Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
SPRV
Supurva Healthcare Group,
Inc 5112 West Taft Rd., Suite M
Liverpool, NY 13088
Supplemental Information Disclosure for Supurva Healthcare Group, Inc. (the “Company”):
The Company has entered into a $50,000.00 10% convertible promissory note agreement with an unrelated third party (the “Note”). The Note matures August 24, 2023 and is convertible into the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 55% of the average closing price of the Company’s common stock during the 20 consecutive Trading Days prior to the date on which Holder elects to convert all or part of the Note.
AND
The Company has entered into a $50,000.00 10% convertible promissory note agreement with a related party (the “Note”). The Note matures October 5, 2023 and is convertible into the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 55% of the average closing price of the Company’s common stock during the 20 consecutive Trading Days prior to the date on which Holder elects to convert all or part of the Note.
I am sending emails to the sec everyday starting Monday.
I want Murphy “s gang behind bars asap
Sprv
Like I said... not knowing all the bottoms claimed , nor caring to know about all the bottoms claimed, can only lead to an ill informed aka cherry picked conclusion. PERIOD.
For what?
I don't disagree that he hasn't been a great CEO in terms of increasing value of the company and stock. That isn't a crime.
His disclosures, quarterly and annual, have been sloppy, but I don't think criminal. I don't think there is fraud there, that I can see. Strickland is the one who signed off on the disclosures anyway. He has the power, and I don't think Murphy has much, if anything, in the way of actual power.
I suppose you can make a claim that the PRs that suggested they were buying buildings were misleading, but a case can be made that there was an honest effort and being a real estate company involved in medical office buildings. While we may not believe it, I don't think that's enough to send him to jail.
I am concerned that investors who shared this stock with local investing groups, like maybe a church group, may have lost a significant amount of money, and wish to seek recovery, but losing money isn't enough to put Murphy in jail. However, I can understand how satisfying that could be.
No, it really isn't cherry picking the facts. A trader having an opinion about a bottom isn't really the point. It's not really a fact about the company or the stock. It's an opinion which may or may not be right. But, claiming that there were no bottoms to trade off of is cherry picking the facts. That's the only way to call it. SMH.
Yes, there were paid promotions.
Yes, it appears that the whole buying building thing was false, and thus the PRs the company released were probably misleading.
Yes, the price drop is significant, and yes, the likely outcome is a 0.0001 price point and then probably a reverse split.
While the company never said that they were a SPAC, calling themselves a "Blank Check Company" is close enough so that the average investor or trader would consider it a SPAC, so that was misleading by the company.
Yes, there is significant dilution and yes, that's the only business the company seems to be involved in.
Yes, they did promote themselves as a potential REIT, and there is some evidence that they weren't genuine in that claim.
So, I think we are agreeing in large part about the state of the company and the stock, and the quality of management.
There was much discussion about $.027, and claims about “bottoms”. I use the search feature to follow up those so-called “bottoms”. It’s simple, and the baseless claims are rarely, if ever, correct.
Unfortunately I believe there will always be traders promoting these OTC pump-n-dumps. For myself, I prefer to be cautious and do my thorough DD rather than feed false information to promote potential fraud.
Bottom line, I don’t buy these promoted scams like SPRV, and absolutely nothing by Paul Strickland. He merely enlists nominees to use as a front - Murphy and Kellas are two who popped up repeatedly.
Then that is cherry picking the facts to present a desired narrative. Traders deserve to be told the whole story.
I don't remember all the claimed bottoms, nor do I really care to know all of them. I remember much discussion about 0.027, but some of the others I don't remember. I think just about at any price point, someone will declare a bottom, and they all aren't worth addressing. You are correct, the trajectory is clearly down, and there is significant dilution. I see 0.0003 now, but I would agree that 0.0001 is likely in the near future. It's hard to come to any other conclusion at the moment. At that point, a reverse split becomes more reasonable, though they might not go 1:1000. From an educational standpoint, watching the downward spiral of this company and stock is quite illuminating. Yet, if there was actual management that wanted to run a business, there were multiple opportunities to make it work, even on the way down. It seems Strickland isn't interested in making this an actual business, just in sucking the life out of this by dilution. Yes, I know that point was correctly made before the last reverse split. I guess he can keep this up until no one wants to buy the stock he issues.
Now that there is some factual due diligence.
There have been so many called "bottoms" and "times to take a position" bullcrap to fill a book. The lowlife doing that crap only mentions the ones that actually did something worth talking about.
And talk is all it was .... the fraudster self appointed itself to genius status.
Lmfao nope no genius just another deceiver low life scumbag.
SPRV was called a “bottom” during the paid promo, i.e. as in We are at the bottom here. It’s easy to see, just research ‘bottom’ in May 2021, then search the historical prices:
Here are some numbers to let us remember that period:
Opened at $.027 on Monday 04/26/21
04/26/21 - 04/30/21:
Closed at .022 on Monday
Closed at .0189 on Tuesday
Closed at .018 on Wednesday
Closed at .0164 Thursday
Closed at .0153 Friday
05/03/21 - 05/07/21
Closed at $.0154 Monday
Closed at $.0147 Tuesday
Closed at $.0142 Wednesday
Closed at $.0139 Thursday
Closed at $.01305 Friday
05/10/21 - 05//14/21
Closed at $.0123 Monday
Closed at $.0101 Tuesday
Closed at $.0111 Wednesday
Closed at $.015 Thursday
Closed at $.0083 Friday
Obviously it was Not a bottom….And it’s continued to fall. Today SPRV is currently $.0002.
Fascinating...and yet I don't get the point.
Anyway, SPRV is a Stinky Pinky Scam so it is trading in the right area at this point..
Actually lower is better.
Actually having this POS aka SPRV completely taken out is the best..
but until then.. .0001 or .00001
And NO BID is good
Nice Sell Col today.
Oh bullshit.
May wanna go back and READ ALL THE CLAIMED BOTTOMS NOT JUST THE ONES THAT BLIPPED.
EOM
I don't remember the claim of 0.018 being called the bottom. It obviously wasn't, even for the short term, with a brief look at the chart. 0.027 was called a bottom, and it was for a couple of dead-cat type bounces before it resumed a downward trajectory. The long-term trend still remains downward, and 0.0001 is not out of the question, even in the near future. The question really is whether 0.0002 is a bottom for short-term trading, and that may be. We'll see how this shakes out. This doesn't change or effect positions of whether this is a great company (not sure how many hold this position) or a scam company and stock, and I know there are those who hold this view. Sadly, for longs, there is evidence to back up that claim.
Along with a lower than low 2 bit con artist promotion.
Yes, more $.0002s printing! Funny to think that it was claimed SPRV was a so called bottom @ $.018. SMH
Last I saw it’s $.00025…the last trade was for $2.50, total. What a horrid Paul L. Strickland stock.
SPRV DILUTION:
8/31/22 to 9/30/22 (1 month) there were these increases:
212,243,111 increase in outstanding shares
111,111,111 increase in unrestricted shares
111,111,111 increase in shares held at DTC
OS a/o 01/01/22: 629,144,530
OS a/o 09/30/22: 1,341,008,743
WOW... more .0002s printing today...
.0001s around the corner....
no doubt about it.
Just think a few days ago it was .00045-.0005
WHO KNEW those were the good ol' days. (well, lots of people, that's why there has been selling. Getting out before .0001)
Oct 17 2022 0.0002 -0.0001 -33.34% 0.0002 0.0003 0.0002 9,964,033
Oct 14 2022 0.0003 0.00 0.0% 0.0003 0.00035 0.0003 66,682,230
Oct 13 2022 0.0003 -0.0001 -25.0% 0.0004 0.0004 0.0003 23,882,506
Oct 12 2022 0.0004 -0.0001 -20.0% 0.0005 0.0005 0.0003 17,754,101
Oct 11 2022 0.0005 0.00 0.0% 0.0004 0.0005 0.0004 310,252
Oct 10 2022 0.0005 0.00005 11.11% 0.0003 0.0005 0.0003 900,450
Oct 07 2022 0.00045 0.00 0.0% 0.0004 0.00045 0.0004 4,375,501
Oct 06 2022 0.00045 0.00 0.0% 0.0004 0.00045 0.0004 13,344,946
Oct 05 2022 0.00045 0.00 0.0% 0.0004 0.00045 0.0004 11,114,052
Oct 04 2022 0.00045 0.00 0.0% 0.00045 0.00045 0.0004 2,600,001
Oct 03 2022 0.00045 0.00 0.0% 0.00045 0.0005 0.0004 3,548,40
I dont care when the next reverse split will take place.
Fact is I have not ever believed a single word from ANYONE that my DD reveals is dishonest and there have been many many many not to be believed.
Not ever.
So, when do you think they will have the next reverse split?
I was not saying that they won't do a reverse split, just that I think that they won't do it soon, for the 2 reasons that I have. I also suggested that, given this is the OTC, that it could be sooner, but my expectations were later. Even for a "scammer" or "scumbag" like Strickland, I think he will wait. I could be wrong, and if so, it won't be the last time that I am wrong. However, perhaps after 5 to 10 billion more shares, or if the stock languishes at 0.0001 again, then they will execute another reverse split. It's not there now, though if the current price trend continues, it will reach that price milestone in the near future, though maybe not before the end of the year.
As I have suggested before, this is not a good company. No revenue, no assets, no real hope of either, at the moment. I did think they had a realistic shot at having both assets and revenue over a year ago. That obviously didn't happen. They didn't seem to want to succeed. The stock, long-term, has not been a good one either. There have been some short-term swings that some have taken advantage of, though.
I agree that Stickland does not have a good history with the stocks he operates and controls. It's easy to defend the claim that he is a "Scumbag", as you describe. This pairing of Murphy and Strickland hasn't produced any good results in the 2 companies they are involved in that I have checked. Those 2 companies have remarkable parallels in real estate purchases followed by reversion of the merger agreements that were nearly at the same time. That, to me, speaks volumes about the value of the investments here.
So, I'm not sure what your point was.
I understand that they have issued plenty of shares. I don't think they have enough outstanding for a reverse split. I would think they would wait until the price reaches 0.0001 before they would consider it. However, you first point is valid, anything is possible in OTC land. This is just my current opinion regarding a possible reverse split.
I understand your points, but it appears anything is possible in OTC Land.
They’ve issued plenty of shares….In just the last month (8/31/22 to 9/30/22) there were these increases:
212,243,111 increase in outstanding shares
111,111,111 increase in unrestricted shares
111,111,111 increase in shares held at DTC
Also, the OS more than doubled in the first 9 months of the year:
OS a/o 01/01/22: 629,144,530
OS a/o 09/30/22: 1,341,008,743
= 711,864,213 shares outstanding shares added in 9 months
Yet they’ve processed reverse splits for Strickland before, the last one was 1:1000 - that was December 2020.
I don’t think Finra would approve a reverse as Strickland is deemed a “bad actor”
I don't see a reverse split anytime soon. Yes, the price is low, but I don't think there are enough outstanding shares to warrant a reverse split. If nothing changes, maybe in a couple of years after they've issued more shares. However, I couldn't argue against that (issuing shares and reverse splits) as the business plan. There isn't enough, really any, data to the contrary.
With some lame ass two bit sprv (reit/spac) con artist crap thrown in for a laugh
Agreed, 2hk! It’s really all Paul L. Strickland has ever done - transfer money from traders pockets to his own. SMH
.0004-.0005 Still too HIGH..
Murphy is a do nothing ceo
Lazy ass Murphy
None factor Murphy
Sprv
The reit again?
The spac?
Web to door? ? ?
Lololol
SPRV down to low trips, $.0004 - $.00045.
Is Paul Strickland setting up for another reverse split?
My personal fave was the Sprv REIT scam.
Recommended at .027 and it IMMEDIATELY started its plummet.
I kept asking about its price decline each week to no avail.
The promo went on as if nothing bad was taking place.
The REIT this The REIT that.
Down down down it went to GET THIS .0006
Not a word from the sleazeball.
Then came the sprv SPAC scam and the buy it now bullshit started again without a blink of an eye.
Total sleaze.
It’s difficult to imagine…NOT ;)
Promotional campaigns here?
Say it isn't so....
Wrong. There is a very recognizable name in that litigation release that has been involved with POS sprv.
Not sure what you’re referring to, catbell? If the reference is to the crooks that fund SPRV, probably need to take a look at the screenshot detailing who received what. Charlie Abujudeh is one of those funders, as is he brother, Abraham Abu.
That has nothing to do with sprv
Sprv
SEC Charges Four Individuals in Microcap Fraud Scheme Targeting Retail Investors
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2022/lr25529.htm
SPRV FUNDER, Charlie Abujudeh, shows up again in Microcap Fraud Scheme
Litigation Release No. 25529 / September 28, 2022
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Matthew Nicosia, William Reninger, Fabrizio Di Carlo, and Ronald Touchard, Civ. Action, o. 1:22-cv-05761 (E.D.N.Y. filed September 27, 2022)
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged four individuals with running microcap fraud schemes targeting retail investors. The defendants were variously involved in different parts of fraudulent schemes involving three separate publicly-traded companies that generated $9.1 million in illicit stock sale proceeds.
According to the SEC's complaint, from August 2019 to at least September 2020, defendants Matthew Nicosia, William ("Rocky") Reninger, Fabrizio Di Carlo, and Ronald Touchard worked with others to fraudulently sell stock in microcap companies by making misleading statements during high pressure sales calls and/or email promotions. The SEC alleges that, as part of the scheme, Touchard introduced the other defendants to Di Carlo, who ran a boiler room that identified potential investors and pressured them to purchase stock in Odyssey Group International Inc. According to the complaint, Nicosia and Reininger were Odyssey insiders working with an individual previously charged by the SEC, Charlie Abujudeh, to dump Odyssey shares during the promotional campaigns they were funding. The SEC alleges that the promotions were deceptive and failed to disclose that Nicosia and Reininger were Odyssey insiders, controlled nearly all of the stock that was deposited and available for public trading, and were selling their Odyssey stock into the increased demand created by the promotions they were funding and controlling. According to the complaint, the defendants shared the profits from over $2.6 million in illicit stock sales. The SEC alleges that Nicosia and Reininger similarly funded the promotion of Scepter Holdings, Inc. stock and failed to make key disclosures to investors to whom they sold Scepter stock, making approximately $3.5 million in illicit proceeds. The SEC alleges that Nicosia perpetuated the same scheme with CannaPharmaRx, Inc. stock and made approximately $3.3 million in illicit stock sale proceeds.
The SEC's complaint charges Nicosia, Reininger, Di Carlo, and Touchard with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Nicosia and Reininger are also charged with violating the registration provisions of Section 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act. The SEC is seeking permanent injunctions, return of allegedly ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, civil penalties, and a penny stock bar as to all defendants, and an officer and director bar as to Nicosia and Reininger.
Investors can find additional information about pump-and-dump scams, including the warning signs of fraud, on Investor.gov. The Office of Investor Education and Advocacy and Enforcement's Retail Strategy Task Force have also issued Investor Alerts about these types of fraud, including Frauds Targeting Main Street Investors -- Investor Alert, Investor Alert: Fraudulent Stock Promotions, Investor Alert: Don't Invite Investment Scams to Find You, and Investor Alert: Beware of Stock Recommendations on Investment Research Websites.
The SEC's investigation was conducted by Nita Klunder, David D'Addio, Trevor Donelan and Paul Block of the Boston Regional Office. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
I have suggested that they could invest in a Taco Truck or something like that. To start a food truck business like a Taco truck would cost somewhere around $273K. That's an amount that they could raise with the share structure they have and could possibly make a profit. It wouldn't necessarily make this a good investment, but they would have revenue, and should have some profits. Of course, that assumes that they know how to run such a business, and I don't think they do. It's probably better than soup kitchens, but it could work as a business. While I think lazy is the wrong term for "Sir" Murphy, I don't think there is actual interest in real estate, in spite of what the disclosure suggests. The disclosure did not prove Stockgrunt's DD, though it did support the idea that Stockgrunt had about this company doing real estate, but beyond that there isn't much support for any real projects being developed or worked on. The net effect is the same, lack of interest or laziness, nothing seems to be happening here. Maybe they will prove that wrong by actually doing something. End of quarter in less than a week, then we await the disclosure.
Yu Betcha.
Definitely a Lowdown dirty rotten OTC tactic.
Imagine being the dope advising others to buy this WORTHLESS PILE OF CRAP AT .027 as it plummets to .0006
All the while never acknowledgeing its DEMISE nor the phony promotion.
Smh
Took awhile but I knew the .0004s would be back. NOW to .0003s!
So .0004s today and the last two days... what's not to love
Sep 22 2022 0.00045 0.00 0.0% 0.0004 0.00045 0.0004 3,630,050
Sep 21 2022 0.00045 -0.00005 -10.0% 0.00045 0.00045 0.00045 500,000
Good news
Time to invest in soup kitchens
Sprv
mr. Murphy it’s time for us to invest in soup kitchen
Soup kitchen is the way to go
An upgrade over current eh?
Followers
|
712
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
132366
|
Created
|
07/07/06
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |