Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
IxCimi - you only flatter yourself if you think we do ................
Are you planning on moving away when Ron Paul wins?
I love the show!
Correct! Ron Paul doesn't have the
favorability that Howeird had. But, the following is cult-like. Enjoy the show!
LOL! Ron Paul and Howard Dean's political statuses are hardly similar.
That's laughable.
IxCimi, Have you ever heard of Howard Dean?
Deja Vu for the emotional cultists.
Ah, well yes, those aren't voters supporting him.
They're spambots with lotsa money.
Here's a surprise.
We are rewriting the way American politics gets done.
And Republicans far and wide want to know HOW he is doing it.
He's become a very popular man among his fellows.
Meaningful money follows after favorability.
Ron Paul's building blocks are backasswards. Money comes after the surge, not to promote a surge.
And Huck don't. So, who is supporting this guy?
Without being a part of the Ron Paul front, you really aren't in a position to say.
What you fear most is that I am correct.
You wouldn't give me or it a second thought if that were not the case.
I'm very familiar with politics..
Factual information, favorability ratings, and I try not to be overemotional. I have a very level head and live in reality. Huckabee has had a surge; you're dreaming that Ron Paul will. His favorability is very low. So far, Ron Paul just has some green from his cult-like following.
If I'm wrong, I'll admit it. If you're wrong, don't go awol with conspiracy theories on us, okay?
You really don't pay attention to politics much, or simply swallow the MSM nonsense without even tasting it for the truth.
Actually, it's fine by me you don't know how huge this Ron Paul think is getting.
Less aware folks like you are the easier it is to avoid complications later.
SWISH!!!!!!!!!!!
Atleast you're being more civil than before.
Maybe we can get you out of that Ron Paul cult, yet? Huckabee isn't a member of the NWO, is he? Or, are all religious people in your book, "freakish"...except Ron Paul.
I'll predict that his demise as a candidate will be followed with blaming of the media and a huge conspiracy of "swift boating" by Republicans, not issues and his ridiculous policies. Emotionalism is a building block of cultist behavior.
OK, ya sure, you betcha!
You might want to change the name of your board.
Maybe something like the "Let's all gang up on IxCimi" board.
But really, I don't mind. Not one bit.
I'm right in my stances.
That makes me a majority of one here.
And without me, it's dead.
You won't win...
No sane person wants isolationist policies with a surrender twist.
That's the Ron Paul revolution... It's nutty. You have to admit, your ideas and attitude are about as nutty as Pecan Pie..LOL. :)
I believe 5 people are ahead of him, and his negative perception far outweighs his positive.
Look Razor. You can think whatever you like, but when we win, remember me.
This thing is more massive than you can even grapple with.
Count on some infantile response.
It's the status quo with the Mayan Calendar scholar. He doesn't (can't) deal in specifics.
In case you haven't noticed,
You can throw money at a pig, but it doesn't make this pig an eagle. The anarchists have some money, but thankfully, the surrender minions are just throwing it away. As I've said before, I'm not in a Fred Thompson cult. He doesn't attract attention. No big deal.... I'm not in a cult.
What... you don't read?
Really brilliant, gp.
Howz about you give us a translation?
Of course you aren't sure what it means ...
It isn't IxCimian logic!
As I said IxCimi - you still can't produce anyone ...
Look, man ... you may speak some truth .... some of the time .. but ...
just because you say/wish/think/claim/hope something is true doesn't mean it is.
And denying something doesn't mean it isn't true.
Don't let your narcissism cloud your brain.
No, that's Bush logic.
I have a problem with anything which subverts American rule of law.
The Patriot Act and many of Bushs "laws" are in direct violation of the Constitution.
Start off with a false and baseless premise and you can bet the rest is equally on a poor footing.
Example?
Brandon Mayfield.
Familiar with the story?
"A bag containing detonating devices, found by Spanish authorities following the Madrid commuter train bombings, had fingerprints that were initially identified by the FBI as belonging to Mayfield ("100% verified"). According to the court documents in Ann Akien's decision, this information was largely "fabricated and concocted by the FBI and DOJ". When the FBI finally sent Brandon's fingerprints to the Spanish authorities, they contested the matching of the finger prints from Brandon Mayfield to the ones associated with the Madrid bombing. Further, the Spanish authorities informed the FBI that they had other suspects who were Moroccan immigrants in the case that were not linked to anyone in the USA. The FBI completely disregarded all of the information from the Spanish authorities, and proceeded to spy on Brandon and his family further.
As was discovered during the court case, even the FBI's own records show that this finger print, despite the sworn testimony of FBI and DOJ agents, was in all reality not an exact match but only one of 20 "similar" prints to the ones that were retrieved from Madrid. Based on that list of people with "similar prints" the FBI launched an extensive investigation in to all 20 individuals using Letters of National Security. The investigation included medical records, financial records, employment records, etc on all 20 people and their families. It was during this time that Brandon Mayfield's name rose to the top of the list most likely simply because he is Muslim. His wife, whom he met in Germany, is an Egyptian national and he converted not long after their marriage.
The FBI arrested Mayfield at his offices in West Slope, an unincorporated suburb of Portland, Oregon, in a manner similar to the then-recent Mike Hawash case, under a material witness warrant rather than under charge, and held him with no access to family and limited access, if any, to legal counsel. The FBI initially refused to inform either Brandon or his family as to why he was being arrested or where he was being held - a direct violation of the Bill of Rights in the US Constitution.
Later, the FBI leaked the nature of the charges to the local media and the family discovered what the charges were by watching the local news. He was at first held at a Multnomah County jail under a false name; he was later transferred to an unidentified location. His family protested that Mayfield had no connection with the bombings, nor had he been to Spain in over 11 years.
The court documents clearly state that Spanish authorities informed the FBI on May 19, 2004 that they arrested an Algerian national named Ouhane Daoud who was an exact match for the fingerprints. Despite this, the FBI refused to release Brandon Mayfield until the story was broken by the international press the next day.
[edit]Release
Following his arrest, Spanish authorities relayed their increasing doubts that the fingerprint on the bag was actually his to the FBI, though these concerns were not communicated to Mayfield's attorneys. On May 19 the Spanish authorities at last announced that the fingerprints actually belonged to an Algerian national, Ouhnane Daoud; Brandon Mayfield was still not released from prison until the international press broke the story the next day - May 20, 2004, [2] although a gag order remained in force for the next few days. By May 25, the case was dismissed by the judge, who ordered the return of seized evidence and unsealing of documents pertaining to his arrest.
The FBI conducted an internal review of Mayfield's arrest and detention, concluding that although he was not arrested solely due to his religious beliefs, they may have contributed to investigator's failure to take into account the Spanish concerns over fingerprint identification.[1] The FBI issued a press release announcing the report's conclusion that they had not misused the Patriot Act in the investigation.[2] Civil libertarians and the ACLU nonetheless consider Mayfield's detention a misuse of the material witness statute.[3]
Although the FBI afterwards apologized for their acts, Mayfield has filed several lawsuits over this invasion of his privacy. One sought to force the government to return or destroy copies of items seized from his home. Another, which was argued before U.S. District Court Judge Ann Aiken on July 15, 2005, challenged the law which was used against him as unconstitutional. The Federal Government filed several motions to have Mayfield's case dismissed as a matter of national security, or national secrets, but these were denied by Judge Aiken.
The case was heard by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Among the issues on appeal, are whether materials removed from Mayfield's house, including DNA samples taken from his family's personal toothbrushes, are to be destroyed or preserved. The Federal Government has assumed the position that materials must be preserved so that they can be referred to, if more lawsuits are brought in the future.
On November 29, 2006, the U.S. government settled part of the lawsuit with Mayfield for a reported 2 million dollars. The United States government issued a formal apology to Mayfield as part of the settlement. The settlement allowed Mayfield to pursue a legal challenge against the Patriot Act.[4] The FBI was also cleared of wrongdoing in an earlier internal investigation.
On September 26, 2007, two provisions of the U.S. Patriot Act were declared unconstitutional. Finding in Mayfield's favor, U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken ruled that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, as amended by the Patriot Act, "now permits the executive branch of government to conduct surveillance and searches of American citizens without satisfying the probable cause requirements of the Fourth Amendment," which violates the Constitution of the United States.[5]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandon_Mayfield
Not sure what that means, but sorry pal.
I'm a lock.
four words, IxCimi, to bring you to reality...
Retirement Fund
Howard Dean ...
IxCimi - you've been complaining about the Patriot Act since day one ... and I've been trying to get you to cite a real example whwere anyone who is conducting themselves within the law has lost a cotton-picking thing, or has suffered from it in any way. Nothing but uncomfirmable anecdotes. And you still can't ....
Now there's some IxCimian logic, alright!
Now about whom have I heard you say that before?
If you ain't against it, you must be for it.
You know, Bush logic.
No matter!
You and I know the MSM isn't for this.
It challenges the very root of their authority.
And I say, "BY GOD,... GOOD!!!!!!!"
All the illegal executive orders and legislation rescinded.
The Patriot Act, Homeland Security, Military Commissions Act, telecommunications intrusions in to private American lives, National ID card, RFID chipped Passports, the Amero/NAU which WAS confirmed by ex-Presidente Vicente Fox, and the list goes on.... POOF! Gone in a moment....
And you by your ridicule who supports all that?
LOL!
You think you are going to be one of those who benefits from the destruction of your nation?
Hell, when the time comes you be alone out there with your ass hangin' out, wondering what to do.
according to usa DAILY.....hardly a bastion of journalistic pride
Ohhhh chunga darling!
Ron Paul is now GOP frontrunner.
http://www.usadaily.com/article.cfm?articleID=202092
(excerpted text)
"18.2 million dollars in this quarter from over 120,000 donors. Put in perspective media darling Mike Huckabee’s struggling campaign has raised only 1.2 million dollars this month. Paul’s campaign if it hits 20 million by New Year’s Eve has a shot at raising more cash than Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama as well in the fourth quarter."
P.S. Tell our friendly naysayer to go pound sand.
#msg-25394241
Whoooo boy, am I gonna have a good time come Nov 5th...
I'm really ready for a great laugh ; )
That prior post was ALL Ron Paul related.
He's the only one stand between you and ruin.
100% worth, plus some to the local and non-campaign national efforts.
IxCimi - thought we were talking about Paul and his chances ...
What brought on the 'I'm a superior patriot with superior intelligence' lecture?
How much have you contributed to the guy in which you beleive 100%?
Last chance corral, ol' CFR pal.
You are being sold out. Your nation undermined.
It's now or never.
The Amero is on it's way with any other of your political wackoids.
I know you don't believe me, and why should you?
But really, you'll "get it" sooner or later.
I'm thinkin' 2008 will make you sit up and go WTF.
It all seems fine now, but wait till they feel they have it locked down.
And when the sheit hits the fan, you won't be in the right clique.
You'll be on your own.
Sorry .......... but you continue to chisel away your own credibility ....
Not that I have any real favorite among the front-runners ... because any of them will not represent my values (which, I like to think, are better than the vast majority of those of the 'professional politicians' we have today).... but one of them will get the nod from the party...
How much have YOU contributed to Mr. Paul's retirement fund .... er..... campaign fund?
IxCIMI - you have to be in the race ... before you can win.
You really believe this guy can capture the Republican nomination?
Pretty cynical.
More like money to do the vote counts from all the fraud.
We'll win.
IxCimi -
All I can say is ..........
"War Chest" = "Retirement Fund" .........
Yep, that Paul is one intelligent dude alright!
Are you kidding?
Haven't you seen his 4Q haul so far?
18.5 MILLION dollars.
And to a growing number, he is the ONLY pertinent candidate in 2007.
When I can find the specific article I'm looking for, I'll send it to you.
Meanwhile....
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/12/ron-paul-for-th.html
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/12/ron-paul-suppor.html
Plus,... check out your Alexa.com campaign averages.
All I can say is WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
We ARE #1!!!!!!!!!!!!
paul doing well?, by what measure? he dosen't even rate a mention here
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/
Sorry you aren't up to the task.
Ron Paul sure seems to be going rather well.
How's Freddie doing?
Great "concrete" explanation, IxCimi!
Just as irrelevant as ever!
Came before the Torah and it's not a religious tome.
Of course, the most ancient Torah looks nothing like Old Testament of today.
The Jews originated from a proto-Hindu monotheist priesthood out of Afghanistan called the Calani. Much like the Amenhotep's monotheist Egypt.
"In his History of the Jews, the Jewish scholar and theologian Flavius Josephus (37 - 100 A.D.), wrote that the Greek philosopher Aristotle had said: "...These Jews are derived from the Indian philosophers; they are named by the Indians Calani." (Book I:22.)"
And if you want to get right down to it, they all come from one root source.
The deepest, most secret layer of cultural transmitters all know this.
At the outer levels, some have stayed truer to form.
Others have strayed mightily.
and explain to me how that is any more valid the the book of the jews
What I am saying here has nothing to do with Ron Paul.
Followers
|
3
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
406
|
Created
|
05/03/07
|
Type
|
Premium
|
Moderators iamshazzam chunga1 |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |