Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Q is a diffrent company than twitter TWTR so anything to do with q is off topic and will get deleted... look up FUEL AND FUELQ same thing.... q was trading before this mess happened and look at the charts accum somedody took advantage of that.... sec will have to clear it up..
Yes but will your share be worth anything? This is the real question and I think It's a big Phat No.
Their is NO WAY that some manipulating penny flippers are going to get a better share price than private equity and 1st investors .
Do you agree?
What are you talking about????? TWTR will be the ticker for TWITTER that what this board will be NOT TWTRQ I REPEAT NOT TWTRQ.... Two things missing got change the name on the volume box and wait til its final what day twitter will trade on NASDAQ.... hope that helps should be around $15 to 20 are estimates...
$TWTR $TWTRQ Do you honestly believe shareholders here are owed anything? It's an interesting question and quite frankly a scenario that I have yet to experience.
Best of luck all
Twitter Announces IPO: The ValuationOct 6 2013, 3:25 | by Aswath Damodaran | about:TWTR include:FBA little more than a week ago, I posted my first take on Twitter (TWTR) and argued that even in the absence of financial information from the company (since the prospectus had not been filed yet), you could price the company. Based on prior transactions in the company (VC infusions and acquisitions) and the multiples of revenues/users for other companies in the space (the social media medley, as I called it), I argued that Twitter would be priced at about $12 billion by the bankers.I also argued that as a long term investor, focused on value, you could not buy the stock, at any price, unless you gauged its value first, and promised to return to the company and value it, once the filings were made. Twitter did file its S-1 (the pre offering filing) late in the day on October 3 and I am going to give it my best shot. Since I will reference this filing through my valuation, you should download the filing and use it to not only follow my estimates but to change those that you don't agree with. As with all of my valuations, I would hasten to add that this is my valuation and while it informs my decision on whether to buy or sell the stock, you should make your own best judgments about the company. (I know that this resembles the boilerplate disclosure that you see in every email that you get from your broker but I really mean this and I am not saying it to avoid getting sued.)The state of the companyBefore I embark on the ambitious task of forecasting the future, I will begin by looking at the company as it stands now. The financial filings paint the picture of a young company with little in terms of conventional earnings or cash flows to back it up, but plenty of promise (a dangerous word). Let's start with the income statement. In the table below, I list the company's key income statement numbers from 2010 to 2012, with the 2013 data in the last three columns.Click to enlarge images(click to enlarge)The numbers paint a picture that should not be surprising. The company's revenues have grown rapidly, with the revenues in the first 6 months of 2013 jumping more than 100% from the revenues in the first 6 months of 2012. Notwithstanding the jump, though, the revenues over the twelve months ending June 30, 2013, were only $448 million (which is well below the rumored $583 million that I used in my pricing post). The company has reported operating losses through its entire life, though to be fair, R&D expenses account for a chunk of the operating expenses. The company does report an adjusted EBITDA, and while the trend is positive, I cannot read much significance into a number that is based on the fiction that employee expenses can be added back because they are non-cash. Allowing for the fact that R&D is reallymisclassified capital expenditures (by accountants) and assuming a 3-year amortizable life for R&D does improve the operating income somewhat, as does the capitalization of operating lease expenses (moved to debt). Even with this improved operating income, Twitter's pre-tax operating margin is barely positive (0.96%).Looking at the balance sheet just adds to the narrative of Twitter as a young, early-in-the-lifecycle company, as can be seen in the following table:(click to enlarge)These numbers illustrate how completely useless accounting balance sheets are at young firms, especially in technology. In fact, the only number in this balance sheet that has any relevance is the cash balance, with the intangible asset item measuring none of the true intangibles and goodwill playing its usual (and useless) role as plug variable. I capitalized their past R&D expenses and am showing it as an asset. The book value of equity is negative but as an investor, that tells me nothing, and the shift to a positive book value of equity in the pro forma statement matters even less. The company has little debt (a capital lease) and a series of convertible, preferred share offerings, reflecting its multiple VC capital infusions, which will get converted to equity on the public offering (removing a major headache in the valuation). Comparing Twitter's financials to Facebook's (FB) at the time of its public offering (see my valuation of Facebook on the day before its offering) should make it clear that Twitter is much earlier in its growth path than Facebook.The IPO set upValuing a company, just ahead of a public offering, is tricky for multiple reasons. The first is that there is a feedback effect from the offering itself, since the cash retained from the offering augments the value from the firm (if the founders don't cash out). The second is that the share count is a key and shifting number, with conversions of other types of securities (preferred in this case) and shares used in employee compensation (restricted stock units (RSUs) and options) overhanging per share values.Magnitude of the initial offering: While this may be putting the cart before the horse, the first number that you need to estimate is the dollar value that the company hopes to raise in the initial offerings. In most IPOs, only a small fraction of the company is offered and Twitter seems to be no exception. This news story suggests (and I tend to believe it) that Twitter plans to raise about $ 1 billion in the offering, at a stock price of roughly $20/share. Note that I am not suggesting that this is the right value for the share and it will really not affect my valuation.Use of the offering: On page 16 of the S-1, Twitter specifies that it plans to retain the proceeds from the offering in the company and use it to cover investment needs (acquisitions, capital expenditures and working capital). That effectively means that the day of the offering Twitter's cash balance will increase by roughly $1 billion, if that is the offering amount. (In some IPOs, the founders of the company cash out a portion of their ownership and take the offering cash out of the company. In that case, it would not augment the cash balance).Post-offering shares outstanding: As I noted in the last section, Twitter has a whole series of convertible preferred offerings. On page 17, the company notes that all of the convertible preferred shares will be converted into common shares, removing one potential entanglement. On the same page, the company specifies that it expects to have 472.613 million shares outstanding after the offering, but then proceeds to say that this number excludes 44.157 million employee options (potentially convertible to shares), 86.915 million shares of restricted stock units (also granted to employees), 0.117 million shares issuable on a warrant and 14.791 million shares to be issued to MoPub stockholders as payment for the acquisition. There is absolutely no valuation basis for excluding these shares and the total number of shares that I will use in my per share value is 574.44 million (472.613+86.915+0.117+14.791). The options also represent a claim on equity value, but I will deal with them separately.Tech InvestorSeeking AlphaFreeValuing Twitter The value of Twitter lies in what it can do with its 215 million users (the estimate in the S-1) rather than what it has done in the past. This is the section where I am sure that we will have to agree to disagree but the following sections summarize my assumptions.A. Cash Flows/Earnings 1. Revenue Growth: The first leg of value creation for Twitter is for it to be able to grow its revenues out, from the $448 million in the most recent twelve months. To get some perspective on what the potential for revenue growth is in this sector, I started by looking at the latest assessments of the size of the online advertising market. While the estimates vary across sources, this one (from eMarketer.com) looks like it is close to reality (with the percent market shares and dollar revenues in millions):(click to enlarge)There are two factors to keep in mind. The first is that the online portion of the advertising market is continuing to capture a larger share of overall advertising revenues (as attested to by the woes of print and traditional media companies); applying a 5% growth rate to 2013 online ad revenues yields a value of $190 billion for the overall market in 2023. The second is that there is a large segment of the market currently that is splintered among thousands of other companies, some conventional press media and many very small. Thus, the good news for Twitter is that there is a large potential market, but the bad news is that there will be plenty of competition from both the existing players and new entrants. In fact, one interesting and disquieting aspect of the inflation of market values of many of the companies on this list is that the market does not seem to be factoring in the finite size of the overall market. Thus, Google's (GOOG) current market cap implies that market expects its revenues will increase to $75 billion by 2023 and Facebook's market cap implies a revenue of $60 billion for that company; if the market is right, those two companies alone would account for 60-70% of the overall market in 2023. I do think that Twitter starts with some advantages. While it does not have Facebook's user base (or expansive interface) and Google's easy reach, it does have a much-used and unique platform and an active user base. I will assume that Twitter's revenues will reach $11.5 billion in 2023. That will be more than a twenty fold increase in revenues and translate into a revenue growth rate of 55% for the next 5 years, scaling down to stable growth (of 2.7%) in year 11.2. Target Operating Margin: Twitter's losses may be getting smaller and capitalizing R&D and lease expenses does make their operating margin for the last twelve months slightly positive (0.96%), but it is clear that Twitter's value as a company will eventually be determined by how much profits they can generate in the future. To make an estimate of the pre-tax operating margin that Twitter will be able to generate, once it gets through its growth pains, I took a look at a mix of firms that I would classify as the social media medley:(click to enlarge)It is difficult to compare margins across these companies, since some (like Netflix (NFLX)) derive all their revenues from subscription revenues, some (like Pandora (P)) have a mix of advertising and subscription revenues and some (like Google and Yahoo (YHOO)) are search engines. The company that is closest to Twitter in its advertising revenue model is Facebook and the company delivers an impressive 30% pre-tax operating margin, but Facebook's margin has shrunk as its revenues have grown. Will Twitter be as profitable as Facebook? There are news stories that suggest that Twitter gets less revenues from advertising per user than Facebook, but those may be reflective of where Twitter is in its growth phase. Twitter, with its 140 character limit, has a more constrained format for ad delivery but may work better in mobile advertising (which is the cutting edge of online advertising) than Facebook. Overall, though, I would anticipate Twitter to have a slightly lower operating margin (25%) than Facebook does now (30%), especially since Facebook's margins will also compress over time.3. Reinvestment to deliver growth: Growth is never easy, nor is it ever free. With high growth companies, the tool I use to estimate reinvestment is the ratio of sales to invested capital (with higher numbers translating to more productive growth). To get a sense of what this number will look like for Twitter in the future, I took a look at Twitter's limited past and at Facebook's numbers:(click to enlarge)Note that for Twitter, I have computed the ratio of incremental sales to reinvestment each year from 2010 to 2012, and that my reinvestment number includes acquisitions, change in working capital capitalized R&D and is net of depreciation. I have also computed the total sales to invested capital for Twitter, Facebook and the sector in 2013. While Twitter's incremental sales to reinvested capital ratio has risen over time, it is still below the industry average. Put in intuitive terms, Twitter is spending large amounts (on R&D and acquisitions) to deliver its revenue growth and you have to hope for improvement as the company gets larger; Twitter specifically forecasts about $225-275 million in acquisitions for 2013 (S-1, Page 51). Based on these data, I assume that for every $1.50 increment in future revenues, Twitter will have to invest a dollar in capital; this allows me to estimate the reinvestment (including net cap ex, change in working capital, R&D and acquisitions) each year.B. Risk/Cost of capitalIs Twitter a risky company? Of course, but to estimate the rate of return that I would demand to cover its risk, I looked at three components:Business mix: While the bulk of Twitter's revenues come from and will continue to come from advertising, Twitter does have a data trove of past tweets that may be mined for commercial or research reasons. In the first six months of 2013, Twitter generated 12.6% of its revenues from its data services and this proportion will probably decline in the future. Using a business mix of 90% advertising and 10% from data services yields a beta of 1.40 for the company. (Beta for Twitter = (0.90) (Beta for advertising) + 0.10 (Beta for data services) = 0.9(1.44)+0.1(1.05) = 1.40)Geographic mix: While Twitter generated very little of its revenues from outside the US in 2011 and 2012, about 25% of its revenues came from the the rest of the world in 2013. Using an equity risk premium for the US of 5.75% and a GDP-weighted average equity risk premium of 7.23% for the rest of the world, with the current weights of 75% and 25% for each, yields a value of 6.15% for Twitter. Given that Twitter now has far more followers outside the US than in the US (S-1, Page 67), the proportions and equity risk premium may shift in the future.Financing mix: Twitter has capital leases of $71 million and the capitalized value of operating leases is $127 million. Collectively, debt accounts for 1.69% of capital and Twitter's cost of capital, given these assumptions, is 11.22%.C. Loose EndsGetting from the value of the operating assets to the value of equity per share in Twitter requires us to get over a series of speed bumps:NOL & Taxes: The company's operating losses have resulted in a net operating loss of $468 million (S-1, page 217) which I use to shelter the company's income, when it does start making money, from taxes. As a result, I do not expect the company to pay taxes until year 5. Once it starts paying taxes, I assume that it will face an effective tax rate of 30%, which over time will move to the marginal tax rate of 35.50% (S-1, page 211) after year 10.Cash & IPO Proceeds: I add up the cash and short term investments of the company (see page 173) to arrive at a cash balance, which is added to the value of the operating assets. Since I have assumed that the IPO proceeds will be $1 billion and that they will be retained by the firm, I add that value to the cash.Capital & Operating leases: As mentioned in the risk section, I did convert the operating lease commitments of the company (page 214) to debt and added it to the capital leases to arrive at a total value of debt of $299 million.Survival Risk: While young companies with operating losses are susceptible to failure, I will assume that Twitter's deep pocketed equity investors will bring in capital, if the company gets into trouble, rather than leave value on the table. I have assumed that there is a 100% chance of the company surviving.Option overhang: The company has 44.16 million options outstanding, with a strike price of $1.82 (S1- page 207). Halving the remaining life on these options, to reflect the empirical reality that employee options get exercised about halfway through their lives, gives me a life of 3.47 years and in conjunction with an estimated standard deviation from the company of 53.6% (see page 207) yields a value of $805 million for these options (net of tax benefits in the future).Classes of shares: The best news I see in this filing is that there is no mention of two classes of shares (with different voting rights) or special corporate status (which I did see in the Facebook filing). While that may change in future revisions, that does make my job easier in terms of estimating value of equity per share.The net effect of these adjustments is to get a value of equity of $9.97 billion for the equity in common stock and a value per share of $17.36. The picture below captures the various assumptions in the valuation and you can download the spreadsheet with the valuation.(click to enlarge)If you do not like my assumptions, please change them and come up with your own estimate of value. If you are so inclined, please do enter your numbers in the Google shared spreadsheetthat I have created.Decision TimeHaving learned from the Facebook fiasco, I expect the bankers and the company to make the Twitter IPO a smoother offering. That process will of course start with the road show, where they will package the company like a shiny new present, and unwrap their "offering" price. I am sure that Goldman's bankers, working on this deal, are a capable lot and will price the stock well, with just enough bounce to make those who receive a share of the initial offering feel special. As I watch the frenzy, I have to remind myself of two realities. The first is that there will be lots of distractions (like this one) during the IPO, most designed to take my eye off the ball. The second is that the bankers have their own agenda, and I cannot make the mistake of assuming that it matches mine. Watching out for my interests, here is how I see Twitter: at a $6 billion market cap ($10/share), I think it is a very good deal, at $10 billion ($17.5/share), I am indifferent to it, and at $20 billion ($35/share), it is a moon shot. Could I be wrong? Of course, but I would rather be transparently wrong (hence the long blog post detailing every assumption that I made) than opaquely right. I welcome disagreement (though I would much appreciate your phrasing it agreeably
I don't know what board twitter will be trade on so I will wait for details on the change thanks.. I change intro
The messed up thing is that if you look at the ibox and it's chart montage tweeter isn't showing a "q" added to the ticker..
It's pretty easy to see how novice players looking for momentum could easily be fooled & that is why this ran.
BuT
WE STILL HAVE THIS BOARD STATING THAT THE TICKER IS $TWTR NOT $TWTRQ SO ~~ Lets get this fixed or lets assume we are buying Twitter..
The U-3 Halt can last up to 10 days
I believe this will be thoroughly investigated . Many of the penny promoters removed their tweets but not before they were captured via screenshots.
All I can say is it will be interesting when & if we ever really find out what if any repercussions become of this fiasco
Is that the one for the ticker I could switch this around quick if I become a mod... I just want to know which board is being used....
There is a new board that is closed to posting until the IPO shares are released
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=92716212
Twitter Puts Numbers to Its I.P.O. Talk
Evan Williams, left, a Twitter co-founder, and Dick Costolo, chief executive, in 2010.PETER DASILVA FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
By PETER EAVIS
October 3, 2013
Millions of users seem to believe that Twitter has value.Now investors can start to make that call, too.To kick off the process of selling its shares to the public, Twitter released on Thursday a filing that, for the first time, gives outsiders hard numbers about its business. Investors will now pore over these to assess the company’s financial performance.Twitter’s initial public offering comes at an auspicious time. Investors are once again keen to place highly optimistic values on social media companies. After a difficult first year on the stock market, shares of Facebook have soared as the company found its feet and posted resurgent revenue figures. In this climate, Twitter’s bankers will probably feel they can persuade investors to accept a high valuation. Based on sales of shares in the private market in August, Twitter effectively estimated its own value at $9.7 billion, according to disclosures in the public offering documents. Adding extra shares that Twitter might include in the offering could push the implied value of the deal above $12 billion, at the August price.But Facebook’s initial stumbles reveal the dangers of assuming that everything will go smoothly. And investors ought to be careful about assuming that all big social media companies will do well on the stock market, some investment specialists said. Competition for advertising dollars — the main source of revenue for these companies — could intensify in the coming years, they said.“Are there going to be enough dollars out there to justify these valuations?” asked Moshe Cohen, an assistant professor in finance and economics at Columbia. “Or will there be winners and losers?”Most of the debate about Twitter’s valuation will focus on projections of future sales and earnings. Such forecasts typically do not appear in regulatory public offering filings. Even so, the numbers in the filing will prove valuable to investors, who have so far had to rely on guesswork. In the 12 months through the end of June, Twitter had revenue of $450 million, two-thirds of which came from advertising. During that period, Twitter recorded a net loss of a little more than $100 million. That loss figure includes a lot of noncash expenses, like the stock it pays to employees. In the first six months of this year, Twitter’s operations had positive cash flow of $10 million.Such figures suggest that investors who have already bought Twitter shares on the private market are willing to attach stratospheric valuations to the company. The $9.7 billion figure in the Twitter prospectus is equivalent to 22 times the sales that the company posted in the 12 months through June. Such a valuation is high, even for a young technology company.Of course, investors are expecting Twitter’s business to grow rapidly. One common approach toward Twitter among analysts is to apply Facebook’s valuations. Facebook’s stock market value is 12 times the amount of sales that analysts expect the company to achieve next year. Some expect Twitter to reach $1 billion in sales next year. If the company were to trade at 12 times that estimate, it would be worth $12 billion. Some analysts will probably argue that Twitter is growing faster and therefore deserves to trade at a higher multiple of sales, which could push up Twitter’s stock market value. For instance, in the second quarter of this year, Twitter doubled its revenue from a year earlier, compared with a 50 percent increase at Facebook.There are reasons to be cautious of this approach, however.Facebook has earned its valuation by racking up strong earnings in recent quarters. But Twitter has yet to prove itself as a public company. Facebook has managed to attract advertisers onto its mobile service. Its cash flows are enormous.Twitter is also a fraction of the size of Facebook. Twitter’s 218 million monthly average users are a mere 20 percent of Facebook’s 1.16 billion users. Twitter said it had “more than 100 million” daily users. Notably, it did not supply historical figures for that metric, preventing outsiders from tracking its performance.Twitter’s $140 million of revenue in the second quarter was only 8 percent of Facebook’s $1.8 billion in the same period.Another important figure is the amount of revenue that a social media company takes in for each user. Facebook earns about $1.60 for each user. An analysis of Twitter’s figures suggests revenue per user of 64 cents.More on Bits »In the coming weeks, as Twitter markets its shares, investors are going to press the company for details on how it intends to increase its revenue. In the filing, the company highlighted an intriguing metric on advertising. In the second quarter, Twitter said it generated United States advertising revenue of $2.17 for every 1,000 times that users are active on their Twitter feeds. That compares with just 30 cents in the rest of the world. Skeptics will say that shows that Twitter is having trouble generating revenue in countries where it has large amounts of users, like Japan and Indonesia. But optimists will argue that the low figure suggests that Twitter has much room for growth.Right now, uncertainty about the future is likely to feed bullishness about Twitter’s prospects. But that sentiment could just easily give way to stock-crushing doubt at the first sign of underperformance. In the social media world competition can appear very quickly. Mr. Cohen, the Columbia professor, points to Pinterest or Snapchat as potential threats.“We’ve seen new entrants, and these guys grow fast,” he said.In a commencement speech earlier this year at the University of Michigan, Dick Costolo, Twitter’s chief executive, told graduates, “Don’t always worry about what your next line is supposed to be.”“There is no script,” he added. “Live your life. Be in this moment.”With its numbers now in the public eye, Mr. Costolo cannot count on investors to be as relaxed
Oh i just answer my question. Shares of Tweeter — which filed for bankruptcy in November 2008 — soared on Friday for no other reason than the company name looks and sounds just like Twitter.Tweeter’s ticker symbol — TWTRQ — is also just one letter off the one Twitter chose: TWTR
You say Twitter, I say Tweeter: Investor mix-up?
Tweeter shares soar as much as 1,400 pct and are halted after Twitter files for IPO
By Joseph Pisani, AP Business Writer | Associated Press – 19 hours agoEmail6Print
RELATED CONTENT
View PhotoFILE - In this Feb. 2, 2013, file photo, a smartphone display shows the Twitter logo in Berlin, Germany, Twitter unsealed the documents Thursday, Oct. 3, 2013, for its planned initial public offering of stock and says it hopes to raise up to $1 billion. (AP Photo/dpa, Soeren Stache, File)
RELATED QUOTES
SymbolPriceChangeTWTRQ0.051+0.0445NEW YORK (AP) -- A bankrupt electronics retailer appears to have gotten caught up in the investor fervor for Twitter.Shares of Tweeter Home Entertainment Group Inc. rose as high as 15 cents Friday. That's up 1,400 percent from Thursday's closing price of 1 cent. And trading volume skyrocketed to 14.4 million shares. Over the past year, the daily average was about 29,000, according to FactSet.The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Wall Street's industry regulator, said the shares were halted Friday afternoon because of a misunderstanding related to the "possible initial public offering of an unrelated security."What could have gotten investors so confused?Tweeter trades over the counter, under the "TWTRQ" symbol.Twitter on Thursday offered investors details about its highly anticipated IPO and proposed the stock symbol "TWTR."But San Francisco-based Twitter's stock won't be available for trading until the company actually goes public. That could be before Thanksgiving.Twitter has about 218 million users, far fewer than Facebook, which has more than 1 billion. But celebrities, from Oprah Winfrey to Britney Spears to President Barack Obama, are on it. And many TV networks and news organizations encourage people to follow their Twitter pages in order to start a conversation with viewers and promote their shows.Twitter said that it expects to raise about $1 billion in its IPO.And Tweeter? The chain was founded in 1972 and had been based in Canton, Mass. It sold TVs, audio equipment and other electronics, but the stores disappeared years ago. The company filed for bankruptcy protection in 2007 and closed the stores in 2008.Tweeter's over-the-counter stock was worth 5 cents before trading was halted Friday
Will this be the new ticker for twitter???? Can't find any news yet on NASDAQ...
I have been to the "Tweeter center" before the name change.
FORM S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1418091/000119312513390321/d564001ds1.htm
gambler?? what happened to your run above .30..lololol
is your choice but stock is overpriced at this pps...if it gets to .05 or .06 i'd look then..glty
BK,,now delisting on tp of auctioning assets..yikes this will be halted before even going to the pinks...run,pos co. didnt even give the longs a chance to sell......
Looking for an entry point on this stock. How do you approach the asset valuation of Tweeter? From recent PR's:
"Last month, Tweeter turned in a first-quarter loss that was far deeper than Wall Street's expectations at $35.2 million, or $1.38 a share. The results included $27.2 million in restructuring charges. Revenue for the quarter tumbled to $163.3 million from $186.8 million while same-store sales plunged 13%."
and:
"Although Tweeter said it has received interest from several parties, it doesn't have a lead bidder yet for its assets.
Tweeter said it will keep its 153 stores open during its bankruptcy case. The company has also filed requests with the bankruptcy court to keep paying its bills and wages to its 2,500 employees.
The company has also obtained a $60 million bankruptcy loan from General Electric Capital Corp. to fund its operations during its Chapter 11 case.
The company listed assets of $259 million and debts of $190.5 million.
Polk Audio Inc., owed $1.2 million, is Tweeter's largest unsecured creditor. The Chapter 11 filing was made in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Del."
Appreciate all comments.
Notime
blah blah blah...
don't worry... you'll be able to load up tomorrow for a few minutes under 30cents... lol
keep bashin
dang wrong on them again,im dumpin them tomm...this is terrible...itll go sub penny,way too much debt
In at .20...
Out at .30...
What a day!!!
TK
true,there only hope is a buyout imo..which is why i am here :)
I did some DD on this one a couple months ago and it seemed like they were running it into the ground on purpose. It was handed over to someone who didn't have a clue as I recall, and they were shutting down stores to save money. Not bashing, just stating what I found out.
well back again, this time a better entry... .3599,am holdin onto these at this price...
something is up,buzzing around the net... http://www.bullstocksonly.com/
Followers
|
0
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
32
|
Created
|
02/02/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Twitter is a real-time information network that connects you to the latest stories, ideas, opinions and news about what you find interesting. Simply find the accounts you find most compelling and follow the conversations.
At the heart of Twitter are small bursts of information called Tweets. Each Tweet is 140 characters long, but don’t let the small size fool you—you can discover a lot in a little space. You can see photos, videos and conversations directly in Tweets to get the whole story at a glance, and all in one place. See it in action.
You don’t have to build a web page to surf the web, and you don’t have to tweet to enjoy Twitter. Whether you tweet 100 times a day or never, you still have access to the voices and information surrounding all that interests you. You can contribute, or just listen in and retrieve up-to-the-second information. Visit fly.twitter.com to learn more about what’s yours to discover.
Twitter connects businesses to customers in real time—and businesses use Twitter to quickly share information with people interested in their products and services, gather real-time market intelligence and feedback, and build relationships with customers, partners and influencers. From brand lift to CRM to direct sales, Twitter offers businesses an easy way to reach an engaged audience. Visit Twitter 101 for Businesses to learn more.
Twitter was founded in San Francisco, but it's used by people in nearly every country in the world. The service is available in more than 20 languages, and we continue to add them. You can change your language preference in your user settings with just a few clicks.
Experience Twitter on your mobile device by using one of our free Twitter apps for iPhone, iPad, Android, BlackBerry and Windows 7. To get the latest apps, go to twitter.com/download on your mobile device.
Twitter for SMS is an instant infrastructure for mobile communications. Individuals, businesses and social causes can use Twitter for SMS and our Fast Follow program to connect directly to anyone with a mobile phone. Here’s a list of all the countries that offer Twitter for SMS; we are actively working to add even more.
Twitter lends itself to cause and action. Every day, we are inspired by stories of people using Twitter to help make the world a better place in unexpected ways. Visit stories.twitter.com to learn more.
And with just a Tweet, millions of people learn about or show their support for positive initiatives that might have otherwise gone unnoticed. Programs like Twitter Ads for Good offer a way for non-profit organizations to promote their efforts the same way as businesses can. As more community-centric organizations join the platform, citizens will increasingly engage with the efforts taking place to move their community forward. Follow @TwitterGood and @TwitterSF for more on these topics.
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |