Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Correct. Spngq company does not exist anymore.
There isn't a stock to trade.
Mindy's page has been removed but not Jay's.
For what?
Hey, is this what moski has been peddling now since he lost all the spongebob sponges?
https://digitogy.com/ultra-moskinator-sonic-review/
SPNGQ no longer exists as a stock. You may have something in your account, but it doesn't appear to be something that can be traded. The best course of action, IMO, is to either simply declare it worthless, or there is a form to fill out with your broker to remove the stock from your account. There is no chance of any real return on investment at this point. I had this happen with one of my stocks, as the symbol was gone, but there was just a numbered entry in my statements.
SPNG does have other meanings now, it's an indi music label, it can be microsoft open source security message thing, or Southern Pacific Narrow Gauge railroad modeling. However, none of these have anything to do with Spongetech Delivery Systems. So, given this google search, there isn't much to consider with this stock.
I suppose as a holder or former holder of this stock, there are still legal actions to take against the owners of the company, but at this point, I'm not sure if there is any more restitution possible.
Good luck.
D
JAY PATRICK BOOTH of Rhome, Texass still a MAJOR LOSER in SPNG scam.
Still waiting by the mailbox for a reply from Steve Mnunchin.
Shares still on my account ???
still holding 5k shares long! and proud...
How do you figure?! Thanks!!!
I was still sleeping when I got the call from yellowdog1, I remember it as if it were this morning....
they got arrested, I still not fully awake ...said who?, he said Moski & Metter, I was like please tell me your joking, he seriously said NO, this is not a joke~!
my wife who has an amazing 6th sense woke up in the middle of the night and said OMG I SPNG is a scam, I just had a revelation, the very night before
sure enough
your post was the 1st confirmation on ihub
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=49798691
877,777 shares I owned around an average of .10
by the time I got the call, which the caller told me the news was good, they settled with the SEC, and they are going to finally release the 10-k and everything else, the price bottomed .004-.006, I was fortunate to get around $4k from my $87k
plus all the time, waiting, missing out on other stocks, borrowing money, using credit cards to cover bills, waiting for the promised 10k, and MOASS that never came
I will say that since SPNG was the very 1st stock I ever purchased in my life, it taught me a huge lesson, that I use wisely to this day...
JAY PATRICK BOOTH of Rhome, Texass owes DaBored an update on his letters to Steve Mnunchin and DaJudges.
How's da FOIA request comin'???
Taurus69, no such thing. EOM
Even the delusional JAY P. BOOTH has finally thrown in the towel on SPNG.
Nott that he suddenly gained sanity, just that he gott tired.
Steve Mnunchin's and Judge Izarry's mail boxes will be less cluttered with junk mail now.
And STEVEN MOSKOWITZ's pergola that he had built for MINDY with his SPNG munny is looking mighty fine. STEVEN and MINDY will be going on a Cunard Lines cruise on the Queen Victoria this Spring (NYC-Southampton), spending some more of that SPNG munny.
I dumped everything when it started crashing the first time.....at one point i was up like 250K and end up getting out with minimal losses.....what a scam
Seth SHAW will RE-LIST SpongeTech, or TimOTHY SYKES?
I still have my shares?
'...Seth Shaw bought his 5,000,000 shares 1 cent in Jan. 2009. Five
short months later, and "coincidentally" after Noble conference,
they were worth 20 cents. You said he did IR for SpongeTech. Did
Seth Shaw organize the Noble conference that catapulted
SpongeTech stock 2,000% higher?...'
What are your thoughts about this?
lukechen817, only those whose sold before SPNGQ stock was Revoked salvaged some of their investment;
It is hilarious to think that those who held their stock are owed something.
Good luck
i lost a bit of change here a while ago.....did anyone get any money back?
Jay, have you seen STEVEN YEHUDA MOSKOWITZ's pergola he had built for MINDY?
Fortunately, he had a lott of munny laying around, so he nott only had a pergola built for her, butt he was able to gett her potentially life-saving medical procedures too.
Nay Jay, how's that munny recovery comin' along? hear from Steve Mnuchin yett?
Mebbe more letters to DaJudges will werk?
And it was a short story - "lies and scam of the standard p&D type" - that has been extended to waaaaay too many volumes of stuff for waaaaay too long.
Taurus69, the Spongetech story has been over for close to a decade. EOM
$spngq The SpongeTech story hasn't even begun to be told.
$spngq relisting.
$spng the content and context of this post is bs
°°° (\__/) (\_(\ ° ° °
°°° (='.'=) (=' :') °°°
°°° (")_(") (,(')(')°°°
°°° °°° °°° °°° °°°
STEVEN YEHUDA MOSKOWITZ wins and JAY PATRICK BOOTH of RHome, TX loses in SPNG.
Simple FACT.
$spng the content and context of the post is bs
STEVEN YEHUDA MOSKOWITZ just said that the SEC is still flyspecking it.
Once it's filed with the SEC on EDGAR, JAY PATRICK BOOTH will be legally free to sell his massive SPNGQ share holdings and afford a Greyhound bus ticket to Queens to admire the wonderful teak, mahogany, oak, cedar, and redwood Alamo facade--style pergola that STEVEN YEHUDA MOSKOWITZ had built for his wife, MINDY MOSKOWITZ.
It is a shrine to all those whose munny was flushed into the SPNGQ scam.
Perhaps STEVEN YEHUDA MOSKOWITZ could even sell JAY PATRICK BOOTH a counterfeit ticket to a bleacher seat for a Mets home game - at a slightly reduced price, of course, as a form of reparations.
Butt fear knott, JAY PATRICK BOOTH has sent letters to Steve Mnuchin who I'm shure is all over the matter as a top priority.
Mnunchin's been working on it for THREE YEARS now, so DatMunny gonna be a'comin' anytime now.
Fur Shirley.
JAY PATRICK BOOTH has it all handled.
Welp, except the FOIA request screw up!
And STEVEN YEHUDA MOSKOWITZ's gift to MINDY MOSKOWITZ of a brand new Alamo facade-shaped pergola!
The Moskowitz's pergola is fan-tas-tique! Looks like the Alamo right there in Flushing, NY. Beautiful teak and mahogany with some oak and redwood. Magnificently stained and sealed. Something to stop and see on a trip to NYC.
For those SPNG shareholder-victims who have lost munny in this scam and are nott on the court restitution list (as JAY PATRICK BOOTH is NOT), if you want to know about stale claims from the SPNG scam, contact Jay Booth who is the only one still tilting at the SPNG windmill
Jay P Booth
195 Private LN #4436 Rhome, TX 76078
(940) 627-2128
You can use PACER to retrieve his numerous letters to various judges in various courts and such over the many years, to no avail whatsoever. PACER is free as long as you don't download more than $15 in searches and pages per quarter.
Or just ask Jay, he ought to be able to email them all to you, including his most recent failed FOIA request.
You won't be able to gett any munny of course, butt the reading is worth it for the laffs alone.
Don't expect any munny from JAY PATRICK BOOTH, based on what the internet indicates:
https://www.mylife.com/jay-booth/jayatthelake2003
However, even if one strikes ~OUTT with JAY, you can send a refund request to MINDY MOSKOWITZ - the CONtact info is in the iBox. You won't gett any munny there either, butt sometimes just sending a refund demand can make one feel better about the loss.
Mindy Moskowitz has a much better report on the internet than JAY, so prolly a better chance she'll reply to your request.
https://www.mylife.com/mindy-moskowitz/e615708484998
Butt JAY PATRICK BOOTH doesn't care, because he didn't even submit a claim to the restitution list. He's nott even on it!
So, yeah, JAY PATRICK BOOTH is part of the problem.
Butt it doesn't matter because STEVEN YEHUDA MOSKOWITZ ain't gonna pay more than a fraction of a penny on ther $12M. So making it twice that makes ZERO difference.
"Thanks for the munny, Jay! We're gonna take much better care of it than you did!"
"Yes, your Honor, I stole Jay's munny and yes I plan on keeping it."
Yes, it was $52 million, jointly and severally. So yes, if Steven were to pay the $24 million of that which he admitted to stealing, he would have continued liability if other defendants had not paid their share.
I just think that it is lunacy to admit to stealing $24 million, only to have the judge Order that $12 million must be paid, because that was all that victimized shareholders claimed.
Shareholders should not be required to self-identify, when the law requires that a list of shareholders must be provided in a corporate bankruptcy proceeding.
Introduction of facts into crazy, imaginary CONspiracy theories ruins all the fun!
Wasn't the SEC judgment against Moskowitz and Metter somewhere around $52 million?
Steven admitted to stealing $24 million. He was Ordered to pay the amount injured investors claimed, which was only $12 million. If he was worried about Tepfer's extortion attempt, I don't think that he would have gone to the FBI and again agreed to take part in yet another sting operation.
Steven admitted to stealing $24 million. He was Ordered to pay the amount injured investors claimed, which was only $12 million. If he was worried about Tepfer's extortion attempt, I don't think that he would have gone to the FBI and again agreed to take part in yet another sting operation.
For Tepfer to want $1mil and ultimately $7mil from Moskwitz, he must have some knowledge of Mosko hiding ill gotten gains. Tepfer may have info since they were former business associates. Pure speculation but it seems weird that Tepfer would try to get that much from someone who supposedly has none.
"Prosecutors say Moskowitz told the FBI in February 2017 that Weissman approached him and said Tepfer wanted $1 million or he would go to the authorities with incriminating information. The demand eventually rose to $7 million, according to the government."
So the FBI can direct resources toward a $7 million extortion attempt by insiders, but still haven't done anything about the $390 million stolen from shareholders by members of the SpongeTech Stock Distribution network who were not company insiders.
Thanks, dalessan!
Atty Cops Plea In Extortion Case Tied To Pump-And-Dump
By Stewart Bishop
Law360, New York (June 12, 2019, 8:34 PM EDT) -- A Long Island personal injury attorney on Wednesday admitted to taking part in what prosecutors say was a scheme by a convicted securities fraudster to try to extort $7 million from a former co-defendant and launder the funds through a religious charity.
At a morning hearing before U.S. District Judge Dora Irizarry in Brooklyn, Mark "Meyer" Weissman, 55, of Lawrence, New York, copped to conspiring to obstruct an official proceeding, namely, the enforcement of a $12.7 million restitution order against Weissman's friend Andrew Tepfer, who was convicted along with several others of a $21 million pump-and-dump scheme involving Spongetech Delivery Systems Inc.
Prosecutors say Tepfer enlisted Weissman, along with Queens rabbi Igal Haimoff, to aid him in a plot to shakedown former Spongetech Chief Financial Officer Steven Moskowitz. Tepfer used Weissman as a go-between to convey a threat to Moskowitz that Tepfer would go to the authorities with unspecified incriminating information if he wasn't paid as much as $7 million, according to the government.
"I'm sorry for getting involved in this at all," Weissman told Judge Irizarry. "It was wrong for me to seek to help a friend by violating the law."
Prosecutors and Weissman's lawyers estimate he's facing an advisory sentencing guidelines range of six to 12 months in prison. However, Judge Irizarry, who has final sentencing authority, wondered aloud whether a downward adjustment to the guidelines for playing a minor role was warranted and noted the lack of an upward adjustment for abuse of a position of trust.
Weissman waived his appeal rights as long as any term of imprisonment imposed is a year or less.
Prosecutors say Moskowitz told the FBI in February 2017 that Weissman approached him and said Tepfer wanted $1 million or he would go to the authorities with incriminating information. The demand eventually rose to $7 million, according to the government.
Moskowitz, who with Tepfer is jointly and severally liable for the $12.7 million in restitution from the pump-and-dump case, exchanged texts and had a series of recorded meetings and phone calls with Weissman in which they talked about how to transfer the money without it being diverted to satisfy the judgment.
Settling on a purported plan to have Moskowitz transfer the money through associates in Switzerland, Tepfer — who has pled not guilty — is said to have recruited rabbi Haimoff to funnel the cash through his charity, under the guise of a donation to fund the construction of a yeshiva.
As part of the alleged rouse, Weissman and Haimoff — who in February copped to money laundering conspiracy — crafted fake communications that were exchanged with Moskowitz's "Swiss" contact, who was actually an undercover FBI agent, according to the government.
An attorney for Weissman, Henry Mazurek, declined to comment after the plea hearing.
In a statement, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Richard P. Donoghue, said Weissman attempted to impede restitution for victims of a massive fraud.
"This office will vigorously prosecute corrupt attorneys who assist in violations of the law," Donoghue said.
Weissman is due to be sentenced on Nov. 4.
Tepfer dodged any prison time for the underlying Spongetech fraud case, but was ordered to be held jointly and severally liable for the $12.7 million restitution order. He is currently in custody for violating the terms of his bail in the current case, and potentially faces further penalties for violating his probation.
The government is represented by Nathan Reilly of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York.
Weissman is represented by Henry E. Mazurek and Evan Lipton of Meister Seelig & Fein LLP.
The case is U.S. v. Haimoff et al., case number 1:18-cr-00524, in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
--Additional reporting by Pete Brush. Editing by Michael Watanabe.
For a reprint of this article, please contact reprints@law360.com.
Read more at: https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/1168536?utm_source=shared-articles&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=shared-articles?copied=1
If you want to know about stale claims from the SPNG scam, contact Jay Booth who is the only one still tilting at the SPNG windmill.
Jay P Booth
195 Private LN #4436 Rhome, TX 76078
(940) 627-2128
You can use PACER to retrieve his numerous letters to various judges in various courts and such over the many years, to no avail whatsoever. PACER is free as long as you don't download more than $15 in searches and pages per quarter.
Or just ask Jay, he ought to be able to email them all to you, including his most recent failed FOIA request.
You won't be able to gett any munny of course, butt the reading is worth it for the laffs alone.
Or you can send a refund request to MINDY MOSKOWITZ - the CONtact info is in he iBox. You won't gett any munny there either, butt sometimes just sending a refund demand cam make one feel better about the loss.
If you want to know about stale claims from the SPNG scam, contact Jay Booth who is the only one still tilting at the SPNG windmill.
Jay P Booth
195 Private LN #4436 Rhome, TX 76078
(940) 627-2128
You can use PACER to retrieve his numerous letters to various judges in various courts and such over the many years, to no avail whatsoever. PACER is free as long as you don't download more than $15 in searches and pages per quarter.
Or just ask Jay, he ought to be able to email them all to you, including his most recent failed FOIA request.
You won't be able to gett any munny of course, butt the reading is worth it for the laffs alone.
Or you can send a refund request to MINDY MOSKOWITZ - the CONtact info is in he iBox. You won't gett any munny there either, butt sometimes just sending a refund demand cam make one feel better about the loss.
In a search for a contractor to replace my roof I had 5 estimates provided from 5 different companies. STEVEN MOSKOWITZ of Renovex LLC gave me the best price by over a couple thousand dollars. This was too good to pass on, so I hired Renovex to do the job.
Steve immediately demanded 60% of the cost to be paid upfront. I was hesitant so I told him once the material arrives on site I would give him the 60%. He rudely told me "I am not a bank, and I won't lay out that kind of money." We eventually came to an agreement. The following day, 80% of the material arrived and so I paid him in good faith. That was my second mistake. My first mistake was hiring him in the first place. I was initially promised that the entire job would be completed in 3-5 work days. Over the course of 3 weeks I've heard one excuse after the other. It went from bad weather (which never came) to family emergencies, to sick days (6 in a row, with no communication) This company left my roof unprotected which lead to a semi-major leak in multiple areas of my home. I am currently in the process of filing a claim against his insurance, which I'm beginning to think is fraudulent. I have gotten no where. After over three weeks from the start date they were only competent enough to complete 45% of the job. I had finally had enough of the excuses and contacted Steve. I told him I have no other recourse at this point. I need to hire someone else to complete the job. His response was, "Why didn't you tell me that my workers haven't been there in over 5 days? You are just trying to steal my materials and I will see you in court!" As if I'm responsible for managing his labor force. Save yourself the headache, don't use Renovex LLC for ANYTHING! It was a waste of my time and money in the long run. It was the least professional management I've ever dealt with in my entire life. PLEASE DON'T BE TEMPTED BY THE LOW COST, IT IS A FACADE THAT IS WELL WORTH AVOIDING!
Ross G. and 1 other voted for this review
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |