Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Registration Revoked by SEC **
SECURITY DELETIONS
Dl Date Symbol Company Name Effective Date/Comments
7/15/2008 ONCR Oncor, Inc. Common Stock 7/16/2008 12(j) Registration Revoked by SEC **
http://www.otcbb.com/asp/dailylist_search.asp?DirectSymbol=ONCR&OTCBB=ALL
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Release No. 57867 / May 27, 2008
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SUSPENDS TRADING IN ELEVEN ISSUERS BASED ON A LACK OF CURRENT AND ACCURATE INFORMATION
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading in the securities of the following eleven issuers, commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 27, 2008 and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on June 9, 2008:
•
e.Spire Communications, Inc. (ESPIQ)
•
Empire of Carolina, Inc. (EMPIQ)
•
Genfinity Corp. (GFIN)
•
GSI Securitization Ltd. (n/k/a GSI Securitization, Inc.) (GSII)
•
Interliant, Inc. (n/k/a I Successor Corp.) (ILNTQ)
•
Namibian Minerals Corp. (NMCOF)
•
Nix Co., Ltd. (n/k/a Global Energy Resources, Inc.) (GERI)
•
Number Nine Visual Technology Corp. (n/k/a International Precious Minerals Group, Inc.) (IPMG)
•
NVID International, Inc. (NVID)
•
Oncor, Inc. (ONCR)
•
USCI, Inc. (USCM)
The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of these issuers due to a lack of current and accurate information about the companies because they have failed to file certain periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).
The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available information and any information subsequently issued by these companies.
This one looks nice, Monday should be big IMHO
Ameritrade not allowing buys online with this one. I just tried to pick up a few .0045's
So I take it this article is incorrect??
Texas Energy Future Holdings, Limited Partnership (TEF) today made an initial filing with the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC) setting forth its commitments regarding TXU Electric Delivery (to be renamed Oncor). These commitments will be binding upon successful completion of the acquisition of TXU Corp. TEF is the holding company formed by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR), Texas Pacific Group (TPG) and other investors to acquire TXU Corp.
This voluntarily expedited initial filing means the PUC will have direct authority to hold the investors legally accountable to their commitments once the transaction closes.
"We want the PUC to oversee our investment in Oncor," said Michael MacDougall of TPG. "We want our commitments to have the force of law behind them. We know that we will keep our commitments, and we understand that it is important to have the PUC hold us accountable."
TEF made its filing today with the PUC in anticipation of its voluntarily expedited 14.101 filing, which allows the PUC to review the buyout transaction. That filing will be made no later than April 25, 2007.
"We made this legally binding commitment of filing voluntarily because we believe it is important for the people of Texas to know our intentions," said Fred Goltz, KKR.
TEF is legally committing to hold a majority of its ownership stake, in the current regulatory system, for a minimum of five years, and committing that TXU Electric Delivery will not incur, guaranty or pledge assets in respect of any borrowing related to financing the merger transaction. TEF is also committing to establish a separate board for each of TXU's three operating companies and to make substantial investments in new energy efficiency programs. More details on those commitments are listed below.
The PUC filing includes the following commitments by TEF:
* On or before closing of the transaction, the name of TXU Electric
Delivery will be changed to Oncor Electric Delivery Company. Oncor's
logo will be separate and distinct from the logos of the parent, TXU
Corp.; the retail electric provider, TXU Energy; and the power
generation company, Luminant Energy.
* At closing and thereafter, Oncor will have a separate board of
directors that will not include any members from the boards of
directors of TXU Energy or Luminant.
* Within a reasonable transition period after closing of the merger
transaction, not to exceed six months, Oncor's headquarters will be
located in a separate building from the headquarters and operations of
TXU Energy and Luminant.
* Oncor will not incur, guaranty or pledge assets in respect of any
borrowing related to financing the merger transaction. Oncor's
financial integrity will be protected from the separate operations of
TXU Energy and Luminant.
* TEF will limit Oncor's debt so that its debt-to-equity ratio is at or
below the assumed debt-to-equity ratio established from time to time
by the Commission for ratemaking purposes, which is currently set at
60:40. For ratemaking purposes, in its next rate case Oncor will
support a cost of debt that does not exceed Oncor's actual cost of
debt immediately prior to the announcement of the proposed merger
transaction.
* Following the closing of the proposed transaction, TEF intends for
Oncor to continue to make capital expenditures at or above current
levels. Total capital spending will depend in part on economic growth,
permitting and siting. However, TEF commits that over the five years
following the year in which closing of the proposed transaction
occurs, Oncor will make capital expenditures in connection with its
transmission and distribution business in an aggregate amount of more
than $3.0 billion.
* Over the five years following the year in which closing occurs,
subsidiaries of TXU Corp. will expend an aggregate of at least
$200 million on demand-side management/energy efficiency programs over
the amount included by the Commission in Oncor's rates. This
commitment will approximately double Electric Delivery's current level
of spending on DSM. Oncor will not seek to recover in rates any of
the $200 million in incremental DSM expenditures.
* Oncor will support the inclusion of negotiated commitments with
appropriate stakeholders regarding reliability, customer service and
employee safety in any Final Order regarding the merger transaction
issued pursuant to PURA Section 14.101.
* Oncor will file a general rate case at the Commission before July 1,
2008, consistent with the utility's currently effective settlement
agreement with certain municipalities.
* TEF will hold a majority of its ownership interest in Oncor, in the
current regulatory system, for a period of more than five years after
the closing date of its proposed merger transaction.
A copy of the PUC filing is available at http://www.texasenergyfuture.com or by emailing Jeff Eller at jeff.eller@texasenergyfuture.com
Contact: Jeff Eller
Texas Energy Future Holdings Limited Partnership
512-432-1760
jeff.eller@texasenergyfuture.com
ONCR buys not coming from Ihub must be coming from somewhere else.
ONCR must be a reverse merger or something volume interest all of a sudden.
ONCR 0.0045 up 28% something is happening behind the scenes.
LOL. You like low floaters? i got a HOT one for you. i will PM it to you in the next 24 hours. BLUE
the forbes article was 1 month old. Why will it pop now because of that? but maybe it was us who caused the spike.lol
the spike was probably caused by you and your buddies buying it on that Forbes article. LOL.
How many shares of this do you own? I'm trying to figure whether it is your purchase that made it spike or, whether it is the MMs. You could have a point though.
OK. I hope the loto play will work for you.
Not really an investment for me, Just a lotto play.
Don't invest in a shell unless there is a PR from the company to prove so. GO to shellreview.com and you will see a bunch of shells trading. It doesn't mean that there is a reverse merger about to happen.
I know about those, The shells that are about to reverse merge are the ones that are being played not all of them.
if you haven't noticed, there is a trend now of picking low floater and pumping them with rumors of short squeeze, particular already bankrupted pinnkies are the victims of such. Today's purchase is only worth $5,000. Anyone can buy that. If there was anything special about this stock, the purchase could have been valued over $50,000.IMO. Be careful with low floaters. DEXTQ should serve as an example of what is going on.
but why today? why not yesterday or last week? I still think something is happening that we don't know about.
because it is cheap and has no recent activity. You can do that with any shell. Look at EANW, it goes up 34% on 3000 of buys. When selling 500 shares, the stock could easily come down 50% IMO.
Cool! so why did ONCR spike today? up 75% there must be another reason. Volume surge all of a sudden.
I THINK THEY ARE NOT RELATED IMO. Oncor Electric Delivery
I was hoping it will be a reverse merger. So what caused the ONCR spike today? maybe a r/m is about to happen.
Just look at the old SEC filings and you can see this is not a subsidiary of TXU. I wish we had stumbled onto a subsidiary of TXU trading on the PINKS!!!!
Feb 26, 2007 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX) -- Morning Alert for TXU Corp (NYSE:TXU)
TXU's core curriculum is electricity. The company is the largest nonregulated retail electric provider in Texas, with more than 2.3 million customers, and it has a generating capacity of more than 18,300 MW from its interests in nuclear and fossil-fueled power plants in the state. TXU also has regulated power transmission and distribution operations through TXU Electric Delivery (formerly Oncor Electric Delivery). Other operations include wholesale energy marketing and coal mining. TXU is divesting noncore assets, including its international energy businesses; it has sold its natural gas utility, TXU Gas, which served 1.4 million customers in Texas.
TXU Electric Delivery
As the name suggests, Oncor, a TXU company, is repeating the performance of our predecessor company, TXU Electric & Gas. We provide the same seamless and dependable energy delivery service that energy consumers have come to expect for more than a century. Even though our new name signals an exciting phase for our new business, some things -- some very important things -- never change. Namely, we are the same dependable and knowledgeable experts who inevitably find flexible solutions for our customers. Oncor will continue to deliver both electricity and natural gas, and our past performance has played to rave reviews. But over the years, we've built up a huge base of knowledge on how best to manage and operate an energy delivery organization. Now, we're out to share that knowledge through a new competitive business -- Oncor Utility Solutions. By drawing from a vast store of experience, Utility Solutions will partner with all types of utilities and change the way they work.
12/15/2004 Link URL
Job Opportunities
Current Positions at TXU, Oncore's parent company
FROM OLD SEC FILING:
ONCOR, INC.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. BANKRUPTCY AND BUSINESS CHANGES
Chapter 11 Filing
On February 26, 1999 (the "Petition Date"), Oncor, Inc. and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Codon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively, the
"Debtors"), filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United
States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") with the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware. Under Chapter 11, certain claims
against the Debtors in existence prior to the filing of the petitions for relief
under the Bankruptcy Code are stayed while the Debtors continues as
Debtors-in-Possession.
ONCR article from forbes u decide if its fake or not!
http://www.forbes.com/2007/02/27/txu-power-generating-biz-washington-cx_bw_0228txu.html?partner=yaho...
check out the bottom of the article!
"More On This Topic
Companies: TX | GS | ONCR.PK
E-Mail Newsletters: Sign Up Now To Stay Informed On A Range Of Topics
Attaché: Customize Forbes.com Now To Track This Author And Industry"
"So where does this leave TXU? The company's individual business units--which were separated into generation, distribution and retail companies under Texas' deregulation law--will now become even more distinct, with separate boards of directors. The company’s generation business will be known as Luminant Energy, its electric delivery business as Oncor (other-otc: ONCR - news - people ) Electric Delivery. Its retail unit will remain TXU Energy."
so which one is the right one?
probably because Altomare told them to put it there, not the case here.
First Call put out the USXP thing!
It's from forbes not from some pump n' dump news feeder.lol.
Here's all they have to do to help you out lol
#msg-16991935
I'm just going by the forbes article. If that's correct then it's huge if not then I lose everything. http://www.forbes.com/2007/02/27/txu-power-generating-biz-washington-cx_bw_0228txu.html?partner=yaho...
yep! lotto play as in very high risk .
The greater fool theory in action.
Good luck.
I'm already in. So I'll just hold onto my shares and let's see what happens. Just a Lotto play for me.
I already did.
ONCOR, INC.
(Debtor-In-Possession)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. BANKRUPTCY AND BUSINESS CHANGES
Chapter 11 Filing
On February 26, 1999 (the "Petition Date"), Oncor, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Codon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively, the "Debtors"), filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware. Under Chapter 11, certain claims against the Debtors in existence prior to the filing of the petitions for relief under the Bankruptcy Code are stayed while the Debtors continues as Debtors-in-Possession.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, all actions to collect upon any of the Company's liabilities as of the Petition Date or to enforce pre-petition contractual obligations were automatically stayed. Absent approval from the Bankruptcy Court, the Company is prohibited from paying pre- petition obligations. However, the Bankruptcy Court has approved payment of certain pre-petition liabilities as of the Petition Date such as employee wages and benefits and certain specified pre-petition obligations. Additionally, the Bankruptcy Court has allowed for the retention of legal and financial professionals and other payments to protect the holders of claims against the Company. As debtors-in-possession, the Company has the right, subject to Bankruptcy Court approval and certain other conditions, to assume or reject any pre-petition executory contracts and unexpired leases. Parties affected by such rejections may file pre-petition claims with the Bankruptcy Court in accordance with Bankruptcy procedures.
This reminds me of USXP a few weeks ago.
One little error in a news article.
ONCR -- Oncor, Inc.
Com (1 Cent)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
Current Report Pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 7, 2000
Oncor, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Maryland
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
0-16177 52-1310084
------------------------------ ---------------------------------------
(Commission File Number) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
15200 Shady Grove Road, Rockville, Maryland 20850
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(301) 527-2222
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
N.A.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item 3. Bankruptcy or Receivership
On April 7, 2000, the Second Amended Liquidating Chapter 11 Plans (the "Plans") of Oncor, Inc. (the "Company") and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Codon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Codon") became effective. An order confirming the Plans, pursuant to section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code, dated February 29, 2000, had previously been entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on March 7, 2000. The Company and Codon originally filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on February 26, 1999.
The Company's Plan provides for the liquidation of all assets of the Company and the cancellation of all equity interests in the Company. In addition, the Plan provides for the payment of administrative expenses and priority tax claims in cash in full, and for the partial payments of all other claims (other than those related to the Company's equity interests).
Item 7. Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits
(c) Exhibits
99.1 Confirmation Order pursuant to section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code, dated February 29, 2000, entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on March 7, 2000, confirming Oncor, Inc.'s and Codon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Second Amended Liquidating Chapter 11 Plans (In re: Codon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Oncor, Inc., Case No. 99-436).
99.2 Press release dated April 13, 2000 announcing that on April 7, 2000 the Second Amended Liquidating Chapter 11 Plan of Oncor, Inc. became effective.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Oncor, Inc.
(Registrant)
By: /s/ Joseph R. Shaya
----------------------------------
Name: Joseph R. Shaya
Title: Acting President and Chief Executive
Officer
Dated: April 14, 2000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 99.1
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
In re: ) Chapter 11
)
CODON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. )
and ONCOR, INC., ) Case No. 99-436(JJF)
)
Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered)
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER CONFIRMING
SECOND AMENDED LIQUIDATING CHAPTER 11 PLANS OF ONCOR, INC. AND CODON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Oncor, Inc. ("Oncor") having filed its Second Amended Liquidating Chapter 11 Plan of Oncor, Inc. dated November 12, 1999 (the "Oncor Plan") and Codon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Codon") having filed its Second Amended Liquidating Chapter 11 Plan of Codon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. dated November 12, 1999 (the "Codon Plan" and, collectively, with the Oncor Plan, the "Plans") in accordance with section 1121 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"); and Oncor and Codon (collectively, the "Debtors") having filed their Second Amended Joint Disclosure Statement pursuant to section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code relating to the Plans on November 12, 1999 (the "Disclosure Statement"); and the Court, by Order dated November 15, 1999 (the "Disclosure Approval Order") having approved the Disclosure Statement after notice and a hearing held on November 10, 1999; and upon the affidavits and certificates of service filed herein reflecting compliance with the notice and solicitation requirements of the Bankruptcy Code and the Federal Rules of
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Procedure (the "Bankruptcy Rules"); and upon the Certified Ballot Reports for Oncor and Codon filed on February 25, 2000; and objections to confirmation of the Oncor Plan having been filed by (i) NTFC Capital Corporation ("NTFC") and (ii) Themis Partners L.P. and Heracles Fund (collectively, the "Confirmation Objections"); and NTFC having withdrawn its objection pursuant to a Stipulation Under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9019(a) Approving Settlement and Resolution of Claim of NTFC Capital Corporation; and the Court having considered and approved the Debtors' Motion For An Order (a) Approving Settlement With Themis Partners L.P. and Heracles Fund, (b) Authorizing Change of Votes On Amended Liquidating Chapter 11 Plan of Oncor, Inc. and (c) Approving Technical Plan Modifications (the "Modification Motion"); and the Debtors having filed technical modifications to the Plans (the "Technical Modifications"), in accordance with the Modification Motion and certain other agreements achieved with parties in interest; and after a hearing having been held on February 29, 2000 (the "Confirmation Hearing") where the Court considered (i) confirmation of the Plans (as amended by the Technical Modifications) and (ii) the withdrawal or settlement of the Confirmation Objections; and notice of the Confirmation Hearing being deemed good and sufficient notice of the Technical Modifications; and the Court having reviewed all documents in connection with confirmation of the Plans and having heard all parties desiring to be heard; and upon the record compiled in the cases and made at the Confirmation Hearing; and after due deliberation and consideration of all of the foregoing; and sufficient cause appearing therefor; the Court hereby makes the following:
-2-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Capitalized terms used herein, but not defined herein, shall have the respective meanings attributed to such terms in the Plans and the Disclosure Statement.
B. This Court has jurisdiction over the Debtors' chapter 11 cases pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sections 1334(a) and 157(1). Venue of these proceedings and the chapter 11 cases in this district is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sections 1408 and 1409. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 157(b)(2) and this Court has jurisdiction to enter a final order with respect hereto.
C. Due, timely, sufficient and adequate notice of the Plans, the Confirmation Hearing, the Technical Modifications and the deadlines for voting on, and filing objections to, the Plans has been given to all known holders of Claims in an impaired class entitled to vote on the Plans, in accordance with the procedures established by the Disclosure Approval Order, the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules, the local rules of the Court and all other applicable laws, rules and regulations.
D. The Plans comply with all of the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.
E. The classification of claims and interests under the Plans is proper under sections 1122 and 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code. Claims or Interests in each particular Class are substantially similar to other Claims or Interests contained in such Class.
-3-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F. Consistent with section 1123(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Plans provide equal treatment for each Claim or Interest of a particular class, unless a holder of a Claim or Interest has agreed with one of the Debtors to a less favorable treatment.
G. The Debtors, as proponents of the Plans, have complied with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.
H. The Plans have been proposed in good faith and not by any means forbidden by law.
I. Any payments made or promised by the Debtors, or a person issuing securities or acquiring property under the Plans, for services or for costs and expenses in, or in connection with, the cases, or in connection with the Plans and incident to the cases, have been approved by, or is subject to approval of the Court as reasonable.
J. The Debtors have disclosed that Joseph R. Shaya, the current Acting President and Chief Executive Officer of each of the Debtors, will serve as Plan Agent and the sole director and officer of the Post-Confirmation Debtors as of the Effective Date of the Plans and have disclosed the Plan Agent's compensation. The appointment of the Plan Agent is consistent with the interests of the Debtors' creditors and equity security holders and with public policy. In addition, the Debtors have disclosed the identity of the members of the Post-Effective Date Committee to serve under the Plans.
K. The provisions of section 1129(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code are inapplicable to these cases.
-4-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L. The procedures by which the ballots for acceptance or rejection of the Plans were distributed and tabulated were fair, properly conducted, and complied with the Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Rules.
M. As required by section 1129(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code, with respect to each impaired Class of Claims and Interests, each holder of a Claim or Interest in each impaired Class has either accepted such Plan or will receive or retain under such Plan property of a value, as of the Effective Date of the Plans, that is not less than the amount that such holder would receive or retain if the Debtors liquidated under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on such date.
N. With respect to Classes 1, 2 and 3 under the Oncor Plan, such class has accepted the Oncor Plan or such class is not impaired under the Oncor Plan and is, therefore, deemed to have accepted the Oncor Plan under section 1126(f) of the Bankruptcy Code.
O. With respect to Classes 4 and 5 under the Oncor Plan, the requirements of sections 1129(b)(2)(B) and 1129(b)(2)(C) of the Bankruptcy Code, respectively, have been satisfied.
P. With respect to Class 1 under the Oncor Plan, such class has accepted the Codon Plan.
Q. With respect to Class 2 interests under the Codon Plan, the requirements of section 1129(b)(2)(C) of the Bankruptcy Code have been satisfied.
R. The Debtors have requested that the Court confirm the Plans under section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code as to Oncor Classes 4 and 5 and Codon Class 2.
-5-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S. At least one impaired class of claims has accepted each of the Plans, determined without including any acceptances of the Plans by any insider.
T. Except to the extent that the holder of a particular claim has agreed to a different treatment of such Claim, the treatment of Claims under the Plans of the type specified in sections 507(a)(1) and 507(a)(3) through 507(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code, if any, complies with the provisions of section 1129(a)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code.
U. The primary purpose of each of the Plans is not the avoidance of taxes or the requirements of section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933.
V. Confirmation of the Plans is not likely to be followed by the need for further financial reorganizations of the Debtors.
W. All fees payable under section 1930 of title 28 of the United States Code, have either been paid or will be paid under the Plans.
X. The provisions of section 1129(a)(13) of the Bankruptcy Code are inapplicable to these cases.
Y. The Plans are the only plans of reorganization for each of the Debtors pending before this or any other Court.
Z. The Technical Modifications to the Plans proposed by the Debtors prior to, at or in connection with the Confirmation Hearing as set forth below in this Confirmation Order, have been reviewed by and consented to by the Debtors' Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors. The Technical Modifications do not adversely change the treatment of holders of Claims against the Debtors. Consequently, in accordance with section 1127 of the Bankruptcy Code and
-6-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Rule 3019, the Plans as modified are deemed accepted by each holder of a Claim against the Debtors that voted to accept the Plans, without the need to resolicit the votes of such Creditors on the Plans as modified, and are deemed accepted by each holder of an unimpaired Claim deemed to have accepted the Plans in accordance with section 1126(f) of the Bankruptcy Code.
NOW, it is hereby,
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED, that:
1. The Plans are confirmed pursuant to section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code; provided, however, that if there is any conflict between the terms of the Plans and the terms of this Confirmation Order, this Confirmation Order shall control.
2. The Stipulation of Settlement Between and Among the Debtors, the Committee, Themis Partners L.P. ("Themis") and Heracles Fund ("Heracles") Relating to Second Amended Liquidating Chapter 11 Plan of Oncor, Inc. is hereby approved, and the Confirmation Objection filed by Themis and Heracles is withdrawn pursuant thereto.
3. The Plans are hereby modified as follows:
(a) Section 5.4 of the Oncor Plan is amended by the deletion of the current text of section 5.4 of the Oncor Plan and the insertion of the following language:
The holders of Allowed Subordinated Promethean Unsecured Claims will receive a Pro Rata Share of $75,000, plus the portion of the Distributable Cash, if any, remaining after all Allowed unclassified Claims and Allowed Claims in Classes 1 through 3 are paid in full, in full and final settlement of their Claims.
-7-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Section 5.3 of the Oncor Plan is amended and modified by adding two new sentences at the end of such section which state as follows:
The Claims of Yale University ("Yale") shall be withdrawn pursuant to a settlement (the "Yale Settlement") providing for the Debtors' transfer of certain licensed inventions and/or technology to Yale. The Debtors will seek approval of a stipulation evidencing the Yale Settlement after the Confirmation Date, on notice to interest parties.
(c) Section 5.1 of the Codon Plan is amended and modified by adding two new sentences at the end of such section which state as follows:
The Claims of Yale University ("Yale") shall be withdrawn pursuant to a settlement (the "Yale Settlement") providing for the Debtors' transfer of certain licensed inventions and/or technology to Yale. The Debtors will seek approval of a stipulation evidencing the Yale Settlement after the Confirmation Date, on notice to interested parties.
4. Prior to the Effective Date, the Debtors are hereby authorized, empowered, and ordered to issue, execute, deliver, file and record any documents or court papers or pleadings, and to take any and all actions, that are necessary or desirable to implement, effectuate, and consummate the transactions contemplated by the Plans, whether or not specifically referred to therein and without further application or order of this Court, in each case with like effect as if exercised and taken by unanimous action of the director and/or stockholder of the Debtors as may be necessary to cause the same to become effective under state law.
5. The Debtors shall remain as debtors-in-possession under the Bankruptcy Code until the Effective Date. Thereafter, the Post-Confirmation Debtors and the Post-Effective Date Committee may consummate the transactions
-8-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
contemplated by the Plans and make distributions to creditors after the Effective Date in accordance with the Plans, free of any restrictions imposed by the Bankruptcy Code. The Post-Effective Date Committee shall have the rights, powers and obligations as set forth in the Plans, including but not limited to, the right to retain counsel and the Plan Agent.
6. The Plan Agent Agreement, substantially in the form previously filed with the Court, is approved, and the Debtors and the Post-Effective Date Committee may execute, enter into and deliver such documents and to execute, implement and consummate any transactions contemplated thereby.
7. Any and all pre-petition unexpired leases and executory contracts not previously rejected by the Debtors or pursuant to section 365(d)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, unless specifically assumed pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code prior to the date hereof or the subject of a motion to assume and assign pending on the date hereof, shall be deemed rejected by the Debtors effective as of the date of this Order.
8. All proofs of claim with respect to claims arising from the rejection of executory contracts and unexpired leases shall, unless another order of the Bankruptcy Court provides for an earlier date, be filed with the Bankruptcy Court within thirty (30) days after notice of entry of this Order. Any proof of claim that is not timely filed shall be released, discharged and forever barred from assertion against the Debtors, their estates or properties or the Post-Confirmation Debtors.
9. The exculpations, limited releases and injunction provisions set forth in the Plans are approved.
-9-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plans to the contrary, the Post-Effective Date Committee, on behalf of the Post-Confirmation Debtors, may file Objections to Claims no later than ninety (90) days after the Effective Date or ninety (90) days after a particular proof of Claim is filed, whichever is later.
11. Unless required to be filed by an earlier date by another order of this Court, all requests for payment of Administrative Claims must be filed and served on the Post-Confirmation Debtors, their counsel and the Post-Effective Date Committee's counsel, no later than twenty (20) days after the Effective Date. Any person that is required to file and serve such a request for payment of an Administrative Claim and fails to timely file and serve such request, shall be forever barred, estopped and enjoined from asserting such Claim or participating in distribution under the Plan on account thereof.
12. Each Person asserting a Fee Claim shall file with the Bankruptcy Court and serve on the United States Trustee, counsel to the Post-Effective Date Committee and counsel to the Post-Confirmation Debtors, a Fee Application within sixty (60) days after the Effective Date. Failure to file a Fee Application timely shall result in the Fee Claim being forever barred and discharged.
13. This Order shall constitute all approvals and consents required, if any, by the laws, rules or regulations of any state or any other governmental authority with respect to the implementation or consummation of the Plans and any other acts that may be necessary or appropriate for the implementation or consummation of the Plan.
14. Pursuant to Section 1146(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, neither the making nor delivery of an instrument of transfer, nor the revesting, transfer and sale of
-10-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
any real property or personal property of the Debtors in accordance with the Plans, shall subject the Debtors or the Post-Confirmation Debtors to any state or local law imposing a stamp tax, transfer tax or similar tax or fee.
15. The provisions of the Plans and this Order shall be, and hereby are now, and forever afterwards, binding on the Debtors, the Committee, the Post-Confirmation Debtors, the Post-Effective Date Committee, all holders of Claims and Interests (whether or not impaired under the Plans and whether or not, if impaired, they accepted the Plans), any other party in interest, any other party making an appearance in these chapter 11 cases, and any other person or entity affected thereby, as well as their respective heirs, successors, assigns, trustees, subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors, agents, employees, representatives, attorneys, beneficiaries, guardians, and similar officers, or any person claiming through or in the right of any such person or entity.
16. The Court hereby retains jurisdiction of these cases (i) as provided for in the Plans, (ii) as provided for in this Order, and (iii) for the purposes set forth in sections 1127 and 1142 of the Bankruptcy Code.
17. The failure specifically to include or reference particular sections or provisions of the Plans or any related agreement in this Order shall not diminish or impair the effectiveness of such sections or provisions, it being the intent of the Court that the Plans be confirmed and such related agreements be approved in their entirety.
-11-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
18. Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rules 2002(f)(7) and 3020(c), the Debtors are hereby directed to serve a notice of the entry of this Order on all holders of record of Claims and Interests as of the date hereof, all parties who have entered their appearance in these cases and requested notice pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002 and the Office of the United States Trustee, no later than ten (10) days after the Effective Date of the Plans.
Dated: Wilmington, Delaware
February 29, 2000
/s/ Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
----------------------------------
Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
Chief United States District Judge
-12-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 99.2
Oncor, Inc.
15200 Shady Grove Road Suite 350
Rockville, MD 20850
PRESS RELEASE
Rockville, Md., April 13, 2000
On April 7, 2000 the Second Amended Liquidating Chapter 11 Plan of Oncor, Inc. (the "Plan") became effective. An order was previously entered on February 29, 2000 by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware confirming the Plan. The Plan provides for the liquidation of all assets of the company and the cancellation of all equity interests in the company. The Plan further provides for a Post-Effective Date Committee to oversee the implementation of the terms thereof. This committee is represented by the law firm of Anderson Kill and Olick, P.C., 1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10020.
On February 26, 1999, Oncor, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Codon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.
04/13/00
Contact: Mr. Joseph R. Shaya for Oncor and Codon
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/print_filings.jsp?url=%2Fredirect.asp%3Ffilename%3D0000950116%252D00...
that's a tough call. but I'll go with forbes for now. Unless u can prove them wrong. lol.
Forbes, Pee Wee Herman or DrWorm. Who do you believe?
it was from forbes article. maybe, maybe not .
That story is incorrect.
It says other OTC Oncor and right ticker ONCR "The company’s generation business will be known as Luminant Energy, its electric delivery business as Oncor (other-otc: ONCR - news - people ) Electric Delivery. Its retail unit will remain TXU Energy."
still doing more dd.
Followers
|
2
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
53
|
Created
|
04/04/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |