Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What suprises me is how small the R/S is. LOL
Prolly very minimal after 10 or so more R/S...yeah thats the ticket
Can you imagaine the os?
Maybe they both can merge.
We can give that one to Pacel.
symbol not found, maybe CRAP
They should give it this symbol - POOP - is that one taken?
lol... was a MOOer for sure
Oh, yeah - how could I forget that ticker!
You forgot RMOO.....
Symbol Split Ratio Date
RVMO 1:20 R/S 06/18/2006
RVMN 1:75 R/S 02/17/2006
RVNM 1:1000 R/S 07/15/2005
RMOO 1:50 R/S 07/10/2003
RMOO 1:10 R/S 06/30/1999
RAVEN MOON - RVNM, RVMO, RVEM - BEWARE!
Just unfricken believable, someone should shoot that pos and put it out of its misery. jmo
RVMO Raven Moon Announces 1-for-20 Reverse Split with Record Date of July 17, 2006; 40-for-1 Warrant Shares Exercised are Exempt from the Split
Business Wire - June 26, 2006 8:31 AM (EDT)
ORLANDO, Fla., Jun 26, 2006 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Raven Moon Entertainment, Inc. (OTCBB: RVMO) announced today that its Board of Directors and majority shareholders have approved a 1-for-20 reverse split with a record date of July 17, 2006.
The company previously announced a 40-for-1 warrant dividend program that expires on July 25, 2006 and Raven Moon has also recently announced that restricted common shares purchased as a result of exercising the current warrant prior to its expiration date will not be subject to this reverse split or any others within 12 months from the date the shares are issued.
40-for-1 Warrant Terms and Exercise Instructions
The terms of the warrant dividend are: shareholders of record as of May 19, 2006 shall receive 1 warrant for each share of common stock owned as of that date. The warrant allows the shareholder to exercise 40 shares of common restricted stock for each warrant they own and exercise during a two-month window beginning May 25, 2006 to July 25, 2006 at a 40% discount of the closing bid price on the day their check is dated. Common shares purchased as a result of exercising warrants will be restricted for one year. All transactions when accepted by the company are final and irrevocable.
If your account is with a broker, send a copy of your account statement to Raven Moon Entertainment, 2005 Tree Fork Lane, Suite 101, Longwood, FL 32750 no later than July 25, 2006 verifying the number of shares you owned in your account as of May 19, 2006. Indicate the number of warrants you would like to exercise at a 40% discount of the closing bid on the day you write your check and make it payable to Raven Moon Entertainment, Inc.
"Shareholders who exercise their 40-for-1 warrants are helping the company and the company's Board of Directors has authorized the exemption of restricted shares purchased as a result of exercising the current warrant from any potential reverse split that may occur for 12 months," said Joey DiFrancesco, Chairman and CEO of Raven Moon. "We are processing the warrant exercises as we receive them to provide a timely response to our shareholders who want to support the company's progress and increase their position with the company."
Shareholders or brokers who need further information on how to exercise these warrants may contact Carol Merry at Fahlgren Mortine Investor Relations at (614) 825-1750 or by email: carol.merry@fahlgren.com.
Safe Harbor Act Notice: This release may contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including without limitation, acceptance of the company's products, increased levels of competition, product and technological changes, the company's dependence upon financing and third- party suppliers, and other risks detailed from time to time in the company's federal filings, annual report, offering memorandum or prospectus. Specifications are subject to change without notice.
SOURCE: Raven Moon Entertainment, Inc.
Fahlgren Mortine Investor Relations
Carol Merry, 614-825-1750
carol.merry@fahlgren.com
Copyright Business Wire 2006
Posted by: sludgehound
In reply to: dc_320 who wrote msg# 2380
Date:6/14/2006 9:19:57 PM
Post #of 2403
PCCE = PCLO 1:1K Celebrates 10th
June 14, 2006
Pacel Corporation Celebrates Tenth Reverse Split
Pacel Corporation (OTC: PCCE) is celebrating its tenth reverse split in its history as a public company. Pacel executives have managed to fleece investors by completing reverse splits of company stock ten times in the past seven years, and four in just the past year. The price of the company's initial public offering, with adjustments made for the many stock splits, is about $10 million. Below is a table with the complete history of Pacel stock splits.
http://www.antandsons.com/2006/06/pacel-corporation-celebrates-tenth.html
Anybody know whats up with BDYS. I had an order in which was cancelled. And there is no volume today but I can't find out anything.
PCCE:
Posted by: Art2Gecko
In reply to: krznate who wrote msg# 638524
Date:6/14/2006 2:55:04 PM
Post #of 638533
PCLO - Pacel Corp. Reverse Split History
Symbol Split Ratio DatePCCE
1:1000 R/S 06/15/2006PCCN
1:1000 R/S 01/24/2006PCCR
1:1000 R/S 10/25/2005PCLL
1:1000 R/S 06/20/2005PCOR
1:1000 R/S 02/25/2005PCCL
1:100 R/S 09/13/2004PACC
1:100 R/S 02/25/2004PCEL
1:30 R/S 03/17/2003PLRP
1:100 R/S 04/07/2002PLRPD
1:4 R/S 10/07/1999
Well, we all learn from our mistakes and a caveat would be to avoid most stocks mentioned on this thread.
I gots all of dem.
:)
I got 2 of them winners...
HAHAHAH...THAT's the damn truth. BCIT..GVRP...MAMG..PGWC...grrrrrrrrr
shit happens...but why always to us?
yea, that makes sense..lol...creeeeeeps!!!! i'm not in it this time..lol...once was plenty with that one.
Because it is legal to dilute and r/s even though it is a crime!
kinda like me and FMNJ :)
if that doesn't take the cake! why don't they HALT that pos to "protect" the investors...lol...right.
wtg...as usual, I sold & then it went up
I actually made money on it right after that - I think it went sub, I bought more and then it had one of those fake rallies and I got out. One of the worst pos out there along with rvmo!
It was - I think we lost have of what we put into it half hour into the opening! lol
do you remember when you, me & RAGER bot into that way back when? That should have been a sign to you & RAGER...
worse...they are cancelling their registration...a bazillion r\s and then no market for whatever miniscule shares one has left...
This company is as bad as RVMO when it came to screwing their shareholders, imo.
GFYD....the saga continues:Form 15-12G GFY FOODS INC (10K)Mar 27, 2006 06:06
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 15
CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF REGISTRATION UNDER SECTION
12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR SUSPENSION OF DUTY TO FILE
REPORTS UNDER SECTIONS 13 AND 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
Commission File Number 000-33029
GFY Foods, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
601 Deerfield Parkway, Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 (847) 814-7974
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
registrant's principal executive offices)
$.001 par value common stock
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Title of each class of securities covered by this Form)
None
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Titles of all other classes of securities for which a duty to file reports
under section 13(a) or 15(d) remains)
Please place an X in the box(es) to designate the appropriate rule provision(s)
relied upon to terminate or suspend the duty to file reports:
Rule 12g-4(a)(1)(i) [ ] Rule 12h-3(b)(1)(i) [ ]
Rule 12g-4(a)(1)(ii) [X] Rule 12h-3(b)(1)(ii) [ ]
Rule 12g-4(a)(2)(i) [ ] Rule 12h-3(b)(2)(i) [ ]
Rule 12g-4(a)(2)(ii) [ ] Rule 12h-3(b)(2)(ii) [ ]
Rule 15d-6 [ ]
Approximate number of holders of record as of the certification or notice date:
473
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 MediaX
Corporation has caused this certification/notice to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned duly authorized person.
GFY Foods, Inc., a Nevada corporation
By: /s/ Edward Schwalb
---------------------------------
Name: Edward Schwalb
Title: CEO, CFO, Director
Date: March 13, 2006
But he has over 70+ in Indio County alone.
He has over 70 lawsuits against him personally or against the company?
Well in the past 9 months 5 or 6 solid suits that we can find.
But he has over 70+ in Indio County alone.
Plus others are starting that can not be mentioned publicly or privately.
How many lawsuits is that now?
metroG NewsLines
From metroG & our news affiliates ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST 'QTN'
The 'Q' Television Network Has A History Of Breaching Contracts ...
from metroG NewsLines
February 27, 2006
Frank Olsen the self proclaimed
"King Of Gay Media".
Senwot Nella Productions, LLC, recently announced they’ve found it necessary to pursue legal action against Q Television Network for breach of contract, acting in bad faith and an elevated number of punitive damages. QTN entered into contract to air Senwot Nella Production’s episodic series, The CLOSET, only to back out of the executed contract and refusing to pay the pending balance.
When asked if race played a role in QTN’s actions, Fitzgerald Vaughn, Senwot Nella Productions, Senior Executive Producer, replied, "What do you think? The CLOSET was at the time, and perhaps still is, the only show on the network with a predominantly minority cast".
"Mr. Townes and Mr. Allen, along with their legal team, New York based, Cunningham and White, worked diligently with Frank Olsen, President and majority owner of QTN to reach a settlement. In each occurrence, terms would be reached and agreed upon and Mr. Olsen would refuse to place the terms in writing and now he’s refusing to honor the terms of his current contract with Senwot Nella, which is causing this action to take place.", states Mr. Vaughn, he continues, "This really hit Maurice and Kevin from left field. In the beginning things were great, meetings with Frank were a pleasure. It wasn’t until Alexis Fish (her title unknown), joined Frank’s team that things begin to spiral downward. Can you say unprofessional?".
Unfortunately for many vendors and employees, QTN has a history of breaching contracts – both verbal and written. There are hosts of pending lawsuits against the network.
The CLOSET is a mostly Black, gay series, which brings to life stories that effect our every day living. It is unclear why, after seeing the series and being flown several time to QTN’s Burbank studio to hold pleasant meetings with Townes and Allen, Olsen signed the contract only to renege several months later.
According to Vaughn, "at this point, Frank’s reason for reneging is completely irrelevant. I would think QTN’s actions would be genuine considering they are feverishly trying to grow their fleeing stock, which is currently valued at less than a penny per share".
http://www.metrog.com/headline/articles06/060301_qtelevision.html
IBTZ:
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr19571.htm
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 19571 / February 17, 2006
SEC v. iBIZ Technology Corp., Kenneth W. Schilling, H. Mark Perkins, Jeffrey Firestone, Jerrold B. McRoberts, and D. Scott Elliott, CV 2:06-CV-0502 (D. Arizona, filed February 16, 2006)
SEC Files Securities Fraud Charges Against Recidivists iBIZ Technology Corp. and its CEO Kenneth W. Schilling, and Related Charges Against iBIZ Technology Executive Vice President H. Mark Perkins and Three Purported Consultants
On February 16, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed an injunctive action in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona against iBIZ Technology Corp., its CEO Kenneth W. Schilling, its Executive Vice President H. Mark Perkins, and three purported company consultants, Jeffrey Firestone, Jerrold B. McRoberts, and D. Scott Elliott. iBIZ Technology and Schilling are securities law recidivists.
According to the SEC's complaint, iBIZ Technology, Schilling, and Perkins made false and misleading statements in press releases, online interviews, investor correspondence, proxy solicitations, and Commission filings regarding the company's involvement with a development-stage product called the "Virtual Keyboard." At the same time, Schilling and Perkins sold over $1 million worth of their own iBIZ Technology shares into a falsely inflated market. In addition, the SEC asserts that the inflated stock price allowed iBIZ Technology to eliminate approximately $2.8 million of convertible debt that it was otherwise powerless to repay.
The complaint further alleges that all of the defendants engaged in a scheme to raise money for themselves by using Form S-8 registrations statements. The SEC alleges that iBIZ Technology, Schilling and Perkins illegally distributed through Firestone, Elliott and McRoberts approximately $3 million worth of newly issued iBIZ Technology S-8 shares.
The SEC's complaint alleges that iBIZ Technology, Schilling, and Perkins violated the antifraud provisions of the securities laws contained in Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and that all of the defendants violated the registration provisions contained in Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"). The complaint also alleges that iBIZ Technology violated the periodic reporting provisions contained in Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder, and the proxy disclosure rules contained in Sections 14(a) and 14(c) of the Exchange Act and Rules 14a-3, 14a-9, 14c-2, and 14c-6 thereunder. Finally, the complaint alleges that Schilling and Perkins aided and abetted certain violations by the company of these periodic reporting and proxy disclosure provisions. The SEC seeks officer and director bars against Schilling and Perkins, penny stock bars against Schilling, Perkins, Firestone, McRoberts, and Elliott, and disgorgement, plus prejudgment interest, and civil penalties against all of the defendants.
In a related action, on February 16, 2006, the SEC instituted public administrative proceedings pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Exchange Act against iBIZ Technology to determine whether the registration of its securities should be suspended or revoked for failure to file required periodic reports with the Commission in violation of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder.
SEC Complaint in this matter
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr19571.htm
well..I certainly DO keep an eye on this board ;)
Hey dk, nice to see you again. Wonder how effective this "WARNING, WARNING" site will be. being that so many people were "warned" about so many pink sh_t stocks and they still didn't listen. I'm glad this board is around to really discuss the warning aspect of it because you would just get kicked off the board like BigTips was.
re: QBID. There were many good people on the board trying to save those thousands upon thousands of lost money.
Olsen is the biggest fraud of all.
Well the place I was referring to was NOT in Little Italy - it was uptown. I'm sure there were plenty of those type of places.
I didn't even name the city .. lol
the guys got there at 10 am and hung out front till 10 pm
I never got mugged or had anything stolen from my car or appt
Did the name start with a "U"?
lol - I remember a clam store in Manhattan that sold a lot more than clams - I won't name the place.
just speculating here but don't you think that some of the more obscure and nefarious stocks exist purely to launder money ?
when I lived in an italian neighborhood there was a store across the street that only sold potato chips
we all knew it wasn't really about potato chips
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |