Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I am toasted with garlic like in 1789 party
about time-- he messed with the wrong guys this time!
Do you know Dubuffet a great artist from France : l'art brut
You have a beautiful sculpture in New York
Better than the bull and bear complotists
Where the comedy never stops...
Ask the CEO to buyback all if possible
I'll sell ya mine.
Do you know if he can buy my gocom shares ?
For which price ?
You have gocom, what is gocom?
Mr. Fu's the CEO right?
Try DEWM if you have money
It seems to be good now
I have gocom but tarsier is the same kind company
Everyone in the $TAER POFS has been scammed. Here's a copy of the summons submitted by Alcoa's lawyers.
http://courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Alcoa.pdf
You think ?
I thought it was a robocop machine problem between bid and ask
The litigation statement says Tarsier (which is only Ike Sutton), had proven itself dishonest, untrustworthy, and unreliable.
Why this company didn t manage ?
The chairman was a good man anyway
IMO he bit off more than he can chew (with Alcoa).
The reason Ike went dark is likely to avoid the Alcoa legal team (dumb), and maybe also try to evade repayment (even more dumb).
You remember I always said Ike was a smart crook, at least smart enough not to get nailed, but this time he overplayed his hand. I read the entire brief, and while Ike might screw the lives of penny stock gamblers in his various scams, he's not going to rip off Alcoa or NYISO, and get away with it.
There's at a minimum breach of contract and fraud on the civil side. Likely much more, and then it'll become a criminal case.
FYI--we went dark(filing)
thats my vote--LOL
Jail for Ike Sutton.
Ike cannot pay them back--what other choice is there?
Will ALCOA now have a sub co???? TAER???
Ike screwed with the wrong guys this time-- a large company-they will get JUSTICE.
$TAER POFS scam run by Ike Sutton
Tarsier vs. Alcoa summons and complaint
http://courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Alcoa.pdf
Penny stock scammer Ike Sutton tries to screw Alcoa
CANTON, N.Y. (CN) – Aluminum-production giant Alcoa claims in court that a former business partner tried to bait it into renegotiating by refusing to pay out $700,000 owed from a New York state energy-reduction program.
The deal dates back to 2013, according to the complaint, which Alcoa filed up by the Canadian border in St. Lawrence County Supreme Court.
Alcoa says it had a successful contract for two years, helping Demansys Energy to reduce its electricity consumption at one of its smelters in exchange for revenue under a program run by New York’s power grid operator.
After Tarsier bought out Demansys in December 2015, however, the complaint says Tarsier’s CEO dangled payments Alcoa was owed as leverage to negotiate a new contract.
The maneuver in March 2016 caused Alcoa to back out of the energy-reduction program almost immediately, according to the complaint. Alcoa says it terminated its contract with Tarser a month later and signed on with a new service provider in September, but that the process cost $900,000 in revenue.
Run by the New York Independent Service Operator, the state’s electricity-reduction program is designed to ease the stress on the power grid in the state. Energy-management companies like Demansys and Tarsier that receive payments under the program are then required to pass along to energy users.
Under the Demansys agreement, Alcoa says it was owed 80 percent of the monthly revenues, as well as compensation for low production costs associated with the lower energy consumption and a portion of the revenues to offset hardware and software costs. Demansys, which is not a party to the Dec. 19 complaint, would take the remaining 20 percent of the remaining revenues under the agreement.
Despite meeting the contract’s terms initially, Demansys began missing its monthly obligations to Alcoa in May 2015, according to the complaint.
When Tarsier acquired Demansys in December, Alcoa says it was owed roughly $600,000. Tarsier allegedly resumed making weekly payments to Alcoa until the payments stopped altogether in March.
Alcoa claims it withdrew its smelter from the program and notified the state. It says Tarsier CEO Isaac Sutton admitted to withholding Alcoa’s payments during a call two weeks later because the contract was not profitable to Tarsier.
Sutton, also a defendant in the complaint, then allegedly said Alcoa would not be paid any further revenues unless it entered into a new four-year contract that also allowed Tarsier to generate more substantial revenue through the NYISO program. In return for the more favorable contract, according to the complaint, Sutton offered to pay $250,000 of the $700,000 owed.
Alcoa says it later learned that Tarsier had reintroduced the smelter into the state program at least three times without Alcoa’s consent.
Tarsier is a technology company with a number of energy-saving business solutions, including LED lights and solar farm development. A representative for the company has not returned a voicemail seeking comment left in the general mailbox.
Alcoa is represented by John Nutter, an attorney with the firm Woods Oviatt Gilman in Rochester, N.Y.
http://www.courthousenews.com/held-over-a-700k-barrel-alcoa-says/
Hopefully Alcoa is the straw that breaks this camel's back. I'd bet my Gocom(?) shares that Alcoa's $750k is already spent chasing debts. I'd feel sorry for him if he has to start listing his business address as "W. George Washington Bridge - Blue Tarp #12, New York, NY 10016"
Go Woods Oviatt Gilman!
If u Google "Alcoa vs. Tarsier"
Look for courthouse news, you'll see the complaint.
do you have a link???
The fact that he can. There's any number of lawsuits that have been filed against him and his companies but he just keeps going. He learned the pretend to be a CEO of a bogus company trick somewhere, he's good at it and he and his assets are pretty much un-gettable.
he has never thought of shareholders--IMO-- he LINES his POCKETS with their cash. At least that has been his history.
So far he has not had a chance with this position-- his presents was alerted from the beginning.
Check the chart- especially the vol-he never had a chance!
A dollar high and fast track downward.. No chance to PUMP and dump!
If he was HONEST--go PRIVATE!
What makes him do this? It doesn't benefit any of the shareholders
YES-its TRUE! now its non-reporting-- big surprise!
What up brother?
If you recall how GOIG started, the stock price was run down to around $0.0002 before beginning its explosive run. Then the stock was heavily diluted with hundreds of millions / billions of shares hit as Go-800 was launched and for months after that.
Very soon possible who knows ?
The naked short seller idea coming from the tankest stocks ?
IMO YES!!!!!!!!! or greys!
I wonder if this is the beginning of the run down to $0.0001.
Yes, I always keep an eye on his POS--just to warn others
He is the sht, isnt he
from a buck to a nickle-- way to go IKE!
They are afraid it will impact negativly the business
NO INFO pink--what a surprise! NOT!
Because he had only copy patents
Not real because the style patents with royalties payement with charges only from salaries doesnt exist
It is sample simple in fact at the beginning
It was cataclystmic for shareholders :;/-()
Ike Sutton had two shots at delivering a revenue generating company to the market in recent years through GOIG and SAVW. In fact he never booked $0.01 revenues let alone profits.
Mr. Sutton could have set up a lemonade stand and generated more revenue, with far less capital at risk than he's done through any of his public companies. The track record speaks for itself.
It was 0.06 but for a short time and my sister is born in 1967
Followers
|
14
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
430
|
Created
|
02/25/14
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |