Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Companies need to be able to stand on their own feet, without assistance like this PPP. PPP was another fraud in the making for many.
There were a lot of companies that were dumb enough to take the PPP. Or, they embellished the need requirements, or they falsified information, to get PPP money.
Law Office of Jason Ostendorf LLC
@LawOfficeJasonO
$SIRC Massey update - Good news and Bad news.
I previously mentioned that the other defendant - Laura Mettias - filed a motion to dismiss the counts against her. The judge ruled on the motion about 30 minutes ago.
Bad news - The motion was granted.
Good news - The dismissal was not with prejudice. What this means is that the judge didn't say there was no there there. Rather, the judge just wanted more facts specific to Mettias. So, we have 30 days to amend the complaint to add more specific facts outlining the role Mettias played.
Other Good news - The Order has no effect on the numerous claims made against Massey alone. Instead, the Order only pertains to the PPP loan allegations that involved Mettias. The only claims against MAssey alone still stand unscathed.
Other Good news - As I mentioned in a prior post, we have a default against Massey, and can now move for a default judgment against him. Today's Order has no effect on that.
Summary: The judge wanted more specific facts outlining the role Mettias played in the PPP scheme, and we will provide those additional facts sometime in the next 30 days. This should result in the claims against Mettias being allowed to move forward. Dave is still in Default, and we will pursue a default judgment in due course, as today's Order does not affect that.
Have a great weekend.
Thx for your opinion. I'm going to watch anyways.
it's just another dilution scam.
What makes it so bad? I'm just curious. Like I said, I am just setting on my watch list. Not jumping in just yet until I see some positive movement.
why is there people always talking about SIRC?
because it's a blatant scam. if you are hearing people say otherwise, you need new people.
Hi,
I rather engage
I do not think there will be another Reverse Split.
In their last PR I believe SIRC said they were Cash Positive
I think they will either go under or in the near future start buying the stock back, if they can?
Half the outstanding stock is restricted. So that is a question in itself.
I can't see them doing another R/S.
I do not know that much about Stocks and Options
That post was a mistake. Ignore it.
But if you want to engage, then answer my question rather than avoiding it.
Hi,
I asked you this:
I thought we had a deal about replying or messaging each other.
Is the deal off??
Just researching here. What's up with this one? Why this down since the R/S back in Jan? Is there no confidence in this one? And if no confidence, why is there people always talking about SIRC? Is there no hope here? Maybe, I will just put this on my Watchlist, for now.
I try to appreciate all posts.
Anybody who paid attention to your posts here (starting March '23 when $SIRC was trading at $5/share adjusted for RS) should have seen the writing on the wall and exited way back then.
Not to toot my own horn, but those who paid attention to MY posts starting the prior year would have considered exiting 10 times higher than that at $50...
Regardless, it amazes me how many folks are offended by the truth, or refuse to acknowledge it because it's not presented in a format they're willing to comprehend.
Too bad, so sad for those w/ brains too inflexible to grow & learn.
Some retail are more committed to the shitty OTCs they own than they'd ever be to a life-partner...
You and your NASTY LITTLE MEMES only shows that you act like an immature child.
I have already told you to grow up twice.
But I guess you do not understand that.
In fact, you try to hide behind YOUR MEMES
But you can't hide, your name shows up.
In fact, about 95% of all the MEMES are yours.
You have not once added any information on SIRC since you have been on the board.
CHILDREN MUST PLAY !!!!!
Hi creakyhottie,
I think you are right. The dog ate the summons.
Off the top of my head, I think they are suing him for a Billion Dollars.
Wasn't it said that SIRC'S Attorney could only practice Law in Delaware or in someplace like that.
They had to hire Attorneys in California to Summons Massey.
I believe there were three Attorneys altogether.
Thank God SIRC told us in the last PR that they were Cash Positive.
10/10 full credit for a complete and correct answer.
PEMBROKE1
I assume they are going for a default judgement.
I assume technically Massey could try to convince a court that it should be overturned (either he was not served the summons and complaint properly,
or his dog ate his response to the complaint).
I would also assume as he may not have any assets, or has possibly hid them very well (other people's names, offshore corporations etc), he does not care if there is a judgement against him, as there is nothing to collect from, or they won't be able to find anything to collect from. So why waste $$$ on hiring an attorney to defend himself.
Just my conjecture.
Hi creakyhottie,
How have you been?
Pop in more often.
Please keep me informed.
Thank you for the information.
What I do not understand is:
The part that says Massey is in DEFAULT. (That Doesn't mean that Massey lost the case). Can't he still go back to court?
It will probably end up that you can't get BLOOD out of a ROCK.
Doesn't mention anything about Laura Mattias at the end,
Pembroke1
A little update on the $SIRC lawsuit against Massey. One step closer to a collectible judgment against Massey.
— Law Office of Jason Ostendorf LLC (@LawOfficeJasonO) May 1, 2024
While I would like to take his deposition, a potential quick judgment is not a bad thing. Further update to follow. Enjoy.@SIRCStock @BrettRosen325 @DEUSVULTREV68 pic.twitter.com/10GsJtvNeG
What I said to your buddy applies to you also.!!
That also includes your NASTY MEMES.
I LEFT SOMETHING OUT!!
The only information you have added to SIRC's Message Board. Including your last Message.
IS MEMES!!!!
You don't know what Grow Up means.
Can you believe this?.
Another amended filing. Filed on 4-29-2024.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/399500/content
I thought we had a deal about replying or messaging each other.
Is the deal off??
When’s the next R/S?
Of course, they were, the Yacht convention is coming up. Need new Sails. ⛵️
It appears that the Common Shares Outstanding on 4-17-2024 were 4,387,694,945.
The Common Shares outstanding on 4-22-2024 are. 5,035,155,670
Looks like SIRC was busy diluting shares in those 5 days.
complete and total nonsense. filings are done by sec reporting companies. non reporting companies MAY make submission to otcm. pink sheet companies can be either. or neither.
no you need to understand how Pink sheets are even allowed to trade, all filings are made to OTCMarkets com for pink sheets.
SIRC doesnt “report” to the SEC, has no obligations there so dont expect 8K. 10Q or 10A forms. just what the OTC Market wants them to say.
Well yeah it’s official on otc so it’s technically a filing
that is complete ant total bullshit. filings are made to the sec. otcm, which is not a regulator, publishes submissions.
Well yeah it’s official on otc so it’s technically a filing imo. Have a good day. I am not here to be called names and crap. U welcome for Kerri f u know the company spoke out.
filing??? you've got to be kidding. or conning.
Read the filling there is some good Info in it and updates. To each their own!
lololol;
1) The process of recovering our investment continues...
2) There is no new information to report...
3) The project is still awaiting a deal ...
4) No updates are available at this time...
5) I don’t have visibility...
I did find this on OPTEC Message Board
None of the links appeared to be about OPTEC or Brett Rosen
Reminder: Brett Rosen aka Brett Hackspacher:
Since some OPTI shareholders want Brett Rosen and Michael Sinensky to help rescue OPTI, here’s a reminder about Brett:
H /T to tdbowieknife in #72313, Deep6 in #73249, and Ruthlesstoend in #66100: Brett Rosen is a NY felon who moved to California and changed his last name from Hackspacher to Rosen.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=160797763
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=159848063
Additional info:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Name change:
His name was changed in San Diego in 2015: . https://unicourt.com/case/ca-sd-petition-of-hackspacher-628042.
Petition by Brett David Hackspacher.
“People search” websites show some of Brett’s aliases, e.g.:
https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/find/person/punr26n8r098uu44r06u
https://clustrmaps.com/person/Hackspacher-9p0uqa
“The most common alternative names for he (sic) are Brett Hackspacher, Brett D Rosen, Brett Rosen, Brett Hackspacker, Brett Hackstazher.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Here are 2 reports on Ripoffreport.com:
Deep6 posted this:
https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/brett-hackspacher-thomas-j-beener/la-jolla-california-92037/brett-hackspacher-thomas-j-beenerbe-very-careful-if-you-have-any-dealings-with-brett-hac-340315
Here’s another:
https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/brett-hackspacher/la-jolla-california-92037/bbrett-hackspacher-scam-artist-con-man-drug-dealer-confidence-man-pedofile-san-diego-a-340344
And here’s a 2008 comment I found on the same website: “I knew BRETT HACKSPACHER when he lived in New York and I wanted to make sure his name was spelled correctly. It is true that he was convicted of a felony for the sale and distibution of cocaine and was sentenced for one year. When I knew him he was the biggest liar I knew. Pushy, arrogants and high on drugs. Glad to see he has moved to San Diego because we in New York have enough to deal with!”
Another person on Ripoff Reports accused him of bad behavior in CA (including substance abuse, paranoid behavior, and making death threats) and said “many persons signed declarations attesting to this”. That commenter also said that Brett was fired by David Nava.
Sounds like Brett learned from Nava before he was fired (apparently at another company, which is no longer active):
“La Jolla financial services firm CEO pleads guilty to securities fraud”, 10/7/2020
https://fox5sandiego.com/news/local-news/la-jolla-financial-services-firm-ceo-pleads-guilty-to-securities-fraud/
“SAN DIEGO (CNS) – The CEO of a La Jolla-based financial services firm pleaded guilty Wednesday to defrauding shareholders, falsifying tax returns and operating an unlicensed money services business.
David Nava, head of Surf Financial Group LLC, worked with others to convert publicly traded companies’ debt into unrestricted stock under false pretenses, and then sold the stock, despite being banned since 1994 by federal securities regulators from taking part in the securities industry, according to federal prosecutors.”
More details:
US DOJ: “CEO of Financial Firm Pleads Guilty to Running Multi-Million Dollar Securities and Tax Fraud Scheme, and Operating an Unlicensed Money Services Business”
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ceo-financial-firm-pleads-guilty-running-multi-million-dollar-securities-and-tax-fraud-scheme
Hi, maybe you can help me out?
Can you tell me where to go to get the information?
Apparently, I am looking in the wrong place.
I checked George sharp twitter account and didn't find anything.
I also went to his Website (Clipper Corporate Partners, INC under litigation and found nothing
I also didn't see him say anything on Stocktwits that he or Brett posted
I didn't find anything under OPTEC stock.
I looked under Brett Rosens twitter account and did not find anything.
some may find this interesting.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174288391&txt2find=rosen
Wow, is this scam still trading?
Bahahahaha
Go to the bottom of the 4th page from the last.
It starts there.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/397891/content
Can you show me the link? Thanks! I would love to see people suing SIRC for breaching SEC rules! Massey and Brad lied to shareholders!
You can add this to it:
Below was in the First Attorneys Letter
Different than the Amended Letter
No Reliance by Other Persons. No person or entity other than OTC Markets Group is entitled to rely upon
this Opinion of Counsel. OTC Markets Group, however, is granted full and complete permission and rights to publish
this document via the OTC Disclosure & News Service for viewing by the general public and regulators. The public and
OTC Markets Group may rely on the above in determining whether the Company has made adequate current information
publicly available within the meaning of Rule 144(c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Amended Attorneys Letter
I believe it has to do with SIRC's Common Stock.
I am not positive, but I believe it has to do with below.
Reliance. OTC Markets Group, Inc. (“OTC Markets Group”) is entitled to rely on this First Revised Opinion of Counsel in determining whether the Company has made adequate current information publicly available within the meaning of Rule 144(c)(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Do you know what changed in the amended versions?
Amended Attorney Letter
Filed today. 4/18/2024
Attorney Letter with Respect to Current Information - Amended attorney letter for the period ending 12/31/2023.
filing date 04/18/2024
I miss that guy...
What is the purpose of sending me this message?
Why do you post this stupid message all the time?
Grow up!!!
This FLOORLESS financing Death Spiral is a blast.
Cherry, we hardly knew ye.
Followers
|
396
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
37721
|
Created
|
11/04/09
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators price_and_volume |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |