Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Hello Bottom Fishing:
Thanks for the post about the suspension,
I have never experienced anything like this before in 20 years, (the situation as it stands with Vitamin Spice aka Qualsec)
All trading must be done through a broker, there are shares that have been issued and validated under false pretenses by the transfer agent, STALT out of California for the benefit of J. Hand, esq,. and his alter ego's, management of VTMS which consists basically of ED. B of PA. who invented the idea, has pursued legal action as a measure against the fraud committed against VTMS and its real shareholders.
Shares issued by VTMS and later freed up under false pretenses by stating to transfer agent STALT that VTMS had never previously been a "shell" was false and contained material misinformation in order for J Hand to gain a control over the trading of VTMS on the public markets. Once discovered, ED. B dba VTMS confronted the issue and discovered that multiple violations of SEC regulations have been perpetrated against the shareholders of VTMS by J Hand and others who were prohibited from engaging in securities activities.
A court case was opened in PA by J Hand and his gang to force a bankruptcy of VTMS. The attempt was unsuccessful, the ruling was that VTMS was allowed to file a counter-claim against HAND, this counter claim was successful. The ruling by the PA judge layed out a case for VTMS against HAND in a way never seen before in "penny stock" cases.
The groundwork being dug here by VTMS and the courts is landmark by its nature. A case will resume in San Clemente CA to determine the merits of the case against HAND by VTMS and its team of high powered attorneys.
It should be notated that there is no love loss between ED. B and Jehu HAND, it seems apparent that ED is seeking to destroy the legal license of HAND permanently, to DISBAR him for LIFE. HAND offers little defense and appears painted in a corner at this time.
Several outcomes remain possible, including the recapture of shares from HAND, cash damages, potential prison time, sanctions and/or injunction orders against HAND by the SEC, courts or both. Other outcomes include, a complete loss to all VTMS investors.
VTMS News COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS SEC Suspends Trading in Securities of VitaminSpice Inc.
From
StockAlerts@scottrade.com
This email is compliments of Scottrade.com
News for 'VTMS' - (COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS - SEC Suspends Trading in Securities of VitaminSpice Inc.)
Feb 19, 2013 (SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION RELEASE/ContentWorks via
COMTEX) -- The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") ordered the
temporary suspension, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), of trading in the securities of VitaminSpice,
Inc., ("VitaminSpice"), quoted on OTC Link, operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc.,
because of questions regarding the adequacy of current financial information
available about VitaminSpice; and the accuracy of assertions by VitaminSpice,
and by others, in press releases to investors, in periodic financial filings and
in internet promotions concerning, among other things, the company's revenues
and operations. VitaminSpice's ticker symbol is VTMS.
The trading suspension will last for ten business days. The trading suspension
commenced at 9:30 a.m. EST on February 19, 2013, and terminates at 11:59 p.m.
EST on March 4, 2013.
The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders, and prospective
purchasers that they should carefull
Copyright (C) 2013 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc.
-0-
Source: Comtex Wall Street News
A person who knew him outside of VTMS. Not going to post it here as Ed reads this.
if you dont mind, who did you hear it from,
i talked to a few people also who said Ed was no good, but they all liked him at first so i dont know what to believe.
Ed hasnt been always polite to me.
My sources are not first hand but they weren't kind about ED and the misappropriation of company funds far beyond strippers and booze, before any shenanigans with Hand.
They idea might have merit and needs something other than this mess of people to make it happen.
I don't know at this point because it seems a cesspool.
I am now on the sidelines where I'll stay I think.
Well I think Hand did Ed dirty...so what's he supposed to do right? he needs to get all the shares back from him if he did improper things, after all, vtms lost alot of street cred and the deal with allan fields fmr ceo of walmart from the stock nonsense.
1) the propagada against ed buckstel is that he drinks and spent money on womans panties and strip club stuff with company money.
2) I dont think he did really anything wrong except maybe drank too much in front of the wrong people or got pissed off at Jehu once he realized what was happening
3) How would you like it if you had all these deals and your lawyer manipulated your stock? Read the court filings, the evidence is pretty crazy against Jehu Hand, he basically signed stuff he shouldnt have and probably did create false identities and he did conspire against ED B to get control of the company.
4) read the first couple of paragraphs of the ruling, talks about historical references of betrayal etc.
5) There is supposed to be a court case taking place, when ? I dont know.
Once the court case takes place and ruling is made: there are three possible outcomes in my mind
a) if ED wins and proves all the charges and gets a judgement, all shares owned by Hand and his conspirators may have to be relinquished, if money is awarded, then ED would have money to bring the financials up to date with SEC and we could trade BB again.
If I was ED I wouldnt want the stock trading now anyway, because Hand can just liquidate and cash in shares at will. So now he can't do that at least.
b) If Ed wins, he says screw it and the shareholders all take a bath and a huge loss. I dont think he will do this but you never know, he may not want to have anything to do with the stock market anymore, and maybe the shell is useless now because HAND has poisoned it. Thats kind of an extreme possibility
c) If VTMS loses against HAND, then the whole thing is sunk for sure.
Please do. I understand some issues with Hand as well so I am not sure who is dirty and who isn't.
Let me just say, I don't think that's really true.
He didn't spend the money on booz and girls any more than anyone else
second thing, do you really understand what went on here allegedly?
I can expand on that for you
Not sure what really happened but my understanding is the CEO took the money needed to produce and distribute the product and spent it on booze and broads.
It seems like he had everything in place to get this going, but for the stock manipulation by certain characters looks like this could have made a run..
now i am interested in talking about this court case and speculate on the results of that and how it could potentially impact shareholders
Seems so certainly someone else could potentially take over the shell and implement the business plan?
Seems like the CEO is not a small part of the problems. He needs to go and new folks take over.
Idea may have merit but execution is poor at best.
So you think its a dead duck stuffed inside a turkey wrapped inside a goats intestines then?>
Why do you think this will never come back> do you have any insights?
not too funny but maybe Ed doesn't want to talk to anyone...
what's the chance this whole thing dissapears into thin or thick air?
I wonder if it will ever start up again?
Budget cutbacks ??
I try to call but the phone has been cut off
IIKings:
I am about as close to this as one can get, and I don't even care to remain anonymous.
How did you come to VTMS and what is your interest?
Thank you
getmoney214,
buddy, i dont know anything except that I have spoken to Ed a few times over at vitamin spice, he acts like the world is against him, he seems even paranoid to me, I told him I am a shareholder and he said he is going to find out who I am and call the fbi cia and the sec, I dont know if they will ever file and get up to date.
I think that Ed wants to recapture the shares from Jehu Hand and all his alter egos , at least that is what I would want to do if I were him. Ed, said he spent tens of thousands on attorneys. In the end what will be accomplished?
Everything now depends on the result of the court case, (I dont even know the status of that) and the filings to bring the shell company up to date so it can resume trading with quotations on the pinks or bb. If you want to , go ahead and call Ed yourself, he won't talk to me.
I own about 2.5 million shares so obviously I believe in the idea, and Actually, i am really interested in ED and his plight to overcome and penetrate the dark side of the penny stock people.
At this point, the suspension is over but I can't tell what difference it really makes.
you can email me at leefish at ymail.com if you wish.
does any one thing this will trade tomorrow
Post Mortem part 3
On July 6, 2010 it came to a head in a telephone conversation between the bookkeeper, Jehu Hand, Ed Bukstel, and others. yes, the bookkeeper was Jehu Hand. He was the one who found the evidence of misappropriation of funds by Bukstel and the lack of internal controls.
There was a heated discussion about the direction of the company and why its progress was stalled. During this discussion, Hand stated his opinion as to why the company was stalled. Hand's opinion, expressed rather forcefully, was because of Bukstel's excessive consumption of alcohol.
Of course, Bukstel was offended. Even more so when Hand emailed Bukstel that evening and iterated his opinion. Following that email, Bukstel fired Hand.
Of course, it was not the most appropriate way for the alcohol issue to be brought to light. But it was, and soon it was general knowledge that Ed had a problem.
Hand and his friends and family had hundreds of thousands of cash invested in the public company and VitaminSpice. Hand was himself paying some company bills because he had almost a million shares himself. He wanted to protect everyone's cash investment.
Hand saw this cash used by Bukstel inappropriately, he saw Bukstel mismanage the company, and he saw Bukstel issue millions of shares for "consulting services" to Bukstel's associates. So you could see why he would be upset.
In a memorandum to all parties the next day, Bukstel informed all parties that Hand had been fired because of his inappropriate outburst. The memo had no mention of any other improprieties by Hand, such as the stock manipulation allegations which came later. Those came later. The source of those allegations is fascinating.
But first, on July 12, 2010, Bukstel issued illegal stop orders on all the public float he could.
All the above taken from court records etc.
Post Mortem Part 2
There were lots of other charges to the company credit card that did not fit in. Dating websites, women's clothing,etc.; here are $2,140 in charges from [img][/img] a massage place called Mission Holistics, in San Francisco
$2,140 in "massages" in one day is quite expensive.
As a result of this, the bookkeeper arranged a meeting with Bukstel to discuss these irregularities and another big issue. There was a second employee on premises, who was supposed to help with keeping the records straight. The company was being run out of Bukstel's hip pocket--- not the way a public company should be. But Bukstel was keeping all the records to himself, which were a mess.
Bukstel is a great salesman but not very good organizationally. We all have are good and bad points, but if you have a public company, you have to learn how to delegate to others.
The meeting in March 2010 did not go well. It did not go well because Bukstel did not show up. Bukstel was "indisposed" and this turned out to the third problem.
Sadly, almost every day during this time period, Bukstel was imbibing heavily. Many business meetings were being missed.
It all came to a head on a fateful July 6, 2010.
POST MORTEM-WHY VTMS FAILED
Chapter 1. Secrets unfolding.
">" />
Not sure if I am doing this image thing right. Anyway, when the 10-K for 2009 was being prepared, the bookkeeper noticed some strange charges on VTMS's bank account. August 6, 2009, Bukstel charged $2,774 on the company's debit card at an establishment titled BJ's Solid Gold, in Conshohoken, Pennsylvania.
Two days' later, there was another set of charges at BJ's for $1,596. (All this taken from court records in the proceedings by the complaining shareholders against Ed Bukstel and VitaminSpice.
Given that VitaminSpice was a start up, with its cash met from ordinary folk's cash investments (including the bookkeeper himself and his friends), cash was tight.
The bookkeeper asked Bukstel what this expenditure was, but got no answer.
Bj's Solid Gold does business under the name "Seventh Heaven."
Here is what Seventh Heaven claims on its website (I have no affilitation with them haha)
Its because of a complaint filed with the SEC by Hand and other investors about VitaminSpice imposing a stop transfer on their stock certificates. After that, Bukstel issued about 60 million shares to "consultants." Some investors in 2009 and 2010 paid for stock and Bukstel refused to give it to them and this really got the SEC's attention.
The investigation started in March 2011. It focused on shares issued to the "consultants" and the lawsuit filed by the investors against Bukstel and VitaminSpice. If you look at the PR put out by VitaminSpice from October 2010 to February 2011 and compare this to the financial statements, you will understand the stop trade. The credit line to help fill "backlog" that did not exist, the $5 million order that never happened, compared to the $697 in sales for the March 31, 2011 quarter and the $17 in sales for the June 2011 quarter, its all there.
"The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of VitaminSpice because of questions regarding the adequacy of current financial information available about VitaminSpice; and the accuracy of assertions by VitaminSpice, and others, in press releases to investors, in periodic financial filings and in internet promotions concerning, among other things, the company's revenues and operations."
This came out of the lawsuit filed by those shareholders against Bukstel and VitaminSpice. It is what they alleged Bukstel was doing. Freezing all the public float so that Bukstel's friends could control the market. The lawsuit made the same allegations about fake press releases and no revenue in the financial matching the press releases. I guess those shareholdes and Hand were right.
in the PINKs they don't normally ever become unsuspended
Is this suspension because of action by VTMS OR Jehu Hand? Time will tell.
You 100% get it. Bad people stole $$ from you
Jehu Hand, James Farinella, Gerard Adams, Joel Hand, Adam Hand, Jeremiah Hand and about 20 other entities are history. Kevin Lee Woodbidge, John Ballard (Littleton CO). These people screwed with the wrong person... It is my hope and prayer that they get orange jumpsuits...
http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/files/advanced-multilevel-concepts-inc.-v.-bukstel1.pdf
getmoney214, nice info. Thanks for posting those two Posts.
thank you to getmoney214
Ed and VTMS shareholders are on cutting edge of legal precedence
this could really be a landmark case,
what happened here is common, but what is going on now in the courts is not.
I am concerned that vtms is not at full value,
what I would like to see is disengourgement of any shareholder or control person and restoration of the trading shell to its rightful status so new investors can get a fair look at ed's plan/
Jehu Hand Federal Judge Allows 5 SEC 10(b) And Fraud Claims to Proceed San Clemente, California
District Court Finds that Securities Exchange Act Covers Stock "Float" Manipulation
Posted on February 1, 2013 by Michael S. Gordon
Co-authored by Elizabeth D. Langdale.
In a self-described “precedent-setting” order, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania recently found that the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) can apply to a scheme aimed at gaining control over a corporation’s stock “float.” The District Court, considering a motion to dismiss a defendant’s amended counterclaims and third-party claims, was presented with the unique question of whether a violation of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b(5) can be committed by officers of a corporation, not by their misrepresentations to investors in connection with the sale of a corporation’s shares (as is usually alleged), but by the officers’ alleged scheme to manipulate the restricted nature of a company’s shares in order to gain control over the stock’s float and enrich themselves to the detriment of the corporation. The District Court found that the Exchange Act could cover such allegations, and reasoned that the US Supreme Court’s broad holdings enforcing Section 10(b) and Rule 10b(5) extended to a corporate officer’s scheme to manipulate the stock’s float, artificially inflate its share price through fraud on the market and reap substantial gains by selling off his shares while causing the corporation and its other shareholders to suffer loss. As such, the District Court denied the motion to dismiss defendants’ counterclaims, and held that, while this was a novel situation, it could not conclude on a Rule 12 motion that it would be legally impossible for defendants to satisfy a jury that the alleged scheme described in their counterclaims entitles them to relief.
Advanced Multilevel Concepts, Inc. et al. v. Edward Bukstel et al., Civil Action No. 11-3718 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 25, 2013).
This is becoming a long wait. no news, phone# not working, what will be next?
If you are an affiliate, employee, insider, or any person in possession of nonpublic material information about this company, please be advised that buying or selling this security may constitute trading "on the basis of" material nonpublic information prohibited under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 and 10b5-1 thereunder. Violators of these laws are subject to civil and criminal penalties.
What is insider trading?
Illegal insider trading refers generally to buying or selling a security, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence, while in possession of material, nonpublic information about the security.
Rule 10b5-1 provides that a person trades on the basis of material nonpublic information if that person is "aware" of the material nonpublic information at the time of the purchase or sale.
Affiliates, insiders, relatives, or other persons in possession of material information should use extreme caution when buying or selling securities on the basis of material information, particularly in securities where the company is not making adequate current information publicly available as a matter of practice.
I would Like to see where VSpice stands, Kevin D Good person, and Might have some people that might to Jump Back In, and take this Comapny to the next level
SEC Violations Stand in Court Order
Baylson, J. January 25, 2013
MEMORANDUM RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS
I. INTRODUCTION
The unique question presented in this securities fraud case is whether a violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b(5) can be committed by officers of a Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 1 of 23
2
corporation, not by their misrepresentations to investors in connection with the sale of the corporation’s shares, as is usually alleged, but by a scheme centered around manipulating the restricted nature of the company’s shares under SEC Rule 144, 17 C.F.R. § 230.144(i), in order to gain control over the stock’s “float” and enrich themselves at the detriment of the corporation.
From the pleadings, the battle of allegations between Plaintiffs and Defendants reveal disputes about sinister intent and financial motive, as well as possibly innocent acts and statements, that might serve well as the plot of an opera, perhaps not as deep or threatening as the intrigues between King Phillip II of Spain and his son, Don Carlos, over the fate of Flanders in the Sixteenth Century in Verdi’s opera. But the plot of an opera can be resolved by the librettist in three of four hours; this case, seventeen months ongoing and still at the stage of pleadings, must move into the second stage, of discovery, and hopefully for a shorter period.
As the Court previously denied the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF 8) by Order of August 27, 2012 (ECF 38), the Court must now also deny Plaintiffs’ and Third-Party Jehu Hand’s Motions to Dismiss Defendants’ Amended Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims. (ECF 50 & 51). The Court concludes that the Supreme Court’s broad holdings enforcing Section 10(b) and Rule 10b(5) in prior cases extends to a manipulative scheme by an officer of a corporation to gain control the stock’s float, artificially inflate its share price through fraud on the market, and reap substantial gains by selling off his shares while causing the corporation and its other shareholders to suffer losses.
II. FACTUAL &PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background per Allegations of Complaint, Amended Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 2 of 23
3
1. Edward Bukstel started VitaminSpice, LLC in 2008, in Pennsylvania. He raised money from local investors to develop a new commercial product, vitamin-infused spices. In 2009, he desired to take the LLC public. (Complaint ¶ 14-15).
2. Bukstel began discussions with Jehu Hand, a securities lawyer in California, in the summer of 2009. Bukstel was interested in consummating a reverse merger with Qualsec LLC, a company owned by Hand’s brother, Learned Hand. At the time of the reverse merger, Plaintiffs Able Direct Marketing, Inc. (“Able”) and Esthetics World, Inc. (“Esthetics”), were part of a group of noteholders in Qualsec, to whom the corporation owed $130,000. (Id. ¶ 16-17).
3. In August 2009, Bukstel travelled to California to meet with Jehu and Learned Hand, to discuss the reverse-merger. (Id. ¶ 18). It was agreed the merger would go forwards. Also during this trip, Qualsec shareholders and noteholders agreed to convert their debt in Qualsec into post-merger equity in Vitaminspice. (Id. ¶ 19).
4. On September 28, 2009, the reverse-merger was consummated. (Amended Counterclaims ¶ 17). There were 121 million new shares of VitaminSpice acquired – 21 million shares acquired by the Qualsec shareholders and noteholders, and 100 million shares acquired by VitaminSpice investors, including Bukstel and Plaintiff International Business Development, Inc. (“IDB”). (Complaint ¶ 23). Plaintiff Advanced Multilevel Concepts, Inc. (“Advanced”) acquired its shares in VitaminSpice from shareholders in the Qualsec group. (Id.). The public company was renamed VitaminSpice and VitaminSpice, LLC became the wholly-owned subsidiary. (Id.).
5. Also on September 28, 2009 Hand allegedly issued a false “Corporate Resolution” of the Qualsec investors; sent an “Opinion Letter” to a transfer agent, Stalt, Inc., Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 3 of 23
4
stating falsely that VitaminSpice was not and never had been a shell company; and signed another allegedly false “Seller’s Representation Letter.” (Amended Counterclaims ¶¶ 17-20, 24).
6. At some point throughout these transactions, Jehu Hand became in-house counsel of VitaminSpice. (See id. ¶ 10).
7. In January 2010, Hand allegedly commissioned the publication of two press releases about VitaminSpice, containing false information. The press releases inflated the company’s share price. From January 14, 2010 through February 1, 2010, Hand allegedly engaged in massive sales and purchases of VitaminSpice shares through a “pump and dump” scheme. (Id. ¶¶ 48-52).
8. On March 24, 2010, Hand sent an email to Bukstel and the VitaminSpice Board of Directors, advising them that under [SEC] Rule 144(i), “if the company was a ‘shell’ at any time in its history (as this company was for about two months prior to the merger) . . . the restricted shares issued on the merger cannot use Rule 144 until 1 year after the form 10 . . . has been filed.” (Id. ¶ 30). In other words, Hand related that because VitaminSpice had been a shell prior to the merger, Rule 144(i) prevented legitimate VitaminSpice shareholders from trading their shares. This both stopped VitaminSpice investors from trading their shares, and dissuaded the VitaminSpice Board from issuing additional shares, which would have reduced the float controlled by Hand. (Id. ¶ 29). Allegedly, Hand was transmitting this information at the same time he was orchestrating his scheme to flood the market with free trading shares issued in the name of his shell companies, relatives, friends, and fictional persons. (Id. ¶ 30).
10. In May 2010, Hand allegedly engaged in another pump-and-dump operation, involving the commission and publication of false press releases. (Id. ¶¶ 54-55).
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 4 of 23
5
11. On July 5, 2010, Hand reported to VitaminSpice’s Board of Directors that Bukstel had been derelict in his duties as CEO – after months of allegedly observing that Bukstel had merged company accounts with his personal accounts, had failed to impose internal controls, and had failed to file reports in a timely fashion, Hand brought this information to the Board of Directors. (Complaint ¶¶ 25-35).
12. On July 6, 2010, Hand was terminated as VitaminSpice’s counsel. (Id. ¶ 36).
13. On July 12, 2010, Bukstel imposed a “stop order” on the shares held by Plaintiffs (e.g., Advanced, Able, Esthetics, and IDB) by directing Stalt, the transfer agent, not to allow their shares to be traded. (Id. ¶¶ 37, 40).
14. In August 2010, Bukstel allegedly caused VitaminSpice to issue 7.32 backdated shares of VitaminSpice stock to Bukstel’s “confederates,” for no consideration to the company. (Id. ¶ 59). This diluted the value of Plaintiffs’ holdings in VitaminSpice. (Id. ¶ 74).
15. At the conclusion of the Complaint, and the Amended Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims, these pleadings relate the injuries suffered by the respective parties, including damages and other matters, and seek recovery from the opposing party or parties.
B. Procedural Background
On June 8, 2011, Plaintiffs, investors in VitaminSpice, Inc.,1 filed this case against VitaminSpice, its CEO Edward Bukstel, its director Dr. Richard Seelig, and Does 1-30, for breach of the U.C.C., conversion, breach of the duty of care, breach of the duty of loyalty, and securities fraud. (ECF 1). Most of the causes of action named VitaminSpice and Bukstel. Plaintiffs alleged Bukstel “initiated a systematic effort to block Plaintiff shareholders from
1 The original Plaintiffs in this action were the corporations Advanced, Able, Esthetics, IDB, and two individuals, Ken Nail and Irv Pyun. (ECF 1). Ken Nail and Irv Pyun filed a motion for voluntary dismissal on December 10, 2012. (ECF 63). The motion was granted and their claims were dismissed without prejudice. (ECF 64)/
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 5 of 23
6
selling their holdings” in VitaminSpice, thereby harming Plaintiffs when the price at which the shares were trading subsequently plummeted. (Id. ¶¶ 37-39, 46-47). They contended Bukstel fraudulently issued 7.32 million backdated shares of company stock “to his confederates for no consideration to the Company,” to inflate the trading price. (Id. ¶¶ 58-59). This diluted Plaintiffs’ holdings in the company by 5% (id. ¶ 66), and also enabled Bukstel’s “confederates” to sell their shares into the market at artificial prices and “thereby r[eap] illicit gains at the expense of Plaintiffs and the investing public” (id. ¶ 60).
On July 22, 2011, Bukstel and VitaminSpice filed an Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims, and Third-Party Claim, with the third-party being Jehu Hand, VitaminSpice’s former counsel. (ECF 9).2 In brief, the Counterclaims and Third-Party Claim alleged that Plaintiffs and Hand violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b(5), and that Plaintiffs and Hand committed common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty, when they misrepresented to Bukstel and VitaminSpice at the time of the reverse-merger that Plaintiffs were bonafide independent corporations, whereas they were in fact “shell companies” and “alter-egos” controlled by Hand. (Id. ¶¶ 13, 16-25). Additionally, the Counterclaims alleged Hand committed securities fraud and common law fraud when he managed to gain control of “a substantial part of the float of VitaminSpice shares” through his command over Plaintiffs, and used that control to make trades that enriched himself and harmed Defendants. (Id. ¶¶ 24-37). On August 11 and September 2, 2011, Plaintiffs and Third-Party Defendant Hand filed Motions to Dismiss Defendants’ Counterclaims and Third-Party Claim for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted. (ECF 16 & 25).
2 Defendants’ Counterclaims were filed against Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Advanced, Able, Esthetics, and IDB. (ECF 9). The Amended Counterclaims, presently under consideration, no longer list IDB as a Counter-Defendant. (ECF 47).
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 6 of 23
7
Defendants simultaneously filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint or Disqualify Plaintiffs’ Counsel for Attorney Misconduct. (ECF 8). They contended Hand, who was currently serving as counsel for Plaintiffs, had filed the case against his former client, VitaminSpice, in violation of established duties of professional conduct. As a result, the entire case should be dismissed or Hand should be removed as Plaintiffs’ counsel. (Id. ¶ 1). Plaintiffs filed a Response on August 5, 2011. (ECF 14).
On September 2, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Removal to Bankruptcy Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1452(a) & 1334(b). (ECF 26). The Court issued an Order on September 13, 2011, staying all proceedings and placing the case in civil suspense, pending the outcome in Bankruptcy Court. (ECF 28).
The case was taken out of civil suspense on April 20, 2012, after the Bankruptcy Court dismissed it for various reasons not pertinent here. By July 31, 2012, Hand was no longer counsel to Plaintiffs – they had retained new counsel, Peter Sheridan, Esquire. (ECF 35). Accordingly, this Court entered an Order dated August 27, 2012 (ECF 38), denying Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint or Disqualify Plaintiffs’ Counsel (ECF 8).
The Court also required the parties to begin conferring on discovery matters. It issued a Scheduling Order, directing Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs’ and Hand’s Motions to Dismiss the Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims, and setting a date for oral argument. (ECF 37). Defendants filed a Response on September 4, 2012. (ECF 39) and Plaintiffs filed a Reply on September 14, 2012. (ECF 40). Oral argument was held on September 20, 2012. (ECF 43).
At the argument, the Court noted the Counterclaims lacked allegations of specific purchases or sales of securities by Plaintiffs and Hand which caused losses to Defendants, and
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 7 of 23
8
that such allegations are necessary in order to plead a claim under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act with sufficient particularity. (Id.). The Court issued an Order granting the motion to dismiss the Counterclaims without prejudice, entitling Defendants the opportunity to file amended counterclaims and third-party claims. (ECF 44).
On October 11, 2012, Defendants Bukstel and VitaminSpice filed Amended Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims, with the third-party claims again being filed against Hand, former attorney for VitaminSpice. (ECF 46 & 47). Defendants included seven causes of action against Plaintiffs and Hand in the amended pleading, alleging: federal securities fraud in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b(5) (Counts I, II, III and IV), common law fraud (Count V), negligent misrepresentation (Count VI), and breach of fiduciary duty (Count VIII). The Amended Counterclaims, like the original Counterclaims, averred that Plaintiffs and Hand misled Bukstel and VitaminSpice at the time of the reverse-merger by concealing Hand’s true control and command over Plaintiffs. (ECF 46, ¶¶ 87-93). The Counterclaims also specified in greater detail how Hand allegedly gained control over the float of VitaminSpice’s shares, by making misleading and contradictory representations to VitaminSpice investors, its Board of Directors, and its transfer agent. (Id. ¶¶ 29-31). According to Defendants, Hand told “legitimate VitaminSpice investors” they were restricted from trading their shares pursuant to SEC Rule 144(i) while he told the transfer agent the exact opposite information; this enabled him to gain control over VitaminSpice’s float by freely trading the shares held by Plaintiffs. (Id. ¶¶ 29-31, 36-41). Finally, the Counterclaims also detail “pump-and-dump” schemes orchestrated by Hand, during which he would release false information
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 8 of 23
9
about VitaminSpice to the market and drive up its share price, and then sell off the shares he controlled and reap substantial gains. (Id. ¶¶ 48-52, 54-56).
On October 25 and November 1, 2012, Plaintiffs and Hand each filed Motions to Dismiss, contending Defendants failed to state a claim for their first six causes of action. (ECF 50 & 52). Plaintiffs and Hand each attached new exhibits to their filings.3 Defendants filed a Response on November 8, 2012 (ECF 54), and Plaintiffs and Hand filed Replies on November 15 and November 19, 2012 (ECF 57 & 59).
III. LEGAL STANDARDS
A. Motions to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)
To survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), a complaint must contain sufficient factual allegations that “state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). A complaint will satisfy this threshold test for facial plausibility if “the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id. at 678. Additionally, when the facts alleged equally support an “obvious alternative explanation” for what transpired, the plaintiff will not cross the plausibility threshold. Id. at 1951-52. “A
3 The new exhibits submitted by Plaintiffs were: the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, entered into by VitaminSpice in September 2009 (Exhibit 1); a Marketwire article, published on November 8, 2010, about VitaminSpice’s consummation of a transaction that will bring its product into new retail stores (Exhibit 2); VitaminSpice’s balance sheet, as of September 30, 2011 (Exhibit 3); a press release by VitaminSpice, published on November 15, 2010 (Exhibit 4); a “Statement of Operations” of VitaminSpice, as of September 30, 2011 (Exhibit 5); a press release by VitaminSpice, published on November 17, 2010 (Exhibit 6); a Marketwire article, published on March 9, 2011, reporting that VitaminSpice relieved a $5 million order for its products (Exhibit 7); a Complaint filed by Advanced, Able and Esthetics against VitaminSpice, on November 9, 2010, in the Superior Court for the State of California (Exhibit 8); and an audit report by the Blackwing Group of Qualsec, as of December 31, 2008 (Exhibit 9). (See ECF 50). Hand attached an identical set of exhibits to his Motion to Dismiss. (See ECF 52). Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 9 of 23
10
complaint which pleads facts ‘merely consistent with a defendant’s liability, [] stops short of the line between possibility and plausibility of entitlement to relief.’” Burtch v. Milberg Factors, Inc., 662 F.3d 212, 221 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678).
When presented with a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), a district court should conduct a two part analysis. First, it should separate the factual and legal elements of a claim and accept all of the well-pleaded facts as true. Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). Second, the court should determine whether the factual allegations are sufficient to show that the plaintiff has a “plausible claim for relief.” Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside, 578 F.3d 203, 210-11 (3d Cir. 2009). See generally Malleus v. George, 641 F.3d 560, 563 (3d Cir. 2011) (holding that in reviewing Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss, the court first “review[s] the complaint to strike conclusory allegations” and then evaluates whether the “well-pleaded components of the complaint” establish “the elements of the claim”).
When parties attach new factual averments to a Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), this may have the effect of converting the motion to one for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(d) provides: “If, on a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) or 12(c), matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under Rule 56. All parties must be given a reasonable opportunity to present all the material that is pertinent to the motion.” However, Rule 12(d) is not triggered for undisputedly authentic documents on which the plaintiff’s claims are based. Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. v. White Consol. Indus., Inc., 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir. 1993) (“[A] court may consider an undisputedly authentic document that a defendant attaches as an exhibit to a motion to dismiss if the plaintiff's claims are based on the document.); see also U.S. Express Lines, Ltd. v. Higgins,
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 10 of 23
11
281 F.3d 383, 388 (3d Cir. 2002) (“Although a district court may not consider matters extraneous to the pleadings, a document integral to or explicitly relied upon in the complaint may be considered without converting the motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment.”).
The exhibits, attached by Plaintiffs to their motion to dismiss the amended counterclaims, are described in FN 3. However, the Court will not consider the contents of these exhibits at this time. Accordingly, disposition of this motion proceeds under Rule 12(b)(6) rather than 12(d).
B. Pleading Standards for Fraud Cases
Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b) imposes a “heightened pleading standar[d]” on plaintiffs bringing a cause of action for fraud. See In re Ins. Brokerage Antitrust Litig., 618 F.3d 300, 347 n.50 (3d Cir. 2010). The Rule provides: “In alleging fraud or mistake, a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake. Malice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person’s mind may be alleged generally.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b). To comply with Rule 9(b), a plaintiff must “allege the time, place, and content of the alleged misrepresentation on which he or she relied; the fraudulent scheme; the fraudulent intent of the defendants; and the injury resulting from the fraud.” Coffey v. Foamex L.P., 2 F.3d 157, 161-62 (6th Cir. 1993). Rule 9(b) applies to “all claims based on fraud,” including claims that arise under statutes but involve the commission of fraudulent activity. See In re Ins. Brokerage Antitrust Litig., 618 F.3d at 347 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted) (holding Rule 9(b) applied in an action brought under the Sherman Act).
C. Elements of the Causes of Action in the Amended Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims
The Amended Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims charge Plaintiffs and Hand with committing: (1) federal securities fraud; (2) common law fraud; (3) negligent misrepresentation;
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 11 of 23
12
and (4) breach of fiduciary duty. Defendants included four causes of action related to securities fraud, contending Plaintiffs and Hand ran afoul of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b(5) by making false statements to secure free trading shares (Count I), by exerting undisclosed control over the Plaintiff-companies (Count II), by engaging in pump and dump schemes (Count III), and by controlling the “float” of VitaminSpice’s securities to make unlawful stock sales (Count IV). Defendants moved to dismiss the causes of action for securities fraud, common law fraud, and negligent representation. The elements of those causes of action are set forth below.
1. Securities Fraud
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and its corresponding regulations prohibit fraud in connection with the sale or purchase of securities. See 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b); 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5(b). Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act outlaws the “use or employ[ment of] . . . any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of such rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe,” “in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.” 15 U.S.C. § 78j. Rule 10(b)-5, promulgated by the SEC pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Act, provides: “It shall be unlawful for any person . . . [t]o make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact . . . in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.” 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5(b).
To pursue a private right of action under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act or under Rule 10b(5), a plaintiff must allege: (1) a material misrepresentation or omission; (2) made with scienter; (3) in connection with the purchase or sale of a security; (4) reliance on the misrepresentation or omission; (5) economic loss; and (6) a causal connection between the Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 12 of 23
13
material misrepresentation or omission and the loss. See In re Aetna, Inc. Sec. Litig., 617 F.3d 272, 277 (3d Cir. 2010). Additionally, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1996 (PSLRA), 109 Stat. 737, “imposes two exacting and distinct pleading requirements for securities fraud actions.” In re Aetna, 617 F.3d at 277. First, the PSLRA requires a complaint to “specify each statement alleged to have been misleading, the reason or reasons why the statement is misleading, and, if an allegation regarding the statement or omission is made on information and belief, the complaint shall state with particularity all facts on which that belief is formed.” 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(1). Second, a complaint must “state with particularity facts giving rise to a strong inference that the defendant acted with the requirement state of mind.” Id. § 78u-4(b)(2).
If a plaintiff fails to allege one of the six elements of federal securities fraud in his or her complaint, or fails to allege with specificity the material misrepresentation or scienter element, dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) is proper. Dura Pharms., Inc. v. Broudo, 544 U.S. 336, 346 (2005) (“Our holding about plaintiffs’ need to prove proximate causation and economic loss leads us also to conclude that the plaintiffs’ complaint here failed adequately to allege these requirements.”); Barnard v. Verizon Commc’ns, Inc., 451 Fed. Appx. 80, 85 (3d Cir. 2011) (“The second amended complaint also contains no allegations from which reliance and economic loss can be established because there is no indication as to how, when, or why Appellants purchased or sold Idearc stock. There is thus no way to ascertain how any misrepresentation or omission impacted Appellants' decisions to purchase or sell securities. Accordingly, the District Court appropriately dismissed Appellants' securities fraud claim.”).
2. Common Law Fraud
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 13 of 23
14
The elements of a cause of action for common law fraud under Pennsylvania law are: (1) a representation; (2) material to the transaction at hand; (3) made falsely, with knowledge as to its falsity or recklessness as to whether it is false or true; (4) with the intent of misleading another; (5) justifiable reliance on the misrepresentation; and (6) injury that was proximately caused by the reliance. Bortz v. Noon, 729 A.2d 555, 499 (Pa. 1999); Gibbs v. Ernst, 647 A.2d 882, 889 (Pa. 1994). A plaintiff must plead each element with particularity to state a viable claim to fraud. E.g. Huddleston v. Infertility Ctr. of Am., Inc., 700 A.2d 453, 461 (Pa. Super. 1997).
3. Negligent Misrepresentation
The elements of a cause of action for negligent misrepresentation under Pennsylvania law are: (1) a misrepresentation of a material fact; (2) made under circumstances in which the misrepresented ought to have known of the falsity; (3) which an intent to induct another to act; and (4) which results in an injury to a party acting in justifiable reliance on the misrepresentation. Bortz, 729 A.2d at 500. “The elements of negligence misrepresentation differ from intentional misrepresentation [i.e., common law fraud] in that the misrepresentation must concern a material fact and the speaker need not know his or her words are untrue, but must have failed to make a reasonable investigation of the truth of these words. Moreover, like in any action in negligence, there must be an existence of a duty owed by one party to another.” Id. at 501. IV. THE PARTIES’ CONTENTIONS
A. Securities Fraud Claims
Plaintiffs move to dismiss the four causes of action in Defendants’ Amended Counterclaims related to securities fraud because they contend Defendants pleaded “none” of the Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 14 of 23
15
six elements of a private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b(5) with sufficient particularity. The “most obvious” deficiencies, Plaintiffs assert, are the failure to plead reliance, a connection between the misrepresentations and the purchase or sale of a security, and loss causation. (Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims, at 12) (ECF 50).
As to reliance, Plaintiffs highlight two shortcomings in the amended pleadings. First, they note that Defendants mention only one purchase or sale of a security in the Amended Counterclaims: the purchase by Edward Bukstel of shares of VitaminSpice stock on September 28, 2009. Accordingly, all securities fraud claims related to conduct by Hand after September 28, 2009 must be dismissed, Plaintiffs argue, because Defendants cannot possibly plead reliance during a time when they undertook no securities transactions.
Second, Plaintiffs contend that reliance on Hand’s misrepresentations, even for Bukstel’s September 28, 2009 transaction, was not alleged. The Amended Counterclaims do refer to misstatements by Hand made on or prior to September 28, 2009 – e.g., Hand’s forging of a Corporate Resolution by the Board of Directors at Qualsec, Hand’s false representations in an Opinion Letter to the transfer agent, Stalt – but the pleadings also state that neither Bukstel nor VitaminSpice were aware of these misstatements. (See Amended Counterclaims, ¶¶ 17, 20) (ECF 46) (stating Hand’s execution of the Corporate Resolution was “unbeknownst to VitaminSpice and Bukstel” and “[n]either VitaminSpice nor Bukstel were aware of the false ‘Opinion Letter’ to Stalt”).
Defendants cannot plead reliance by Bukstel, Plaintiffs argue, if they simultaneously disavow that Bukstel was aware of Hand’s misrepresentations. Accordingly, all securities fraud claims, both those pertaining to pre-September 28, 2009 conduct and post-September 28, 2009
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 15 of 23
16
conduct, should be dismissed, because Defendants have not pled reliance on any act or omission by Hand during those times in their undertaking of a security transaction.
4
As to the “connection” element of a Section 10(b) or Rule 10b(5) claim, Plaintiffs argue the amended pleadings are deficient as to their allegations that Hand committed securities fraud when he stated that VitaminSpice was not a shell company. Count I charges Hand with violating Section 10(b) and Rule 10b(5) when he told Stalt, the transfer agent, that VitaminSpice “is not – and never was – a shell company.” (Amended Counterclaim ¶ 79) (ECF 46). Defendants contend that this misstatement, made on multiple occasions, is what allowed Hand to freely trade VitaminSpice shares in violation of SEC rules. (Id. ¶¶ 20, 39, 44, 78-79). Plaintiffs nonetheless argue for dismissal because they claim that even if Hand made false representations about VitaminSpice’s shell status, such were not statements “in connection with” the purchase or sale of a security. The contend only statements related to the “value of the securities bought or sold” are deemed to be “in connection” with the purchase or sale of a security and cite Bissell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 973 F. Supp. 237, 242 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), for support.
Third, Plaintiffs argue for dismissal of the securities fraud claims because they argue Defendants failed to plead loss causation. “[E]ven drawing every reasonable inference in favor of Counter Plaintiffs’ exceedingly vague allegations, it remains virtually impossible to ascertain a causal link between damages to Bukstel (none are alleged against the Company) and an act or
4 Hand argues that Defendants did not plead reliance for Bukstel’s Sep 28, 2009 transaction because the Amended Counterclaims contain no factual averments that Bukstel relied on representations about Qualsec or its shareholders when he decided to purchase VitaminSpice stock. Meanwhile, a clause in the reverse-merger agreement explicitly stated that no other representations except those in the agreement were considered. The agreement attached a schedule listing how 100 million shares of VitaminSpice shares would be allocated to new investors (including Bukstel and Plaintiff IDB), but there was no specification of how the remaining 21 million shares for the Qualsec investors would be allocated. Thus, Hand argues, the distribution of the 21 million shares issued to Qualsen was not something Bukstel, or anyone involved in the reverse-merged agreement, relied upon.
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 16 of 23
17
omission on the part of Counter Defendants.” (Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims, at 17) (ECF 50). The Amended Counterclaims describe an intricate stock manipulation scheme by Hand, whereby he gained control of a substantial portion of VitaminSpice’s shares, released false information to the market about VitaminSpice’s business prospects, and then sold Vitaminspice shares at inflated prices to reap substantial gains, causing VitaminSpice’s share price to collapse shortly thereafter. But Plaintiffs argue no loss causation to VitaminSpice and Bukstel was properly averred because the diminution to VitaminSpice’s stock price allegedly caused by Hand was not a “harm” to the Defendant company, but only to its investors. Additionally, they claim that because there is an equally likely, alternative explanation for any loss causation suffered by Bukstel when the share price fell, i.e., mismanagement by the company’s directors, the pleadings are deficient under Iqbal. (Id. at 17-19).
B. Common Law Fraud and Negligent Misrepresentation Claims
Plaintiffs’ arguments for dismissal of the common law fraud and negligent misrepresentation claims hinge on a failure to plead reliance – they contend Defendants did not aver how any of the alleged misrepresentations by Hand were relied upon by Bukstel or VitaminSpice in the sale or purchase of a security.
V. ANALYSIS
After careful consideration, the Court will deny Plaintiffs’ Motions to Dismiss the Amended Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims.
A. Count I (Securities Fraud for False Statements to Secure Free-Trading Shares)
Although most of the statements made by Hand in order to “secure free-trading shares” of VitaminSpice were made to the transfer agent, Stalt, and so were relied upon by Stalt rather than Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 17 of 23
18
by Defendants, there are other allegations of misrepresentations made by Hand directly to Bukstel and to VitaminSpice which permitted Hand to gain control over the “float” of the stock once he had secured the free-trading shares. (See Amended Counterclaims ¶¶ 29-30). Further, the essence of Count I is that Hand perpetrated a broad scheme, on behalf of himself and Plaintiffs, to gain control of VitaminSpice’s stock price by making false and fraudulent acts and representations. These misrepresentations were made to Stalt, to investors in the general market, to members of the Board of Directors, and to Bukstel, and together, they allegedly caused significant harm to Defendants. It is true, as this Court noted in its earlier Order of September 20, 2012, that the subject of Defendants’ securities-fraud counterclaims and third-party claims against Plaintiffs and Hand are in fact securities Defendants themselves issued. The Court agrees this is a novel situation, but cannot necessarily conclude, on a Rule 12 motion considering the totality of allegations, construed in the light most favorable to Defendants, that it would be legally impossible for Defendants to satisfy a jury that this scheme entitles them to relief.
B. Counts II, III, IV (Remaining Securities Fraud Claims)
First, Count II alleges securities fraud in connection with Hand’s misrepresentations of his control over Plaintiff-companies. The Amended Counterclaims aver that Hand “misrepresented to Bukstel and VitaminSpice that [the Qualsec noteholders and shareholders] were independent and viable entities,” and that Bukstel and VitaminSpice “reasonably relied on the concealments and misrepresentations [when] . . . retaining Hand, agreeing to proceed with the reverse merger, [and] allowing Hand to engineer the various transactions in which Counter-Defendants secured their shares of VitaminSpice stock.” (Amended Complaint, ¶¶ 87, 91-92). These allegations satisfy the pleading requirements under Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 9(b) because Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 18 of 23
19
they describe a material misrepresentation by Hand (about the independence of the Qualsec investor group), undertaken with scienter, connected to the sale or purchase of a security (namely, connected to Bukstel’s decision to purchase VitaminSpice shares at the reverse-merger transaction), relied upon by Defendant (namely, relied on by Bukstel), which caused an economic loss to Defendant (namely, which caused losses to Bukstel when VitaminSpice’s share later collapsed). Had Bukstel known the truth about Hand’s control of the Qualsec group, it is possible he would have decided not to purchase VitaminSpice stock in September 2009 – because he might not have wanted to invest in a company in which 17% of the outstanding shares were controlled by the same individual.
Although Plaintiffs are correct that Defendants disavowed Bukstel’s knowledge of certain pre-September 2009 statements by Hand (paragraphs 17 and 20 of the Amended Counterclaims state that Bukstel and VitaminSpice had no knowledge of Hand’s false Opinion Letter issued to Stalt or the false Corporate Resolution he drafted for the Qualsec group), reliance can be assumed when an individual withholds material information. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States, 406 U.S. 128, 153-54 (1978) (holding “if there is an omission of a material fact by one with a duty to disclose, the investor to whom the duty was owed need not provide specific proof of reliance”).
Moreover, while the Court cannot cite a case where plaintiffs brought a Section 10(b) or Rule 10b(5) action on account of misstatements by an insider that were made to a future-CEO during a reverse-merger negotiation (and that influenced the CEO to buy shares in the company), the Supreme Court has held more generally that statements made during pre-merger negotiations are cognizable in Rule 10b(5) actions, when relied on by public shareholders. Basic Inc. v.
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 19 of 23
20
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 236 (1988) (“We therefore find no valid justification for artificially excluding from the definition of materiality information concerning merger discussions, which would otherwise be considered significant to the trading decision of a reasonable investor, merely because agreement-in-principle as to price and structure has not yet been reached by the parties or their representatives.”).
Count III charges Hand with securities fraud in connection with his “pump and dump” schemes. Defendants aver that Hand made “false statements and material omissions” in press releases “which were intended to – and did – artificially inflate the price of VitaminSpice stock.” (Amended Counterclaims ¶ 96). “Hand then dumped the stock by unloading millions of shares over which he exercised control, causing the stock price to plummet far below the value at which Bukstel acquired the stock in connection with the reverse merger.” (Id. ¶ 96).
Defendants have satisfied the pleading requirements for this Count because they have alleged a misrepresentation (Hand’s commissioned press releases), made with scienter, in connection with the sale or purchase of a security (that is, the purchase of VitaminSpice shares by investors in the general market), relied on (that is, relied on by the general investors), and which caused losses to plaintiffs (that is, losses to Bukstel, when his share price plummeted after the pump-and-dump schemes were carried through, and arguably losses to the corporation, when its share price collapsed and market reputation fell). An issue is whether the “connection” and “reliance” elements of a Section 10(b) or Rule 10b(5) action can be satisfied when entities other than the plaintiffs (here, entities other than counter-plaintiffs Bukstel and VitaminSpice) are the ones who executed the purchases or sales of securities in reliance upon the defendant’s misrepresentations. In the typical Section 10(b) or 10b(5) case, the plaintiff is the individual Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 20 of 23
21
who makes a stock purchase or sale in reliance on misleading or false statements by the defendant (usually the company or its Board of Directors). This case is unique, because the company and its CEO are counter-suing a third-party (Hand) for misrepresentations which induced other investors, in the general market, to buy and then sell off its stock. The key question is whether the “connection” and “reliance” elements can be satisfied when the securities transactions at issue were conducted by entities other than the plaintiff. The Court has not found any case law specifically confronting or resolving this question. It has, however, found case law suggesting the “in connection with” and “reliance” elements should not be read so narrowly as to preclude novel securities fraud actions that are consistent with the purpose of Section 10(b). United States v. O’Hagan, 521 U.S. 642 (1997) (holding the “in connection with” element is satisfied when an individual uses confidential information to purchase securities “even though the person or entity defrauded is not the other party to the trade, but is, instead, the source of the nonpublic information” because the defendant “deceives the source of the information and simultaneously harms members of the investing public” and “an animating purpose of the Exchange Act [is] to insure honest securities markets and thereby promote investor confidence”); Sante Fe Indus., Inc. v. Green, 430 U.S. 462, 473-74 (holding the controlling test for whether a complaint states a cause of action under Rule 10b(5) is whether “the conduct alleged can be fairly viewed as ‘manipulative or deceptive’”); Superintendent of Ins. v. Bankers Life & Cas. Co., 404 U.S. 6, 12-13 (1971) (holding fraud “in connection with” a purchase or sale of securities has an expansive meaning and occurs as long as there is “an injury as a result of deceptive practices touching [the purchase or] sale of securities”). Assuming connection and reliance can be satisfied by proof of securities transactions by persons other than plaintiffs but Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 21 of 23
22
which nonetheless harm plaintiffs, who are buyers or issuers of securities, Count III is sufficiently averred: it describes a pump-and-dump scheme orchestrated by Hand, which caused VitaminSpice’s share price to soar and then plummet when investors in the market made trades based upon his misrepresentations, and which caused losses to general investors as well as to Defendants who had earlier purchased and/or issued those securities. Cf. Blue Ship Stamps v. Major Drug Stores, 421 U.S. 723, 731 (1975) (holding “the plaintiff class for purposes of s 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 private damage actions is limited to purchasers and sellers of securities”). These factors may also satisfy the requirement of the loss causation. See In re Cigna Corp. Sec. Litig., 2005 WL 3536212 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 23, 2005).
Count IV alleges securities fraud by Hand through his control over the float of VitaminSpice’s stock and his unlawful participation in stock sales. The Amended Counterclaim states: “Hand could and did manipulate the price of VitaminSpice stock by giving the false impression of an active market and artificially inflating the price thereof. As alleged above, the drop in the price of VitaminSpice stock was caused by the winding down of the price-manipulation and pump-and-dump scheme engaged in by Hand.” (Amended Counterclaim ¶ 105). This cause of action substantively mirrors that in Count III, so again the Court must decide: can the “connection” and “reliance” elements of a Section 10(b) or Rule 10b(5) action be satisfied when the securities transactions at issue were performed by parties other than the plaintiffs (e.g., by investors in the general market), but nonetheless caused harm to the plaintiffs? Finding no authority either way, the Court holds in the affirmative, and sustains Count IV as it did for Count III.
C. Counts V and VI (common law fraud and negligent misrepresentation)
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 22 of 23
23
Defendants have pled sufficient facts to state claims of fraud and negligent misrepresentation by Hand during the negotiation and consummation of reverse merger agreement. Defendants allege that Hand failed to disclose the truth about the Qualsec investors’ identities. They claim he invented fake identities and addresses for directors in those companies, issued a fake Corporate Resolution of the Qualsec Board, and withheld information about his true control over those companies from Bukstel and VitaminSpice. (Amended Complaint ¶¶ 19, 20). Bukstel and VitaminSpice relied on Hand’s misrepresentations in consummating the reverse merger on September 28, 2009, and both parties suffered losses (the company, to its share price and market value, and Bukstel, to his holdings in VitaminSpice) when Hand used his position of control over 17% of VitaminSpice’s shares to consummate a pump and dump scheme. These are sufficient allegations of common law fraud and negligent misrepresentation.
***
For the forgoing reasons, Defendant and Third-Party Hand’s Motions to Dismiss the Amended Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims are denied. An appropriate Order follows.
O:\CIVIL 11\11-3718 Advanced Multilevel v Bukstel\11-3718.Memo on MTD Counterclaims- Final.doc
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 67 Filed 01/25/13 Page 23 of 23
SEC Violations in Amended Complaint
Pursuant to the Court’s Order of September 20, 2012, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8, 12, 13, 18, and
20, and other governing rules and case law, Defendants, EDWARD BUKSTEL (“Bukstel”) and
VITAMINSPICE, INC. (“VitaminSpice”), by and through their attorneys, and for their Amended
Counterclaims and Third-Party Complaint against Counter-Defendants Advanced Multilevel
Concepts, Inc. (“Advanced”), Able Direct Marketing, Inc. (“Able”), Esthetics World, Inc.
(“Esthetics”), and Third Party Defendant Jehu Hand (“Hand”), hereby allege as follows:
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 1 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
4823-7140-0465.1
SUMMARY OF CASE
These Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims are based on a stock-manipulation scheme
developed, implemented and orchestrated by VitaminSpice’s former counsel Hand through the
use of his shell companies including Counter-Defendants. After engineering the reverse merger
that created VitaminSpice, Hand seized control over much of the float of VitaminSpice freetrading
shares by making false statements in violation of established securities laws and SEC
rules. At the same time, Hand took actions to prevent Bukstel and legitimate VitaminSpice
shareholders from trading their shares.
After locking up a substantial part of the float of VitaminSpice stock, Hand engaged in
manipulative trading practices and embarked upon a pump-and-dump scheme based on false
statements that artificially inflated the price of VitaminSpice stock. Then Hand dumped the stock
and crashed its price to levels from which it has never recovered, causing substantial damage to
Bukstel and other VitaminSpice shareholders.
Hand’s misconduct violates numerous laws, as well as established fiduciary duties that
preclude such self-serving and unlawful profiteering at the expense of clients and their
shareholders. This Court should hold Hand liable for all of those illegalities, and preserve the
integrity of the securities laws that Hand believes he can flout at will.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. Bukstel is a Pennsylvania citizen with his residence and domicile in the State of
Pennsylvania. Bukstel has been a VitaminSpice shareholder since its inception on September 28,
2009, when he acquired 42 million shares, which he has held from that date to the present.
2. VitaminSpice is a Wyoming corporation with its principal place of business in the
State of Pennsylvania.
3. Hand is a California citizen with his residence and domicile in the State of
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 2 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
4823-7140-0465.1
California.
4. Advanced is a Nevada corporation with its principal place of business in the State
of Nevada. Advanced is Hand’s alter-ego, as alleged further below, and uses Hand’s California
address as an office.
5. Able is a Wyoming corporation with its principal place of business in the State of
Wyoming. Able is Hand’s alter-ego, as alleged further below, and uses Hand’s California address
as an office.
6. Esthetics is a Wyoming corporation with its principal place of business in the State
of Wyoming. Esthetics is Hand’s alter-ego, as alleged further below, and uses Hand’s California
address as an office.
7. International is a California corporation with its principal place of business in the
State of California. International is Hand’s alter-ego, as alleged further below, and uses Hand’s
California address as an office.
8. The Court has jurisdiction over these Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, in that this action arises under the laws of the United States. The
Court also has pendent and ancillary jurisdiction over these Counterclaims and Third-Party
Claims.
9. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Hand and Counter-Defendants, who have
engaged in continuous and systematic contacts with the State of Pennsylvania, have purposefully
availed themselves of the benefits and the laws and commerce of the State of Pennsylvania, and
have committed wrongful and tortious activities, including those giving rise to these
Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims, in the State of Pennsylvania. Hand and Counter-
Defendants also have consented to the jurisdiction of the State of Pennsylvania by filing a civil
action here.
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 3 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
4823-7140-0465.1
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
10. Hand is a California-based attorney. He became VitaminSpice’s counsel in June
2009. From the time of his engagement until his termination in July 2010, Hand represented
VitaminSpice in connection with all aspects of VitaminSpice’s operations.
11. In January 2010, Hand also became an officer in VitaminSpice. Hand served in
that capacity until his termination in July 2010.
12. Shortly after he became VitaminSpice’s corporate counsel, Hand developed and
engineered a plan to profit unlawfully from the sale of VitaminSpice stock through unlawful
conduct including: (a) seizing control over a substantial number of shares of VitaminSpice’s stock
issued to purported stockholders over which Hand exercised control; (b) making false statements
and concealing material information in order to seize and maintain his control over VitaminSpice
stock; and (c) implementing a pump-and-dump scheme to profit from the sale of VitaminSpice
stock by making false statements in press releases and elsewhere that artificially inflated the price
of VitaminSpice stock such that Hand was able to accomplish his scheme and profit therefrom.
Hand Engineered the VitaminSpice Reverse Merger To Seize Control Over Substantial
Amounts Of VitaminSpice Stock Held By Counter-Defendants And Others.
13. Hand’s plan involved acquiring VitaminSpice’s stock through the use of his shell
companies – Counter-Defendants – which Hand treated and used as his alter-egos. According to
Hand’s plan, Counter-Defendants would acquire large amounts of VitaminSpice’s stock through a
“reverse merger,” which is a frequently abused mechanism by which private companies are
merged into publicly traded shell companies. The purported “investors” in the publicly traded
shell company (debt holders and shareholders) then receive stock in the publicly traded merged
entity, often by issuing promissory notes rather than paying legitimate consideration. That
process allows those who control the “investors” to seize and exercise control over the ownership
and trading of the stock, which often increases in value. The “investors” (and those who control
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 4 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
4823-7140-0465.1
them) then control the outstanding shares (the “float”) of the stock, and use their control to their
financial benefit.
14. Hand specializes in reverse mergers and uses them to profit from stock acquired by
shell entities over which he exercises domination and control. Hand, however, does not disclose
that fact to others, and he did not disclose that fact to VitaminSpice or Bukstel when they hired
Hand as counsel or at any other time.
15. In September 2009, Hand proposed that VitaminSpice enter into a reverse merger
with a shell company owned by Hand’s brother, Jeremiah Learned Hand. That shell company
was called Qualsec, Inc., Symbol QLSC.OB (“Qualsec”).
16. While serving as VitaminSpice’s counsel, Hand convinced Bukstel and
VitaminSpice to proceed with the reverse merger. Hand did so in order to profit personally from
the deal. The reverse merger was completed on September 28, 2009.
Phase I of the Scheme: Hand Misrepresented And Concealed Material Facts In Order To
Seize Control Over VitaminSpice Stock.
17. The same day the reverse merger was completed, September 28, 2009, Hand was
working behind the scenes to implement a scheme in which he would control substantial shares of
VitaminSpice stock. Unbeknownst to VitaminSpice and Bukstel, Hand and his brother Jeremiah
Hand, who was the purported President (and sole officer and employee of) Qualsec, the public
shell with which VitaminSpice merged, executed a “Corporate Resolution” providing for “the
conversion” of purported “$130,0000 in promissory notes to Qualsec into 15,793,333 shares of
common stock, such shares to be issued free of any restrictive legend if so permitted by the legal
opinion of the Corporation’s legal counsel,” who was Hand. The “Corporate Resolution”
specifically resolved that Qualsec would convert these promissory notes into VitaminSpice shares
to be distributed as follows: William Wilkinson (3,644,613 shares), Doris Urueta Toro
(3,037,180), Bogdana Kovchuznaya (3,037,180 shares), Ekaterina Konushenko (3,037,180
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 5 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
4823-7140-0465.1
shares) and Esthetics World (3,037,180 shares).
18. This Corporate Resolution was false in two independent respects. First, there were
no true debts owed by these prospective shareholders to Qualsec. Instead, the “promissory
notes,” to the extent they existed at all, falsely stated that these prospective shareholders made
loans to Qualsec. They did not. Instead, Hand invented these promissory notes in order to
position Qualsec as a vehicle to undertake a reverse merger and dole out the resulting stock in the
names of persons and entities that he owned and/or controlled.
19. Second, the Corporate Resolution also was false in that these prospective
VitaminSpice shareholders were not legitimate. Instead, they were fronts for Hand – shell
companies that he incorporated and controlled, sometimes unilaterally, other times with the help
of relatives, friends or acquaintances such as his former driver in the Ukraine named Yuriy
Semenov, former spouses and/or girlfriends such as his former Russian spouses Bogdana
Kovchuznaya and Ekaterina Konushenko, and even fictional persons such as a purported person
named “William Wilkinson” who serves as the lone purported officer in many of Hand’s shell
companies. Hand, in fact, has created at least five Social Security numbers in the name of
Wilkinson, and has listed at least seven addresses for Wilkinson, including Hand’s office as well
as other addresses that Wilkinson shares with multiple of other shell companies that he controls.
Wilkinson, in fact, is the purported sole officer in a number of shell companies that own
VitaminSpice stock and are controlled entirely by Hand.
20. The same day on which Hand created the false Board Resolution, September 28,
2009, Hand sent an “Opinion Letter” to the transfer agent of VitaminSpice stock, Stalt, Inc.
(“Stalt”), stating falsely that VitaminSpice was not – and never was – a “shell company.” This
misrepresentation caused Stalt to immediately remove restrictive legends that created 15,793,333
free-trading VitaminSpice shares. If Hand would have told the truth, that the issuing company
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 6 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
4823-7140-0465.1
had been a “shell” previously, SEC Rule 144(i) would have required the shareholders to hold the
stock for one year prior to the removal of any restrictive legends. Neither VitaminSpice nor
Bukstel were aware of the false “Opinion Letter” to Stalt or Hand’s false statements therein.
21. Hand then seized control over those shares by having them transferred to himself
under the guise of transferring them to the purported shareholders who, as set forth above, were
fronts for Hand rather than legitimate shareholders with any claim to these shares.
22. Specifically, Hand’s false letter to Stalt enabled him to transfer VitaminSpice freetrading
shares to the following purported shareholders:
1. William Wilkinson 3,644.613 shares
2. Doris Urueta Toro 3,037,180 shares
3. Bogdana Kovchuznaya 3,037,180 shares
4. Ekaterina Konushenko 3,037,180 shares
5. Esthetics World 3,037,180 shares
23. Hand then ensured that all of the VitaminSpice shares issued in the name of these
purported shareholders went to him. Hand was the sole person communicating with Stalt, the
transfer agent, on behalf of these purported shareholders. In so doing, Hand misrepresented that
he was counsel for these persons and entities and, based upon that false representation of his
authority, Hand instructed Stalt to transfer all of the VitaminSpice shares to his law office. That
office, in fact, was the only address given by Hand for each and every one of these purported
shareholders.
24. Hand made other false statements to seize control over additional shares of
VitaminSpice stock. The same date on which he issued his “Opinion Letter,” September 28,
2009, Hand signed a “Seller’s Representation Letter” that released 1,783,334 shares with an
approximate value of $800,000.00. Hand signed the letter on behalf of a company called Duluth
Venture Capital Partners (“Duluth”), which was another shell company that Hand established and
controlled. In particular, Hand filed documentation with the California Secretary of State falsely
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 7 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
4823-7140-0465.1
stating that the sole officer of Duluth was “William Wilkinson” who, as set forth above, did not
exist.
25. Hand then moved the shares held by the five persons and entities set forth above,
so that they were held in the names of additional persons or entities over which he had ownership
and control. The stock held in the purported name of Ms. Ureta Toro, for example, was
transferred to the fictional Wilkinson (fabricated by Hand) and three separate entities in which the
fictional Wilkinson was the purported sole officer: Duluth Venture Capital Partners LLC
(“Duluth”), Qualsec Partners LLC (“Qualsec LLC”), and Tevarsis Corporation (“Tevarsis”). All
of these purported stockholders, which actually were Hand, used Hand’s addresses as their own,
and all of their VitaminSpice stock certificates were sent to those addresses, such that Hand had
total possession and control thereof. In fact, any certificates or other documents that were sent to
these purported stockholders at any other addresses, other than those of Hand, were returned as
undeliverable.
26. As of the end of September 2009, Hand controlled 21 million shares of
VitaminSpice stock, which constituted approximately 17.4% of the 121 million total shares issued
by VitaminSpice. The shares controlled by Hand were supposed to be restricted under SEC Rule
144(i). However, because of Hand’s misrepresentations to the transfer agent, referenced above,
all 21 million shares of Hand’s VitaminSpice stock were free-trading. VitaminSpice was
informed that there could be no more than 6 million free-trading shares in the public float. Hand,
therefore, controlled more than 15 million free-trading shares over the maximum permitted freetrading
shares, giving him control over the float of VitaminSpice stock, all because Hand evaded
Rule 144(i) by falsely informing the transfer agent that VitaminSpice was not – and never was – a
shell company.
27. On October 29, 2009, Hand signed another “Seller’s Representation Letter” (the
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 8 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
4823-7140-0465.1
“10/09 False Letter”) on the purported behalf of Duluth for the proposed sale of 1,633,334 shares
representing approximately $750,000 in value. As with the prior false letters, Hand again
misrepresented that the shares should be free trading without a restrictive legend because
VitaminSpice (including its predecessor Qualsec) was not, and never was, a “shell.”
28. Hand prepared and sent all of these false letters in order to gain control over
VitaminSpice stock and permit him to engage in his pump-and-dump scheme described below.
29. While Hand was making false statements that VitaminSpice never was a “shell
company,” which enabled him to secure free-trading shares in the name of his controlled persons
and entities, Hand used his role as VitaminSpice counsel to prevent the company from issuing
additional shares to legitimate investors (which would have reduced the float controlled by Hand.
30. For example, on March 24, 2010, Hand sent an email to Bukstel and the
VitaminSpice Board of Directors stating as follows: “Rule 144(i) (new rule) says that if the
company was a “shell” at any time in its history (as this company was for about two months prior
to the merger) …the restricted shares issued on the merger cannot use Rule 144 until 1 year after
the Form 10 … has been filed.” With this email and other similar communications, Hand
prevented legitimate VitaminSpice shareholders from trading their shares, while at the same time
Hand orchestrated his scheme to flood the market with free-trading shares issued in the name of
his shell companies, relatives, friends, and fictional persons.
31. Hand’s scheme continued through July 6, 2010, when Hand was terminated. Over
that entire timeframe, Hand increased his control over the free-trading shares of VitaminSpice
stock, using false statements to Stalt and other entities that VitaminSpice never was a shell
company (hence evading the restrictions of Rule 144(i) and persuading Stalt to issue unrestricted
shares). At the same time, Hand used his role as VitaminSpice counsel to instruct VitaminSpice’s
legitimate shareholders that they could not sell unrestricted shares given the mandates of Rule
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 9 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10
4823-7140-0465.1
144(i). As he told those shareholders in yet another Opinion Letter, this one issued on June 7,
2010, directly contrary to what he was telling Stalt: “As previously discussed, the issuer was
formerly a ‘shell’ company as defined by Rule 144(i).”
32. In early July 2010, Bukstel became aware of Hand’s scheme, including his use of
shell companies and alter-egos to acquire and control VitaminSpice stock.
33. On or around July 6, 2010, as a result of this information, Bukstel terminated
Hand. Bukstel also informed the transfer agent, Stalt, Inc. (“Stalt”), about Hand’s improprieties
in connection with the stock owned by Counter-Defendants and others who received
VitaminSpice stock from Counter-Defendants through the efforts of Hand. For example, Bukstel
provided Stalt with documents showing Counter-Defendants’ bogus addresses, shareholders, and
officers, as well as additional documents (including forgeries by Hand) showing Hand’s control
over Counter-Defendants and their VitaminSpice stock.
34. Despite Bukstel’s efforts to stop Hand’s and Counter-Defendants’ wrongful and
unlawful transactions in VitaminSpice stock, Hand undertook efforts, and conspired and worked
with Stalt, to permit Counter-Defendants to continue trading VitaminSpice stock. Hand and Stalt
profited from those transactions. Hand concealed these facts from Bukstel and VitaminSpice,
which relied on the concealment in that they waited for Stalt to implement stop-hold orders on
Counter-Defendants’ transactions, expecting Stalt to act as an independent transfer agent rather
than work and conspire with Hand. Stalt, however, failed to implement the stop-hold orders, and
worked and conspired with Hand to permit Counter-Defendants to continue trading VitaminSpice
stock.
35. Hand undertook cover-up efforts to conceal the above-alleged wrongful conduct.
Those cover-up efforts including the forgery of documents, the shredding of documents, and the
destruction of evidence that would uncover his fraud and other misconduct.
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 10 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11
4823-7140-0465.1
Hand’s and Counter-Defendants’ misconduct has had a substantial and detrimental impact on
VitaminSpice and its stock. After controlling the stock’s float to drive up the share price, Hand
and Counter-Defendants have sold the shares to reap the profits, leading to a substantial decrease
in the value and price of VitaminSpice stock.
Phase II of the Scheme: Hand Used Inside Information To Profit From Trading His
Improperly Controlled VitaminSpice Stock.
36. In early November 2009, Hand’s control over the float of VitaminSpice stock
increased exponentially. Hand seized control over large amounts of free-trading shares by using
false and forged documents. One such document consisted of a “Resolution” by the
VitaminSpice Board of Directors minutes stating falsely that “a meeting of the Board of Directors
of Qualsec” was “held on the 2nd Day of November 2009.” There was no such meeting. The
document included forged signatures of Board of Directors members Bukstel and Richard Seelig.
The document also identified Hand as an “Assistant Secretary to the Board of Directors,” which
he never was. The document was signed by Kimberly Peterson, Hand’s Assistant, purportedly as
“Assistant Secretary to the Board,” which she never was.
37. The Resolution authorized the issuance of 637,180 shares for Esthetics World,
another shell company created and controlled by Hand. The lone purported officer of Esthetics
World was Karen Campo, who is identified in SEC documents filed by Hand as a “special events
entertainer” from Panama. As with the shares in the names of his other shell companies, Hand
controlled these shares, which were sent to his office, and he was the sole person engaging in the
sale of these shares.
38. Hand created additional false “Corporate Resolutions” in order to seize control
over additional large amounts of VitaminSpice stock. Hand forged the signatures of Bukstel and
Seelig again on a “Resolution” authorizing the issuance of 3,037,180 shares in the name of a
company called Bio-Clean Products, which was another shell created and controlled by Hand.
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 11 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12
4823-7140-0465.1
On November 3, 2009, Hand created other false “Resolutions” authorizing 3,037,180 shares to be
issued to Cylogic Aerospace and 637,180 to Able Direct Marketing, additional shells he created
and controlled. The metadata for these resolutions establishes that they were created by Hand in
mid-November 2009 and then backdated by Hand. The Esthetics World resolution was signed by
Hand’s assistant as purported “Assistant Secretary” of VitaminSpice, which she was not, and
included a forged signature of Mr. Bukstel. That resolution also falsely stated that Hand was
“Assistant Secretary” to the Board of Directors of VitaminSpice, which he was not (which, in
fact, would have required him to notify the SEC under Form 8k).
39. Following his prior pattern, after Hand secured these shares, he again made false
representations in order to evade Rule 144(i) and secure free-trading stock certificates. Hand
provided opinion letters to Stalt falsely stating that VitaminSpice never was a “shell” company.
This false statement caused Stalt to issue free-trading stock certificates, which would not have
occurred if Hand truthfully represented that VitaminSpice’s predecessor was a shell company.
40. Hand, therefore, made false representations to the transfer agent as a sham
designed to evade the registration requirements of federal securities laws and secure control over
free-trading shares that should have been restricted. Hand’s intent and purpose was to secure the
issuance of free-trading shares in violation of federal securities laws.
41. These improper stock transactions – which Hand consummated through false
statements and concealments – increased Hand’s stranglehold over the float of VitaminSpice’s
stock. Because of Hand’s false representations and forged resolutions, he was able to sell over
6.7 million additional shares of VitaminSpice stock over a period of time, doubling the shares in
the float and commensurately increasing his dominating share thereof.
42. Hand then undertook actions that were intended to – and did – profit by dumping
the stock at strategically chosen points. This was a class pump-and-dump scheme, and it was
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 12 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13
4823-7140-0465.1
initiated and engineered by the person who had fiduciary and ethical duties to act in accordance
with VitaminSpice’s best interests.
43. One of the most significant events in the short history of VitaminSpice as a public
company was the pending announcement that Mr. William Fields, the former President of
Walmart Stores division and close associate of Sam Walton, was joining the VitaminSpice Board
of Directors. Mr. Fields was credited with bringing Walmart from a $60 million entity to a $240
billion company (in revenues) during his tenure. Mr. Fields was impressed with the products
developed by VitaminSpice and the wholesale and retail opportunities associated with the concept
of utilizing condiments to deliver vitamins for nutrition.
44. Before the announcement was made public (which did not occur until November
30, 2009), Hand enlisted the help of stock promoters to aggressive market, and increase the price
of, VitaminSpice stock. Hand enlisted the help of RedChip Companies (“RedChip”), which Hand
compensated with VitaminSpice stock. In order to secure these as free-trading shares and evade
Rule 144(i), Hand again made false statements to Stalt that VitaminSpice never was a “shell”
company. Hand also arranged for a wire transfer of $110,000.00 from the account of his
purported client Esthetics World, supposedly a Wyoming-based land-development company,
which he owned and controlled, to James Farinella and Gerard Adams of Wall Street Grand, who
were stock promoters. Hand’s purpose was to undertake an aggressive promotion of
VitaminSpice stock, so that Hand could profit from the sale of that stock by his controlled persons
and entities. No disclosure of this transaction was made to VitaminSpice or Bukstel or to the
public.
45. The stock promotions paid off for Hand. Because of RedChip’s promotional
efforts, the price of VitaminSpice stock rose from 32 cents on November 1, 2009 to 47 cents on
November 10, 2009. During this price rise, and to profit therefrom, Hand sold shares held by his
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 13 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
14
4823-7140-0465.1
shell companies. On November 4th and 5th 2009, Hand traded VitaminSpice stock, through the
guise of Esthetics World, which brought in $140,000.00 on those two days alone, based on
information from only one stock clearinghouse (and there were others used by Hand, which will
be revealed in discovery).
46. VitaminSpice then issued its press release on November 30, 2009. As a result of
that press release, the price of VitaminSpice stock rose to 67 cents on December 2, 2009. Hand
then traded stock held by his controlled persons and entities in order to reap substantial profits.
From December 2, 2009 through December 22, 2009, Hand sold stock under the guise of William
Wilkinson and Esthetics World that yielded a profit of $296,307.00.
Phase III of the Scheme: Hand Launched Pump-And-Dump Schemes To Profit From
Trading His Improperly Controlled VitaminSpice Stock.
47. Having seized control over much of VitaminSpice’s stock float, Hand then
embarked upon a pump-and-dump scheme in which he profited through the sale of his unlawfully
controlled VitaminSpice stock.
48. On January 6, 2010, Hand enlisted the help of one of his cohorts, John Ballard, to
whom Hand sent wire-transfer information for a stock-promotion company called Tritos, Inc.,
d/b/a Market Advisors, Inc. (hereinafter “Tritos”). Hand’s purpose and effect of this wire transfer
was to undertake a pump-and-dump scheme using Tritos to convey false information to the
investment community about VitaminSpice, causing the stock price to inflate artificially and
enabling Hand to sell his shares and reap the improper proceeds therefrom.
49. Hand paid Tritos $3,500.00 to prepare a report with multiple false representations
about VitaminSpice. For example, Hand made the following misrepresentations about
VitaminSpice, each and every one of which was featured in the false report:
? “The company currently offers six different spices coupled with six
different vitamin/mineral formulations resulting in 36 total product
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 14 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15
4823-7140-0465.1
offerings.” This was false. VitaminSpice offered only four vitamininfused
spices, and there were no “vitamin-mineral formulations” for each.
Accordingly, VitaminSpice has only four (4) products, not (36), as Hand
falsely told the public and investment community.
? “Indications of interest above $10 million from various health food stores,
retain outlets, major grocery chains, and home shopping companies.” This
was false. Hand totally made this up.
? “MOU with major European distributor, final agreement TBA end of first
quarter.” This was false. There were email exchanges about a potential
business relationship with a European distributor, but nothing that was
close to an understanding.
? “Partnered with single largest Chinese public sector JV in China,
Intersource, for product list throughout China.” This was false. There was
an initial agreement with Intersource, but there was nothing close to a
distribution relationship at that time. The timeframe for any such
distribution was not even established. Moreover, by no means was
Intersource the “single largest Chinese public sector JV in China.”
? “Finalizing aqusition [sic] of key technology related to the
microencapsulation process.” This was false. VitaminSpice was in the
discussion phase, and was considering the general prospects of entering
into an asset-purchase agreement, but the company was nowhere close to
“finalizing” the acquisition of such technology.
? “Canada and Australia distribution expected to be signed by beginning 2nd
quarter.” This was false. There were no such distribution relationships.
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 15 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16
4823-7140-0465.1
? “The Company expects to see products coming to stores such as Target
Corporation (TGT),… while going head-to-head with McCormick & Co.,
Inc. (MKC), the single largest spice company in the world.” These
statements were false. The Target statement was a total fabrication. And
the statement about going “head-to-head with McCormick & Co., Inc.,”
which had $3.7 billion in revenues, was a gross misrepresentation about
where VitaminSpice was at that point and in the foreseeable future.
50. In January 2010, Hand once again paid $3,500 for yet another newsletter issued by
Tritos. As with the prior effort, Hand made numerous additional misrepresentations in this
newsletter with the intent and effect of misleading the investment community and pumping up the
price of VitaminSpice stock, so that he could realize substantial unlawful windfalls when he sold
the stock owned and controlled by his puppet VitaminSpice stockholders.
? “The company currently offers six different spices coupled with six
different vitamin/mineral formulations resulting in 36 total product
offerings.” This repeats the false statement referenced above.
? Hand reiterates the false statement that VitaminSpice had “ndications of
interest above $10 million from various health food stores, retain outlets,
major grocery chains, and home shopping companies.” As before, this was
totally false.
? “Calivate International M.O.U. to market through International MLM
distribution.” This also was false. Hand made this up completely.
? “Currently in talks with a nutritional performance sports company to
develop post-workout recovery formulas and utilize celebrity athlete
endorsements.” No such talks occurred of any substantive nature.
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 16 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
17
4823-7140-0465.1
? “”International distributor interest in Europe, Canada, and Australia.” This
was false. There were no active talks with such distributors.
? “MOU with major European distributor, final agreement TBA end of first
quarter.” This was false. There were email exchanges about a potential
business relationship with a European distributor, but nothing that was
close to an understanding.
51. These false statements caused the price of VitaminSpice stock to inflate
dramatically. The false reports, set forth above, were released on January 13, 2010. On that date,
VitaminSpice stock was trading at 47 cents. By January 14, 2010, the very next day, the
VitaminSpice stock price increased to as high as 58 cents, an increase of more than 20%.
52. Hand then seized on this artificial leap to dump massive amounts of his ill-gotten
VitaminSpice shares. Between January 14, 2010 and February 1, 2020, Hand sold over 260,000
shares of VitaminSpice stock in the name of his fictional character Wilkinson, which yielded
proceeds in the amount of $131,946.00, much of which represents improper profits from the
artificially enhanced price caused by Hand’s false reports.
53. The data in the preceding paragraphs are from only one clearinghouse. There are
other clearinghouses through which Hand traded his VitaminSpice stock. The shares improperly
traded by Hand, as part of his pump-and-dump scheme, will be unveiled during the course of
discovery in this case, and the above represents a small window into the magnitude of his
improperly gained profits.
54. Emboldened by his profits from the first pump-and-dump scheme, Hand then
engaged in another. On May 5, 2010, Hand, along with his brother Jeremiah, Farinella, and
Kevin Lee Woodbridge (a convicted felon incarcerated for SEC Violations and a close associate
of Hand) conspired together to create their own press release to pump up the price of
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 17 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
18
4823-7140-0465.1
VitaminSpice stock without any knowledge or consent of the company or anyone its Board of
Directors.
55. Specifically, they drafted a release falsely stating that VitaminSpice was one of the
“headliners” of an upcoming show in Las Vegas. The release also falsely stated that
VitaminSpice’s “online sales are growing exponentially,” and that “VitaminSpice’s success in
expanding their reach through traditional distribution channels continues with national and
specialty shop agreements.” VitaminSpice’s “online sales” were not “growing exponentially,”
and there were no such “national and specialty shop agreements.”
56. As of April 29, 2010, the price of VitaminSpice stock was 45 cents, the vast
majority of which was artificially inflated due to Hand’s false statements referenced above as
well as additional false reports to media outlets both in writing and verbally by Hand and his
cohorts.
57. When Bukstel learned about this false press release on May 5, 2010, he confronted
Hand and his cohorts and insisted that they withdraw the press release and correct the record.
Hand and his cohorts reacted by retaliating and dumping their VitaminSpice stock. They sold
millions of shares of VitaminSpice stock, causing the price to drop to 20 cents as of May 14,
2010. Their sales continued and crashed the stock, causing it to drop to 6 cents on April 1, 2011.
58. Because of the schemes orchestrated and implemented by Hand, including his
false statements to Stalt and the investing public, VitaminSpice’s stock has crashed and never
recovered. After acquiring VitaminSpice stock for no consideration, and controlling almost all
the float of VitaminSpice stock, Hand was able to manipulate the stock’s price and market,
artificially inflating its levels and crashing the price when it became in his strategic and economic
interests to do so. As a result, VitaminSpice has suffered a devastating decrease in its market
value, from $52 million at the time of the reverse merger to less than $1 million today. In
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 18 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
19
4823-7140-0465.1
addition, Hand’s misconduct has caused devastating losses to Bukstel, whose shares were valued
at approximately $22 million, and now they are worth approximately $277,200.00.
59. In early July 2010, Bukstel became aware of Hand’s scheme, including his use of
shell companies and alter-egos to acquire and control VitaminSpice stock.
60. On or around July 6, 2010, as a result of this information, Bukstel terminated
Hand. Bukstel also informed the transfer agent, Stalt, Inc. (“Stalt”), about Hand’s improprieties
in connection with the stock owned by Counter-Defendants and others who received
VitaminSpice stock from Counter-Defendants through the efforts of Hand. For example, Bukstel
provided Stalt with documents showing Counter-Defendants’ bogus addresses, shareholders, and
officers, as well as additional documents (including forgeries by Hand) showing Hand’s control
over Counter-Defendants and their VitaminSpice stock.
61. On or around July 8, 2010, Adam Hand (Hand’s brother) sent an email to Farinella
stating that “if ed would step down I could get the team back together and this thing back 2 40
(cents) in a week.” This statement reflects the conspiracy between Hand, his brother, Farinella
and others to manipulate the price of VitaminSpice stock through Hand’s control over its float.
This statement also reflects their knowledge of their ability to artificially inflate VitaminSpice
stock’s price at will through gross market manipulation.
62. Despite Bukstel’s efforts to stop Hand’s and Counter-Defendants’ wrongful and
unlawful transactions in VitaminSpice stock, Hand undertook efforts, and conspired and worked
with Stalt, to permit Counter-Defendants to continue trading VitaminSpice stock. Hand and Stalt
profited from those transactions. Hand concealed these facts from Bukstel and VitaminSpice,
which relied on the concealment in that they waited for Stalt to implement stop-hold orders on
Counter-Defendants’ transactions, expecting Stalt to act as an independent transfer agent rather
than work and conspire with Hand. Stalt, however, failed to implement the stop-hold orders, and
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 19 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
20
4823-7140-0465.1
worked and conspired with Hand to permit Counter-Defendants to continue trading VitaminSpice
stock.
63. Hand undertook cover-up efforts to conceal the above-alleged wrongful conduct.
Those cover-up efforts including the forgery of documents, the shredding of documents, and the
destruction of evidence that would uncover his fraud and other misconduct.
Hand Consistently Concealed His Control Over Counter-Defendants Able, Esthetics and
International As Well As Other VitaminSpice Shareholders.
64. Hand concealed, and failed to disclose to Bukstel and/or VitaminSpice, that Hand
controlled Counter-Defendants, which acquired VitaminSpice stock as a result of the reverse
merger. Able, Esthetics and International received such shares as debt holders and/or
shareholders in Qualsec, and Advanced purchased its shares from Qualsec’s shareholders.
65. Hand created, incorporated, controlled, and ran each of the Counter-Defendants.
Purporting to serve as their “counsel,” Hand incorporated Counter-Defendants and enlisted the
help of persons under his control to serve as Counter-Defendants’ purported shareholders and
officers. The same persons, in fact, were enlisted repeatedly by Hand to serve as purported
shareholders and officers for various Counter-Defendants, including Yuriy Semenov and others
who live overseas and take their direction and instruction from Hand with regard to Counter-
Defendants’ business operations. Hand also used names of persons who were either fictitious or
deceased to serve as Counter-Defendants’ purported shareholders and officers, such as “William
Wilkinson,” who is listed as a shareholder and/or officer for multiple companies controlled by
Hand including Counter-Defendants.
66. Because of Hand’s control over Counter-Defendants, Hand had control over, and
legal and beneficial ownership of, the VitaminSpice stock purportedly owned by Counter-
Defendants.
67. Hand was able to trade staggering amounts of VitaminSpice stock and reap
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 20 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
21
4823-7140-0465.1
extraordinary profits by selling that stock through his bogus controlled persons and entities. From
the reverse merger to March 29, 2011, Hand pocketed $1,284,138.23 from the sale of
VitaminSpice stock through Esthetics World and Wilkinson alone. These staggering numbers,
moreover, are based on information from only one clearinghouse – Penson Financial, Inc. It is
expected that Hand’s trading activities were far broader than that, and discovery will reveal the
true magnitude of Hand’s scheme and the unlawful profits resulting therefrom.
68. Hand concealed, from Bukstel and VitaminSpice, his ownership and control over
Counter-Defendants and the VitaminSpice stock purportedly owned by Counter-Defendants. In
addition, Hand misrepresented, to Bukstel and VitaminSpice, that Counter-Defendants were
distinct and viable entities.
69. Hand undertook various measures to misrepresent that Counter-Defendants were
distinct and viable entities rather than shells and his alter-egos. Hand used invalid addresses for
Counter-Defendants; Hand used deceased or non-existent persons, and/or persons over whom
Hand exercised control, as purported officers of Counter-Defendants, and Hand executed forged
and fraudulent documents in order to give the misimpression that Counter-Defendants were
controlled by other persons.
70. Hand also exercised control over Counter-Defendants to transfer VitaminSpice
shares to other shell entities that Hand used as his alter-egos. For example, Hand controlled
Counter-Defendants to transfer VitaminSpice shares to an entity called Duluth Venture Capital
Partners, LLC, which is controlled solely by Hand, not the purported “Managing Partner,”
William Wilkinson, who is either a fictitious person or someone who, according to Hand, was at a
hospice, and about to pass away, years ago. Indeed, the non-existent or deceased Wilkinson also
is Qualsec Partners, LLC’s purported “President.”
71. Hand used his control over Counter-Defendants and their VitaminSpice stock to
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 21 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
22
4823-7140-0465.1
profit and enrich himself through the trading of such stock. Hand orchestrated hundreds of
transactions with VitaminSpice stock, including public sales of such stock as well as private
transactions in which he transferred such stock between and among Counter-Defendants. Hand
profited from these efforts by receiving monies that were deposited into bank accounts over
which he exercised total control, including Hand’s “client-trust” account, which Hand used as a
clearinghouse for transfers of monies by and to Counter-Defendants and other companies over
which Hand exercised control. Hand actually used his “client-trust” account as his own personal
bank account, and Hand treated, used and profited from the funds therein as though they were his
own. Hand’s profits resulted in the diversion of substantial funds from VitaminSpice, which was
damaged thereby.
72. Hand made additional misrepresentations in order to exact his control over large
amounts of VitaminSpice stock issued to persons and entities he controlled.
73. Hand concealed and misrepresented all of the above-alleged facts with the
intention of inducing Bukstel and VitaminSpice to work with Hand, execute contracts, and
undertake other efforts that allowed Counter-Defendants to own and trade VitaminSpice stock.
And Bukstel and VitaminSpice did rely on Hand’s misrepresentations and misrepresentations by
working with Hand, executing contracts, and undertaking other efforts that allowed Counter-
Defendants to own and trade VitaminSpice stock.
74. At all times relevant to Bukstel’s and VitaminSpice’s allegations, Counter-
Defendants were Hand’s alter-egos. Counter-Defendants were grossly undercapitalized; they
failed to abide by corporate formalities; they have not had shareholder meetings; they have been
controlled by Hand at his discretion; and they have been used to accomplish wrongful and unjust
purposes and schemes of the person controlling it. In particular, Counter-Defendants were
Hand’s alter egos because, among other things:
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 22 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
23
4823-7140-0465.1
a. Counter-Defendants are influenced and governed by Hand. This is established by,
among other things, facts showing that: Hand has exercised complete dominance
and control over Counter-Defendants, such Counter-Defendants are mere shells
and instrumentalities for the conduct of Hand’s personal business activities; Hand
used Counter-Defendants as a mere shell for Hand’s business activities, including
the purchase and sale of VitaminSpice’s stock over which Hand asserted
ownership, domination, and control; Hand directed and guided Counter-
Defendants’ decisions and conduct in connection with the VitaminSpice stock at
issue as well as other decisions and conduct; Hand, not Counter-Defendants’ lone
“officers” and/or employees, controlled and directed the funding, purchase and
sale of VitaminSpice stock at issue; Counter-Defendants deferred to Hand in
connection with their decisions and operations; Hand had control over Counter-
Defendants’ monies and operations; and Counter-Defendants did not undertake
any substantive business activities without Hand’s direction, instruction and
control.
b. There is a unity of interest and ownership such that Counter-Defendants and Hand
are inseparable and the separate personalities of Counter-Defendants and Hand
never existed. This unity of interest and ownership is established by, among other
things, facts showing that: Hand commingled Counter-Defendants’ alleged funds
with Hand’s own funds in his client-trust account and personal account; Hand
profited personally from Counter-Defendants’ business transactions, including
Counter-Defendants’ purported purchase of VitaminSpice stock, which was
secured through funds deposited into Hand’s bank account rather than Counter-
Defendants’ own funds or assets; Hand failed to attempt to distinguish Counter-
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 23 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
24
4823-7140-0465.1
Defendants’ funds from his own funds; Hand used Counter-Defendants’ funds to
pay debts and satisfy obligations owed by Hand personally and/or by his other
shell companies that he uses as alter-egos; Counter-Defendants failed to maintain
adequate and legitimate minutes, failed to maintain adequate corporate records,
and failed to document and/or memorialize significant or substantive corporate
decisions in any manner; Hand used his address as Counter-Defendants’ alleged
business address; at Hand’s direction and instruction, there was no capital invested
in Counter-Defendants; at Hand’s direction and instruction, Counter-Defendants
had no corporate assets; Hand concealed and misrepresented to Bukstel,
VitaminSpice and others that Counter-Defendants were distinct, viable entities;
Hand concealed his personal business through the artifice of Counter-Defendants,
including the purchase and sale of VitaminSpice stock and other corporate stock
over which Hand asserted ownership, domination, and control; Hand disregarded
legal formalities in his dealings with Counter-Defendants, including exercising
total control over Counter-Defendants’ decision-making and failing to take
direction or guidance from anyone at Counter-Defendants with regard to decisions
made by Hand in connection with Counter-Defendants; Counter-Defendants had
no legitimate business purpose, function, or focus; and Hand failed to maintain
arms-length relationships between and among Counter-Defendants and Hand’s
other related entities, including the use by Hand of such other entities’ funds for
purposes of purchasing stock purportedly on behalf of Counter-Defendants.
75. Fraud or injustice, including harm and damage to Bukstel and VitaminSpice,
would result if Counter-Defendants were permitted to maintain the fiction of a separate identity.
Hand used Counter-Defendants in order to conduct Hand’s personal business in violation of
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 24 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
25
4823-7140-0465.1
securities laws and his ethical duties to VitaminSpice and Bukstel. For example, Hand used
Counter-Defendants as a front to purchase and control VitaminSpice stock, in violation of
disclosure and ownership requirements under securities laws. Moreover, it would be inequitable
and unfair if Counter-Defendants were permitted to recover from Bukstel or VitaminSpice in this
case, as though Counter-Defendants were separate entities. Accordingly, the Court should find
that Counter-Defendants are Hand’s alter egos in order to avoid such inequitable results.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
By Bukstel and VitaminSpice
Against Counter-Defendants and Third-Party Defendant Hand_
Fraud in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
False Statements To Secure Free-Trading Shares
76. Bukstel and VitaminSpice reallege paragraphs 1 through 75 of their Counterclaims
and Third-Party claims as though they were fully set forth herein.
77. Counter-Defendants and Third-Party Defendant, directly and indirectly, with
scienter, including with reckless disregard, in connection with the purchase and sale of securities,
by use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce, or
of the mails:
a. employed devices, schemes or artifices to defraud;
b. obtained money or property by means of any untrue statements of material
fact, or have omitted to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and/or;
c. engaged in transactions, practices, or courses of business which operated or
would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchasers of securities.
78. Rule 144, promulgated by the SEC under the 1933 Act, permits the sale of
restricted and uncontrolled securities without registration under limited circumstances. Effective
on February 15, 2008, the SEC amended Rule 144(i) to, among other things, preclude the use of
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 25 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
26
4823-7140-0465.1
Rule 144 for the resale of securities initially issued by an issuer that is – or ever was – a shell
company. Under amended Rule 144(i), no shareholder could utilize Rule 144 as an exemption
from registration if the issuer is, or ever was, a shell company, unless the issuer met certain
specified requirements to cure its shell status, which VitaminSpice never did.
79. Amended Rule 144(i) ensured that Counter-Defendants’ and Hand’s VitaminSpice
shares were restricted. Nevertheless, Counter-Defendants and Hand secured free-trading
VitaminSpice shares by lying to the transfer agent, Stalt, and misrepresenting that VitaminSpice
is not – and never was – a shell company. Counter-Defendants and Hand made these
misrepresentations in order to secure free-trading shares of VitaminSpice stock that they could
use to reap substantial profits given Hand’s control over Counter-Defendants and the float of
VitaminSpice stock.
80. These false statements by Counter-Defendants and Hand caused Counter-Plaintiffs
to suffer economic losses. For example, as a result of Counter-Defendants’ and Hand’s
misrepresentations, they were able to secure and exert control over the float of VitaminSpice
stock, which was dominated by Hand’s improperly gained unrestricted shares, enabling him to
manipulate the price thereof and exact substantial profits therefrom.
81. These actions by Counter-Defendants and Hand were part of a scheme designed to
defraud Counter-Plaintiffs and the public and enrich Counter-Defendants and Hand, and which
operated as a fraud on Counter-Plaintiffs and Third-Party Plaintiff.
82. Counter-Defendants and Hand made these material misstatements and
concealments with scienter – either with knowledge of the falsity or with deliberate, reckless
disregard of the truth.
83. By reason of the foregoing conduct, Counter-Defendants have violated Section
10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 26 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
27
4823-7140-0465.1
84. As a direct and proximate cause of Hand’s and Counter-Defendants’
misrepresentations and concealments, Bukstel and VitaminSpice have suffered damages far in
excess of $75,000.00. Under Section 10b and Rule 10-b5, Counter-Plaintiffs are also entitled to
treble damages.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
(Against Counter-Defendants and Third-Party Defendant Hand_
Fraud in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
Hand’s Control Over Counter-Defendants and Others
85. Bukstel and VitaminSpice reallege paragraphs 1 through 84 of their Counterclaims
and Third-Party claims as though they were fully set forth herein.
86. Counter-Defendants and Third-Party Defendant, directly and indirectly, with
scienter, including with reckless disregard, in connection with the purchase and sale of securities,
by use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce, or
of the mails:
a. employed devices, schemes or artifices to defraud;
b. obtained money or property by means of any untrue statements of material
fact, or have omitted to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and/or;
c. engaged in transactions, practices, or courses of business which operated or
would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchasers of securities.
87. Hand owned and/or controlled a substantial part of the float of VitaminSpice
shares, by and through his control over Counter-Defendants and their VitaminSpice shares.
Furthermore, Hand and Counter-Defendants misrepresented to Bukstel and VitaminSpice that
Counter-Defendants were independent and viable entities, and failed to disclose Hand’s beneficial
and legal ownership and/or control over Counter-Defendants and their VitaminSpice stock.
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 27 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
28
4823-7140-0465.1
88. Hand’s misrepresentations, or omissions of material facts, also were made in
VitaminSpice’s Registration Statement and Prospectus, which Hand prepared. In those
documents, Hand made material misrepresentations regarding the ownership and control of
Counter-Defendants and other stockholders that he owned or controlled, which gave him control
over a substantial portion of the public float.
89. Governing law requires disclosure in the prospectus of the natural persons who
had “beneficial ownership” of the VitaminSpice shares. Without such disclosure, the SEC would
not clear a registration statement, and the OTC Bulletin Board would not approve VitaminSpice’s
application to list its shares. The same information is required for shares owned by executive
officers, directors, and holders of more than 5% of issued common stock. “Beneficial ownership”
means the right to vote, to direct the disposition of, or to enjoy the other benefits of ownership
including receiving the proceeds of sales of the shares. Under the beneficial ownership rules, if
shares are held by a corporation or other entity, the individual (natural person) beneficial owner
has to be supplied. If a natural person controls shares held by more than one entity, the
ownership of the two entities has to be aggregated.
90. The information in the VitaminSpice prospectus regarding Counter-Defendants,
and the other shareholders owned or controlled by false, is false and materially misleading, or
omits to state a fact necessary to make the statements not misleading, in that the information
misrepresents the beneficial ownership of the shares by those persons and entities, and fails to
disclose that Hand was the true beneficial owner of such shares.
91. Hand and Counter-Defendants undertook these concealments and made these
misrepresentations with knowledge of their falsity or with deliberate and reckless disregard for
the truth. Hand and Counter-Defendants also intended to undertake these concealments and make
these misrepresentations in order to induce Counter-Plaintiffs and Third-Party Plaintiffs to work
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 28 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
4823-7140-0465.1
with Hand, sign contracts, and permit Counter-Defendants to own and trade VitaminSpice stock.
92. Bukstel and VitaminSpice reasonably relied on the concealments and
misrepresentations by Hand and Counter-Defendants by, among other things, retaining Hand,
agreeing to proceed with the reverse merger, allowing Hand to engineer the various transactions
in which Counter-Defendants secured their shares of VitaminSpice stock, and allowing Counter-
Defendants to trade and own VitaminSpice stock. If Counter-Plaintiffs and Third-Party Plaintiffs
would have known the truth, they would never had retained Hand as VitaminSpice’s counsel
and/or proceeded with the reverse merger and transactions with Hand and Counter-Defendants.
93. As a direct and proximate cause of Hand’s and Counter-Defendants’
misrepresentations and concealments, Bukstel and VitaminSpice have suffered damages far in
excess of $75,000.00. Under Section 10b and Rule 10-b5, Counter-Plaintiffs are also entitled to
treble damages.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
By Bukstel
Against Third-Party Defendant Hand_
Fraud in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
Pump-and-Dump Schemes
94. Bukstel realleges paragraphs 1 through 93 of his Counterclaims and Third-Party
claims as though they were fully set forth herein.
95. Third-Party Defendant Hand, directly and indirectly, with scienter, including with
reckless disregard, in connection with the purchase and sale of securities, by use of any means or
instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce, or of the mails:
a. employed devices, schemes or artifices to defraud;
b. obtained money or property by means of any untrue statements of material
fact, or have omitted to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and/or;
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 29 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
4823-7140-0465.1
c. engaged in transactions, practices, or courses of business which operated or
would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchasers of securities.
96. The false statements and material omissions by Hand, or omissions of material
facts, were made in press releases, which were intended to – and did – artificially inflate the price
of VitaminSpice stock. Hand then dumped the stock by unloading millions of shares over which
he exercised control, causing the stock price to plummet far below the value at which Bukstel
acquired the stock in connection with the reverse merger.
97. Because of Hand’s misconduct, VitaminSpice’s stock has fallen dramatically, and
it has never recovered. Hand’s actions in dumping the stock have harmed Bukstel and other
shareholders by rendering the value of their shares as a fraction of the amounts that those shares
were valued when they were acquired.
98. The false statements and material omissions by Counter-Defendants and Hand
caused Counter-Plaintiffs to suffer substantial economic losses as set forth above.
99. These actions by Hand were part of a scheme designed to defraud Bukstel and
other VitaminSpice shareholders, and operated as a fraud on them.
100. Hand made these material misstatements and concealments with scienter – with
knowledge of the falsity or with deliberate, reckless disregard of the truth.
101. By reason of the foregoing conduct, Hand has violated Section 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
102. As a direct and proximate cause of Hand’s and Counter-Defendants’
misrepresentations and concealments, Bukstel and VitaminSpice have suffered damages far in
excess of $75,000.00. Under Section 10b and Rule 10-b5, Third-Party Plaintiffs are also entitled
to treble damages.
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(Against Counter-Defendants and Third-Party Defendant Hand_
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 30 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
31
4823-7140-0465.1
Fraud in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5
Hand’s Control Over Float And Unlawful Participation In Stock Sales
103. Bukstel and VitaminSpice reallege paragraphs 1 through 102 of their
Counterclaims and Third-Party claims as though they were fully set forth herein.
104. Counter-Defendants and Third-Party Defendant Hand, directly and indirectly, with
scienter, including with reckless disregard, in connection with the purchase and sale of securities,
by use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce, or
of the mails:
a. employed devices, schemes or artifices to defraud;
b. obtained money or property by means of any untrue statements of material
fact, or have omitted to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and/or;
c. engaged in transactions, practices, or courses of business which
operated or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchasers of securities.
105. With his control over the float of VitaminSpice stock, Hand could and did
manipulate the price of VitaminSpice stock by giving the false impression of an active market and
artificially inflating the price thereof. As alleged above, the drop in the price of VitaminSpice
stock was caused by the winding down of the price-manipulation and pump-and-dump scheme
engaged in by Hand. Hand also violated Regulation M, which was adopted by the SEC under
Section 10b in order to preclude manipulative conduct by persons with an interest in the outcome
of an offering. It generally prohibits activities and conduct that could artificially influence the
market for an offered security. Rule 102 of Regulation M prohibits selling stockholders, and their
affiliates, or persons involved in the selling stockholder’s acquisition of its securities, from
bidding for, purchasing, or attempting to induce any other person to bid for or purchase the
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 31 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
32
4823-7140-0465.1
security that is the subject of the distribution during a specified “restricted period.” “Restricted
period” is defined in Rule 101 to commence five days before the selling shareholder can sell to
the time the selling shareholder has completed selling its shares.
106. As alleged above, Counter-Defendants and Third-Party Defendant Hand were
involved in the purchase of VitaminSpice stock by other persons or entities controlled by Hand,
and/or induced such purchases, during the course of the “restricted period.”
107. As a direct and proximate cause of Hand’s and Counter-Defendants’ manipulation
and unlawful misconduct, Counter-Plaintiffs have suffered damages far in excess of $75,000.00.
FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(Against Counter-Defendants and Third-Party Defendant Hand_
Common Law Fraud
108. Bukstel and VitaminSpice reallege paragraphs 1 through 107 of their
Counterclaims and Third-Party claims as though they were fully set forth herein.
109. Hand and Counter-Defendants made false statements of material facts to Bukstel
and VitaminSpice in connection with the purchase and sale of VitaminSpice securities. In
particular, Hand and Counter-Defendants made false statements that Hand was an objective and
independent attorney who would work on behalf of, and in the interest of, VitaminSpice; that
Hand had no direct relationship with Counter-Defendants; that Hand did not have control over
Counter-Defendants; and that Hand was not involved in the control and trading of VitaminSpice
stock.
110. Hand and Counter-Defendants also concealed material facts from Bukstel and
VitaminSpice in connection with the purchase and sale of VitaminSpice stock. In particular,
Hand and Counter-Defendants concealed the facts that Hand did not work on behalf of, and in the
interest of, VitaminSpice; that Hand had a direct relationship with Counter-Defendants; that Hand
had control over Counter-Defendants; that Hand was involved in the control and trading of
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 32 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
33
4823-7140-0465.1
VitaminSpice stock; that Hand profited from Counter-Defendants’ VitaminSpice transactions;
and that Hand worked and conspired with Stalt to allow Counter-Defendants to continue trading
VitaminSpice stock.
111. Bukstel and VitaminSpice reasonably relied on the misrepresentations and
concealments by Hand and Counter-Defendants by, among other things, retaining Hand, agreeing
to proceed with the reverse merger, allowing Hand to engineer the various transactions in which
Counter-Defendants secured their shares of VitaminSpice stock, and allowing Counter-
Defendants to trade and own VitaminSpice stock. If Bukstel and VitaminSpice would have
known the truth, they would never had retained Hand as VitaminSpice’s counsel and/or
proceeded with the reverse merger and transactions with Hand and Counter-Defendants.
112. Hand and Counter-Defendants undertook these concealments and made these
misrepresentations with knowledge of their falsity or with deliberate and reckless disregard for
the truth. Hand and Counter-Defendants also intended to undertake these concealments and make
these misrepresentations in order to induce Bukstel and VitaminSpice to work with Hand, sign
contracts, and permit Counter-Defendants to own and trade VitaminSpice stock.
113. As a direct and proximate cause of Hand’s and Counter-Defendants’
misrepresentations and concealments, Bukstel and VitaminSpice have suffered damages far in
excess of $75,000.00.
SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(Against Counter-Defendants and Third-Party Defendant Hand_
Negligent Misrepresentation
114. Bukstel and VitaminSpice reallege paragraphs 1 through 113 of their
Counterclaims and Third-Party claims as though they were fully set forth herein.
115. Hand and Counter-Defendants made false statements of material facts to Bukstel
and VitaminSpice in connection with the purchase and sale of VitaminSpice securities. In
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 33 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
34
4823-7140-0465.1
particular, Hand and Counter-Defendants made false statements that Hand was an objective and
independent attorney who would work on behalf of, and in the interest of, VitaminSpice; that
Hand had no direct relationship with Counter-Defendants; that Hand did not have control over
Counter-Defendants; and that Hand was not involved in the control and trading of VitaminSpice
stock.
116. Hand and Counter-Defendants also concealed material facts from Bukstel and
VitaminSpice in connection with the purchase and sale of VitaminSpice stock. In particular,
Hand and Counter-Defendants concealed the facts that Hand did not work on behalf of, and in the
interest of, VitaminSpice; that Hand had a direct relationship with Counter-Defendants; that Hand
had control over Counter-Defendants; that Hand was involved in the control and trading of
VitaminSpice stock; that Hand profited from Counter-Defendants’ VitaminSpice transactions;
and that Hand worked and conspired with Stalt to allow Counter-Defendants to continue trading
VitaminSpice stock.
117. Bukstel and VitaminSpice reasonably relied on the misrepresentations and
concealments by Hand and Counter-Defendants by, among other things, retaining Hand, agreeing
to proceed with the reverse merger, and allowing Hand to engineer the various transactions in
which Counter-Defendants secured their shares of VitaminSpice stock. If Bukstel and
VitaminSpice would have known the truth, they would never had retained Hand as
VitaminSpice’s counsel and/or proceeded with the reverse merger and transactions with Hand and
Counter-Defendants.
118. Hand and Counter-Defendants made these concealments and misrepresentations
negligently, since they knew or should have known and disclosed the truth.
119. As a direct and proximate cause of Hand’s and Counter-Defendants’
misrepresentations and concealments, Bukstel and VitaminSpice have suffered damages far in
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 34 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
35
4823-7140-0465.1
excess of $75,000.00.
SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(Against Third-Party Defendant Hand)_
Breaches of Fiduciary Duties
120. Bukstel and VitaminSpice reallege paragraphs 1 though 119 of their
Counterclaims and Third-Party claims as though they were fully set forth herein.
121. As VitaminSpice’s attorney, Hand owed a fiduciary duties to VitaminSpice,
including without limitation the duty to act loyally and/or to avoid conflicts of interest.
122. Hand breached his fiduciary duties in multiple independent respects. First, Hand
breached his fiduciary duties by acting in his interests, which were opposed to the interests of
VitaminSpice, Bukstel, and other company officers and shareholders. Hand did so by ensuring
that only he – and/or his other “clients,” who were shell companies with VitaminSpice stock
issued in their name – could freely trade VitaminSpice stock whereas other VitaminSpice
shareholders could not. Hand accomplished this gross breach of his fiduciary duty by falsely
informing Stalt, the transfer agent, that VitaminSpice was not – and never was – a shell company.
That falsity caused Stalt to issue free-trading VitaminSpice shares to Hand’s controlled
VitaminSpice shareholders, but not to his client VitaminSpice or Bukstel, ensuring that only the
former could trade and profit from VitaminSpice stock.
123. Hand also breached his fiduciary duties by exacting control over the float of
VitaminSpice stock and trading the stock on behalf of his controlled persons and entities. Hand
also engaged in a pump-and-dump scheme that caused the price of VitaminSpice stock – and
VitaminSpice’s market value – to drop drastically to levels from which it has never recovered.
This misconduct breached Hand’s fiduciary duties to VitaminSpice, Bukstel and other officers
and shareholders, and caused them to suffer substantial damages.
124. Hand also breached his fiduciary duties by, among other things, acting on behalf of
Case 2:11-cv-03718-MMB Document 46 Filed 10/11/12 Page 35 of 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
36
4823-7140-0465.1
himself and Counter-Defendants rather than VitaminSpice; engaging in and concealing numerous
conflicts of interest from VitaminSpice; working with Counter-Defendants to profit from the
acquisition and sale of VitaminSpice stock; shredding VitaminSpice’s documents; and using
VitaminSpice’s confidential information and attorney-client communications improperly,
including to file this action, in gross violation of his ethical duties.
125. As a direct and proximate cause of Hand’s breaches of fiduciary duties, Bukstel
and VitaminSpice have suffered damages far in excess of $75,000.00.
WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, Bukstel and VitaminSpice respectfully
request that the Court enter judgment in their favor and against Hand and Counter-Defendants for
compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial, but in excess of $75,000.00, and such
other relief as the Court deems just and appropriate under the circumstances.
Dated: October 11, 2011
Its looks like the web site has been updated. So we should hear about some retail chains soon.
its on the Federal court PACER system.
https://ecf.paeb.uscourts.gov/doc1/152119546503
You have to get a PACER account and login
Looks like the creditor's motion was granted to put the company back in bankruptcy. I have not see the company put out a correcting press release, but I am not holding my breath.
Glad to see things continue to go well here;)
Here is where all the lawsuits are, according to the publicly available court records
The Pennsylvania securities fraud lawsuit was in suspension but for some strange reason Bukstel decided to revive it. The parties are in discovery. Bukstel and VitaminSpice countersued the plaintiffs, and the motion to dismiss the counterclaim is pending for a couple of months. The judge already dismissed the counterclaim, so this is probably Bukstel's and VitaminSpice's last chance.
In the bankruptcy action, the creditors filed a motion to reconsider the dismissal. It is still pending and if the motion is granted the company could be back in bankruptcy.
The Pennsylvania note collection case is still pending and the plaintiff has filed for summary judgment against VitaminSpice based on the fact that the bankruptcy judge found that the note was valid. The amount is for about $80,000 I think.
The collection case in California by the former attorney Buus resulting in a default last March and a writ of execution was issued. The amount is about $15,000
The Hand collection lawsuit resulted in a default judgment for about $70,000, but VitaminSpice got the default vacated. Its pretty easy to vacate a default if attended to properly. No trial date has been set and the parties are probably doing discovery.
Trial will probably be set for later this year
The Hand defamation lawsuit also resulted in a default but VitaminSpice and Ed were able to vacate the default last month.
Bukstel's sworn affidavit he provided to get the default vacated was pretty funny. He claimed that he never got served with the lawsuit and he only "recently" learned of the lawsuit. That is hilarious given that he tried in May to move the case to the federal courts; how is that he did not get served nor know of the lawsuit? Also he issued a press release in May saying he was going to vigorously defend against the suit. Then how can he say that he did not know about it?
Hand has moved for summary judgment and the hearing is in March.
Ed and VitaminSpice have not filed any reply.
Reports are that the company has been evicted from its offices, does anyone know if this is true?
Here is where all the lawsuits are, according to the publicly available court records
The Pennsylvania securities fraud lawsuit was in suspension but for some strange reason Bukstel decided to revive it. The parties are in discovery. Bukstel and VitaminSpice countersued the plaintiffs, and the motion to dismiss the counterclaim is pending for a couple of months. The judge already dismissed the counterclaim, so this is probably Bukstel's and VitaminSpice's last chance.
In the bankruptcy action, the creditors filed a motion to reconsider the dismissal. It is still pending and if the motion is granted the company could be back in bankruptcy.
The Pennsylvania note collection case is still pending and the plaintiff has filed for summary judgment against VitaminSpice based on the fact that the bankruptcy judge found that the note was valid. The amount is for about $80,000 I think.
The collection case in California by the former attorney Buus resulting in a default last March and a writ of execution was issued. The amount is about $15,000
The Hand collection lawsuit resulted in a default judgment for about $70,000, but VitaminSpice got the default vacated. Its pretty easy to vacate a default if attended to properly. No trial date has been set and the parties are probably doing discovery.
Trial will probably be set for later this year
The Hand defamation lawsuit also resulted in a default but VitaminSpice and Ed were able to vacate the default last month.
Bukstel's sworn affidavit he provided to get the default vacated was pretty funny. He claimed that he never got served with the lawsuit and he only "recently" learned of the lawsuit. That is hilarious given that he tried in May to move the case to the federal courts; how is that he did not get served nor know of the lawsuit? Also he issued a press release in May saying he was going to vigorously defend against the suit. Then how can he say that he did not know about it?
Hand has moved for summary judgment and the hearing is in March.
Ed and VitaminSpice have not filed any reply.
Reports are that the company has been evicted from its offices, does anyone know if this is true?
Happy New Year fellow VTMS'ers. Lets hope for better days in 2013! If we have one thing going for us here with VTMS it is time. Being that these Suits were filed well back in 2012 I would suspect we hear some finality to them in the upcoming year.
Agreed. With the very low SS VTMS can move very easy and fast as we saw on the day of their Dimissal from BK. Time is on our side now IMO as the Civil Court Case is now over 6 months old. Eventually we will see some finality to this one way or the other. Still holding my shares.
Followers
|
32
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
1223
|
Created
|
06/13/08
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Contact Info996 Old Eagle School RoadSuite 1102Wayne, PA 1908
Website: http://www.vitaminspice.net
996 Old Eagle School Road
Suite 1102
Wayne, PA 19087
Website: http://www.vitaminspice.net
Phone: 481-367-7401
Phone: 481-367-74
Shares Outstanding | 155,234,664 a/o Sep 30, 2011 | |
Float | 14,706,129 a/o Sep 30, 2011 | |
Authorized Shares | Not Available | |
Par Value | No Par Value |
Shareholders of Record | 85 | a/o Apr 15, 2011 |
WAYNE, Pa., April 25, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- VitaminSpice, Inc. (PINKSHEETS: VTMS) announces that the Federal Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has dismissed the involuntary bankruptcy petition that was filed against the company by its former attorney Jehu Hand, Ray Suprenard (IBT Florida), Jeremiah Hand, John Robison (Orange, California), and Esthetics World.
The Honorable Court further ordered that a Hearing be held regarding attorneys fees and damages. Furthermore, the Court Ordered that a Hearing be scheduled to hear VitaminSpice's "Bad Faith" Motion regarding the Filing of the petition. The Motions filed before this court included explicit documents provided to the court that demonstrated forgeries by petitioners, specifically Jehu Hand. One of the most outrageous documents that VitaminSpice provided is a back dated and notarized (by Jehu Hand's assistant, Kimberly Peterson) that was submitted to the offices of The United States Federal Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania's District Court Judge, Michael Baylson.
During the proceedings, petitioner John Robison admitted to providing investment funds via Kevin Lee Woodbridge, a convicted felon on securities violations. According to the SEC website, Woodbridge was banned for life from working with any public company in addition to Woodbridge's incarceration.
The Court will schedule a separate hearing to allow the parties to augment the present record with regard to the issue of whether VitaminSpice is entitled to fees and costs pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section 303(i). At that time, the Court will consider the issue of bad faith as it relates to VitaminSpice's section 303(i) requests, stated the Judge Madeline D. Coleman in documents issued by the court. VitaminSpice, by and through its attorneys will be submitting actual, compensatory, and punitive damage claims against all parties that filed the involuntary petition.
About VitaminSpiceVitaminSpice is uniquely positioned between the $150 billion health food/vitamin supplement industry and the multi-trillion-dollar traditional food industry. A pioneer in the emerging FoodCeutical Industry, VitaminSpice sells vitamin-, mineral- and antioxidant-infused spices and food products. Their offerings include Crushed Red Pepper, Ground Black Pepper, Italian Seasoning, Ground Cinnamon and Granulated Garlic. A proprietary micro-encapsulation process keeps vitamin properties locked inside, even when heated, allowing the seasonings, condiments, and food products to retain their full flavor.
VitaminSpice Safe HarborThis News Release may contain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove correct.
Contact:Edward BukstelCEOVitaminSpice, Inc.ebukstel@vitaminspice.net 484.367.7401
SOURCE VitaminSpice, Inc.
www.prnewswire.com
Copyright (C) 2012 PR Newswire. All rights reserved
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |