Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Brad the new CEO is the biggest liar ever, he keeps doing press releases on all the projects they have. They are out of business. Go to the CSLB,ca,gov look up Plemco and McKay roofing neither one of them are in business...He has destroyed this company. no license, workers comp or bond...DONE
And dullards like perennially-losing dealerfool. These dumbass jackholes are the wheat that feeds the pennyscammers.
Cherry we hardly knew ye.
Idiots like Cherry.
Shows you inflation is under control LOL
If you had $5,000 worth of this stock at the 52 week high, it is now worth 45 cents. What a POS stock and POS people who run this company into the ground!
What is a Schedule 13D report?
A Schedule 13D is a form that must be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when a person or group acquires more than 5% of a voting class of a company’s equity shares. This report, also known as a “beneficial ownership report,” serves to provide transparency regarding significant ownership stakes in publicly traded companies. Here are some key points about Schedule 13D:
Purpose: When an investor or entity acquires 5% or more of a company’s voting shares, they are required to report it to the SEC using Schedule 13D. The form helps disclose ownership changes and potential changes of control within the company.
Content: Schedule 13D requires the filer to provide information on several items, including:
Security and Issuer: Details about the type of securities purchased and the company’s name and address.
Identity and Background: Information about the buyers, such as their business type, citizenship, and any relevant legal history.
Source and Amount of Funds: Explanation of where the funds came from for the purchase.
Timing: The beneficial owner must file Schedule 13D within 10 days after acquiring the shares.
Transparency: By filing Schedule 13D, the public becomes aware of who holds a significant stake in the company and why. It helps investors make informed decisions and understand potential changes in control, such as hostile takeovers or proxy fights.
Remember that the obligation to file Schedule 13D lies with the new beneficial owner, as the target company may not initially know the person or group behind the transaction123.
Turn off the lights. This show is over.
It is the chicken without a head syndrome. It is dead, it just does not know it yet.
"If you chop the head off a chicken, it can still run around for a few seconds. The same applies to many other animals, including the turtle, which continues swimming even though its head has come off"
Down another 37% today. Time to put this this scam stock out of it's misery.
Another Nevada SOS filing today, just after 1pm. Does anyone know if that is for another R/S or A/S increase or what? In the filing classification description it reads "Amendment After Issuance of Stock."
Brett Rosen is in the SHIT LIST
SIRC is on it also.
https://1drv.ms/i/s!Ai4076i_L3wcqlOsetPO0hPoAMcb?e=qxl25s
Well, you must take into consideration the fact that SIRC is a scam.
These guys maxing out the AS looks like..stinky pinky
Hi creakyhottie,
I agree with you.
The only thing that bothered me was Brett saying that SIRC was a long way from being dept cleared.
He didn't mention anything about revenue for last year's fourth quarter.
But your right he did make it sound like a faint glitter of hopium.
He also thinks SIRC could do 30,000,000 million this year.
Stay in touch!
they no longer file financials. they submit reports to otcm. here is the last financial filed;
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=16213976&guid=JSd-k6jkCHwfJth
here is their last submission to otcm;
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/387089/content
Does anybody have a link to the last Financial they ever filed???
I just think we are a long way from the debt being cleared!
because he owns it?
Pembroke1
A faint glimmer of hopium:
Post
@BrettRosen325
I believe in $SIRC and I don’t feel the stock price is in any way reflective of the true value of the company. I expect that Brad will post $30m+ in revenue this fiscal year so once the debt is gone, this thing can fly again! I just think we are a long way from the debt being cleared!
8:15 AM · Mar 14, 2024
I believe in $SIRC and I don’t feel the stock price is in any way reflective of the true value of the company. I expect that Brad will post $30m+ in revenue this fiscal year so once the debt is gone, this thing can fly again! I just think we are a long way from the debt being…
— Brett Rosen (@BrettRosen325) March 14, 2024
do you remember the good old days of .0009?
Idiots like Cherry
Who is buying this at any price????? it's obviously a total and complete dilution scam!!!! who????
I understand why you never sold your shares.
You have no idea what's been going on here FOR YEARS despite it being explained clearly, & repeatedly.
I'll make you a deal - if you don't respond to this post or any more of my posts, I'll accord you the same courtesy.
I'm breaking up w/ you Pembroke, our relationship is kaput.
Please don't respond so we can call it quitsies.
Hey Dude,
There is no difference between a new share and an old Share that was converted.
They are worth the same price per share as the old shares after the split.
The shares are the same except for the conversion. So, a new share is equal to an old share.
after the split.
It was just a little information.
That has nothing to do with you.
Below is just your opinions and I do not need them !!
"STOP USING TODAY'S O/S to convert into the pre-split O/S from 6 weeks ago".
"Apples & Oranges".
Dude we already discussed this.
The 1:150 split resulted in around 25MM shares O/S.
THEN, AFTER THAT:
$SIRC apparently dumped 100s of millions of ADDITIONAL SHARES INTO THE O/S.
They needed to do this to cover all the convertibles - that's WHY they needed the R/S in the first place.
STOP USING TODAY'S O/S to convert into the pre-split O/S from 6 weeks ago.
Apples & Oranges.
you back, clown?
Maybe you didn't read my message. I thought it was pretty simple.
I said on SIRC"s Website it said as of 3/11/2024 that the outstanding Shares were 1,035,783,084.
If that is correct that would mean that their Outstanding Shares Pre-Split would equal 155,367,462,600?
Each new Common Share would equal 150 Shares like the Pre-Split shares were. That means that every new Share would be equal to 150 old Shares.
It doesn't mean anything I was just saying it.
.
I will say it again I used SIRC"s Website figures. I didn't say that the number was correct.
Also, I wasn't messaging you.
OTC Pink Current
Market Cap
$722,715
03/11/2024
Outstanding Shares
803,016,489
03/11/2024
You can contact the TA for pre split OS if you'd like, it's not always so simple to calculate yourself due to other factors
Revenue isn’t zero but it isn’t growing. Plemco sucks with their guaranteed date bs.
Hi creakyhottie,
I believe Post-Split Shares would be equal to 150 shares of Pre-Split Shares.
I was wondering if it was a world record.
Then I could call The Guinness Book of World Records.
I don't think we can sink much farther. I think we are under.
Stay in Touch !!
Pembroke1
Your math is impeccable.
However, I have no idea how many shares have been issued post split, or how many new convertibles have been issued since then (I would assume the potential converted shares would have to be included in o/s).
But in the end, at this point, it makes little difference. Can they ever make enough $$$ to make any E.P.S. number significant? We are basically in quicksand, the more you try to fight it, the faster you sink.
Hi creakyhottie,
On SIRC's Website SIRC says that their Outstanding Shares are 1,035,783,084 as of today.
If that is correct would that mean that their Outstanding Shares Pre-Split would equal 155,367,462,600?
I hate when a pr does not mention $$$ revenue estimate.
The only number I kept seeing was "Zero" LOL
Solar Integrated Roofing Corp. Announces Design Build System for Anderson Burton
SANTA ANA, Calif., March 11, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- PLEMCo, a subsidiary of Solar Integrated Roofing Corp. (OTC: SIRCD) ("SIRC" or "the Company") is excited to design and build a Net Zero Energy Solar Photovoltaic System for Anderson Burton as part of the USACE Lake Isabella Permanent Operations Buildings project at Lake Isabella, Kern County, California.
Bart Saunders, Director of Government Sales, believes "having Anderson Burton trust PLEMCo as their partner for this project is a great match for our capabilities. With our history of implementing renewable energy solutions on military sites, as well as our full turnkey inhouse capabilities, we see this as a win-win for both organizations and look forward for more close collaboration in the future."
Anderson Burton were looking for a trusted partner with military experience and solar installation expertise to meet the very specific requirements of this project for the US Army Corp of Engineers. The energy the solar component can deliver will be a valuable addition to the many other sustainable solutions included in the overall design of the site. Dan Carrisosa explained, "For renewable energy clients, one of the many focusses for us has been providing them with clean energy solutions. We at Anderson Burton are committed to helping meet their net zero goals and build a sustainable future for everyone."
In addition to the Design Build Project with Anderson Burton, PLEMCo was also recently awarded the installation of 10 EV chargers at Waco State Prison in Kern County, CA. The project is expected to start at the end of Q1 and will wrap up in early Q2.
About Anderson Burton
Anderson Burton is a full services Design Build and EPC General Contractor nationally recognized for safely delivering high quality, innovative solutions. We partner with clients from initial concept development all the way through to the completion of construction, delivering turnkey projects that meet their specifications for a guaranteed price and by a guaranteed date. We believe that being a good neighbor means protecting the environment and adjacent communities at our worldwide jobsites and supporting the communities where our employees live and work.
About PLEMCo
PLEMCo (est.2003) is charging toward clean energy solutions to control energy costs and reduce your carbon footprint. We are a provider of energy & water conservation and renewable energy design, consulting, and installation services to businesses of all sizes throughout the US. We are DoE-Qualified ESCo, in the CA-DGS ESCo pool, and a qualified FEMP-Enable provider. From simple energy efficiency to complex ESPCs are provided to both commercial and government clients.
About Solar Integrated Roofing Corp.
Solar Integrated Roofing Corp. (OTC: SIRCD) is an integrated, single-source solutions provider of solar power, roofing and EV charging systems, specializing in commercial and residential properties throughout North America. The Company serves communities by delivering the best experience through constant innovation & legacy-focused leadership. For more information, please visit the Company's Investor Relations website at www.solarintegratedroofing.com, Corporate website at https://www.sirc.com or join us on Twitter, LinkedIn or Facebook.
Press Release Contact:
Julie Brehm
jbrehm@sircfamily.com
Aren't these FLOORLESS financing Death Spirals just DaBeezeKnees?
Juan Tripps!! CHERRY,, this is yur BYE signal.
Cherry Bombed - bye before the next reverse split - which now can come as soon as FINRA can process it -which it might nott do.
Montlhly/weekly reverse splits coming?
Now down 99.99% from high price of the last 12 months. If you had $5,000 worth of this stock at the 52 week high, it is now worth 75 cents. The scam continues, how long before the next reverse split? That is just amazing, from $5,000. to 75 cents in less than a year!
Troy Clymer should be included in the litigation
If anybody wants to go after SIRC They would have to prove their allegations. I think the best way would be to use the information SIRC is using in the case against Dave Massy. But you would have to use it against SIRC the Company not Massey.
Try to get an Attorney to do it Pro-Bono
I assume that your attorney would somehow have get the backup information below.
SIRC will not help you because you are suing them.
SEE BELOW
Examining the Evidence: Massey’s Misconduct and Its Impact on SIRC
Now, we delve into the detailed specifics of David Massey’s tenure as CEO of SIRC. For shareholders, the following revelations may present a mix of emotions – from disbelief to frustration, perhaps tinged with a sense of the absurd. However, it’s important to approach these details with a clear perspective, recognizing the gravity and potential impact of these allegations on the company. Be prepared; some of the information may be unsettling, reflecting a challenging period in SIRC’s history.
Lying to the Board | Securities Fraud: Massey, despite receiving adequate compensation as CEO of SIRC, a microcap company, in 2020 to the tune of $92,077.60 (Exhibit 1), misrepresented his compensation status to SIRC’s Board of Directors. He claimed he had never been compensated, which led to the issuance of 5 million Preferred B shares to him (Exhibit 2). Each of these shares was convertible into 10 common shares. Given that the stock was trading at $0.03 per share at the time, this act of securities fraud effectively amounted to a theft of $1.5 million from the company.
More Theft: Once again, the Board was deceived by Massey, resulting in the issuance of more Class B shares under the pretext of “compensation.” On June 17, 2020, a decision was made to issue an additional 1.5 million Class B shares to Massey, purportedly as compensation (Exhibit 3). This grant allowed Massey to obtain another 15 million common shares, valued at roughly $750,000.00, based on the then-current stock price of about $0.05 per share. This act, constituting a substantial financial gain under false pretenses, amounted to further theft from the company. The basis of these transactions – claiming compensation that was already paid – violated the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, specifically 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b). Moreover, credible indications suggest that Massey likely did not accurately report these transactions and his actual compensation on his tax returns, potentially constituting attempts to defraud the United States government in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371.
And the Buyback Scheme: Massey’s maneuvers extended to an attempt to persuade the Board to repurchase his Preferred B shares for a staggering $10,000,000.00. This ambitious proposal, however, was ultimately declined by the Board (Exhibit 4). Yet, persisting in his claim of non-payment – despite evidence to the contrary – Massey was partially successful. As revealed in Exhibit 4, he managed to convince the Board to buy back 1 million of these shares, this time for $2,000,000.00. This transaction, carried out under the guise of unpaid compensation, further demonstrates the pattern of deceptive practices employed by Massey during his tenure.
Off-The-Books Transfers | “SIRC, LLC”: Massey established “SIRC, LLC,” a shell company for off-the-books transfers, on June 7, 2021, potentially to facilitate the conversion of his Preferred B shares into cash. He chose Indiana for registration to maintain a low profile (Exhibit 5).
“SIRC, LLC” Continued: The Articles of Incorporation for “SIRC, LLC” name James Smyth, Esq. as the registered agent, linked to “customstructuredsettlements.com.” Mr. Smyth is also the managing partner of Custom Structured Settlements LLC, which helps in “strategically defer[ring] capital gains when allowed by law” (Exhibit 6; Exhibit 7).
Clearly a Shell Company for No Good Purpose: The dissolution of SIRC, LLC on December 5, 2023, following SIRC’s announcement of legal action against Massey, suggests its role in facilitating Massey’s personal enrichment (Exhibit 8).
Selling Restricted Shares to “SIRC, LLC”: Massey first sold 1 million Preferred B shares to Pablo Diaz on February 7, 2022. He then transferred the remaining 4.5 million restricted shares to “SIRC, LLC” on May 25, 2022, aiming for clandestine profit without having to report the transactions since, on paper, “SIRC, LLC” was a third party (Exhibit 9).
Restrictions | FBI Freeze: Eventually, Massey learned that he could not easily sell shares that were still restricted. So, under “SIRC, LLC,” he transferred 37 million common shares (equivalent to 3.7 million Preferred B shares post-conversion) back to himself on October 5, 2022 (Exhibit 10). On November 3, 2022, he pushed to have all restrictions removed from these shares, aiming to facilitate their transfer back to “SIRC, LLC” and subsequent off-the-books sale (Exhibit 11). However, the broker correctly rejected the removal attempt due to a microcap policy (Exhibit 12). Undaunted, Massey tried again on January 20, 2023, this time for a partial removal of restrictions on 6,258,986 shares (Exhibit 13). Although successful, this action constituted a clear securities violation. Consequently, on August 25, 2023, the FBI intervened and seized these assets (Exhibit 14).
Reckless Mismanagement:
Arbiter. Lending $4.2 million to receive a subsequent loan of $42 million is inherently questionable, yet this was Massey’s plan with Arbiter Capital LLC (“Arbiter USA”), a Delaware LLC. On October 5, 2021, under Massey’s direction, SIRC loaned $4.2 million to Arbiter USA at 3.5% interest (Exhibit 15). This was to finance Arbiter USA’s non-operational subsidiary, Arbiter Bank International (St. Lucia) Limited (“Arbiter St. Lucia”), purportedly enabling a $42 million loan to SIRC (Exhibit 16; Exhibit 17). However, SIRC has yet to receive any return from this transaction. The glaring inconsistency in Massey’s plan was failing to question the rationale behind Arbiter needing a $4.2 million loan from SIRC when it was supposedly positioned to lend $42 million.
Balance Sheet Errors. The lack of oversight from Massey over the accounting department led to significant discrepancies in the company’s balance sheet. In 2021, these errors resulted in discrepancies amounting to at least $84,000.00, underscoring a concerning lack of financial diligence (Exhibit 18).
Toxic Debts. Contrary to his fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of SIRC, Massey repeatedly engaged the company in financially hazardous obligations. A striking example of this is a loan secured on September 9, 2020, burdening SIRC with an exorbitant annual percentage rate of 88.25% (Exhibit 19), an action indicative of gross financial mismanagement.
Lack of Due Diligence & Regulatory Noncompliance. Massey’s tenure at SIRC was marked by a consistent disregard for due diligence, leading to transactions that were not only risky but also in violation of regulatory standards. A prominent example is SIRC’s dealings with Jefferson Street Capital LLC (JSC), a firm that claimed to be a securities trader. Massey failed to verify JSC’s registration status as a dealer, thus breaching the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, when he entered SIRC into a precarious Securities Purchase Agreement on March 19, 2019 (Exhibit 20). This lack of oversight resulted in a considerable financial setback for SIRC. JSC executed a conversion at a significantly lower rate of $0.05 per share when SIRC’s stock was trading well above $0.50 around June 2021, as detailed in Exhibit 20 (paragraph 1.2) and further supported by Exhibit 21. Massey himself admitted this failure as a result of his “ignorance” (Exhibit 21).
Lack of Due Diligence in Hiring & Acquisitions. Massey’s legendary lack of due diligence was not confined to securities. With exacting efficiency, he made sure to entrench SIRC in costly deals when acquiring businesses and hiring insiders. For instance, he purchased a 60% interest in SunUp Solar LLC (“SunUp”) from its owner, Elijah Chaffino, for $200,000 plus 200,000 shares of common stock on June 30, 2021, despite SunUp having “no tangible assets” and being operational for less than a year since October 26, 2020 (Exhibit 22 at ¶ 1.02(b); Exhibit 23 at p. 34). Furthermore, Massey’s decision to appoint Mr. Chaffino to manage SIRC’s Milholland subsidiary resulted in a conflict of interest, given Chaffino’s ownership in Standard Eco LLC, a subcontractor for SIRC. This arrangement led to Chaffino’s resignation on August 22, 2022, followed by a lawsuit against SIRC on November 22, 2023. This entire transaction not only incurred the initial purchase cost but also resulted in $2.9 million in operational losses from SunUp, as well as additional legal fees, significantly impacting SIRC’s financial standing.
More Regulatory Noncompliance. Massey’s disregard for SEC rules extended into his personal dealings, particularly evident in a late 2021 off-the-books transaction with Granite Ridge Capital Partners (“Granite”). Lacking any record at SIRC, it’s presumed this was a private deal between Massey and Granite. However, like the Jefferson Street Capital case, Granite wasn’t a registered dealer, making this transaction a violation of securities laws. Complicating matters, Massey used SIRC’s resources for legal defense when issues arose, incurring personal legal expenses on the company (Exhibit 24).
Impressing Girlfriend at the Expense of Investors. Mr. Massey, ever creative, had found other ways to contribute to SIRC’s decline. Notably, he re-hired his girlfriend’s daughter, Christina Johnson, despite her previous employment and subsequent lawsuit against SIRC. Her ineffectiveness was highlighted in a June 29, 2018 email advising Massey on how to “spin” company mishaps (Exhibit 25). Beyond prompting questionable actions from Massey, Johnson’s tenure was largely unproductive, filled with complaints and accusations. After her initial lawsuit and subsequent rehiring, Johnson mercifully quit after just three months. Astonishingly, Massey then rewarded her with a three-year severance package. This decision, aimed more at impressing his girlfriend than serving SIRC’s best interests, represented a clear breach of Massey’s fiduciary duty.
Impressing Girlfriend, Continued. In January 2022, Massey contemplated using SIRC funds to acquire Heartland Constructors LLC, a defunct Texas company owned by Bob Zarbo (Exhibit 26). An email dated August 27, 2022, revealed the purchase was primarily intended to benefit Massey’s girlfriend, “Marlena’s Comp plan,” by appointing her as President and minority owner (Exhibit 27). Although this purchase never materialized, it exemplifies Massey’s tendency to prioritize personal interests over SIRC’s well-being, potentially leading to further financial detriment for the company.
More Clueless Projections. Adding to the Arbiter debacle, Massey’s February 2023 prediction that Arbiter St. Lucia would be funded within a month proves to be another example of his imprudent management (Exhibit 28). As of December 2023, two years post SIRC’s $4.2 million loan to Arbiter USA, Arbiter St. Lucia remains without even a SWIFT code, highlighting a continuous pattern of reckless executive decisions.
Using the SIRC Treasury for Personal Expenditures. Massey routinely diverted SIRC funds for his own expenses without board approval. Among numerous instances, notable examples include using company funds to cover his personal legal fees (Exhibit 24), payments related to his personal real estate investments (Exhibit 29), and costs associated with a trailer he owned (Exhibit 30). These actions, just a fraction of many, not only constitute fraud and breach of fiduciary duty but have also resulted in significant financial harm to SIRC.
Gambling with SIRC Funds. A particularly striking misuse of funds occurred on February 7, 2022, when Massey traded 1 million of his Preferred B shares with Pablo Diaz for just $1,000.00 (Exhibit 31). This transaction, seemingly personal but related to Diaz’s insider status at SIRC, undervalued the shares significantly, given their conversion potential to 10 million common shares and the stock’s trading price above $0.30 at the time. This deal, not representing true value, effectively gambled SIRC’s assets, with Massey using the proceeds for a sports bet (Exhibit 32).
Illegal Communications with (and Lies to) Investors: Massey regularly misled investors with false insider information, unbeknownst to SIRC management. He once told a retail investor, on March 16, 2023, that the share price would reach $0.20 within the next 30 days, a claim which proved to be unfounded as the share price later plummeted (Exhibit 33). He also used SIRC funds for a hotel booking on November 9, 2020, to meet another investor and provide misleading information (Exhibit 34).
Sam Aker: Massey also provided insider information to the popular investment journalist Sam Aker, under the pretense of official communications. On February 13, 2023, Massey falsely claimed to have secured funding for SIRC and misrepresented the reasons behind other executives’ departures, disregarding Mr. Aker’s specific request for only public information (Exhibit 35). Upholding his professional ethics, Mr. Aker unequivocally instructed Massey not to provide any insider information (Exhibit 35). He even forwarded SIRC’s short selling report to Mr. Aker before public release, again, after being advised against such insider communications (Exhibit 36).
Massey Told to Stop: Once discovered, SIRC insiders directed Massey to cease these unauthorized activities. On December 15, 2022, CEO George Holmes explicitly instructed him to refrain from responding to shareholder emails, a directive Massey repeatedly ignored (Exhibit 37).
Completely Rogue: Further evidence of Massey’s rogue behavior includes his admissions to an investor on March 19, 2023, and November 11, 2022, about being advised against shareholder communications, yet continuing to do so (Exhibit 38). He even forwarded an internal SIRC email to Mr. Aker on April 2, 2023, despite clear instructions to stop (Exhibit 39). Massey’s actions not only breached fiduciary duty and violated securities laws but also inflicted significant damage to SIRC’s goodwill and finances.
PPP Loan Scandal: Massey colluded with Ms. Mettias to defraud the U.S. government by manipulating Small Business Administration loans under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). Opting for Mettias as a consultant, despite her exorbitant fee of over $500,000 (based on 10% of loan proceeds) compared to the standard $50,000, they conspired to use portions of these loans for personal expenses (Exhibit 40). Further, they inflated SIRC’s employee numbers on PPP applications, claiming over 500 employees despite actual numbers being significantly lower, to obtain more funds (Exhibit 41).
In the End, He Tried to Run: Following his resignation, Massey continued his attempts to undermine SIRC. He pressured the new CEO, Brad Rinehart, to declare bankruptcy, likely to evade his own debts and obligations from his time at SIRC. Mr. Rinehart, however, stood firm against these suggestions, demonstrating his integrity in the face of such pressure (Exhibit 42).
Damages: SIRC suffered substantial damages due to the alleged actions of Massey and other defendants, including securities violations, wire fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, negligence, conversion, unjust enrichment, RICO violations, and conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government. These damages encompass funds misappropriated by Massey and Mettias, Massey’s personal expenditures from SIRC funds, losses due to his reckless management, and the associated legal costs. Additionally, SIRC’s reputation among investors has been significantly damaged, evident in the over $100 million decrease in market capitalization. The egregious nature of these actions, characterized by deliberate and reckless disregard for SIRC’s wellbeing, justifies seeking punitive damages in the amount of 10 times the compensatory damages. Therefore, SIRC is pursuing a total jury verdict of $1.1 billion against Massey and Mettias, reflecting both compensatory and punitive damages.
Conclusion
The legal battle against Massey, Mettias, and other associated defendants reveals a deeply troubling narrative within Solar Integrated Roofing Corp. (SIRC). The allegations, ranging from reckless mismanagement to outright fraud, paint a picture of a company severely impacted by the actions of a few individuals. The lawsuit lays bare the extent to which SIRC suffered — financially, reputationally, and operationally.
While the monetary damages sought in the lawsuit are substantial, they reflect more than just financial loss. They symbolize the effort to rectify the wrongs done to SIRC, its shareholders, and its stakeholders. This case stands as a stark reminder of the importance of ethical leadership and the consequences when it is lacking.
I hope everbuddy is enjoying the FLOORLESS financing Death Spiral.
Followers
|
395
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
37836
|
Created
|
11/04/09
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators price_and_volume |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |