Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You ever look on renuen twitter page and see who they are following, gambling sites, not much there on renewable energy, what a shame.
IIRC, end of March for the annual.
Been on the road and out of touch for quite a bit but IMO everything hinges on the outcome of this lawsuit. Have to believe that the lawyers are calling all the shots.
Last time I looked there was an extension given to one of the defendants to file additional info on their motion to dismiss. I think they were given 2 weeks so not looking for much new info any time soon.
Best
Smh on this one. Its a shame, appears that this company is more consumed with law suits than business. They have given no justification why anyone should invest in this company.
Are we still alive here or has this become a typical pinkie
All~ seeing nothing new on pacer other than a little "jockeying" that appears to have been dismissed/dismantled. Looks like the case will proceed as filed other than Cathy Learman representing herself and all others represented by another attorney.
At least someone is buying shares. It's been awhile.
it sure is quiet on the renuen front right now
I don't have anything to add: Been busy with holidays, travel, work backing up, etc. Every once in awhile I do a search, but not nearly as indepth as what I usually do.
Until some action starts taking place on the lawsuit end, I don't see a ton of new developments or information being found.
It is what it is. Just have to wait and see what "it" really is.
Best.
My guess would be,with the lawsuit and all, that were not going to hear very much from a business standpoint......at least it seems that way.
Sigh.......
I am beginning to wonder if we are still in business, haven't heard anything from anyone.
Any new updates here??
I haven't checked pacer over the holidays.
Back at u! Hopefully at some point in 2015 all will be cleared up and renu can focus solely on the business at hand......and.....hopefully that will translate into shareholder value.
Isn't filing a false police report still illegal in Florida?? If so, I guess that's a challenge to the intelligence of the judge, legal system and police department.
I suppose when pinned in a corner by ones own constant lies and attempted cover ups for what they have done it's a natural reaction yet it will not help the parties involved imo.
See thru paper is.....well......see thru paper.
Document 63 filed today regarding the proposed change of venue and the Plaintiff's opposition to same.......
Huge affidavit/denial of the "friend who's not a friend" (Boling- and note his"friendship/not friendship" is with one of the defendants, not with RENU)- The denial stating not having any association in any capacity with RENU.
Well, then. I guess fact checking really does help clear up some of that deceitful garbage that was posted.
Maybe we'll find out next that none of us are associated with the mafia..............................
In regards to KES, what's your take on the company? I didn't recognize the names in the SOS filing.
Links:
http://klearenergysolutions.com
https://opencorporates.com/data/21107280
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail/EntityName/flal-l14000184118-64d64938-8ff6-42dd-8ede-999d1697257c/klear%20energy%20solutions/Page1
https://www.facebook.com/klearenergysolutions
http://cfl.craigslist.org/sls/4806306585.html
https://www.facebook.com/klearenergysolutions/photos/pb.1721111358114571.-2207520000.1419094178./1723393474553026/?type=1
Hey man, try being me. I got blasted when my opinion of the old (D woods) renu was known. I didn't think it was a real deal........then I get threatened by this crew when I give nemes a chance and believe in the company's game plan. Guess what, still believe in RENU's gameplan although others have made the road much more difficult for e company. I say he pulls it off and eventually turns renu into a solid small company.
Seems I can't win either way.....good thing I really don't give a shit what others my think.LOL.
Your below quote says it all>>>>>>
"The day is coming when we are all going to find out what is right and what is wrong. My conscience is clean. I can post here with my head held up. "
Jayyy, a bit of advice:
Don't believe everything you read on the internet, and that includes on public posting forums. Verify all of the information, starting with the source, and independently double check all links, before putting any faith and/or money at risk.
Several individuals who have been long on RENU read the garbage that was being posted and immediately recognized it as false. Some were actually hysterical over the propensity that someone went to, to fabricate falsities and innuendo. Their messages started off with "Can you really believe that they said........."
You know why some individuals on this board were targeted? Because we dig hard and we verify facts. Through intimidation, they hoped to shut down a few people and thus drive investors away, and ultimately tank the play.
Didn't work, although it made a dent. Why didn't it work? Because those who are here, and have been here, have done their homework. They know what is A and what is B. All the lies in the world, no matter how many times they are told, don't change that.
The day is coming when we are all going to find out what is right and what is wrong. My conscience is clean. I can post here with my head held up.
I post mainly in the positive, because I do have some good money at risk (relatively speaking), but I always try to link my information so others can evaluate for themselves and make the best choice possible for themselves. Ask around, I never beat anyone up for selling, I never beat anyone up for not investing, I never coerce anyone to invest. Same as every other bit of information on the internet: Evaluate my post and information via one's own research and verification, and then invest, or don't invest, accordingly.
I guess in a sense, I have received some "compensation" in the fact that I have met a number of great people doing this and have made some good friends- some still here, some long gone.
That's about all I have to say on the subject. Take it for what it's worth.
Jay, I think if you take some time to read posts made by the investors on this board that are being accused of working with or compensated by RENU, it will become clear that they are nothing more than regular investors who are passionate about seeing the company succeed.
Heck, I have seen them even criticize the company when it was warranted so believing the misconstrued views about them on those Internet posts is very sad, especially when they contain personal info. I question more those hiding behind an anonimous handle that use slanderous comments to bring someone or a company down.
Just my two cents on the matter.
finishsuper, your sory is similar to mine. I'm simply an investor who speaks with IR regularly to garner whatever information that I can. I am not invested in Renu, but just in Roth. I am not a farmer, but just a mechanical engineer.
Jayyy, I believe scam.com is one of the websites cited in the complaint and they may wind up having to defend themselves. I read the entire complaint when it first came out, but this is what I recall.
That looks like a 2 for 2.
So how about a little "tit for tat"? What's the Jayyy backstory?
I am nothing more than a shareholder, who views my stock ownership as part owner of the company I hold stock in.
Therefore, I do my research and make contact with whoever I can. As with any other company that I own shares in, I do maintain contact with IR, and with the CEO. If either party will not return my emails, I will not invest in their company.
I receive nothing in any form of payment or compensation for the research I do, for the posts I make, or for anything else. I am a simple shareholder with a big mouth.
I learned from a friend that I made on Ihub in another play, how to do simple and in depth research, how and why to contact IR and CEOs, and what importance to place upon that information, or lack thereof. That lesson helped me greatly in my personal investing and in my public posting.
I've been in this "play" for sheesh...... 4+ years? So, yes, I have contacted IR a ton. Before becoming CEO, Nemes was in this company in other capacities, and he has made it clear that he is willing to communicate with shareholders and interested parties. Several others have attested that they have communicated with him.
If you really want the "down low" on me: I'm a simple hillbilly, living off of what grows in the field, or happens to run through the field. My favorite clothing is bib overalls and I drive a pickup truck. I play in a few stocks for a hobby, with the hopes of maybe turning a pennies into nickels so my kids have more than I do.
Not sure why I'm confessing anything here. 99% of the people on this board know me, communicate with me, and have no reservations about anything I've said above.
All the best.
At first(if you look back) I did not think renu was for real. This was back when Don wood was running the company. As Nemes took over and took the company in a different direction I decided to give renu another chance.
Now to answer your questions~
I have never spoken to nemes or Irving or anyone related to the company......closest I ever came to nemes was on the tv screen during the St. Cloud televised meeting.
I am compensated and work for no company other than the company I'm employed at.
I am a common shareholder with shares bought on the open market just as any joe blo out here.
ALOT of misinformation out there......take that into account as you do your research.
Gl
I have some questions that you all could help us with. Some of you are accused of working with IR and getting compensation to do so. Can you say yes or deny. Also seems that some of you may be investigated during the preparation for the court case. Is this true also? Thanks
Hey man..... Nice site a first glance. The address seems familiar....where do I know that address from???
Where??
Snizz? What do you make out of this site: http://klearenergysolutions.com/#home
Klear Energy Solutions by RenuEn is focused on promoting energy efficiency, renewable solutions and environmental stewardship.
Not sure, but I don't think it will be too quick. I haven't seen any of the John Does listed yet, so will need all of their information (lawyers, depositions, etc). And 1 of the current defendants already has a time extension for some stuff.
I think it's going to take awhile to see progress and completion of this. I don't see a settlement happening either- too much personal and too much way over the line. I think that option was scuttled long before this ever went to trial.
JMO, but I have no where else to go. Gonna sit back and watch it unfold.
I wonder when things get started in court? Sometime in January?
CEO tweet links to an interesting read: https://twitter.com/renuenceo
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/2012/12/04/1cdfa582-3978-11e2-a263-f0ebffed2f15_story.html
But that right does not extend to defamatory speech. Lawyers across the country are more aggressively using a combination of legal maneuvers and computer forensics to help uncover the identities of anonymous commentators and sue them.
And some of those cases are producing astronomical awards. This year, an Anaheim, Calif., technology company won a $1.6?million judgment against a blogger who had accused the company of stealing money from business associates. And in 2006, a Florida woman won a $11.3?million judgment after a Louisiana woman called her a “crook” and a “con artist” in an Internet forum.
Yeah, this is like the preliminaries for a heavyweight title bout- working out all the details, the venue, what size gloves, how many rounds........
I check PACER about 1x or 2x a week, but other than that, just waiting for the main event to start.
Lol, hey Champ, what's up?
I think your assessment is correct, but I can't tell which party is resistent to meeting. I assume it is the defendant and not the plaintif.
It only makes sense to share the information before the trial to get any easy issues resolved before the trial and so the lawyers can defend and respond. Otherwise, the trial would be a lot longer.
If one party is not cooperative bfore the trial the judge will be unhappy with that party. It's in everyones best interest to share appropriate information before the trial.
No, I am not a lawyer.
http://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/forms/usdc-mdfl-localrules12-2009.pdf
All Greek to me, but here it is. Looks like there was a failure to confer with opposing party, maybe?
(g) Before filing any motion in a civil case, except a motion for injunctive relief, for
judgment on the pleadings, for summary judgment, to dismiss or to permit maintenance of a class
action, to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or to involuntarily
dismiss an action, the moving party shall confer with counsel for the opposing party in a good faith
effort to resolve the issues raised by the motion, and shall file with the motion a statement (1)
certifying that the moving counsel has conferred with opposing counsel and (2) stating whether
counsel agree on the resolution of the motion. A certification to the effect that opposing counsel
was unavailable for a conference before filing a motion is insufficient to satisfy the parties’ obligation
to confer. The moving party retains the duty to contact opposing counsel expeditiously after filing12/1/09 3 - 2
and to supplement the motion promptly with a statement certifying whether or to what extent the
parties have resolved the issue(s) presented in the motion. If the interested parties agree to all or
part of the relief sought in any motion, the caption of the motion shall include the word “unopposed,”
“agreed,” or “stipulated” or otherwise succinctly inform the reader that, as to all or part of the
requested relief, no opposition exists.
Looks like Steven Lerman (defendant) was trying to replace his current attorney with a Gary K. oldehoff. This request appears to be "DENIED" based on a local law/rule 3.01(g).
No ide what that rule/law is or who the newly requested attorney is but will research as time permits.
Just saw some of that stuff.......some old stuff seems to be.....well.......missing. I have screenshots of it if anyone out there needs.
One word comes to mind.....vile!
A question from what I saw......Arizona time?? Does that mean the blogger was from Arizona and lying about their location or is ripoff report from Arizona? I didn't understand that part.
DJ Kim.......way to stand tall!
Got it.....agree 100%. Waiting it out, see what happens.
Type "RENUEN" in the search box. There are about a dozen, and you will quickly notice that they are all "copy and pastes" of all the other smear stuff that was put out there.
Funny thing about that site: They claim they will never take any of it down, even at the request of the original author, BUT there is a place you can go and pay a few hundred dollars and they will advise you on what you can do about it.
This is why it was listed in the original complaint that the smear damage done, is also ongoing. Even with a judgment in favor of RENU, some of these sites will still have the garbage on display.
AND, even beyond that, anyone with decent searching skills can still find pages that were removed (cached) or posts that were removed. Just have to know how and what to ask Google. The internet is forever.
Lastly, we know how things work here with new investors, and probably the same with new business or contacts: Peeps do a rudimentary search, find the trash, and that becomes their soapbox. Takes a lot more posts and links of truth and facts to undo one or two untruths. Hopefully the judge or jury realize this in their consideration of penalties.
Personally I think ripoff report is a complete joke.....it doesn't looks like anything more than "if you have a or want to bitch site".
What other ones are linked with ripoff report??
Looks like subpoenas are being issued. All of the posts on RipOffReport have this (or a similar) reply, and were updated early last week:
#1 General Comment
Legal Notice
AUTHOR: Legal Notice - ()
SUBMITTED: Monday, December 08, 2014
Please take notice that RenuEn Corporation, et al. (“Plaintiffs”) have initiated an action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, civil action number 6:14cv-1754-ORL-41TBS (the “Action”), due to allegedly false statements about Plaintiffs made by “Brett Chance.” In the Action, Plaintiffs seek to subpoena the records of Xcentric Ventures, LLC for contact information and any other messages that you have posted on Ripoff Report under this pseudonym, or any other pseudonyms, about Plaintiffs, to Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease, LLP at: 301 E. Fourth Street, Suite 3500, Great American Tower, Cincinnati, OH 45202.
Plaintiffs have served a subpoena on Xcentric Ventures, LLC, the company that owns and operates this website, to reveal your identity.
You may have a right to file and serve a response to the subpoena anonymously. If you intend to file and serve a response, please do so, or notify us of your intent to do so, on or before December 22, 2014, Whitney C. Gibson, Esq. via email (wcgibson@vorys.com) or facsimile (513-852-7825).
ROAD TRIP TO FLA
I Would love to be in this courtroom when ALLthis hits the fan.
Did a bit of research on Whitney Gibson and Vorys...... I don't think we have anything to worry about when it comes to internet research and discovery.
The reason, IMO, that this group and this particular individual were brought in, is because they are the best at what they do, and they have a track record to back that up.
On the other hand, when you have the other side making such simple and blatant errors in historical, well-documented items.....
So long as renu (nemes) have a keen attorney and provide this attorney with solid/verifiable information all is good......REALLY GOOD imo.
If we (mainly you) can do it rather easily and without any compensation RENU's attorney should have no problem here.......
OK, so re-reading this and trying to figure this out:
The Court has found that Ms. Lerman is not admitted to practice in the Middle District of Florida. (Doc. 51). For this reason, the motion is DENIED with one exception. Ms. Lerman may represent herself.
Additionally, Shaka has appointed J. Charles Nemes as Executive Vice President of Operations and Business Development. Mr. Nemes is the former Chief Operating Officer of SDI Solar, a Florida manufacturer and installer of solar products and services. Most recently, he has been a consultant to Shaka as the Company began making acquisitions and strategic alliances in the solar industry.
While consulting, developing and assisting a few smaller financial businesses, in June of 2010, ISD Financial Group was hired by West Palm Beach Solar Manufacturer and Integrator SDI Solar. The 37 year old company wished to expand and grow the company rapidly and hired ISD and Mr. Nemes to assist with implementing a management, installation, marketing and sales strategy. Mr. Nemes began consulting in the capacity of Chief Operating Officer for the company..........
Looks like your correct on the representation issue. I either jumped over that document or didn't get to it yet. Good catch.
Kinda put reading all the motions and procedure stuff on the back burner, as some of it can and will change or be unrelated. Will try to keep an eye on it though and get some of the highlights (or lowlights, as the case may be).
Not sure if you saw the police report attached to learmans filing to the court using it as a tool to move venues but.........I'll let you all make your own conclusions on it.
Courts , judges, police departments just aren't stupid.....but I guess some think they are......idk
All imo of course.
Followers
|
144
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
28870
|
Created
|
11/29/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Market Value1 | $2,202,172 | a/o Aug 08, 2014 |
Shares Outstanding | 32,868,238 | a/o Mar 31, 2014 |
Float | 3,895,991 | a/o Mar 31, 2014 |
Authorized Shares | 500,000,000 | a/o Mar 31, 2014 |
Par Value | Not Available |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
Contact and Inquiries for Investor Relations:
Sept 13, 2013 | RenuEn Corp Announces St. Cloud City Council Decision |
Sept 3, 2013 | RenuEn Corp Announces CNG Gas Purchase Agreement (UCF Incubator) |
Aug 30, 2013 | RenuEn Corp Announces Investor Conference Call |
Aug 24, 2013 | RenuEn Corporate Update |
Jun 19, 2013 | RenuEn Corp Announces Update to Expansion of Energy Solutions in Florida |
DAILY | WEEKLY | |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |