United Health Products Inc (UEEC)

[Zorax]

I have noted many times that this company writes deliberately vague PRs.
I am the only one that seems to be able to read them with an open mind and interpret them correctly.

No, but you are the only one with that type of pumping prose. Interesting, but self gratification publicly is boring. Although the legend in my own mind spiel is amusing.

Daily defensive convolutions of press releases isn't all that revolutionary. Nor particularly conductive to pushing up the pps.

Another employee perhaps? Y'all ganging up on shoon or anyone else bringing documented corporate info of the history of inefficiency of this scam penny stock is transparent.

[Waverunners]

They have had one PMA that made it to the in depth review stage.
It was deemed Not Approvable.
Conditions were not met in a timely manner.
March 21 new application submitted.
We will now wait for UHP to let us know if/when it is filed.
It will then move to the substantive review.

I suggest you go back and read every single one of my posts.

Zorax too.

You’re never too old to learn from the master.

[shoondale]

Multiple PMA rejections? With the reasons unverifiable except for UHP's word? With no copy of the FDA rejection distributed to shareholders? Do I have that right?

[shoondale]

Funny Thom lists his association with Waveny Partners on his Butler write up, listed at his home address on a separate webpage, but doesn't list CEO of UHP in his Butler write up. It is confusing. On the other hand, Thom is listed as part of Butler's Capital Placement Team.

On another wavelength, I always wondered how this stock price is so substantially high given UHP's performance over more than decade. No one ever explains any of this on this website. They just get angry.

[Waverunners]

They have outlined the reasons it was Not Approvable in PRs. At least to the extent required.
Unfortunately, they weren’t able to correct the issues in a timely manner and therefore put in the position of a new submission.

I have noted many times that this company writes deliberately vague PRs.
I am the only one that seems to be able to read them with an open mind and interpret them correctly.

[shoondale]

Yes, among one lie after another. And notice the shipper had to even make a payout on the transfer of the material. I'm very curious who UHP has been in discussions with all these years for mergers and acquisitions. Notice there is never disclosure of employees. Could there be a few who only post on the internet?

One thing that substantially bothers me, is the desperation from certain parties, starting with the one who always threatens me, to raise the stock price through the use of the internet rather than focusing on the company's actions.

[Zorax]

Is thom the brokerage guy. Would his brokerage deem it proper to be promoting his own company and selling stock while on brokers time from his own account?

[Zorax]

Should I drop it a couple of grades just for you?

[Zorax]

But wasn't their try a lie about false sales of a non existent pallet of product?

[shoondale]

Not approvable on what grounds? That little detail matters. And is it verifiable? Going back to 2017 there have been multiple rejections. What are the grounds for each? And the public has never been notified to my knowledge. And I am noticing you are selective in which questions get answered and which are ignored. Employees? Who worked on or modified this gauze or packaging? This is fishy? Was it Thom? Is he the only employee? Did he take a leave on his position at Butler?

[Waverunners]

Whoa, total burn!

Have you ever heard a person that can “speak to an issue.”

One doesn’t say/type “I can text/write to that issue.”

Are you filling in for Trusttheman with grade school logic?

[Waverunners]

Their last PMA was deemed Not Approvable. Hence, the new PMA submission with updated product testing.

[shoondale]

Who are the employees? I am not coming up with a functional company in any form?

[shoondale]

I'm coming up with WA state residence for the former CEO. Maybe NV is a second address. This kind of goes against the theory he is out of the picture, doesn't it? Big acquisition? That has been talked about for years. Have you ever seen any of the FDA rejections of previous PMA's? None of their explanations are verifiable. If this product worked so well; why didn't the dabs they put on band-aids sell over the counter? They did try. The SEC indictment demonstrates the attempts.

[Zorax]

I will answer you this time, as I know I am the only one qualified to speak intelligently on the topic:

lol.
By the way, this is a forum board in text only.

[Waverunners]

I will answer you this time, as I know I am the only one qualified to speak intelligently on the topic:

Zero Capital Gains in Nevada.

Their original office was in Nevada.
Former CEO and majority shareholder continues to live in Nevada. Hence, they may as well keep a PO Box and hope to go tax free after the big acquisition.

BTW I exposed the Uhaul location years ago.

[Zorax]

Perhaps you should peruse the SEC site to research what the penalties are for a owner/principal promoting their own stock in public venues?
Without disclosing they own the company or stock?

[shoondale]

Just curious, are you going to go back and retract all the posts you have made that have resulted in misleading people? You might find many.

[shoondale]

Mistake...TX and NV are different states with Mesquite towns. This is a correction of mistake thinking Richard Rodriquez worked in the same town as UHP headquarters

[Zorax]

And you'll have to prove damages. Stuff like this is where the internet is amazing for data. And didn't you write yesterday claiming to be your last post? It's called lack of integrity and credibility.

Types of Defamation Lawsuits

There are actually two types of claims you could make in a defamation lawsuit. You could allege the defendant committed libel or committed slander. While the elements of both are similar, the key difference relates to how the false statement was made.
Libel

If a false statement is made in written form, it is considered libel. Both print and digital communication can be classified as libel, as can written statements and pictures.

Any false statements printed in books or newspapers, or made on websites, blogs or social media pages, could potentially give rise to a libel claim.
Slander

Slander refers to spoken defamation. If a false statement of fact is made orally rather than in written form, it is considered slander.

However, there has become some confusion over the distinction between written and oral statements due to advancing technology. Podcasts and text messages, for example, could potentially be seen as similar to phone calls and therefore false statements would be considered slander. However, some argue they are more like written material in which case the false statements would be considered libel.

https://www.forbes.com/advisor/legal/personal-injury/defamation-lawsuit-guide/

[shoondale]

True there. My mistake. But what is UHP headquarters doing at a u-haul dealer building in the desert and where are the employees? No one ever gets any answers. The stock price has slid down over 90% since its peak less than 5 years ago while these questions go unanswered.

[Waverunners]

You thought you were on to something big there, but …..different towns…different states.

Nothing gets past me.

You’re welcome Rodster.

[shoondale]

Please explain why you rely so much on the internet chatter of this board? Why is this of extreme importance to you?

"if any information is false and misleading"

You can also point us to any posts you have placed that have ever proved true. Just one?
Seems to me, someone might have some explaining to do to individuals that have been ripped off. And that someone may be you instead of me.

CHARLIESAN
Re: rodman post# 12756
Tuesday, December 19, 2023 12:11:04 PM
Post# 12757 of 13460
"Yes, I am a loser; about 800K in this position; and I own a significant amount of shares; in the 7 digits. You must be braindead to think that this CEO and management team do not deserve criticism in their inability to get a PMA filed. They need prodded; pushed; criticized; by any means necessary to accomplish their duties. So you will stand by another year and watch paint dry? Their communication and actions are a travesty and reek of incompetence. Calling it like it is. If you cannot see this you might look in the mirror before denigrating others."

Maybe it is time to rethink who is providing false and misleading information. You have quite a history.

[shoondale]

6...Can anyone name an actual employee working_at_this_UHP_stock_scam??

[rodman]

And you will find yourself in a dafamation law suit if any information is false and misleading. My lawsuit I will file will have to get in line behind others!

[shoondale]

5...Nothing screams manipulated stock scam louder!!!!!!!!!!!

[shoondale]

4...wtf is uhp headquarters doing in the same small town as a cpa, pipng off utter bullshit on this board, across the country from the supposed CEO? This town is in the middle of the desert surrounding by nothing. And why would a stockbroker, working for a capital management firm, be CEO of a magic bandage firm?

[Waverunners]

Trust, I’ve noticed that you’re getting in the habit of posting right after me and pretending you didn’t see my post.
Hilarious, your childish behaviour is beyond compare.
Anyway, when you’re private messaging with dr5 in 3 minutes, tell him I’m waiting for a response.

[shoondale]

3...An internet search of the Riishard Rodriguez CPA leads to the following address:

Richard Rodriquez, CPA
4355 I-30 Suite 102
Mesquite, TX, 75150
(I-30 West Service Rd.)

http://www.richrodriguezcpa.com/contact-us/

[trusttheman]

You guys are funny. Rodman, this is not your last post. Ignore Ihub, they rarely take things down now, because all the posters know that they’re just a vehicle for stock bashers to help banks and hedge funds companies, keep stocks lower. They’re losing posters every single week. Now, we wait for FDA approval which we will get. Then, bashers can suck it.

[Waverunners]

dr5, when you come out of hiding I would like to know your motivation for posting 510k timelines and not the PMA.

UHP press release clearly states this Is a full PMA and went so far as to provide the FDA link to the PMA process. Literally inviting readers to follow along with the timeline. There is no confusion here at all. Yet, you did your “research” on the 510k.
How desperate are you? The sad thing is no one else here would notice.
But you must have realized I would expose you.

Here’s the Company quote:

The company confirms that it has submitted via the FDA eSTAR portal its Premarket Approval (PMA) application for its absorbable hemostatic gauze, which will now be reviewed by the FDA and Health Canada. Information on the FDA review process for PMA applications can be found on the FDA website at:
https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/premarket-approval-pma/pma-review-process.

…..please don’t try to explain that the two are interchangeable and Hemostyp was fast tracked into the 510k process .

[shoondale]

Important videos for anyone wanting to understand this stock and how these people operate:
Charles Ponzi The Documentary
Madoff: The Monster of Wall Street
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Inventor:_Out_for_Blood_in_Silicon_Valley
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8488126/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_Money_(2018_TV_series)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7889220/
Victor Lustig: The King of Con Men who Sold the Eiffel Tower

[shoondale]

"detriment" to the 🖕Ponzi Scheme Operators🖕 with honest and factual posts hindering them from bilking people out of their savings by making them aware of the bullshit they are being fed by thieving lowlifes

[shoondale]

Not Green, just dirty brokers using clients' money to give the illusion there is interest in this scam. Then they sell out from underneath any sucker who falls for it and buys. Actually it is down over 90% in less than 5 years. Just click on the 5 year timeline in this chart: https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/UEEC/.

[rodman]

Do your due diligence in evaluating any stock investment! UEEC has submitted their FDA PMA device III information and is
awaiting confirmation and FDA reply!
$5-$10++

[shoondale]

"has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern"

"Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. This could make it more difficult for us to raise funds and adversely affect our relationships with creditors, investors and suppliers."

"We have identified various material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting which could affect our ability to timely and accurately report our results of operations and financial condition. These material weaknesses may not have been fully remediated as of the filing date of this report and we cannot assure you that other material weaknesses will not be identified in the future."

direct from the 10-K
Only absolute fools would not heed this warning!!!!🙊🙉🙈 Shareholders are being played for total suckers by dirty brokers, who populate this board and spew absurd bullshit running a scam from start to finish. The share price is nothing more than a shell game of other people's money. The so-called CEO is nothing more than a broker spearheading this fictitious company.
https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/4231884
He doesn't want any of his clients to know he spearheads this stock scam
https://www.butlercap.com/our-team-2
The so-called headquarters is merely a u-haul dealer, on the other side of the country, in the middle of the desert.
UHP headquarters
Furthermore, they have already been indicted for fraud.
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2022/comp25413.pdf

"FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section IO(b) and Rule 10b-5 Thereunder
(UHP and Beplate)
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section I0(b) and Rules IOb-S(a) and (c) Thereunder
(Schiliro)
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Aiding and Abetting Violations of Exchange Act Section lO(b) and Rule 10b-5(b)
(Schiliro)
FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Securities Act Section 17(a)
(All Defendants)
FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B)
of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 Thereunder
(UHP)
SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Aiding and Abetting Violations of Exchange Act Section 13(a),
13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)2)B), and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13
(Beplate and Schiliro)
SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violation of Section 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rule 13b2-1
(Beplate and Schiliro)
EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section 13(a) and Rule 13a-14 Thereunder
(Beplate)
NINTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Rule 13b2-2 of the Exchange Act
(Beplate and Schiliro)
TENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 304(a)
(Beplate)
ELEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Violations of Exchange Act Section 16(a) and Rule 16a-3 Thereunder
(Beplate)

[shoondale]

"Public company compliance requirements may make it more difficult to attract and retain of officers and directors"

Same tired, worn out bullshit for over a decade

[shoondale]

"

Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. This could make it more difficult for us to raise funds and adversely affect our relationships with creditors, investors and suppliers."

Same tired, worn out bullshit for over a decade

[budgetthis]

Looks like another Green Day.

[shoondale]

"We have identified various material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting which could affect our ability to timely and accurately report our results of operations and financial condition. These material weaknesses may not have been fully remediated as of the filing date of this report and we cannot assure you that other material weaknesses will not be identified in the future."

Same tired, worn out bullshit for over a decade

[shoondale]

"We may not be able to adequately protect our technologies or intellectual property rights"

Same tired, worn out bullshit for over a decade

[shoondale]

"Our business may suffer if we do not attract and retain talented personnel"

Same tired, worn out bullshit for over a decade

[shoondale]

"We are currently dependent on one hemostatic gauze product to generate income in the future"

Same tired, worn out bullshit for over a decade

[shoondale]

"We could experience difficulties in our supply chain"
Same tired, worn out bullshit for over a decade

[shoondale]

"We may be dependent upon commercial relationships to conduct our operations and implement our strategy."

Same tired, worn out bullshit for over a decade

[shoondale]

"No guarantee of market acceptance."

Same tired, worn out bullshit for over a decade

[shoondale]

"We will need additional financing to execute our business plan and fund operations, which may not be available"

Same tired, worn out bullshit for over a decade

[shoondale]

"We can provide no assurances that ongoing discussions with potential commercial partners and acquirers will result in the occurrence of a specific
transaction."

Same tired, worn out bullshit for over a decade

[shoondale]

"No assurances can be given that our plans to penetrate certain market segments will be successful."

Same tired, worn out bullshit for over a decade

[shoondale]

"

We can provide no assurances that our Class III application for internal surgical procedures in the U.S. market will be approved by the FDA."

Same tired, worn out bullshit for over a decade