Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Oh nice, so.. you being a useless poster could fork over millions for a publicly trading company? You see I'm responding to you for humor on a Friday. I see you still spreading the same nonsense as you were months ago before I blocked you, guess some people don't change,but, ya gotta eat so I respect that. As for me I know what the cause of the CE was. I know "someone" dumped 300 mill just below .02 which triggered the authorities to look at the company as the facilitators of a pump n dump. Problem is, the company held no common shares..
So that question STILL has not been answered who did it. Now.. today we mysteriously have "someone " seemingly surrendering shares and what seems to be a predetermined price. Don't give me multiple people sold in fear bs. SO ..did authorities finally step in after the audit proves it wasn't the company. Did the sharholder records finally prove WHO did this? Some think it's a margin call. Me thinks the SEC made a few calls. No one unloads this amount of shares especially at this price after an audit.
How's that for a conspiracy theory? Hell I'm almost as good as you!!
otc cleared of what exactly?ce is there isn't it?no deal has happened,nothing has happened period.I knew this stock way b4 any of you kids drunk the african kool aid .Absolutely no change in business since 10yr ago.Your problem is,you only know what dj post and deletes on X.Again,this are not the people who can do big things here in US or anywhere else.Their hope is brics money and connection,otherwise dj is useless farmer as he was all his life.
I'll leave you to die on that hill, as none of what you said you can prove is the issue, while I have filings to prove otherwise. But what else do you have? Nothing but assumptions as you AGAIN overlook that the OTC cleared the company of any promotional activity. But you go ahead, I know u gotta eat. Cause bs ind conjecture is all you got.
As for the order and the rest of that crap you're trying to pass off. I'd point t you to thr Audit as the audit cover both internal and external communications INCLUDING the order which was in the press release. You should also note that statement from the auditor which say no fraud was found. Omission or a public false statement about an order would be misleading which was ALSO stated in the auditors notes. Or was the Auditor lying too? You see that's why I can call your statements bullshit, because they are your feelings, not backed up with any factual information to support them as being the source of the CE. You never will be able to. But keep talking as more and more documents and developments come out to prove you wrong. As for me I'm looking at the real contributors and actors in this mess.
Literally nothing Cowboy Jim has told shareholders has come to fruition. Just out of curiosity, how is the current MJ crop cycle coming along. I'll bet it is either non-existent, or they don't want us to know (not in the mood to share the profit). Who are the buyers lined up?
Crickets.
didn't dj say there's going to be lawsuit in africa?what happened there?
the whole article with all the bullshit about what they do and etc.. was deleted,normal person will ask why?so is all the tweets,again why?
ce came after all those dylon crys!stop making things up.Again,promo.is not illegal,pumping is.CE doesn't affect any buisness whatsoever,ce has nothing to do with buisness operation.There never was any entity or any name mentioned as to who they sold it to.This is all what cowboy wanted to do maybe,when saying 300mill transfer to txtm,however that never happened either,so,you can argue with yourself,but reality is,still ce,no offtake transfer,no deal whatsoever,problem of filling since day one,argue with otc,time and again,saying it's otc fault,or paper mistake,all while it was just a lye and nothing to show for.
More bullshit and assumptions. Prove the deal was not real and not affected by the CE. Show me evidence of fraud, collusion an SEC investigation or. How but proof the company lief about the OTCM stating they're wad no promotional activity by them. You keep spewing this nonsense and ignoringnthe DATE of that disclosure, being well away that these bs claims you're stating occurred BEFORE the notification that I stickied all long time ago at the top of this board.. yet given time someone like you wants to crawl from under a rock and IGNORE the facts that make these assumptions blatantly FALSE as to the CAUSE of the CE.
Interesting. 100% buyings today.Looks like that seller has done. TXTM.
Now there's someone on stocktweets saying he bought on margin today,can't make this shit up
promotional activity is legal,and otc let's you know about promo.going on.Dylon posted and deleted a cry to all known mj.co.That is pumping,and there's a difference.Lying about all the non existing deals on social media,also considered pumping.etc..
Bullshit. Read the SEC statues. They leave it up to the company to distance itself form promotional activity they did not do, which TXTM did almost immediately. The promotion WAS NOT interactive to the company, not in tweets not in ANY stamenents that is what THE OTC SAID to the company those are the facts.
Wow you emptied your bags 🚂 never mind you'll eat tonight 🍔🍟
🥳
He is acting as if MANAGEMENT made him hold his “shares.” I really don’t think he owns any.
There's no such thing as external pumping,if co. has nothing to do with it there will be no ce.Dylon pumped it to all known mj brands!where have you been.There's no fraud,simply there's no buisness to be a fraud.From day one,the way the rsammda was set up,promised 300-400mill offtake agreements,etc.. and to this day nothing.I bet rsammd itself is nothing either,afterall it was a cow feed business,and then they try to score a big one without knowing how.and now 18mo later they still have no clue.So..
Maybe you should “suck harder” so you can get a 25% raise and you can stop doing all this whining.
Accountable? Management? For what exactly? Not filing on time? Cor converting and dumping shares?
How about you hold the ones surrounding the ARTICLE accountable? You know , the firm and writer who put it out and also disclosed they held a position in the company as they pumped it? What about them? We have found ZERO fraud within the company. ZERO.
MAY companies have been victims of external causes for the CE, random emails, even mentions in lawsuits they were not a party to. That's thier fault too? The company has done everything legally they can and continue to do so while you want " accountability and based it on bullshit accusations and conclusions with NO PROOF it was the cause of CE. Time for that obvious noise to stop. Like seriously.
Youre just too young and dumb to even argue with, suck harder.
You had plenty of time to dump. 5, 10, 15….percent loss, but you held just so you can whine about it later. I’m guessing you invested your rent money. NEVER INVEST MONEY YIY CANT AFFORD TO LOSE. DUH!
🙄 how old are you? Suck harder.
Actually, you are the loser. Why didn’t you dump when CE hit? It’s like you wanted some to whine about, dude. Don’t worry though. You just got your 12% raise. Did they move you to burger to fries. LMAO!
So much for all the hypes about AUDITED FINANCIALS?😂😂😂
I already knew it was a nothing burger.
He’s delusional to the extreme.
DONT WASTE YOUR BREATHE and let him live in his imaginary TXTM world.😂😂😂
Is that you selling 🚂👀
Anytime stock goes CE,and you don't hold mgmt.accountable you are a Loser!
Someone who is honest and realistic about the issue and not some sycophant fanboy who doesn’t believe in holding anyone in management accountable.
sadly in some sick way you think by kissing their azzes they will do the right thing or if you hold them accountable they will punish you for not being an obedient servant.
So after 19 months of nothing from management and being honest makes me a bear in your eyes?
Cool call me a bear but at least I can be honest with myself about what’s right in front of me. Can you say the same?
Yesterday was a clear example pointed out by me and a few others you know very little about stuff you put out acting as if you are all knowing when clearly you are not by not being able to answer a few simple basic questions.
But like I said go back to you silly little discord and have your ego stroked by those who don’t know any better.
I.. cannot argue with that perspective. I always reserve the possibility that there are real shareholders behind the names on these screens. It's undeniable that many people are in pain and been hurt by the events over the last 19 months.
A lot of emotion and anger is justified at this point, but the facts say that it has been largely misplaced. All of the frustration has been aimed at the company and very little point back to what we know is the root cause of this mess. That being said, the company could have walked away as 99% of them do and leave sharholder dead in the water. This has taken a lot of twists and turns, sometimes seemingly almost over ,then suffer a setback for whatever reason.ive simply pointed out the facts along the way and gave my opinion on them. Operative word is opinion. No one forced anyone to hit the buy button here.That responsibility lies with each investor. What I can definitely say is all of the true shareholders outside of speedtrader bought into this with 1% of the information and understanding we have now. So while it's been hell, looking at the bigger picture we are poised to by a mammoth company. You believe it all. Or you believe none of it.
We're an audited company now, a far cry from pink limited. We're heading for SEC reporting, not dying on the Grey's.
You are basically saying, “I own shares, but please don’t let no one invest to cover my bags. I need something to whine about.” LMAO!
The funny part is when someone agreed with Para (something positive), you responded with “suck harder.”
Why didn’t you say the same thing when someone agreed with you? Dude, you are a bear. Quit begging: LMAO!
He is not an investor. What investor in their right mind would bash a stock that they own? A real investor would HOPE that people buy so they can find an exit point. All of them are the same. They PRETEND to be investors and then when someone brings up something positive, they find every way to shut it down. He argued you to death at EVERY positive aspect of your post. Does that actually sound like someone who own shares and wants to get out? Not for one second.
I could agree with you on pretty much everything you are mentioning, BUT...
I highly suggest you go look what securities "Held of Record" means
Record holder = Shareholder of Record = Record Shareholder = Stockholder of Record
Record = "Entry" on the "ledger" at the Transfer Agent
A Shareholder of Record is a person or entity that holdstock UNDER it's OWN NAME, NOT A under a NOMINEE (unlike shares held through Online Brokerage, which are actually held under Cede&Co, the DTC nominee)
The 77 shareholders of Record is what counts for triggering the mandatory SEC reporting obligation
Yes, one broker count as 1 shareholder of record, regardless of how many customers that hold a specific stock they have.
If all the Beneficial Owners (which everyone holding shares through a broker is) would count in that 2000 or 500 shareholders there are so many companies that would be forced to become SEC reporting, it wouldn't even be funny...
Also a stock could be Penny STOCK Exempt, even have 2000 shareholders of record or 500 non accredited shareholders of record and still not trigger the SEC reporting requirements (there are other criteria than just Assets value $, for Penny Stocks Exempt status, and these criteria wouldn't trigger any reporting obligation toward the SEC)
No, it’s hilarious listening to someone whine about something they can’t control. In addition to that, you don’t sound like an investor. You sound more like a bear. My goodness, who in their right mind would bash a stock they own if they are looking for a way out. LMAO!
Absolutely not
Absolutely but why bother with this cluster F of a company? Certainly not newcomers.
Luckily I got hired by a new company and make 12% more than my last job so thank god for that so now I’m able to hold my shares longer until one day I can get out of this zhit show.
Being down 90 % no I’m stuck like all of us because of stupid mismanagement.
And you wonder why most of us are angry after over a year and a half of nothing but BS promises you witless twit. not to mention your asinine predictions.
How many shares do you own by the way since you like asking personal fincial questions.
Like I said what new retail investor would bother with this constant calamity of errors of a business.
Are you glad you poked the sleeping bear dipzhit.
Go back to your sad azz discord and have your ego stroked.
Some people just mad for no reason😂.
Don't sweat it, I surely don't. It's a stock.you don't like what's said, just keep scrolling.
I don’t understand. Why is he so angry about a stock he doesn’t own? If he held the stock, would he sell is a simple question.
This looks ready to bounce . Rough week
It certainly restricts trading. No it’s not illegal but finding a broker that lets you buy CE stocks in the US is another story.
Would you sell right now?
You are correct. Anyone saying otherwise is ill informed.
It doesn’t prevent trading for retail but for hedge funds it’s regulated.
This will be my last post addressing this. I've explained my position in as much detail as I can. I've stated that the AUDIT verified our assets, as well as our shareholder count. I don't know how else to explain my position that this is MANDATORY that we become an SEC filer which also mandates a new form 10 due to our lapse and self- termination of the registration under prior ownership. So I will AGAIN point you to your own DD for verification of this.
I've said repeatedly that the ASSETS and the AUDIT let to this threshold as well as the penny stock exempt status which look at the SAME valuation data. That is not an opinion that is fact.
So, I'll use your own post to prove my point. From the SEC website:
https://www.sec.gov/info/smallbus/secg/jobs-act-section-12g-small-business-compliance-guide
" Increased Statutory Thresholds for Registration and Termination of Registration
The JOBS Act and the FAST Act raised the thresholds for registration and termination of registration for a class of equity securities under Exchange Act Section 12(g). As a result of the statutory changes, an issuer that is not a bank, bank holding company or savings and loan holding company is required to register a class of equity securities under the Exchange Act if:
it has more than $10 million of total assets; and
the securities are “held of record” by either 2,000 persons, or 500 persons who are not accredited investors..."
It says "IS REQUIRED TO".. as in MANDATORY.. it does NOT say optional. or a requirement for registration. it is MANDATORY a company does so once these thresholds are met. This is not in dispute. The Penney stock exempt status was also triggered by the Audit. If you doubt that ,then explain why only after the audit was applied.
Again the "77" shareholders on the website is a reflection of the TA books tallying cert holders and other entities holding certificates aka brokers and specifically the DTCC(shares held at DTCC) which counts as ONE of the 77. This again, is not the same as individual shareholders (persons aka common shareholders) which imo exceeds the 2000 threshold. Have a good day.
No offense, but It's not a matter of opinion
Please show me where there is a different SEC reporting requirement for Pink Penny Stock Exempt issuers. (As in show me the relevant SEC rule on the Federal Register or the SEC related websites)
From my experience, and from what I can see, there are no special reporting requirements towards the SEC, for stocks like TXTM.
It only removes some disclosures requirements by Broker-dealers when they trade Penny stocks on behalf of their customers.
"Because of the speculative nature of penny stocks, Congress prohibited broker-dealers from effecting transactions in penny stocks unless they comply with the requirements of Section 15(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and the rules thereunder."
These SEC rules provide, among other things, that a broker-dealer must (1) approve the customer for the specific penny stock transaction and receive from the customer a written agreement to the transaction; (2) furnish the customer a disclosure document describing the risks of investing in penny stocks; (3) disclose to the customer the current market quotation, if any, for the penny stock; and (4) disclose to the customer the amount of compensation the firm and its broker will receive for the trade. In addition, after executing the sale, a broker-dealer must send to its customer monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account.
Notwithstanding that, I hope the CE gets removed sooner rather than later🤞
Showed up Friday. Never been here before.
So, if the CE prevents trading (buying actually, we can sell all we want), how is it that 240million+ shares have 'traded' since last Friday?
why would mm's bring this down?Have you asked yourself?
Also for clarification of your shareholders threshold you are misinterpreting the 77 "shareholders" on the OTCM markets website, those are NOT individual persons as described in the statute.
IMO we have far more then the minimum 2000 "persons" as described in the regulation you posted :
it has more than $10 million of total assets; and
the securities are “held of record” by either 2,000 persons, or 500 persons who are not accredited investors.
NOW at .001
THAT’S THE TRUTH
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |