Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I think it is more like they have a bridge for sale......
Yeah!!! Maybe we actually are buying a mmj farm
$GRCV$ - It's still Alive! Buyers today all
HCIT
JM, me too with a boat load and I too am not worried for I can't lose much now, eh? GLTU
HCIT
I am still around. Still not worried.
As they say, "it's not over til the fat lady sings" with regard to GRCV. I also stayed last time around and bought at .002 and it went up to .013 and I made good money then and will again when it's ready to raise it's ugly head once more - GLTU HGK
I guess this is officially over, could of used that 4k for something else. How's the weed farm closing coming. f'ers
Only if you need losses for 2015 to offset gains on a real ticker.
I care to differ.
What is the difference between the "bid" and "ask" price of a stock? Which one should I pay when I buy?
A: If you've ever traded in a car at car dealership, you understand the difference between the "bid" and "ask" price of a stock.
The bid is the price the dealer is willing to pay to buy from you, be it your used car or a stock you're selling. If you roll onto a car lot with a 1993 four-door Ford Escort LX Hatchback with 100,000 miles, you can expect the dealer to pay $675 if it's in good condition, according to Kelley Blue Book. That's the "bid" price.
But if you went to the dealer to buy the same car, the dealer would sell it to you for $2,220. That's the ask price. The "spread" is the difference between the two: $1,545 in the case of the car.
The same goes for stocks. If you're looking to sell a stock, a broker will offer to buy it for one price, the bid. And if you're looking to buy it, the broker will offer to sell it to you for another, higher ask price. The spread is the broker's profit.
GLTU
9 milly shares? Lol. It's probably like 1 guy selling at 0001.
Exactly the opposite - all sellers at .0001 and no buyers wanting them.
Not a good thing
Shares to trade are building up on the ask the last 2 days from 4m Friday to 7M Yesterday & over 9m & change today. To me, that's the buy side BUT, no bids which show's no one wants to sell! IMO - GLTA
HCIT
What surprises me is that Jarvis hasn't offered any reply to Correnti's last PR.
Actually the real purpose of OTCexchange.info is
so they can keep track of their scams. :)
Where have these thieves taken off to? I can't find their new scam - Anyone else see these gangs on any new tickers?
Pumps and Dumps are just as colorful. It'd be a great movie.
Jarvis and the Zoyes gang are certainly colorful enough. But I'm less sure about me.
Let's do a movie. The title should be Grand Capital & the Pumps N Dumps blog. I guarantee an Oscar nod.
It really would be possible to make a movie about these guys.
Lol. That article is in line for an Oscar.
Hey, read my article again. It's there.
Ahhhh, see I just don't follow close enough anymore.
It was Lion of Judah that bought part of that old note, and then probably converted and sold.
Keep your eyes open on this one. White, Correnti or Dumbo are bound to "acquire" this one soon as all their crap is NO BID.
http://www.corporationwiki.com/p/2f26b4/michael-zoyes
Remember the names on this scam - they will re-appear again until they are jailed.
I guess they ran this into the ground, nice work GRCV.
I mean keys not bury or heads in the sand or live in denial. These guys are crooks. We all know that. It's not a matter of opinion. Most of us who bought just wanted a piece of the action before it took a dump but this just crumbled and screwed all the investors over.
Well I never said 'you' were specifically but it happens on this board. Anyway it was indeed a pleasure debating/chatting with you but I have to wake up in a few hours to go make some money so that can throw it all away by buying more GRCV stock. Have a wonderful rest of the night Janice.
Who's berating you? If you want to buy stock in companies run by convicted felons and SEC sanctioned fraudsters, be my guest.
It's not a bad idea to know what you're getting into, though.
Well to each their own. I live by the principal 'live and let live' and unfortunately many think their opinion should be treated as the law of the land. You are certainly entitled to post your thoughts and opinions on GRVA as do I. So let's agree to respectfully disagree on matters pertaining to GRVC.
I like GRVC as a lotto play, you don't and that's fine. It could pop a few ticks and make me some money or it can reverse split 19 times in 19 days costing me 100% of my money invested. Ether way I don't want to be berated for doing what I want to do with my money. Isn't that fair?
Speaking for myself, I don't trade the stocks I write about. But they ARE fun.
Janice, I am no spring chicken either. I've been around the block quite a few times, and yes I agree..everything is not about money. Finally we agree on something. That said.. I will reiterate what I said earlier; everything relative to the stock market is about money including all posts made on this board.
I'm so glad to hear that.
For some of us, and perhaps more particularly people my age, not everything is about money.
I see. We will continue this conversation later but my phone is dying ( for fun of course).
Right. Because the owners of that site has been ordained to save the masses from scams. LOL. Yeah. Now I get it, it's not about money, it's about 'fun'. Ha ha ha.. I get it. I still own this stock and for fun I am holding. I pay my bills with fun every month.
I haven't ridiculed anyone but Jarvis and the Zoyes gang.
Well that's good of you to say that people can draw their own conclusion from the articles. That said, ridiculing people that 'invest' in GRVC seems contrary to the principle of allowing people to make their own decision relative to GRVC, doesn't it?
Subscriptions are not as lucrative as one might think. The sad truth is that people are far more willing to pay to be told what to buy--even if it crashes and burns--than to be told what to avoid.
And for some of us, outing scammers is just plain fun.
Someone is making money from it Janice. Noting relative to the stock market is done because of kindness. We both know that.
And in what sense is it a scam? Given that you apparently don't even understand what its purpose is.
It works by following the links in the article, which offer documentation. As for the conclusions to be drawn from those facts, they're up to you.
That pump and dump website is a scam within itself. So please humor me as to why it should be considered Credible.
And what do you define to be a fact relative to GRVC? Every thing you say is fact? Everything people in disagreement with you says in non factual? How does one decide what's a fact? How does that work? Please advise.
What on earth are you talking about? Perhaps you've never been there? The point of the site is to out pumpadumpers. And other scammers.
God forbid you should read the article, of course.
So you don't have an answer as to why the pump and dump website being rammed down people's throat should be considered Credible? Just as I thought. Enough said.
Where, exactly, did I claim impartiality? I'm merely citing the facts. Can you show me what Correnti had to say about the events of 23 December after they occurred?
Evidently Jarvis spoke to him that day, and expected a PR. None was forthcoming.
Naturally Jarvis is just as bad. It's such fun to see these people start to fight with each other.
It's funny that you are quoting from an article you wrote, but yet claiming impartiality. Funny stuff Janice. Tell me what's Credible about a website called pump and dump?
Secondly, they have addressed the dump fest somewhat. Maybe not to our liking, but they have. As far as I know as it is public knowledge, the CEO came out and said that the shares that were sold, we're under administrative hold and should not have been cleared by the MMs.
That was BEFORE the selloff.
Grand Capital Ventures' stock hasn't recovered from its December collapse; it has in fact descended ever lower, sinking to $0.0001 on the bid. The day of the selloff, John Jarvis was furious. In late morning, he posted a blog entry at Claire Magazine, and continued to update it throughout the day.
He began on a threatening note: "We are in the process of evaluating the days [sic] events and and what effect this will have on our continued relationship with Grand Capital Venture [sic], Inc." In early afternoon, he said he'd spoken with Correnti and Pacific Transfer and was assured by both that although the "administratively held" shares were "attempted to be traded," they had not been, and that Correnti would be issuing a press release to that effect after the bell. No press release appeared, at least on that subject. News about the convertible preferred did appear, and was described at OTC Markets as "Release#2 dec 23rd 2014," but no other release can be found there. Correnti has yet to make any official comment on the events of 23 December.
http://www.pumpsanddumps.com/2015/02/grcv-why-would-anybody-trust-john.html
Followers
|
257
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
36
|
Posts (Total)
|
27669
|
Created
|
05/31/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators BeachBum Penny Stocks 2.0 |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |