This might also have something to do with it.

https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/207884/SEC-Charges-Audit-Firm-BF-Borgers-and-Its-Owner-with-Massive-Fraud-Affecting-More-Than-1500-SEC-Filings

What a disaster everything Sharp touches turns into.

The briefs have already been filed and I don't think new evidence can be submitted for the appeal at this point but I'm not sure if Calasse can use this new info about BF Borgers to his advantage somehow (another lawsuit?)

What a shyster Sharp turned out to be.

This will go back to Expert Market. No need to file while the court action goes on for the next 5 years. Another Hilo failure here lol

Sharp playing it smart. Drop the price so this can be frontloaded again in Canada.

This will soon be cheaper than GVSI 😆 🤣 😂

I'll give you that... There is no dilution for GVSI and WNFT (provided he hands over the preferred shares to a merging company eventually). The only one he issued excessive shares from is SRNW ($1.5M for CEO services).

But all costs for keeping the companies fully reporting is paid by the company and listed in the annual report. Sharp himself is out nothing, the companies reimburse him via stock or it is treated as a loan.

And I guarantee you he has made $500k+ by selling his common shares for GVSI and WNFT. He's definitely not in the red, even if he personally paid for all accounting expenses.

That's not spin, my friend.

The US court of appeals is a completely different court than the NVSC, and therefore any statistics from the US court of appeals is completely meaningless and irrelevant to a case handled exclusively by the NVSC.

In addition to the difference between federal court and state court, the Nevada judicial system is set up so that every appeal is heard by the NVSC (or a subpanel of judges for minor cases).

You sort of short your foot off when you tried to cite to the US court of appeals without realizing why it is ridiculous.

But Sharp said the otc audit would be $40k!!!!

/s

I'm not happy about it, nor should anyone be. I'm just glad I'm no longer a shareholder.

And you are right, I have no inside knowledge of what GS had or did not have. But we have enough evidence to make some very inferences, which are not favorable to him.


Faced with losing an actual merger candidate, much less a big one, any businessman would find a way to settle the lawsuit with Calasse and move on.

Since Sharp didn't settle and lost the merger candidate, logically either he never had a merger candidate and/or he's a lousy businessman.

Sharp filed a Form 15 to deregister GOFF/WNFT stock and cease all SEC filing Obligations.

"That is, no dilution, and that GOFF/WNFT has been SEC reporting since late 2021"

Sharp gifted himself enough stock and he failed to file a Form 3 or 4 for WNFT for the stock he gifted himself. That is probably the reason he filed the form 15.

IG

Sharp has had over 5 years to find a company for FORW - Sharp brought two companies and both were scams.

I have followed Sharp for many years and he has never operated a successful business.

Sharp naming himself the OTC whiz/guardian...

But he hijacked 3 dormant tickers and they all have problems - so it is obvious that Sharp isn't smart enough to vet a OTC company.

But we have two other examples - Ligand and Maverick - both were scams Surf immediately called out Ligand as a scam and I immediately told everyone that Maverick was a scam.

But the OTC Whiz thought they were real companies. That proves that Sharp isn't very bright or a serial scammer or both.

Don't be the last to get the memo that you have been duped.

IG

But George is the OTC WHIZZ. SMH

What's so difficult to believe about that?

For example, a common argument that I hear is: "Sharp hasn't gotten a deal done in almost 3 years for his tickers."

I would argue that just as important as completing a deal is, it's also important to complete the right type of deal, and under the right type of market conditions. You don't just "drop any sort of old deal" into the ticker and hope that it pays off.

Instead, you diligently seek out the best deal for shareholders, and audit companies to ensure they are not only compliant with securities regulations, but additionally would be a deal that would potentially be favorable for all stakeholders, insiders, directors. etc.

That said, if you're looking at this in terms of believing that all of Sharps tickers are scams, then you might as well just sell and move on. There's no point in convincing you otherwise, you move on and find another investment.

I'm still here because I believe Sharp has every intention of benefiting shareholders in the right time, and perhaps I am alone in that belief, or close to it. No worries, and best of luck to you.

Once people become married to a stock/CEO - they put blinders on and ignore the facts. And resort to posting more nonsense to defend Sharp.

Let's discuss the facts then. Last I checked, there is ZERO dilution or intentional share issuances with the sole purpose of benefiting the CEO of the company, which is George Sharp. You can go back to the same terms and arguments you always use, but it doesn't change the facts.

That is, no dilution, and that GOFF/WNFT has been SEC reporting since late 2021, and tradable with all major brokers which allow the trading of OTC stocks. None of this would be possible without Sharp taking over the stock. Would you rather have a dead ticker that is not tradable with brokers whatsoever?

First what has Sharp accomplished that is so much greater than Rosen.

Rosen does deals that are highly toxic and dilutive to shareholders. Now you could argue that HMBL/TSNP was also highly toxic and dilutive, and fair enough. That management team is such a $hit show, no wonder Sharp decided to distance himself from them.

Sharp gave them a brand new vehicle, and they wrecked it with toxic debt and dilution, much like Rosen does with his deals. But before that happened, the stock made international headlines and traded $100's of millions in dollar volume for months. Just saying.

Since Sharp has taken over his shells, (and these are facts that you simply cannot deny unless you have your "blinders on"), his tickers have CANCELLED shares and the share structure has IMPROVED.

Sharp pumped all 3 hijacked dormant/zombie shells - the true believers started buying and buying as you were enriching Sharp.

What's your definition of "hijacked? A legitimate custodianship through the Nevada court system, which plenty of others have done as well? Are you saying every single person who files a custodianship petition has bad intentions and is simply out to get shareholders?

This part is complete lunacy - "but I truly believe Sharp is acting in the best fiduciary duty to shareholders" - no one could possibly believe that - Sharp has been the CEO of FORW for over 5 years and he has brought in two scams and in 3 years Sharp has dangled the carrot about mergers - companies lined up begging to work with Sharp and his worthless shells.

Then I stand alone, and that's fine. Do you even know what the definition of fiduciary duty is? It is not about "getting a deal done for the sake of it." Instead, it's about "acting in a manner that is beyond conflict of interest or other issues that would conflict with the shareholders of a corporation, and ultimately doing what is in the best interest of all stakeholders."

Now, that is a broad definition, and up to interoperation, but the point is, if Sharp was so hell bent on diluting shareholders and causing chaos, he would have done so already. Your argument is that Sharp has the malicious intent of scamming shareholders, when everything has been completely legit and done by the book. Just ask the Securities & Exchange commission what it means to be fully reporting.

Ask the Nevada court system what it means to petition for custodianship of a publicly traded corporation. Just because you throw around fancy terms such as "hijacking" and "scam" it doesn't mean anything.

That isn't Sharp was acting in the best interest of shareholders - and Sharp failed miserably when he neglected his fiduciary responsibilities.

If Sharp intentionally diluted shareholders here with WNFT or SRNW for example, and walked away from the tickers and it was provable that he didn't have any intention of ever completing a successful deal, then there may be cause to believe that perhaps Sharp acted maliciously or without the best interest of shareholders. However, your points, as always, are not grounded in reality or fact, even though you believe that they are.

I truly believe Sharp is acting in the best fiduciary duty to shareholders.

The share holders should go to the Derby Saturday and ask Sharp how he grew his stable to over 100 horses while his shell scams screwed investors! LOLOL>

It costs very little - in listing on nasdaq our audited Financials cost $350,000 to be fully Sarbanes-Oxley compliant.

Audited Financials for the OTC are easy as the company provides the Financials to the auditor and basically makes sure the Balance Sheet balances.

You can attempt to make all of the excuses for Sharp but his actions are indefensible.

There will never be a real company that will do a reverse merger with WNFT.

But you have tried your best to pump the Sharp garage.

IG

Mini fire 🔥 sale??

What are you talking about? Where’s the dilution? Do you know how much it costs to keep these tickers fully reporting? I would bet Sharp is in the red on these tickers, even if we assume he dumped his GVSI shares at .02 or whatever.

Of course he didn't acquire all these shell scams for nothing.

They pay him well to do nothing.

Once people become married to a stock/CEO - they put blinders on and ignore the facts. And resort to posting more nonsense to defend Sharp.

"I’m not saying Sharp is walking on water, but he has done fantastic in terms of not diluting shareholders, and even successfully cancelled shares across the board for his stocks...

That said, thank GOD this is not a Brett Rosen shit show, where deals are financed with toxic, dilutive debt that destroys the capitalization structure and ultimately shareholders.

This may be a far fetched opinion at this point, but I truly believe Sharp is acting in the best fiduciary duty to shareholders, and is trying to seek out the best deals, at the right time, for investors."

First what has Sharp accomplished that is so much greater than Rosen.

Sharp pumped all 3 hijacked dormant/zombie shells - the true believers started buying and buying as you were enriching Sharp.

This part is complete lunacy - "but I truly believe Sharp is acting in the best fiduciary duty to shareholders" - no one could possibly believe that - Sharp has been the CEO of FORW for over 5 years and he has brought in two scams and in 3 years Sharp has dangled the carrot about mergers - companies lined up begging to work with Sharp and his worthless shells.

That isn't Sharp was acting in the best interest of shareholders - and Sharp failed miserably when he neglected his fiduciary responsibilities.

IG

I agree with you We need patience with GS WNFT and GVSI He is working hard for clean Merger

Fair enough. Everyone has their opinions, and who can blame shareholders for throwing in the towel.

After all, it’s been coming up on 3 years for GOFF/WNFT and even longer for GVSI. I guess the difference for me anyway, is that I bought fairly low initially for Goff, and I still believe Sharp has every intention of completing a deal.

What comes out of that is anyone’s guess, and it is definitely a volatile, risky endeavor. But I suppose I’m one of the few here from 2021 who still believes that Sharp didn’t do all of this for nothing.

And I do agree with your stance that GVSI has major issues it has been trying to work through, and I feel like you have done a pretty good job of documenting the paper trail in terms of the shit show from previous management and finra/sec issues.

That said, I believe GVSI may present an opportunity in terms of the current price, much as you believe Wnft may present an opportunity with the current price and what could happen with the court decision. Best of luck to you.

Based upon the volume, it looks like it was a nothing burger Doc. Just someone who bought a bunch of shares without there being available liquidity, hence briefly pushing the price above .01.

I must admit, when I saw the price action this morning, I almost immediately checked the Nevada Supreme Court website.

Up 83% today? Someone knows something!

I’m not saying Sharp is walking on water, but he has done fantastic in terms of not diluting shareholders, and even successfully cancelled shares across the board for his stocks.

The point is, Sharp is the majority shareholder and until that changes, he has a ton of flexibility in terms of issuing shares, and could have dumped on shareholders by now if he wanted.

That said, thank GOD this is not a Brett Rosen shit show, where deals are financed with toxic, dilutive debt that destroys the capitalization structure and ultimately shareholders.

This may be a far fetched opinion at this point, but I truly believe Sharp is acting in the best fiduciary duty to shareholders, and is trying to seek out the best deals, at the right time, for investors.

I have never seen a real company file a Form 15 to deregister their stock and to Cease all SEC filing obligations. This nonsense is only done by OTC scams.

One problem with GOFF/WNFT is that Sharp never filed a 15c.

And a OTC audit isn't that expensive. There is absolutely no legitimate reason for Sharp to file a Form 15.

The funny part is that it doesn't matter what Sharp does to shareholders you will always defend him.

IG

You’re not the one paying the bill either. And it doesn’t make any sense for Sharp to first spend tons of his own money for sec reporting if he had no intention of completing a deal with SEC reporting status.

The good news with Wnft unlike gvsi, is that there is absolutely no reason for the SEC to non allow WNFT to become SEC reporting, given that they have already approved the previous application in 2021.

As always, your theories are not based in reality or fact, and instead Sharp and his scamming of shareholders is the scapegoat for everything. If Sharp was so bent on scamming shareholders, he had every opportunity to issue a ton of new shares and dump them on the market when the stock price was high for GOFF and SRNW.

If Sharp was trying to build a real company he would never have allowed the Calasse lawsuit to get in the way of a deal - no competent CEO would have found a way to make it work.

One time - I tried to buy a business that our company needed but the person refused to sale. So I offered his employees double what they were making - and the owner called me to accept the deal - and I told him I had already withdrawn that offer and bought his company for about half of what I originally offered. As a CEO you have fires to put out everyday. Sharp folded up like a cheap suit.

There was never a real company lined up to do a reverse merger.

IG

The cult mentality is still strong - now the defense of Sharp for deregistering the stock.

Do you have any idea how many times I have seen these OTC scams file a Form 15 - and use the excuse that is For saving money - and the cult posts the same nonsense.

So you believe filing another registration statement is cheaper than paying for a yearly OTC audit.

WNFT might end up like GVSI and FINRA won't process any Corporate Actions.

"Good it's a waste of money. there is nothing to report until the court ends the Calais business and then we have a merger."

It is Calasse and the NVSC decision has never had any effect on the success or failure of GOFF/WNFT - Sharp never had a company lined up for a merger.

IG

Since Sharp filed a Form 15 to deregister the WNFT stock and Cease all SEC reporting obligations.

So the Calasse lawsuit outcome is Moot - there certainly isn't any real companies that is going to do any kind of merger with WNFT.

You can post about Calasse but the facts are Sharp screwed over shareholders and especially the true believers/pumpers like you.

But you will still attempt to defend Sharp but after filing a Form 15 there isn't a defense.

I was 100% accurate from the beginning GOFF/WNFT was just another OTC scam.

IG

And you're very happy about this? You also have no clue what GS had or did not have.

All I see here is a wasted opportunity for an IPO.

Sharp gets nothing. Any shareholders that held get nothing.

It wasn't worth it and could have been easily avoided two years ago. But here we all are, victim of Sharp's mismanagement. With an assist from Calasse, but Sharp didn't have any mergers to begin with.

Smart business.. imo, glta

Enjoy!

I feel like we have to be closer instead of further to a decision at this point, but who knows. The Nevada SC seems like they're a bunch of monkeys running around shuffling papers between each other, until someone stamps it with a banana republic approval.

The show goes on! (some famous words from Belfort)

Back to OTC markets reporting I suppose. With our luck the form 15 will get approved by the SEC right when the calasse decision drops lol

Hello, 2026... This nonsense will not get settle for another year, at the very least. In the meantime enjoy the 'barcoding'.

Did court rule?

Looks like WC now gets nothing. Was it worth it?

AMAZING DAY! THANK YOU GEORGE! THANK YOU FOR PLOWING OUT THE MENTALLY CHALLENGED!

Good it's a waste of money. there is nothing to report until the court ends the Calais business and then we have a merger.

On the shelf until 2025 or 2026...

WNFT has filed a Form 15 with the SEC in order to halt reporting obligations. The company will now file its disclosures with OTC Markets until such time as the company is ready to be an SEC reporter again. This ends the need to audit the company's books at a cost of $40K/year.

You keep saying things like this: