Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Hey Jayman any traction here?
Naked short sellers squeezed by Supreme Court
Published by AMI Newswire May 16, 2016
In a sweeping blow to Wall Street investment giants, the U.S. Supreme Court today unanimously allowed lawsuits against "naked" short sellers in state courts to proceed.
The high court ruled unanimously that shareholders are not confined to federal court when seeking recourse for securities violations. Granting due deference to the important role of state courts, the Court reinforced federalist principles while clarifying congressional intentions to limit the federal governments role.
The ruling, which could give a new boost to startups and small companies targeted by short sellers, showed a rare moment of ideological agreement in the court. Justice Elena Kagan authored the Courts opinion, and Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, issued a concurrence.
In 2012, businessman Greg Manning sued Merrill Lynch and other financial institutions in New Jersey state court for purposefully devaluing his company through systematic naked short-selling a term used to describe selling a stock a seller does not own and has not borrowed. In standard short sales, traders either borrow a stock or make sure that it can be borrowed prior to selling it short in the hope that its value will fall before the transaction must be covered.
The practice has come under increasing scrutiny and has been banned in Germany and other major economies.
Metter and Moskowitz stole munny from SPNG speculators who lost munny that could have paid for potentially life-saving medical treatments.
Instead, Mosky and Metter blew the munny on tranny hookers in Switzerland and had a good time with that munny. Mosky was pulling ~OUTT $300-600 a day from SPNG accounts from ATMs - wonder what he did with that cash every day?
Darwin works 24/7 on munny and on genes - munny will flow from those who don't take care of it to those who do. It's inevitable.
Great! I need an RMA for my sponge.
SPNGQ will be back in busy-ness in no time (literally - no time).
STEVEN YEHUDA MOSKOWITZ will be the new CEO.
David Pilon will be the VP, Psychiatric Division
Jay Booth will be Chief of Lost Potentially Life-Saving Treatments and also Conspiracist-in-Chief.
It will be getting the old band back together - the SPNGQ Dream Team.
With all the investigations and Officer/Promoter confessions showing the company was actually a thriving manufacturing business with an exceptional distribution network all the technical things like missing reports (10 Ks, Qs, for all missing periods, other business/corporate filings fee's and taxes) are almost completed. As promised, Deloitte took over and while that means as befits an organization of this type - everything is done to the highest standards (of course that also requires a great deal of money and time to establish on going systems assuring the future security for all).
So no question - everything just really on the edge (a summer vacation or two of the hard working crew coming to an end clearing the backlog and it all happens) -
So finally - SOON!
Is SPNG on Nasdaq yet?
Is the 10K out yet?
Just be sure unlike the idiots that sold them advertising and put it on their walls for all to see that you get a cashiers check. Unfortunatly what does happen all the time is that those who invest in penny stocks need to trade them and not hold on for life.
Sure...happens all the time.
Stock in a scam of a company with no actual marketable product, that went C-7 Bankruptcy with millions and millions of $ more liabilities than the virtually no assets and a no customers behind the made up sales, is liquidated and de-listed, with the criminal and other actions of fraud and more against the promoters and officers proven to provide no recourse - just magically re-appears and distributes wealth to all.
Yup...as you say - many with the wisdom to buy it and stick with it (because it was destined to make them a millionaire) still think it isn't done. Can't be with the proof being - they aren't millionaires yet.
Check back often....make sure "they" have your address to send the check to.
In fact, why not just leave it and your SS#, bank account access code here and they'll deposit it directly.
is still possible a revival of that stock, some people saying its still not done, anyone ??
Was David Pilon still trying to get his $9,000 back from SPNGQ?
Yes that continuation of his fantasy as fact (well now covering a bit by saying "in his opinion") - which absolutely no one of any matter has been able to grant even a drop of credence to...making it BS is an extension of the same type of sickness that made him heads over tails a believer this stock was destined for greatness.
It is the same wacko-ness against all reality that still feels the need to claim that the SPNG product was good, desired and well distributed. All be clear: That whole line was part of the pump and dump....pumping a product that was terrible....and hiding a fraudulent stock with it. (
Those people telling you how great it was - the same telling you how great the investment, management, and other things were. They simply weren't...but sickos (or poor/ignorant investors) need to believe.....and believe they did.
REGARDLESS of how many other actual legitimate companies had competitive products - and were identified in many posts) and how many others failed. There were even people making almost religiously devout testiments to SPNG products which actually were never ever produced....delusionals. Be absolutely 100% clear - as a look back test: If there was amy real commercial demand or viability for this sponge - any number of other manufacturers would have been happy to fill the void. There ain't. (I do understand that dreaded Spongeables Co - does still exist).
No actual distribution "pipeline" - wasn't any need. Virtually no re-orders...and what Unkie Norm didn't buy back had trouble even finding a closeout market. That left in the warehouse at Dicon had NO MARKET at any price. The pipeline? Called "Retail Slotting Fee's"...remember all the posts advising of that - all you do is pay and your product is on the shelf. Sort of the same as what they did to get the stock to your broker.
That's how it works (It is not a distribution system...and As Seen On TV actually makes it even easier to get the space as they are essentially resllers of the retailer space (space is what the Big Box retailers have to sell! They don't really care much about whats in it)......and all that is one of the reasons that so many products appear for a very short while. An overwhelming amount of products on even the biggest retailers racks are gone within a short while. Having shelf space is NOT success.
All said to point - once again - that just about everything these delusional NSS and "everyone in the world let failed and didn't do what they should" says is BS at best. They willingly bought stock in a crappy company with a terrible product and got swept away in the marketing of it all....and have to find some one - or many - to blame.
LOLOL!! So much for the Citi conspiracy theorists and tinfoil hat wearing NSS hunters! Sleepy2016 Wednesday, 07/13/16 05:48:13 PM
Re: None
Post # of 110477
New details on the Citigroup bug that resulted in the omission of blue-sheet data for 15 years:
The glitch resided in new alphanumeric branch codes that the bank had introduced in the mid-1990s. The program code filtered out any transactions that were given three-digit branch codes from 089 to 100 and used those prefixes for testing purposes. The report adds, "But in 1998, the company started using alphanumeric branch codes as it expanded its business. Among them were the codes 10B, 10C and so on, which the system treated as being within the excluded range, and so their transactions were removed from any reports sent to the SEC."
https://it.slashdot.org/story/16/07/13/2037222/programming-bug-costs-citigroup-7m-after-legit-transactions-mistaken-for-test-data-for-15-years
A programming blunder in its reporting software has led to Citigroup being fined $7m. According to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), that error [PDF] resulted in the financial regulator being sent incomplete "blue sheet" information for a remarkable 15 years -- from May 1999 to April 2014. The mistake was discovered by Citigroup itself when it was asked to send a large but precise chunk of trading data to the SEC in April 2014 and asked its technical support team to help identify which internal ID numbers they should run a request on. That team quickly noticed that some branches' trades were not being included in the automated system and alerted those above them. Four days later a patch was in place, but it wasn't until eight months later that the company received a formal report noting that the error had affected SEC reports going back more than a decade. The next month, January 2015, Citigroup fessed up to the SEC.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/13/coding_error_costs_citigroup_7m/
LOL!!!!
No, I haven't read any of Hodges' filings.
I agree that there are some well-informed posters on the DD Fraud Board. I've appreciated several discussions with some of those posters. I look forward to more of them.
Yawn. More tiresome bullshit.
You have zero evidence. Your ranting letters have been kicked from every court you've sent them too. Nobody, and I mean nobody on the DD Fraud board places any credence in those BizarroWorld claims.
What you post is quite simply wronGGG and unfounded - totally unsubstantiated by any evidence.
The only thing to find amusing is the futility of this bizarre, quixotic campaign. It is almost exactly the same as Krazy Al Hodges on CMKX.
Have you read Krazy Al's court filings and the courts' responses kicking him to DaCurb with this NSS ranting? I believe that is where one should start.
Seriously.
Of course the SEC has been negligent. If their charges of selling unregistered shares are correct, then there is (in my opinion) about $390 million of ill-gotten gain made by the stock beneficiaries who sold those unregistered shares. That's not counting penalties and interest, which could double or triple the amount charged.
In terms of naked short selling, we have the charges filed against our primary clearing firm for exactly that offense, as you know. We also have FINRA charges against certain brokerages, which I named previously, for violating RegSHO. The record shows that there appears to be significant and sustained violations in the trading of our stock by these very brokerages.
Meanwhile, the case drags on, with an admittance of guilt obtained by the SEC in the Halperin case, but no such admittance of his guilt in the DOJ case. This will likely be seen more frequently, as the SEC continues to be forced to do their job by the implementation of Dodd-Frank reforms.
We're even seeing Congressional efforts to make the DOJ do their job, such as in regards to the lead prosecutor in the SpongeTech case, Loretta Lynch. I find it all amusing, to say the least.
Ah, butt Moskowitz did in fact swindle you, nott the SEC.
The SEC was nott 'negligent', as the SPNG NSS unicorn is a figment of your imagination.
You've had the blue sheets for years now and you still cannot show a single share of the mythical NSS.
So, what is it that you claim cost you hundreds of thousands of dollars in opportunity costs while owning stock of criminal enterprise SPNG?
Moskowitz's swindling has NOT cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars, and I never said that it did.
That's more like it. It has been the SEC's willful negligence to enforce the law that precluded a forced buy-in.
Moskowitz's swindling has NOT cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars, and I never said that it did.
"Is it alright with me that the SEC failed to enforce buy-in laws that could have resulted in hundreds of thousands of profit to me? Money that could be used to pay for such frivolous things as life-saving medical treatment?"
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119010890
cowtown jay
Tuesday, 12/08/15 12:20:56 PM
Re: k9narc post# 345684
Post #345688 of 346171
This has nothing to do with the PRODUCTS of either company, although most people seem to think that SpongeTech had a pretty good product, and a pretty good new-product pipeline.
However, my brokerage account doesn't reflect the number of SpongeTech products in my house. It reflects the number of SpongeTech SHARES in my account.
I am comparing the SHARE PRICE of the two companies...
I am comparing two companies that were both on RegSHO...
both of whom drew the attention of Tim Sykes and the NY Post...
both of whom were in severe financial difficulty...
both of whom had effective bear traps.
The SEC failed to protect SpongeTech shareholders by willfullly disregarding RegSHO. In fact, their actions prevented the protection of RegSHO.
Is it alright with me that the SEC failed to enforce buy-in laws that could have resulted in hundreds of thousands of profit to me? Money that could be used to pay for such frivolous things as life-saving medical treatment?
Our government agencies represent nothing less than a clear and present danger to...our government, and to the individual citizens they govern.
"At least one disgruntled shareholder has stated that Moskowitz's swindling has cost him the munny needed for 'potentially life-saving medical treatment'."
Actually, that's not what I said at all.
STEVEN YEHUDA MOSKOWITZ has swindled tens of millions of dollars and squirreled it away in Israeli accounts with his relatives and nominee accounts - and restitution will never be made.
At least one disgruntled shareholder has stated that Moskowitz's swindling has cost him the munny needed for 'potentially life-saving medical treatment'.
Oh well, that's why nobody - NOBODY - should throw munny into pennystocks. Ever.
uNBELIEVABLE....
THE FREAK STILL HAS SPONGETECH IN HIS PREVIOUS JOBS, AS IF IT WAS A GOOD THING
THATS LIKE PUTTING DOWN YOUR PROBABTION OFFICER AS A REFERENCE ON A JOB APPLICATION
--------------YOU CANT MAKE THIS STUFF UP
THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN SPONGETECH Tv, AT LEAST A FEW EPISODES
WE COULD WATCH RE-RUNS....LOL
https://www.linkedin.com/in/steven-moskowitz-accepts-all-invites-5977999?authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=ZYzc&locale=en_US&trk=tyah&trkInfo=clickedVertical%3Amynetwork%2CclickedEntityId%3A28818691%2CauthType%3ANAME_SEARCH%2Cidx%3A1-1-1%2CtarId%3A1467050998584%2Ctas%3ASTEVEN%20MOSKOWITZ
I tend to believe that is actually about what you expected .... and if not, as it was always sufficent for Spongers before - be assured: the big $50 threshold will be reached - SOON
Received this email today, after updating my contact information with them:
Good Morning Mr. J,
We received your fax, in reference to U.S. v. Metter, et al. I have updated your address within our victim notification system, as well as passed the information to the clerk of court, since you are a restitution victim, the amount of $
I reached out to our financial litigation unit, to get an update on restitution payments. Here is the update I’ve received:
Tepfer: So far, he’s only paid $134
Moskowitz: $2,500
Eisenberg: $5,698.70
The Clerk of Court, who handles the disbursement of funds to restitution victims, cannot send out checks, unless there is a minimum of $50 per victim. Unfortunately, they haven’t collected enough as of yet.
Thank you.
Tamara C. Williams
Victim – Witness Assistant
US Attorney’s Office – EDNY
271-A Cadman Plaza East
Brooklyn, NY 11201
718-254-6160 phone
718-254-6329 fax
yep mounted it yesterday...
not the ride I dreamed of all these years
...lol
http://xml.10kwizard.com/filing_raw.php?repo=tenk&ipage=6652537
http://www.walmart.com/c/brand/spongeables-llc-
meanwhile, the legit guy is still in biz
GO FIGURE...lol
Anybuddy found that rainbow-colored NSS unicorn yet?
Nope. Oh well, the munny is G-O-N-E and the imaginary NSS unicorn didn't eat it. Good luck geting Moskowitz to open up his Israeli bank accounts registered to his family members. Nott one shekel of those million of dollars will ever be paid as restitution by Mosky.
And the SPNG munny that Mosky and Mett paid those Swiss hookers using their SPNG credit cards will never be recovered either.
It's all G-O-N-E.
And 'potentially life-saving treatments' will just have to be scratched off the 'to-do' list for shareholders.
Yes, they may do that for him now (although all brokerages have different qualifications to do so). Even though delisted, locked, corporation revoked for failure to file/pay, etc., the shares actually still exist, in an odd way.
That is why some have had them removed already and some couldn't. Other brokerages (on legal advice) actually buy them from you for a small amount - most commonly equal to the amount of the service fee - and end up holding them in their own trash basket.
BUT - maybe he should just keep them there - as a reminder of the hopefully learning experience, for forever.
By even bringing the money in the account up, I'm not sure he does appreciate the separation and differentiation: The stock still represents a fairly large LIABILITY (of debts and unfulfilled obligations of the business), that if it wasn't a corporation (which then discharged these in C-7 Bankruptcy) and he simply owned a part of the business directly - that money would have been subject to seizure by those that were owed the debts.
topsy267, maybe call Capital One so they can declare them worthless and remove them. EOM
Still have my shares and the money in my Capital one account
don't forget the CNBC ads, lol!!! Uncle Norman indeed......
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=44413523
I wonder if Pensley has finished his court-ordered financial accounting yet. It's been about six years in the making, as I recall.
SEC Obtains Final Judgment Against Attorney Charged in Pump-And-Dump Scheme
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on May 13, 2016, the Honorable Judge Dora L. Irizarry, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, entered a Final Judgment against Jack Halperin, a former attorney engaged by Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. ("Spongetech").
The SEC's complaint, filed on May 5, 2010, alleges that Halperin participated with Spongetech and others in a pump-and-dump scheme of Spongetech common stock, by writing dozens of false and misleading opinion letters to lift the restrictive legends from over 900 million shares of Spongetech, when he knew or was reckless in not knowing that no safe harbor or exemption applied to these transactions. The judgment against Halperin permanently enjoins him from violating the antifraud and securities registration provisions of the federal securities laws and from providing legal services in connection with the unregistered offer or sale of securities, bars him from participating in any offering of penny stock, and orders him to pay a civil penalty of $100,000 and disgorgement of $44,537 plus applicable interest. Halperin also agreed to the entry of an order permanently suspending him from appearing and practicing before the SEC as an attorney. The order, which was entered as part of an administrative proceeding instituted on June 1, 2016, prohibits Halperin from representing clients in SEC matters, including investigations, litigation, or examinations, and from advising clients about SEC filing obligations or content.
Halperin consented to the judgment's entry and the SEC's order without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC's complaint or the findings of the SEC's order.
For further information on this action and on judgments obtained against other defendants in this action, please see Press Release No. 2010-70 (May 5, 2010), Litigation Release Nos. 21515 (May 5, 2010) and 22586 (Jan. 4, 2013), and Exchange Act Release Nos. 60788 (Oct. 5, 2009) and 67899 (Sept. 20, 2012). The SEC's litigation continues.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2016/lr23557.htm
Halperin settles with the SEC.
"1. Halperin, age 69...
...is suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an attorney."
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/34-77972.pdf
I doubt that he would have wanted anything more to do with the Commission, anyway.
I admitted I bought @ .006 and sold in da .20zzz... does that make me part of the SCAM?
.006 to .25 was the best it ever did...
So properly it would go something like?
Whomever thinks they will get their SPNGQ investment back from whoever they gave it to after this length of time, especially with the lack of any evidence of a specifically identifiable cause other than a well executed scam of promoting a "worthless non-business" by the principals and officers the investor chose, is laughable.
"Whom" is used when it's an object (after the verb). Who is used when it's the subject (before the verb).
Think of it this way: if you'd use 'he' then you use 'who' - if you'd use 'him' then you use 'whom'.
"Who would like to go?"
"Bob asked whom to the prom?"
"Who went to the prom?"
"File suit against who (sic)? - WRONG - yours
Against whom?" - CORRECT - mine
Gee, whom knew? - WRONG - yours
Or were you quoting from one of Moskowitz's garbled SPNG emails?
"File suit against who [sic]?
Against whom?"
Gee, whom knew?
SPNGQ shares deemed worthless. EOM
Whoever you think are the unicorns that 'cheated you'. The SEC and DOJ aren't gonna do anything for ya - just like they didn't do anything for the CMKX or CRGP bagholders - or SRGE or CYNK or GECC or CSHD or any of a thousand other similar pennyscams to SPNG.
"File suit against who [sic]?"
Against whom? Well, you're the one who claims there are evil NSS unicorns ~OUTT there - so you must have knowledge of who they are - or at lease enough evidence to file against them as John and Jane Does 1-50.
Butt the prollem is you don't have such evidence, just supposition and innuendo, and that don't fly in sustaining a complaint - as Crazy Al Hodges found ~OUTT in CMKX after filing many lawsuits and appeals against the imaginary NSS miscreants.
Oh and there's that pesky statute of limitations too.
If you're believing the SEC and DOJ are gonna gett you anything beyond the restitution order against Mosky and Mett, which you declined to sign onto and thus lost the right to make any claims against those restitution orders, well then I be sorry to tell you that no munny will be forthcoming to SPNG victims via the SEC and DOJ. Crazy Al Hodges (a Pasadena nutjob solo lawyer) tried all that nonsense with CMKX - read about it - it's all on iHub with links to read.
The fact is that for anyone who is nott on the SPNG restitution order for Mosky & Mett, well it's no soup for them.
All the wishful thinking in the world won't change that fact, no matter how much one might wish it weren't so.
And those SPNG shares? Worthless - the corporation is defunct and non-existent and the shares are untradeable.
So there's that too.
Dude, it's OVER. There is no Spongtech anymore. It doesn't exist.
There is no there there. It has no corporate existence.
May as well say "Abe Lincoln should run in the 2016 Rio Olympics marathon."
Too late. It's DEAD, Jim!
(And it was never a viable business at any point, it was just third-tier pennyscammers behind it (M&M, Furth, DeBarge, Hess, Palmer, etc.) and paid promotion of the ticker.)
All of the above cited in the article:
http://thestreetsweeper.org/undersurveillance.html?i=744
Welp, that's pure bullshet - Texas or otherwise - pure bullshet.
So there's that.
Go ahead, pardner - file suit against the windmills you claim - errr ... and the unicorns.
Yappin', yappin', yappin' - if you think you have a real claim -FILE IT.
Otherwise, this unicorn hunting is just white noise, baby.
(Don't worry about that pesky statute of limitations stuff. Draw yer shootin' irons and file a claim - don't forgit to name those dagnabbit flea-bitten galoots.)
http://yosemitesamquotes.com/yosemite-sam-sayings/
“Oooo … get me a a mouth piece … I wanna a hapus corpeas!”
Huh??? What company? What biz?
The one with a product that is essentially the same as several hundred available by many other manufacturers - and literally thousands of others that either failed or withdrew it from production - because it just simply all that wanted?
Of course they didn't have the SpongeBob connection. Oops - turned out SPNG didn't either - remember - that was actually a license that was never really made? (Would have taken money to complete - and wasn't really needed - like everything else in SPNG - just make believe for a while - and lie about the results).
Or maybe the one that didn't pay anyone...and since the product it did have cost more to make than they could sell it for - was a lusa even with no recognized expenses?
Of course you could mean the company whose product - well at least that which wasn't bought by Unkie driving around NJ - was left to linger on the close out shelf? (Who needs management - just give Unkie a bigger car...he can buy more).
No - you must mean the company that had all those sales to those great international 5 customers....OOOps, better not go down that road....like the "company" as something ever intended to be a biz - with a chance of making any money - they didn't exist.
What do you think - the "new" soon to be huge Co should get a storage house with a double garage door? That would be a step up from what it had doing all the biz previously. And you know....that left over inventory that no one wanted (because it cost more to move than it could be sold for) - well it could be put in the dumpsters so much faster with a double door. You would have to pay for the dumpster service though. Paying - not one of the SPNG strong points. Hey - have your new super execs use their salary to do so! Yup that the ticket. And thye can get paid by - selling stock...because there is a strong market for SPNG stock - You would buy more wouldn't you?
SPNFG WAS NEVER A BIZ...IT WASN'T INTENDED TO BE. ITS PRODUCT WAS STOCK IN THE COMPANY. Everything - including the stock - was for show.
Hey - here's an idea - why not have any of the many already existing well run, funded, connected, etc Cos on the HBA product market add this one to their portfolio of products? Just sell the rights to them...or maybe a license deal - thats it - get some $ for each unit they sell!!!!! They must have been lining up at the door to get a piece of the action....
Ya' think - just maybe - its because: Those same existing Cos with the good management you desire (and funding needed) in place already - know the product (and likely have it or something similar in their portfolio's already) and each and every one has no interest in marketing it, anything to do with another soap infused sponge --- because IT IS SHOWN TO BE - time and time again - A LUSA.
Or do you think it is that little issue with - SPNG has no actual anything (as concerns rights to produce) to sell....and certainly nothing to license?
You know - the things that Spongeables - the company that was it's competitor - with a very similar product - actually line of products.In the 2-3$ range. And look ta them now -- the desire for that product made them a huge Co (filling the SPNG void). Actually, that didn't happen...it is still a minor subsidiary of a private LLC - a nice little family biz - when one looks at its entire line of products.
SPNG and its product - as a business - was a complete failure in all ways.
As a fraud - it was a great success, in all ways. Probably because the one thing it had was good (maybe great) management.
Give it a Texas minute, partner.
If necessary, we will tell you "more about how evil the SEC is and how it was their fault for the" lack of enforcement in this case, which has likely caused $390 million in damage to shareholders, just in regards to selling unregistered shares. That doesn't count penalties and interest, and that's assuming that the SEC is correct in making that charge, which they have only partially prosecuted. In addition, that ignores the RegSHO violations, which were a daily occurence for months at a time.
The DOJ is busy, threatening 5600 municipal courts with discrimination suits, because the defendants in some cases are primarily black. Then there's that YUUUGE social issue involving civil rights violations caused by laws that require men to use the mens' restrooms. And let's not forget the inexcusable injustice inflicted upon society by the lack of Section 8 housing in affluent neighborhoods. And how dare we not draft women into combat roles in the US military?
With so much on Loretta Lynch's plate, prosecuting actual violations of law are waiting in line behind prosecutions of perceived violations of law. And there's only 6 months remaining to implement the administration's agenda, before Trump gets elected to tear it all down.
So we have to wait patiently for the naming of dozens of Relief Defendants in the SpongeTech case.
yep, it has been real fun, hasn't it?
say, tell us more about how evil the SEC is and how it was their fault for the downfall of SPNG for charging criminal enterprise SPNG with fraud
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=52394741
AND U JOINED ihub 1 YEAR AGO yea that is lots of laughs . You missed all the real fun
LOL. I bought the car-wash sponge yrs ago...and it actually worked...was so sad to see this go all scammy...
SOMEONE IS TRYING TO MAKE BACK SOME SPONGETECH LOSSES.....LOL
http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B002RX4FAY/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
In a search for a contractor to replace my roof I had 5 estimates provided from 5 different companies. STEVEN MOSKOWITZ of Renovex LLC gave me the best price by over a couple thousand dollars. This was too good to pass on, so I hired Renovex to do the job.
Steve immediately demanded 60% of the cost to be paid upfront. I was hesitant so I told him once the material arrives on site I would give him the 60%. He rudely told me "I am not a bank, and I won't lay out that kind of money." We eventually came to an agreement. The following day, 80% of the material arrived and so I paid him in good faith. That was my second mistake. My first mistake was hiring him in the first place. I was initially promised that the entire job would be completed in 3-5 work days. Over the course of 3 weeks I've heard one excuse after the other. It went from bad weather (which never came) to family emergencies, to sick days (6 in a row, with no communication) This company left my roof unprotected which lead to a semi-major leak in multiple areas of my home. I am currently in the process of filing a claim against his insurance, which I'm beginning to think is fraudulent. I have gotten no where. After over three weeks from the start date they were only competent enough to complete 45% of the job. I had finally had enough of the excuses and contacted Steve. I told him I have no other recourse at this point. I need to hire someone else to complete the job. His response was, "Why didn't you tell me that my workers haven't been there in over 5 days? You are just trying to steal my materials and I will see you in court!" As if I'm responsible for managing his labor force. Save yourself the headache, don't use Renovex LLC for ANYTHING! It was a waste of my time and money in the long run. It was the least professional management I've ever dealt with in my entire life. PLEASE DON'T BE TEMPTED BY THE LOW COST, IT IS A FACADE THAT IS WELL WORTH AVOIDING!
Ross G. and 1 other voted for this review
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |