Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Actually, that was a new one on me about leasing. About two months ago Johnson & Johnson sued the FDA 1.3 trillion for NOT leasing 4 of their plants for them.
I didn't put the dots together and knew that UHP was in such an incredible position with the FDA. This changes everything.
Haven't you heard Zorax? The FDA is so impressed with hemoshit that they are fully funding the manufacturing plant, which will dwarf the GM and Ford assembly plants in MI and OH. In fact they are spending their entire budget. There are 100 priests, 100 rabbis, 100 pastors, 100 imams, 100 nuns, and 100 monks volunteering around the clock to erect the manufacturing plant. During the clinical trials, doctors were just touching the hemoshit to foreheads of paraplegics and patients who had spent their lifetime in wheelchairs and they all got up dancing. This is pure fact. Buy!! Buy!!!! BUY!!!!!!!!...and get rich, Rich, RICH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"we doubt that shareholders will hear about it. We expect it will be just like when UEEC applied for PMA approval for Class III in late 2017, there will just not be any updates, like it never happened."
Who are you leaving your shares to chrism0000? The PMA was filed in frikkin 2017. I've posted the evidence many times. Are you this dense? It failed many, many years ago. Can you name one employee that is not purely a Ponzi Scheme Operator (those happen to be these internet con men running this boiler room)? The product is a sham and no functional company exists.
Chris I hear you!!! I’m sitting on a huge position nothing would make Me happier than an approval and someone that has interest in our product.. I’m just being very realistic and the end I’m sure will justify the means.. Good luck
NOOOOO!!!!! MORE!!!!!!!! WAITING!!!!!!!!!!!!
What would be nice would be if everyone would admit that we have a lot of things that are unknown to us and we don’t have the answers.. we have some bulls that are optimistic and we have a couple of bashers that will never admit the agenda they have.. will never disclose if they’re long or short or even have a position.. whatever the case I’m pretty sure we’ll be finding things out in time to come.. maybe a month maybe 6 months.. I’ve waited years I can wait another year if I have to
This coming from someone who has been dead_wrong in every single post he has made going back to the start of ihub (and speaking to someone who posted accurate and honest information). This coming from someone who has misled anyone, at every turn, who has been naive and gullible enough to pay credence to him. Can you name one single post of yours that has been accurate and came true? Just one? You have the most lack of self-awareness of anyone that ever lived. Even a bull with chronic diarrhea would be duly impressed with what you spew.
"Your full of shit!"
bull·shit
/'boolSHit/
VULGAR SLANG
noun
stupid or untrue talk or writing; nonsense.
verb
talk nonsense to (someone), typically to be misleading or deceptive.
Your full of shit!
$5-$10++
In fact,the FDA which leased the company the manufacturing plant has been carrying the company to the finish line.
Classic, when all your data proves a lie, attack the members.
Totally agree! FDA has had the PMA in inventory and worked on two or more occasions. No need to reinvent the wheel.
Don’t know Chris. But what I do know is that it’s not a new application and the 180 day clock in no way, shape or form has been reset. It could be a couple weeks, it could be three months but I’m pretty sure the FDA is not gonna want their new application to take a long time which would make their new system look completely stupid.
Chris, a belated Happy Birthday.
I wasn’t posting in March so I missed it.
I’m sure it’s been a long two years since dr5 promised you a happy birthday gift of approval. Hopefully, you didn’t believe his empty promise:
DR5
Re: Chrism0000 post# 8244
Sunday, 01/09/2022 1:57:57 PM
Your birthday present will come well before that.
And now here we are in 2024 and he’s still trying to make “educated guesses”
This coming from someone who has dead wrong in every single post going back to the start of ihub. Can you name one single post of yours that has been accurate and came true? Just one? What happened to following your own advice before advising others?
"Enough of your BS!"
bull·shit
/'boolSHit/
VULGAR SLANG
noun
stupid or untrue talk or writing; nonsense.
verb
talk nonsense to (someone), typically to be misleading or deceptive.
CHARLIESAN
Re: rodman post# 12756
Tuesday, December 19, 2023 12:11:04 PM
Post# 12757 of 13460
"Yes, I am a loser; about 800K in this position; and I own a significant amount of shares; in the 7 digits. You must be braindead to think that this CEO and management team do not deserve criticism in their inability to get a PMA filed. They need prodded; pushed; criticized; by any means necessary to accomplish their duties. So you will stand by another year and watch paint dry? Their communication and actions are a travesty and reek of incompetence. Calling it like it is. If you cannot see this you might look in the mirror before denigrating others."
Lol. The only thing I want to know is, will we be making money before the end of this summer? LOL
"The Bull Shit Detection Rules
No1: Wherever possible there must be INDEPENDENT unbiased confirmation of the “facts.”
That means any research trial published that shows an effect or not needs to be reproduced by another independent party BEFORE we can claim there is or isn’t an effect.
No2: Encourage open honest and substantive debate on the evidence by proponents from ALL sides. This means open, honest, transparent, public debate and discourse is needed by all interested parties regardless of their position or standing, and not only limited to just those with affiliations or connections in closed and private meetings.
No3: Arguments from an authority carry little weight.
Authorities have made mistakes in the past, and they will do so again in the future. There are NO authorities; at most, there are experts, but this still does not make them immune from questioning or challenging.
No4: If there’s something to be explained, think of ALL the different ways in which it could be explained. Think of tests you could do that might systematically DISPROVE the alternatives. What survives among the “multiple hypotheses,” has a much better chance of being the right answer than the first idea that caught your fancy.
No5: Do not to get overly ATTACHED to a hypothesis just because it’s yours.
Ask yourself why you like the idea. Compare it fairly with ALL the alternatives. See if you can find reasons for REJECTING it. If you don’t, others will.
No6: Quantify it.
If whatever it is you’re explaining has some measure, you’ll be much better able to discriminate among competing hypotheses. What is vague and qualitative is open to MANY explanations. Of course there are truths to be sought in qualitative issues, but finding them is more challenging.
No7: Every link in the chain must work (including the premise)
If there is a chain of event or procedures that have to occur to arrive at a result they must all be reproducible, not just most of them. Even if one part of a chain can not be repeated then the result can not be trusted.
No8: Occam’s Razor always applies.
When faced with two hypotheses that explain the data/outcome equally well the SIMPLER one is usually always more correct.
No9: Is the hypothesis FALSIFIABLE?
Ideas and theories that are untestable are not worth much. Others must be given the chance to try and duplicate your experiments to see if they get the same result."
Lol. The only thing I want to know is, will we be making money before the end of this summer? LOL
As always you are wrong Trust.
Sporty was replying to your reply to Zorax. If I thought he was replying about my posts I would certainly have replied to him.
Don’t worry you’ll be right eventually.
Yep, I suggest you put him on ignore. I don't remember exactly what it was but I remember him making up some b.s. story right before a summer holiday. Did it deliberately to try and ruin it for people because he's a miserable, mean spirited, a-hole. Originally, he was right about things. As time went on he started to expose himself as a fraud and was stretching everything to cause panic. He started to take things that were general time frames and started talking about them like they were absolutes. Reaching to scare long term shareholders. He's been trying get people to believe the FDA would reset the 180 clock forever and he has failed miserably. It never happened and never will. The eStar application is a complete application. Not a new application. The FDA is not going to go over 10,000 pages of documentation and everything they signed off on again. It would make them look ridiculous and isn't cost effective for them do so. They also aren't going to want to take that amount of time after the company used their new system which is supposed to make the whole submittal and approval process much faster. Not to mention Surgicrap is a black eye for the FDA which has caused them nothing but problems. I've always thought he had an axe to grind with the company. He was hinting about Thom's salary for a while which is amusing since according to BT, hasn't been paid in a long, long, time. His avenue to create panic with shareholders has always centered around the FDA. That's his gig. After the holiday b.s. story he made up, I don't listen to anything he has to say and will not do so going forward.
Ah the good old days in 2019,
trusttheman
Re: JHOGG post# 2083
Thursday, 02/07/2019 8:21:30 PM
Just shut your holes already. Just wait and relax. Jesus. You still don't know what you own. Wait and get rich. Insane product. Brilliant CEO. Let the moron doubters lose millions.
Here’s Trust’s educated analysis of how long human trials would take.
I was just a quiet and patient observer at the time. But the lemmings on here just kept letting him bully them.
Of course his two week timeline was absolute insanity and it took 2 years to submit the outcomes. DR5 thought 1-2 months max:
trusttheman
Re: DR5 post# 1491
Monday, 08/13/2018 10:25:40 AM
I'm thinking a week or two. Not a month or two. Way, way, too long. There is no reason for it to go that long.
ABSOLUTELY CORRECT SIR.
Those of us here cannot be dissuaded from our unified conviction of UEEC and their life saving products soon to be PMA APPROVED.
What?
My 2023 post ruined everyone’s long weekend.
Pretty sure that would mean that everyone is listening.
Also, like all my posts it was accurate.
I stand by the statement that I believe they are cutting and packaging in USA with Hemostyp made elsewhere…likely original China plant. Though UHP has never said that.
Here’s my awesome post you’re always whining about.
I have just reread it. Thank you for reminding me of its absolute genius:
Waverunners
Re: None
Friday, 05/26/2023 1:01:58 PM
I have a feeling we will soon learn that UHP has abandoned their quest to produce Hemostyp in the USA. Hence, the emphasis that now the Cutting and packaging is happening in a USA plant, not the manufacturing.
Could be wrong (doubtful) but Either way, using two facilities seems like a logistical nightmare for a company like UHP and it is my assumption that this is a huge part of why the testing has returned unsatisfactory results which they essentially admitted.
These changes wreak havoc on the original PMA and were the reasons I stated repeatedly that major amendments were needed.
Just for weekendBBQ UEEC talking points. Hot take predictions:
$2-3.50 With PMA
12+ months to PMA decision
24 months to acquisition.
In the mean time UHP May be presented a low ball offer of approximately $0.48.
This excludes potential pump and dumps.
Have a tremendous weekend. And RELAX a little.
Jackass who literally has never been right about anything he has ever posted going back many, many years accusing someone else of BS. How hilarious in it's hypocrisy.
Enough of your BS!
Wave you sad, little man. We all know you're a fraud. Educated? If you had an education, you would consistently admit when you are wrong. One, you were wrong about the PMA. Two, you pulled that classless stunt with that nonsense before the summer holiday which was complete b.s and you were made to look the fool. Oh, that's right. Did you think we forgot about your douchebag move right before the holiday when you tried to ruin everybody's break? That's pretty much when longs thought you were a tool. You spent two years trying to sell people that the FDA was going to reset the 180 clock which never happened. In fact,the FDA which leased the company the manufacturing plant has been carrying the company to the finish line. Then, you quote some generic crap about 180 days when you know it doesn't mean anything. The FDA can approve way before that or even after that. The FDA has reviewed over 10,000 pages of documentation. Yet, you're so clueless that you think they will do that again which makes absolutely no sense. Crawl back under your rock. You lost all credibility after your summer holiday scam story which was all b.s. Nobody here sold. No longs here are listening to you.
There is no third party you pathological imbecile. Provide a link. You can't because it's all fabricated bullshit. You'll be regurgitating this PMA bullshit again in 2026 or 2027.
Enough of your BS! You obviously do not procedure but our third party consultant does. Blame yourself for getting in this mess if that's how you see it.
I will be going to the bank with my sales proceeds!
$5-$10++
I’ll use a story from Trust’s life to help explain that there’s no fast track for failing the first time.
When young 12 yr old trust was entering 3rd grade for the fourth time, his parents asked the teacher “how long will it take this year?”
To which, the teacher replied “Trust will have to complete the entire year . No short cuts.”
Of course the parents were outraged. Expecting that since Trust already spent 3 years failing that he should get preferential treatment.
“I’m sorry, but Trust’s inability to complete the required learnings does not grant him special treatment. Believe me, I want him out of this class more than anything. But, we must follow the guidelines. “
Long story short - Trust never did get out of that class. He eventually grew to be an uneducated Trusttheman.
Hopefully the same fate doesn’t befall Hemostyp.
“ The fact that he disappeared for a long time when he predicted Ueec would complete the PMA in October tells you all you need to know”
You got me. Yes I thought they could actually complete and submit a PMA amendment in a timely manner. Especially when UHP wrote:
July 15, 2022
we conclude that the validation of certain elements of our manufacturing process are necessary to assemble a complete portfolio of information that the FDA can then use to complete its review our PMA application. We will work expeditiously with our manufacturing partner in the coming weeks to accomplish these remaining tasks.”
So ya you’re right. When a CEO states “in the coming weeks”. and the full application isn’t submitted for 21 months even I missed on how useless this company is at working “expeditiously”.
So you’ve exposed that when the CEO doesn’t complete his tasks as he says he will, it’s my fault.
And a logical (in Trust’s world) conclusion is that this would make me a short.
And by stating accurate factual FDA information I am creating a panic.
Well, that all makes sense. Good work.
Rich is rodman you moron.
"But what is the most alarming to us in the 10/18/19 announcement is that the PR went silent on the very important product safety outcomes. From the UEEC clinical protocol, described on its clinicaltrials.gov page we learned about four secondary study outcomes:
Source: clinicaltrials.gov
While the Primary outcome and the Secondary outcome #1 in the UEEC study protocol are efficacy related, the Secondary #2, #3, and #4 outcomes are all safety outcomes and are of critical importance for FDA approval. The October 18th PR only addresses success of the Primary outcome and Secondary outcome #1. The PR didn't say if the study has shown a non-inferiority or superiority of HemoStyp vs Surgicel in the secondary outcomes #2-4. The history of UEEC only disclosing positive news makes us believe that the omission of results relevant to outcomes #2-4 could have been on purpose, because the clinical study likely showed the inferior performance of HemoStyp vs Surgicel in these outcome measures.
The statistician was very specific to claim non-inferiority and superiority of HemoStyp only in the initial hemostasis after application of HemoStyp to the wound. It is silent on what has happened after the initial hemostasis was achieved.
HemoStyp, according to UEEC, quickly dissolves in an aqueous environment due to its unique degradation properties. We can find this on the company’s website.
From UEEC’s product testing page:
The data obtained during analysis of sample UHP Box of 2” x 2” Pouches indicates the material begins to dissolve in water within one minute. The sample is completely dissolved within 24 hours. Not enough material remains for analysis at the 24 hour time point.
If HemoStyp dissolves too soon, the surgical wound would start bleeding again, and this would be a very serious safety issue.
Imagine a major disaster when bleeding re-occurs after the surgeon has already closed the outmost patient skin layer! The outcomes 2-4 directly address this key safety concern, describing in quantitative terms how well the initially achieved hemostasis is maintained during the surgery. Outcome 4 is about the failure of initial hemostasis, as measured in reoperations, during the one month after surgery. It seems to us that a hemostatic agent that is quick to achieve initial hemostasis, but rapidly dissolves and may frequently fail later resulting in recurrence of bleeding, is a major health hazard. Why would the FDA approve HemoStyp, if it indeed fails to maintain hemostasis, knowing that Surgicel is already a reasonably effective and safe FDA approved product?
From all these observations, we conclude that the clinical study of HemoStyp versus Surgicel was likely a failure. However, if and when its PMA application" gets rejected, we doubt that shareholders will hear about it. We expect it will be just like when UEEC applied for PMA approval for Class III in late 2017, there will just not be any updates, like it never happened.""
Plus the 180 days which is not what DR5 with his research found accurate, is a guideline. The FDA doesn't sit there and say we will take 180 days. They could finish it in two weeks or take more than 180 days. They have already reviewed 10,000 pages of documentation on HemoStyp. Wave is out of his mind if he thinks the FDA is going to do that all over again. Plus, as I said. Surgicrap is a major problem. J&J is good at covering up lawsuits with that garbage product which would never have been approved today. It was grandfathered in over 40 years ago. It's a blackeye for the FDA and has caused nothing but problems. It's so bad that other countries don't want to use it which is almost unheard of. Usually, when the FDA approves something here, other countries line up to use it. Surgicrap is not global. Fact. I went back and forth on whether Wave was long or a short. Now I can see he is a short trying to create panic. The fact that he disappeared for a long time when he predicted Ueec would complete the PMA in October tells you all you need to know. I suggest you put him on ignore as I have.
Totally agree! FDA has had the PMA in inventory and worked on two or more occasions. No need to reinvent the wheel.
The FDA has been here and knows UEEC well! "In anticipation of re-submitting updated PMA information, UHP has engaged regularly with the FDA. Through this engagement the Company was recently notified that it had been selected as the first medical device application for Premarket Approval (PMA) to be submitted and evaluated using the FDA’s electronic Submission Template and Resource (“e-STAR”) platform."
$5-$10++
He’s wrong get rich. Check Dr5’s post. Wave is suggesting that they reset the 180 clock which is total bullshit and a lie.
Rodman, you've got incredibly serious Daddy issues. All you do is keep mentioning parents. And you're an adult still infatuated by parents? This doesn't even begin to touch upon how intellectually challenged you are. Additionally you are sneaky, dishonest, and have zero sense of ethical behavior. I'm sure as a child, going to Grandma's so you could rifle her purse and leave her penniless, gave you a feeling of joy. You are so limited in your self-awareness, you don't even know enough to realize what an embarrassment you are to everyone who has the misfortune of associating with you. You are a basket case of lack of emotional development and maturity. Go ahead keep mentioning the Daddy you can't get out of your head. That, in itself, is obviously a challenge you will never overcome. Now carry on with your tantrum over not stealing enough of other people's money,
Funny you laugh but most here have jobs or comfortably retired but you
still live in your parents basement and are an unemployed basher!
Now that is sad!
$5-$10+
Bullshit. There will be one excuse after another as you scam suckers. What is this? The fifth time you clowns have run the PMA bait & switch shell game? Now you are already stretching out this leg of the scam to Halloween. ROTFLMAO. You damn well know there will never be FDA approval of a couple of crates of the cheap Chinese gauze Beplate bought a decade ago. It's hilarious watching a group of adults play pretend this a real company.
Thanks for the clarification. My apologies. I wasn't trying to misinform. I just wanted to help those poster that ask every other day if this is the day :D Just simply showing that 90 days is a realistic best case scenario. To your point, much longer typically.
Given UEEC track record, I'm leaning on the longer end of the stick.
To your point - this may be closer to a Halloween treat than an independence day victory.
Anything sooner and we will all be very pleasantly surprised.
So another SUMMER!!!!! of being POOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :(((((((((((((((((
Funny always easy to pick out the bashers who work in pairs but yet both are pennyless!
zorax and schoon were made for eaxh other. Get a real job boys you suck a this one!
$5-$10++
"Nobody here is selling"
FDA won't even look at the PMA if it's not proper. And that's where uhp keeps itself in the story. If they actually submitted a correct PMA, the FDA would process as normal no matter how many days/months it takes. The thing is UHP doesn't want the FDA to discover the fraud. So it's the 'first step' loop and your 'helpful' pumping.
All the FDA compliance nonsense looks convincing to the non fundamental trading public which is the easiest marks on the planet to sell your scam shares to.
This isn't rocket science, and neither is filling out FDA applications. In UHP it's important that that shiny new rocket is in full view of the otcm but never gets off the launch pad.
If uhp did that, they'd have to actually come up with a product. Which everyone and their sister knows they do not have. Nor do they have any interests in doing.
Nobody here is selling Zordouche. Fools like you have been trying to get people to sell this stock for the past three years and it hasn’t worked and it never will work. The only people keeping the stock down are the corrupt market makers but eventually that won’t work when they get approval. It’s over dude you lost go find another board. You’re wasting your time here.
Being wrong by mistake and wrong with intent are two different things. On a chat board it's wrong with intent. Called lying, like wave and roddy. Knowingly, for whatever their reasons.
A scam on the otcm needs at least two fundamental things. A sham product and story to sell stock and time to sell the stock. A story of governmental involvement always is one of the best schemes. In uhp, it's perpetual purposely incorrect filings and promised testing gives the story and time to unload. Blaming the system is just icing on the cake.
UHP is content in it's stories and time. Simple as that.
Pragmatic, you nailed it here. You were accurate and strong in your opinion.
Then you folded like a cheap suit.
Why would dr5 ever ever ever have more insight than what you offered.
He took your accurate information and ran it through the dr5 make believe machine.
You were right. He (of course) was wrong.
Hey GR$. Nice article. However it was focused on a range (qfm/ qih) of products that have little in common with Hemostyp.
That being said it does shed a little light on timelines.
You should always read for what is real and not just what you want to interpret. Fake DR5 wouldn’t look for reality so he is a very poor reference. Like with all dr5 diagnosis you should always ask for a second opinion.
Here’s the articles concluding statement:
Conclusion
So there we have it - it takes on average between 154 (for QFM) to 201 (for QIH) total days to receive a 510(k) decision for SaMD products,
"You have simply pasted what a simpleton wants to see"
"Imagine a major disaster when bleeding re-occurs after the surgeon has already closed the outmost patient skin layer! "
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4300303-united-health-products-press-releases-cannot-be-taken-face-value
What a foolish scam this is fishing for suckers to lay their money down. What a joke to think the cheapest Chinese bandage money can buy will ever be used as a surgical bandage. Who could be possibly be insipid enough to believe this u-haul dealer in the desert headquartered company is producing a surgical bandage.
Trust, you don’t have to say someone told you I posted. You sound like a little schoolgirl. Man up. Let’s face it you love when I post. Deep down you know DR is a complete fraud.
Do you guys actually private message each other when I post? Creepy. Again, a bit schoolgirly.
Just take me off ignore and bask in reality for a little while.
trusttheman
Re: DR5 post# 7959
Thursday, 12/02/2021 7:48:35 AM
I actually wanted to hear what Wave had to say. The timeline he gave which so far has been accurate was completely opposite of what a few of us were told…..I wouldn't trust the FDA on any level. That being said, it would be interesting to see what he has to say. Also, why he suddenly came back. Maybe he feels conclusion will be coming soon.
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |