Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Canadian Natural Resources upgrader on hold
Wednesday, March 07, 2007
CALGARY — Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has decided to put its heavy-oil upgrader project on hold until federal and provincial environmental laws gain clarity and service costs cool down, the oilpatch heavyweight said Wednesday.
The company decided to shelve temporarily the long-term plan to build an upgrader in northeastern Alberta after preliminary studies indicated the legislative and cost risks were too high.
“It's the prudent thing to do,” chief executive officer Steve Laut said during a conference call.
”We don't know what kind of greenhouse gas regulations are coming at us, and as you go into second phase of [planning], you start scoping out the size of the vessels, and of the flow, and we're not going to waste money designing something that may not be effective.”
The federal government has not made clear its position on how it will proceed with efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions. And the government of Alberta, seat of the bulk of Canada's oil and gas industry, has also not put forth definite guidelines on emission control.
Canadian Natural Resources reported earlier an 18-per-cent drop in adjusted operating income for 2006, primarily due to sharply lower natural gas prices and high service costs.
Adjusted for the impacts of risk management, tax rate changes, foreign-exchange effects and stock-based compensation, the firm's 2006 earnings from operations declined to $1.66-billion, from $2.03-billion in 2005.
Fourth-quarter earnings fell 72 per cent to $313-million, or 58 cents per share, from $1.1-billion, or $2.06 per share the previous year, when the company made an $825-million risk management, or hedging, gain.
Adjusted quarterly operating profit slipped to $412-million from $470-million despite a 9-per-cent increase in production to 613,764 barrels of oil equivalent per day.
Revenue declined to $2.51-billion from $2.9-billion as CNQ's average fourth-quarter netback was down 27 per cent from a year earlier at $29.13 a barrel of oil equivalent amid natural gas prices barely half of year-ago levels.
At the Horizon oil sands project, 57 per cent complete at year-end, “our project management and construction teams continue to deliver,” Mr. Laut said earlier Wednesday, and “at present we continue to expect final phase one construction costs to not be materially different than our original $6.8-billion target cost with an on-schedule commissioning in the third quarter of 2008.”
Vice-chairman John Langille, added that “based upon current strip pricing and projected production levels, we would expect to generate 2007 cash flows in excess of $6 billion, above the high end of our original 2007 financial budget.”
Along with its financial results, CNQ announced a penny-per-share dividend increase to 8.5 cents quarterly.
CALGARY (CP) - Privately owned energy company Value Creation Inc. announced plans Wednesday for a $4-billion oilsands project in northeastern Alberta, using new upgrading technology that promises to slash operating costs.
The company's Terre de Grace project in the Athabasca region of Alberta will be developed in two 40,000 barrel a day phases, with first production coming onstream by the 2011, subject to regulatory approval.
It is the latest of a flood of oilsands projects eager to capitalize on growing demand for North American sources of crude, and modest compared to other massive, multi-billion dollar expansions.
"We don't have to compete with them because there's a market for our product, there's more demand than supply," David Tuer, a Value Creation advisory board member said.
Sitting on 290 sections of oil sands, the Terre de Grace block has 2.45 billion barrels to 2.77 billion barrels of exploitable bitumen in place. Value Creation plans on developing at least of third of its lease in eight phases.
Value Creation said the project will combine in situ recovery - heating heavy oil underground and pumping it to the surface - and the company's proprietary bitumen upgrading technologies to reduce costs.
The Heartland upgrader, being built by BA Energy Inc., a unit of Value Creation, will have an approved capacity of about 260,000 barrels a day. The first phase of the upgrader is planned for startup in 2008 and will refine 77,500 barrels of tar-like bitumen blend.
The upgrader will use the hot water from the produced bitumen, and the separated largest particles of the bitumen, asphaltenes, to fuel operations. Once the process has passed the start-up phase, the upgraded bitumen will be able to flow through pipelines without costly diluent.
"That obviously has quite a significant impact on operating cost, that and the fact that we will be displacing natural gas over time," Tuer said. "Those two factors will have quite an impact on operating costs."
In late 2005, Value Creation and Calgary-based energy giant Enbridge Inc. (TSX:ENB), which operates the major oil pipeline between Western Canada and eastern markets, announced a strategic alliance to pursue oilsands development.
As part of that deal, Enbridge invested $25 million for a minority equity stake in the company.
Canada US
My Portfolio
Gainers Losers Actives
Mutual Fund Lookup
Global giants may soon rule oilsands
Costs rise 55%: report
Jon Harding, Financial Post
Published: Wednesday, March 07, 2007
CALGARY - The trend of soaring capital costs in Alberta's oilsands will continue and could squeeze out smaller players, turning the industry into an exclusive club of fully integrated global giants, international energy consultancy Wood Mackenzie said yesterday.
In a report that was immediately criticized as off the mark by some of the sector's smaller players, the U.K.-based Wood Mackenzie said oilsands costs have risen 55% since 2005.
It warned that costs will continue their "upward journey" assuming companies press ahead with large-scale plans and drive the inflation that has gripped the sector for the past two years.
"The pace at which this enormous resource is developing could ultimately increase to a point where smaller companies are excluded and only fully integrated global companies are in a strong enough position to take on the costs and risks of developing these reserves," says the report, entitled The Cost of Playing in the Oil Sands.
The "hyper-inflation environment" in Alberta is largely due to labour shortages, increasing material costs and, to a lesser degree, skyrocketing prices to acquire oilsands leases, the average cost of which have increased 434% since 2004, the report says.
It does not mention the potential impact of Ottawa's green agenda, or government policy shifts that could wind up adding costs to oilsands developers' bottom lines.
One project cited that could feed the inflation and ultimately compel consolidation among smaller oilsands firms is Shell Canada Ltd.'s recently unveiled plan to forge ahead over the next dozen or so years toward boosting output at the Athabasca Oil Sands Project to 770,000 barrels a day through three expansion phases.
Wood Mackenzie said in the past 12 months alone, the capital costs required to reach an oilsands project's peak point of production rose 32% for a typical mining project and 26% for an in-situ, or thermal-recovery, project. Report author Conor Bint, a Canadian from Calgary and Wood Mackenzie's Edinburgh-based upstream research analyst, said among the 43 projects his firm is tracking, mining projects have an average break-even oil price of US$28.
He said the rates of return are more favourable for the less capital-intensive thermal projects, averaging about 22% with a break-even oil price of US$28 a barrel.
While those sound like reasonable returns, they actually pale next to conventional oil projects in Canada or elsewhere, Mr. Bint said in an interview.
The report says with oil at US$50 a barrel, all the commercial developments Wood Mackenzie modelled will be profitable with rates of return greater than 10%.
"Although still marginal, the projects have long resource lives and remain attractive investments," the report says, adding its estimates show Suncor Energy Inc.'s mining development has the lowest break-even price but also the lowest rate of return thanks to its small revenue in the early days of production when oil prices were much lower.
Scott Ranson, general manager of public affairs at Synenco Energy Inc., said there is no question costs are rising and that larger players have more options at their disposal to help manage the challenge.
jharding@nationalpost.com
Oh.
I just can't picture anybody digging for 30 years and being able to make it all tha same as it was before they started.
I don't think so.
The coal seams aren't hundred's of feet thick.
The reclamation around the Forestburg mine looks fairly normal
So there will be a big lake there?
I can't see Sherritt getting the go ahead to do that to that much land.
When they do reclaim it where are they going to get the dirt to make up for the coal rthat was taken out?
Maybe not in the investing mind but there is a lot of it burned everyday.
The Sherritt project is going to be a tough sell around here. Letters to the editor popping up already in the local rag.
So coal is back in the vouge?
Researcher Ben Anthony: Oilsands Gasification Will Help Unleash Energy Riches
By Mike Byfield
Ben Anthony is a connoisseur of Canadian coals, intimately familiar with their individual characteristics. "Every coal is unique. After a quarter century of research, I've become quite fond of them," the federal researcher acknowledges with a smile. He expresses less affection for coke and asphaltenes, the black gunk left over after bitumen is upgraded, but the stuff is abundant and cheaper than dirt. According to the British-educated chemist, Canada is on the brink of transforming its lower-grade hydrocarbons into useful energy on a very large scale thanks to projects now under way in Alberta's oilsands.
As a senior scientist at the CANMET Energy Technology Centre in Ottawa, Anthony specializes in gasification. This industrial process uses heat and pressure to draw synthetic gas - including hydrogen, the cleanest of all fuels - from low-value coal and upgrading residues. Compared to just burning the stuff directly, gasification can be energy efficient, and it's also relatively easy to capture waste byproducts like carbon dioxide and ash.
CANMET estimates that in excess of $4 billion dollars worth of gasification equipment will be installed in Alberta over the next five years. "We're entering a period of extraordinary development," Anthony comments. "Gasification of petroleum coke and asphaltenes is a highly significant energy development in itself. In addition, the operation of large gasifiers for the oilsands will probably enable us to develop economic technologies for coal gasification in the near future."
Among fossil fuels, coal is the motherlode. Proven world reserves are estimated at 1,000 billion tonnes, conveniently spread across more than 70 countries. Canada alone holds close to 10 billion tonnes, more energy than its conventional oil, natural gas and oilsands bitumen combined. So gasification of coal and bitumen waste holds out the tantalizing prospect of turning a supremely available resource into a cleaner, more useful form of energy.
Gasification was developed in the 1800s to provide fuel for energy and cooking. Petroleum and electricity later drove this manufactured gas from the market. When crude oil prices quadrupled during the 1970s, researchers renewed their interest in man-made synthetic gas (known as syngas) derived from coal and crude oil waste. Anthony, who earned his doctorate in flame chemistry from the University of Wales, gasified his first petroleum coke as long ago as 1980.
"We came very close to building a $200 million gasification facility at that time," the CANMET scientist recalls. The initiative died because natural gas prices plummeted through the 1980s and early '90s. In part due to pollution concerns, the United States Department of Energy launched its $4.8 billion "clean coal" program in 1986. The most efficient generating plants use combined cycle technology. (See illustration above.) Syngas derived from the coal drives high efficiency gas turbines. The exhaust heat from those turbines is tapped as steam, which in turn drives steam turbines. In the oilsands, the steam can also be injected underground for SAGD (steam-assisted gravity drainage) projects.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says 117 gasification plants are in operation around the world, with 35 more facilities under development. Of those 117, about 36% produce synfuels, 19% electricity, and 42% chemical feedstocks. Installed electricity generating capacity totals 24,000 megawatts, with an annual growth rate of about 10%.
"Gasification technology is dominated by global players with very deep pockets," Anthony explains. Among the leaders are GE Energy, with its Texaco Gasification Process, and the Royal Dutch/Shell Group. The first uses a coal slurry feeding system to supply the gasifier, the latter a dry pulverized coal. An especially eager player in this field is China, which is long on domestic coal reserves but drastically short of its own crude oil.
CANMET has constructed this country's most sophisticated gasification research and development facility, capable of handling both dry and slurry feedstock. Its goal is to help apply global technology cost-effectively to Canadian projects, with a particular emphasis on efficiently recapturing carbon dioxide. "Oilsands operators will be the first users of large-scale gasification with CO2 recovery," notes Anthony, who works on the Ottawa-based R&D team.
Besides operating costs, reliability is a key factor for power utilities. Anthony says gasifiers fed with coal have experienced downtime difficulties due to molten ash, and only a few have been constructed to date. In contrast, gasification facilities which transform refinery sludge and other crude oil waste into electricity and useful chemicals have achieved utility-calibre reliability standards in the range of 90-95%. Alberta's oilsands gasification plants will draw on petroleum coke and asphaltenes, a feedstock which will generate less ash than coal.
Five technology companies are aggressively promoting their gasification technologies to oilsands operators, according to Zeus Development Corporation. The Texas-based consulting firm estimates that oilsands projects will generate US$1-2 billion in licensing fees and other revenues for the technology winners. On the other hand, despite the inclusion of gasification in their engineering plans, oilsands players may not actually install those modules from the outset of their operations unless natural gas prices appear to justify the heavy capital expenses involved. (The illustration below outlines the gasification process.)
* Definitely committed to gasification from its first launch is the $4.6 billion Long Lake project, located 40 kilometres southeast of Fort McMurray. The SAGD operation is jointly owned by OPTI Canada Inc. and Calgary-headquartered Nexen Inc. Asphaltene feedstock from OPTI's patented upgrading process will be gasified to produce hydrogen for the upgrading process as well as fuel gases for steam generation and the upgrader. Synthetic oil production, expected to begin this year, is scheduled to reach 58,500 barrels per day in the first phase.
* North West Upgrading Inc., an independent company from Calgary, plans to construct a bitumen upgrader north of Edmonton near Redwater. The $2.4 billion first phase, with a capacity of 50,000 barrels per day, is scheduled to come on stream in 2010. Residual bottoms from its hydrocracker will be gasified into syngas and hydrogen.
* Peace River Oil Inc., an independent firm from Red Deer, has slated phase one completion for its Bluesky project in 2010. Asphaltenes will be converted into hydrogen, power, and steam, which should also push sulphur emission recovery above 99%.
* At its third upgrader near Fort McMurray, Suncor Energy Inc. of Calgary plans to draw hydrogen and fuel gas from petroleum coke. The gasification unit, a component within Suncor's Voyageur Two expansion, would substantially reduce the operation's need for natural gas. Voyageur Two is scheduled to come on stream in 2012.
* Synenco Canada Ltd. plans to construct its $3.6 billion Northern Lights upgrader north of Edmonton with a daily capacity of 100,000 barrels. The Calgary-based company has formed a partnership with Sinopec, China's largest oil refiner, to undertake the Northern Lights project, which includes a $4.4 billion mining operation located 100 kilometres northeast of Fort McMurray. Sinopec already runs four gasification units within its own operations.
Other oilsands companies may well opt to install gasification capability in future. Even more encouraging, Anthony enthuses, was an announcement last month by Sherritt International Corp. that it would like to build Canada's first coal-fed gasification plant. The Dodds-Roundhill project, budgeted at $1.5 billion, would process coal from a pit 80 kilometres southeast of Edmonton into syngas.
Sherritt, backed financially by the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, says the synthetic gas could be used as a petrochemical feedstock, or provide pure hydrogen, or simply be used as fuel. Also important could be carbon dioxide for use in enhanced oil recovery. A high operating reliability factor is less important for a fuel plant than for a generating station tied into the electrical grid as a baseload producer. The mining company won't decide whether to proceed with its proposed synfuel project until at least early summer after preliminary engineering has been completed.
While there is still a hefty "maybe" factor in many of Alberta's gasification plans, CANMET is confident that considerable investments will in fact be made. In part, that optimism stems from the growing federal commitment to contain emissions of greenhouse gases wherever economically feasible. "In terms of straight economics, gasification appears to have reached economic viability," Anthony comments. "And the more concerned people get about global warming, the more sense it makes to develop this technology."
New monster prowls oilsands
Remote-controlled 'ore eater' costs $150 million
Gordon Jaremko, CanWest News Service
Published: Tuesday, March 06, 2007
EDMONTON -- After 40 years of evolving some of the world's largest mining equipment, bigger is still better at the pioneer Alberta oilsands complex in Fort McMurray.
A new machine, devised by Suncor Energy Inc. for its next mega-expansion, eclipses the current industry icon, monster dump trucks weighing 700 tonnes when carrying 400-tonne loads.
Enter "mobile ore-preparation equipment." The engineers and manufacturers have not yet come up with a nickname or a brand.
"Ore eater" works as a descriptive phrase. The new giant is a mechanical grazer with jaws that crush lumps of ore frozen granite-hard by northern Alberta winters.
Its teeth stand up to sandpaper-like oilsands renowned for rapidly wearing away conventional steel.
Following field trials of a custom-built prototype, the new colossus emerged as a star of the planned, 230-square-kilometre Voyageur South bitumen mine unveiled by Suncor last week.
The same giant shovels that now load the huge dump trucks in four passes of their 100-tonne scoops will feed the new machine.
But the mobile ore eater will do double duty by crushing the ore as well as starting its transportation along the bitumen separation and synthetic oil production line.
The new machine swallows up to 5,500 tonnes of ore per hour, company spokesman Brad Bellows reported.
The ore eater chews raw oilsands to small bits and drops them onto a portable conveyor system. The belt goes to a "slurry facility" that blends the initial mine product, a mix of sandy oil and water.
Next comes another Alberta innovation, "hydro-transport" to the central bitumen processing plant via a pipeline which delivers the slurry with a churning action that begins the separation of the oil and sand.
A mobile ore eater costs about $150 million, but each one will replace 15 mammoth mine trucks, Bellows said.
Suncor plans to put five of the new machines to work within the next five years, at least partly replacing its current fleet of 60 ore trucks while also increasing production with its Voyageur mining and upgrader expansion projects.
A new 400-tonne dump truck fetches about $6 million.
Industry standard, five-year dealer service contracts cost almost as much again.
Keeping one of the big trucks operating around the clock, every day of the year, also requires five mine workers, Bellows estimated.
Current employment will not be cut at the Suncor complex by introduction of the new machines, but requirements for new staff will be reduced as the operation expands, the company predicts.
Instead of drivers, technicians in remote control rooms will run the new machines.
The mobile ore eaters will pay multiple dividends, Suncor predicted in a preliminary public disclosure document.
"We're always looking for technology to manage our environmental footprint and long-term costs," Bellows said.
The new machines will reduce mine traffic, safety hazards, engine emissions, fuel consumption and road building and maintenance.
Suncor is already looking ahead to growth even beyond Voyageur, which will double the company's oilsands production into the range of 500,000 to 550,000 barrels per day by 2011 or 2012.
The monster mobile ore eater is part of a package that will "form the foundation for potential future increases in synthetic crude oil production beyond 2012," the firm said in its preliminary disclosure document.
Scrap oil sands tax breaks, MPs' report urges
BILL CURRY
Saturday, March 03, 2007
OTTAWA — The Conservative government should scrap the generous tax breaks for the oil sands that some say are worth hundreds of millions annually, recommends a draft report by the Commons natural resources committee.
The report has been debated for weeks behind closed doors as MPs from the four parties in the House wrestled with the politically thorny issue of federal policy on Alberta's oil sands.
The document calls for an end to the accelerated capital-cost allowance program, brought in by the Liberals in the 1990s to encourage development in the oil sands, which, at the time, was seen by some as a high-risk and expensive way to produce oil.
The incentive allows companies to depreciate the full cost of equipment, such as the giant dump trucks and other machines needed to mine the oil sands, in the year it is purchased.
The Pembina Institute, an Alberta-based environmental group, has estimated that federal tax breaks for Canada's oil and gas industry are worth $1.4-billion a year. The institute has said the oil sands receive a significant share of those tax breaks but exact figures are impossible to find.
Environmentalists have long argued that the spike in oil prices since the allowance was introduced means there is no longer a need for such an incentive, particularly for an industry that is a large source of greenhouse-gas emissions and is a drain on Alberta's fresh water supplies. They have called for federal incentives to be redirected toward production of cleaner energy sources.
The report is complete and was scheduled for release yesterday, but that was pushed back by last-minute calls from the Conservatives and NDP MPs on the committee for a delay so that each party could write supplementary reports. The Conservatives are expected to disagree with some of the recommendations; the NDP is expected to say some do not go far enough.
The desire of Conservatives and New Democrats for a delay could be linked to the timing of the federal budget. With Parliament now on a two-week recess, the postponement means the report will be released after the March 19 budget.
In outlining its demands to the Conservatives for the budget and climate-change action, the NDP has said the $1.4-billion in oil and gas subsidies should be scrapped and redirected to new climate-change programs.
Environment Minister John Baird has questioned the value of the oil sands subsidies. However, Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn has defended the allowance. He has said it only defers the paying of tax and is not a $1.4-billion tax break as the NDP says.
Marlo Raynolds, executive director of the Pembina Institute, said he was pleased to hear of the coming recommendations. Canadians who have been observing the large profits of oil and gas companies in recent years would want any tax breaks to be dropped from the budget, he said.
“I think they would be very disappointed if it was not removed.”
Exploration Contract Ratified by Kurdistan Regional Government
/NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR DISSEMINATION IN THE
UNITED STATES/
CALGARY, March 2 /CNW/ - WesternZagros Limited ("WesternZagros"), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Oil Sands Inc. ("Western"), received
confirmation today that its Exploration and Production Sharing Agreement
("EPSA") has been ratified by the Kurdistan Regional Government ("KRG") and
confirmed by His Excellency Nerchivan Barzani, Prime Minister of Iraqi
Kurdistan. As part of the ratification process, WesternZagros has worked with
the KRG to finalize its EPSA area boundary and other key terms in line with
draft petroleum legislation. The final EPSA area encompasses 2,120 square
kilometers (approximately 524,000 acres) and holds a number of high potential
prospects.
Dr. Ashti Hawrami, the KRG's Minister for Natural Resources commented,
"We're delighted WesternZagros is moving forward with its exploration program.
WesternZagros is one of the most professional companies in the Kurdistan
region of Iraq and we welcome the investment and expertise they bring to the
region. The KRG is committed to providing a strong investment environment for
companies such as WesternZagros."
Kurdistan offers tremendous long-term growth potential and WesternZagros
is committed to working alongside the government and the people of the
Kurdistan region to ensure its goals are consistent with the aspirations of
the new democratic regime over the long-term. WesternZagros is encouraged by
recent developments with respect to the draft Federal Oil Law which has been
approved by the Iraqi cabinet for consideration by the Iraq Council of
Representatives.
About Western Oil Sands
Western Oil Sands Inc. is a Canadian corporation listed on the Toronto
Stock Exchange under the symbol WTO. Our vision is to create shareholder value
through the opportunity capture and development of large, world-class
hydrocarbon resources. Our primary asset is our 20 per cent undivided interest
in the Athabasca Oil Sands Project. Western is also pursuing initiatives
related to in-situ and technology development as well as downstream
opportunities. WesternZagros Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Western, is
pursuing conventional oil and gas exploration opportunities in the Federal
Region of Kurdistan in Northern Iraq. For additional information, visit
www.westernoilsands.com.
Source: Western Oil Sands
-------------------------
UTS's bitumen estimate at Fort Hills jumps 34%
2007-02-28 08:24 ET - News Release
Dr. William Roach reports
UTS REPORTS MORE THAN 34% INCREASE IN CONTINGENT BITUMEN RESOURCES AT FORT HILLS
UTS Energy Corp. has provided the results of the independent reserves evaluator's report for the Fort Hills oil sands project's contingent bitumen resources. In order to comply with National Instrument 51-101, the Fort Hills partnership (Petro-Canada, UTS and Teck Cominco Ltd.) retained independent reserves evaluators Sproule Associates Ltd. to prepare an audit of the Fort Hills partners' contingent (recoverable) bitumen volumes and methodology used in the recently updated mine plan. In addition to the report that was prepared for the Fort Hills partnership, a separate report was prepared for UTS in order for UTS to meet its annual securities reporting requirements. The report is effective Dec. 31, 2006.
The range of contingent bitumen resources associated with UTS's 30-per-cent working interest in the proposed Fort Hills oil sands project is summarized in the table below.
CONTINGENT BITUMEN RESOURCES
December, December, UTS's
2005(1) 2006 Change share (30%)
billion billion billion
barrels barrels barrels
Low estimate 2.4 3.1 28% 0.9
Best estimate 3.5 4.7 34% 1.4
High estimate 4.6 5.5 20% 1.7
(1) The December, 2005, figures are from a report prepared by GLJ Petroleum
Consultants Ltd.
EUB approves $7B project
Imperial gets oilsands OK
Lisa Schmidt
Calgary Herald
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Warning that the pace of oilsands development is posing critical environmental and infrastructure challenges, regulators still gave the go ahead to Imperial Oil Ltd.'s Kearl project Tuesday.
The decision is the third oilsands approval by regulators in less than four months and comes a day after the provincial government said it will shell out almost $400 million to Fort McMurray to deal with critical strains on Fort McMurray's health care, housing and drinking water sparked by the oilsands boom.
A joint review panel, established by the federal environment minister and the Alberta Energy and Utilities Review Board, granted conditional approval Tuesday to the $7-billion Kearl Oil Sands Project, to be located about 70 kilometres northwest of Fort McMurray.
The oilsands mine will produce 300,000 barrels a day by 2018 and will operate with a fly-in, fly-out workforce designed to reduce some of the pressure on the region's services.
"This decision is a significant milestone for our project and our company," said Randy Broiles, Imperial's vice-president of resources.
"Our next steps involve reviewing the decision-approved conditions and further advancing engineering work to define the project design, execution strategies and project cost estimate."
The decision follows three weeks of public hearings last November where municipal, aboriginal and environmental leaders argued for a slowdown in oilsands development to allow infrastructure and other services time to catch up in the region where more than $100 billion of oilsands projects are planned over the next decade.
It also comes on the heels of earlier approvals of Suncor Energy Inc.'s Voyageur and Albian Sands' Muskeg River, in which the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board also acknowledged growing strains of oilsands development in the region, but still gave the projects the green light.
"The Imperial project was the classic example of a business-as-usual project -- in no way did it stand out as seeking to address any of the environmental or social issues in an innovative way and yet, despite all of that, the rubber stamp has fallen once again," said Dan Woynillowicz, an analyst with the Pembina Institute, an Alberta-based environmental think-tank.
"That's a fundamental problem that Albertans have to tackle and is going have to be addressed politically."
Premier Ed Stelmach reiterated Monday that the government doesn't plan to slow the oilsands expansion, partly because of foreign investment. But regulators said federal and provincial governments must quickly take action to manage environmental and infrastructure issues if the pace of oilsands development is to continue.
"With each additional oilsands project, the growing demands and the absence of sustainable long-term solutions weigh more heavily in the determination of the public interest," the panel said in its report.
In a 126-page decision, the panel placed 17 conditions on Imperial Oil related to environmental and technical requirements for the project, including tailings and reclamation management.
It also contained eight recommendations to the federal government for environmental monitoring and raised concerns about the capacity of the Cumulative Environmental Management Association, charged with managing the long-term environmental impacts in the region, but "struggles to meet its deadlines."
The panel also made 20 recommendations to the province to continue to work with regional officials to address shortfalls in health care, housing and other services related to the rapid growth in the Fort McMurray region.
It also "believes that there would be merit in considering whether an appropriate share of the benefits generate by oilsands development could be directed to supporting the region on an ongoing basis."
The province has launched a review of oil and gas royalties, including oilsands, after soaring energy company profits sparked concerns over whether Albertans are receiving their fair share of resource revenues.
lschmidt@theherald.canwest.com
© The Calgary Herald 2007
Centre seeks greener oilsands (5:52 p.m.)
Gordon Jaremko
edmontonjournal.com
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Nearly a century after Edmonton scientist Karl Clark invented oilsands production, a business, academic and government team set out Tuesday to devise a cleaner replacement for his brainchild.
An environment-friendly industry, wasting less water and land, topped the agenda of the new Imperial Oil – Alberta Ingenuity Centre for Oil Sands Innovation at the University of Alberta.
Known as COSI for short, the science and engineering institute has about $30 million and orders to transform current bitumen production and processing methods into technology up to modern green standards.
“Its focus is critical for our industry,” Imperial resources division chief Randy Broiles told a U of A launching ceremony for the agency.
The event came a day after a long lineup of conservation groups appeared before Edmonton hearings by an environmental review panel on a northern pipeline. They were asking for a ban on the use of clean Arctic natural gas as a fuel for polluting oilsands plants.
Support for COSI includes $10 million from Imperial, $8 million from the Alberta Ingenuity Fund, $10 million from the Alberta Access to the Future Fund and about $2 million from federal science agencies.
“This will be high-risk research leading not to minor improvements to established technology but to real breakthroughs,” vowed centre director Murray Gray, a U of A engineering professor who has worked on oilsands methods since 1985.
COSI’s goals for the 175-billion-barrel bitumen industry include smaller mines, easier land reclamation, sharply reduced water consumption, curbed greenhouse-gas emissions, use of byproducts as raw material for manufacturers and new Alberta firms founded on the improved technology, Gray said.
Agency literature says the mission has begun with a “revolutionary discovery” in a field intended to replace Clark’s 1921 invention, a hot water process used in almost all of Alberta's current one million barrels a day of oilsands production.
The research breakthrough is a step in harnessing chemical solvents such as naphtha, a distilled petroleum product, to separate oil and sand.
The new technique will not be ready in time for use by the first 100,000-barrels-daily stage in Imperial's Kearl project, approved Tuesday, but could be adopted for further phases, Broiles said.
“The use of water is limiting the future potential of the industry,” Gray said. Plants using the Clark method consume two to three barrels of water for each barrel of oil production.
Other early work by the agency’s 50 professors, research staff and graduate students includes use of mineral additives to clean up and thin out bitumen while separating the molasses-like crude from sand.
The effort is led by Steve Kuznicki, a star industrial researcher recruited by the U of A from New Jersey, where he was chief scientist for an international chemicals and synthetic materials corporation.
Known as “molecular sieves,” the additives are inexpensive volcanic minerals and widely used in other fields such as water purification and replacing phosphates in soap, Kuznicki said in an interview.
The magic minerals have a useful atomic structure that resembles a screen door and gives them potential to strain contaminants such as sulphur and heavy metals out of bitumen. The work on oilsands uses is in “very experimental” but promising early stages, the scientist said.
“Around the world people are looking to Alberta for solutions,” Mayor Stephen Mandel said in reminding COSI’s well-attended launch that the cleaner the oilsands industry becomes, the more easily it will grow. “This is something all of us want to see.”
gjaremko@thejournal.canwest.com
Firm gets $30M for research, drilling
Bruce Johnstone, The Leader-Post
Published: Tuesday, February 27, 2007
The company that's working to develop the province's first oilsands project recently got a boost from a $30-million capital injection and more exploration success.
Oilsands Quest, the Calgary-based oil company that discovered oilsands deposits in northwest Saskatchewan near La Loche just over a year ago, said that of the 76 holes drilled from early November to mid-February, 58 holes encountered bitumen. That 76-per-cent success rate is "very exciting and encouraging, from our perspective," said Oilsands Quest president and CEO Chris Hopkins.
"We're continuing to maintain a high success rate. We're seeing good continuity of resources throughout the 32 sections," Hopkins said, referring the area around the original discovery at Axe Lake.
Hopkins added the company still hopes to drill 150 holes in total by the end of March, although extremely cold weather and tougher-than-expected drilling conditions have delayed drilling somewhat.
In fact, Hopkins said he's encouraged by the progress that's been made since the original discovery hole was drilled in January 2006. "Here it is February of 2007 -- just a year later -- and we've now ... made the internal decision to evaluate the commerciality of this resource. It's a pretty impressive performance.''
While no decision has yet been made to go into commercial production, Hopkins said the company has determined that the Axe Lake oilsands are suitable for in-situ recovery.
"When we say in situ, we're talking about production from 600 feet (183 metres), which is a good in-situ depth. It's not too shallow. And you're talking about methods that are less environmentally disturbing,'' Hopkins said.
While open-pit operations require considerable above-ground development and subsequent reclamation, in situ -- Latin for "in its original place'' -- requires less rehabilitation of the land.
Nevertheless, in-situ recovery -- which usually involves steam, solvents or a combination of both -- requires large tankage- and materials-handling facilities, he said. "They're pretty big facilities. They're pretty imposing on the horizon.''
Oilsands Quest needs to test several different technologies for in-situ recovery and, to that end, has engaged Saskatchewan Research Council, in particular, the Petroleum Technology Research Centre in Regina, to undertake laboratory simulation testing.
Of course, all of this costs money, which was the purpose behind a $30-million private placement by a syndicate of underwriters in exchange for 5.32 million Oilsands Quest shares that was announced last week.
The money will be used to fund the laboratory work and a proposed summer drilling program, for which Oilsands Quest will be seeking approval from the provincial government.
The flow-through share offering is not available to U.S. shareholders of Oilsands Quest, which is traded on the AMEX exchange. While the company is headquartered in Calgary and virtually all of its assets and employees are in Canada, the company (formerly known as CanWest Petroleum Corp.) is substantially owned by U.S. investors.
Hopkins said Oilsands Quest is currently seeking a listing on the TSX.
http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/news/business_agriculture/story.html?id=60f23f73-6ae3-42a8-82...
PBG interview on RobTV. Worth listening to.
http://www.robtv.com/servlet/HTMLTemplate/!robVideo/robtv0726.20070223.00048000-00048320-clip3/h/220...
Suncor Energy proposes Voyageur South oil sands project
2007-02-22 19:41 ET - News Release
Mr. Brad Bellows reports
SUNCOR INITIATES REGULATORY PROCESS TO EXPAND OIL SANDS MINING
Suncor Energy Inc. has initiated the regulatory approval and stakeholder consultation process on plans to develop an expanded oil sands mining operation when it filed a public disclosure document with government officials on Feb. 22, 2007.
The proposed project, to be called Voyageur South, would be located north of Fort McMurray on the west side of Highway 63 (about three kilometres southwest of Suncor's existing oil sands operation). Suncor plans to develop the mining operation using new technologies that are expected to improve operational performance while mitigating the impacts of development.
"Suncor is the pioneer of the oil sands industry, and that spirit of innovation and leadership is evident in the plans we have outlined today," said Rick George, Suncor's president and chief executive officer. "Investments in new technology are key to ensuring oil sands development provides economic benefits in a responsible manner."
Although several new technologies are proposed for the project, the most significant change planned by Suncor is the use of mobile ore preparation equipment, instead of a truck and shovel mining system. By using this new technology, Suncor expects to reduce noise pollution and air emissions, in particular nitrogen oxides. Compared with truck and shovel operations, the mining technology proposed by Suncor should require a smaller work force, which mitigates the social impact on the community. The smaller mining fleet is also expected to help Suncor better manage the costs of oil sands mining, from road maintenance to fuel expenditures.
Other technologies Suncor may use at the proposed development include new methods to advance tailings reclamation and reduce water inventories, as well as improved heat integration and extraction processes that could improve resource recovery while reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission intensity.
Commercial-scale testing of these technologies, including the new mining equipment, is currently under way at Suncor. The results of these assessments, along with information gathered through stakeholder consultation and extensive environmental and socio-economic impact studies, will be reflected in the final project plan submitted to regulators.
"We recognize the current pace of development in the oil sands region is exerting significant pressures on the community and environment, and we will work closely with stakeholders to address and minimize those impacts," said Mr. George. "Our work has only just begun, as we continue to refine these technologies with a goal of advancing the oil sands industry while minimizing the footprint of development."
Suncor expects to file an application to develop the project in mid-2007. Pending regulatory approval, Suncor plans to begin construction in 2009, with operations beginning in 2011. Suncor is targeting production of approximately 120,000 barrels of bitumen per day from the project, which is expected to have an operational life of approximately 40 years. Preliminary capital costs for the development will be submitted with the project application.
The bitumen produced at the proposed project, along with the bitumen feed from other Suncor mining and in situ operations and third party supply, is expected to provide feedstock flexibility for the company's upgrading facilities, which are planned to produce 500,000 to 550,000 barrels of crude oil per day in the 2010 to 2012 time frame. The increased bitumen supply is also expected to form the foundation for potential future increases in crude oil production beyond 2012.
"Suncor continues to pursue a path of responsible, staged growth. While we remain focused on our plans to increase oil sands production to the half-million-barrel-per-day mark, we're also taking steps to ensure continued growth beyond that milestone. Oil sands mining and in situ developments are aimed at ensuring our upgrading operations receive a steady bitumen supply to achieve those production goals," said Mr. George.
We seek Safe Harbor.
Western Oil Sands earns $63.37-million in 2006
2007-02-22 08:32 ET - News Release
Mr. Robert Puchniak reports
WESTERN OIL SANDS ANNOUNCES 2006 YEAR END RESULTS
Western Oil Sands Inc. has released its financial and operating results for the fourth quarter and the year ended Dec. 31, 2006.
Noteworthy operating and financial achievements during 2006 included:
* Fourth quarter production averaged 35,515 barrels per day net to Western, comparable with the record production of 35,600 barrels per day achieved in the fourth quarter of 2005.
* Annual production averaged 27,500 barrels per day net to Western, despite the two-month production interruption due to the full turnaround at the mine and upgrader in the second quarter.
* Near-record annual cash flow from operations of $228.4-million, with record quarterly cash flow from operations of $110.5-million in the third quarter.
* Capital expenditures totalled $301.3-million, which were financed primarily through cash flow from operations supplemented in part by a modest increase in Western's revolving credit facility.
* Proved and probable reserves increased 86 per cent from the prior year to 577 million barrels and a best estimate of contingent resources of 891 million barrels.
* The lands associated with Western's proved and probable reserves represent only about 11 per cent of the more than 69,000 net acres in which Western has the right to participate.
* The permit application for the Muskeg River mine expansion was approved in December, 2006.
Fourth quarter 2006
The completion of the first full turnaround at both the mine and the upgrader in the second quarter of 2006 set the stage for strong production in the latter half of 2006. Fourth quarter production averaged 35,500 barrels per day net to Western, representing the second consecutive quarter of significant production volumes. Production in the fourth quarter nearly eclipsed the record set in the third quarter of 2005, where production averaged 35,600 barrels per day net to Western.
During the fourth quarter, cash flow from operations of $91.1-million financed virtually all the capital expenditures during the quarter, however, lower underlying crude prices and wider heavy crude oil differentials contributed to lower overall price realizations. Crude oil averaged $60.21 (U.S.) per barrel, considerably lower than the average crude prices experienced in the prior three quarters. The crude oil heavy differential widened to approximately 35 per cent of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) compared with the prior two quarters, where observed differentials approximated 26 per cent to 28 per cent of West Texas Intermediate. As underlying crude oil prices decline, there is a corresponding decrease in Western's cash flow and profitability since Western's revenues are sensitive to fluctuations in crude oil prices.
A weakening of the United States/Canadian exchange rate, which results in more Canadian funds received on United States denominated crude sales, partially offset the negative impacts of the changes in crude oil prices and the heavy differential. The average exchange rate for the fourth quarter was 87.78 U.S. cents compared with 89.19 U.S. cents for the third quarter of 2006. Due to these factors, Western's sales price realizations totalled $55.08 per barrel in the fourth quarter compared with $67.42 per barrel for the third quarter. In the fourth quarter of 2006, operating costs were reduced to $20.12 per processed barrel compared with $22.38 per processed barrel in the third quarter. This reduction in per unit costs is largely the result of increased production in the fourth quarter compared with the previous quarter which provides greater economies of scale, partially offset by a 6-per-cent increase in underlying natural gas prices in the fourth quarter.
HIGHLIGHTS
Three months ended Year ended
Dec. 31, Dec. 31,
2006 2005 2006 2005
Operating data (bbl/d)
Bitumen production 35,515 35,572 27,500 31,994
Synthetic crude sales 45,594 47,751 37,326 42,534
Operating expense
per processed
barrel ($/bbl) 20.12 23.44 28.38 22.06
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND RETAINED EARNINGS
Year ended Dec. 31
(thousands of dollars)
2006 2005
Revenues 983,560 910,330
Less purchased feedstocks and transportation (353,522) (318,934)
----------- -----------
630,038 591,396
----------- -----------
Expenses
Royalties 4,064 4,005
Operating 286,325 250,389
Research and business development 34,863 10,657
General and administrative 28,456 14,491
Insurance 11,497 7,995
Interest 50,017 58,165
Accretion on asset retirement obligation 1,256 562
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 61,560 50,738
----------- -----------
478,038 397,002
----------- -----------
Earnings before other income
(expense) and income taxes 152,000 194,394
Other income (expense)
Foreign exchange gain 49 15,561
Risk management gain (loss) (72,118) 13,450
----------- -----------
Earnings before income taxes 79,931 223,405
Income tax expense 16,561 73,956
----------- -----------
Net earnings 63,370 149,449
----------- -----------
Retained earnings at beginning of year 161,181 11,732
----------- -----------
Retained earnings at end of year 224,551 161,181
=========== ===========
Net earnings per share
Basic 0.39 0.93
=========== ===========
Diluted 0.39 0.92
=========== ===========
We seek Safe Harbor.
Interesting article thanks to metacomet on SI
Oil industry finds hot rock resource
Major players in the oil sands, under political pressure to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, have quietly formed an industry-wide consortium to explore using heat in the Earth's crust as a clean alternative to natural gas.
The consortium, called GeoPower in the Oil Sands, or GeoPOS, plans to drill an appraisal well to assess the heat potential of granite rock that lies 500 metres below the Earth's surface. If the required heat levels are found, an "enhanced geothermal system" could be built that supplies the hot water needed for extracting oil from the tarry sands – a job typically performed through the burning of natural gas.
It could also deflate the nuclear industry's hope of building reactors in northern Alberta, an idea being pushed by the federal government and investigated by Husky Energy Inc. and France's Total SA.
"We are a member of the GeoPower consortium," confirmed Shell Canada Ltd. spokesperson Janet Annesley. "Geothermal fits with our principles of sustainable development, in that there's a potential economic benefit, which is reducing our operating costs and dependence on natural gas, and (it) reduces our greenhouse gas emissions."
Brad Bellows, a spokesperson for Suncor Energy Inc., said geothermal energy is "definitely" being looked at as a clean, long-term, and price-protected energy source for oil-sands production.
The oil sands account for nearly a third of Alberta's natural gas consumption, and the amount used is expected to jump four-fold over the next 10 years as development of the oil sands gathers momentum.
This dependence on natural gas has made the oil sands the fastest-growing source of greenhouse gas emissions in the country. Volatility of gas prices has also caused headaches for oil companies, which are exploring alternatives – including nuclear power – to give them greater price certainty.
Michal Moore, a senior fellow at the University of Calgary's Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy, said geothermal energy could be cost-competitive with nuclear power in about 15 years and would only require about $400 million in additional research and development.
Like nuclear and unlike solar or wind power, geothermal provides a constant, predictable source of energy in the form of heat – used directly or to generate electricity. Another benefit is that geothermal energy releases virtually no airborne pollutants and there are no waste-disposal and security concerns like with nuclear power.
It's also Kyoto-friendly. According to Natural Resources Canada, new geothermal facilities emit 0.1 kilograms of carbon per megawatt hour of generated electricity, compared with 185 kilograms of carbon for a coal-fired plant. They also outperform coal and nuclear plants in terms of reliability.
"If you think long term on this, the oil sands are a security issue for North America," said Moore, a former chief economist with the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory and past commissioner at the California Energy Commission.
"To the extent we can diminish the impact of accessing the oil sands, through advanced in situ techniques combined with cutting the reliance on natural gas, it gives Canada a tremendous competitive advantage in the future."
Moore spent the last 17 months as part of an 18-person expert panel, led by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, looking at the potential for tapping geothermal energy in the United States.
Specifically, the panel studied enhanced geothermal systems that can tap high temperatures up to five kilometres below the Earth's crust. The heat can be used on its own for district heating and oil-sands production, or turned into steam for electricity generation.
"On the whole, this is about as clean a power supply as you're going to get," Moore said.
Geothermal power generation is common in California, Hawaii, Nevada and volcanic countries such as Iceland, where the heat is closer to the surface and easier to tap. Western GeoPower Corp. is the only company developing geothermal power in Canada, at a site about 170 kilometres north of Vancouver.
Geothermal power is generated from heat of 80C to 200C, deep in the Earth's crust, and is not the same as ground-source heat pumps or "geo-exchange" systems, which use constant temperatures just a few metres below the Earth's surface to assist in heating and cooling buildings.
"It doesn't take much extrapolation to show that the deeper you go, no matter where you drill, you will encounter 250-degree temperatures," said Moore, adding that even Ontario could one day be replacing its nuclear plants with geothermal plants. "The power supply should exist just about any place, if you go deep enough."
The MIT-led report, released in January, concluded that there are no technical barriers or limitations to tapping enough heat in the Earth to generate 100,000 megawatts of power-generating capacity in the United States by 2050. Add Canada's geography to the mix and the figure would more than double – roughly equivalent to 200 large nuclear reactors.
Geothermal expert Susan Petty, founder of geopower consulting firm Black Mountain Technology of Seattle, sat on the MIT panel and said Canadian oil companies could easily apply their drilling expertise and geological engineering base to geothermal development in their own backyard.
She urged Ottawa to create its own expert panel that would build on the findings of the MIT group. Having already reached drilling depths exceeding 6,000 metres, where rock is hot enough to produce power, the oil industry is a natural fit for geothermal energy.
"The biggest problems we have right now are not drilling the wells," Petty said. "It's making the fractures (in the rock) that would allow you to extract (heat) energy."
Geothermal plants work by pumping cold water into a deep well and exposing it to the hot rock below. The water absorbs the heat and is pumped back to the surface, where the hot water or steam is used as required.
For this process to work, the rock has to be porous enough so water can flow through it and absorb as much of the heat as possible. If the rock is solid, cracks must be created by pumping water at high pressures and forcing fractures. Petty called technology advancements in this area "amazing."
"When I started on the panel, I thought it was only economic now to do conventional geothermal. But when I looked at how far they'd gotten and how much the technology improved, I was convinced in the end that we could make it economic.
"This isn't as complex as a nuclear plant," Petty added. "We know how to pump hot water, we know how to make holes in the ground, and we know how to use hot water to make electricity. We just need to do it better."
Moore, meanwhile, hopes to publish two papers on the issue in academic journals this fall, after which he'll present his conclusions to the federal and Alberta governments, oil companies and anyone else who will listen.
His thesis: There's plenty of heat three kilometres down and deeper to substitute the use of natural gas in the oil sands.
"Canada is rich in opportunities," Moore said. "All the deep drillers we had who testified and gave information to the panel suggest this is workable, but you won't know if it works until you try it."
Both Moore and Petty said the first couple of geothermal plants will be expensive – as were the first oil wells ever drilled – but the costs will fall as lessons are learned. Besides, they added, it's not as if nuclear plants, "clean coal" projects or other choices are any cheaper.
For example, Sherritt International Corp. and the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan recently outlined plans for a gasification facility southeast of Edmonton that would convert coal into synthetic gas for use in the oil sands. It will take at least five years to build at a projected cost of $1.5 billion.
Whatever the chosen approach, it has become increasingly clear to some in the oil sands that something must be done. Daniel Yang, a reservoir engineer with Shell Canada, told an audience last month at a geothermal conference in Potsdam, Germany, that planned multi-billion-dollar expansions of oil-sands projects must address the issue of rising gas consumption and carbon-dioxide emissions.
In an abstract of his presentation, Yang wrote that tapping the Earth's heat is an "ideal opportunity" because profitability of geothermal is "of secondary importance" in the face of rising environmental concerns. "Any level of heat supply is a success," he concluded.
http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/180278
Western Oil Sands' stock rises on reserves, possible sale
Friday, February 09, 2007
CALGARY — Shares in Western Oil Sands jumped up 6.8 per cent Friday, a day after the firm reported sharply higher reserves and said it's exploring a possible sale or merger.
The company, which has a 20 per cent stake in the Athabasca Oil Sands Project, reported late Thursday its proved and probable crude oil reserves increased year-over-year by 86 per cent to 577 million barrels, as of Dec. 31.
It also released, for the first time, its estimate of contingent resources at 891 million barrels.
Western said it is exploring alternatives “that will realize the full value of our assets and future growth potential. This may result in an acquisition or sale of assets, merger or other corporate transaction.”
Western Oil Sands and Chevron Canada each hold a 20 per cent interest in Shell's Athabasca project. Both have the option to join Shell's Jackpine and Pierre River developments.
Western's year-end reserves are based on an independent reserve evaluation by GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd.
The report indicates increases to Western's reserves resulting from the 2006 regulatory approval of the Muskeg River Mine Expansion Application, together with reserves associated with the sanctioning of Expansion 1 of the Athabasca Oil Sands Project.
On Nov. 29, Western issued a statement denying it had received a takeover bid.
Western's shares were up $1.97, or 6 per cent, to $34.02, on a volume of 2 million shares Friday in early-afternoon trading on the TSX.
Oil patch girds for battle with Ottawa
SHAWN McCARTHY AND BILL CURRY
Thursday, February 08, 2007
OTTAWA — Canadian oil executives have moved to defend their industry as “a major driver of the Canadian economy” amid growing fears in Calgary that the Conservative government is preparing to unveil tough, politically motivated environmental and tax policies.
In a letter obtained by The Globe and Mail, Kathleen Sendall, the chairwoman of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, takes issue with suggestions that the booming oil sands developments are unfairly subsidized and that the highly profitable industry can easily afford tax increases and new environmental regulations that would drive up costs.
Her letter was sent last week to Indian Affairs Minister Jim Prentice, an MP from Calgary who is Prime Minister Stephen Harper's point man in dealing with the oil industry on climate change strategy.
Mr. Prentice, Environment Minister John Baird and Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn are scheduled to meet with senior oil industry executives in Calgary on Friday for further consultations on the climate change policy.
But top of mind for the industry executives will be Ottawa's plans for the accelerated capital cost allowance, a controversial tax break that provides generous writeoffs for oil sands companies.
New Democratic Party Leader Jack Layton — whom Mr. Harper is courting to get his environmental legislation through a minority Parliament — has long campaigned against the tax break, calling it a subsidy for oil sands production that is a major contributor to Canada's greenhouse gas emissions.
Industry sources say executives are worried that the Conservatives may agree to eliminate the tax break as part of a deal to win Mr. Layton's co-operation.
So far, the oil industry has taken a low-key approach in its own defence.
The approach is in stark contrast to the public campaign it mounted against the former Liberal government's decision to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, which committed Canada to reducing emissions to 6 per cent below 1990 levels.
In her letter to Mr. Prentice, Ms. Sendall — a senior vice-president of Petro-Canada — said the oil industry paid out $27-billion to the federal and provincial government in 2006 and expects to invest $40-billion across the country this year.
She added that the accelerated capital cost allowance — which allows companies to depreciate the full cost of equipment in the year it is purchased — was extended to the oil sands projects by the Liberals in 1996 in recognition of high capital costs, long investment horizons and financing risks.
While crude prices have climbed, so too have costs, Ms. Sendall said, echoing the industry's argument that oil sands investment could dry up if both Alberta and the federal government impose new environmental regulations and raise taxes.
Companies now require prices of about $50 (U.S.) a barrel to earn a reasonable rate of return, she said. “The economics are just as challenging now” as they were in the era of lower oil prices, she said.
While Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has also indicated he will review the capital cost allowance, Mr. Lunn defended the provision Thursday, echoing the industry's own argument. “What they're doing is they're getting to write off their depreciations in the year they make their investments. So it's not a tax break,” he said.
Sources in the industry say that, until recently, oil executives were confident that they had an ally in Mr. Harper and that they would be able to maintain the generally favourable treatment that they had received from previous Liberal governments.
The Liberals were reluctant to impose tough greenhouse gas emission standards on the industry for fear of provoking a political backlash in Alberta. It was a fear that the oil industry, the provincial government and opposition Conservative MPs played on by raising the spectre of the hated national energy program of the 1980s.
Now, with Mr. Harper facing mounting political pressure for tough action on climate change, industry executives worry that the Conservatives can afford to impose some pain on the oil patch in order to win political support in Ontario and Quebec.
Still, environmentalists argue the government is unlikely to introduce tough new emission standards, but is more likely to follow the lead of the Alberta government, which is expected to impose modest targets that would gradually reduce emissions per barrel of oil produced but would not impose major new costs on oil sands producers.
Oilsands 'fever' cooling
Petro-Canada withdraws leases after offers come up short
Ashok Dutta
Calgary Herald
Wednesday, February 07, 2007
Petro-Canada has put plans for the sale of its stakes in five oilsands leases in northern Alberta on hold after bids submitted by a group of unidentified North American and global companies came in below expectations.
"These are high-quality oilsands assets," Neil Camarta, Petro-Canada's senior vice-president for oilsands, said Tuesday in a statement on the company website. "We put a high value on them, which was not met by the market. We would consider selling these properties in the future -- if the price is right."
In November, Petro-Canada issued bid documents for the sale of its stakes, ranging from 10 per cent to 36 per cent, in five in-situ acreages of Chard, Stony Mountain, Liege, Thornbury and Ipiatik.
Together, the company estimates the properties hold reserves of 1.7 billion barrels of bitumen
The announcement did not come as a surprise to industry-watchers -- even though they may indicate a cooling of the so-called "oilsands fever" that has engulfed northern Alberta's unconventional oil reserves for the last two years.
"They were non-operated assets and there was nothing obvious in terms of what is the real value of the assets," FirstEnergy Capital oilsands analyst, Mark Friesen, suggested.
Independent analysts have put the total value of the five leases at about $1.44 billion, a figure not disputed by
Petro-Canada.
"Since November, some issues have come into play. The price of oil has changed and so has the capital costs of developing oilsands projects. Our belief is it is primarily the need for prospective investors to apply caution that has gained precedence," Friesen said, by way of explaining the lower-than-expected response to Petro-Canada's sales offer.
In particular, the price of oil has been extremely volatile in recent weeks, falling to the $50 US per barrel mark before rebounding toward $60 this week.
Oil closed at $58.88 US on Tuesday on the NYMEX compared with $65.11 a year ago.
Petro-Canada is not the only company struggling to sell oilsands leases.
Talisman Energy announced last September that it was auctioning off all its oilsands leases in northern Alberta -- a sale expected to fetch more than $1 billion.
Talisman was able to sell its 1.25 per cent of oilsands giant Syncrude and its royalty on a lease held by Suncor Energy for a combined $583 million.
But offers have not been high enough for the company's two main holdings, including the wholly owned Lease 10 -- which spans 27.5 square kilometres just south of Suncor's Steepbank mine.
Talisman also has a 75 per cent stake in Lease 50, which covers more than 88 square kilometres just north of the new Long Lake oilsands project being developed by Nexen Inc. and Opti Canada Inc.
Spokesman Barry Nelson told The Canadian Press on Tuesday that Talisman had received numerous bids for the two large oilsands leases, "but they remain up for sale."
There are other signs the net asset value of oilsands leases is waning.
On Jan. 11, the province kicked off the new year by collecting $133.6 million from the sale of oilsands properties. In addition, it took another $54.24 million from the sale of sealed auction of conventional petroleum and natural gas rights.
Although substantial, the results still fell short of expectations. It was widely believed the properties would be worth more than $200 million. A total of 99 oilsands leases were offered for sale, fetching an average price of $667 per hectare compared with 2006's average of $1,300 per hectare.
In addition, there are signs that last year's international infatuation with the oilsands may be waning.
Britain's BP PLC, one of the world's leading energy companies, reaffirmed its plans of not to enter the Alberta oilsands industry in spite of questionable reserve issues.
"My priority is simple and clear," said Tony Hayward, the chief executive-designate. "It is to implement our strategy by focusing like a laser on safe and reliable operations."
Hayward, who is at present the head of BP's exploration and production, made these statements while stressing the need for the oil major to adopt a conservative approach.
"Once again, it reflects the caution that is being implemented by some of the oil majors. For the likes of BP, it is a question of where you deploy your cash and investment. In any case, BP has not been a investor in the oilsands sector, as yet," said Friesen.
However, Alberta's target of attracting investments for some $100 billion in various oilsands projects by 2015 received a major shot in the arm last week when the world's largest oil producer -- Saudi Aramco -- reaffirmed the importance of unconventional reserves going forward.
According to the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, Alberta's total reserves are 175 billion barrels, second only to Saudi Arabia's 267 billion barrels. At current production rates, the oilsands are projected to guarantee 190 years of supply.
"Access to a reliable supply of energy is essential to achieving greater prosperity and raising our standard of living," said Aramco president and CEO Abdullah Jumah, while stressing the need to derive energy from all available sources. "Technological advances would help augment today's
1.2 trillion barrels of conventional proven oil reserves by at least 1.5 trillion barrels of unconventional reserves in heavy oil and tarsands."
With files from The Canadian Press
© The Calgary Herald 2007
This is really wild stuff:
Green regime stuck in the Trudeau years
Claudia Cattaneo
Financial Post
Tuesday, February 06, 2007
There is a price to pay for economic development. You can't miss that in Alberta's oilsands, the largest oil project in the world, where growth is affecting the land, the water and the sky on a colossal scale.
Because of that, and now that "going green" is the path to political redemption, the oil deposits are drawing critics like fruit flies.
One of the loopiest so far is the federal Liberal party's natural resources critic, Ontario MP Mark Holland. In a couple of radio interviews last week, Mr. Holland made statements so absurd they must be nipped in the bud, before the governing Tories adopt them to one-up their political rivals on the green agenda, one of their tendencies lately.
Last Thursday, Mr. Holland told Charles Adler, a national syndicated radio talk-show host, that the Liberals were prepared to restrict oilsands growth to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions.
"I think what you are going to see is we're going to say you cannot exploit that resource, basically go in there and pump it out as fast as you can to give it to the Americans and sell out our national interests and blow apart our emissions targets," he said.
A day later, he told another radio talk-show host, Dave Rutherford, in response to a question about whether a Stephane Dion government would consider nationalizing oil companies if they didn't meet Kyoto Protocol standards, that, "If they refuse to work with us ? there will be consequences."
Nationalization? Growth controls? Cutting off oil exports to the Americans? Are the Liberals this stuck in the past?
Mr. Adler found the comments so stunning he described them in a column as "the most threatening words I have heard in a political conversation in years."
They are also tired and unimaginative. Canada has evolved since the days of Pierre Trudeau and the National Energy Program, when shutting down the oilpatch was the easiest route to political riches in Eastern Canada.
The oil-and-gas industry is no longer an Alberta island. It is dominating the economies of British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, and is poised to take over that of the Northwest Territories.
It keeps busy Ontario's steel mills, Quebec's engineers and Newfoundland's pipefitters. It accounts for a third of the Toronto Stock Exchange.
Putting limits on oilsands growth would maim Canada's economy, while broadcasting to the world -- now that the oilsands are widely known as the second-largest deposits after Saudi Arabia's -- that our energy sector is no longer open for business and that our federal government is competing with Hugo Chavez for the most insane oil policy.
It's easy for Ottawa politicians to paint the oilsands as environment enemy No. 1. They're far away in the bush. Restricting their growth shows them cracking the whip on the environment where it doesn't hurt -- such as forcing people into driving fuelefficient cars, building smaller houses or paying gasoline taxes for research.
It's also convenient to target oil companies. They're hardly in a position to fight back, considering they have an image problem due to their big profits and their opposition to Kyoto.
One wonders if Mr. Holland would be as keen to meet his Kyoto targets if it meant shutting down Ontario's auto industry or requiring people to car pool on Highway 401.
The oilsands industry is growing because we need the oil and the oil security, our customers' money and their markets.
Are the deposits an environmental problem? Absolutely. They use too much energy and water. They are forever changing a big part of Canada's wilderness. As for oil companies, they need to be prodded into doing the right thing.
But the answer to reducing greenhouse-gas emissions in the oilsands -- and other environmental impacts -- is technology and attainable environmental standards, not election-motivated controls on development.
ccattano@nationalpost.com
If Waugh has his finger on the pulse oil sands investors might want to start getting concerned about Canadian federal politics.
Tue, February 6, 2007
It's nowhere but up
Real estate red hot as residential sales in Edmonton jump 32% in one year
By NEIL WAUGH
The new year has started like the old one ended: "With a bang," if you are the ebullient Travis Holowach, co-president of ComFree Edmonton.
The more subdued Edmonton Real Estate Board (EREB) president Carolyn Pratt describes it as a "quick start."
But the hefty 32% up-tick in residential sales during January compared with the same month last year led Pratt to one happy conclusion: "The housing market in Edmonton has not yet crested."
This comes after what she described as a "blistering" 2006 when the average single family home and condo average selling price jumped 52%. The average housing price is already up 4.5% over December's closing at $357,325.
There's reason for joy in the EREB's 149 Street bunker, yet the upstart ComFree continues to eat into the board's very large slice of the residential real estate market pie.
Holowach said his January listings jumped 51% over last year, while 327 properties sold (compared to the EREB's 1,554 residential units).
Of course, Travis never forgets another turn on the torque wrench by noting homeowners "saved an average of $13,900 in real estate commissions."
While Pratt countered about the "need to get the best value of your home" by hiring a board realtor.
But Holowach probably put it best when he whooped, "Buckle up, Edmonton, this year is going to be another wild ride."
Unless Mark Holland gets his way.
The Toronto-area MP - who is also Liberal Leader Stephane Dion's natural resources critic - appeared on Charles Adler's open-line radio show last week.
He shared his - and apparently his leader's - views on what's on tap for Alberta's economic engine if his cynical party ever gets into power again.
Stephane and Mark have a big problem with oilsands expansion, where production is expected to increase "anywhere from four to five times" while at the same time "forgetting about meeting Kyoto targets."
'STABILIZE THE OILSANDS'
"We need to stabilize the oilsands," Holland blurted. "We would manage that resource responsibly."
Then the Liberals' oilpatch mouthpiece really got revved up by revealing what's coming down the political pipeline for Albertans and the dozy Stelmach Tories.
"We're going to say that you cannot exploit that resource," the eastern Grit blasted away. "You can't basically go in there and pump it out as fast as you can, to give it to the Americans and sell out our national interests," the rant continued.
Oh, so that's what Dion's new industrial revolution is really all about. Confiscation.
The rarely seen and seldom heard Edmonton-Leduc Conservative MP James Rajotte was riled enough to put out a press statement accusing the Liberals of going back to the "strong centralizing tendencies of the Trudeau era."
He reminded Dion and Holland that "Alberta is the engine driving the Canadian economy."
CLIMATE CHANGE
Meanwhile in London yesterday, a panel of Fraser Institute scientists released a report on the United Nations' scientists who put out their Kyoto Doomsday Report last week.
And found that actual climate change in many places "has been relatively small and within the range of known natural variability."
The Fraser report concluded "there is no compelling evidence that dangerous or unprecedented changes are underway."
Still it looks like Stephane Dion and NDP Leader Jack Layton want to take Alberta's economy on a wild ride. And not the kind Travis Holowach has in mind.
Connacher Oil and Gas Ltd (C-CLL) - News Release
Connacher Great Divide wells reach 650-metre depths
2007-02-02 18:04 ET - News Release
Shares issued 197,894,015
CLL Close 2007-02-02 C$ 3.67
Mr. Richard Gusella reports
CONNACHER OPERATING TEN RIGS; CONTINUED SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS AND FAVORABLE RESULTS AT ITS GREAT DIVIDE OIL SANDS PROJECT; FINAL CONSIDERATION BEING GIVEN TO SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION TO DEVELOP SECOND POD AT GREAT DIVIDE
Connacher Oil and Gas Ltd. is presently in the midst of the most active drilling program in the history of the company.
The company recently had 10 rigs working on its properties, including five core hole rigs and one surface hole rig on its exploration and delineation core hole drilling program at the company's Great Divide project. Additionally, one drilling rig is now drilling the fifth horizontal production well of the company's initial five SAGD well pairs from pad 102 at the Great Divide Pod One project. Also, three drilling rigs are being used to drill conventional natural gas prospects at Marten Creek and Simonette, Alberta. A second drilling rig, which will be used on pad 101 at the Great Divide Pod One project, is scheduled to arrive shortly and together with the Tri City No. 36 rig presently on location, will be used to drill the next 10 additional production and steam-injection SAGD horizontal well pairs. This will bring to 15 the total number of well pairs that will be available for steam injection and subsequently bitumen production targeted to reach 10,000 barrels per day, once the plant presently under construction is commissioned, start-up occurs in the summer of 2007 and bitumen begins to flow from the horizontal wells.
To date, the drilling of the horizontal production wells has proceeded extremely favourably, with no drilling complications. Connacher has been able to drill horizontal production wells to a measured length approaching 650 metres, approximately 150 metres longer than the original prognosis. This was done because the wells continued to penetrate consistently excellent bitumen-saturated reservoir, and accordingly, by extending the reach of the wellbore, more reservoir will be opened up for prospective production and recoveries once production is initiated. The company has also been successful in positioning the horizontal production wellbores in close proximity to the Paleozoic basement, thus minimizing the standoff from basement. This accordingly increases the amount of the reservoir above the production wells which can yield producible bitumen and should therefore increase recoverable reserves. Connacher also anticipates extending the horizontal length of the steam-injection horizontal wells as a consequence of the continuous high-quality reservoir encountered to date in the drilling of the horizontal production wells.
Significant progress is also being made in the construction of the plant and facilities at Great Divide Pod One. Readers are referred to the company's website; click on operations/great divide/photo gallery for up-to-date pictures of the advances being made in the construction program. Connacher has scheduled a field trip for invited analysts, institutional and other large shareholders, its bankers and various lenders who provided funds pursuant to the company's $195-million (U.S.) term loan B project financing in October, 2006. These funds, including a $15-million (U.S.) working capital facility for the company's Montana refining operation, are being used in the construction of the Pod One facility.
Elsewhere at Great Divide, the company is progressing very favourably with its core hole drilling program, which is focused on an extension to the east of Pod One and on Pod Two, Pod Four and Pod Five, as well as various other exploratory areas within Connacher's main lease block surrounding Pod One. Prior to year-end 2006, a total of six new core holes were completed; results of these wells will be incorporated into the company's year-end reserve determination for Great Divide. This information will be included in Connacher's report of year-end 2006 financial and operating results, scheduled for release on March 23, 2007.
During 2007, a total of 28 additional core holes have now been drilled with positive and in some cases very encouraging results. Several core holes have penetrated reservoir thicknesses up to 30 metres, which is thicker than that encountered at Pod One. In the opinion of Connacher's management, reservoir quality is considered encouraging and similar to that generally encountered in the region. All the cores and logs from the current program will be analyzed in detail and the results will be forwarded to the company's independent engineer for their assessment and usage in the preparation of a mid-year 2007 update of its estimate of bitumen reserves and resources. Seventy core holes have been planned for this year's program, leaving 36 to be drilled prior to break-up.
Connacher's extensive 68-square-kilometre 3-D program over the balance of its main lease block is also under way. The results of this program are expected to further assist the company in designing its 2008 core hole program, which will likely include approximately the same number of new core holes as are contemplated in this year's program.
Connacher also wishes to advise that it is in the final stages of concluding a decision to apply for commercial development of Pod Two at Great Divide. This determination is expected to occur shortly, following additional and continuous consultation with relevant regulatory agencies and authorities and final review and appraisal of available technical data. An application would also entail extensive consultation with all relevant stakeholders at the appropriate time. A near-term application and subsequent timely approval would enable Connacher to minimize the period between completion of current drilling and of the Pod One plant, and subsequent commencement of the development at Pod Two. This would be consistent with the company's strategy of repeatability and sustainability in the growth of its production base in the oil sands. Sequential planning and development are anticipated to assist in continuing cost control and compression of the time taken from pod discovery to production start-up.
Since the commencement of the winter drilling season in 2007, Connacher has also drilled 13 conventional wells at Simonette and at Marten Creek in Northern Alberta. Of the total wells drilled, six are indicated natural gas wells and two are suspended awaiting further evaluation, one is drilling and four were plugged and abandoned. A further five wells are anticipated in these areas before breakup and subject to weather conditions, the company will be conducting testing, completion and tie-in activity to enhance daily production and its conventional reserve base. As these areas are winter-only access regions, efforts must be focused on a quick turnaround from drilling to the production stage or otherwise these developments must await the next drilling season in December, 2007, or January, 2008.
Connacher is extremely pleased with developments at Great Divide and is satisfied with the results to date of its conventional exploratory drilling program. The progress at the Pod One plant is on schedule and the company is benefiting from its modular approach, which is helping to keep plant costs within budgetary limits and construction on schedule. Drilling results from the horizontal SAGD production wells are most encouraging and reinforce earlier interpretations from analysis of cores and logs. New core hole results are also positive and are serving to reinforce Connacher's continued enthusiasm for the long-term potential for production expansion from its landholdings in the area. Specific results at Pod Two would seem to support a near-term application for development, subject to final deliberations. New oil sands opportunities are also emerging, which if captured, would enable Connacher to capitalize on its experience and performance to date as it focuses on future growth and development.
We seek Safe Harbor.
Oil politics heating up
Will oilsands operators balk at royalty review findings?
By NEIL WAUGH, EDMONTON SUN
Premier Ed Stelmach was in Fort McMurray last week making a speech tailor-made for the place he calls "the engine that drives much of Alberta's and Canada's economies."
Stelmach said he could feel Fort Mackers' pain, and the "tremendous growth pressures" that the oilsands boom brings with it.
He specifically focused on labour force planning.
"I know that's a big issue in Fort McMurray," Stelmach said. "And one with no easy answers."
Then he revealed how he had turned his new Employment Minister Iris Evans loose to develop a "made-in-Alberta solution to labour needs."
To make sure that Auntie Iris got the message, he also included it as Point No. 1 in her mandate letter. She's ordered to "improve and strengthen" the province's immigration program and to implement a "comprehensive labour strategy."
Mainly because the one that Ralph Klein left him couldn't get much worse.
Allegations swirling around Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s Horizon project - and the imported Chinese tradesmen assembling the plant's massive tank farm - are bound to hit the floor of the legislature once the session gets going.
Yesterday, CNRL vice-president Real Doucet issued a "progress update" for the fourth massive project in the Athabasca oilsands.
He reported that construction was "ahead of our projected schedule" and the cost is still "not marginally different" from the original target of $6.8 billion.
Then Doucet praised CNRL's "well-defined and well thought out" execution strategy, including the "managed open site" concept that has caused a furor in the building trades.
It will likely see Stelmach's Tories lose two of their remaining three Edmonton seats in the next election.
"Fly-in/fly-out continues to demonstrate success," beamed Doucet. "We have expanded our available labour force to across Canada."
55 FLIGHTS A WEEK
He revealed that there are now up to 55 flights a week into the job from "all across Canada," with over 4,000 tradesmen and women onsite in December.
Meanwhile, there are disturbing reports of thousands of pipefitters and electricians on the dispatch lists at the Edmonton union halls as the bitter dispute between CNRL and the Alberta building trades continues to simmer.
Now Stelmach wants to import more offshore workers as his solution to the alleged labour woes, while Alberta tradesmen sit at home drawing pogey.
The premier also told his Fort Mac audience of his bold plan (except we haven't seen it yet) to review the ridiculous penny-on-the-dollar oilsands royalty to "encourage investment."
More importantly, the review will consider how to "pay optimal economic dividends to Albertans," who, Stelmach reminded the Fort Mac folk, "own these resources."
Yesterday, the oilsands patch began firing back, with the release of the Canadian Oil Sands Trust's fourth-quarter report. It contained the happy news that the income trust outfit - that owns a 36.7% stake in Syncrude - finally started paying a 25% royalty in the second quarter of 2006. Or $8.23 a barrel. In 2005 the average royalty was 72 cents a barrel.
And Syncrude is expected to pay $675 million in royalties in 2007.
But don't cry for Syncrude. Tucked away in the report's fine print is a revelation that the plant's break-even point is $23 a barrel. Yesterday oil traded at $57.30 US per barrel. Nice work if you can get it.
But finally Stelmach's royalty review plan has penetrated the Calgary oil towers.
ROYALTY REVIEW
The trust's document also warned unitholders that the company "cannot determine or speculate" on the royalty changes Premier Ed may have up his sleeve.
"The trust believes the current regime strikes the right balance between the owners of the resource and those risking capital to develop it," the report urged.
And it warned how oilsands plants are "capital intensive and risky."
Then the report called for a "fair and stable" fiscal regime that "recognizes the value of processing oilsands in the province."
Which should mean jobs and royalties.
Stelmach's going to hear a lot more anguish like this as the royalty review heats up. But can he stand the heat?
Cdn Natural reflects on advancements made in Q4
2007-02-01 08:01 ET - News Release
Mr. Real Doucet reports
CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED ANNOUNCES FOURTH QUARTER 2006 UPDATE ON THE PROGRESS OF THE HORIZON OIL SANDS PROJECT
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. is releasing its regular quarterly update on the Horizon oil sands project.
HORIZON PROJECT STATUS SUMMARY
Sept. 30, Dec. 31, March 31,
2006, 2006, 2007,
actual actual plan plan
Phase 1 -- Work progress (cumulative) 47% 57% 55% 65%
Phase 1 -- Construction capital
spending (cumulative) 48% 59% 58% 68%
Royalty race is on
Stelmach's Tories trail federal parties in bid to reap oilsands prize
By NEIL WAUGH, EDMONTON SUN
Nobody fired a gun or waved a green flag. But the race has started - there's clearly no doubt.
And Ed Stelmach's dozy New Alberta Tories are already bringing up the rear. Their dithering and indecision on the oilsands royalty review and value-added strategy has seen to that.
Meanwhile, federal Liberal Leader Stephane Dion and Prime Minister Stephen Harper - with his puppet master Jack Layton at his side - are already well up the track.
The prize is to reap the rewards of the Alberta oilsands. Which are huge.
The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers resident "sky is falling" expert, Pierre Alvarez, has already warned that $40 US-a-barrel is now at the break-even point for new oilsands projects.
With all parties in Ottawa now determined to green up Alberta's economic engine at the oil industry's expense, the fight for surplus energy company dollars is already on.
Yesterday, Dion released an old fund-raising letter from back in the Canadian Alliance days, which he insisted shows conclusively that the prime minister is a "climate change denier."
SECRET PLAN
Then his natural resources critic, Mark Holland, let slip exactly what the Liberals have in store for the energy patch if Albertans are unlucky enough to have the Ottawa Liberals lording it over us again.
Holland accused Harper of having a secret plan to "encourage rapid, unfettered growth in oilsands production." As though that's a sin. He said it's "just one more example of how he will ensure Canada will fail to meet its obligations to the world under Kyoto."
How the Libs plan to fetter (another word for hog tie) the oilsands, sadly, Holland didn't say.
But if the letter proves that Harper was skeptical about the worth of the Kyoto accord - which sneaky Jean Chretien signed without consulting Albertans - then will the real Stephen Harper please come back? Not the present impostor who must cut a deal with NDP leader Jack Layton to get his tax-cut budget passed.
In the 2002 letter - which the Liberals released as a 10th-generation photocopy version - Harper launched something called "the Battle of Kyoto."
It described Kyoto as a "job-killing, company-destroying" deal that's based on "tentative and contradictory scientific evidence."
Harper notes that the pact is based on harmless carbon dioxide emissions - not pollution - as the Libs' scare tactics would have us believe.
"Implementing Kyoto will cripple the oil and gas industry," Harper continued. "Which is essential to the economies of Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia."
Because the oil industry hit will "trickle through" to industries in other parts of the country, "THERE ARE NO CANADIAN WINNERS UNDER THE KYOTO ACCORD," Harper blasted.
Finally, a politician who tells it like it is.
'FAIR' RETURN
Except that Stephen Harper is no longer with us - replaced since before Christmas by the Prince of Appeasement who is trying to out-green the Liberals, or at least leave the impression he is.
Back to Alberta and the struggling Stelmach government. The premier campaigned in the PC leadership race to get a "fair" oilsands return for the owners of the resource. And to stop shipping raw bitumen (Stelmach compared it to "topsoil") down the pipeline to Illinois and Texas.
The race is on.
Canadian Oil Sands Trust (COS.UN : TSX : $30.34)
Q4 funds from operation slightly more than consensus
Canaccord Adams maintains "buy", 12-month target price is $33.00
CIBC World Markets downgrades to "sector underperform", 12-month target price is $27.50
Raymond James maintains "outperform", 6-12 month target price is $34.00
RBC Capital Markets maintains "underperform", 12-month target price is $27.00
TD Newcrest maintains "hold", 12-month target price is $30.00
Athabasca Alberta oil sand potential. Seems to me there isn't
much, but MENV for one is trying. Comments?
Cdn. Oil Sands earns $834-million in 2006; distribution
2007-01-29 18:57 ET - News Release
Mr. Marcel Coutu reports
CANADIAN OIL SANDS TRUST ANNOUNCES FINANCIAL AND OPERATING RESULTS FOR 2006 AND A DISTRIBUTION OF $0.30 PER UNIT
Canadian Oil Sands Trust's 2006 funds from operations increased to $1.1-billion, or $2.40 per trust unit, from $1.0-billion, or $2.19 per unit, recorded in 2005. A distribution of 30 cents per unit also was declared, payable on Feb. 28, 2007, to unitholders of record on Feb. 8, 2007.
"During the fourth quarter of 2006, our stage 3 project contributed to higher sales volumes and revenues, although the impact was mitigated by unplanned coker maintenance and a marked decline in our Syncrude sweet blend selling price," said Marcel Coutu, president and chief executive officer. "We expect 2007 production to rise as a result of our newly expanded facilities, which should help offset the weaker crude oil prices we are currently seeing. Together with a long-term constructive view of crude oil prices, my optimism for the Syncrude project is heightened by last year's signing of the management services agreement with Imperial Oil Resources. We now are already seeing the beginnings of this change with global secondees joining forces with Syncrude Canada Ltd. in Fort McMurray to set out a new path to enhanced performance."
Overview of fourth quarter and annual 2006 results
As of this fourth quarter 2006 report, Canadian Oil Sands will be reporting cash from operating activities, as it relates to the trust's consolidated statements of cash flows, as the trust's measure of its ability to generate cash from operations. Previously, Canadian Oil Sands reported funds from operations as such a measure, which did not include changes in non-cash working capital from operating activities and was not considered a Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) measure. Cash from operating activities provides similar information to funds from operations, better comparability with other reporting entities, and is in accordance with GAAP. After this report, the trust anticipates reporting only on cash from operating activities. All information has been adjusted to reflect the 5:1 unit split, which occurred May 3, 2006. Highlights include:
* Funds from operations per unit during the fourth quarter of 2006 were up 11 per cent to 63 cents, or a total of $296-million, compared with the same period of 2005. Including non-cash working capital changes from operating activities, cash from operating activities was $412-million, or 88 cents per unit, an increase of $131-million, or 27 cents per unit, from the same quarter of 2005.
* For the 2006 year, funds from operations increased to $1.1-billion, or $2.40 per unit, up from $1.0-billion, or $2.19 per unit, recorded in 2005. Cash from operating activities amounted to $1.1-billion, or $2.45 per unit, in 2006, compared with $900,000, or $2.07 per unit, in 2005.
* The increase in quarter-over-quarter and annual funds from operations and cash from operating activities primarily reflects higher revenues from the increase in sales volumes with the start-up of the stage 3 facilities. The trust's realized Syncrude sweet blend price after currency hedging gains averaged $63.71 per barrel in the fourth quarter of 2006, down 12 per cent from the same 2005 period. On an annual basis, the trust's realized Syncrude sweet blend price after hedging averaged $72.56 per barrel compared with $70.91 per barrel in 2005.
* Net income was $128-million, or 27 cents per unit, in the fourth quarter of 2006, down from $174-million, or 38 cents per unit, in the fourth quarter of 2005. Fourth quarter 2006 net income was reduced by much higher Crown royalties, higher operating expenses, and higher foreign exchange losses and future income tax expenses than were recorded in the same 2005 period. Net income before unrealized foreign exchange losses and future income tax expenses, which management believes is a better measure of operating performance, was $214-million, or 46 cents per unit, in the fourth quarter of 2006, compared with $192-million, or 42 cents per unit, in the same quarter of 2005.
* Annual net income in 2006 was $834-million, or $1.79 per unit, similar to the prior year's net income of $831-million, or $1.81 per unit. Net income in 2006 reflects higher revenues due to higher sales volumes and realized selling price, offset primarily by an increase in operating costs, Crown royalties, and depreciation, depletion, and accretion expense. Net income before unrealized foreign exchange gains and future income tax expenses increased to $851-million, or $1.83 per unit, from $796-million, or $1.73 per unit.
* Crown royalties increased to $83-million, or $8.23 per barrel, in the fourth quarter of 2006 from $5-million, or 72 cents per barrel, in the comparable 2005 quarter. Annual 2006 Crown royalties were $232-million, or $6.93 per barrel, and $19-million, or 71 cents per barrel, in 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Syncrude operation shifted to the higher royalty rate of 25 per cent of net revenues from the minimum 1 per cent of gross revenue in the second quarter of 2006.
* Sales volumes averaged 110,200 barrels per day during the fourth quarter of 2006 and 91,800 barrels per day during the year, compared with 78,300 barrels per day and 76,000 barrels per day in the 2005 respective periods. The 2006 fourth quarter reflects incremental production from stage 3, offset by unplanned maintenance on Coker 8-2. Production in the same 2005 period was affected by turnarounds of the vacuum distillation unit and a light gas oil hydrotreater, as well as replacement of catalyst in a heavy gas oil hydrotreater. Both 2006 and 2005 annual production reflect extended coker turnarounds and extensive maintenance in the first quarters. Sales volumes differ slightly from the trust's share of Syncrude's production volumes due to changes in inventory, which are primarily in-transit pipeline volumes.
* Per barrel operating costs in the fourth quarter of 2006 declined to $23.60, compared with $25.54 in the same period last year. The decline on a quarterly basis primarily reflects decreased purchased energy costs with the substantial decline in natural gas prices during the quarter offset by an increase in the value of Syncrude's incentive and retention compensation. Annual operating costs increased in 2006, averaging $27.07 per barrel, compared with $26.34 per barrel in 2005. Higher fixed production costs to support the new stage 3 facilities without the benefit of incremental production for much of the year combined with inflationary pressures in the Fort McMurray area contributed to higher year-over-year operating costs.
* Capital spending in the fourth quarter of 2006 decreased to $57-million from $177-million in the same period of 2005. Annually, capital spending decreased to $300-million in 2006 from $800-million in 2005. The significant decline is largely a result of the completion of stage 3 in 2006.
* Net debt was $1.3-billion and net debt-to-book capitalization was 25 per cent at Dec. 31, 2006 (prior to financing the trust's acquisition of Talisman Energy Inc.'s 1.25-per-cent indirect Syncrude interest, which closed on Jan. 2, 2007). At year-end 2005, net debt-to-book capitalization was 33 per cent.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(in millions of dollars)
Three months ended 12 months ended
Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Dec. 31,
2006 2005 2006 2005
Net income $ 128 $ 174 $ 834 $ 831
Per trust unit -- basic $ 0.27 $ 0.38 $ 1.79 $ 1.81
Per trust unit -- diluted $ 0.27 $ 0.37 $ 1.78 $ 1.80
Cash from operating activities $ 412 $ 281 $ 1,142 $ 949
Per trust unit $ 0.88 $ 0.61 $ 2.45 $ 2.07
Unitholder distributions $ 140 $ - $ 512 $ 184
Per trust unit $ 0.30 $ - $ 1.10 $ 0.40
Syncrude sweet blend sales
Volumes(*)
Total (mmbbl) 10.1 7.2 33.5 27.7
Daily average (bbl) 110,185 78,318 91,844 75,994
Per trust unit (bbl/trust unit) - - 0.1 -
Operating costs per barrel $ 23.60 $ 25.54 $ 27.07 $ 26.34
Net realized selling price per barrel
Realized selling price before hedging $ 63.47 $ 71.14 $ 71.96 $ 70.08
Currency hedging gains (losses) 0.24 0.93 0.60 0.83
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Net realized selling price $ 63.71 $ 72.07 $ 72.56 $ 70.91
========= ========= ========= =========
West Texas Intermediate
($U.S./bbl) $ 60.16 $ 60.05 $ 66.25 $ 56.70
(*) the trust's sales volumes may differ from its production volumes due to changes in
inventory, which are primarily in-transit pipeline volumes.
Syncrude operational performance
Figures provided are the gross Syncrude numbers and are not net to the trust.
Production may differ from that posted on Canadian Oil Sands Trust's website due to rounding.
Syncrude sweet blend production during the fourth quarter of 2006 totalled 27.8 million barrels, or approximately 302,700 barrels per day, compared with 20.8 million barrels, or approximately 226,000 barrels per day, in the fourth quarter of 2005. This increase reflects incremental production from the stage 3 expansion, offset primarily by the outage of Coker 8-2 in the fourth quarter of 2006. Largely as a result of this outage, Syncrude recorded a production rate of 255,000 barrels per day in December, compared with an anticipated exit rate of 315,000 barrels per day.
Bitumen feed to Coker 8-2 was pulled on Nov. 18 to repair a hole in an overhead line. While this work was completed in late November, efforts to restart the coker were unsuccessful, necessitating a complete outage of the unit to remove the internal coke deposit. This unscheduled maintenance occurred after a run length of 20 months against a planned run length of 30 months. Coker 8-2 returned to operation in mid-January, 2007. During the same quarter of 2005, production was primarily affected by planned turnarounds of the vacuum distillation unit and a light gas oil hydrotreater, as well as replacement of catalyst in a heavy gas oil hydrotreater.
Syncrude sweet blend production in 2006 totalled 94.3 million barrels, or approximately 258,000 barrels per day, compared with 2005 production of 78.1 million barrels, or approximately 214,000 barrels per day. The 21-per-cent increase in year-over-year production largely reflects incremental volumes from stage 3 operations beginning late in the third quarter of 2006. Both years were affected by extended coker turnarounds and maintenance on other operating units. Production in 2006 was further reduced by unplanned maintenance on Coker 8-2.
Syncrude continues to focus on ramping up to full annual productive capacity of 128 million barrels on a sustained and reliable basis. As the trust has indicated in the past, it anticipates this process will take time as Syncrude optimizes the new stage 3 operating units and that, during this period, production rates may fluctuate. In this context, Syncrude is currently investigating the potential factors for constrained production rates from the new Coker 8-3, which has been producing at only 70 per cent of its capacity for the past several weeks. Syncrude does not believe the constraint is design related as production averaged 348,000 barrels per day during the month of October and design rates have been exceeded for short periods of time since the coker began operating, rather, Syncrude expects to resolve the performance issues through the usual process of optimizing the operation of a new unit.
Syncrude employees and contractors recorded a lost-time injury (LTI) rate of 0.15 per 200,000 work force hours in 2006 compared with an annual rate for 2005 of 0.05 per 200,000 work force hours. The 2006 rate still reflects strong safety performance since Syncrude's 2005 LTI rate was its best on record.
Syncrude continued to make progress in its land reclamation efforts in 2006. For the third year in a row, Syncrude reclaimed more than 300 hectares of land. To date, Syncrude has reclaimed about 22 per cent of the disturbed land in the original base mine. As well, Syncrude planted over 500,000 tree seedlings in 2006, resulting in more than 4.5 million seedlings planted since 1978.
Syncrude reached the $1-billion milestone of business activity with aboriginal companies since it began tracking the annual figure in 1992. In 2006 alone, spending was an estimated $130-million based on 27 active contracts with local aboriginal businesses. As a strong proponent of aboriginal business development, Syncrude is the only business in Canada to have achieved gold level accreditation for the third time with the Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business. This national program recognizes companies committed to increasing aboriginal employment, assisting in business development, building individual capacity and enhancing community relations.
Syncrude signs management services agreement
Effective Nov. 1, 2006, Syncrude Canada entered into a comprehensive management services agreement with Imperial Oil Resources. Under the agreement, Imperial, with the support of ExxonMobil, will provide proprietary global best practices in several areas including:
* maintenance and reliability;
* energy management;
* procurement;
* safety;
* ]health; and
* environmental performance.
Importantly, the agreement also supports Syncrude's growth plans by engaging the joint venture owners to pursue the scope design of the currently proposed stage 3 debottleneck and stage 4 expansions. Syncrude owners believe this agreement can deliver further sustainable improvement in Syncrude's operating performance and leverage Syncrude's growth opportunities.
The agreement has an initial term of 10 years with five-year renewal provisions, and either Syncrude Canada or Imperial has the option to cancel the agreement on 24 months notice for any reason. In order to compensate Imperial for its expanded commitment, Syncrude Canada will pay annual fixed service fees of $47-million (about $17-million net to Canadian Oil Sands based on its 36.74-per-cent share) during the first 10 years and reimburse Imperial for any direct costs they incur in providing the services. For the following 10 years, the annual fixed service fees drop to $33-million (approximately $12-million net to the trust). As well, performance fee incentives also will apply after the first three years of the agreement if certain targets are achieved.
An opportunity assessment team (OAT) comprise experts from Syncrude, Imperial, ExxonMobil and some of the other owner companies has been formed, and is currently conducting a comprehensive on-site assessment of the Syncrude operations. The mandate of this team is to better understand the opportunities and define best approaches for implementation, including prioritization of the opportunities to pursue. In about three months, the OAT will make specific recommendations to the Syncrude owners. If the recommendations that are approved by the Syncrude owners are not to the reasonable satisfaction of Imperial, then Imperial can terminate the management services agreement.
The implementation phase is expected to involve the secondment of Imperial, ExxonMobil and potentially other owner companies' personnel to Syncrude. These secondees will work closely with Syncrude management and staff to assist in the implementation of the OAT's recommendations and Imperial/ExxonMobil's proven global best practices and systems.
Canadian Oil Sands acquires an additional 1.25-per-cent working interest in Syncrude
On Jan. 2, 2007, the trust's wholly owned subsidiary, Canadian Oil Sands Ltd., closed its previously announced acquisition from Talisman Energy Inc. of an additional 1.25-per-cent indirect working interest in the Syncrude joint venture. The transaction price agreed to on Nov. 29, 2006, was for approximately $475-million, comprising $237.5-million in cash and 8,189,655 Canadian Oil Sands trust units. The transaction increased Canadian Oil Sands' ownership in Syncrude to 36.74 per cent, was modestly accretive to reserves and production per unit and enabled the trust to simplify its administrative structure.
Executive management change
As previously announced, the following executive management change is effective April 25, 2007. Allen Hagerman, FCA, has decided to transition from his full-time position as chief financial officer of the trust's wholly owned subsidiary, Canadian Oil Sands Ltd., to a part-time role as executive vice-president. In this new role, Mr. Hagerman will be responsible for various projects and specific Syncrude related matters, such as oversight of the Syncrude business controls project. Concurrent with this move, Ryan Kubik will be promoted to chief financial officer of Canadian Oil Sands. Mr. Kubik joined Canadian Oil Sands as treasurer in September, 2002. He has more than 15 years of corporate finance experience, holding progressively senior finance positions with EnCana Corp., PanCanadian Energy and PricewaterhouseCoopers prior to joining Canadian Oil Sands. Mr. Kubik holds chartered accountant and chartered financial analyst designations, and a bachelor of commerce degree from the University of Calgary.
Foreign ownership at 36 per cent
Based on information from the statutory declarations by unitholders, the trust estimates that, as of Nov. 3, 2006, approximately 36 per cent of the trust's unitholders are non-Canadian residents. Canadian Oil Sands' trust indenture provides that not more than 49 per cent of its units can be held by non-Canadian residents.
The trust continues to monitor its foreign ownership levels on a regular basis through declarations from unitholders. The next declarations will be as of Feb. 8, 2007, and the results will be posted on the trust's website under investor information, frequently asked questions. This section of the website and page 45 of the management's discussion and analysis section of the trust's 2005 annual report describe the trust's steps for managing its non-Canadian resident ownership levels.
Financial plan revised in response to proposed income trust tax changes
On Oct. 31, 2006, the minister of finance announced the federal government's intention to impose a new tax on certain distributions from existing income and royalty trusts effective in 2011. A stated goal was to equalize the tax burden between income trusts and corporations after a transition period. On Dec. 21, 2006, draft legislation was released for comment. Assuming the proposed changes are enacted, it is expected that, after the transition period in 2011, the new tax will apply to Canadian Oil Sands' distributions and will ultimately have a material adverse effect on the cash available for distributions to unitholders. Under the proposed rules, distributions of non-portfolio earnings (as defined in the draft legislation) of the trust would not be deductible to the trust and would be taxable at the rate of 31.5 per cent, thus reducing the distributions paid. Currently almost all of Canadian Oil Sands' unitholder distributions comprise non-portfolio earnings. Distributions of non-portfolio earnings would be considered dividends under the new rules and eligible for the dividend tax credit, similar to the tax treatment on corporate dividends. As such, the after-tax effect would be relatively neutral to Canadian investors who hold our units in taxable accounts. Investors who hold the trust's units in tax deferred accounts and non-resident unitholders would see their after-tax realizations decline significantly. The effect of the federal government's announcement resulted in a substantial decline in the market value of trust units generally.
While the proposed changes, if enacted, will negatively affect the after-tax realizations of some unitholders, the trustamental business of Canadian Oil Sands remains unchanged. The trust does not rely on the trust structure and issuance of equity to sustain its business. The trust has long-life reserves of approximately 40 years at stage 3 productive capacity rates with virtually no decline in production. As well, it has approximately $2-billion of tax pools available to defer taxable income in future years. The trust has its net-debt target to $1.6-billion, up from $1.2-billion, to accelerate fuller payout of free cash flow and allow the trust to maximize distributions and conserve tax deductions until the proposed tax changes take effect in 2011.
The new rules are not expected to significantly limit the trust's near-term growth opportunities. The proposed changes permit normal growth throughout the transition period by allowing cumulative increases of equity capital of 40 per cent in 2007 and 20 per cent in each of the subsequent three years for a doubling of equity capital between now and 2010. Equity capital growth in excess of these limits may be deemed undue expansion and may subject the trust's distributions to the proposed tax changes prior to the end of the transition period.
In the absence of final legislation implementing the 2006 proposed changes, the implications are difficult to fully evaluate and no assurance can be provided as to the extent and timing of their application to Canadian Oil Sands and the trust's unitholders. Management will evaluate Canadian Oil Sands' alternatives to most effectively optimize value for the trust's unitholders.
Canadian Oil Sands encourages unitholders to join CAITI
Canadian Oil Sands is continuing to express its concerns and objections to the federal government regarding the proposed income trust tax changes in order to realize a better solution than what is currently being proposed. An organization called the Canadian Association of Income Trust Investors (CAITI) has been formed with a mission to preserve the continuing viability and sustainability of the Canadian income trust market. Its immediate goal is to ensure that the proposed draft legislative proposals of Dec. 21, 2006, known as the tax fairness plan, are not voted into law. CAITI is an effective vehicle through which retail investors can voice their opinions regarding trust taxation. The trust is encouraging Canadians to support the efforts of this organization by becoming members of CAITI. Signing up for membership is a simple process accomplished through CAITI's website, which also contains comprehensive information on income trusts and the proposed tax changes.
Distribution reinvestment plan (DRIP)
As previously disclosed, Canadian Oil Sands Trust suspended its DRIP. The trust no longer requires the equity financing from the DRIP following the completion of the stage 3 project. The trust may reinstate the DRIP in the future if required to finance new investing activities. The distribution announced today and payable on Feb. 28, 2007, will not allow DRIP participation.
Review of Alberta oil sands royalty
The Alberta government has announced that it is reviewing Alberta's oil sands royalty regime to determine if the current regime applies the most appropriate royalty rate to oil sands' revenues. Canadian Oil Sands cannot determine or speculate as to the potential effect of any changes to the royalty rate on its operations until the government provides information on the findings of its review. The Syncrude operation shifted to the higher royalty rate of 25 per cent of net revenues from the minimum 1 per cent of gross revenue in the second quarter of 2006.
Alberta's current oil sands royalty regime was instituted in 1997 and calculates royalties as 1 per cent of gross revenue until a project reaches payout, after which point the rate rises to 25 per cent of revenue less operating and capital costs. The rates are tied to crude oil prices, such that higher prices accelerate recovery of costs and payout, after which, the higher rate is a cash sharing formula of a project's profitability.
The trust believes the current regime strikes the right balance between the owners of the resource -- the people of Alberta -- and those risking capital to develop it. The trust hopes that any review of oil sands royalty rates would seek to maintain a fair and stable fiscal regime that also recognizes the value of processing oil sands in the province. The success of Alberta's oil sands is largely due to this historically stable and predictable fiscal regime that has been in place since 1997, which has encouraged investment by recognizing the unique challenges of the oil sands business. Oil sands projects are capital intensive and risky, requiring billions of dollars of upfront investment and very long lead times before they are capable of generating revenue and eventually a profit. Once these projects have recovered their costs, however, the regime provides Albertans with the opportunity to participate with a 25-per-cent share in the industry's profits.
The Syncrude project is already providing this higher return to Albertans. Robust crude oil prices increased revenues from the base plant and accelerated the payout period of the new stage 3 expansion; as a result the Syncrude project began paying the higher royalty rate at roughly the same time as the expansion was completed. Based on Canadian Oil Sands' assumptions in its Jan. 29, 2007, guidance document in Stockwatch, Syncrude is expected to pay Crown royalties of $675-million in 2007.
2007 outlook
The following provides Canadian Oil Sands' outlook for 2007 as of Jan. 29, 2007, and is subject to change without notice. It reflects the trust's 36.74-per-cent interest in Syncrude.
The outlook reflects a 36.74-per-cent interest in Syncrude following the close of the acquisition of Talisman Energy Inc.'s indirect 1.25-per-cent Syncrude interest on Jan. 2, 2007, and includes:
* Syncrude production is estimated to range between 105 million to 120 million barrels, or 39 million to 44 million barrels net to the trust. The single point estimate is 110 million barrels, or 40.4 million barrels net to the trust, which includes one planned coker turnaround scheduled for the third quarter of 2007. The low end of the range reflects the possibility of an additional unscheduled coker turnaround while the upper end reflects higher than budgeted operational reliability and stability;
* operating costs are estimated to be $25.83 per barrel with purchased energy costs accounting for $7.08 per barrel of this amount. The trust is assuming an average AECO natural gas price of $7.50 per gigajoule for 2007;
* cash from operating activities is expected to total $857-million, or $1.79 per unit, based on an average WTI crude oil price of $55 (U.S.) per barrel and a foreign exchange rate of 88 U.S. cents:$1 (Canadian) during 2007. Cash from operating activities includes a projected $25-million increase in operating working capital requirements;
* free cash flow is expected to be $1.25 per unit. Free cash flow is defined as cash from operating activities less capital expenditures and reclamation trust contributions;
* annual Crown royalties are expected to be $6.14 per barrel, or $248-million, reflecting the 25-per-cent royalty rate;
* capital expenditures are expected to total $255-million with approximately 57 per cent directed to maintenance of operations, 33 per cent directed to the Syncrude emissions reduction project and 10 per cent to stage 3 completion and modification costs. The Syncrude emissions reduction project is a multiyear special project expected to total approximately $772-million, gross to Syncrude. Combined with the sulphur reduction technology in the completed stage 3 expansion, the project is designed to reduce total sulphur dioxide emissions by 60 per cent from today's approved levels by 2011;
* the trust estimates that over 95 per cent of the distributions pertaining to 2007 will be taxable as other income. The actual taxability of the distributions will be determined and reported to unitholders prior to the end of the first quarter of 2008; and
* the trust's crude oil production remains unhedged, and under the current financing plan, it does not intend to undertake any crude oil hedging transactions. The trust may hedge its crude oil production in the future depending on the business environment and the trust's growth opportunities.
We seek Safe Harbor.
Good stuff, if the Emperor wore no clothes he would be writing the Emperor is naked alright.
Waugh is really on a roll these days:
Heat's on Ed
Oil company suits don't like what they're hearing from new premier
By NEIL WAUGH, EDMONTON SUN
They gave Ed Stelmach a standing O when he entered the Lions' Den to give his first official premier's speech in Calgary yesterday.
And one of those cheesy white hats.
It was reportedly a very cordial meeting.
But then again, he didn't tell the Calgary Chamber of Commerce what they had to be told, that is, how the New Alberta is going to work - now that there's no longer a Cowtown premier for them to push around.
Instead, he asked the oil company suits to stay tuned until after the cabinet planning session next week when a "clear business agenda" will come out.
"Obviously you will be seeing a new and different style of premier," Stelmach said.
At least, here's hoping.
But already hard at work are those who would knock Stelmach off the puck and dilute the agenda.
They are trying to talk Ed and his rural rowdy bunch out of what clearly needs to be done: win back control of oil, gas and oilsands development. And bring in a reasonable royalty regime that returns a fair share of economic rent to Albertans in times of robust energy prices.
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers president Pierre Alvarez countered darkly about how investors are "looking very carefully at what the province's plans are," implying there's a flight of capital about to take off.
To where, Venezuela?
Or, how "people do need to realize the system, from our point of view, has worked."
At a penny-on-the-dollar royalty and no restrictions on raw bitumen removal, how couldn't it?
Stelmach said there's going to be a Land Use Framework that balances the "economic, environmental and recreational needs" of Albertans. Plus a "comprehensive energy strategy," which hopefully means if you mine it here you upgrade and refine it here. And no more crazy talk about building oilsands plants in Asia and barging the modules up the Mackenzie River. Although Ed never actually said that.
He also promised an "open and transparent" royalty review, which has to include the goofy oilsands giveaway designed when oil was under $20 US a barrel.
Then Stelmach sketched in where he's coming from.
"By balanced, I mean what's fair to both industry - which is making tremendous investments in a volatile marketplace - and to Albertans, who own the resources," Stelmach's speech text stressed.
Before the big energy outfits turn loose their political bird dogs to start working the MLAs, there's also going to be a lobbyist and contractor registry.
That's when Big Oil's guy played the price card.
"We are very concerned about where the markets are right now," Alvarez sighed.
"People need to remember that this is a commodity business, we've had a great run-up but there there are also downs."
That's if you call $50 US a barrel a down.
"We want to make sure, as we move forward, some of the factors from an industry point of view are considered as much from the public point of view."
It's clear the heat from Calgary is already on Ed.
The temporary slump in oil prices is going to be portrayed as the worst thing to hit Alberta since the Great Depression.
On Feb. 1 Finance Minister Lyle Oberg is scheduled to roll out his royalty review.
It will be Ed Stelmach's first big test.
Yes I am going to keep my eyes open for a nice winter villa that I can escape to
from the industrial hell hole my native land is becoming.
Spoken like a true imperialistic capitalist who is soon on his way for a voyeuristic tour of the colonies.
Who cares, we're gonna be rich!!!!
Then we can live wherever we want.
Ottawa hails nuclear energy for oilsands
Jason Fekete and Mike de Souza
Calgary Herald and CanWest News Service
Thursday, January 18, 2007
Ottawa set its sights on the oilpatch Wednesday, as one minister said he's "very keen" on using nuclear power in the oilsands while another questioned the wisdom of retaining tax incentives to develop Alberta's massive bitumen deposits.
Energy experts quickly questioned the federal government's ringing endorsement of using nuclear power for the oilpatch, arguing there are better alternatives for slashing greenhouse gas emissions.
Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn told reporters Wednesday in Ottawa that nuclear power is an option worth pursuing as petroleum producers look to decrease reliance on natural gas and slash greenhouse gas emissions from oilsands operations.
"As we see the potential increase in (oilsands) production, moving from a million barrels a day up to four or five (million), we need to do better. I think there's great promise in the oilsands for nuclear energy," Lunn said.
"There's a great opportunity to pursue nuclear energy -- something that I'm very keen on."
Whereas oil companies burn vast amounts of natural gas to extract the molasses-like bitumen from the oilsands, nuclear energy is emission-free and doesn't spew greenhouse gases, Lunn argued.
Lunn's comments came as he announced $230 million in federal funds will be invested over four years into research on clean energy, which could look at such options as clean-coal technology, carbon capture and storage, and "next-generation nuclear."
Details of where the new investments will go won't be released until this spring. The announcement was the first of three new climate change initiatives to be unveiled this week, replacing billions in energy programs scrapped or frozen when the Conservatives took office.
While nuclear power was hailed by Lunn, experts are skeptical about its future in the oilsands.
David Keith, Canada research chair in energy and the environment at the University of Calgary, said nuclear is "really not a very good fit" for the oilsands.
Rather, carbon dioxide capture and storage is the most likely technology to be used in Alberta to curb emissions, he said.
"If we want to do sensible policy instead of just get driven by sound-bite foolishness, we need to back off on forcing the oilsands companies to do this," Keith said, "and instead push where it's more cost-effective on the electric utilities."
Alberta would be better suited eyeing nuclear energy as an option for replacing coal-fired electricity plants if the aim is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, he said.
Premier Ed Stelmach predicted this week the nuclear power debate will only heat up in coming months and years.
Meanwhile, federal Environment Minister John Baird -- who joined Lunn for the research announcement -- seemed to question tax incentives introduced in the 1990s to boost oilsands output.
Baird said he couldn't understand why Liberal Leader Stephane Dion was part of a government that introduced the incentives, and was puzzled by the federal assistance in the booming sector.
"I cannot explain why the Liberal government of Mr. Dion made these changes," Baird said, speaking in French. "I'm not here to defend the policies of Stephane Dion and the Liberal party. It was his cabinet with Stephane Dion that created this program. (Finance Minister Jim) Flaherty is in the middle of listening to the needs of Canadians from coast to coast and he will present the budget not this morning, but in the coming weeks and months."
Environmentalists and the NDP and Bloc Quebecois have repeatedly called for an end to programs introduced in 1997 that allow oil companies to write off their startup costs with breaks on taxes and royalties. While it helped kick-start development in the 1990s -- when oil prices languished below $15 US per barrel -- critics say the industry now makes record profits.
Stelmach has promised a review of the oilsands royalty regime. The deal charges companies one per cent royalties of a project's gross revenues until their investment is paid off. Then the rate jumps to about 25 per cent of net revenue.
Pierre Alvarez, president of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, noted Prime Minister Stephen Harper promised weeks ago not to adjust the tax structure that's been so successful at drawing investment into the northern Alberta oilsands.
"He said there would be no changes to the oilsands fiscal regime as part of the budget -- those are the prime minister's words," Alvarez said. "We have not heard that there would be any fiscal changes and we are proceeding on that basis."
Former Edmonton Liberal MP Anne McLellan, who helped negotiate the federal/provincial oilsands deal now in place, said energy companies have come to rely on the agreement and appreciate the certainty. There are more than $100 billion worth of oilsands developments on the drawing board.
"It's been absolutely key to the prosperity of this province," said the former deputy prime minister. "I find it very interesting if this Conservative government is suggesting that we were somehow mistaken when we did that."
Pipeline demands mount
Enbridge: Alberta needs at least three, utility says
Shaun Polczer, Calgary Herald
Published: Thursday, January 18, 2007
At least three new pipelines will be needed to move Alberta's growing oilsands production to new markets in the United States and overseas, a senior official with Enbridge Inc. said Wednesday.
Those are on top of a 400,000-barrel per day (bpd) link to the U.S. Gulf Coast and a proposed 300,000 bpd hook-up to Kitimat, B.C., said Rick Sandahl, Enbridge's senior vice-president of market development.
"There's a need for significant infrastructure changes going forward," he told a Calgary oilsands conference.
"Getting to existing markets isn't adequate -- you need to have pipelines to get to new markets."
According to industry forecasts, oilsands production is expected to triple to about 3.5 million bpd by 2015, requiring at least two million bpd of incremental transportation capacity out of Western Canada.
Sandahl said Enbridge has received strong interest from American refiners keen to access more Canadian oil.
In addition to the Gulf Coast, other potential new markets include California -- which could be supplied from Kitimat -- and the eastern seaboard, which would require a $1.4-billion line from Chicago to move Canadian oil into places like Philadelphia, Baltimore and New Jersey.
An eastern pipeline could also access refineries on the Canadian side of the border, particularly in Montreal.
Companies like Shell Canada Ltd. and Petro-Canada have speculated on building or modifying facilities in eastern Canada to process Alberta heavy crude.
However, Sandahl noted the east coast line is the "most speculative" proposal in Enbridge's $15-billion project inventory. If it goes ahead, the pipeline could be built and in service by 2012.
But the Gulf Coast remains the big prize for Canadian shippers.
It has the largest concentration of heavy oil refineries in North America and is looking to diversify supply sources that come mainly from Venezuela and Mexico.
Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez has threatened to reduce exports to the U.S. while Mexico's oil production is in decline.
Other proposed export pipes from Canada include a 250,000-bpd bullet line to Texas currently being advanced by Altex Energy Ltd.
Altex is a private company responsible for building the Alliance natural gas pipeline to Chicago in 2000. Altex proposes to ship raw bitumen to U.S. refineries capable of upgrading.
Acknowledging the debate over value-added processing at home, Crawford said the pipeline would serve as a hedge against rising costs for labour and materials in Alberta.
Andrew Kuske, a pipeline analyst with UBS in Toronto, said Enbridge stands to gain from future expansion projects.
"Enbridge's asset position is likely to fuel a significant portion of highly visible corporate growth over the next five years," he said in a research note.
Despite increasing its dividend seven per cent on Tuesday, Enbridge shares fell 69 cents in Toronto, to close at $38.45.
We are witnessing a historic event alright.
If it doesnt go bust that is.
Yeah
And Sherritt wants a new strip mine and CTL upgrader to supply gas for the oil sands.
Pipelines and electrical transmission lines everywhere
Do we really want to live here?
I see nuclear mentioned on the front page of the Journal this morning.
Feds want that option explored.
Northern Lights out?
Time for new premier Ed Stelmach to take a stand on bitumen exports
By NEIL WAUGH, EDMONTON SUN
The new Stelmach government may be stranded in a strange inertia. But time marches on. And so does Synenco Energy's ultra-controversial Northern Lights oilsands project to be located on a huge lease 100 km north of Fort McMurray.
It will be built in far-off Malaysia or Korea and barged across the Pacific and up the Mackenzie River system in massive 2,000-ton modules.
The bizarre scheme was announced in December while the Alberta Tories were preoccupied with the fallout of the intense - and sometimes bitter - PC leadership race. Where the come-from-behind winner, Ed Stelmach, campaigned hard on reviewing the Tories' ludicrous penny-on-the-dollar oilsands royalty. He specifically objected to sending raw bitumen - and jobs - down the pipeline to Illinois and Texas.
Now we're a month and counting into the Stelmach Years, and Ed has yet to unleash his royalty review commission.
Although he did hand Finance Minister Lyle Oberg a "mandate letter," tasking him with coming up with a "public review" to make sure "Albertans are receiving a fair share from energy development through royalties, taxes and fees."
While Energy Minister Mel Knight received a similar rocket instructing him to "develop a strategy" whose main purpose is to "increase the value-added opportunities from Alberta's energy resources." Value-added is a politician's fancy way of saying "jobs."
But since Stelmach stuffed the cabinet room mailboxes on Dec. 15, nothing has happened.
NOTHING'S HAPPENED
In the meantime, life evolves.
First, EnCana confirmed on Jan. 3 it had completed the deal with ConocoPhillips that will send raw bitumen from its Christina Lake and Foster Creek oilsands plants down the pipeline to Conoco refineries in Wood River, Illinois and Borger, Texas. For which the companies will be paying a nominal 1% royalty until the massive plants are paid out. And with huff-and-puff operations like Christina Lake and Foster Creek, which always require more drilling, payout day may be somewhere in Never Neverland.
That's the second worst Tory oilsands deal so far.
The worst is Northern Lights, where the bulk of the construction jobs go to Asians, we get a massive hole in the ground north of Fort Mac, huge volumes of water will be extracted from the Athabasca River, and Albertans get a paltry penny-on-the-dollar royalty.
Yesterday the Alberta Energy Utilities Board - which is supposed to be acting in the "public interest" but sometimes you have to wonder - ran ads announcing that the Northern Lights development application was proceeding. Folks have until April 16 to file "statements of concern."
The speed with which this bad deal for Albertans is moving is clearly on Alberta Federation of Labour president Gil McGowan's radar.
"During his leadership race Mr. Stelmach made some noises about raising the royalty rates, and no jobs down the pipeline," McGowan sniffed. "But so far the premier hasn't put his money where his mouth is.
"The clock is ticking," he continued. "And while he dithers, energy companies like Synenco and EnCana are going forward with plans which are clearly not in the best interests of Albertans."
McGowan warned that the Northern Lights job shuffle is "the tip of the iceberg.
TIP OF THE ICEBERG
"If Synenco is able to get away with this, our fear is other companies will see this as a green light."
Over at the Alberta Building Trades Council office, spokesman Gerry Donnelly is also a worried man.
He should be, with 2,000 electricians and 1,500 pipes tradesmen on the union hiring hall books waiting to be dispatched.
"If everyone starts doing this down the road what does this do to our manufacturing base," Donnelly spat. "What do Albertans get?"
And because of the give-away royalty deal "we're actually subsidizing the offshore manufacturers of this stuff."
Former premier Peter Lougheed - after a two-decade absence from Alberta politics, was back in action again this week, telling an oilsands conference in Calgary that shipping jobs down the pipeline with the bitumen is "completely unacceptable."
The time has come for Ed to show us who's boss.
It's doing pretty well considering the correction in oil prices we've experienced. Should be a front runner among its peers once the reality of Peak Oil becomes clearer.
This is one that requires patience.
I have held it for quite a while. Was, and still is hard to do when I see other things zinging up. However, I think this will be one to show my kids why it is sometimes to hold a few things long term.
Beginning to see the wisdom of having 2-fold goals in a portfolio: LT and trading. Give me another lifetime and I'll really be something.
Best,
Terry
Petrobank Fires up Second THAI'TM' Well Pair at WHITESANDS
Tuesday January 16, 2:11 am ET
CALGARY, ALBERTA--(CCNMatthews - Jan. 16, 2007) - Petrobank Energy and Resources Ltd. (TSX:PBG - News; OSLO:PBG - News) is pleased to provide an operational update on the ongoing field demonstration of Petrobank's THAI(TM) technology. Production from our first well pair has ramped up following facility modifications and we have now commenced air injection and oil production from our second well pair at the WHITESANDS project.
Air injection and combustion was initiated on the first of the three project horizontal/vertical well pairs on July 20, 2006, and since then, we have been continually injecting air into the vertical well of this center pair. During the first three weeks of air injection, in-situ combustion was confirmed as we measured various indicators of the combustion reaction, including significantly rising temperatures in the reservoir zone, production of combustion gases and rising horizontal well bore temperatures. This trend continued through the third quarter with recorded reservoir temperatures reaching as high as 800 degrees Centigrade. Combustion gas analysis consistently demonstrated a high ratio of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide, indicating a very high level of conversion of oxygen, hydrocarbon gases indicative of thermal cracking of oil in-situ, and free hydrogen generated from high temperature reactions, all indicators of efficient high temperature combustion. These data also suggest that we are partially upgrading the oil in-situ. We are still very early in the process of building out the combustion front in the first THAI(TM) well pair and estimate that to-date we have only affected approximately one percent of the total reservoir volume anticipated to be impacted by the fireflood over the life of each THAI(TM) well pair.
Since initiating THAI(TM) production operations, the gross production capability from the first horizontal well has consistently exceeded 1,000 barrels of fluid per day with the potential production capability approximately double our initial forecast rate. This high productive capacity has meant that we have had to manage operations to match well flow with current plant design capability. The composition of produced fluids has also been highly variable, resulting in a poor on-stream factor and requiring facility modifications that were substantially completed in early January. Production currently consists of a combination of bitumen, reservoir water, sand and diminishing quantities of residual condensed steam from the Pre-Ignition Heating Cycle ("PIHC"). Since the start up of the new sand handling facilities, well production rates, on a restricted choke, have been increased to 1,000 barrels of total fluid per day and the bitumen cut is between 40 and 50 percent. In addition, our recent facility modifications to handle sand production have improved operating efficiencies. There has been a significant decrease in sand carrying over into the production facilities, with total sand production currently at less than one percent. This improvement in sand handling capability should allow for a substantially improved on-stream factor and we also expect to continue to increase the total fluid production rate. This may require further facility modifications and de-bottlenecking.
Modified PIHC operations have been implemented for the second and third well pair which are focused on reducing the amount of steam injected before initiating air injection and also to potentially reduce sand production. On January 10, 2006 we commenced air injection in the second well pair. Combustion has now been confirmed by thermocouple readings in the horizontal and vertical wells of more than 400 degrees Centigrade. While it is still extremely early in the combustion phase of the second well pair, we have experienced a rapid increase in oil production on a restricted choke and low amounts of produced sand. As the combustion front expands, we expect production to increase comparable to the results achieved to-date on our first well pair.
The PIHC phase was initiated on the third well pair in December 2006 and we are planning to initiate air injection before the end of the first quarter 2007.
Overall, at the WHITESANDS Project, we have been continuously injecting air since first initiating combustion operations in July 2006 and we have consistently measured produced gas compositions and reservoir temperatures consistent with high temperature combustion. This highly efficient, lower cost heat source situated in the heart of the reservoir will continue to expand and mobilize greater amounts of bitumen as the process advances. Temperatures currently being generated in the reservoir far exceed the maximum potential of similar sources of heat delivered via steam processes, and the THAI(TM) technology has eliminated almost all requirements to burn natural gas and consume fresh water as well as the associated capital investment and surface environmental footprint required for steam generating and water handling facilities. As the process advances and we increase air injection rates to design volumes, with all three well pairs in operations, we expect to achieve significantly higher bitumen production and overall resource recovery with the potential for some degree of in-situ upgrading.
We are still in the very early stages of the THAI(TM) process and in a state of continual adjustment of our operations. This continuous improvement process is consistent with starting up the first field scale demonstration of a new technology, allowing us to modify certain aspects of our surface facilities and operating procedures. We foresee an ongoing process of technical improvement and innovation as we enhance our ability to produce significant volumes of oil using the THAI(TM) process.
Project Development
In addition to the ongoing delineation of the recoverable resource potential of our lands, we are also evaluating a potential project site for a THAI(TM) expansion project of approximately 10,000 barrels per day. We have been in the early stages of evaluating a new project area proximal to the current pilot site, to optimize infrastructure. Project scoping and preliminary engineering have commenced. In connection with this expansion, an additional one to three new well pairs are expected to be drilled in 2007 that will also incorporate the CAPRI(TM) technology enhancement.
We believe that THAI(TM) can also be applied to other heavy oil deposits beyond the Canadian oil sands and it is our strategy to next initiate projects in mobile oil reservoirs in Canada and/or internationally. Our goal is to capture a global portfolio of heavy oil resources where the application of our THAI(TM) technology can lead to greatly improved recovery rates and significant long-term value growth for the Company. In support of this activity, we are evaluating, with our Latin American subsidiary Petrominerales Ltd., three Exploration Blocks in Colombia with the potential for THAI(TM) suitable heavy oil accumulations.
Additional Resource Delineation
We expect to spud the first well of our winter resource delineation program on January 17th and we plan to drill between six and 12 additional wells during this winter drilling season to delineate additional new recoverable bitumen resources on our WHITESANDS leases.
While SAGD is the recognized technology used to define in-situ oil sands reserves at the present time, THAI(TM) has many potential benefits over SAGD, including expected higher resource recovery (70%-80% versus 30%-50% for SAGD), lower production and capital costs, minimal usage of natural gas and fresh water, a partially upgraded crude oil product, reduced diluent requirements for transportation, and lower greenhouse gas emissions. The THAI(TM) process also has the potential to operate in lower pressure, lower quality, thinner and deeper reservoirs than current steam-based recovery processes. The successful application of THAI(TM) is expected to have an enormous impact on resource recovery and our estimates of reserve volumes along with net present values.
The THAI(TM) Process
THAI(TM) is an evolutionary in-situ combustion technology for the recovery of bitumen and heavy oil that combines a vertical air injection well with a horizontal production well. THAI(TM) integrates existing proven technologies and provides the opportunity to create a step change in the development of heavy oil resources globally. During the process, a high temperature combustion front is created underground where part of the oil in the reservoir is burned, generating heat, which reduces the viscosity of the remaining oil allowing it to flow by gravity to the horizontal production well. The combustion front sweeps the oil from the toe to the heel of the horizontal producing well, recovering up to an estimated 80 percent of the original-oil-in-place while partially upgrading the crude oil in-situ. Petrobank controls all intellectual property rights to the THAI(TM) process and related enhancements, including the patented CAPRI(TM) technology, which offers the potential for further in-situ upgrading through the use of a well-bore integrated catalyst.
Petrobank Energy and Resources Ltd.
Petrobank Energy and Resources Ltd. is a Calgary-based oil and natural gas exploration and production company with operations in western Canada and Colombia. The Company operates high-impact projects through three business units. The Canadian Business Unit is developing a solid production platform from low risk gas opportunities in central Alberta along with light oil resource plays in southeast Saskatchewan, complemented by new exploration projects and a large undeveloped land base. The Latin American Business Unit is operated by Petrobank's 80.7% owned, TSX-listed subsidiary, Petrominerales Ltd. (trading symbol: PMG), which produces oil through two Incremental Production Contracts in Colombia and has exploration contracts and Technical Evaluation Agreements covering a total of 2.0 million acres in the Llanos and Putumayo Basins. WHITESANDS Insitu Ltd., Petrobank's 84% owned subsidiary, owns 39,680 acres of oil sands leases with an estimated 1.6 billion barrels of bitumen-in-place and operates the WHITESANDS project to field-demonstrate Petrobank's patented THAI(TM) heavy oil recovery process. THAI(TM) is an evolutionary in-situ combustion technology for the recovery of bitumen and heavy oil that combines a vertical air injection well with a horizontal production well. THAI(TM) integrates existing proven technologies and provides the opportunity to create a step change in the development of heavy oil resources globally.
Certain statements in this release are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Specifically, this press release contains forward-looking statements relating to, prospects for technologies which remain unproven, the expected amount and timing of capital projects and the results of operations. The reader is cautioned that assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be incorrect. Actual results achieved during the forecast period will vary from the information provided herein as a result of numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to: the ability to economically test, develop and utilize the technologies described herein, the feasibility of the technologies, general economic, market and business conditions; fluctuations in oil and gas prices; the results of exploration and development of drilling and related activities; fluctuation in foreign currency exchange rates; the uncertainty of reserve estimates; changes in environmental and other regulations; risks associated with oil and gas operations; and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. There is no representation by Petrobank that actual results achieved during the forecast period will be the same in whole or in part as those forecast.
Teck Cominco and UTS Update Land Acquisition in Athabasca Oil Sands Region
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA--(CCNMatthews - Jan. 15, 2007) - Teck Cominco Limited ("Teck Cominco") and UTS Energy Corporation ("UTS") today announced that they have jointly acquired a total of 18 new leases in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region of Alberta on a 50:50 basis. UTS first announced its joint bidding relationship with Teck Cominco in its 2006 third quarter results; the following table identifies the leases jointly acquired by Teck Cominco and UTS.
Since December 2005, Teck Cominco and UTS have jointly acquired 257,920 acres (including Lease 311) at a total cost of $163.5 million (net cost to UTS of $79.3 million and $84.2 million to Teck Cominco). This brings the total UTS lease holdings gross acreage outside the Fort Hills Partnership to 276,587 acres.
"We are very pleased to have acquired this extensive package of prospective exploration acreage in the Athabasca oil sands region. We have already commenced an extensive drilling program on Lease 14 and the Lease 311 area. We currently have four rigs working, with a winter drilling program capability of about 150 to 180 wells and we expect to be in a position to release results from this drilling program in the third quarter of this year," said Dr. William Roach, President and Chief Executive Officer.
About Teck Cominco
Teck Cominco is a diversified mining company, headquartered in Vancouver, Canada. Its shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbols TCK.A and TCK.B and on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol TCK. The company is a world leader in the production of zinc and metallurgical coal and is also a significant producer of copper, gold, indium and other specialty metals.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS: Except for statements of historical fact relating to UTS or Teck Cominco, this news release contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of applicable securities law. Forward-looking statements are frequently characterized by words such as "plan", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or "will" occur. Forward-looking statements such as the references to UTS' anticipated drilling program are based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. UTS and Teck Cominco undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management's estimates or opinions should change except as required by law. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
About UTS
For a map showing all of UTS' properties, click http://www.uts.ca/documents/misc/070115%20Land%20Map.pdf or cut and paste the link into your browser.
The Company's first strategic focus is the development and execution of the Fort Hills Project with our partners. The Company was instrumental in re-establishing the Fort Hills Oil Sands Project and is the principal founder of the Fort Hills Energy Partnership. The Partnership is comprised of Petro-Canada with a 55 per cent working interest and Operator, UTS with a 30 per cent working interest and Teck Cominco Limited with a 15 per cent working interest.
The second strategic focus is to develop additional shareholder value via the acquisition of lands, which if prospective, provide organic growth opportunities and potentially future funding flexibility for UTS.
UTS Energy Corporation is based in Calgary, Alberta. The Company's common shares (UTS) are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange.
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |