as a CYDY long! You don't make sh1t!!! "Even pediatricians?" They are among the lowest paid physicians..
Average Doctor Annual Compensation by Specialty
Here are the top medical specialties, ranked by average income:
Plastic Surgery: $619,000
Orthopedics: $573,000
Cardiology: $507,000
Urology: $506,000
Gastroenterology: $501,000
Otolaryngology: $485,000
Radiology: $483,000
Oncology: $463,000
Anesthesiology: $448,000
Dermatology: $443,000
Surgery, General: $412,000
Critical Care: $406,000
Ophthalmology: $388,000
Pulmonary Medicine: $378,000
Emergency Medicine: $352,000
Pathology: $339,000
Ob/Gyn: $337,000
Neurology: $313,000
Nephrology: $312,000
Psychiatry: $309,000
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: $306,000
Allergy and Immunology: $282,000
Rheumatology: $281,000
Internal Medicine: $273,000
Diabetes and Endocrinology: $267,000
Infectious Diseases: $262,000
Family Medicine: $255,000
Pediatrics: $251,000
Public Health and Preventative Medicine: $249,000
Misiu, don't let any of these dumbazzes bring you down over a misspelled word while hastily messaging. We all do it from time to time. NONE of these bashers have any letters behind their names, have earned the achievements that you have, or maintain the integrity that you do. On top of that, back when you were working as a physician, you were making more money in one hour than they earn all day, perhaps even in two days. They are all just a bunch of losers who have sold their souls to eke out a meager living. Stay strong!💪💪💪💪
That's your own stupidity, but wait, you are probably part of the "no personal responsibility" generation (sub 40ish)? Let me take a guess, you are looking for some student loan forgiveness, too?
🤣🤣🤣🤣I'm glad that you agree with me. Yes, the stock has sucked, no doubt about that. It is the molecule that I care more about, as it is legit. It's just a matter of time until LL emerges from the clutches of the FDA and the BP controllers of the FDA.
God, you are a dumbass! Some things just never change. That's why I left this P.O.S. message board 2 years ago.
dj, you don't know what you don't know. I just felt like lobbing a few grenades at you dumbasses and leaving to go back to enjoying my day. Your only incentive here is to post and instigate more posts in return. In a war of words, my friend, I am afraid that you are merely armed with a flintlock musket!🤣🤣🤣🤣
the company stock performance and the positive attributes associated with the molecule LL are two entirely separate discussions
AND, if you were on death's door from covid, and was able to access LL early on for "emergency use," as a result of her educating you all from the medical side, you would most likely be around today to read the never-ending b.s. spewed from the mouths of the uneducated detractors, which appear to dominate the cesspool we call LieHub.
You ALL should be listening to Misiu as she is the smartest person here!!!!!
Thank you, misiu, stay strong and safe!!!
misiu, I am aware of securing bond, and am not afraid of BK as they wouldn't have done that if BK was in the cards. I just fear the tremendous corruption, and overcoming those forces. I know that the molecule is outstanding! Unfortunately, so do they!
misiu, I agree with you on all counts. I am also afraid of the long reach of the U.S. influence. Why isn't the PH farther along, as long as LL has been there, why aren't the Brazilian trials farther along, etc., etc., etc.?????????
misiu, TY, and of course all that have been around a while know all of this, that's why the lack of traction is very troubling, and why I am not sure that the inertia can be overcome....
????????we could use it
it IS an unusual time, is it not? During market hours
Nader should put his ego in check and step aside. He should swallow his $100 minimum pps rhetoric, and invite all BP to make offers (not in that fashion, but make it known in the Pharma industry that the company will consider all "reasonable offers"). Sell this molecule to an entity that can actually get it to market, and everybody wins. There is plenty of potential value with all of the likely indications to fetch a decent return.
Did you even watch last night's Zoom meeting? Are you open-minded, whatsoever, to consider other ways/means of making LL a success? I am. I used to be a Nader advocate, but he has played the same hand over and over.....it is a bad hand. Sometimes you need to know when to fold 'em!
This wasn't another paid company advertisement, this was a presentation by the proposed board member group looking to oust Nader.
This was the anti-Nader show, which I have been a strong advocate of for quite a while. He was very valuable early in this company's infancy, but history has shown that he has long since been operating way "above his pay grade." Sorry, but I am a credentials guy, and he has none, nor does he has any biz experience in this genre. I believe that he means well, and works his butt off, but unfortunately, at this level, there are no "participation trophies."
idk if that can be replayed or not, but if it can I would urge all to be OPEN-MINDED and hear out the presentation. No further discussions of acquiring/merging with IncellDx, indepth analysis of the toxic financing when dealing with Fife, keeping all employees other than Nader, an actual plan by people that have "been there, done that." I'm sorry, but Nader is a Mechanical Engineer by trade, he has zero experience taking this company/molecule to the "promised land." HOPE is not a plan!!!!!
Cyn, Nader's record speaks for itself. He consistently over promises and under delivers. What Einstein's definition of insanity? "Doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result." Anyone that would have participated in last night's Zoom meeting would have seen the clear difference in the competency that is available to us. This is a no brainer!!!
Chuckles, I am with you 100% on that one!!!!! All bloodsuckers in one form or another.....
What's up today as I have been disconnected?
You are missing my point. I am not arguing about resubmitting the HIV BLA, I am only pointing out that you are "data mining," yourself, when you state what you did when trying to make your point. When you do that you cheapen your argument, even though we are in agreement about how incompetent NP, and co. are.
Didn't you suggest that I was "data mining," earlier? Talk about data mining, "38 Of the 53 that were resubmitted were approved," so stating that 38 of 98 RTFs getting approved is misleading. Obviously, they must get resubmitted to have a chance of approval (38/53 were approved).
BTW, don't mistake my belief in the eventual success of LL with that of support for the company or it's management. The company's management is a train wreck, at best, but the asset is far too valuable for CYDY to go bankrupt, and so I believe that ongoing funding will come from somewhere, but I don't necessarily believe that NP and his merry men will be at the helm when approval does eventually occur.
I will enjoy calling you, and several others, out once this all plays out. The molecule LL will prove to be an extremely valuable asset, at the end of the day. Not defending the company and it's activities.
3X:
Of the 98 applications, 54.1% (53 [47 NDAs and 6 efficacy supplements]) had been resubmitted after the RTF letters were received and the FDA’s refusal reasons were potentially addressed. The median time to resubmission after RTF letters was 182 days (interquartile range [IQR], 100-460 days), with 16 applications taking more than 1 year to resubmit. Of the 53 that were resubmitted, 71.7% (38 [34 NDAs and 4 efficacy supplements]) were approved at time of analysis within a median of 784 days (IQR, 529-1283 days) from the original submission date; approval of 21 applications took more than 2 years. This approval time includes all intermediate regulatory steps, including the time applicants took to address the RTF letter and potential multiple review cycles after FDA nonapproval. Four of 53 applications had been withdrawn and 3 received another RTF letter. Applicants withdrew 6 applications after receiving RTF letters without resubmitting.
Ladies and Gentleman, Start Your Engines...https://ssl4.eir-parts.net/doc/4593/tdnet/2010473/00.pdf
O.T.: One to Consider (ATHX): https://ssl4.eir-parts.net/doc/4593/tdnet/2010473/00.pdf
Lawman, EXACTLY!!!! What's Einstein's definition of insanity, "Doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result." Nader is "acting" in a position that is WAY beyond his pay grade. He did a reasonable job early on in this company's infancy, but has been incompetent in his current role for quite some time. As I preach myself, ALWAYS use professionals! IMO, you shouldn't act as your own investment advisor, surgeon, lawyer, etc., w/o the formal credentials supporting. Nader is a M.E. by trade, and I will leave it at that. Stick to what you know, and know what you don's know. End of story!!!!
i have 1st hand information that it would have