Ziplink, Inc. (ZIPL)

[mtrewulf]

Wakey

[pixelkoncept]

they coulda been billionaires if they woulda ran away to the cayman islands! but nooo they had to stay here. hahahaa

[Leigh01]

They weren't billionaires. lol But good post as a reminder.

Really apples and oranges though. My understanding was Zach had control with Preferred Shares. He did nothing wrong. The shell guys and lawyers screwed up. IMO

[pixelkoncept]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Ebbers

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Lay

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Skilling

[mtrewulf]

JR sure knows how to raise $$$$$$$$$$$$$
Lots of bag holders left in the wake.

[SHREDDER]

You guys should be thankful the Minxx merger didn't go through

Look what happening to the WRII shell! almost triple zeros!

[mtrewulf]

Wow that's a long call, 27 days long. Can we get an answer
yet?

[investwise4858]

ZIPL

Have call into Zachs.

[mtrewulf]

Ask Investwise

[anex]

anyone knows anything about the future of this shell?

[SOROS]

Does anyone know Investwise or what happened to him or how to find him?

[glenmorangie2]

cautionupahead do you think he was lying to you about a divy payout ?

It all just seems very coincidental that after 7 years of nothing he decided its time to give the shareholders a divy and at that very same time the company gets highjacked by an other entity. What are the chances ?

Will be happy if he does but not holding my breath.

GM

[Leigh01]

I like R/M's. Particularly one that has more value than the shell. They can be a bumpy road sometimes. GLTU

[mtrewulf]

My guess is that they thought my thoughts
might make some fence sitters like myself,
hold this time instead of taking that leap
of faith that burned so many here. If it's
real this time SHOW ME THE MONEY.
PS: I see you and I have visited a few of
the same boards. How do you like the atmosphere
over at ONMC ? I'm hoping I've learned my
lesson regarding reverse merger deals.
I like the action of REAL BUSINESSES doing
REAL BUSINESS. Hence 'CEQI' & 'HMBG'
GLTY Peace

[Leigh01]

Guess they thought posts your opinions about ZIPL on the ZIPL board.

[mtrewulf]

Well, I gotta hand it to the ZIPL/WRII MODS.
If you have the audacity to suggest that the
history at ZIPL MIGHT, just MIGHT, make a good
case for proceeding cautiously with WRII they
delete all your posts. For me that speaks VOLUMES.
Credibility Issues Big Time. I Guess being HONEST
is a legitimate reason to delete a posters post,
in that world. I'm sorry for the state of deceit
that perpetuates Penny Land.
the LOVE of money.....................SAD

[LOL]

no

[Daviddd]

Hey cautionupahead, have you spoke with Mr. Zach any further concerning these intellectual rights or have any idea who, what, where or when?

Quote:
He also mentioned that ZIPL has some intellectual rights, wouldn't tell me what, and all of the shareholders would be getting a distribution of money for that, every shareholder will get the exact same amount

[glenmorangie2]

investwise4858 any feedback from Zachs on what he intends to do with company ?

Is this shell back to being dormant again ?


GM

[glenmorangie2]

15-12g took place in 12/04/2000 for ZIPL.


GM

[Phoenix-Rising]

15-12G?

"When a firm “goes dark” it deregisters with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and delists its shares. Deregistered firms are no longer required to make SEC filings such as annual reports, proxies, 10-Ks, 10-Qs and other important documents. And they’re no longer required to have annual meetings or elect outside directors.

To deregister, a firm files Form 15-12G (Securities Registration Termination) with the SEC stating its intent to deregister, usually by a certain date. Once that date arrives, the stock exchange or NASDAQ prohibits future trading in the shares. The firm’s shares are then relegated to the pink sheets, where liquidity is usually much lower. Although the actual process takes some time, the firm’s share price typically will decline immediately after the “going dark” announcement, since many institutions are prohibited from owning shares of firms that don’t file with the SEC or trade on the exchanges or NASDAQ.

Does not mean the company is not trading...

[bullcents]

look at the SEC's website....mdurr

[schreigl]

As I told I´m out. Quite a big loss. My fault and not the first time. WRII wasn´t so good today. For what reason you guess? TIA.

[Leigh01]

How can you say a scam when it was posted on NV site?

Deal fell through...wasn't a scam.

[Phoenix-Rising]

As far as de-listed you are mistaken..
ZIPL is trading on the pinks..
16.8 k traded today...
and no where on the OTCBB list does it say delisted..

[Leigh01]

How is Zach's in deep crap? Not sure billionaires can ever be in deep crap. IMO

[bullcents]

bnice lol...I'm just trying to tell you guys, that you should always check stuff out with the SEC. Then you wont get screwed. Hopefully, you get something back, cuz that was a terrible scam.

[bullcents]

Ziplink is a scam. Zach's didnt get lucky...he's in deep crap.

[bnice33]

why are you here, you yell and scream about trouble makers, then you go on to other boards and talk smack. You clearly stated that you don't, and never did have a stake in this shell. Good for you, some of us did, and took a beating in the process, no need to come over here and yap about ho glad you are that you didn't buy in.

[Leigh01]

Can you read...LOL

Key word being "assumed"

[bullcents]

lmao....where do you get your information from?

You cant make a deal with anyone if you dont file statements with the SEC, and obviously Ziplink did NOT.

[bullcents]

glad i didnt buy into this thing...looks like it's being investigated. Just goes to prove where people on this board get their info from...including the mods

http://new.quote.com/stocks/story.action?id=MTO257u8631

also, ZIPL is now an invalid ticker symbol.

[Leigh01]

I sure don't.

[mtrewulf]

so does anyone have a clue where Zachs takes
this from here?

[Leigh01]

yep yep...with Mr. Zachs deep pockets and the money they invested to acquire the shell would make sense.

[Phoenix-Rising]

I would imagine they did..

[Leigh01]

I assumed MINXX tried to make a deal.

[Phoenix-Rising]

I dont believe he would have made anything.. the company was legally highjacked. Now if he caught them and they still wanted the deal to happen, yes he would have made money.

[Leigh01]

Zachs got lucky b/c someone made a mistake. IMO

With his money and reputation in charities, he probably didn't want to be associated with a "Gentleman's Club." This is just a guess though.

Because he sure would have made money on the deal.

[MerryPrankster]

Well, yes, it sort of his own fault.

But I imagine he is a busy man as well.

[Leigh01]

Probably b/c no filings done for 6 years. LOL

[Reddog65]

Looks like it. Same situation.

[Daviddd]

What is a pechala report

[nennwert]

does somebody know the content of todays pechala report?

nennwert

[slimpickens]

Thanks for the lesson Investw. BTW Do you have any info on what the suit between this lawyer Franceschi and Chornomud (Minxx Owner) is?

http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-nvdce/case_no-2:2007cv00203/case_id-52996/

[skang]

Thanks for posting that for me.

[Shinoki]

Thanks for the info. Even tho things didn't go as planned, both Minxx, and ZIPL still look to have a happy ending.

[investwise4858]

penny

very true

and we all know how much the states love to get their taxes

back taxes is a very dominant driving force behind the reasons shells are allowed to be transferred.

stuck shareholder concerns are a large factor as well, if somoene new takes it over, then the shareholders get something in return as opposed to what they had mired in the non operating shell company...

[glenmorangie2]

Thanks interwise, maybe recent events will push him into action with regards to looking for a merger candidate.

GM

[Phoenix-Rising]

Thank you for explaining the situation. Many states all it takes to take control of a shell is paying the back taxes owed by the company if they have been dormant for a certain time period.