Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
OPTICRIME: RosenSCUM DUMPING BEFORE EXPERT MARKET !!
100% CORRECT folks - this X 1 billion !!!
Look boys n girls....Brett Rosen is a SERIAL OTC FRAUD and con master scammer - he was working in-concert with dirty criminal Roger Pawson on the front-load and entire initial first rounds of the OTPI-CRIME scene ultra scam....he's now UNLOADING ONE MORE FRONT LOAD before this POS goes EXPERT MARKET in 30 to 60 days....NO LONGER THAN THAT......max time.....per SEC/OTC regs on FAILURE TO FILE + no updated profile + a criminal pump aka Rosen of which both the OTC and SEC have been fully notified and alerted with all supporting data....etc.....
The BIG NEW LIE aka Rosen con is the ultra bullshit of:
Rosen-CON-Speak: "Hey bros....so like ya just walk into the court man.....and ya take a pull on your beer and YOU TELL THAT JUDGE that hey dude....ME...I'M THE RECEIVER...and then like totally POOF man....wipe my coke/meth sweat off my face and jittering hands....ya just wait like a week or so and man YOU GET THE CEO SPOT and then ya just take like this $100 MILLION company bro...and ya just shove that shit right into OPTI-CON and poof man...ya hit X-Twitter and YouBoob Buffalo Chips lying pump channel and like it's all dunn dudes....see man....that like so freaking easy bros....and anyone who says it ain't is shit man...."
REALITY:
1) Rosen ain't even been before the court (it's been over TWO MONTHS and close to three now since the judge ruled "APPOINT A RECEIVER" is the only allowable next step aka LIQUIDATE THIS POS) - and Rosen acts as if BOOM BANG BING it's gonna take like a week dudes....BULLSHIT ALERT !!!
2) There's a SHIT TON of unpaid OPTI-CRIME creditors and FIRST JOB THE "RECEIVER" has to do (and it CAN NOT be Rosen or ANYONE tied to his con sorry ass !!) FIRST THING is to put out a formal notice and EXHAUSTIVE EFFORT to located ALL UNPAID CREDITORS and to alert ANY INTERESTED PARTY(s) WHO MAY HAVE CLAIMS AGAINST ANY AND ALL OPTI-CRIME ASSETS....and it goes from there.....
3) Under CA law of "Receivership" it's a MINIMUM 5 MONTH to 6 MONTHS PROCESS after after after the WEEKS IT TAKES TO APPOINT THE RECEIVER to allow the "NOTICE TO CREDITORS and INTERESTED PARTIES" to pass and allow them to make claims with the receiver or file motions or take legal position filings etc.
4) THEN the scraps of OPTI get carved up and divied out BY THE RECEIVER at their discretion and that of the court and "might" involve LITIGATION by major creditors - it's a BK and INSOLVENCY PROCESS...."RECEIVERSHIP" was a invention as the alternate LIQUIDATION ROUTE vs appearing in the BK court system......
ANYTHING ROSEN HAS STATED IS EPIC LIES and FRAUD - every last word.....he's a gutter pump and ran the front-end of this latest pump.....
OPTI-CRIME WILL GO "EXPERT MARKET" long long long long before any RECEIVER can have a chance in hell to act.......and that means ILL-LIQUID and INSTA SHIT SHARE TOILET PAPER PRICE of .00000X per share.....FROZEN LIKE DRIED QUICK SET CONCRETE ON A HOT SUMMER Brett Rosen-SCUM sweating like a methed up pig on a Buffalo Chip scammer pump video con day......simple as that kids....:)))
READ A REAL ATTORNEY SITE on "WHAT IS A RECEIVERSHIP" and "WHAT ARE THE STEPS AND TIMELINE" blah blah blah and then "WHAT HAPPENS WITH JUDGEMENT CREDITORS" during a receivership......and then let the baggy holder weeping and gnashing of teeth begin...... -
https://harris-sliwoski.com/cannalawblog/receivership-and-distressed-cannabis-assets-in-california/
That shows a public stock "cannabis company in CALIFORNIA - but it's highly similar to Opti-CRIME and what is happening with this busted broke BK fraud and scam"...... !!!!
QUOTE:
" In California, a receiver is an officer appointed by the court to take possession of and to protect assets for the benefit of all persons who may have an interest in those assets. The receiver is a neutral agent of the court and holds assets for the court, not for the plaintiff or the defendant. A receivership is only a provisional remedy in an action that seeks some other relief by final judgment. In other words, you cannot file a lawsuit for the sole purpose of having a receiver appointed.
The court will outline the powers of the receiver in an order, which typically include temporarily managing the business until it gets back into better financial standing, selling off assets, employing employees and professionals, and entering into contracts or leases, among other powers.
"
SEE THAT - "THE COURT" appoints the receiver (there are PROFESSIONAL RECEIVERS and that is HIGHLY LIKELY who the court will demand - and they do not come cheap either. The BULLSHIT that Rosen-SCUM will be the receiver and/or JUST CHOOSE A DUDE WILLY NILLY as a lied about in the Buffalo Chip pump the crime Youboob video is ULTRA BULLSHIT !!)
AND:
"Receivership can be expensive, and the costs are generally paid from the income stream generated by the receivership estate (AKA the cannabis business). However, when the receivership estate produces no income or produces income insufficient to compensate a receiver (or when equity requires), the appointing court has broad discretion in determining which party to the litigation should pay the expenses of a receivership. Ordinarily, a court will require the party that requested the receiver’s appointment to bear these costs.
"
AND THEN......ANY "COURT APPROVED/APPOINTED RECEIVER" aka NEUTRAL 3rd party BY LAW and NOT A PARTY TO THE ACTION nor a LEGAL COUNCIL OF SAME.....will take them about 38 SECONDS REVIEWING OPTI-CRIME to realize that ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFIT OF TOO MANY LINED UP CREDITORS TO COUNT .....will be ACTION STEP ONE to allow the disenfranchised STIFFED CREDITORS and THOSE HOLDING LEGAL JUDGEMENT "AS CREDITORS" from court cases already won - will be STEP ONE to allow them their due process while chopping up the carcass of OPTI-FRAUD.....
SO....then starts the loooong road of NOTIFYING ALL INTERESTED PARTIES and CREDITORS TO COME BEFORE THE RECEIVER and COURT to make their claims......read it and weep Brett Rosen-SCUM the pump clown fraud.....EXPERT MARKET Looooooong before this POS crime seen ever sees the light of day again, let alone with Rosen-SCUM as "CEO" when the RECEIVER as court appointed looks at that ass hats loooong and dirty record of BUSTING DOWN OTC SCAMS to No-Bid and DEAD TICKER STATUS like on the fast track mode.....too many times to even count........
https://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2008/03/articles/business-bankruptcy-issues/assignments-for-the-benefit-of-creditors-simple-as-abc/
QUOTE:
"Assignments For The Benefit Of Creditors: Simple As ABC?
By Bob Eisenbach on March 16, 2008
POSTED IN BUSINESS BANKRUPTCY ISSUES, THE FINANCIALLY TROUBLED COMPANY
Companies in financial trouble are often forced to liquidate their assets to pay creditors. While a Chapter 11 bankruptcy sometimes makes the most sense, other times a Chapter 7 bankruptcy is required, and in still other situations a corporate dissolution may be best. This post examines another of the options, the assignment for the benefit of creditors, commonly known as an "ABC."
A Few Caveats. It’s important to remember that determining which path an insolvent company should take depends on the specific facts and circumstances involved. As in many areas of the law, one size most definitely does not fit all for financially troubled companies. With those caveats in mind, let’s consider one scenario sometimes seen when a venture-backed or other investor-funded company runs out of money.
One Scenario. After a number of rounds of investment, the investors of a privately held corporation have decided not to put in more money to fund the company’s operations. The company will be out of cash within a few months and borrowing from the company’s lender is no longer an option. The accounts payable list is growing (and aging) and some creditors have started to demand payment. A sale of the business may be possible, however, and a term sheet from a potential buyer is anticipated soon. The company’s real property lease will expire in nine months, but it’s possible that a buyer might want to take over the lease.
A Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing is problematic because there is insufficient cash to fund operations going forward, no significant revenues are being generated, and debtor in possession financing seems highly unlikely unless the buyer itself would make a loan.
The board prefers to avoid a Chapter 7 bankruptcy because it’s concerned that a bankruptcy trustee, unfamiliar with the company’s technology, would not be able to generate the best recovery for creditors.
The ABC Option. In many states, another option that may be available to companies in financial trouble is an assignment for the benefit of creditors (or "general assignment for the benefit of creditors" as it is sometimes called). The ABC is an insolvency proceeding governed by state law rather than federal bankruptcy law.
California ABCs. In California, where ABCs have been done for years, the primary governing law is found in California Code of Civil Procedure sections 493.010 to 493.060 and sections 1800 to 1802, among other provisions of California law. California Code of Civil Procedure section 1802 sets forth, in remarkably brief terms, the main procedural requirements for a company (or individual) making, and an assignee accepting, a general assignment for the benefit of creditors:
1802. (a) In any general assignment for the benefit of creditors, as defined in Section 493.010, the assignee shall, within 30 days after the assignment has been accepted in writing, give written notice of the assignment to the assignor’s creditors, equityholders, and other parties in interest as set forth on the list provided by the assignor pursuant to subdivision (c).
(b) In the notice given pursuant to subdivision (a), the assignee shall establish a date by which creditors must file their claims to be able to share in the distribution of proceeds of the liquidation of the assignor’s assets. That date shall be not less than 150 days and not greater than 180 days after the date of the first giving of the written notice to creditors and parties in interest.
(c) The assignor shall provide to the assignee at the time of the making of the assignment a list of creditors, equityholders, and other parties in interest, signed under penalty of perjury, which shall include the names, addresses, cities, states, and ZIP Codes for each person together with the amount of that person’s anticipated claim in the assignment proceedings.
In California, the company and the assignee enter into a formal "Assignment Agreement." The company must also provide the assignee with a list of creditors, equityholders, and other interested parties (names, addresses, and claim amounts). The assignee is required to give notice to creditors of the assignment, setting a bar date for filing claims with the assignee that is between five to six months later.
ABCs In Other States. Many other states have ABC statutes although in practice they have been used to varying degrees. For example, ABCs have been more common in California than in states on the East Coast, but important exceptions exist. Delaware corporations can generally avail themselves of Delaware’s voluntary assignment statutes, and its procedures have both similarities and important differences from the approach taken in California. Scott Riddle of the Georgia Bankruptcy Law Blog has an interesting post discussing ABC’s under Georgia law. Florida is another state in which ABCs are done under specific statutory procedures. For an excellent book that has information on how ABCs are conducted in various states, see Geoffrey Berman’s General Assignments for the Benefit of Creditors: The ABCs of ABCs, published by the American Bankruptcy Institute.
Important Features Of ABCs. A full analysis of how ABCs function in a particular state and how one might affect a specific company requires legal advice from insolvency counsel. The following highlights some (but by no means all) of the key features of ABCs:
Court Filing Issue. In California, making an ABC does not require a public court filing. Some other states, however, do require a court filing to initiate or complete an ABC.
Select The Assignee. Unlike a Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee, who is randomly appointed from those on an approved panel, a corporation making an assignment is generally able to choose the assignee.
Shareholder Approval. Most corporations require both board and shareholder approval for an ABC because it involves the transfer to the assignee of substantially all of the corporation’s assets. This makes ABCs impractical for most publicly held corporations.
Liquidator As Fiduciary. The assignee is a fiduciary to the creditors and is typically a professional liquidator.
Assignee Fees. The fees charged by assignees often involve an upfront payment and a percentage based on the assets liquidated.
No Automatic Stay. In many states, including California, an ABC does not give rise to an automatic stay like bankruptcy, although an assignee can often block judgment creditors from attaching assets.
Event Of Default. The making of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors is typically a default under most contracts. As a result, contracts may be terminated upon the assignment under an ipso facto clause.
Proof Of Claim. For creditors, an ABC process generally involves the submission to the assignee of a proof of claim by a stated deadline or bar date, similar to bankruptcy. (Click on the link for an example of an ABC proof of claim form.)
Employee Priority. Employee and other claim priorities are governed by state law and may involve different amounts than apply under the Bankruptcy Code. In California, for example, the employee wage and salary priority is $4,300, not the $10,950 amount currently in force under the Bankruptcy Code.
20 Day Goods. Generally, ABC statutes do not have a provision similar to that under Bankruptcy Code Section 503(b)(9), which gives an administrative claim priority to vendors who sold goods in the ordinary course of business to a debtor during the 20 days before a bankruptcy filing. As a result, these vendors may recover less in an ABC than in a bankruptcy case, subject to assertion of their reclamation rights.
Landlord Claim. Unlike bankruptcy, there generally is no cap imposed on a landlord’s claim for breach of a real property lease in an ABC.
Sale Of Assets. In many states, including California, sales by the assignee of the company’s assets are completed as a private transaction without approval of a court. However, unlike a bankruptcy Section 363 sale, there is usually no ability to sell assets "free and clear" of liens and security interests without the consent or full payoff of lienholders. Likewise, leases or executory contracts cannot be assigned without required consents from the other contracting party.
Avoidance Actions.
Most states allow assignees to pursue preferences and fraudulent transfers. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has held that the Bankruptcy Code pre-empts California’s preference statute, California Code of Civil Procedure section 1800. Nevertheless, to date the California state courts have refused to follow the Ninth Circuit’s decision and still permit assignees to sue for preferences in California state court. In February 2008, a Delaware state court followed the California state court decisions, refusing either to follow the Ninth Circuit position or to hold that the California preference statute was pre-empted by the Bankruptcy Code.
The Delaware court was required to apply California’s ABC preference statute because the avoidance action arose out of an earlier California ABC.
The Scenario Revisited. With this overview in mind, let’s return to our company in distress.
The prospect of a term sheet from a potential buyer may influence whether our hypothetical company should choose an ABC or another approach. Some buyers will refuse to purchase assets outside of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy or a Chapter 7 case. Others are comfortable with the ABC process and believe it provides an added level of protection from fraudulent transfer claims compared to purchasing the assets directly from the insolvent company. Depending on the value to be generated by a sale, these considerations may lead the company to select one approach over the other available options.
In states like California where no court approval is required for a sale, the ABC can also mean a much faster closing — often within a day or two of the ABC itself provided that the assignee has had time to perform due diligence on the sale and any alternatives — instead of the more typical 30-60 days required for bankruptcy court approval of a Section 363 sale. Given the speed at which they can be done, in the right situation an ABC can permit a "going concern" sale to be achieved.
Secured creditors with liens against the assets to be sold will either need to be paid off through the sale or will have to consent to release their liens; forced "free and clear" sales generally are not possible in an ABC.
If the buyer decides to take the real property lease, the landlord will need to consent to the lease assignment. Unlike bankruptcy, the ABC process generally cannot force a landlord or other third party to accept assignment of a lease or executory contract.
If the buyer decides not to take the lease, or no sale occurs, the fact that only nine months remains on the lease means that this company would not benefit from bankruptcy’s cap on landlord claims. If the company’s lease had years remaining, and if the landlord were unwilling to agree to a lease termination approximating the result under bankruptcy’s landlord claim cap, the company would need to consider whether a bankruptcy filing was necessary to avoid substantial dilution to other unsecured creditor claims that a large, uncapped landlord claim would produce in an ABC.
If the potential buyer walks away, the assignee would be responsible for determining whether a sale of all or a part of the assets was still possible. In any event, assets would be liquidated by the assignee to the extent feasible and any proceeds would be distributed to creditors in order of their priority through the ABC’s claims process.
While other options are available and should be explored, an ABC may make sense for this company depending upon the buyer’s views, the value to creditors and other constituencies that a sale would produce, and a clear-eyed assessment of alternative insolvency methods.
Conclusion. When weighing all of the relevant issues, an insolvent company’s management and board would be well-served to seek the advice of counsel and other insolvency professionals as early as possible in the process. The old song may say that ABC is as "easy as 1-2-3," but assessing whether an assignment for the benefit of creditors is best for an insolvent company involves the analysis of a myriad of complex factors.
"
CEO is a crook run like you’re running from fire
Secretly and wisely
OPTI-FRAUD: ANOTHER BRETT ROSEN OTC HUSTLE CRIME !!
Looks kids - Brett Rosen has a trail of No-Bid and BUSTED OUT SHIT PILE OTC STINKY PINKY SCAMS as long as a cross country freight train hauler.....
Rosen is WORKING WITH CRIMINAL "CEO" SCAMMER Roger doger Pawson......making NOTHING BUT BANK and running this latest PUMP the DUMP criminal scam....
Rosen HAS NO MOTION BEFORE THE COURT FOR A RECEIVER TO BE APPOINTED which BY DEFINITION can NOT be him and and and SAID RECEIVER must BY LAW then make EVERY EFFORT TO NOTIFY LEGALLY ALL CREDITORS and ALL PARTIES WHO MAY WANT TO BE JUDGEMENT CREDITORS and then carve up the shit heap table scraps of OPTI-CRIME and DISPERSE IT TO ALL CREDITORS EQUALLY or else BK THIS SHIT PILE POLICE TAPE CRIME SCENE.....
A MONTH and Rosen hasn't filed JACK SHIT with "THE COURT" to even get "on the docket calendar" to be heard - and THAT alone takes time and then time for the judge to rule and issue a ruling etc....Rosen is lying out is con-ass in spades.....
https://roa.sdcourt.ca.gov/roa/
San Diego Superior Court North County division
Court: 37
Year: 2022
Case number:00051185
One will see the case is DEAD IN THE WATER and Rosen ain't filed shit to move the court for "appointment of a receiver" and ain't even "on the calendar" of the court - aka he's a shit talker running a MASSIVE crime pump induced "LIQUIDITY EVENT" which HE FABRICATED for him to UNLOAD SHARES by the super tanker IN TO THE PUMP he damn created via deception lies and fraud......simple as that.....he has NO STANDING to be the "CEO" or "Receiver" etc. of OPTI-CRIME a BK entity which owes a SHIT TON of creditors and open lawsuit plaintiffs THEIR MONEY BACK long before ass hat Rosen gets to "do" a damn thing with OPTI-CRIME....
YET Bret Rosen sits on X-PUMP fraud channels and Youboob LYING that:
"Hey bros....like ya just walk into the court man...and YOU TELL THE JUDGE that hey bro make ME THE CEO and it takes like a day or two bro and then BAMM ya just makes OPTI FRAUD into this whole new thing...and oh oh ya bros and dude...like I got a $100 mil scam company WAITING TO REVERSE MERGE TO A TAINTED LAWSUIT FILLED SHIT SHELL...yeah bros....cause like there be no other clean shells or a real IPO or SPAC for a legit business to use ...only like 100's or more....BUT they gonna choose the shit lawsuit mired scam shell of OPTI-CRIME...yo bros and it takes like a few days bros...."
The dude is a criminal ass hat and not a smart con at that.....lil too much hittin the pipe n slamming the beers while peddling dog shit speak to idiots...to penny marks n dupes who suck on PUMP n DUMP cotton candy like grade school kids in the special needs classes LMAO....WTF people....this is a FRAUD...get it....get it....Rosen is a con and always has been and always will be :))
EVERYTHING Rosen is pumping on X-TWATTER IS LIES and BIGGER LIES and LIES LIES LIES......and and he's using PAID OTC STINKY PINKY SCAM "SHOWS" on YouBoob to also RUN THE PUMP and has a massive X and Stocktwit "PAID CREW" aka PENNY FRAUD NON-DISCLOSING PROMOTERS hyping this PUMP and LIQUIDITY DUMP......
It's 100% ALL..ALL...ALL.... for Rosen (who fronted this scam and front-loaded this crime scene WITH PAWSON) for Rosen the perp to GET THE HELL OUT BEFORE THIS SHIT HEAP GOES "EXPERT MARKET" which is only about 30 short days away for FAILURE TO UPDATE COMPANY PROFILE and FAILURE TO FILE ANNUAL REPORT w/ 16 months passed since last shit filing....thee end....done.....Rosen is pulling the ejection handle to UNLOAD ALL THEY CAN before this ticker goes DEADER THAN A BENT CRIME DOOR NAIL....
It's just that simple boys n girls......Bret Rosen will be indicted for OTC penny fraud one day....THAT is a stone cold fact....watch n learn...kids....:)))
One of Rosen's paid shill criminal X pump "crew members" is this ass clown "OTC SUPER ROBOT" aka "Jake" who will be indicted before this shit show is all said and done....just pure OTC gutter fraud of a dead shell STINKY PINKY CRIME SCENE...all people need to know....
https://stocktwits.com/bostonbrooksby/message/562188936
OPTI-FRAUD is headed to EXPERT MARKET in very short order....NO UPDATED COMPANY PROFILE and NO ANNUAL REPORT will be timely filed = DELIST TO EXPERT per the OTC own internal rules........Also the WY corp is DEAD and DEFAULTED FOR TAXES OWED and the OTC ACCESS FEES ARE NOT and HAVE NOT BEEN PAID...ALL will amount to MOVE TO EXPERT MARKET and ticker goes DEADER THAN ALL THE OTHER Bret Rosen NO-Bid SCAM TICKERS...watch n learn....
https://www.otcmarkets.com/corporate-services/pink-market/pink-current-and-limited-information-disclosure-guidelines
https://www.otcmarkets.com/corporate-services/fee-schedule
If the shoe fits . . ..
I'm the one thats stupid??
Lol...
.
Yes my bad…. did not mean to insult it did give a different OPTI company symbol which people have confused and used on this board in the past.
if u people are too stupid to see all I did was copy and paste directly from OTC Markets update on Thursday, well I cant help uz https://t.me/otcupdates/65964 did I click bullish or bearish no, simply a link for info
What are you trying to show me? An automatic TA update from November? Do you know how this stuff works?
There is no legal ceo heading OPTI right now for another 23 or so days. They can't buy, sell, dilute, cut shares, anything. TA updates automatically every 3 months. So it was just restricted hitting the unrestricted. But that doesn't mean that they are tradable. See "held at dtc" for actual tradeable float. That even went down.. barely.
$OPTI
💰0.0039
(https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/OPTI/?offer_id=10&aff_id=29379)Pink Limited, AS: 4.8B, OS: 4.7B, US: 4.6B
Update Delay: 60 minutes (https://telegram.me/otcupdatesbot?start=joinnow)
Held at DTC Shares Updated:
🔴 4,083,522,387 (2023-11-27)
🟢 4,083,481,787 (2024-02-15)
Difference: -0.0% (-40K)
Restricted Shares Updated:
🔴 251,660,578 (2023-11-27)
🟢 195,427,653 (2024-02-15)
Difference: -22.3% (-56M)
Unrestricted Shares Updated:
🔴 4,495,724,853 (2023-11-27)
🟢 4,551,957,778 (2024-02-15)
Difference: +1.3% (+56M)
Chart (https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/OPTI/?offer_id=10&aff_id=29379), OTC Profile (https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/OPTI/security), Twitter (https://twitter.com/search?q=$OPTI&src=typed_query), @otcupdates
Block the noise. If you don't know how to trade OTC and just like to cry about it.. maybe this isn't the place for you? Try small caps maybe? Or just put your money in growth stocks and follow Dave Ramsey's advise lol
Lol… “Nope”. Pretty sure that’s what OJ said when he was asked if he did it. But we ALL know better.
I know for a fact this is a winner now! Definitely adding more
Do you know someone named "Thunderman"? Only asking cuz you and he (over on that OTHER investment board) seem to have the same "script". Just curious if you two are working for the same people and if those people hand out "pre-written scripts" so that we all see the SAME language on two DIFFERENT sites.
Never had it... Looks like others taking theirs off the table.
Some reality... that Brett Rosen is trying hard to twist into something its not.
It breaks down to the receiver needs to be a 3rd party that doesn't have an interest in either side. To be fair and impartial. And approved by the court. Not Brett Rosen. Brett has said he is in this to get HIS money back. And even if a receiver appointed him as interim CEO, and I think that is NOT a given, that is solely up to the receiver, Brett would have very little power anyway. The receiver has final say in all decisions. That would include any sort of merger.
This is a good read on receivership.
https://www.munsch.com/portalresource/lookup/wosid/cp-base-4-6096/overrideFile.name=/basic_receivership_law_concepts_article_presentation_pdf.pdf
To Add... Brett Rosen is very much oversimplifying the situation here. It's very complex. He CANNOT just throw the OPTI books out the window and start over with some other companies' books. It's ludicrous to even think that might be possible. The OPTI books need resolution first. All debt, bills, and judgments, shareholders, all need to be accounted for. Brett has said himself there are people coming out of the woodwork claiming OPTI/Roger Pawson owes them something. That ALL needs to be resolved before OPTI can move on to even filing disclosure statements. And lets not forget about the fraud. In the eyes of the law, a company is treated the same as an individual. That means OPTI is just as responsible for the fraud committed as Rodger Pawson is. Fraud that Brett has admitted happened. This will all take a very long time and may never see complete resolution. And remember Alot of the accounting information is missing and likely never recoverable. So, it seems an impossible task. I get the feeling there will be more litigation.
Brett Rosen has been painting a typical OTC fantasy...
Brett Rosen is already fighting with other parties. They are not going to agree to him being the receiver, and I really doubt the Judge would either.
Also any "merger" would need to be processed by FINRA and the SEC. That is very unlikely to happen considering OPTI is under investigation for fraud.
.
Buyer Beware
..
Did you leave 300% on the table again? 🤣
Brett Rosen is already fighting with other parties. They are not going to agree to him being the receiver, and I really doubt the Judge would either.
Also any "merger" would need to be processed by FINRA and the SEC. That is very unlikely to happen considering OPTI is under investigation for fraud.
.
Buyer Beware
..
..
I'm not sure if the same restrictions apply for corporate receivership like this. I know in Nevada it is common for people to sue for custodianship/receivership and be granted despite being parties to the action.
I just looked it up and OPTI is based in Wyoming. I only did a quick search, but 1-33-102 says no person interested in an action shall be appointed receiver except by consent of the parties.
I'm pretty sure he can be appointed receiver, he just has to swear an oath that he'll act in the best interests of all shareholders and is liable if he favors himself in any way.
But yes, ideally he would pick a neutral receiver. That's kind of the least concerning part of the current pump, though. I'd want details about the potential companies and why they would want to do a reverse merger with OPTI.
To Add... Brett Rosen is very much oversimplifying the situation here. It's very complex. He CANNOT just throw the OPTI books out the window and start over with some other companies' books. It's ludicrous to even think that might be possible. The OPTI books need resolution first. All debt, bills, and judgments, shareholders, all need to be accounted for. Brett has said himself there are people coming out of the woodwork claiming OPTI/Roger Pawson owes them something. That ALL needs to be resolved before OPTI can move on to even filing disclosure statements. And lets not forget about the fraud. In the eyes of the law, a company is treated the same as an individual. That means OPTI is just as responsible for the fraud committed as Rodger Pawson is. Fraud that Brett has admitted happened. This will all take a very long time and may never see complete resolution. And remember Alot of the accounting information is missing and likely never recoverable. So, it seems an impossible task. I get the feeling there will be more litigation.
Brett Rosen has been painting a typical OTC fantasy...
.
Buyer Beware
..
It breaks down to the receiver needs to be a 3rd party that doesn't have an interest in either side. To be fair and impartial. And approved by the court. Not Brett Rosen. Brett has said he is in this to get HIS money back. And even if a receiver appointed him as interim CEO, and I think that is NOT a given, that is solely up to the receiver, Brett would have very little power anyway. The receiver has final say in all decisions. That would include any sort of merger.
This is a good read on receivership.
https://www.munsch.com/portalresource/lookup/wosid/cp-base-4-6096/overrideFile.name=/basic_receivership_law_concepts_article_presentation_pdf.pdf
.
Buyer Beware
..
Respectfully, why can't he appoint himself receiver? I am not sure why that wouldn't be allowed, so I am not arguing, just asking for clarification.
I share plenty of concerns about all the buzzwords being dropped; it seems more geared toward gaining investor interest than a realistic merger, at this point. I'm not sure why any company would choose a reverse merger if there was no possibility of dilution. Why should legacy shareholders be gifted anything?
Opti observations…..
a whole heck of lots of ask slaps in the .004’s…
followed by light volume sell off in the afternoon
what that means
I have no idea
Good luck to all
All around bad day for the market.
I'm not going to keep posting here, said my piece as it had my attention, that interview should be plain enough to say no fckng way this works out
Holy shit! I just watched the first half of that video... He does say he's going to appoint himself receiver. Lol!! Of course he can't do that! I can't wait for the judge's response when he tries!! Lol!! It's very clear by that video that Brett Rosen is a lying conman. He's spuing all kinds of penny stock scam phrases. All bullshit, the Nasdaq?? 100-million-dollar companies??? Lol... NONE of that is true. If a 100-million-dollar company wants to go public, they're not going to do it with a ticker that has a very long history of been a SCAM with like 25 million in debt! That just makes ZERO sense!!
LoL!!!
.
Buyer Beware
..
What’s a good dip & rip moment for Opti…
I come in peace…. Have Opti on the watch list..
trying to take advantage of dip & rips on other
plays….. looks like we are nearing .0039… I’m
thinking that’s a good entry, but what do I know
Good luck to all
Dirty Brett Rosen DUMPING INTO THIS PUMP !!!
THIS X 1 BILLION folks - you better heed that sage advice on regarding this OTC shit show stinky pinky YIELD SIGN non filer scam shit show machine and Brett Rosen NEWEST CRIME SCENE SCAM SCAM SCAM and PUMP the DUMP fraud "live" as it gets.....!!!
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/OPTI/disclosure
YIELD SIGN soon to be DEAD TICKER GRAY MARKET NON FILING TRASH n SCAM OPTI-CRIME !!
Rosen is 100% UN-LOADING BEFORE THIS POS GOES GRAY MARKET "FAILURE TO FILE ANNUAL REPORT" !!!!!!
Folks- this is THEE "MO" of DIRTY CON BRETT ROSEN and it's ALL about creating liquidity for that criminal little punk con-man to DUMP into his SELF CREATED PUMP.......
Vague and vast big mouth "claims" of "oh yeah dudes, I gots a company to insert and merge and $MILLIONS riding and then then then bros we get me as CEO and then POOF we go NASDAQ in like 1 yr or less"...blah blah blah VERBAL DIARRHEA on roids !!!
Rosen is a con - it's that simple. That ass hat on that scam "interview" crime pump "show" aka Buffalo Fireside Buffalo Shit CHIPS - was ALL a pile of lies and fraud....Rosen CAN NOT and WILL NOT merely "BECOME CEO in you know..like 30 days bros" when a damn CA civil court docket takes MONTHS to get a freaking simple motion "on the calendar" let alone "heard by the judge" and then "ruled-on" etc.
Rosen DOES NOT and CAN NOT by law "appoint himself receiver" as he LIED about too many times to count on that fraud YouBoob pump the scam paid promo con show....don't work that way kids...law 101 ....and Rosen is shit talking "the law" and couldn't get a law degree from a Crackerjack box on his best damn day....swilling beer and hyped up and sweating ON METH or COKE as usual...chatter boxing like a hyped-up junky...stutter-speaking and rambling like he's red-lining from the dope for dopes.....and mopping off the sweat when it's cold as hell per CA weather standards (San Diego was in the low 40's last night !).....the dude is gutter material...a real bottom dragger scum bag.....
That ass clown BRETT CON ROSEN has ZERO proof he "Invested $10 million into OPTI" blah blah....whatever total BULLSHIT LIES he's peddling - the clown doesn't have $1 million let alone the $10's and $10's he claims to pump into gutter fraud tickers ....EVERY TICKER HE TOUCHES goes down and to shit and no-bid and CAVEAT EMPTOR and GRAY MARKET shit BUT he claims, "Yo dudes, I make a shit ton of money investing in OTC shit scam tickers".....REALLY...really...WTF ?
Dirty punk Brett is a front-loader and pinnacle of GUTTER OTC HOW TO RUN SCAMS...he was 100% "IN ON IT" with criminal CEO Pawson at OPTI-CRIME....just a total criminal scam....not a civil crime....but CRIMINAL DOJ-SEC kinda crimes committed.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeUuPFyjy2g
Bash away skankity skank
"BUFFALO FIRESIDE YOUTUBE PUMP" MOVED TO INDICT LIST !
Well - last night this ass hat clown "BUFFALO FIRESIDE CHAT WE PUMP CRIMINAL STOCK SCAMS" - that clown just got his sorry ass moved up to the Queen of Spades in the "TO BE INDICTED OPTI CRIME DECK OF DIRTY CARDS" -
Roger Pawson is the ACE OF SPADES being hunted
Brett Rosen is the KING OF SPADES now on the MOST LIKELY TO BE CRIMINALLY INDICTED FOR STOCK FRAUD and NOT just civilly charged by the DOJ-SEC per my insider sources aka one notch below God almighty himself :)
And NOW this ass hat punk "BUFFALO FIRESIDE CHAT" aka QUEEN OF SPADES "in the deck" aka shit show scammer on Youtube last night - he just got himself a spot "on the list" to get his sorry con ass indicted !!!
This was FRAUD PUMP 101 SHIT SHOW LAST NIGHT - ALL the hallmarks of HOW TO RUN A OTC CRIMINAL FRONT-LOAD PROMOTED SCAM using SCAMMERS including YouBOOB and this clown Buffalo SCAM CHATS !!
I'm now personally coming for that guy like legal hellfire itself - going to see him perp walked when I get done with his fraud pumping fat ass. Rosen slamming Heineken beers and laughing at bagholders and dupes saying, "TROLLS" and "THEY CAN FUCK OFF" and "SUCK MY COCK" while this fake ass "interviewer" aka PAID SCAM PROMOTER laughed along with dirty Brett WTF !!!
ONE giant Brett Rosen and PAID FAKE "INTERVIEWER" pump the scam circle jerk- that's all this Buffalo clown is and was - and now he just got his sorry ass into the legal ring and legal RINGER :))
THIS IS "AT THE SEC" as of this AM and to other key "people" including the OTC etc. PRESERVED FO FO FOREVER NOW as evidence of these crimes being committed :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeUuPFyjy2g
Nah...I'll just bash it down here on iHub. 🤗🤗🤗
How about this for a pump. Look at the amount of shorters here. They are looking desperate..
TWITTER? What is that?
If you want to know the latest, you all need to get on Twitter.
GOOD MORNING $$$$$OPTI$$$$$ ASK SLAPPERS!!!!
Lindsay sold my 2 million shares . I do t think be a merger soon . Read the news and said it clear . Not going hold forever and see price go down . It may go up but I don’t care . I wait get back to .0005 range if we still pink current
Bought them Long time ago
There are many more judgments and note holders as well, probably another 10 -15 million. Not to mention the fraud and issues with disclosure and regulatory agencies, FINRA and the SEC.
And Brett Rosen also still has 420.266,667 of converted unrestricted free trading shares. Who knows how many of those he has left.
.
Buyer Beware
..
Followers
|
681
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
90771
|
Created
|
08/12/18
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators tdbowieknife |
OPTEC HAS 2 BUSINESS SEGMENTS
ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT to KILL GERMS/VIRUSES
AND
FUEL OPTIMIZERS
1. ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT to KILL GERMS/VIRUSES
Below are pictures of 2 OPTI UV products for both Commercial and Personal use to KILL GERMS/VIRUSES and
describe how $OPTI UV Light technology work and June 12, 2020 abc NEWS on how UV light is used to kill germs/viruses.
1. For Commercial use : OPTEC ROVER: UV-C LED Germicidal Lamp
2. For Personal/Individual use : iWand
3. How UV Light technology work.
4. June 12, 2020, abc NEWS link on that UV light to kill germs/viruses.
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/hotels-uv-light-robots-lamps-protect-coronavirus/story?id=71205829
All above DD can be found here.
https://optecuvc.com/
FUEL OPTIMIZERS
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |