Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
True - probably the big difference between this and other shells, and why San Global may have picked this one.
Remember, this is also important. This, in its past, was PCAOB audited.
That is a good question. What we are now waiting for is the actual business model and then the company will release various forms mainly Form4 on insiders. This usually will accompany the preferred issues and other pertinent doc to establish the direct ownerships breakdown. This will encompass the board of directors and others. When this is finalized and the legal aspect of the breakdown the company can then detail the share structure as with respect to reduction.
Have a good day
varok
Interesting....didn't realize that. We shall see. Funny name for the company if that's the case. Maybe something just gets lost in the translation. I know that issue may have been addressed with stervc's post #33750.
If we have the right guy, the company he owns is known as the Fedex of China. He is in the delivery biz, and makes sense we are seeing connection to an import export type operation. This is how big this could be.
If they have assets, giving 20% of the company to a bunch of OTC degenerates is more than generous and borders on insane charity.
Thank you Varok.
In your experience, when you have seen OS's increased substantially in an effort to avert a hostile takeover, have you seen a subsequent reduction in shares later down the line when the threat passes? If so, what would make the threat go away, a significant rise in share price?
Good explanation for the idiots coming on here that are clueless about share structures.
Nice post Varok, appreciated
Good morning,
Allow me to make an observation on the share structure. I realize folks will do their DD and upon the noticed of the really, and it is large, the O/S of 44B. Man that is a real looker when I first noticed it. However, upon further into it and my years in M/A makes sense as well as who is behind this.
Just earlier in the month the share structure was 8B O/S and then a total acquisition of increasing the A/S to 50B and O/S to 44B on the surface may seem to many as in WTF!.
Well folks, it really isn't so bad since the majority or about 80% is restricted that puts these shares out of reach. See, many times when a large concern comes in and initiated takeover like we see here is important to understand that the reason for such a mechanism with the share structure is to apply an insurance safety net known as a mechanism against 'Greenmailing'. Knowing the man behind this will certainly attract Folks to conduct an assertive effort through backdoor applications into a hostile takeover. This is simply a preventive mechanism.
I believe the announcement coming on what entails the merger will be so huge and I'm balancing this with the share structure that it may be so significant that the share structure is a moot point for our ROI.
In the coming weeks we will have an interesting ride through this process.
I consider this in the range of .0005 to .0008 as a nice buying opportunity.
Have a good day.
varok
.
Someone smacking that bid.
$$$$$ MASSIVE SLAPS!!!! $$$$$ -CHEERS!
2 Billion in volume in 2 days so far. Looks like people are loading this to me. As always the insiders load to the gills before retail knows the exact details of the merger. I hope it is the same Billionaire that the prior poster suggest is taking over.
Thanks, great info and opinion.
Stalled out now. Need some news to get'er movin!
Excellent - sounds like we may be in good hands here. I like to watch the daily proceedings like everyone else, but won't concern myself too much with it. Let's see where we are by the end of the year.
To comment on your synopsis about Wang Wei is correct.
He is a very closed mouth individual that has avoided outside money into his ventures and appears things have changed. His large ef- express that he founded was on private monies business he has stated. He is a no-nonsense visionary. He will attract outside sources; His name is alone a huge get.
Have a good day
varok
And now the dump at .0005 followed back up to .0006 and an ask size bigger than before. Classic PLPL.
Grabbed a few, monster volume since friday
Ask size keeps refilling with volume. Same old same old.
Thank you for this post. "Delivery" might explain some of the Twitterverse theories that the company would be in importing/exporting too, with exporting constituting their delivery. If that were the case, I wonder what type of exports we're talking about? It might not matter, so long as there was a big market in that area, but just wondering out of curiosity. As others have pointed out, a PR explaining a bit more about the company would be great, but we're on their time schedule and that's ok.
alstocks, here with PLPL...
I have always respected you as we are in another stock together to where I know you are not a basher. I wasn't going to post here because I didn't want to attract the bashers here that usually stalk me from time to time to clog up the forums with their usual BS false claims about how I'm behind everything in the market pumping and dumping. When I saw you post here, I figured I should respond to you publicly.
I've been trying to see if this Wang Wei is the same guy that is listed within the company's registration that's coming in here in a few places and within OTC Markets. Some spots have Song Wei Wang instead of Wang, Sung-Wei, but I know they are referring to the same person. Some places, like this old article in 2017 referring to the third richest man in China that was worth over $23 Billion, just says Wang Wei:
https://money.com/wang-wei-delivery-man-richest-billionaire-china-ef-express/
Within that article, instead of the word "catering" that's within the OTC Markets filings, they used the word "delivery" within that article of which could be considered synonymous with each other. I'm doing some more digging to try to confirm, but I haven't been able to confirm if it's the same guy or not. Maybe someone else can dig a little deeper than what I can to see if this is our guy that is listed for owning San Global Dining, Ltd. aka Sanjian Capital Co., Ltd., the Chinese name for the company that's coming into PLPL per their filings within OTC Markets.
The new management bought the preferred and 80% of the OS. In my opinion, you don't buy that huge amount of billions of shares that they bought unless you have a huge purpose. That would lead one to believe that they must believe them to have huge worth. There are a few other reasons as to why something pretty good could be happening here. I think if you peruse through the forum, you would read some of them.
v/r
Sterling
PLPL, why did they hire 2 Merger & Acquisition specialists? I have never seen 2 people used. Actually you normally just see the old Shell owner/CEO/Lawyer stay on and help. Why so many people working on this Merger? Must be larger then people think. Tad did say he would go out in in big bang. I guess this is what he meant.
Some info about the new company sure would be nice. Without some decent data, all the volume just brigs out the cockroaches.
Aaaaand we're off to the races!
Thanks for posting at the same time as you normally do with the same nonsense as usual. Very original.
Classic stupidity from one of the more deranged sheep
44 billion OS. Lmao. This is a great example of the stupidity that lives in our society. This is exactly what the governments want, blind and dumber people to walk our streets. Keto em stupid, spike their food to make them stupid and then they can sell them scams
I think "moron" may be too generous a description.
Where did I say it was low? You are saying that all shares are in the tradeable float. That is not the case. Being a moron, I would expect you not to understand what restricted shares are. The same 8B shares are there that are not restricted and tradeable. Do you also need me to teach you how to spell C-A-T? Oops, just did. That was a freebie too.
Any stocks have a buyer in one single transaction 120 mil will start a rally for sure. Plpl have back to back hit .0003 and another .0004 on Friday. It brings a lot of eyes on plpl Last week. Those two or three front loaders at .0003 and .0004 succeed running plpl! Congrat to them if they still hold
That's the right building. Address is in quarterly report on OTC markets website. New owners own 80% of the common shares 80%
Looks like the real deal here plus new owners have 80% of the common shares looks like very little debt left according to quarterly
You do know it takes 120 million shares for that right??
$$$$$ MASSIVE FOMO !!!! $$$$$ -Good Luck Everyone!
How is it proven? Its a new owner.
Proven scam!!!!!!! Nothing is going to happen here other than dilution!!!!!pumping this scam is a crime
You should have a shame to even post anything positive here!!!!!
NO BID is what you will get here, 8B shares free to trade!
Another 36B is coming here
Huge dilution scam!!!!
8B shares tradable! 36B shares to be dumped !!!
What ? Can you please post a link where it shows this scam has very low SS?
0008 open Monday I guess
It looks that way. The mass damper design is pretty sweet in that building.
I’m guessing that San Global Dining’s headquarters would be in Taipei 101? No.7 Sec. 5 on Xinyi Road is a match to that building. If it is, it’s the world’s 11th tallest building, and the elevators that go 89 floors in 37 seconds are eerily reminiscent to the Twin Towers and One World Trade. I can’t confirm this is the case, and maybe it makes no difference, but it looks like the office space there wouldn’t be cheap…
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taipei_101
PLPL found its place on the brokers' liquidation list alongside other OTC stocks. Remember the four-page list of OTC stocks we had until September 30, 2021, to sell off?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169238494
I'd like to add a small correction to your comment. The challenge with the OTC arises when it becomes too organized and too many individuals begin profiting excessively. This is why the SEC implemented Rule 15c2-11. The OTC started becoming a lucrative opportunity for small investors. For instance, buying a million shares of PLPL at $0.0005 and selling them at $0.006 results in a 1100% increase. I started trading in the OTC, and as long as money was being lost in these high-risk stocks, the SEC didn't intervene. However, the issue arose when individuals started making millions in the OTC faster than in other exchanges.
In a new report from Wintermute, the market maker and liquidity provider, said that its over-the-counter (OTC) volume was up 400% throughout the year as volumes moved off-exchanges.
Essentially, the OTC drew the SEC's attention. It's akin to a casino: if a particular table sees too many winners, does the casino allow it to continue unchanged?
There is a lot of speculation, most definitely. I just know from fellow traders it is an import / Export, with supposedly big deals.
Maybe. John Park has major issues with his previous businesses being sued for millions in non payments for debt. His newer deals are questionable, as he has zero background with deals he pumps. Caution flag up on that one.
Followers
|
432
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
34998
|
Created
|
07/28/06
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators price_and_volume bri123 |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |