Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ha ha! Nice! He hates evidence. Like when he claimed he made $2 million on MSMY and I showed him evidence to prove it was a big lie. Ah well, at least he's having fun pretending to be a big player.
I totally agree! I think now is the time to load up and wait.
Geez, how many straw men statements are you going to make?! I never said any of the things you stated. My point simply is that they're not going to give away the new shares for nothing. They will use them for leverage in one form or another. Whether to gain additional capital or to acquire other companies. Such a simple point to obfuscate its meaning.
Hopefully, the $10 million capital they just raised is enough to get them SaaS ready. But it doesn't seem to matter right now anyway, as market manipulators are intent on driving this into the ground, it seems.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha, no you're wrong.
No, you're leaving something obvious and important out of the equation. If they do turn those AS into OS, then they will get something of value for the new shares. If they issue those shares in a secondary public offering, they will get more cash. If they use those shares to acquire another company, they will add the value of that synergy.
Something brewing here guys? Dramatic climb on high volume.
I still don't understand how Van Noy taking 51% of voting power by unilaterally issuing himself 1,000 of new series H stock can possibly be legal. How can he usurp us common shareholders' voting power like that? What if Tim Cook did that with AAPL? How can this be legal?
The only way the company can raise more money that way is by issuing new shares, like with a public offering or like the individual deal they did last time to raise the $10 million. The company is not "selling" its own shares now.
I mean your post is spot on - you are absolutely right. But how long is their rubberband? They had no problem absorbing another 20 million shares this morning. Even if this does eventually catapult, it sickens me to think that these shorts can cover for less than they sold their borrowed shares for and make a ton of money off other longs who gave up early. If this is illegal market manipulation, they should not profit from this.
See what I'm talking about?! Absolutely stunning news - this should be through the roof! Huge volume, was up 30% and then crashed AS USUAL. How can this be anything other than blatant, illegal market manipulation. This stock should be at least .25 or .30 by now. Instead it looks like it's being intentionally suppressed.
Thanks for the post and the link.
Maybe this suspicion needs to be reported to the SEC. Detached has had good insight, maybe he could offer a suggestion. Detached, do you know how to report this suspicion?
Yes, that's exactly what I'm talking about. The other day I bought 200k at the ask, but the ask was only 10k. But my 200k was processed almost immediately and then the ask was still only 10k shares again!
Here is my thoughts guys on this stock declining every day for weeks. Let me know if you agree or not.
I think there is a single trader, or perhaps a market maker that is systematically shorting this stock, trying to manipulate it downward. On the ask, you always see 10k or 20k shares at a price a bit lower than the previous day's close. Even when a large order buys into the ask, it gets absorbed at that price. I bought 200k shares at the ask one day, when the ask was for 10k shares, but it all quickly got sold at the ask.
This stock always closes lower. This is not how I see freely traded stocks act. Even on a downtrend, there are occasional up days. If this is market manipulation and it continues, it will go down every day. If it is stopped, I believe the share price will explode.
Let me know what you guys think.
Now you need your eyes checked. I didn't post any links. WTH are you ranting about now? Anyhow, you should take some of that $2,000,000 you made off that MSMY stock (LMFAO!!) and buy yourself a little yacht and take a nice little vacay!! But I hope you don't get cited by the SEC for forgetting to register yourself as a 5+% shareholder! LOL!!
What a hypocrite! If I want MY advice taken seriously?! You were caught with a huge lie showing YOUR advice or opinions can't be taken seriously. I'm not the one who brought up the other stock, YOU are! Then the OP showed the huge short volume yesterday, so you're wrong about that too! At this point, you should probably just post under an alias, because no one should take "aussiekevin" seriously.
Ha ha! I knew you would remove your post! Caught you with your pants down!
Nothing I said was false! Even the one thing you tried to refute: 100,000,000 / 455,990,000 = 21.93%. LOL! You may as well come clean, liar!
Shows what a liar you are. If you bought $10,000 of MSMY @ 0.0001, that's 100M shares, which is about 22% of MSMY's float. If you bought 22% of the stock, it would have made the price skyrocket. Then you claimed you sold it at its peak of 0.02, which is $2,000,000. The entire market cap of this stock is less than $6,000,000. That would have cratered the stock. Not to mention you would have had to be registered as a 5+% shareholder. This and your other posts show you are just a liar and have little knowledge of the market. Keep trying to con us though, it's fun!
Thank you so much for taking the time to give such a thoroughly detailed reply, I do appreciate it! I had Google stock prior to the split into two classes, with one class having voting rights and the other not. I thought I remembered voting on it at the time, but I'm not positive. I'm long in CLWD (almost 2.8M shares) and I hope you're right about it's future! Good luck to you too!
How can the CEO unilaterally decide to use a tactic like this to take voting power away from the shareholders to take controlling voting interest in the company? Doesn't the issuance of these new types of shares, done for this purpose, require a vote of the common share shareholders?
Also, I've seen posts that indicate that the institutional shareholder may be able to renegotiate the purchase share price, now that it has gone lower than their purchase price for the $10 million investment. How can that be legal? There should be no guarantee that the institutional shareholder can't lose money on their investment.
I'm surprised CLWD didn't close up on the PR today. If CLWD's "persona" approach truly does get around the Google/Apple cookie issues and the CLWD's competitors cannot, this could be huge. Hope the news gets absorbed over the weekend and we get a nice bounce back. I've picked up a lot more shares on the way down. Now holding over 2.7M GLTA!
Just bought another 650k shares at .095. Now have over 1.8M shares. I see this $10M institutional investor deal as a good thing. Sweet deal for that investor for sure, but CLWD doesn't appear to have much cash on hand, and this $10M will help accelerate their SWARM technology.
I've also got a large position (over 2.5M shares). I expect good things for this company in the future, which the potential of great products in the pipeline.
I wonder if the sudden interest in ADMT might have anything to do with the recent interest in ENDV. ENDV has been spiking upward the last several days and ADMT manufactures at least one product for them.
That's pretty heavy volume. Wonder if someone knows something. I doubt this move has to do with the trademark news.
Stock options to key employees timing seems suspicious to me. They approved 377,000,000 options to key employees at a strike price of 0.0068 on January 5th. That was the price on January 5th, but then it took off like a rocket a couple days later. It seems to me that upper management knew this would take off by January 5th, before they released news to the public. This is at least $35,000,000 of instant free money to a few key employees. It seems the options should have been granted after the news was released and the strike price for the options should be much higher. Does anyone have more information on this or can shed more light on this?
Why would Google and Facebook want to help customers find ways to REDUCE their ad revenue, which is their primary sources of revenue? CLWD is not a pier of FB or GOOG. It would be awesome for one of these giants to gobble up CLWD at a big premium, just to squelch the threat.
Yes, I've been invested in ADMT for several years and have a fairly large holding. But this seller must be sitting on several million shares because he appears to have been unloading for months. Every time the price nudges up, it seems to get smashed right back down.
Who is CDEL? And how many shares does he have to sell?
Does anyone know why this has sunk so low?
They had a great quarterly report, considering they're still operating under COVID. Their revenue has come back up to pre-COVID levels, but their stock price has gone down since that report.