Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Doesn't matter if u have shares or not, the fact is that u told u will buy next day but actually didn't. This sounds like fraudulent stock manipulation
Stupidest thing I've yet to hear lol, I have plenty of shares pal. What am I supposed to do buy 5 billion........GET A CLUE!!!
Once a liar always a liar
Why didn't you buy more shares when you said you would?
Your right the CEO already did the harm.
I blame him
Fear monger all you want it wont work.
Did the tide turn for Xaviers other company MDCN?
No it did not.
Therefore your theory is 💯 wrong
The Tide Will Turn, Always Does $$$
You can't make this run buddy go ahead and try 🙄
The damage has been done.
Xavier is a criminal 💯 as stated on the Financials.
And all credibility was lost when he announced a "significant" buyback then went onto a cancelation of only 100m
Xavier Mitchell and Providence Films are not named in the federal criminal complaint. But Sous Chef claims in its 2013 filing that Tier One International and Penny Bid were holding the funds that Mitchell allegedly transferred out of the escrow account.
During the hearing in the downtown courtroom, Lastowski told Judge Duffy-Lewis that a settlement had been reached with some of the defendants.
In a telephone interview after the hearing, Lastowski said he could not comment on pending litigation. When asked to clarify which parties to the lawsuit had settled, the attorney cut the interview short.
The judge stayed the case and scheduled a status conference for July 9.
https://www.courthousenews.com/chef-fraud-tied-to-federal-criminal-probe/
If you read it why can't you post the part you talk about?
You already outed yourself telling others your buying shares tomorrow but then not actually buying.
What run? It has only been running to a no bid. Can't see any other run
He was never arrested nor charged with a crime. Others were. Post the end of the article, I read that same article last night on my cell phone before I fell asleep. You can't stop this from running buddy, go ahead and try!!!
In Fact look at the Financials.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
Legal/Disciplinary History
A. Identify whether any of the persons or entities listed above have, in the past 10 years, been the subject of:
1. A conviction in a criminal proceeding or named as a defendant in a pending criminal proceeding (excluding
traffic violations and other minor offenses);
Yes
Looks like you're the one falsifying facts.
Yes Xavier was brought up on charges.
The court cases are public information that anyone can access
🤣🤣🤣
It's all public information that I posted.
Here's the court case since you're to dimwitted to look.
https://unicourt.com/case/ca-la2-sous-chef-llc-vs-xavier-mitchell-et-al-63367
You already got caught saying you're buying more shares tomorrow when you never did.
Big time defamation here, I wouldn’t be surprised if he sued.
I hope Xavier is reading this board, actually I know he does as he alluded to on X. Falsifying facts can get folks in a world of trouble. Xavier was never brought up on charges.
They always use a negative slant in everything they bring up.
Why are you leaving parts out of that article lol, because I read it and at the end it states Xavier was never brought up on charges lol! Such BS!!!
You are still repeating the same old BS lies when this was moving in 2022. You don’t know the future and you can’t prevent this from running so go bash another board.
You might want to Google the CEOs name because he's been sued left and right. I didn't even know this until Hippy mentioned it. I thought he's just a liar and taking people's money for his own good .
Sho me the money.
Cannot. X is spending it.
Holy crap! I feel disgusted. I am right all along. I always give any CEO a second chance but not for the third time, forth, fifth, etc. especially this one. This CEO is beyond the norm and he's obviously hopeless. He got so many chances to prove the naysayers but he is getting worse.
That's just the tip of the iceberg.
Look at all the alias he uses.
His birth date was listed as 1971-09-29. His age is 51. You may also know he as Xavier E Mitchell, Xavier Edwardo Mitchell, Xavier Louis Mitchell, Xvaier Mitchell, Xavies Mitchell, Xavier L Mitchell, X E Mitchell, Xaviere Mitchell, Mr Mitchell Xavier, Mr Xavier Edwardo Mitchell, Mr Xavier E Mitchell, Mr Xavier E Mitchel, Mr Yavier Mitchell, Mr Javier E Mitchelle, Mr Xavier S Mitchell, Mr Xaiver Mitchell. The
Wow, i didn't even know this CEOs has so many lawsuits. That's unbelievable.
You wait until you lose all your money, then you will empathy to them.
Disgusting! I didn't even know this one happened and this makes it even worse. You can never trust anyone who believe he's entitled to a handout at people's expense. He's actually using investors money to pay his personal bills. How could he even afford to live knowing this company doesnt have any revenue? Anyone who has half the brain knows the answer to that.
.
Even BottomPenny is getting angry with the company now.
"Where is the "significant" cancellation? If its not over 2-3 billion don't waste the time or effort because it won't move the needle!!!"
Remember Penny you put your reputation on the line. It's not looking good for you now.
You know you’re going to say more. This board is the only way you stay relevant in your life. Why don’t you go to your local college and protest with the rest of the losers.
The development comes after Sous Chef Llc., a subsidiary of Aldamisa Entertainment, filed a fraud lawsuit against Providence earlier in the week.
According to the complaint that was lodged in L.A. Superior Court, Sous Chef and Providence entered into an agreement together where each was to contribute $3 million to the production of Chef, for a total of $6 million.
Sous Chef had already put up $2.5 million by that time, leaving the company with another $500,000 to go to meet its commitment. On July 10, Sous Chef says it agreed to advance Providence $200,000, reducing the amount it would contribute to the escrow to $2.8 million.
“The parties agreed the ‘production funds’ would be placed in an escrow account and would be distributed to an ‘account of Sous Chef’ to fund the production,” says the lawsuit. “The parties agreed that the funds would not be distributed from the escrow account until both parties passed ‘compliance’ with Rabobank, the bank processing the wire transfers, and Chicago Title received confirmation of ‘compliance.'”
An attorney for Providence (who hasn’t responded to a request for comment) is said to have e-mailed “a purported confirmation of a wire transfer of $2,800,000 to the Escrow Account” on July 10, but what Sous Chef didn’t know at the time was that the money never showed up.
Mitchell then instructed an escrowee agent to transfer $297,175 from the escrow account into two other accounts, “neither of which was the Production Account or an account controlled by Sous Chef,” says the lawsuit.
"The complaint also speaks about some other unrelated lawsuit happening, where Mitchell allegedly “orchestrated a fraud that resulted in an escrow officer wiring $500,000 to Mitchell’s account. As part of the fraud, Mitchell arranged to have an imposter pose as a 93-year-old man (who was hospitalized at the time) and sign escrow.”
That's only one example of the Conmans antics
Wait till the class action lawsuit pops up against Xavier for posting misleading information to manipulate new investors
Yes. Slander and defamation wouldn't happen if the CEO didn't use misleading tweets. We all know he misled with the word significant
No it's actually the truth.
Google Xavier Mitchell Fraud on Google and you will learn
So the CEO of SONG is trying to sue 350 anonymous forum users for a total of $1m
So $2857 per user....
LMFAO
You bashers repeatedly saying that the CEO is a serial liar, a con man and a fraudster is begging for legal consequences.
didn't do anything nothing moves this pos
🤣🤣🤣
Good luck on that.
Give us an example where they actually received 6 figure sums.
Your making stuff up if you can't prove it.
Disinformation?
You're grasping at straws.
You actually think that lawsuit is going to go through against 350 unanimous forum members?
You realize you still need a retainer for an attorney. And if you don't win the lawsuits you're stuck paying the hefty lawyers fees.
Something Xavier don't have is funds.
After all he just went through bankruptcy just last fall.
This can all be avoided by knowing the true definition of "significant"
Indeed - the specialist attorneys for defamation are getting $6-figure sums these days from each defendant for punitive damages.
It has been suggested to the $PSRU CEO that this would be a lucrative additional line of revenue since there is ample evidence on all the usual suspects!
Attorneys will take on the cases which are self-evident wins since the defendants get ordered to pay all the attorney fees and court costs.
Companies are fighting back more so today they are tired of being slandered and I don’t blame them. It causes significant financial hardships on businesses and their investors. These guys won’t be laughing when they get hit with a lawsuit.
Clearly he and the other usual suspects posting disinformation and defamation nonsense didn't pay attention to the warning!
CEO of a 2nd company has now filed a defamation lawsuit against primarily iHub bashers for "wrongful, malicious, false and defamatory statements".
It has been "requested that this Court enter judgement in their favor and against Defendant, enjoining Defendants from continuing to harass and cyberstalk Plaintiffs and from making further defamatory statements against them, and awarding Plaintiffs their damages, including special, punitive damages, incidental damages, consequential damages, attorneys' fees and costs incurred in attempting to correct Defendants' defamatory statements, and such other relief as the Court deems just and proper."
The Court has commanded iHub owners to disclose the personal details of 29 bashers and 'X' to disclose a further 5!
CASE NO. #: 11-2024-CA-000814-0001-XX
— Pro Music Rights (@ProMusicRights) April 19, 2024
JAKE P. NOCH.
A Florida Resident, and
Music Licensing Inc. (OTC: $SONG)
A Nevada Corporation
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN DOE, et al., pic.twitter.com/9AUYYKdTjS
Followers
|
363
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
24
|
Posts (Total)
|
30373
|
Created
|
12/15/10
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators WorkinGreen Top Penny BLULLISH AJH92 Chartmaster Lime Time |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |