Unless we want to go the silly Wells Notice route. I'd find it hysterical for finra to green light the change and then an SEC Wells notice to follow. lol.

Like I've said many times. How would a name/ticker CUSIP change effect any current SEC investigation? It doesn't. And since the SEC would not want to tip their hat as to any possible pending actions, "approving" the changes as you call it really has no bearing on anything at all now does it?

The most important thing here is transparency which this company still has none. Where are financials after 11 months? You do know companies file them quarterly right? So, even in the absence of "previous" financials this company could be supplying reports for current periods. They could also provide corporate details/disclosures but they don't do that either.

Seriously, your arguements completely show their lack of addressing the "sole" reason you believe they were suspended for. How has PIPI addressed the issue you seem to believe is the reason behind their suspension? You downplay the suspension yet you do not address their inability to address the issues that got them suspended in the first place which is a total lack of professionalism on the part of management. How will they become profitable miners when after 11 months they can't clear up a simple regulatory issue Space?

oh not at all cyber. Completely untrue. Otc offers 7 explanations for the warning. Based on the FACT that the sec defined the suspension as a "lack of adequate and accurate public info, (ONLY)" and the FACT that Finra APPROVED a name /ticker change (where we know that the sec needed some questions answered) points me to a #5. #5 fits the bill beautifully to the farewell to Medlink and Anywhere Md and the new Mining Sector for the New Entity "Premier" (Finra approved ticker PIPI) PS, if there was fraud here, you would have NEVER seen a name/ticker change. Unless we want to go the silly Wells Notice route. I'd find it hysterical for finra to green light the change and then an SEC Wells notice to follow. lol.

1. Questionable Promotion — The security is being promoted to the public, but adequate current information about the issuer has not been made available to the public.
2. Spam — The security is the subject of spam promotion having the effect of encouraging trading of the issuer's securities.
3. Investigation of Fraud — There is a known investigation of fraudulent activity involving the company, its securities or insiders.
4. Suspension/Halt — A Regulatory Authority has halted or suspended trading for public interest concerns (i.e. not a news or earning halt).
5. Disruptive Corporate Actions — The security or issuer is the subject of corporate actions, such as reverse mergers or serial stocks splits and name changes, without adequate current information being publicly available.
6. Unsolicited Quotes — The security has only been quoted on an unsolicited basis since it entered the public markets and the issuer has not made adequate current information available to the public.
7. Other Public Interest Concern — There is, in OTC Markets' view, a public interest concern.

Complementary perhaps, not synonymous.

Both statuses have their own distinct definitions, and associated warnings. Otherwise, both statuses wouldn't need to independently exist and be called out. We could just group the under one designation, like: FRAUD Don't Buy.

Hey! Not a bad idea

Let's reorganize: EVERY SINGLE sec related suspension results in grey status with caveat emptor. Does it not? If (because I wont dare say "when") this trades again on pink, does the "caveat emptor" bs not disappear magically? So, let's sum up with "synonymous" my friend!

RE: "Caveat Emptor and Grey Market are 2 separate designations"

"What do you mean? An SEC-suspended, grey market, caveat emptor, empty penny shell writing sloppy fraudulent PRs isn't the #1 Gold Mine in Pennylandia? How can that be??"

what was the question? About a fictitious place to make money? What's there to answer?

Caveat Emptor and Grey Market are 2 separate designations that PIPI has the honor to wear. I didn't make them up, or confuse their relevance, as your IR seems to have with the OTC tiers. Wear them with pride!


Grey Market
There are no market makers in this security. It is not listed, traded or quoted on any U.S. stock exchange or the OTC Markets. Trades in grey market stocks are reported by broker-dealers to their Self Regulatory Organization (SRO) and the SRO distributes the trade data to market data vendors and financial websites so investors can track price and volume. Since grey market securities are not traded or quoted on an exchange or interdealer quotation system, investor's bids and offers are not collected in a central spot so market transparency is diminished and Best Execution of orders is difficult.



Caveat Emptor
Buyer Beware. There is a public interest concern associated with the company, which may include a spam campaign, questionable stock promotion, known investigation of fraudulent activity committed by the company or insiders, regulatory suspensions, or disruptive corporate actions. During the time it is labeled Caveat Emptor, any stock that is not in the Current Information category will also have its quotes blocked on www.otcmarkets.com.

you didnt answer the question!

oh put it in check. It was a pink shell suspended during transition for transparency reasons. I love this synonymous "caveat emptor" jazz that is played on a grey sheet. we already know that the sec had no issues with finra approving a name and ticker change. It is no longer a shell owned by Medlink. I love to visit yesterday too! Here you go. Here's your suspension definition: Disruptive Corporate Actions — The security or issuer is the subject of corporate actions, such as reverse mergers or serial stocks splits and name changes, without adequate current information being publicly available.

RE: "What do you mean? An SEC-suspended, grey market, caveat emptor, empty penny shell writing sloppy fraudulent PRs isn't the #1 Gold Mine in Pennylandia? How can that be??"

it has to be and if its not...........DISCLAIMER!!!!!!!

What do you mean? An SEC-suspended, grey market, caveat emptor, empty penny shell writing sloppy fraudulent PRs isn't the #1 Gold Mine in Pennylandia? How can that be??

I like the sound of that!

Dont they have to actually close the RM deal first, or did I miss that post? Not likely to go crazy with no company and the only announcements coming from either a chat site or calling Ken.

oh please. its so far from that its insane.

How about the "No dilution ever" myth?

Oh, and if SCG owns over 51% of the outstanding stock it's the 49% of the remaining who will fund this. SCG is trying to make money back on this deal not sink more in.

Or, perhaps Ken would like to come tell everybody how much of these shares he and the other largest holders will be buying?

This is the best gold opportunity in pinky land.

LOL!!!!!!!!

It's the same old tired penny stock mining ploy. Gonna try and raise $500,000 from the sucker pool. That money will be in the same hands as the ones who seemed to think this dirty shell was a legitimate vehicle. The same ones who mismanaged this into a SEC suspension and the same ones who have released no financials and provided no transparency.

A definitive agreement doesn't mean much at all, every penny stock enters into one of those or a MOU/LOI. It's SOP here.

I'm real curious about financials. They release none, then ask for $500,000 from current investors. Oh well, at least it's the current pool that gets fleeced again and not new investors.

There is so much information in the last few PR's. Much more than people understand. We have financing, terms, a mine with thousands of ounces of proven reserves, a technical managment team, and I understand we are close to being approved by the proper agencies under BLM as well. There are numbers to call, geologist reports, people to talk to to confirm things - pretty much as transparent as you can get.

This is the best gold opportunity in pinky land. Crazy good. I expect the share price to go nuts soon.

and if permits are really complete, WOW are they making some accomplishment! "Pete" included. lol

RE: "they are doing a multimillion dollar mining deal for pete's sake"

No this is not primary school,they are doing a multimillion dollar mining deal for pete's sake...

Need to crawl before you can learn to walk.

I wonder the potential MM that may file the 211 thinks of these very poor News statements.
Does the fact that no American news service will run their stories concern them as well?

You know for a fact they do? Show me the money.

If they do have the millions (yes, it takes millions) necessary, then why the hokey financing deal to soak the longs for another $500K (or is it $5k?)?

I'd hold on to your "take" on the subject for now. Weren't you the one who suggested that finra was prompt in the name change with the intent to kill Premier from trading? I'm pretty much done with the "let's slam KA hour" with you.

RE: "I know what I think, but I'd like to hear your take and that of anyone else who believes Ken is being forthright"

all these gaffs at the very beginning is NOT the way to do this, whether its a scam or not a scam.

disclaimer!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You know for a fact they don't have the money to mine a mine?

What possible legitimate reason would Ken Ash have for limiting this "unqualified" private offering to existing PIPI shareholders?

I know what I think, but I'd like to hear your take and that of anyone else who believes Ken is being forthright.

Sans transparency, we don't know that. In the absence of transparency one has to assume the more realistic scenario that they do not have the money to operate a producing, profitable mine. If they had the money to do so, they'd be trumpeting it from the church spires. And they wouldn't be trying to soak already beleaguered longs for more money.

That's just Business 101.

Business 101 is clearly absent from the backgrounds of the principals here, based on the state of PIPI as a publicly traded entity, and the history of poorly written, inaccurate, misleading PRs. What exactly are the CVs of KA and GA again? Oh yeah, that's apparently a secret. So much for transparency again.

Seems not much progress has been made since the suspension for inadequate and inaccurate information. Bummer.

Thanks.

Already done.

I plead stupidity and ignorance CBM, do you think you can forgive me?

Thanks for the clarification Cassandra. I was definitely wrong on that comment, I was trying to recall from memory and apparently the memory isn't what it used to be. Thanks for the correction.

So what you believe is: Management does not mean 2 & and half cents raising $500k. You believe that management means 1/40th of a penny (.00025 to a pps) and is only raising $5k.

So ... you are saying that shareholders, buying into the circular, are being mislead and would actually be sold stock at .00025 when it is trading 120 times above this level, currently? If that ridiculous theory, of yours, is true ... isn't that the company who would be getting hurt and not the shareholder? Do you think that a shareholder intending on paying .025 per share would actually be angry to pay .00025 per share?? Seriously? I know that I sound ridiculous, but I want you to see the basic logic behind this "fight for raising $5k" which doesn't exist.

RE: "Charles & the hear no evil see no evil group are blinded by that darn ka kool aide drink"

Oh again, Cassara, you are ripping apart a pr without seeing the offering circular. I will repeat: no one is mislead since this is ONLY available to existing shareholders. No one 'not involved' in Premier, currently, is permitted to participate. You are fighting for a cause that does not exist.

RE: "Additionally I did a Google search as you suggested and did not find anything that backs up your claim that there are multiple correct"

How come no one picked up on this until now? It's kind of coincidence that it is coming up now, when business is being announced. Deception? where? Who gets deceived when they see no bid or ask if they intend to buy this so-called "pink" stock? They will know it's a "grey" (if and) when they choose to place an order. Correct?


RE: "All 4 of the most recent press releases have falsely claimed that ANWM/PIPI is a Pink Sheet stock. Why all of this deception..."

HaHa. You nor I know that. Money is being spent now isn't it? Someone is obviously paying for the permitting which the TMT claims is near done.

RE: "what does this tainted shell bring to the table exactly? They have none of the things needed; not even close to enough money, even with their hokey financing plan."

Thanks Otter. Yes I agree, with a suspension in the history a stock and new entity, like this, will always be guilty until proven innocent. Rightfully so? Maybe. I hope that changes with revenue and business. I, for one, am confident that it will. Glad to meet you on the neutral line and have rational discussion man.

I don't know where you and I are not landing on the same page.

A) I agree with you that grey is not pink and grey should have been stated, not pink. I've agreed with you 3 times now.

B) Maybe KA should know that. I don't need to. I'm an independent investor my friend.

RE: "Grey is NOT pink and I hope KA and you should know that"

Sure he meant it, Charles & the hear no evil see no evil group are blinded by that darn ka kool aide drink.

You cannot possibly mean what you just wrote. I have to assume you are trying to be funny, because you have far too much experience to make these statements. I consider this intentionally misleading or insulting to PIPI shareholders.

OTC Market Tiers
Pink is a tier of OTC. Grey is not a tier within Pink, it is wholly outside of and well below Pink. Ken Ash's proclamation that PIPI is Pink is either intentional misinformation, or arrogant stupidity.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/otc-101/otc-market-tiers

PIPI bears these 2 marks of shame:




As for the math:
No. What Ken Ash wrote is exactly what it was: fractions of a penny. Not 2.5 cents. This is simple math and simple fact. I think decimal places and dollar vs cent designations are taught in 4th or 5th grade.

No amount of fudging and deflection can change that Mr Ash, once again, made a glaring error, or intends to deceive. Either way, a correction is in order.

Do you really intend to stand behind this misinformation??

You are 100% wrong Charles!

All 4 of the most recent press releases have falsely claimed that ANWM/PIPI is a Pink Sheet stock. Why all of this deception Ken???

New Jersey -- The President of Anywhere MD Inc. (PinkSheets:ANWM) announced today that the company has received FINRA approval of our corporate name and symbol change.
http://finance.boston.com/boston/news/read?GUID=21065719

New Jersey -- Premier Investment Properties Inc (pinkotc:PIPI) is pleased to announce it has entered into a definitive agreement with Mohave Gold Mining and Exploration, Inc.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/premier-investment-properties-enters-into-definitive-agreement-2012-04-23

New Jersey -- Premier Investment Properties Inc (PinkOTC:PIPI) is pleased to disclose the details of its definitive agreement with Mohave Gold Mining and Exploration, Inc.
http://finance.boston.com/boston/news/read?GUID=21180403

New Jersey -- Premier Investment Properties Inc. (pinkotc:PIPI) is pleased to disclose the financing of the La Dama de Oro project.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/premier-investment-properties-discloses-financing-2012-04-27

Only the first press release Ken Ash issued after the suspension does not make the false claim of this stock being a Pink Sheet issue:

NEW JERSEY -- On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 ANYWHERE MD INC (Stock Symbol: ANWM) received an Order of Suspension of Trading from the S.E.C.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64555261

As far as I can tell, the Pink OTC has 4 tiers: current, limited, no, and gray so to say PIPI is Pink OTC is definitely accurate.

Also, Google how to put decimals into cents and you will find there are multiple correct ways to do it.

All is moving forward and the new CEO is honest and doing what he believes best for shareholders.

Yeah, the mining guys on iHub with real industry knowledge and experience will have a ball with PIPI. They are far too knowledgable about the money, permitting, time and knowledge needed to actually mine, extract and process metals.

Again, if The Lady of Gold is a real mine with potential, what does this tainted shell bring to the table exactly? They have none of the things needed; not even close to enough money, even with their hokey financing plan.

Micro caps don't mine they explore, The mining act alone won't let sub-junior mine at all. Too much risk,need millions in the bank,that's over hundred million. No insurer will give insurance at the low level you guys are at. Also, the permits won't come down with the demonstration of at least a year's G&A plus insurance etc, Too small to do anything like mining. Just drill core and help the Geo's prove-up their property and eventually take it back, Value added for them. Shares sold to many for nothing. Good Luck...Sadly I Learned a SAD lesson...

if this is such an absolute winner.....why all the foibles and errors? why? the shabbiness is NOT good. I still have some ANWM in my family and friends that held and didnt sell when I did( I bought at .003 and sold at .03) so I want this to work. It just seems they are starting off with all the bells and whistles ringing for the wrong reasons

Hi space

Appreciate the candid answer. It sometimes hard to see through all the bickering, whether they be good points or not, but you did that quite well. You make some very good points, things each shareholder will have to make up their own minds about.

Typos and such happen, its kind of like trying to hear the tone of a message via email. But the history here makes them a little more suspect. Hopefully they can clear things up in a hurry and each one of us attains the ability to move forward however we wish.

Best of luck to all.

Otter

folie a deux............the disclaimer.

Space not ONCE but TWICE.....Grey is NOT pink and I hope KA and you should know that.....SAD, SAD, SAD...