Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Well, I couldn't believe my eyes reading something I've been preaching here day after day. The India Bar Association in its Complaint states this at p.26/132
"The Scientists: The two most famous medical journals in the world
were caught red-handed publishing fraud. The sheer number and
magnitude of the things that went wrong or missing in their 1 studies
were too enormous to attribute to mere incompetence. The data upon
which these studies were based were so ridiculously erroneous that it
only took two weeks for an eagle-eyed physician to publicly demand an
explanation.In pursuing a fraudulent 2 headline maligning HCQ, the
third most famous medical journal in the world, Journal of the
American Medical Association (JAMA), literally printed evidence of a
crime.[/b] 3 4
That's not me saying both FRAUD and CRIMINAL as to what was done, this statement was the statement of approximately a million or so lawyers. I join this group and keep proclaiming the Lancet FRAUD and its criminal implications set up a situation based on FRAUD to deny people the use of therapeutics and as a result, needlessly died. Yes Criminal in India and criminal in the USA.
You can find the Complaint in this link under Tab Covid 19 and select Legal, you'll see Complaint in the list:
https://indianbarassociation.in/
Ok. This is eye opening. I believe Ivermectin use has been politicized like many other aspects around this pandemic. This was in The British Medical Journal and gives legitimacy to several groups I knew nothing about. I try to be aware of Confirmation Bias so I question sources when they tell me what I want to hear.
Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) Panel
https://bird-group.org/
This is the article that prompted this post.
The BOLD below was mine.
https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n747/rr-12
Rapid Response:
Re: Covid-19: Ivermectin’s politicisation is a warning sign for doctors turning to orphan treatments
Dear Editor
Zoonotic diseases are on the rise due to exponential rise in the global population causing man to encroach on new ecological habitats in search of space, food, and resources as well as improved opportunities for rampant wildlife trade causing inter-species virus jumps. The fact that the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus has been thought to have originated from wildlife and may have “jumped” into humans, not only highlights future risks from animal-borne diseases but also provides an important clue to its resolution.
In unusual times likes these, when the world is battling with a virus, drug repurposing can be possible solution to avoid needless deaths. It is concerning that few drugs (Remdesivir, tocilizumab) were given emergency approval for use against COVID-19 without adequate trials on their safety profiles, Ivermectin, on the other hand has been withheld in spite of 35 years of favorable pharmacovigilance records, and many well designed Randomized controlled trials on its efficacy. [1]
Secondly, recent studies have shown Vitamin D to play a role in COVID-19 and to call it an "orphan treatment" would be incorrect. [2]
The hospitals are overwhelmed and the doctors are overworked. They depend on health authorities to carry out meta-analyses and come up with guidelines that need to be followed. In the present circumstances, what seems unusual is the focussed intentional systematic suppression, forbidding and censoring of a cheap, widely available, life-saving therapeutic, Ivermectin, in the middle of a pandemic.
There have been various groups that are creating awareness around Ivermectin for COVID-19, including the frontline covid-19 critical care alliance [3] created by highly published critical care specialists from major academic medical centers and the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) Panel headed by Dr Tess Lawrie. The BIRD is an evidence based consultancy collaboration of 75 researchers, specialists, patient representatives [4] that follow the W.H.O “evidence to decision framework” to conduct metanalyses and systematic reviews of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT) of Ivermectin on COVID-19. As per this group, Ivermectin is recommended strongly for all phases of COVID-19.
A Review Article: Global trends in clinical studies of ivermectin in COVID-19 published in March 2021 in The Japanese Jpurnal of Antibiotics has been co-authored by Dr. Satoshi Omura. In the article they have described the benefits of ivermectin in COVID-19 as: " Ivermectin may even turn out to be comparable to the benefits achieved from the discovery of penicillin—said to be one of the greatest discoveries of the twentieth century. Here, one more use for ivermectin, which has been described as “miracle” or “wonder” drug, is being added. History has demonstrated that the existence of such natural product-derived compounds with such diverse effects is exceedingly rare. " [5]
Satoshi Omura is known for the discovery and development of various pharmaceuticals originally occurring in microorganisms. He was awarded the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine jointly with William C. Campbell and Tu Youyou for discoveries concerning a novel therapy against infections caused by roundworm parasites. More precisely, his research group isolated a strain of Streptomyces avermitilis that produce the anti-parasitical compound avermectin. This lead to the discovery of ivermectin. [6]
In the end, we need to also realise that Ivermectin is not a replacement to social distancing, masks and personal protection equipment. To achieve post-pandemic phase globally, large scale vaccination programmes have already begun in full swing all over the world. The vaccines are developed keeping the S proteins in mind, i.e they are virus-directed, and some "vaccine escape strains " have been a cause of worry. [7] Ivermectin, on the other hand, targets the virus as well as the host and could work on these strains as well. [8]
While several countries and some sections of the population need to wait for their turn to get vaccinated, Ivermectin could act as a safety bridge, in saving human lives, while we get there.
Very good point, thanks for being so aware.
Not enough studies done. But all the studies for the vaccine are deferred and will not be complete for a few more years, but that doesn't matter.
Rules for thee but not for me.
Court's intervene on behalf of hospitalized patients to use either hydroxy or ivermectin
https://yated.com/right-to-try-wins-in-court-again/
The above article has a good compilation of court's intervening for treatment either w/hydroxy or ivermectin with v. good results
HOWEVER, NOTE THIS REPORTING IS FROM OBSCURE SITES NO MAINSTREAM, ONLY MAINSTREAM WAS BUFFALO NEWS BUT THAT'S LOCAL NOT NATIONAL. NOT TV, RADIO, SOCIAL MEDIA COVERAGE. TOTALLY SUPPRESSED.
https://buffalonews.com/news/local/2nd-wny-hospital-ordered-to-treat-covid-19-patient-with-experimental-drug/article_f32339f0-5d01-11eb-b752-4f8966804581.html
https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-court-orders-ny-hospital-to-administer-ivermectin-to-covid-patient-who-began-breathing-on-his-own-after-one-dose
https://www.legitgov.org/new-york-supreme-court-judge-saves-80-year-old-patient-death-ordering-hospital-give-life-saving
https://trialsitenews.com/beyond-the-roundup-another-ny-judge-orders-a-hospital-to-use-ivermectin/
There are too many rules for thee but not for me going on to take any of it seriously. Lolapalooza is ok. Sturgis is not. Restrict travel but open the southern border. BLM riots ok, going to church is bad. and on and on . . .
And they wonder why trust in the media and the government is so low.
Yep...you would think.. I'm far from a conspiracist but too many things are happening in the world right now that just doesn't make sense. Seems like every day something new comes along and I'm like...WTF.
That sucks. What I cannot understand is why antibody test for those who have already had it would not be accepted as well as the jab? Your immune system is probably a better defense against it now than the jab.
Hard to know what to believe anymore. I stay away from newspapers, TV, and the far left/right sites. Get most of my info on data coming out of the UK or Israel.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1012644/Technical_Briefing_21.pdf
I had Covid back in February. All of my kids got it at the same time although they don't live at home anymore. My daughter was 6 months pregnant at the time and had a little case of pneumonia that lasted for about a week. She also was the only one to get the shot because it was mandated by her school district and has had heart issues since. She's probably going to lose her job because she won't get the 2nd shot. My wife is 6 months from retirement and she won't get jabbed so I'm expecting her to also lose her job before she's eligible to retire. My son has already lost his federal job because he won't get it. I'm sure every family has a story to tell and most are much worse then mine. I just know that the vaccine isn't for everyone and I hate that they keep pushing it down our throats. The more they push they less likely I'll ever get it.
I keep reading about India but most of the stories always have the "unproven" or "not enough data" framing thrown in.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2021/05/11/indian-state-will-offer-ivermectin-to-entire-adult-population---even-as-who-warns-against-its-use-as-covid-19-treatment/?sh=3904125f6d9f
There is this,
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/epidemiologic-analyses-on-covid19-and-ivermectin/
I have no way to know if it is factual, but if it is I get why India is using it. Its cheap, available and known to be safe. If ibuprofen had lots of anecdotal evidence that it worked, why not take it?
I have been taking vitamin C, D and Zinc through this. there is no evidence that it works to prevent COVID infection but it works well against other viruses. I have had close contact 6 times where I had to go get tested for work. One incident was travelling. I was with three other guys for 4 days and had one vehicle. 2 of us got the beer bug and two of us didn't. Did my C,D and zinc prevent me from getting infected? Maybe. maybe not. But it is cheap and harmless at worst. I suspect harmless would be the worst case for Ivermectin as well.
Will be interesting to see how this plays out. Tokyo showing interest in ivermectin too.
Tokyo Metropolitan Medical Association recommends ivermectin administration to prevent aggravation.
https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOFB25AAL0V20C21A1000000/
Ivermectin trial underway.
https://www.principletrial.org/news/ivermectin-to-be-investigated-as-a-possible-treatment-for-covid-19-in-oxford2019s-principle-trial
results will be here
https://www.principletrial.org/results
TRUMP’S CHABAD LUBAVITCH DOCTOR - 90% OF THE VAXXED WILL DIE
WATCH
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Zj1rVpxnMDeS/
THEY'RE PUTTING GRAPHENE IN THE VAXXINE TO MAKE PEOPLE SICK & KILL THEM' (QUINTA COLUMNA 21.08.19)
WATCH
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vwfGUq6fevBo/
Stew Peters – Metals In Vaxx? - VIEEO
https://robertdavidsteele.com/stew-peters-metals-in-vaxx/
by Shermann thanks
Per Smiiter's board:
Japan just halted Moderna after finding a foreign Particle in it.
by Smiter thanks
Dr. Sean Brooks Warns Vaccinated Will Die Soon
Must-Watch!
https://www.infowars.com/posts/must-watch-dr-sean-brooks-warns-vaccinated-will-die-soon/
“Once again mainstream media has lied to you. I’m sorry to say that,
I know it’s a shock to this viewership, but the product that’s licensed
is the BioNtech product, which is substantially similar but not
necessarily identical, It’s called Comirnaty…”
by Garden Rose thanks....
https://needtoknow.news/2021/08/inventor-of-mrna-vaccine-says-fda-did-not-approve-the-pfizer-vaccine-but-approved-a-different-vaccine-instead/
Japan just halted Moderna after finding a foreign Particle in it.
Take a look at these White Supremecists rallying for masks for all but them. Try to find a black, brown or Asian person? They really should be on the terrorist list.
https://nypost.com/2021/08/22/video-shows-hoards-of-maskless-people-at-pelosi-fundraiser/
Why does the FDA really work for big pharma?
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/083/083/753/original/1c5710d007999a36.png
Keep in mind, if they can put out a mandate for a 99+% survivability rate, they can put out mandates for other things:
Yearly flu mandated
Yearly physical for certain illnsesses that are affecting the public good.
Mandate drugs for gambling addiction, drug addiction (yep there are such drugs) because those "people affect" the whole of society at great cost.
The big Kahuna GUNS, GUNS, GUNS, must be mandated out of existence for them to succeed in total tyrannical control of YOU. Here's the first step, I believe the current admin is trying to desginate gun violence under the CDC a public health issue.
Now, that's an easy peasy, see where this is going?????? First we call it a "public health issue", then you get all those 1200 doctors who said all the violence during Geo Floyd summer was no problem as a superspreader, but peaceful gatherings were superspreaders. See? When you have criminals like that you get the gun public health issue transformed into a public health CRISIS! Now they hit the jackpot, health crises MUST BE CONTROLLED!!!
Guns will first be "controlled", then eliminated.
Repeat: Look at Australia, keep looking behind your back, they want your guns and are preparing the groundwork right now.
It Finally Peaked: The Delta Of Delta Turns Negative
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/it-finally-peaked-delta-delta-turns-negative
New prediction: frenzy to discredit both hydroxy and Ivermectin since they want no competition with the planned "endless" rollout of Boosters.
Vax Freaks in panic mode, people are more informed, bigger and greater fear push, vax push, more crazy and more crazy. Watch it unfold.
“Once again mainstream media has lied to you. I’m sorry to say that, I know it’s a shock to this viewership, but the product that’s licensed is the BioNtech product, which is substantially similar but not necessarily identical, It’s called Comirnaty…”
https://needtoknow.news/2021/08/inventor-of-mrna-vaccine-says-fda-did-not-approve-the-pfizer-vaccine-but-approved-a-different-vaccine-instead/
Regarding the "RUSHED" approval.
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/08/23/does-the-fda-think-these-data-justify-the-first-full-approval-of-a-covid-19-vaccine/
https://youtu.be/ELq3y1D8-rg
Does the FDA think these data justify the first full approval of a covid-19 vaccine?
August 23, 2021
The FDA should demand adequate, controlled studies with long term follow up, and make data publicly available, before granting full approval to covid-19 vaccines, says Peter Doshi
On 28 July 2021, Pfizer and BioNTech posted updated results for their ongoing phase 3 covid-19 vaccine trial. The preprint came almost a year to the day after the historical trial commenced, and nearly four months since the companies announced vaccine efficacy estimates “up to six months.”
But you won’t find 10 month follow-up data here. While the preprint is new, the results it contains aren’t particularly up to date. In fact, the paper is based on the same data cut-off date (13 March 2021) as the 1 April press release, and its topline efficacy result is identical: 91.3% (95% CI 89.0 to 93.2) vaccine efficacy against symptomatic covid-19 through “up to six months of follow-up.”
The 20 page preprint matters because it represents the most detailed public account of the pivotal trial data Pfizer submitted in pursuit of the world’s first “full approval” of a coronavirus vaccine from the Food and Drug Administration. It deserves careful scrutiny.
The elephant named “waning immunity”
Since late last year, we’ve heard that Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccines are “95% effective” with even greater efficacy against severe disease (“100% effective,” Moderna said).
Whatever one thinks about the “95% effective” claims (my thoughts are here), even the most enthusiastic commentators have acknowledged that measuring vaccine efficacy two months after dosing says little about just how long vaccine-induced immunity will last. “We’re going to be looking very intently at the durability of protection,” Pfizer senior vice president William Gruber, an author on the recent preprint, told the FDA’s advisory committee last December.
The concern, of course, was decreased efficacy over time. “Waning immunity” is a known problem for influenza vaccines, with some studies showing near zero effectiveness after just three months, meaning a vaccine taken early may ultimately provide no protection by the time “flu season” arrives some months later. If vaccine efficacy wanes over time, the crucial question becomes what level of effectiveness will the vaccine provide when a person is actually exposed to the virus? Unlike covid vaccines, influenza vaccine performance has always been judged over a full season, not a couple months.
And so the recent reports from Israel’s Ministry of Health caught my eye. In early July, they reported that efficacy against infection and symptomatic disease “fell to 64%.” By late July it had fallen to 39% where Delta is the dominant strain. This is very low. For context, the FDA’s expectation is of “at least 50%” efficacy for any approvable vaccine.
Now Israel, which almost exclusively used Pfizer vaccine, has begun administering a third “booster” dose to all adults over 40. And starting 20 September 2021, the US plans to follow suit for all “fully vaccinated” adults eight months past their second dose.
Delta may not be responsible
Enter Pfizer’s preprint. As an RCT reporting “up to six months of follow-up,” it is notable that evidence of waning immunity was already visible in the data by the 13 March 2021 data cut-off.
“From its peak post-dose 2,” the study authors write, “observed VE [vaccine efficacy] declined.” From 96% to 90% (from two months to <4 months), then to 84% (95% CI 75 to 90) “from four months to the data cut-off,” which, by my calculation (see footnote at the end of the piece), was about one month later.
But although this additional information was available to Pfizer in April, it was not published until the end of July.
And it’s hard to imagine how the Delta variant could play a real role here, for 77% of trial participants were from the United States, where Delta was not established until months after data cut-off.
Waning efficacy has the potential to be far more than a minor inconvenience; it can dramatically change the risk-benefit calculus. And whatever its cause—intrinsic properties of the vaccine, the circulation of new variants, some combination of the two, or something else—the bottom line is that vaccines need to be effective.
Until new clinical trials demonstrate that boosters increase efficacy above 50%, without increasing serious adverse events, it is unclear whether the 2-dose series would even meet the FDA’s approval standard at six or nine months.
The “six month” preprint based on the 7% of trial participants who remained blinded at six months
The final efficacy timepoint reported in Pfizer’s preprint is “from four months to the data cut-off.” The confidence interval here is wider than earlier time points because only half of trial participants (53%) made it to the four month mark, and mean follow-up is around 4.4 months (see footnote).
This all happened because starting last December, Pfizer allowed all trial participants to be formally unblinded, and placebo recipients to get vaccinated. By 13 March 2021 (data cut-off), 93% of trial participants (41,128 of 44,060; Fig 1) were unblinded, officially entering “open-label followup.” (Ditto for Moderna: by mid April, 98% of placebo recipients had been vaccinated.)
Despite the reference to “six month safety and efficacy” in the preprint’s title, the paper only reports on vaccine efficacy “up to six months,” but not from six months. This is not semantics, as it turns out only 7% of trial participants actually reached six months of blinded follow-up (“8% of BNT162b2 recipients and 6% of placebo recipients had ≥6 months follow-up post-dose 2.”) So despite this preprint appearing a year after the trial began, it provides no data on vaccine efficacy past six months, which is the period Israel says vaccine efficacy has dropped to 39%.
It is hard to imagine that the <10% of trial participants who remained blinded at six months (which presumably further dwindled after 13 March 2021) could constitute a reliable or valid sample to produce further findings. And the preprint does not report any demographic comparisons to justify future analyses.
Severe disease
With the US awash in news about rising cases of the Delta variant, including among the “fully vaccinated,” the vaccine’s efficacy profile is in question. But some medical commentators are delivering an upbeat message. Former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb, who is on Pfizer’s board, said: “Remember, the original premise behind these vaccines were [sic] that they would substantially reduce the risk of death and severe disease and hospitalization. And that was the data that came out of the initial clinical trials.”
Yet, the trials were not designed to study severe disease. In the data that supported Pfizer’s EUA, the company itself characterized the “severe covid-19” endpoint results as “preliminary evidence.” Hospital admission numbers were not reported, and zero covid-19 deaths occurred.
In the preprint, high efficacy against “severe covid-19” is reported based on all follow-up time (one event in the vaccinated group vs 30 in placebo), but the number of hospital admissions is not reported so we don’t know which, if any, of these patients were ill enough to require hospital treatment. (In Moderna’s trial, data last year showed that 21 of 30 “severe covid-19” cases were not admitted to hospital; Table S14).
And on preventing death from covid-19, there are too few data to draw conclusions—a total of three covid-19 related deaths (one on vaccine, two on placebo). There were 29 total deaths during blinded follow-up (15 in the vaccine arm; 14 in placebo).
The crucial question, however, is whether the waning efficacy seen in the primary endpoint data also applies to the vaccine’s efficacy against severe disease. Unfortunately, Pfizer’s new preprint does not report the results in a way that allows for evaluating this question.
Approval imminent without data transparency, or even an advisory committee meeting?
Last December, with limited data, the FDA granted Pfizer’s vaccine an EUA, enabling access to all Americans who wanted one. It sent a clear message that the FDA could both address the enormous demand for vaccines without compromising on the science. A “full approval” could remain a high bar.
But here we are, with FDA reportedly on the verge of granting a marketing license 13 months into the still ongoing, two year pivotal trial, with no reported data past 13 March 2021, unclear efficacy after six months due to unblinding, evidence of waning protection irrespective of the Delta variant, and limited reporting of safety data. (The preprint reports “decreased appetite, lethargy, asthenia, malaise, night sweats, and hyperhidrosis were new adverse events attributable to BNT162b2 not previously identified in earlier reports,” but provides no data tables showing the frequency of these, or other, adverse events.)
It’s not helping matters that FDA now says it won’t convene its advisory committee to discuss the data ahead of approving Pfizer’s vaccine. (Last August, to address vaccine hesitancy, the agency had “committed to use an advisory committee composed of independent experts to ensure deliberations about authorization or licensure are transparent for the public.”)
Prior to the preprint, my view, along with a group of around 30 clinicians, scientists, and patient advocates, was that there were simply too many open questions about all covid-19 vaccines to support approving any this year. The preprint has, unfortunately, addressed very few of those open questions, and has raised some new ones.
I reiterate our call: “slow down and get the science right—there is no legitimate reason to hurry to grant a license to a coronavirus vaccine.”
FDA should be demanding that the companies complete the two year follow-up, as originally planned (even without a placebo group, much can still be learned about safety). They should demand adequate, controlled studies using patient outcomes in the now substantial population of people who have recovered from covid. And regulators should bolster public trust by helping ensure that everyone can access the underlying data.
Peter Doshi, senior editor, The BMJ.
Competing interests: I helped organize the Coalition Advocating for Adequately Licensed Medicines (CAALM), which has formally petitioned the FDA to refrain from fully approving any covid-19 vaccine this year (docket FDA-2021-P-0786). A full list of competing interests is available here.
Provenance: commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.
Footnote: Calculations in this article are as follows. “About 1 month” past month 4 is based on the final row of Fig 2 in the preprint: 1030/12670*12 = 0.98 months (vaccine group) and 895/11802*12 = 0.91 months (placebo group). “53%” is based on Fig 2: (12670+11802)/(23040+23037). “4.4 months” is based on the average of 8412/22505*12 = 4.5 (vaccine) and 8124/22434*12 = 4.3 (placebo) in Fig 2.
no doubt. and now it's looking like boosters every six months, endless money train ...
No therapeutics means no competition for the vax promoters.
And no therapeutics to speak of after all this time ... criminal
The Health Ministry reported today (Thursday) that the first ten cases of the AY3 coronavirus strain based on the Delta strain had been found in Israel. The AY3 strain is based on the Delta variant, from which a number of further mutations have been found, including several considered more "virulent." Of those infected, eight had returned from abroad and two were infected inside Israel.
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/312068
Here's my take. We were warned about the cytokine storm. I believe that's what Israel is experiencing. Those that rec'd the early shots and were exposed to a variant, whether it be Delta or any other, had a severe reaction.
I have a grim outlook on this vax situation. With each new Booster, that produces mutations/variants, then you eventually need another Booster to overcome the new variant, then the latest Booster produces more mutations/variants, on and on, eventually vaxxed people are going to need a Booster daily due to the multitude of variants produced by all the Boosters.
Take note, the current Booster will be out before a year has transpired from the orignial vax?
I'm no scientist but that's my layman's view.
The New York Times admits that there is a big problem in Israel.
0 Covid deaths in June.
230 Covid deaths this month.
"Data suggests the possibility of an increased risk of severe disease in those who received their vaccination early."nytimes.com/2021/08/18/wor…
t.me/momotchiii/1321
I'm sure they would pass the buck.
Well that is good. The indemnity from liability raised a red flag for a lot of people I am sure.
I wonder what would happen if someone had the Pfizer vaccine, then got the Cominarty booster. Complications arise a year or two down the road.
Would Pfizer be able to claim it was the vaccine under EUA and not Comirnaty that caused the issue?
The brand name and the labeling maybe?
"Why didn't approve the same vaccine that is out right now?"
The only difference was that I heard from a broadcast was that Pfizer is exempt from liability whereas Comirnaty agreed to be liable for damages arising from the jab.
Why didn't approve the same vaccine that is out right now???? What changes were made? Am I reading this wrong??
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine contains a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA(modRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 formulated in lipid particles. COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is the same formulation as the PfizerBioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and can be used interchangeably with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series.8
https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
kt
its approved but a bunch of studies are deferred.
https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download
"Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine contains a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 formulated in lipid particles. COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is the same formulation as the PfizerBioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and can be used interchangeably with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series.8
8 The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used
interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The
products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.
Page 2
https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
"On August 23, 2021, having concluded that revising this EUA is appropriate to protect the public
health or safety under section 564(g)(2) of the Act, FDA is reissuing the August 12, 2021 letter
of authorization in its entirety with revisions incorporated to clarify that the EUA will remain in
place for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for the previously-authorized indication and
uses, and to authorize use of COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) under this EUA for
certain uses that are not included in the approved BLA"
https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
“I don’t want to frighten you,” COVID-19 czar Dr. Salman Zarka told the Israeli parliament. “But this is the data. Unfortunately, the numbers don’t lie.”
A massive surge of infections in ultra-vaxxed Israel is pointing to a complicated path ahead.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/ultra-vaccinated-israels-debacle-is-a-dire-warning-to-america
“Israel is the GOLD Standard too!
Anyone out there know whether this is accurate:
Heard that the COMIRNATY®, COVID-19 mRNA vaccine that was just approved is not available. That it is not even in production.
So, if someone wants the approved vaccine where do they get it?
As to the military, I don't see how they can be vaccinated by Sept. 15th if the vaccine is not available.
If the above is true, will the people be confused and mixed up and take the Pfizer EUA jab thinking they are getting the real deal COMIRNATY?????
Comments appreciated.
China got rid of the Covid rapidly with the use of hydroxy based on trials that showed efficacy in treating Covid. Now knowing that fact, isn't it criminal that Fauci, knowing this, banned our citizens the right to such treatment?
How many elderly in New York needlessly died due to Fauci's decision?
How many elderly in New Jersey needlessly died due to Fauci's decision?
How many elderly in Pennsylvania needlessly died due to Fauci's decision?
How many elderly in Michigan needlessly died due to Fauci's decision?
How many elderly in Illinois needlessly died due to Fauci's decision?
How many people overall suffered the devasting results of the Fauci decision?
Dr. Zelenko
@ZZ611
·
Follow the Commissioners...
Scott Gottlieb - Former Commissioner of the FDA resigns and then goes to Pfizer to be on the board of directors.
Stephen Hahn - Replaces Gottlieb as FDA Commissioner and eventually resigns. He is now the Chief Medical Officer for Moderna.
Janet Woodcock - Wrongly advises Rick Bright (a fully-controlled individual) that HCQ is a dangerous drug requiring EUA that should be ONLY limited to hospitalized patients. Remember, all of the relevant clinical data at the time showed HCQ to be extremely effective in early treatment and NOT in hospitalized patients. Several months later Janet Woodcock replaces Stephen Hahn as the Commissioner of the FDA.
Is this all making sense yet?
To Gardenrose it is making sense, it proves what I've been harping on for over a year. The FDA KNEW that hydroxy did not work in late treatment, only when treatment was given "early."
Remember I told you on the FAKE Lancet article it yanked the Emergency Use that hdroxy could be prescribed for home use. It then allowed hydroxy to be only used in a hospital setting. FDA was well aware that this new designation of only the hospitalized would rigg the results to show that hydroxy was useless.
Why Aren't People Getting Vaxxed? Because of Your Hypocrisy | Opinion
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/why-aren-t-people-getting-vaxxed-because-of-your-hypocrisy-opinion/ar-AANDdSe?ocid=entnewsntp
When former President Barack Obama hosted a birthday bash amid a COVID-19 surge across the country, it was not an unusual or one-off situation. As in many contexts, it's not the rules that anger American tax-payers so much as the myriad exceptions to them—and who those exceptions always seem to favor.
In many situations in the U.S., particularly during these Plague Years, citizens have found themselves constrained by a remarkably detailed sets of rules. At the same time, these rules seem beset by exceptions, particularly for the "politically correct." And it is often taboo to discuss them honestly.
Take my own state of Kentucky, a relatively relaxed purple state. Today in Kentucky, anyone entering a state building is required to wear at least one mask and socially distance, regardless of COVID vaccination status. For much of 2020, all so-called non-essential businesses—gyms, hair salons, nail salons, spas, concert venues, entertainment facilities, even doctor and dentist offices—were shuttered. Governor Andy Beshear banned gatherings of more than 10 people, an unexceptional edict across the U.S.
But almost immediately, exceptions to the drum-beat of messaging of "shelter in place" and "save just one life" emerged as massive marches and riots swept the country. One of the most memorable features of 2020—right alongside the demand that we spend all day inside—was the giant street protests following the May 25 death of George Floyd. Between 15 and 26 million people took part in these public rallies; many many citizens were outside, all day, during the apex of the pandemic.
And many of the nation's leading infectious disease experts suddenly began to encourage leaving home to protest. More than 1,200 public health professionals signed on to a letter, reprinted in full by CNN, endorsing the George Floyd protests and calling on elected officials not to use COVID concerns as an "excuse" to shut any of them down.
"We do not condemn these gatherings as risky for COVID-19 transmission," the signatory doctors said. In fact, these were "vital to the national public health," in that they challenged another real threat in United States: "the pervasive lethal force of white supremacy." Perhaps most remarkably, the physicians restricted their support for protesting only to events on the Left: "This should not be confused with a permissive stance on all gatherings, particularly protests against stay-home orders. Those actions not only oppose public health interventions, but are also rooted in white nationalism and run contrary to respect for Black lives."
Got it.
It is unsurprising that in the face of such open double standards, many citizens have moved beyond amused cynicism and into contempt for "expertise" and the law. To many taxpayers where I live and no doubt across the country, the sheer hypocrisy was stultifying and remains so.
For almost a year later, not much has changed. With "Delta" surging, COVID paranoia is again on the rise, and the papers are full of suggestions about double-masking and harshly worded criticism of anyone refusing vaccination, including from The Economist ("The Republican Anti-Vaxx Delusion"), Bloomberg ("There's a Logic to Anti-Vaxx Republicans' Irrationality"), the Washington Post ("Republicans Unleashed a Deadly Vaccine Hesitancy"), and The Atlantic ("Delta is ruining the summer, and it's anti-vaxxers' fault").
But, again, there are obvious logical gaps in the narrative, which are Not to Be Discussed, but which citizens can hardly avoid noticing. "Wear two masks and then stay home"-style regulations seem never to extend to money-making million-person festivals such as Lollapalooza, which just took place in Chicago—although there was substantial criticism of the Sturgis biker rally taking place in a redder state.
Nor is much said about the potential impact of illegal immigration on U.S. COVID caseload, despite the fact that undocumented crossings of the Southern border are currently surging, and a remarkable 18 percent of migrants leaving Border Patrol facilities recently tested positive for COVID-19.
Perhaps most notably, the almost univariate focus of the mainstream media on MAGA conservatives as anti-vaxxers ignores equivalent or higher non-vaccination rates across most minority communities. Among Black Americans—few of whom know the word "Tuskeegee" as anything other than the name of a college—only 38 percent of individuals have accepted even one dose of any coronavirus vaccine. (Witty conservatives like Will Chamberlain have gone viral on Twitter for pointing out that vaccine passports could arguably amount to a form of de facto segregation, and the Mayor of Boston has famously compared forcing minorities to "show their papers" to slavery and similar "unsavory parts of American history.")
Sadly, there's evidence to suggest that the real reason people may be so hesitant to get vaccinated is the crisis in credibility of the medical establishment, which it sacrificed to political ends. And the effects on the citizenry of COVID hypocrisy may take a while to fade. No one likes taking orders, but few people truly object to following consistent rules that make sense. What people do object to is following what seem to be illogical rules with dozens of exceptions carved out for those favored by one political faction or the other.
The anger caused by this hypocrisy correlates with recent findings that only 52 percent of Americans have a high level of trust in the CDC, just 29 percent of Americans (and far fewer conservatives) trust the national media, and exactly 9 percent of us have a positive view of Congress.
To fix this, leaders might just have to return to some very old and simple standards: Make consistent rules based on actual empirical facts, and then apply them fairly to all.
Wilfred Reilly is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Kentucky State University.
The views in this article are the writer's own.
The reason I believe it was credible is because this information published in early 2020 was suppressed world-wide, nobody in the Western world published it or acknowledged it. The West went on a rampange to suppress hydroxy from discussion. Matter of fact if China wanted to harm us, why would they promote the effectiveness of hydroxy? since it would reduce the Covid impact if early treatment was used.
Then a year later, the West accumulated data showing what the Chinese already knew, that hydroxy was very effective against Covid.
It is a customary treatment for those brave doctors that will treat patients with hydroxy and Ivermectin, including my doctor and others:
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/treatments/
Ivermectin Data
https://ivmmeta.com/
Hydroxy Data
https://c19hcq.com/
Don’t believe anything China says at all.
Some interesting facts from UK. Page 22-23 has a nice breakdown between vaccinated and unvaccinated people that need emergency care.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1012644/Technical_Briefing_21.pdf
kt
China got rid of the Covid rapidly with the use of hydroxy based on trials that showed efficacy in treating Covid. Now knowing that fact, isn't it criminal that Fauci, knowing this, banned our citizens the right to such treatment?
Smitter the people are desperate and cannot get a prescription for Ivermectin. Between fear of death and dying with Covid they'd rather take the risk with Ivermectin for livestock. Not much choices, if they go to a hospital they may be on a ventilator and there's a likely chance they will not recover. This is what our criminal public health policy has created.
Dumbass people buying horse meds or feed at tractor supply and overdosing. Some cannot fix stupid
Here's an excerpt from the India Bar Assoc. complaint:
"Both the media houses are known for their agenda against the present
government at the Centre.
Page 35 of 132
"These media houses depicted a sad, miserable picture of India was across the world despite the fact that India was doing much better than any other country,
particularly better than America where Dr. Faucci was in charge.
xiii) It seems that, the entire exercise was done only because Central
Government of India has allowed the use of ‘Ivermectin’ and therefore the
interest of vaccine Syndicate were hurt and they wanted to defame,
overshadow the effectiveness of said effective medicine so as to create market for their harmful vaccines to fulfil their future plans." (p. 35)
https://indianbarassociation.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/HRSC-LETTER-TO-HONBLE-PRIME-MINISTER-OTHERS-COVID-19.pdf
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |