ParkerVision Inc (PRKR)

[StockRoomBully]

Folks why would Apple point finger at Qualcom? Then turn to intel??

"JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESSWIRE / July 17, 2019 / ParkerVision, Inc. (PRKR) announced today that the District Court in the Middle District of Florida issued an order denying Apple’s motion for summary judgment in ParkerVision’s pending patent litigation against Qualcomm and Apple in Jacksonville, Florida. Apple’s motion sought to limit the liability for damages solely to Qualcomm. In addition, the court issued its claim construction (Markman) order, in which the Court adopted ParkerVision's proposed construction for two terms and the "plain and ordinary meaning" on the remaining terms. These decisions pave the way for a jury trial in this case, and a proposed trial schedule is required to be submitted by the parties by July 30, 2019.

In order words @appl want $Qcom to pay up

Then there's more



Court Denies Qualcomm’s Attempt to Limit Asserted Claims

JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA / ACCESSWIRE / July 24, 2019 / ParkerVision, Inc. (PRKR), announced today that the District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted ParkerVision’s proposed selection of patent claims from four asserted patents and denied Qualcomm’s request to limit the claims and patents, including claims that survived Qualcomm’s validity challenges through Inter Partes Review (“IPR”).

The court also agreed that ParkerVision may elect to pursue accused products that were at issue at the time the case was stayed, as well as new products that were released by Qualcomm during the pendency of the stay. This decision from the court comes following an oral hearing held May 22, 2019."

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/orlando-district-court-paves-way-110000412.html

[StockRoomBully]

Apple pays $1 billion for Intel unit in push for chip independence


Modem chips connect devices like the iPhone to wireless data networks, but Apple has always relied on outside suppliers for the part. Intel positioned itself as the sole source of iPhone modem chips over the past year after Apple got into a prolonged legal fight with previous supplier Qualcomm Inc over Qualcomm patent licensing practices."

"Cupertino, California-based Apple reached a surprise settlement in April that called for the iPhone to once again use Qualcomm modem chips. Within hours, Intel said it would quit the smartphone modem business."



See folks no coincidence. See DD $appl points the finger solely at Qualcom


JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA / ACCESSWIRE / July 24, 2019 / ParkerVision, Inc. (PRKR), announced today that the District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted ParkerVision’s proposed selection of patent claims from four asserted patents and denied Qualcomm’s request to limit the claims and patents, including claims that survived Qualcomm’s validity challenges through Inter Partes Review (“IPR”). The court also agreed that ParkerVision may elect to pursue accused products that were at issue at the time the case was stayed, as well as new products that were released by Qualcomm during the pendency of the stay. This decision from the court comes following an oral hearing held May 22, 2019."



Jacksonville District Court Denies Apple's Motion for Summary Judgment and Issues Markman Oder
ACCESSWIRE
ACCESSWIREJuly 17, 2019, 12:45 PM UTC

"Apple’s motion sought to limit the liability for damages solely to Qualcomm."


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-intel-divestiture-apple-idUSKCN1UK2X3


https://finance.yahoo.com/news/orlando-district-court-paves-way-110000412.html

[StockRoomBully]

Ham see DD. Let hope this time around $PRKR get the number they rightfully deserved


Hickman, however, estimates the potential award at $800 million to $1 billion.

He said that ParkerVision is looking for 2 percent of the price of chips sold by Qualcomm, allegedly using ParkerVision's patented technology, going back to 2006. If Qualcomm sold 2 billion of those chips at $25 each, that would mean $1 billion.

In terms of ParkerVision's stock, Hickman estimates that a victory in court could translate into as much as $18.65 per share in value.


https://www.jaxdailyrecord.com/article/parkervision-still-could-get-1-billion?amp

[Hammtastic]

Yep, just a waiting game now!

[StockRoomBully]

"These decisions pave the way for a jury trial in this case, and a proposed trial schedule is required to be submitted by the parties by July 30, 2019."

You got time to load. I know folks dont want to come and chitchat but no matter this thing gonna settle one way or another.

$Prkr just recently added Freeh -this all looks like settlement big time. Imo

"Louis Freeh and Freeh Sporkin & Sullivan LLP Join ParkerVision Litigation Team


ACCESSWIREJune 11, 2019, 12:30 PM UTC

JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESSWIRE / June 11, 2019 / ParkerVision, Inc. (PRKR) announced today that the Honorable Louis J. Freeh and Freeh Sporkin & Sullivan (FSS) have joined ParkerVision's litigation team. Mr. Freeh will be involved in a wide range of activities that include past ParkerVision litigations, current on-going actions, and potential future litigations."

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/louis-freeh-freeh-sporkin-sullivan-123000219.html

[Hammtastic]

I believe Apple, HTC and Qualcomm will settle before the trial date that is yet to be set.

The only thing holding this back from skyrocketing to the moon is not knowing the trial schedule.

When that trial schedule comes out I believe this will skyrocket but all 3 companies will take their time to settle on a settlement before the trial date. WHEN they do settle, this will be the biggest play of the year, or biggest play of next year, depending on when the trial date is.

[StockRoomBully]

Ham

What your opinion Based on all the DD and apple now that they're interested in Intel chips and backing away from qualcom 940 radio frequency patent

See below quotes:

"Apple’s motion sought to limit the liability for damages solely to Qualcomm."

"In addition, the court issued its claim construction (Markman) order, in which the Court adopted ParkerVision's proposed construction for two terms and the "plain and ordinary meaning" on the remaining terms. These decisions pave the way for a jury trial in this case, and a proposed trial schedule is required to be submitted by the parties by July 30, 2019."


"District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted ParkerVision’s proposed selection of patent claims from four asserted patents and denied Qualcomm’s request to limit the claims and patents, including claims that survived Qualcomm’s validity challenges through Inter Partes Review (“IPR”). The court also agreed that ParkerVision may elect to pursue accused products that were at issue at the time the case was stayed, as well as new products that were released by Qualcomm during the pendency of the stay. This decision from the court comes following an oral hearing held May 22, 2019.


THIS IS BIG NEWS

[Hammtastic]

Hopefully after my funds settle so I can add more ??.
You guys should checkout AGGG too. They are on a nice run right now, projected to hit atleast $10.

Hopefully this one doesn’t go too high before I can add more.

[StockRoomBully]

Wallstreet access back on the bid and ask at $100

[StockRoomBully]

Pot, ham, whyt what all think about this? Settlement soon?. Noticed apple in talk to take over intel chips.

[pottsville]

I'm running with this for a while

[Hammtastic]

Geez Luiz this shot up. Anybody know what a 424B3 leads to?

[whytestocks]

News: $PRKR Orlando District Court Paves Way for ParkerVision Infringement Case to Proceed Against Qualcomm and HTC

Court Denies Qualcomm’s Attempt to Limit Asserted Claims JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA / ACCESSWIRE / July 24, 2019 / ParkerVision, Inc. (OTCQB: PRKR), announced today that the District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted ParkerVision’s proposed selecti...

Got this from Orlando District Court Paves Way for ParkerVision Infringement Case to Proceed Against Qualcomm and HTC

[StockRoomBully]

Hickman, however, estimates the potential award at $800 million to $1 billion.

He said that ParkerVision is looking for 2 percent of the price of chips sold by Qualcomm, allegedly using ParkerVision's patented technology, going back to 2006. If Qualcomm sold 2 billion of those chips at $25 each, that would mean $1 billion.

In terms of ParkerVision's stock, Hickman estimates that a victory in court could translate into as much as $18.65 per share in value.


https://www.jaxdailyrecord.com/article/parkervision-still-could-get-1-billion?amp

[StockRoomBully]

ParkerVision: Potential Damage Award = $5 Billion, 5x Prior Award Plus 10 Years Future Royalties. Price Target = $50
May 5, 2014 11:39 AMParkerVision, Inc. (PRKR)QCOM
Summary
Expected revenue of $100 million per year from current lawsuit.
Judge Dalton upholding prior jury verdict plus awarding increased royalty.
ParkerVision recently filed second complaint, using Qualcomm's litigation tactics against them. Potential award of $400 million +.
Tremendous business opportunity with 3LP and other future partners.
No need for further financing so no stock dilution.

[StockRoomBully]

Motion summary denied apple turn their attention to Intel. not a coincidence folks. Qualcom Radio Frequncy 940 patent parkervision is a big problem for apple.

IF YOU FOUND THIS GEM GOOD LUCK TO YOU>

in 24hrs APPLE talking intel chip takeover over $1 billion

[StockRoomBully]

Apple giving Qualcom the finger and blame Qualcom for 940 patent
apple no longer want to use Qualcom chips no longer. Parkervision legal team is too heavy to mess with.

see dates.. not a coincidence apple buying patent from intel. some sort of PR soon folks. look at Wall street access on the bid for the first time today and ask at $100 dollars

Apple is in the final stages of negotiations to buy the bulk of Intel's modem chip business, The Wall Street Journal reports. The Journal says the deal, valued at $1 billion or more, could be finalized in the next week. The deal would involve the transfer of talent as well as modem-related patents.

FURTHER READING
Apple and Qualcomm settle patent fight after one day in court
But Intel has struggled to gain traction. That's partly because Qualcomm negotiated restrictive contracts with potential Intel customers that effectively blocked them from considering a second supplier. After Apple began shipping iPhones with Intel chips inside them in 2016, Qualcomm declared war on Apple, suing for patent infringement and eventually refusing to supply chips for new iPhone models—making Apple dependent on Intel for those chips.


Making its own modems could have technical benefits for Apple, allowing the company to more tightly integrate its modem chips with other iPhone components. It could also protect Apple in case an appeals court overturns the May antitrust ruling against Qualcomm. If that happens, we can expect Qualcomm to once again use aggressive licensing and litigation techniques to extract large royalty payments from customers, so it would be in Apple's interest to be able to manufacture its own wireless chips.

Correction: Intel bought Infineon's wireless division in 2011, not the whole company.


JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESSWIRE / July 17, 2019 / ParkerVision, Inc. (PRKR) announced today that the District Court in the Middle District of Florida issued an order denying Apple’s motion for summary judgment in ParkerVision’s pending patent litigation against Qualcomm and Apple in Jacksonville, Florida. Apple’s motion sought to limit the liability for damages solely to Qualcomm.



PARKERVISION, INC. v. QUALCOMM INC. 3

mation of sound waves—have low frequencies, and there-
fore low energy, making them difficult to transmit wire-
lessly through the air. Up-converting these frequencies to
higher-frequency signals, such as radio frequency (“RF”)
signals, allows the signal—and, critically, the information
contained therein—to be more efficiently transmitted to a
receiver. Id. col. 13, l. 53–col. 14, l. 6.

A. The ’940 Patent
ParkerVision owns the ’940 patent, titled “Method
and System for Frequency Up-Conversion.” The inven-
tions of the ’940 patent generally relate to telecommunica-
tions devices, such as cellular phones, in which low-
frequency electromagnetic signals are “up-converted” to
higher-frequency signals by various means. ’940 patent,
col. 1, ll. 23–24; id. col. 1, ll. 46–48. “Baseband” signals—
electromagnetic signals that encode the relevant infor-




Intel to Auction Off Modem IP and Patents
Tuesday June 25, 2019 1:41 pm PDT by Juli Clover
Intel is planning to auction off its portfolio of patents related to cellular wireless connectivity, according to a new report from IAM.

Intel's upcoming auction follows the company's April decision to exit the 5G smartphone modem business. Intel stopped work on 5G modem technology after Apple and Qualcomm reached a settlement and a supply agreement that will see Qualcomm providing 5G modem chips for future iPhones.


Antitrust Lawsuit Against Qualcomm Is Unjust Government Overreach
Diane Katz / @Dianeskatz / June 24, 2019 /
The company supplied chipsets and other wireless network elements for hundreds of millions of Apple iPhones from 2011 to 2017, among others. The companies’ association generated sizable profits for both, as well as protracted litigation.

The payday wasn't enough, and ParkerVision may have more plans for its patents.
JOE MULLIN - 10/25/2013, 3:45 PM

Nine-digit verdicts don't happen every day. A $173 million windfall—especially when no other revenue sources seem forthcoming—would have most investors in a small company like ParkerVision jumping up and down. But that didn't happen. "Were Investors Set Up To Fail?" asked one writer on investment site SeekingAlpha. He quotes a JP Morgan Chase analyst telling clients that just a week ago, ParkerVision was in a position to win up to $2 billion.


https://www.jacksonville.com/article/20131024/NEWS/801244357

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-17/apple-legal-surrender-is-a-blow-for-its-supply-chain-strategy

https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4534871/parkervision-inc-v-qualcomm-incorporated/

[StockRoomBully]

Folks we may have settle soon. Incoming dd

[StockRoomBully]

The "Summary Judgment Premium$$ "

Critics focus on the grants of a motion for summary judgment and
wrongly fail to assess a potentially efficient denial of summary
judgment.13 However, attention must be given to denials of summary
judgment in order to fully appreciate the positive impact of Rule 56.

The motion is often denied, and, when this occurs, the case becomes
more expensive to settle. In a very real sense, a summary judgment
premium arises at the time a Rule 56 motion is denied. When a motion
for summary judgment is denied, the settlement value of a claim
increases. This dynamic benefits the nonmovant, normally the plaintiff,and should be more fully appreciated.

The Summary Judgment Premium Deters Frivolous Motions

The possibility of denial of the summary judgment motion and the
creation of a summary judgment premium play a valuable role in
deterring the filing of frivolous summary judgment motions. Filing the
motion activates the movant's risk of triggering a settlement premium.
Awareness of this possibility serves a useful function of deterring
frivolous costs.

https://lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=luclj

[StockRoomBully]

Settlement closer than you think

SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Once discovery is over, the next stop is summary judgment, and it’s an important stop. Either party—plaintiff or defendant—can ask the judge to grant it summary judgement, and a win on summary judgment means a win in the lawsuit. Unlike a motion to dismiss, summary judgment does permit the parties to dispute the facts alleged in the complaint. But a judge grants summary judgment only when he or she finds that there’s no material dispute about the essential facts alleged. In colloquial terms, then, a party moving for summary judgment is arguing, in essence, that the evidence is all so obviously and completely in its favor that there’s no need to convene a jury to decide the case. Just being mostly right is not good enough here—the judge will only grant this motion when he or she thinks that there is basically no real evidence that contradicts the winning party’s position.

As with the motion to dismiss, Summary judgment provides a key opportunity for settlement. When the motion has been completed but not yet ruled on, the parties are in the best position yet to gauge their chances of success and try to find common ground with their adversary. Resolution of summary judgment also often drives settlement talks, since, unless a party prevails on summary judgment, the upshot is that they’re headed to trial.


https://constructionexec.com/article/litigation-and-settlement-basics-the-litigation-lifecycle
TRIAL

The most well-known part of the litigation process is also a part rarely used: trial. Since there are so many opportunities for a case to resolve or settle before trial, and because trial is inherently unpredictable, most cases never make it this far. But when they do, the goal at trial in most (though not all) business litigation is to be at least 51 percent right. That’s because, unlike at summary judgment, trial victory is generally determined by who has “the preponderance of the evidence” on its side, even if there remain disputed facts. Trial is a great motivator for settlement, since not only is it expensive and unpredictable, but it also brings decision makers into close proximity with each other. It is not uncommon for parties to talk (and complete) settlement even as trial itself goes on.

[StockRoomBully]

SEE FOLKS THE OUTCOME ONCE AGAIN

Bid to Flip Apple Ruling Seeks to Check Patent Court’s Power
Posted July 15, 2019, 4:45 AM
By Ian Lopez

Apple waived a hearing to settle the meaning of “particular,” known as claim construction. They instead brought expert witnesses to their 2015 trial to testify about how they interpreted the plain-and-ordinary meaning of patent language involving the term. A U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin jury found that Apple committed literal infringement of the patent.

The district court awarded WARF $234 million in damages. ..After trial, the district court denied Apple’s follow-up attempt to get a JMOL, or judgment as a matter of law, of no literal infringement.

The court later upped the award to about $506 million for continued infringement.

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/bid-to-flip-apple-ruling-seeks-to-check-patent-courts-power

[StockRoomBully]

Listen carefully at 2:00 minutes and see below PR HIGHLIGHTS IN RED.

WATCH VIDEO

NOW SCARTCH YA HEAD. TAKE A DEEP BREATH. HHHM

JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESSWIRE / July 17, 2019 / ParkerVision, Inc. (PRKR) announced today that the District Court in the Middle District of Florida issued an order denying Apple’s motion for summary judgment in ParkerVision’s pending patent litigation against Qualcomm and Apple in Jacksonville, Florida. Apple’s motion sought to limit the liability for damages solely to Qualcomm. In addition, [color=red] the court issued its claim construction (Markman) order, in which the Court adopted ParkerVision's proposed construction for two terms and the "plain and ordinary meaning" on the remaining terms.[/color]

These decisions pave the way for a jury trial in this case, and a proposed trial schedule is required to be submitted by the parties by July 30, 2019.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jacksonville-district-court-denies-apples-124500789.html

[StockRoomBully]

I AM OFFICIALLY ON-BOARD. WAITING FOR THE FOLKS TO FIND THIS GEM.

[StockRoomBully]

Folks compensation incoming regardless

Ceo qoute
"why it is so critically important, thus enabling a well-informed jury to make a determination regarding fair compensation."

Prkr worth more than .13 cents.. Yes Folks scratch ya head. Take a deep breath.

[StockRoomBully]

Folks. Louis J. Freeh
Former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

MAKE SENSE NOW.

[StockRoomBully]

Much respect sir. I also stumbled on it over at otc news feed. Read all the post here and decided to do my DD and was amazed that this gem got to here (delisted)only because of litigation matters. Once traded $500 back in 2000. Was top 50 tech company along side QCom And many others.

This is just too good. This discover is just bigly. Sumarry denied at this point could go to settlement before trial schedule date July 30th. Qcom sued Apple and they demaned $1.41 per phone . smh.


Extreamly happy$$!

[StockRoomBully]

FOLKS SEE WHOS ON $PRKR LEGAL TEAM. Louis Freeh and Freeh Sporkin & Sullivan LLP Join ParkerVision Litigation Team


THIS IS GETTING INTERESTING.

JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESSWIRE / June 11, 2019 / ParkerVision, Inc. (PRKR) announced today that the Honorable Louis J. Freeh and Freeh Sporkin & Sullivan (FSS) have joined ParkerVision's litigation team.

Mr. Freeh will be involved in a wide range of activities that include past ParkerVision litigations, current on-going actions, and potential future litigations.

KEY WORD$ "PAST LITIGATIONS" "CURRENT ON_GOING ACTIONS, AND POTENTIAL FUTURE LITIGATIONS"

ParkerVision Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey Parker commented, "We welcome the breadth of experience in the judicial, prosecutorial, investigative and corporate domains that Mr. Freeh and his team bring to our enforcement actions. FSS adds a diversity of skill sets, backed by the exceptional achievements of its leadership, to the ParkerVision litigation team."

https://finance.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/louis-freeh-freeh-sporkin-sullivan-123000219.html

[Hammtastic]

I’m with ya! Randomly stumbled across this gem literally the day the news came out. This looks promising.

Statistics show once motion for summary judgement is denied, settlements double to an average of $120million!

I also read from a previous press release that the court denied only 2 claims out of the 18 that were submitted!

Feeling very fortunate to have stumbled across this gem before everyone else gets here!

[StockRoomBully]

EagleEye. See PR

"JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESSWIRE / July 17, 2019 / ParkerVision, Inc. (PRKR) announced today that the District Court in the Middle District of Florida issued an order denying Apple’s motion for summary judgment in ParkerVision’s pending patent litigation against Qualcomm and Apple in Jacksonville, Florida. Apple’s motion sought to limit the liability for damages solely to Qualcomm.

In addition, the court issued its claim construction (Markman) order, in which the Court adopted ParkerVision's proposed construction for two terms and the "plain and ordinary meaning" on the remaining terms.

These decisions pave the way for a jury trial in this case, and a proposed trial schedule is required to be submitted by the parties by July 30, 2019."

Aslo see DD video on Summary of Judgement Plaintiff side.

Any further Q can learn from DD vid.

THIS IS BIG NEWS! IM HANGING OUT HERE ALL ALONE. ITS ALL GOOD NP

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jacksonville-district-court-denies-apples-124500789.html

[StockRoomBully]

FOLKS in the know. LOAD-UP BEFORE IT BLOW-UP imo. Not many news outlet knows. Be fortunate that you know.

Qoute: CEO

"Mr. Parker continued, “We are pleased that after years of motions by the defendants which delayed a decision based on the merits of this case, our infringement allegations against Apple and Qualcomm are now headed for trial. In our opinion, Qualcomm and Apple have been enjoying all the benefits of our technology - a technology in which we invested tens of millions to develop and patent -- without compensating us for it."


https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jacksonville-district-court-denies-apples-124500789.html

[eageleye]

What is the significance of July 30th? You mentioned that in a previous post.

[StockRoomBully]

What Are Patent Plays?

Patent plays are companies owning patents, either on products/services developed in-house or acquired to be part of a patent portfolio. These patents are potential gold mines, as they could fetch billions of dollars through litigation, licensing or outright sale.


https://finance.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/guide-patent-play-exposure-003435315.html

[StockRoomBully]

$1.41 per phone settlement . just hypothetical. What if scenario.

Yearly chart Apple

In the 2017 fiscal year, Apple sold 216.76 million iPhones.

In entire 2018, 217.72 million iPhones were shipped worldwide

https://www.statista.com/statistics/276306/global-apple-iphone-sales-since-fiscal-year-2007/

[StockRoomBully]

See how much PARKERVISION WORTH$$$$$$

Use for reference folks most recent lawsuit


Apple Violated 3 Qualcomm Patents, Jury Finds

March 15, 2019
Qualcomm won a legal victory against Apple on Friday when a federal jury in San Diego found that Apple owed the mobile phone chip supplier about $31 million for infringing on three of its patents.

Qualcomm sued Apple last year, accusing it of violating patents related to improving mobile phones’ battery life.

During an eight-day trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Qualcomm asked the jury to award it unpaid patent royalties of up to $1.41 per iPhone that violated the patents.

“The technologies invented by Qualcomm and others are what made it possible for Apple to enter the market and become so successful so quickly,” Don Rosenberg, Qualcomm’s general counsel, said in a statement.

The verdict on Friday could come into play in that case because it puts a per-phone dollar figure on some of Qualcomm’s intellectual property. Qualcomm’s patent licensing model relies on charging phone makers a cut of the selling price of the phone, a practice Apple has called unfair and illegal.

SO FOLKS FOR THOSE WHO FOUND THIS GEM. PARKERVISION MAY OR MAY NOT GO TO TRIAL THEYMAY SETTLE IF NOT THE JUDGE GOT ENOUGH MATERIAL TO SEND THIS TO TRIAL.


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/15/technology/apple-qualcomm-patents-trial.html

[StockRoomBully]

PUNITIVE DAMAGES ARE MIND BLOWING.

$Prkr legal lawsuits is why the stock got delisted. NOW AFTER MANY YEARS SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENT DENIED. THIS IS THE BIGGEST NEWS ONLY FOR THOSE WHO FOUND IT.

SEE DD BELOW:

DAMAGES in 100s of millions or more THIS LAWSUIT WILL Reverse PPS in epic proportions

"ParkerVision Inc., a wireless technologies developer, is being delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market for failing to sustain a minimum value of $35 million. The company traded at an all-time high of $511.88 in 2000 before the dot-com bubble burst; shares were trading at 31 cents Thursday.

"CEO Jeff Parker blamed lengthy legal battles for the delisting.

“While we remain enthusiastic about a number of near-term milestones that can positively and significantly impact the outlook for ParkerVision, the on-going expense and lengthy timeframes to enforce and defend our broadly infringed patents has created some challenges, including limitations on our ability to maintain compliance with Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements," Parker said in a statement. "We remain committed to enforce our patent rights as we believe the number of infringing units covered by our current enforcement actions are in the billions of units.”

It is currently suing Qualcomm (NASDAQ:QCOM), HTC Corporation, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and LG Electronics for patent infringement. Qualcomm and Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) have filed suits against ParkerVision.

Most recent news update$:
JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESSWIRE / July 17, 2019 / ParkerVision, Inc. (PRKR) announced today that the District Court in the Middle District of Florida issued an order denying Apple’s motion for summary judgment in ParkerVision’s pending patent litigation against Qualcomm and Apple in Jacksonville, Florida. Apple’s motion sought to limit the liability for damages solely to Qualcomm. In addition, the court issued its claim construction (Markman) order, in which the Court adopted ParkerVision's proposed construction for two terms and the "plain and ordinary meaning" on the remaining terms. These decisions pave the way for a jury trial in this case, and a proposed trial schedule is required to be submitted by the parties by July 30, 2019.


https://www.bizjournals.com/jacksonville/news/2018/08/16/jacksonville-techcompany-delisted-from-nasdaq.html


https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jacksonville-district-court-denies-apples-124500789.html

[axle1090]

this is great news.

[StockRoomBully]

Do the Math Folk$!
Qualcomm last year sued Apple alleging it had violated patents related to helping mobile phones get better battery life. During an eight-day trial, Qualcomm asked the jury to award it unpaid patent royalties of up to $1.41 per iPhone that violated the patents.

The $31 million penalty is small change for Apple, the second most valuable U.S. company after Microsoft Corp, with a market value of $866 billion and annual revenue totaling hundreds of billions of dollars. But the setting of a per-phone royalty rate for Qualcomm's technology gives the chip supplier a fresh line of attack in its two-year old legal battle with Apple.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-qualcomm-idUSKCN1QW2KB

[StockRoomBully]

Done deal! Louis Freeh and Freeh Sporkin & Sullivan LLP Join ParkerVision Litigation Team


THIS IS GETTING INTERESTING.

JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESSWIRE / June 11, 2019 / ParkerVision, Inc. (PRKR) announced today that the Honorable Louis J. Freeh and Freeh Sporkin & Sullivan (FSS) have joined ParkerVision's litigation team. Mr. Freeh will be involved in a wide range of activities that include past ParkerVision litigations, current on-going actions, and potential future litigations.

ParkerVision Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey Parker commented, "We welcome the breadth of experience in the judicial, prosecutorial, investigative and corporate domains that Mr. Freeh and his team bring to our enforcement actions. FSS adds a diversity of skill sets, backed by the exceptional achievements of its leadership, to the ParkerVision litigation team."

https://finance.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/louis-freeh-freeh-sporkin-sullivan-123000219.html

[StockRoomBully]

Accentra Inc Paperpro vs Staples. Great DD of outcome. See below

RTTNews Staff Writer ?
Published: 6/17/2010 11:33 AM ET

"PaperPro Says Federal Court Rules Against Staples In Patent Infringement Lawsuit - Update"

PaperPro, owned by Accentra Inc., said Thursday that a federal district court ruled against office products company Staples Inc. (SPLS) in the on-going patent infringement lawsuit filed by PaperPro against that company.

The company noted that the judge denied Staples' motion for summary judgment in the patent infringement portions of the lawsuit, which can now go to trial.

https://www.rttnews.com/1337232/paperpro-says-federal-court-rules-against-staples-in-patent-infringement-lawsuit-update.aspx?refresh=1

Summer Judgement Date: June 10th 2010- Trial November 2010

final result Jan 11 2011 7 months

Staples Found Guilty in PaperPro® Patent Case
PaperPro® stapler manufacturer wins patent infringement case against Staples

NEWTOWN, Pa., Jan. 11, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- In Los Angeles Federal Court, a jury delivered a unanimous guilty verdict on all claims against office products retailer Staples (SPLS) in a patent infringement case filed by Accentra, Inc., makers of the PaperPro® stapler.

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/staples-found-guilty-in-paperpro-patent-case-113278989.html

[StockRoomBully]

Motion summary denied. dD

[StockRoomBully]

Winning At Summary Judgment

Summary judgment is to litigation what the slam dunk is to basketball. When all sides agree on the relevant facts and those facts prove or disprove the case, there’s no need for a trial to weigh the evidence. No need to prepare exhibits, subpoena witnesses, practice direct and cross examinations and so forth, because all the proof is already in the record.

Here’s how Wikipedia defines it:

In law, a summary judgment (also judgment as a matter of law) is a judgment entered by a court for one party and against another party summarily, i.e., without a full trial. Such a judgment may be issued on the merits of an entire case, or on discrete issues in that case.

https://courtroom5.com/winning-summary-judgment/

[StockRoomBully]

Samsung Electronics Settled others will do the same. See DD

JACKSONVILLE, Fla., July 18, 2016 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- ParkerVision, Inc. (NASDAQ:PRKR), a leading developer and marketer of radio frequency technologies used in advanced wireless solutions, announced today that it has entered into a settlement and patent license agreement with Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and its affiliates (collectively, “Samsung”) for the perpetual, worldwide license of ParkerVision’s current patent portfolio, subject to certain exclusions. In conjunction with this agreement, ParkerVision will file a motion to terminate Samsung from a pending U.S. International Trade Commission investigation and dismiss its claims against Samsung in two United States District Court cases. The companies agreed not to disclose the specific financial terms of the agreement.

ParkerVision’s Chairman and CEO, Jeffrey Parker, commented, “Samsung is a world leader in technology and innovation, and we are pleased to welcome Samsung as a licensee of our technologies and to dismiss the outstanding litigation between the parties.”

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2016/07/18/856719/0/en/ParkerVision-Enters-into-Patent-License-and-Settlement-Agreement-with-Samsung.html

[StockRoomBully]

What Happens After a Summary Judgment is Granted?

When a judge grants a judgment based on a summary judgment motion, it is termed a "summary judgment" because it summarily disposes of the legal issues without a hearing on the facts. A summary judgment disposes of the entire case. It is a final ruling in the case, and no further testimony or evidence is heard.

The parties can bring certain motions after any judgment, including a summary judgment. The party who won can ask for an award of costs and sometimes attorney fees from the other party, unless those were already included in the summary judgment. The party who lost can ask the court to reconsider the ruling, to strike the ruling or to grant a new trial. That party can also appeal the summary judgment to a higher court for review. Strict time limits apply to appeals procedures, and once the time for appeal is past, the judgment is final. The winning party can then take steps to enforce the judgment. For example, if it is a money judgment, the winning party can try to collect the money owing under the judgment.

https://legalbeagle.com/7618943-comes-after-summary-judgment.html

[StockRoomBully]

Motion for judgement - Even after the trial has started, the parties can request that the judge make the ruling before the case is sent to the jury. Like the summary judgement, this motion is used when there aren't any facts that are disputed in the case. If testimony in the trial has resolved the disputes (at least to reasonable minds), then the motion for judgement will probably be accepted and the judge will rule -- if not, the judge will deny the motion.

[Hammtastic]

Understood, thank you!

[StockRoomBully]

When a motion for summary judgment is denied, the nonmoving party achieves a form of premium that enables a case to settle for an additional amount. Put simply, the settlement value of a case increases when a motion for summary judgment is denied. Thus, denials of summary judgment up the ante in the litigation game.

[StockRoomBully]

Jacksonville District Court Denies Apple's Motion for Summary Judgment and Issues Markman Oder

The court’s claim construction order also invalidated two of the 18 claims in the case as being indefinite. These two claims were dependent claims and, therefore, do not narrow the scope of ParkerVision's intellectual property rights asserted against Apple and Qualcomm in this litigation.

A parallel case is pending in the District of New Jersey against LG and the LG case has agreed to adopt the claim construction established by the Jacksonville court.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jacksonville-district-court-denies-apples-124500789.html

[StockRoomBully]

$appl $Qcom Once motion denied PPS should continue increasing till talks of settlements are public before trial date July 30th. $PRKR imo

Mr. Parker continued, “We are pleased that after years of motions by the defendants which delayed a decision based on the merits of this case, our infringement allegations against Apple and Qualcomm are now headed for trial. In our opinion, Qualcomm and Apple have been enjoying all the benefits of our technology - a technology in which we invested tens of millions to develop and patent -- without compensating us for it.

[StockRoomBully]

2019 / ParkerVision, Inc. (PRKR) announced today that the District Court in the Middle District of Florida issued an order denying Apple’s motion for summary judgment in ParkerVision’s pending patent litigation against Qualcomm and Apple in Jacksonville, Florida. Apple’s motion sought to limit the liability for damages solely to Qualcomm. In addition, the court issued its claim construction (Markman) order, in which the Court adopted ParkerVision's proposed construction for two terms and the "plain and ordinary meaning" on the remaining terms. These decisions pave the way for a jury trial in this case, and a proposed trial schedule is required to be submitted by the parties by July 30, 2019.

“We believe the court’s Markman ruling puts ParkerVision in a strong position to effectively assert its intellectual property against the accused infringers. We are confident that we can explain to a jury what we invented and why it is so critically important, thus enabling a well-informed jury to make a determination regarding fair compensation."

We are pleased that after years of motions by the defendants which delayed a decision based on the merits of this case, our infringement allegations against Apple and Qualcomm are now headed for trial. In our opinion, Qualcomm and Apple have been enjoying all the benefits of our technology - a technology in which we invested tens of millions to develop and patent -- without compensating us for it.

[Hammtastic]

What does that mean?
I’ve read the whole article and I’m not sure what denying the motion means.
New to this whole thing