Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Canada Truckers had Too Much - https://www.brighteon.com/596613ad-4ac5-40d5-aab1-59f2f1024291
US Debt Clock: https://usdebtclock.org/
A(12/22/2021) B:(1/1/2022)
Paper to Silver ratio: A 184.37 B 285.88
Paper to Gold ratio: A 83.51 B 107.42
Dollar to Oil ratio: A $72.74 B $73.99
Dollar to Crypto ratio: A $7.46 B $9.10
Dollar to Silver ratio: A $2933 B $2907
Dollar to Gold ratio: A $20475 B $21,238
Liability per Citizen: A $485,465 B $491,763
Labor market does NOT matter - ability to PAY the INTEREST given the DEBT - No discussion of the TRUE ISSUE
https://www.kitco.com/news/2022-01-26/Gold-price-tumbles-35-as-Fed-s-Powell-says-inflation-is-slightly-worse-than-in-December-signals-March-rate-hike.html
Gold price tumbles $35 as Fed's Powell says inflation 'is slightly worse' than in December, signals March rate hike
Anna Golubova Anna Golubova
Wednesday January 26, 2022 15:45
Kitco NewsShare this article:
(Kitco News) Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell described the current inflation situation as "slightly worse" than in December, stating that there is plenty of room to raise rates without hurting the jobs market.
"There's quite a bit of room to raise interests without threatening the labor market. This is by so many measures a historically tight labor market — record levels of job openings, quits, wages are moving up at the highest pace they have in decades," Powell told reporters.
All eyes were on the Fed Chair Wednesday afternoon after the U.S. central bank held rates steady but signaled a rate hike in March.
Powell clarified the Fed's thinking around the March rate hike, stating: "The committee is of the mind to raise the federal funds rate at the March meeting."
In response to Powell's message, gold plunged more than $35, with February Comex gold futures last trading at $1,815.70, down 2% on the day. The U.S. stock market also reversed gains following Powell's press conference, with the Dow falling 0.9%, the S&P 500 down 0.8%, and the Nasdaq dropping 0.6%.
Live 24 hours gold chart [Kitco Inc.]
When asked about the inflation situation in the U.S., Powell said that things are "slightly worse" than in December. "I'd be inclined to raise the 2022 core PCE by a few tenths today … It hasn't gotten better. That has been the pattern. We have to be adaptable and move as appropriate," he said.
This is going to be the year when the U.S. central bank moves "away from highly accommodative" policy. This will involve finishing asset purchases in early March and raising rates soon, with additional rate increases introduced as appropriate.
There will also be more discussion around the balance sheet runoff. "The balance sheet is still a relatively new thing for the markets and for us. We need to arrive at a timing, pace, and composition. [We'd] announce with advance notice. And we'll look to have that running in the background and have interest rates to be the active tool of monetary policy," Powell described. "I can't tell you much more … we'll be turning to all of those things at the upcoming meetings."
The Fed Chair did state that the current balance sheet is much bigger and is of shorter duration. And this is combined with a stronger economy and significantly higher inflation. "That leaves us being able to move sooner and perhaps faster [in terms of balance sheet runoff]. Beyond that, it not appropriate for me to speculate."
Bitcoin sheds $10k and Ethereum is down $1k in 4 days, what's next for crypto?
Powell stressed that the federal funds rate is the central banks' primary means of adjusting monetary policy, adding that "reducing our balance sheet will occur after the process of raising interest rates has begun."
Some of the ongoing risks that the Fed will continue to monitor as it proceeds to tighten its monetary policy include COVID developments, further supply chain problems, and the geopolitical tensions in eastern Europe between Russia and Ukraine.
By Anna Golubova
For Kitco News
Contact agolubova@kitco.com
www.kitco.com
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author and may not reflect those of Kitco Metals Inc. The author has made every effort to ensure accuracy of information provided; however, neither Kitco Metals Inc. nor the author can guarantee such accuracy. This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a solicitation to make any exchange in commodities, securities or other financial instruments. Kitco Metals Inc. and the author of this article do not accept culpability for losses and/ or damages arising from the use of this publication.
Not enough silver in the WORLD to Solarize just US houses LOL
New lows for a president - or alleged president
Calling a member of the media who asked an unpopular question "a stupid son of a bitch"
No wonder even former supporters are abandoning biden lol
https://www.brighteon.com/35d101b1-546a-48e4-9e29-5cf06834a6ee
RFK Jr calling out fraudulent biden POS regime
https://www.brighteon.com/8c3867fe-4382-465e-a4b0-6ccd7e3cd9eb
Several years - Silver more valuable than Gold...
https://usawatchdog.com/vax-die-off-for-next-three-years-clif-high-1-22-22/
ok so i wonder why...
Heard Fed gone/destroyed... Maybe the gold central banks have get dumped on the world markets in combination with huge short positions made to cover?
A New Piece of the Puzzle
April 13, 2021
Profile picture for user Ted Butler
Ted Butler
Butler Research
3.7k
Shares
facebook-white sharing buttontwitter-white sharing buttonlinkedin-white sharing buttontelegram-white sharing buttonemail-white sharing buttonprint-white sharing button
Suddenly, out of nowhere BankAmerica has emerged as a major participant in precious metals OTC derivatives. This new fact is contained in the latest release of the Treasury Department’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) Quarterly Derivatives Report for U.S. banks. The report covers derivatives contracts in the over the counter (OTC) market as opposed to exchange-traded options and COMEX gold and silver futures. The OCC quarterly report is delayed by 3 months, so the new report released on March 23, covers positions held as of Dec 31, 2020. (Scroll down to Table 9 near the bottom of each report).
https://www.occ.gov/publications-and-resources/publications/quarterly-report-on-bank-trading-and-derivatives-activities/index-quarterly-report-on-bank-trading-and-derivatives-activities.html
One constant in these quarterly reports is that JPMorgan has dominated OTC dealings in every category for as long as I can remember, including precious metals. However, the new report indicates that BankAmerica has now emerged as a major participant in precious metals OTC derivatives. BankAmerica’s position of $8.3 billion (as of Dec 31), has, essentially, come into existence since March 31, 2020, when it was under $175 million. What would account for the tremendous growth in BankAmerica’s OTC derivatives positions from March 31, 2020 to December 31, 2020?
One highly unusual development in 2020, was the unprecedented increase in physical holdings in the silver ETFs. Close to 300 million ounces came into the silver ETFs, starting around April 1 into the summer. In trying to explain where the physical silver was coming from at that time, I suggested that it was coming from JPMorgan in the form of a physical silver lease to other banks. The time line indicated in the OCC reports does point to my leasing premise. At the prices at yearend ($26.50), $8.3 billion worth of precious metals derivatives would come to just over 300 million ounces.
As to why BankAmerica would engage in such an apparently foolhardy venture of borrowing 300 million oz of physical silver with the promise of having to return it someday, you have to first understand the nuttiness of precious metals leasing. Someone with the physical silver (JPMorgan in this case) relinquishes the metal to an institution (BankAmerica). Aside from the promise of the physical return of the metal, JPMorgan also gets rental income. BankAmerica, not wishing to simply hold the metal because there’s no real purpose in doing so, turns around and sells the metal to a completely independent third party, in this case the silver ETFs, who’s investors pay cash money for the free and clear title to the metal. BankAmerica gets the full use of the cash ($8.3 billion) to do with as it pleases.
If silver goes down in price or stays the same, no big deal for BankAmerica, provided it can buy the physical silver back on the open market whenever it decides to. However, if silver prices rise sharply and it’s not so easy to buy back 300 million physical ounces, then BankAmerica has a problem. Twenty years ago, Barrick Gold and AngloGold had the same problem with gold leases and lost $10 billion each. If BankAmerica did borrow and sell the metal to the silver ETFs, as appears to be the case, it is now short 300 million ounces of physical silver, which is a heck of lot worse than being short 60,000 contracts of COMEX futures. It has to be that JPMorgan bamboozled BankAmerica in this transaction.
BankAmerica didn’t suddenly wake up one day and decide to borrow and sell (short) 300 million ounces of physical silver. It’s much more likely that JPMorgan dreamed up the whole affair, since it and its related entities will profit mightily as a result. The net result of all this lending, borrowing, selling and buying of 300 million ounces, is that the friends and family of JPM now own at least 1.2 billion ounces or 60% of the world’s 2 billion ounces of total world silver inventories. BankAmerica is now obligated to return 300 million ounces of physical silver to JPM someday. BofA is already in the hole for $2 billion since it borrowed the 300 million ounces at an average price of $18 or less and is already $7 underwater. At some point BofA will wake up (if it has not already awakened) and try to buy back its excessive and decidedly unprofitable silver short position. That attempt by BankAmerica will prove to be exceedingly bullish for the price of silver.
While I’ve confined my remarks today to the 300 million ounces that BofA borrowed and sold short last year, there is another 100 million ounces borrowed and sold short since the start of this year and all told, I would estimate that at least 400 to 500 million ounces of silver have been borrowed and sold short in total. This amount of shorted silver is completely distinct and separate from the formidable concentrated short position in COMEX silver futures. It is the combination of these two separate short positions, currently totaling as much as 850 million ounces that explains the otherwise inexplicable insanely low price of silver. Furthermore, that much silver could never have been bought in the open market without launching the price to the heavens.
www.butlerresearch.com
About the author
Profile picture for user Ted Butler
Ted Butler
Butler Research
Website: www.butlerresearch.com
About Butler Research:
After publishing unique precious metals commentary on the Internet since 1996, I have decided to offer a subscription service. The main reason for the change is that I felt somewhat restricted by my weekly format. It is my intention to publish some commentary at least twice a week.
The commentary will include detailed analysis of the Commitment of Traders Report, regulatory developments, supply/demand considerations, and topics of interest to investors in precious metals, with an emphasis on silver. Subscribers will also be able to ask questions.
The service is intended to be source of market information for serious observers of the silver and gold markets, delivered in a no-nonsense manner. No bells and whistles, just unique and valuable content. Always outside the box.
Please note – this is not intended as investment advice and I am not an investment advisor. The service is solely for informational purposes
Ted Butler
www.butlerresearch.com
More Serious Than I Thought
December 30, 2021
Profile picture for user Ted Butler
Ted Butler
Butler Research
4.1k
Shares
facebook-white sharing buttontwitter-white sharing buttonlinkedin-white sharing buttontelegram-white sharing buttonemail-white sharing buttonprint-white sharing button
I’m taking the unusual step of publishing a follow up article to my recently posted public article on the recent stunning OCC derivatives report. What prompts this more serious turn on my part was a question from a reader of my public article who asked me if I thought he should transfer the securities he held at his Merrill Lynch brokerage account to another broker, seeing as Merrill is owned by Bank of America. I responded initially that I doubted that the banking authorities would ever let BofA go under since it was clearly in the too big to fail category. After a few moments I wrote back to the reader suggesting that he send my article and ask whoever was his contact at Merrill what they thought. I haven’t heard anything since then.
To be sure, the very last thing I would ever intend is to overly inflame the findings in the OCC report to the point of screaming fire in a crowded theater in an attempt to overly-sensationalize anything. That said, I am increasingly concerned about this matter for a number of reasons. For one thing, believe it or not, I may have been too conservative in stating the case to date. Included in the public article is a reference to another public article I wrote on this matter back in April, when Bank of America first showed up in full force in the OCC report.
https://silverseek.com/article/new-piece-puzzle
I had speculated roughly a year earlier on the occasion of 300 million ounces of silver being deposited into the silver ETFs (primarily SLV) that my guess was that the physical metal inflow was the result of JPMorgan leasing the silver to an unnamed third party (or parties). When the OCC report for Dec 31, 2020 came out (released at the end of March 2021), since the $8.3 billion suddenly reported for Bank of America, when divided by silver’s yearend closing price of $26.50, equaled 300 million oz, it was a confirmation of my original speculation closer than I could have ever imagined.
Here’s the problem – when using that same formula – dividing the Sep 30 holdings of BofA of $18.3 billion in the new OCC report by the $22.20 closing price of silver that day, the result is more than 800 million oz and not the 500 million oz stated by me on Sunday and in yesterday’s public article. I confess to using the 500 million oz amount because 800 million oz sounded “too high” to me and I reasoned that maybe some platinum and palladium was in the $18.3 billion figure listed in the OCC report. But who the heck am I to make such allowances? I didn’t make such allowances when BofA’s holdings were $8.3 billion as of Dec 30 and I can’t come up with any good reasons to do so now.
So, if there aren’t significant platinum and palladium derivatives in BofA’s derivative holdings in the new OCC report – and I have no reason to suppose there are – then BofA appears to have leased and sold short 800 million oz of silver, not the 500 million oz stated by me earlier. That’s equal to a full year’s mine production and last I looked; Bank of America doesn’t produce any silver – so what the heck is it doing selling short such an enormous amount?
As to why BofA would do such a thing, I have already concluded it was largely out of stupidity - primarily because precious metal leasing is inherently stupid and illegitimate. For the record, precious metals leasing is nothing more or less than the borrowing of physical metal followed immediately by the short sale of that same metal – exactly the same as short selling in stocks.
But I have a separate explanation for why BofA would have “doubled-down” and dramatically increased its stupid and manipulative silver leasing/short selling bet from 300 million oz to as much as 800 million oz.
The first 300 million oz tranche was leased/sold short at roughly $18/oz. At last year’s close of $26.50, BofA was out (in the hole for) $2.5 billion. By borrowing an additional 500 million oz at, say $26 (slightly above the average silver price for 2021), at $23 (close to the current price), the total combined 800 million oz short position is roughly now even on a strict mark to market basis – much better than the $2.5 billion open loss at yearend 2020. I wouldn’t be surprised if the head honcho’s at BofA rewarded themselves big bonuses for this performance.
The real problem is that BofA may now be short 800 million oz of physical silver without a chance of ever being able to pay that silver back, except at much higher prices – as it must do someday. At least, that’s the way I see it – based upon public data from the US Treasury Department and my knowledge of how nutty are these precious metals loans. In fact, I’ve been there and done that (and got the T-shirt) some 25 years ago with precious metals loans and watched gold mining companies like Barrick and AngloGold lose tens of billions of dollars, while silver miners like Pasminco and Apex went bankrupt – all because they ignored warnings of how dangerous and stupid was borrowing and shorting gold and silver by leasing.
Now, the whole nightmare (for those doing the borrowing) has reappeared, only instead of mining companies being on the hook, a major US bank, Bank of America, appears to be on the hook. Forget for a moment that this is incredibly bullish for silver going forward, just as it was when gold was under $300 and silver at under $5 at the peak of metals leasing 25 years ago, my point today is different. What could I say to someone concerned about Bank of America getting into real financial trouble when silver soars in price?
It shouldn’t be up to me to answer. Perhaps I’m all wet and dead wrong and Bank of America hasn’t done what the evidence in the Treasury Dept’s OCC report says it has done and there’s another completely different explanation to the published data than what I contend. In that case, shouldn’t we hear forthwith from those responsible for such things – including the Treasury Dept, and every other related regulator (SEC and CFTC), and particularly, Bank of America (and Merrill Lynch)? Shouldn’t all of them explain why none of this is of any real concern?
The seriousness of this issue is rooted in the scale of the numbers. If Bank of America is short 800 million oz of silver, as the data in the OCC report strongly suggests, then that means every dollar higher in the price of silver translated into an $800 million open (unrealized) loss. Every $10 move equates to an $8 billion loss. A hundred dollar move higher from here equates to an $80 billion loss. Can BofA fund such losses or will taxpayers be called upon to bail the bank out? Even the slightest hint of such a development should be enough to require immediate clarification from the regulators and BofA and there’s a lot more than the slightest hint in the OCC report.
The last thing I would ever intend to do is to disseminate false and misleading information, but I have to tell you that I am deeply concerned by all this. And I hope I’m wrong about all this and there is some other explanation and if there is, I promise to admit to same and acknowledge that alternative explanation. However, all of this is eerily reminiscent of my complaints about leasing decades ago which were brushed aside by those who should have known better.
https://www.investmentrarities.com/ted-butler-commentary-march-13-2001/
If you have an account at Merrill Lynch or Bank of America and share my concerns, please feel free to ask them about this and send them anything I’ve written – likewise with the regulators or anyone you can think of. I’m not in the business of sensationalizing or providing false information and desire very much to put this matter to rest.
As far as a yearend review, that seems rather beside the point now, but, in fact, I just gave you the actual review of silver over the past two years. The entire explanation for why silver has behaved as it has pricewise over this time is a combination of what transpired in COMEX futures positioning and as a result of Bank of America first borrowing and then selling short (dumping) that physical metal on the market. Everything else pales in comparison. As far as what happens from here, that is also exclusively dependent on paper trading on the COMEX and what BofA does next. I must say, however, I can’t conceive how it can borrow any more physical silver with which to sell short.
Finally, I know that many believe that it is the US Government behind the silver (and gold) manipulation, although definitive proof is lacking either that it is or isn’t. I’ve remained a skeptic about USG involvement (other than it being more than complicit in allowing it to continue), but I’m not dogmatic about it. Looking back at the past disastrous experience with precious metals leasing/short selling two decades ago, it wasn’t a case of the US or other world governments running the fraud; the central banks were duped (along with the mining companies) by the Wall Street rocket scientists who concocted the fraud.
Most relevant of all, of course, is whether a manipulation exists, rather than who is behind it. Still, if the US Government is behind the manipulation, then why in the world would they allow the US Treasury Dept to publish data pointing to that conclusion and risk exposing the observations I’ve made? Had the data on Bank of America not been published in the OCC report, I never could have raised the issue.
Ted Butler
www.butlerresearch.com
About the author
Profile picture for user Ted Butler
Ted Butler
Butler Research
Website: www.butlerresearch.com
About Butler Research:
After publishing unique precious metals commentary on the Internet since 1996, I have decided to offer a subscription service. The main reason for the change is that I felt somewhat restricted by my weekly format. It is my intention to publish some commentary at least twice a week.
The commentary will include detailed analysis of the Commitment of Traders Report, regulatory developments, supply/demand considerations, and topics of interest to investors in precious metals, with an emphasis on silver. Subscribers will also be able to ask questions.
The service is intended to be source of market information for serious observers of the silver and gold markets, delivered in a no-nonsense manner. No bells and whistles, just unique and valuable content. Always outside the box.
Please note – this is not intended as investment advice and I am not an investment advisor. The service is solely for informational purposes
Ted Butler
www.butlerresearch.com
Nice Canada revolting against MANDATES - UK / Boris gave in!!!
https://www.brighteon.com/a05c0065-a031-4cc2-a994-40ec5c42d633
UK + World lawyers notifying liability - curious Boris now UK free choice all of a sudden
https://www.brighteon.com/86b5c909-4378-4f04-bc91-3f9f2dd85581
https://www.brighteon.com/824cac71-aa60-4030-ab7e-2448e0e7cce2
Boris Johnson Announces The End Of Covid Vaccine Passports And Mask Requirements In The UK
if you ask me easy questions i will give you quick answers WTF?
just the cv19 truth... Dr Malone
https://www.brighteon.com/5784bcf9-003d-422d-8278-bea7a40f1744
who was bill gates before microsoft
https://www.brighteon.com/eab0acef-8b01-465c-ad6e-bdcd75ae3648
Wow... Disagree on whether you should get vaccinated but 100% in agreement with everything else... and you could even have a discussion with someone like this... Thanks Dr Siegel!!!
Dr. Marc Siegel, a Fox News contributor, was hesitant to address the recent rhetoric by outlets such as the Post, MSNBC and L.A. Times because "anybody that would make a statement like that is disqualifying themselves from serious discourse," and dismissed the polarizing columns as "insensitive and purely political." He feels people should get vaccinated.
"Whether you want to decrease your risk of ending up in a hospital, that's a personal choice. I, as a health practitioner, certainly hope you make the right choice because I don't want to have, you know, the hospital flooded, but I have the hospital flooded with smokers who are getting lung cancer and I take care of them," Siegel told Fox News Digital. "I don't shame them."
Siegel feels that no patient, or potential patient, should be shamed regardless of the current liberal media talking points. In addition, he doesn’t think people who are attempting to shame the unvaccinated even understand what they’re talking.
"This is spreading regardless of vaccination, so those comments are ignorant and out of date," he said.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/mainstream-media-insulting-unvaccinated-americans-covid
https://www.brighteon.com/72a27ffd-5a25-45eb-bce2-fa495799d827
95% PLUS in Germany - Omicron in vaccinated Dr Ron Paul
95.58% Vaccinated 28% were Boosted and 4.42% Unvaccinated...
Similar numbers maybe 5% lower in Sweden i think they said...
and you WANT TO MANDATE What?
US Debt Clock: 12/22/2021 11:38AM verses 1/1/2022 1:33PM
https://usdebtclock.org/
Paper to Silver ratio: was 184.37 now 285.88 HUGE change
Paper to Gold ratio: was 83.51 now 107.42 HUGE change
Dollar to Oil ratio: was $72.74 now $73.99
Dollar to Crypto ratio: was $7.46 now $9.10
Dollar to Silver ratio: was $2933 now $2907
Dollar to Gold ratio: was $20475 now $21,238
Liability per Citizen: was $485,465 now $491,763
These numbers seemed to change dramatically on 1/1 from 12/31 imo...
I had not been updating the numbers but generally looked and the numbers were changing but not dramatically... Then i look on 1/1/2022 and huge dramatic changes had occurred fwiw imo
RFK Jr - Please run for President!!!
https://rumble.com/embed/vonn3q/?pub=4
https://renewedright.com/a-top-republican-had-some-bad-news-for-dr-anthony-fauci-that-is-going-to-terrify-democrats/?utm_source=rrnl&utm_medium=ong&utm_campaign=1423291819
Democrats are looking at an ugly 2022.
Polls show Americans are ready to sweep Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer out of power.
And a top Republican had some bad news for Dr. Anthony Fauci that is going to terrify Democrats.
Ohio Republican Congressman Jim Jordan is in line to chair the House Oversight Committee if Republicans win back power next November.
During a recent interview with Breitbart, Jordan revealed that the first order of business would be to investigate Dr. Fauci for allegedly lying to Congress about not funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
“The top investigation — which I think will primarily be done on the Oversight Committee — is on Fauci and the gain of function and the lab leak, which is the most likely scenario of how we got this virus,” Jordan told Breitbart.
Last May, Dr. Fauci flatly denied ever funneling money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to fund gain-of-function research on coronaviruses.
But The Intercept obtained documents showing that the National Institute of Health (NIH), under Anthony Fauci’s command, laundered $600,000 to the Wuhan Institute of Virology through the EcoHealth Alliance to fund research on increasing the transmissibility of bat coronaviruses.
Since investigating actual crimes is the job of the Oversight Committee, Jordan promised to end the politically-motivated January 6 witch hunt committee if Republicans take back power next November.
“That’s the kind of oversight you’re supposed to do, not this crazy January 6 political attack that they’re doing,” Jordan added.
Great debate - RFK Jr vs Dersowitz - Vaccines
More like a friendly discussion and recap of where they agree and disagree
Nurse who fainted on TV later died and the mass media said NOTHING?
https://www.brighteon.com/350e1bcd-f4e8-40f6-8fd4-2f0172eb6137
Dr Malone 7 minutes in... likely next few weeks shift position...
something similar to... dont see how the vaccines make sense for anybody anymore - even those at high risk
WOW HUGE
https://www.brighteon.com/8df7af1c-d6bd-4a99-889b-65750aeeb02e
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-12-29-only-vaccinated-died-1918-spanish-flu.html
EXPLORE MORE: NEWSTARGET.COM BRIGHTEON.COM CENSORED.NEWS BRIGHTEON.SOCIAL AUDIO BOOKS STORE
Search NaturalNews.com
REVELATION: Only the “vaccinated” died during the 1918 Spanish Flu
Wednesday, December 29, 2021 by: Ethan Huff
Tags: 1918, badhealth, badmedicine, badscience, deception, died, medical experiments, outbreak, pandemic, Plague, real history, Spanish flu, Trump, vaccinated, Vaccine deaths, vaccine injury, vaccine wars, vaccines
Bypass censorship by sharing this link:
New
https://www.afinalwarning.com/581557.html
Copy URL
20K
VIEWS
Image: REVELATION: Only the “vaccinated” died during the 1918 Spanish Flu
(Natural News) Everything you thought you knew about the infamous “Spanish Flu” outbreak of 1918 is probably wrong.
It turns out that one of the most well-known pandemics from recent history was actually caused by the “vaccines” that were supposedly introduced to stop it – much like how the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” of today are spreading more covid.
Dr. Sal Martingano, FICPA, explains that mass vaccination during the Spanish Flu is what actually caused people to die. In fact, the only people who ended up dying during the ordeal were those who got jabbed.
In her book Vaccination Condemned, Dr. Eleanor McBean, Ph.D., N.D., explains how she is an “unvaccinated survivor” of the 1918 Spanish Flu. She continues to urge people to revisit the historical event with a new lens, which she helps readers to do in her book.
McBean actually wrote a second book called Vaccination … The Silent Killer that expounds upon the revelations contained in her first book. The evidence she provides points to the vaccines, and not the flu itself (if there ever even was one…) as the true culprit that resulted in tens of millions of deaths.
“McBean’s coverage of the 1918 ‘Spanish Flu,’ as a reporter and an unvaccinated survivor, requires that the historical basis of the event needs to be revisited, not as a ‘conspiracy theory’ but with evidence that will ‘set your hair on fire,'” writes Dr. Martingano.
“McBean provides evidence that not only were the historical events of the 1918 ‘Spanish Flu’ compromised, but also those of the Polio and Swine Flu epidemics.”
Mother Nature's micronutrient secret: Organic Broccoli Sprout Capsules now available, delivering 280mg of high-density nutrition, including the extraordinary "sulforaphane" and "glucosinolate" nutrients found only in cruciferous healing foods. Every lot laboratory tested. See availability here.
The first case of Spanish Flu occurred at a military base in Kansas where vaccine experiments were taking place
Because Spain remained neutral during both the first and second world wars and did not censor its press like was occurring elsewhere, it would become the first country in the world to report a flu epidemic in 1918.
This would explain why Spain ended up being scapegoated for what would later be called the “Spanish Flu.” However, it turns out that that first real case of the deadly disease actually occurred in Kansas at a military base where vaccine experiments were taking place.
In preparation for World War I, military servicemen at Fort Riley, where numerous prior vaccines had been developed, conducted a massive vaccination experiment. This would lead to “patient zero” appearing in the United States rather than Spain.
If history was honest, it would actually be called the 1918 United States Military Flu. However, thanks to prolific influence from the likes of the Rockefeller family and other Big Pharma globalists, the blame got shifted to Spain.
“The fledgling pharmaceutical industry, sponsored by the ‘Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research,’ had something they never had before – a large supply of human test subjects,” explains Martingano.
“Supplied by the U.S. military’s first draft, the test pool of subjects ballooned to over 6 million men.”
There was no Spanish Flu: it was bacterial meningitis caused by vaccines
It would take until long after the war for autopsies to show that the millions of people who died from the “Spanish Flu” actually died from vaccine-induced bacterial meningitis. (RELATED: The polio outbreaks of the past were similarly caused by man-made chemicals rather than an airborne disease.)
“It was caused by random dosages of an experimental ‘bacterial meningitis vaccine,’ which to this day mimics flu-like symptoms,” Martingano explains. “The massive, multiple assaults with additional vaccines on the unprepared immune systems of soldiers and civilians created a ‘killing field.'”
Interestingly, the only people who were not affected by the so-called Spanish Flu were those who avoided taking the injections. Those people, including McBean, would go on to live normal lives and even tell all about what they witnessed at that horrific time.
While it all started out with mostly soldiers getting the injections, a massive leftover cache of the shots would eventually be given to civilians. This resulted in mass death on a wide scale among the American civilian population.
“Fearing that soldiers coming home would spread diseases to their families, the U.S. government pushed the largest vaccine ‘fear’ campaign in history,” Martingano writes.
“They used the human population as a research and development lab to field test experimental vaccines … Tens of millions of civilians died in the same manner as did the soldiers.”
Just like today, the doctors of that day mostly ignored what they were witnessing occur as a result of the mass injection campaign. Instead of stopping it in order to save lives, they actually proceeded to intensify the jab drive, resulting in many more deaths.
“Seven men dropped dead in a doctor’s office after being vaccinated,” McBean writes in her book about the propaganda that was being spread at the time. “Letters were sent to their families that they had been killed in action.”
In total, WWI soldiers from the U.S. were given anywhere from 14-25 untested, experimental injections, all within just a few days of one another. This triggered a cascade of intensified diseases all at once, which the medical system blamed on the “Spanish Flu.”
“The doctors called it a new disease and proceeded to suppress the symptoms with additional drugs or vaccines,” Martingano further explains.
This sobering account of what really happened during the so-called Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918 explains a lot about what the world is currently facing with the latest fraudulent plandemic episode called “covid.” It was all a lie back then, and is still a lie today.
The latest news coverage about vaccines can be found at Vaccines.news.
Sources for this article include:
RightsFreedoms.wordpress.com
NaturalNews.com
war crimes 40 years overdue https://www.brighteon.com/e77c2184-dc83-46c5-9a5c-d98a88bacee4
They stopped the vaccine testing because animals were dying
https://www.brighteon.com/65d86da0-8f6b-4e4b-bd31-04f0896f0c7e
Silver under $23
For every dollar silver moves higher, it stands to lose $500 million or more. This new OCC data only adds more bullish fuel to the coming silver fire.
Ted Butler
www.butlerresearch.com
wow they turned down $1 million bucks to just have an interview and answer questions...
https://www.brighteon.com/e69ac75f-4705-49e2-9ee7-664de657067a
Dr Malone on Rogin and trying to get Bobby K Jr
you might get better coverage if you were COMPETENT LOL
https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-york-times-kamala-harris-gripes-media-coverage-better-white-man
IMO most promising vaccine out there... but you still have the nano particle issues :(
https://www.foxnews.com/health/army-covid-vaccine-protection-variants
Army develops COVID-19 vaccine that may provide protection against all variants
Walter Reed researchers worked with samples received in early 2020
By Peter Aitken | Fox News
Facebook
Twitter
Flipboard
Comments
Print
Email
Shannon Bream discusses new Army pan-COVID vaccine with Dr. Marty Makary
The Army announced promising results from phase 1 trials for a vaccine it created to potentially combat all variants of COVID-19
The U.S. Army has developed a vaccine it says may provide protection against all COVID-19 variants.
The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) developed a 24-sided object to which it attached various protein spikes from coronavirus variants. The vaccine has completed phase 1 trials, but researchers have yet to test it against the omicron variant, an Army spokesman told Fox News.
Researchers received a sample in early 2020 and focused efforts on developing a vaccine that would work against potential variants. Two years later, the initial results show promise.
FILE - Staff Sgt. Travis Snyder, left, receives the first dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine given at Madigan Army Medical Center at Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington state, Dec. 16, 2020, south of Seattle. The Army says 98% of its active duty force had gotten at least one dose of the mandatory coronavirus vaccine as of this week’s deadline for the shots. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
FILE - Staff Sgt. Travis Snyder, left, receives the first dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine given at Madigan Army Medical Center at Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington state, Dec. 16, 2020, south of Seattle. The Army says 98% of its active duty force had gotten at least one dose of the mandatory coronavirus vaccine as of this week’s deadline for the shots. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
The phase 1 human trials commenced April 2021. Scientists hailed the early data as encouraging and will publish final phase 1 study results once they complete the analysis.
COVID-19: KEY STEPS TO TAKE IF YOU TEST POSITIVE
The theory behind the development of the Spike Ferritin Nanoparticle Platform (SpFN) vaccine posits that introducing multiple copies of spike proteins in an "ordered fashion" may prove key to creating a "potent and broad response."
Part of the Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) in Washington, DC, USA, circa 1960.
Part of the Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) in Washington, DC, USA, circa 1960. (Photo by Harvey Meston/Archive Photos/Getty Images)
"This vaccine stands out in the COVID-19 vaccine landscape," said Dr. Kayvon Modjarrad, director of the Emerging Infectious Diseases Brance at WRAIR. "The repetitive and ordered display of the coronavirus spike protein on a multi-faced nanoparticle may stimulate immunity in such a way as to translate into significantly broader protection."
COVID-19: AUSTRIA ADDS RESTRICTIONS TO NEW YEAR'S EVE PARTIES
Pre-clinical studies published in Science Translational Medicine indicate protection against the original strain of COVID-19 as well as variants that emerged from the original SARS-CoV-1 virus from 2002.
BOSTON, MA - JANUARY 7: An LPN puts away a patient testing kit from behind a plexiglass compartment at a walk-up COVID-19 testing site at a tent on the North Bennet Street alleyway in Boston's North End on Jan. 7, 2021.
BOSTON, MA - JANUARY 7: An LPN puts away a patient testing kit from behind a plexiglass compartment at a walk-up COVID-19 testing site at a tent on the North Bennet Street alleyway in Boston's North End on Jan. 7, 2021. (Getty Images)
"It's very exciting to get to this point for our entire team and I think for the entire Army as well," Modjarrad told DefenseOne. "With Omicron, there's no way really to escape this virus. You're not going to be able to avoid it. So I think pretty soon either the whole world will be vaccinated or have been infected."
COVID-19 PANDEMIC: CHINA ISSUES LOCKDOWN OF 13 MILLION PEOPLE
One of the chief points of interest concerns how the vaccine interacts with people who have already received a vaccination or had a previous infection.
WRAIR will work with a currently unnamed industry partner for a potential wider rollout, but that rollout likely won’t happen for a year, Dr. Marty Makary told Fox News host Shannon Bream.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
"You're getting a lot of different levels of immunity, not just to the spike protein," Makary explained. "It's in phase one clinical trials. They just announced the results. So it's about a year away from being out there."
Fox News' Jennifer Griffin contributed to this report.
Peter Aitken is a New York born-and-raised reporter with a focus on national and global news.
https://www.usdebtclock.org/about.html
Silver $2932 at $22.63 undervalue ratio of 129.5
Gold $20476 at $1793 undervalue ratio of 11.42
Lesson learned: Always try to look at things from the other person's point of view and remember the past...
21 days left to manipulate the metals...
and then you PAY!!!
Physical not this paper BS FRAUD
Have fun covering 100 to 1 Gold and 500 to 1 Silver
Just takes one rich dude buying silver and standing for delivery and you are way beyond toast!
and the dollar strong when trillions are being printed - more BS FRAUD
How come you have to add pushing TEN dollars over the paper price to buy physical silver?
One reason - PAPER MARKET FRAUD (allowed by US Gvmt)
Silver $22.22 LOL Most undervalued resource on the planet! Up from here imo
Cheapest on eBay is about $27 - 5 buck premium
Wow - Huge Oops - Shield broken?
https://usawatchdog.com/cv19-booster-shot-also-a-bioweapon-karen-kingston/
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |