Thanks. Just found the 5/9 court doc. Very interesting wording on that motion.

Not dismissed yet. The order is a joint motion to stay for 30 days then if no further action will turn into a dismissal without prejudice automatically. 30 days would end on around June 3rd. That would indicate the parties have/need 30 days to work out details of potential agreement. If there’s a settlement, it sure would be nice to know the terms this time.

I don’t believe anything until I see it in writing from the courts or VPLM.

The other not so clear point in the continuing concern with Huawei is how the U.S. government would react if they were the company wanting to purchase rights to VPLM patents.

Would or could the FTC or Commerce Dept disallow? Don’t know the answer, just thinking out loud.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174349729

Interesting…would have thought with that volume it would have at least hit a full penny.

We have heard many times that volume precedes price so let’s see what next week brings.

Who knew DJT was a POS fraud?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-media-accountant-borgers-charged-with-massive-fraud-sec/

Agree! I try to only watch the court dockets and block out all the periphery noise.

Yep…read the court filing right when it hit the docket.

To be clear…it’s a 30 day stay to allow settlement then dismissed without prejudice. So the parties have 30 days to finalize agreement.

A lot can happen in 30 days but my guess is there’s already something worked out in principle driving the stay then dismissal.

History has taught us nothing is done deal until it is!

Hauwei is the only company in ND TX. All other cases are in WD TX

Order just hit ND TX docket…Looks like another settlement. Guessing we won’t know the terms of this one either since there are still cases pending in other districts.

Who the f’k is buying this POS? SEC needs to look into the influx of foreign cash!

How many plaintiff companies in the statistical 34% that were overturned went 34-0 at the PTAB AND had their patents come out of ex-parte re-exam stronger than when the re-exam started. My guess is ZERO! While VPLM still has a patent going through re-exam process, it is very possible they will have another patent strengthened after it’s done.

Statistics are helpful for looking backwards at historical data but aren’t always as reliable when trying to forecast the future events when there are new situations present that never happened in the past cases!

Influx of Russian buyers trying to bail him out again. 😂😂

Penny land is too high for this POS!

Right? Look out below…ETTD!

True. Kove trial took 6 freaking years to reach the point of a verdict and now heading to appeals court which could take another 2-3 years. The wheels of justice may have turned slowly in this case but at least they turned. Compared to this, it feels like the VPLM wheels of justice have gone flat!

Wonder if Amazon filed a plethora of IPRs against the Kove patents to try to get them invalidated.

VVVVV…and not only 36 IPR wins but also came out of ex-party re-exam on RBR with many new claims, I think it was 8, which made the RBR patents stronger than before the re-exam. Talk about backfiring on the defendants. MG patent currently in re-exam and believe the same result is possible.

The more we know…

Exactly right Butter. Trials are public so we would know the outcome based on court docs…assuming the trails end with a jury verdict and not dismissed like the previous VPLM cases, which we still know very little about why or what was agreed to with Apple & ATT.

Is this an alter ego? No negative nancy swaying this guy. Just stating some facts.

Saw the schedule and agree with your opinion.

What company efforts? Haven’t seen crap communicated from the company to shareholders since the last PR on the re-exam. Hell, they didn’t even bother communicating the recent 3 billion increase authorized shares to shareholders directly.

Let the attacks start in 3…2…1…

Define volume. Not here to argue but throwing around generalities that there is “no volume” doesn’t jive with what’s happening every day. When insiders continue dumping their shares up to 10% of daily volume suggests the remaining 90% of of daily volume has to come from somewhere other than insiders, no?

Now if you’re referring to the magnitude of daily volume, I agree with you. We’re not going set the world on fire & see share prices rise to any magnitude at the current trading. IMO, we need positive & verifiable court action to get this thing moving up.

Also, pretty sure Emil could exercise his warrants/opinions in any lot size of transaction he chooses as long as they are exercised before the expiration date. Could be a single transaction or 1,400+ transactions…his choice.

Yep! It’s just a paper transaction and not an actual “sell” in the open market like Babs is doing.

Weird thought…if there were no volume to speak of, Babs & other insiders wouldn’t be able to continually dump their shares into the daily transactions.

You’re correct Butter. No need for cash out of pocket when exercising warrants or option on equity positions. The cash needed can be taken from the sales of some shares when exercising the position.

I have done it many times in my past with equity positions I held. Purchased hundreds of thousands of shares over the years without putting up a single penny out of my pocket.

Looks like “honest” Apple is going to be short another $ 2 billion after fine from EU.

😂😂😂

https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/04/tech/apple-europe-antitrust-fine-music-streaming/index.html

Go to Pacer Monitor & look up the cases.

Not just TMus…Verizon as well

Who’s “the company?” Points us to any public PR that confirms this.

No, you got it correct. Apparently some don’t understand what a derivative is.

No thanks DB…I’ll stick to Peet’s or Dunkin Donuts!

Bravo Dung! Well said!

Glad to see the Locksmith/Kipping case done. This thing has gone on so long, I’ve lost track of all the gyrations.

Since this case was already appealed once & the appellate court remanded to district court for trial, can the verdict be appealed again?

I’m hoping this saga is finally over but I’m no attorney…and don’t play one on tv either.

Thoughts?

“Wax on…wax off”??? You mean like she’s getting a VPLM Brazilian?

Karate Kid…na. Teaming up with the Iron Sheik (pro wrestler from back in the day) would be more apropos…and he wore “elf” boots.

Bro, give it a rest. None of us like the continued selling by insiders but it’s not illegal. There’s a difference between stupid & illegal.

Also, I believe a hold up in furthering any settlement talks may have been the re-exam. I know is the re-exam was on a different patent but it is still part of the whole enchilada (ie patent suite).

Is it possible Albright is waiting on word from the parties to confirm they cannot reach a pre-trial deal? It’s not out of the question that the judge is deferring to the parties involved if they’re in talks to settle.

Exactly right Butter! There’s enough misinformation here about VPLM. We don’t need a newbie showing up with BS claims.

All 6 cases with Apple have already been terminated. If you want dates & cases, I got receipts. Sure, some were dismissed with prejudice so they can be re-filed but as of right now, there is zero proof in any court dockets showing any new cases.