Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Hopefully soon. I'm very busy with my foundation and charity token for special needs at the moment. We start our sales/ campaign this week supposedly through our VC fund and exchanges. https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/the-barry-mezey-foundation-for-autism-inc-releases-the-kwan-2-0-token-for-ieo
Only if Eddie gives me what I'm due in a settlement, pays up, and he has to drop his suit without a summary judgement.
Didnt you say that you was going to quit on stocktwist?
Wow when will the share holders get an update for that?
Typical hot air Vakser press release that says nothing tangible. Fyi. I'm going to be posting the transcript of the may 18th hearing to call you out on your bullshit. Let's see how your shareholders like to read that. I bet they'll love it to see your lies. You were to puss to even show up to the hearing. Your artworks of sky Jones are basically worthless. Fyi.
Eddie "signs more stuff"....woopieeeee
How come the BDGR board wasn't made aware of your momentous morning PR?
Can put an update about the epic dilution as of late? Don’t forget explain the promised no dilution and now thunderous dilution
Where’s the promised 8:48 am pre-market PR?
My my my...CEO lies that keep on giving. A further autopsy preceding the PR you cited---
Feb 11, 2013 (11 days before PRPM "acquired" SMG) - Administrative Proceeding by SEC in the matter of ARTFEST INTERNATIONAL, INC
"Artfest International, Inc. (CIK No. 1168738) is a revoked Nevada corporation located in Dallas, Texas with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12(g). Artfest International is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010, which reported a net loss of over $3.6 million for the prior year. As of February 5, 2013, the company’s stock symbol “ARTS”) was traded on the over-the-counter market
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2013/34-68902.pdf
# # #
March 6th-- "I FURTHER ORDER that as to Artfest International, Inc.,
April 5, 2013: Division’s motion for summary disposition;
April 26, 2013: Respondents’ reply to the motion; and
May 10, 2013: Division’s rebuttal
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2013/34-69049.pdf
# # #
April 30 (excerpts)--
SHAREHOLDERS UPDATES:
PRPM and its management is happy to contribute to the positive growth and developments of its wholly owned subsidiary, Black Dragon Resource Corp. (BDGR) . Both companies are cleared and scheduled for June 17th, pre market, 8:48 am EST PR announcement.
BDGR shared this update today:
SHAREHOLDERS UPDATES:
The management is happy to announce several new developments for BDGR. Cleared for a release June 17th, 2022, the company will announce a distribution deal. We believe that this development will add to our forward moving progress and will continue to bring added value to our shareholders.
We , as the company, wanted to launch this distribution deal, as the first in many that are on the table. The additional value, to BDGR and PRPM, both in asset inventories and an additional market cap will be a significant contributor to our milestones of development as companies, and add to the overall formula for next steps in up listing to greater tiers and markets.
From the Q3 2012 dated 12/13/2012--page 7
ProTek Capital, Inc. acquires Combat Energy Products LLC.
https://www.providencejournal.com/story/news/2013/03/04/20130304-protek-capital-inc-acquires-combat-energy-products-llc-ece/35424499007/
It would go to the Expert Market eventually. This grace period notification is gone. EdWAD probably contacted them and told them he would get an Attorney letter uploaded so they're giving him another chance.
The SEC isn't screwing around anymore with deadbeats like Eddie and others. He has to keep current or get his tickers put in the basement where they'll die. Gone are the days of updating financials every 3-5 years along with the share structure. The only time most of these asshats used to update financials is when they wanted to pull a reverse split.
People can look at these Tier changes here. You have to use the drop down box and click on Tier Changes and then find Expert Market in another drop down box. It will bring them up and also show some that have made it out of the EM and back to Pink limited or Pink Current which isn't easy or cheap to do.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/market-activity/corporate-actions
So if he does not upload Attomey letter it goes to grays?
It’s amazing they can’t turn this in on time? Lol ?? it’s an almost copy and paste.
What will be the next week excuse? Who will he blame this time?
There's no Attorney letter on the Annual,so yeah unless he gets his azzz in gear this thing is going to the Expert Market in the next day or two.
Aw shucks EdWAD.............
"Bill Gates Blasts Crypto, NFTs as Based on ‘Greater-Fool’ Theory"
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bill-gates-blasts-crypto-nfts-000929277.html
Apparently Eddie lied about "dividends."
Multiple PR's promising "FINRA approved dividends" of 2 shares of subsidiary BDGR for each share of PRPM purchased on or before the "shareholder of record" date. And when those dividend shares of stock failed to happen Eddie posted that FINRA had "not denied the request" and indicated his belief they still would.
He also announced he would go ahead and issue shares of his B-$-D tokens that PRPM shareholders would be entitled to by virtue of owning those yet-to-be-approved BDGR stock shares. A show of good faith he sez.
Only problem, as I understand "FINRA does NOT "approve or disapprove corporate actions such as dividends." Surely he knows that. I just wonder how FINRA would react knowing they were being used as an implied endorsement for a penny pump-and-dump.
Not a word about crypto, NFT, blockchain, Blackdracos, or any other business activity not to mention those much ballyhooed "FINRA approved dividends." To quote page 4--
Still trip-zero, "shell risk" scam garbage
"And q2?"--seriously?
Q1 was just filed "For the Quarterly Period ended April 30, 2022."
Q2 ends 3 months later... July 31...and disclosure due 45 days after.
Attorney Letter is still delinquent...due 120 days after the end of the fiscal year (Jan 31st).
2021 Annual Report and 2022 Q1 Report filed - so will not be going to the Expert Market on June 15.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/337307/content
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/337308/content
5,000 shares x .0002= $1.00...that's the BIG BUY today!
"This past Monday" was June 6th. Again, I first noticed the "Grace Period" warning last Wednesday June 1st and I made this post about it that day--
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169027991
The markets were closed Monday May 30th for Memorial Day. It's possible the period began the previous day (Tuesday May 31st) and I just didn't see it. Anyway, IF it indeed began June 1st then he has until next Thursday the 16th (15 CALENDAR days).. unless the Grace Period began the day before I noticed it.
This past Monday they issued the start of Grace Period, so it should be next Friday
This past Monday they issued the start of Grace Period, so it should be next Friday
Peeps are BAILING on this POS as fast as they can. ALL SELLS today except for one lame $50 buy at 0.0002.
Someone DUMPED 20M shares at 0.0001 just to be rid of Eddie and this CON JOB.
Gawd..........
Looks like next week is out to MIA
My guess is the 15th or 16th
When’s the last day?
Read again...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169071721
I noticed the Grace Period warning on Wednesday June 1st. Markets were closed that Monday so if it started May 31st I missed it. My guess is time runs out on June 15 or 16. Knowing Eddie he will come thru at the last minute to save this POS. As worthless as it is it still has value to a serial pump-and-dumper
Why have you stopped posting updates and facts about the tickers?
When does it end?
When’s the last day?
No 2021 Annual Report..no Q1..no Attorney Opinion... I first noticed the "Grace Period" warning last Wednesday June 1st. If that's when it began he has until the 16th (15 CALENDAR days) to get his poop in a group.
In addition to the fees there's always the challenge for the CEO to not incriminate himself. Among other things he made a lot of promises about forthcoming "FINRA approved stock dividends" in 2021. Filings always prove he accomplished little or nothing.
He probably can't afford it. I probably drowned the scumbag guy in financial misery for his alleged OTC/ Crypto scams and non-payment towards me with my valid UCC lien. I'm waiting now for shareholders to start contacting the feds to complain too about Eddie Vakser and his alleged scams where they have lost their money. Time to lock the bi*#h up in FEDS and throw away the key.
This security has entered a Grace Period, where it can be publicly quoted for 15 days before moving to the Expert Market for unsolicited quoting only. Securities enter the Grace Period when OTC Markets Group is no longer able to confirm that the issuer’s disclosure is current and publicly available as required under Rule 15c2-11.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/PRPM/quote
Motion to dismiss lawsuit and request for dismissal hearing date.
June 3rd, 2022
Case # D-1-GN-21-003502
Protek Capital, Inc.
Edward Vakser
Vs.
Barry Mezey
Mezey Holdings
Superstar Management Group, Inc.
Texas Secretary Of State
To Hon. Judge of said court:
Facts Regarding Discovery:
A no evidence summary motion for judgment should not be admitted or allowed as we have not entered into the discovery phase of the case yet. “Adequate time for discovery has passed according to the Texas rules of civil procedure; 166 (A).”
Facts Regarding The Case:
On February 22nd, 2013 - Present, plaintiff publicly announced in press releases and/ or agreed to acquire Superstar Management Group, Inc. “SMG” (Defendant's company) in a series of events that led to an acquisition of “SMG” by Mr. Edward Vakser and Pro Tek Capital, Inc. On the date of February 21st, 2013 Mr. Vakser made clear in emails and signed letters of intent to acquire “SMG” in 100% equity stake in the company. That day Mr. Vakser and Mr. Mezey agreed to such an acquisition of Mezey’s company by email and signed LOI’s. The following day with both parties consenting to Mr. Vakser publicly announcing the acquisition of Mezey’s company via press release to media outlets around the world, filed such an acquisition with the OTC Markets, FINRA and The U.S. Securities And Exchange Commission in official government filings on the following day of February 22nd, 2013. Mr. Vakser admitted he and/ or Pro Tek Capital, Inc. owns “SMG” as of February 22nd, 2013 in official filings and press releases despite his assertions and claims now that he never acquired “SMG” at all. (Please see exhibits submitted by the defendant to support his claim on the Texas UCC1 filing.) The plaintiff clearly purchased the defendant's company and never paid the defendant the amount owed to the defendant and the defendant is indeed entitled to damages in monetary payment to be decided by this said court under the Texas UCC1 filing only. The Texas Judicial system has zero authority to dismiss a Florida UCC1 filing as the State Of Texas lacks the proper jurisdiction to do so.
Argument For Dismissal Of The Lawsuit:
In defense of the defendant there is no statute of limitations mentioned in a specific time frame under Texas UCC Section 9 (Sales) for a secured party to file a UCC1 financing statement under Section 9 (Sales) against a debtor in a lien on the sale of a business for non-payment that defendant is aware of. Furthermore under Texas section 9 (sales) a secured party has non-liability or limited non-liability against any action brought against such a secured party unless it is fraudulent lien. Mr. Garrigan is arguing that the defendant as a (secured party) is beyond the statute of limitations to sue the plaintiff which is correct as four years have passed, unless the defendant imposes the discovery rule or fraudulent concealment rule of law in the State Of Texas. However, the defendant is not seeking to sue the plaintiff at the present time but rather enforce a UCC1 lien without suit if need be which is a legal and relevant course of action I the defendant can legally take as the secured party. Mr. Garrigan also argues my lien is fraudulent. I beg to differ and I will outline Texas statutes under section 9 (sales) below. As you read yourself your honor in the exhibits submitted to this said court a sale clearly took place and the Texas Secretary Of State’s office concurred and agreed a sale took place in their thorough verified research based upon the “evidence provided” to their office as well as to said court. Mr. Garrigan committed perjury in the “status hearing” on May 18th, 2022, by stating “No sale ever took place of my business to Mr. Edward Vakser and Protek Capital, Inc. Mr. Garrigan has “zero evidence” to back up his claims or assertions. Please see Texas UCC section 9 (sales) relevant statutes below pertaining to this lawsuit in favor of the defendant. The defendant falls under sec. 9.708 (2) B, under Texas section 9 (sales.) Defendant also falls under non-liability or limited non-liability under Texas Section 9 (sales.) Under section 9.628 (1) (2) B, (2) C, consumer goods (1), along with the rest of the statute . These statutes provide protections for defendant under continuation of perfection of a security interest and allow such a UCC1 financing statement to be filed and afford the defendant non-liability under section 9 (sales) as the defendant provided verifiable evidence and proof that a transaction took effect and place on February 22nd, 2013 - Present in a mutual agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant for the sale of defendants business to the plaintiff. The defendant asks for a summary judgment in his favor, full dismissal of this frivolous lawsuit, and that the plaintiff be held accountable with sanctions by this said court to be paid to the defendant. Defendant requests a hearing to dismiss the lawsuit as soon as possible and asks that plaintiff’s no-evidence summary judgment motion be denied. Defendant also requests court appointed counsel for the hearing due to his current diminished capacity/ passed incapacity under ADA Title II rule of federal law in protections afforded to those with intellectual disabilities.
Texas UCC Section 9 (Sales) relevant statutes and law:
Sec. 9.708. PERSONS ENTITLED TO FILE INITIAL FINANCING STATEMENT OR CONTINUATION STATEMENT. A person may file an initial financing statement or a continuation statement under this subchapter if:
(1) the secured party of record authorizes the filing; and
(2) the filing is necessary under this subchapter:
(A) to continue the effectiveness of a financing statement filed before the revision takes effect; or
(B) to perfect or continue the perfection of a security interest.
Sec. 9.628. NONLIABILITY AND LIMITATION ON LIABILITY OF SECURED PARTY; LIABILITY OF SECONDARY OBLIGOR. (a) Unless a secured party knows that a person is a debtor or obligor, knows the identity of the person, and knows how to communicate with the person:
(1) the secured party is not liable to the person, or to a secured party or lienholder that has filed a financing statement against the person, for failure to comply with this chapter; and
(2) the secured party's failure to comply with this chapter does not affect the liability of the person for a deficiency.
(b) A secured party is not liable because of its status as secured party:
(1) to a person that is a debtor or obligor, unless the secured party knows:
(A) that the person is a debtor or obligor;
(B) the identity of the person; and
(C) how to communicate with the person; or
(2) to a secured party or lienholder that has filed a financing statement against a person, unless the secured party knows:
(A) that the person is a debtor; and
(B) the identity of the person.
(c) A secured party is not liable to any person, and a person's liability for a deficiency is not affected, because of any act or omission arising out of the secured party's reasonable belief that a transaction is not a consumer-goods transaction or a consumer transaction or that goods are not consumer goods, if the secured party's belief is based on its reasonable reliance on:
(1) a debtor's representation concerning the purpose for which collateral was to be used, acquired, or held; or
(2) an obligor's representation concerning the purpose for which a secured obligation was incurred.
(d) A secured party is not liable to any person under Section 9.625(c)(2) for its failure to comply with Section 9.616.
(e) A secured party is not liable under Section 9.625(c)(2) more than once with respect to any one secured obligation.
Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 414, Sec. 1.01, eff. July 1, 2001.
Reenacted from Acts 1999, 7th Leg., ch. 414, Sec. 3.07 and amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 705, Sec. 23, eff. June 13, 2001.
I swear under penalty of perjury the aforementioned above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and ability under “good faith” under the laws of the State Of Texas.
Thank You,
Barry Mezey
Followers
|
773
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
115804
|
Created
|
12/08/06
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators Soapboxmom |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |