Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
This link discusses CYDY/LL and is a rather shocking revelation.
https://www.westernjournal.com/report-biden-admin-backchannels-big-tech-makes-secret-request-ridiculous-even-youtube-said-no/
I think I recall reading that if therapeutics were available then the FDA could not authorize the EUA for the vaccines. This is why Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine were put on the backburner. If alternative therapies are available then an EUA does not get authorized. Follow the money.
Worldwide Vaccine Failure
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/worldwide-vaccine-failure
Time for CYDY to step up.
The competition: Pfizer Shares Surge After Release Of 'Miracle' COVID Pill That Is 89% Effective At Preventing Hospitalization
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/pfizer-shares-surge-after-release-miracle-covid-pill-89-effective-preventing
"The key takeaway from the Pfizer announcement is this: Pfizer said studies showed its COVID-19 pill reduced hospitalizations and deaths in high-risk patients by 89%."
Per the NYT:
The U.S. government has been in negotiations with Pfizer for enough pills for 1.7 million courses of treatment, with an additional option for 3.3 million, according to a senior administration official. That is about the same quantity that the United States has ordered from Merck. The government expects to pay about $700 per treatment course for both drugs, the official said.
If Moderna was ever serious about anything to do with CYDY, now might be a good time to consider it.
I'm in CYDY for LL and not for management's lackluster efforts at trying to enter the COVID game. Clearly they are quite late. Fortunately I only bought in due to multiple pathways for revenue. Had CYDY been a one trick pony, I would not be here. I can wait a long time for this company to either be a hero or zero.
C'est la vie... Why would there be anything else to say? What a ridiculous question. People who gamble in the market for the most part have a tidbit of knowledge as to what they are doing. I can't possibly imagine that everyone that buys a stock expects all of them in their portfolio to always go up. Plus, we are, IMO, simply gambling when one plays a stock such as CYDY.
I bought for the drug, not management. The 13d group is not going to do it so for the time being we're just stuck with NP and the promise that LL just might bring to the COVID pandemic. I bought into LL because it appears to do so much more than COVID consequently it is not a one hit wonder. Many other diseases to deal with that LL could have a significant impact on.
IMO, no they are not. Ivermectin should be used as soon as possible after a positive test determines you have it. LL is used when you did not get your test done until the virus has invaded your body for a while and you are now in serious or critical condition. IMO, Ivermectin will not help you much at that stage and this is where LL comes into play.
IMO, I'm not a doctor but it seems that ivermectin is best used when initial diagnosis is first determined. LL is for later stages which is the premise of the Brazil studies. Consequently there is a need, a global huge need for those with covid well beyond the stage where ivermectin is useful.
NIH, not Fauci.... I put this link out on this forum before: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-021-00912-9#author-information
little, there is always the "follow the money" issue with everything that is out and about in the world. Whether one subscribes to what is out there and applies it to their decisions regarding what stock to buy is up to them.
I bought in to CYDY for LL and I consider this a highly speculative risky stock at this time. One day that may change and I'm optimistic about that. I have a very long time line for this to play out. If it goes to zero, I won't be living in a box on the corner.
I come here once in a while to read because there are so many "amusing" posts such as yours provide a bit of a lighter side to my day.
Because those that hold the patents to the vaccines are making a ton of money. They don't make money on the therapeutics.
Texas Doctor Warns Florida and Others: Feds May Ration Monoclonal Antibodies
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/texas-doctor-warns-florida-and-others-feds-may-ration-monoclonal-antibodies
misiu143, IMO, there is no "whatever reason" for Fauci and others wanting only the vaccine. I posted a link here a while back regarding the patents on these vaccines held by what appears to be many at NIH. They make money on those patents, follow the money. They don't make money on invermectin or hydroxichloriquine and they certainly don't make money with LL.
I've recently read that with the massive vaccine failures occurring throughout the world, especially in Israel, the most vaccinated country on the planet, that these major companies (Pfizer, Moderna, etc.) are recognizing the need to move to therapeutics. I have not yet come across any good details on their plans towards therapeutics or what they have in the pipeline other than, I think it was Pfizer, getting ready to test a pill of some sorts.
See who owns patents on these therapeutics being developed. If patents are owned by Fauci and anyone at NIH or wherever, then those therapeutics will certainly get approved quickly.
All IMO.
Follow the money. I posted this link a little while back showing the mRNA patent links. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-021-00912-9
So I ask, if you are in charge of consulting on the approvals of therapeutics but you get a royalty for every mRNA jab, and now boosters, are you going to suggest approval of any therapeutic? Naahhh, you're going to force that jab, collect that royalty and you'll mandate vaccines until everyone around you has it. Boosters forever!! Just like the annual flu shot.
Follow the money. I believe that the NIH and by extension, Fauci, hold multiple patents on this mRNA technology. I don't believe he or NIH have any such links to CYDY/LL.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-021-00912-9
If you're making royalties off of mRNA crap, why would you promote approval of what appears to be the best therapeutic out there. You wouldn't, you'd delay its entry into the marketplace as long as possible to maximize your profit potential on the patents that you do hold.
All IMO of course.
CYDY / LL competition? 90% Of Patients Treated With Experimental Israeli COVID Drug Discharged Within 5 Days
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/90-patients-treated-experimental-israeli-covid-drug-discharged-within-5-days
I know that I bought into CYDY because it was not a COVID one-hit wonder but had other avenues for the potential to generate revenue based on LL. If they are to remain in the COVID game, they need to get going. Brazil needs to be a good result or they need to focus on their other adventures.
That is true. While I doubt that I'll vote a management change, underneath it all I don't find Nader to be the most qualified to lead this company forward either.
Yeah, and Dr. Robert Malone who invented the mRNA technology might take a bit of an issue with the future regardless of what Katalin might be working on. Two years? Not likely unless Fauci is still in place, heck, then it might be two weeks. Why wait?
Too much testing is required for this gene therapy considering it is so new. That would be way more than two years. While LL might be deemed an "old" solution, I'd take that way before anything related to mRNA.
"Previously, the fastest vaccine to go from development to deployment was the mumps vaccine in the 1960s, which took about four years." And this was for a vaccine when everyone at the time understood how to do a true vaccine and not gene therapy. Anyone thinking that mRNA gene therapy can be tested faster needs to rethink that notion.
Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA technology would probably agree too.
One of the better posts describing the current government take-over of we the sheeple and the health care system. Do as I say...get that jab, we the big stock holders of BP need more of your money. Forget therapeutics, we haven't approved any that work. We'll tell you what you can and cannot use and if it doesn't make us money, you aren't getting it. :)
The "potential" for mRNA technologies may indeed be quite promising, after years and years and years of testing.
Dr. Robert Malone, mRNA Vaccine Inventor, on the Bioethics of Experimental Vaccines and the ‘Ultimate Gaslighting’
https://www.theepochtimes.com/dr-robert-malone-mrna-vaccine-inventor-on-the-bioethics-of-experimental-vaccines-and-the-ultimate-gaslighting_3889805.html
mRNA technology is showing its ugly side with the considerable number of issues due to these vaccines. Even the inventor (I think it is Malone) is having issues with how these are working.
IMO, mRNA technologies have years and years of testing to go just for COVID let alone other diseases.
'Casedemic' Over? Wealthy Nations Focus On Hospitalizations As COVID Becomes "Endemic" Like The Flu
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/wealthy-nations-focus-hospitalizations-covid-becomes-endemic-flu
Yep, could be a good need globally for CYDY / LL.
Looks like this is why Merck went to therapeutics and this is probable competition for CYDY/LL. Too bad CYDY couldn't get that $1.2B.
Horowitz: Merck rejects ivermectin for COVID treatment after getting $1.2 billion gov’t contract for expensive, unproven drug
https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-merck-rejects-ivermectin-for-covid-treatment-after-getting-12-billion-govt-contract-for-expensive-unproven-drug
India pre-orders 300 million doses of unapproved Covid-19 vaccine by domestic drugmaker Biological-E
https://www.rt.com/news/525540-india-vaccine-covid-order/
Well, it looks like the Indian government is willing to go down the unapproved route for vaccines which seems to point to the magnitude of their problem. So they've pre-ordered an unapproved vaccine so it is at least possible that CYDY might be in the mix for therapeutic therapies.
Yep, when you think cow poop is your solution, CYDY / LL could be looking really good right about now.
India Discourages Citizens from Using Cow Feces to ‘Protect’ Against Coronavirus
https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2021/05/12/india-discourages-citizens-from-using-cow-feces-protect-against-coronavirus/
Great article, thanks for finding it. Someday maybe the FDA will listen.
Yes, post #163667 at 12:53.
Interesting that 60+% of folks there vaccinated and 35% of those testing positive were vaccinated. Guess we'll need LL more than we think.
CYDY should be reaching out to their government immediately.
Vaccine whoops, LL might have a bigger role than we think.
Most Vaccinated Country on Earth Closes Schools and Sports as COVID Cases Surge — 35% of New Cases Are Fully Vaccinated Residents
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/vaccinated-country-earth-closes-schools-sports-covid-cases-surge-35-new-cases-fully-vacinated/
IVR, could use some good information.
I have a friend who is big on IVR so I've begun to look into this. He seems to be quite positive on the outlook to possibly reclaim a value not seen since it tanked in 2018.
For any opinions, good or bad, please support it. I'm simply not finding a ton (at the moment as I've just started) to support his conclusion but will consider jumping in with both feet if there is good info to support it.
Thanks.
They Got Covid One Year Ago. They’re Still Sick.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/they-got-covid-one-year-ago-theyre-still-sick-11615838402?mod=itp_wsj
"Dr. Iwasaki and Dr. Putrino are studying the immune response of long Covid patients. One possibility, says Dr. Putrino, is that Covid causes a massive inflammatory response producing a flood of cytokines, even in mild cases, which can be damaging to the body’s tissues and organs. Hospitalized patients undergoing the so-called cytokine storm get medications to tamp down their inflammatory response but patients at home might not even realize their body is going through one. “That could be a solid explanation of why less-severe cases are more likely to lead to this post-acute Covid phenomenon,” says Dr. Putrino."
Go CYDY
That makes it sound like they are letting rem*death*is*near recoup its costs before anything else comes into play and interrupts that revenue stream.
Come on man, wait?!?!? That's no fun!! :) Looking forward to the official word.
2020Trader, that's so 2020 to wonder where the longs are. I'm only a very recent holder of CYDY but do believe I'll be seeing this through for quite some time. Thanks for asking.
Hmmm, failure to communicate, sounds like a familiar story. :)
CYDY - looking forward to it moving upwards on trail results. And if for some reason it doesn't, it's a long term hold anyway, won't matter.
I was always of the frame of mind that viewing T&A was always better than just TA. CYDY appears to be holding its own just fine and I am looking forward to the upcoming weeks.
Definitely not an accident. Need to protect the "elite" hedge funds ya know. CYDY next on the list. :)
I'd like to thank whatever the reason was for the earlier price drop because I finally managed to pick up a few shares today at $4.53. And just like that, I'm a happy camper.
Indeed and duly noted when I read it. Just putting it out on this board as yet another tidbit of interest. It just goes to show what's out there when trying to research a stock.
Hopefully my buy in will be soon.
I agree. I've been doing my research and following this board and as stated, will be in buy mode as soon as I can. :)