Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Also you need this too: conix, Denial is the one thing you excel in. Your Republicans and your President caused the death of millions of Americans.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172346522
KAMALA HARRIS: “When we invest in clean energy and electric vehicles and reduce population, more of our children can breath clean air and drink clean water.”
This cunt is your VP and possibly your next POTUS
https://twitter.com/rncresearch/status/1679988366618624000?s=46&t=o10SC151sKynjB00xpl-Hg
Yeah, but he's never going to admit it, so screw him.
yep, lottery tickets
dickhead that posts on this board can't deny this data
population with disabilities, 16 years and older
One of the most disturbing temporal trends in pubic data. Most new disabilities in my practice are a consequence of COVID-19 vaccination (heart damage, neurological conditions, stroke, blood clots). #courageousdiscourse Do others concur? @drdrew @DrLoupis @BenMarble_MD pic.twitter.com/QAT2BLv7Yw
— Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® (@P_McCulloughMD) July 12, 2023
lottery tickets????
I did find it odd they said kids didn't need them.
FWIW, in the back of my mind is the thought that by giving Covid shots to the elderly, would be a great cure for concerns social security will run out of funds in the near future.
Look at you! You see, it is possible for you to answer questions!
As to me researching your posts, reading them once was enough. Put me on payroll and I'll do your investigative work for you, however, you've been answering questions with questions forever and I surely wouldn't have brought it up if not true. I don't go around accusing others of this heinous act.
FWIW, Trump was way ahead in the polls before Covid (not that I would have voted for him), but if you're looking for a reason why liberals would have been pushing the Covid card, that's as good a reason as any.
I always thought it stupid that Trump got slammed as to how he handled Covid, considering it was a completely new issue for the country and his first response was to not allow the Chinese into the country and got slammed for it. Meanwhile, the end result was many countries, banned visitors.
I'll check it out
Ddf Watch Biden Sides With Iran Against Israel
https://rumble.com/v2zwkce-biden-sides-with-iran-against-israel.html
Financial Collapse! This Is Happening In GOLD & SILVER Market ! | Bill Holter Latest Interview
Wisely Invest 7.65K subscriber
everything that was told about the vaxx was a lie.
Did you find it odd you were offered lottery tickets to take the jab?
I also don't trust either side.
fung_derf To your "Here's a better question for you, do you believe Trump would have been re-elected if not for Covid?"
I don't know. His domestic policies, as tariffs, increased prices for all and his foreign policies pissed off most all but Putin and other authoritarian leaders of the globe. His lies and unethical behavior should have said he wouldn't have been.
"Since you're going to respond by bringing up a totally arbitrary topic and not answer the question (as you've done to me many times in the past)."
Crap. Typical conservative troll talk from you, telling another what they will do. Give me a link to even one where i have not answered a question of yours. Strawman much.
"I'll play that game as well.....Do you believe in God? Do you believe in Jesus? Do you believe Mary was a virgin? Do you believe eggs are bad for you? Do you believe in the Big Bang theory?"
You always do, yet i don't think you could give me a link to a post where i have.
To your questions which you would know my answers to if you had taken the trouble to search my posts.
No, don't believe in either the Christian, the Muslim or any such imaginary Gods.
Science says human females do not make babies on impregnation by an angel. So no not a virgin if she bore Jesus.
Eggs no i don't see as bad for me. In plants the sexual organs are stamens and pistils ..
https://letstalkscience.ca/educational-resources/backgrounders/plant-reproduction .
The Big Bang theory beats the creationist model to hell. Until a better theory comes along it will do me as the best theory about. Don't believe in your heaven and hell either.
How about you. Could you now answer your questions as if they had put to you. In reply to this post would be good. If you would.
Here's a better question for you, do you believe Trump would have been re-elected if not for Covid?
Since you're going to respond by bringing up a totally arbitrary topic and not answer the question (as you've done to me many times in the past).
I'll play that game as well.....Do you believe in God? Do you believe in Jesus? Do you believe Mary was a virgin? Do you believe eggs are bad for you? Do you believe in the Big Bang theory?
Do you believe most climate scientists are lying about human influence on climate too? In
your mind is it ALL about the money some are making from the new energy technologies?
Man, don't put me in the middle of a political argument. I don't trust either side.
democrats
.@Jim_Jordan: "Did the FBI ask financial institutions to turn over their customers' debit and credit card purchase history in the Washington DC area for January 5-6th, 2021?"
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) July 12, 2023
WRAY: "I don't know the answer."
JORDAN: "We do. Because Bank of America gave us this email from FBI to… pic.twitter.com/GSpiGd6zJt
And why isn't that enough for you? You think you'll now be getting a dinner invitation from him?
The motto of IHUB should be....."You know, you're arguing with strangers, right?"
yeah safe and effective,
stops transmission
you won't catch it again
you won't go to the hospital
you'll need a second shot..
you'll need a booster
you'll need this shot forever
you don't need a mask
you need a mask
two weeks
they yanked your chain
But I've been right all along.
Well, you both are.
I don't know if you guys do this on other boards as well, but to be fair, you instigated this last one. I just can't figure out why. Are you going to this guy's house for dinner later?
I'd say it's very convenient for a group who required you to take a vaccine also releases a study claiming side effects are rare. Here is a doctor who stated, quite clearly and plainly, that he has seen a rise in cases due to the Covid vaccine. If one hospital is seeing several cases, multiply that by all hospitals.
Unless, of course, you believe they are limited the vaccine to just trying to thin out the herd in my area.
One thing I've found since the advent of the internet, people will seek out those reports or answers that only support their viewpoint. In the past, we used to call it "getting a second opinion".
Tell the truth, I've read enough of your responses on here, you would NEVER admit that you may have been wrong about the Covid vaccine. Neither of you will.
In the old days of debate club, they'd always have us take the opposing side of what we believed. Too bad the internet doesn't require that. Read the theory below.
fung_derf, Hope your guy's problem isn't serious. And hope the doctor involved is a responsible guy when it
comes to questions of covid and it's vaccines. As you know, as far as the best available evidence suggests
Does the Covid-19 vaccine cause myocarditis (heart inflammation)?
There have been rare cases of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) following the Moderna and the Pfizer vaccine in the UK, and it has been listed as a very rare side effect.
Myocarditis has also been listed as a rare possible side effect of the Novavax vaccine, after a very small number of cases were reported during clinical trials.
For every million doses given of the monovalent Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, there have been 10 reports of myocarditis and 6 reports of pericarditis, according to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (as of 23 November 2022). There have been 14 reports of myocarditis and 8 reports of pericarditis for every million doses given of the monovalent Moderna vaccine over the same period.
While reports of myocarditis following any Covid-19 vaccine are rare, cases are more common in young males aged 18 to 29 years following the second dose. Most people who have been affected have experienced a mild illness and recovered without medical treatment.
https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/heart-matters-magazine/news/coronavirus-and-your-health/coronavirus-vaccine-your-questions-answered/myocarditis-and-covid-19-vaccines-should-you-be-worried
See also:
Vaccine Scientist Peter Hotez Says He Was 'Stalked' After Billionaires—And Joe Rogan—Urge Him To Debate RFK Jr.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172164315
News flash!! Someone died of a heart attack. Yeah. It happens. It's been happening to humans long before the first vaccination for anything was developed and distributed. And no vaccination has ever been perfect. And about all meds (including vaccinations) have side effects. And some people have pre-existing problems, unknown even, which could produce an unexpected and rare, even fatal, reaction to vaccination. Even young fit people. First posted here - dropdeadfred, News flash!!... https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171312731
[...]
Those obvious and factual points made to you, yet again, there is more:
"Fact Check-Study using Israeli emergency services data does not prove COVID-19 vaccines cause heart problems
"Benefits of COVID-19 Vaccination Outweigh the Rare Risk of Myocarditis, Even in Young Males
"[...]Fact Check-Bill Gates did not say COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective"""
Why Are Heart Attacks on the Rise in Young People?
February 9, 2023 / Heart Health
Sedentary lifestyles are driving up heart attack numbers in the under-40 crowd
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171312841
You've got to know you're wasting your time, right?
Do you really think he's ever going to say, "Oh DDF, you were right all along!"?
One of our guys at the golf course passed out the other day after the round. The doctor told him, due to Covid shots they're seeing more people with enlarged hearts.
drodeadfred - Your Jay Bhattacharya -- "The results of these relationships? Twitter blacklisted Stanford physician and economist Jay Bhattacharya for showing Covid almost exclusively threatened the elderly, severely reducing the visibility of his tweets." gets a mention here -
Want to cut your risk of serious COVID-19? New data shows vaccines are hitting the mark
[...]
"The people that are, relatively speaking, most at risk of having something bad happen after a breakthrough infection are the same people that are at highest risk of having something bad happen for any infection and for COVID-19," said Deepta Bhattacharya, an immunologist at the University of Arizona in Tucson.
Bhattacharya says that includes people who are immunosuppressed or those who are being treated for autoimmune disorders or certain types of cancer.
[...]
Recent studies show a drop in effectiveness for COVID-19 vaccines, but the lack of information about how severe breakthrough cases were has sparked a debate about whether booster shots are necessary. 2:03
Bhattacharya of the University of Arizona said there's "widespread consensus" about offering extra shots to those groups, with emerging evidence suggesting that seniors should be given additional doses as well.
Bogoch agreed that any booster shot programs should target both the elderly and immunocompromised but not the general public in Canada just yet — despite countries such as the U.S. and Israel already offering third doses to younger residents as well.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=167139949
And here
Why Elon Musk and right-wing pundits are cheering a doctor with questionable vaccine views
The right's new darling is a Stanford doctor who is mistrustful of mRNA vaccines and lockdowns
By Matthew Rozsa Staff Writer
Published December 16, 2022 5:30AM (EST)
Jay Bhattacharya and Elon Musk (Photo illustration by Salon/Getty Images)
All links
You may not know Dr. Jay Bhattacharya's name, but you've likely heard his ideas. That's because some of his lines have become common refrains of many politicians: arguments against pandemic restrictions like vaccines mandates and school closings, which the social media-savvy doctor has railed against. His heterodox views on the pandemic have earned him acolytes, particularly among the right. Among them: Twitter owner and CEO Elon Musk, who met with Bhattacharya on Saturday, and painted Bhattacharya as a man whose views had been wrongly stifled by Twitter prior to Musk purchasing it earlier this year.
Bhattacharya is a Stanford University professor best known for his outspoken opposition to the widespread COVID-19 lockdowns .. https://www.salon.com/2020/11/19/this-doctor-is-popular-among-conservatives--but-his-views-on-lockdowns-are-very-controversial/ , as well as for his recent decision to work with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. According to a recent batch of Twitter documents released to the public, Bhattacharya had been "shadow-banned" by the social media giant during the pre-Musk era. This means that Bhattacharya's posts were de-emphasized by Twitter staff behind the scenes so other users would be significantly less likely to see what he said. The doctor was placed on a so-called Twitter "blacklist," one which Bhattacharya described as having deemed him a "fringe epidemiologist .. https://nypost.com/2022/12/12/elon-musk-invites-blacklisted-stanford-professor-dr-jay-bhattacharya-to-twitter-headquarters/ ." Shadow-banning is characterized by critics as a form of censorship, as it effectively silences the target while they usually remain unaware of (and thus unable to remedy) their situation.
The revelation about Bhattacharya's blacklisting has been embraced by conservatives
as proof that Twitter suppressing conservative voices led to real-world harm.
Right-wing outlets from Fox News to The Wall Street Journal have lined up to defend Bhattacharya, whose shadow-banning was publicly confirmed after The Free Press reporter Bari Weiss published documents given to her by Musk as part of his "Twitter Files" leaks. Weiss, a former New York Times staffer who left the publication for alleged ideological intolerance, argued the virologist was targeted after he "argued that Covid lockdowns would harm children." Bhattacharya, who publicly speculated the shadow-ban had been prompted by "unspecified complaints Twitter received" about one of his tweets promoting focused protection, also expressed outrage at Weiss' report. Last week he told Fox News' commentator Laura Ingraham that the shadow-ban deprived Americans of the opportunity to judge his ideas on their own merits — and possibly avoid needless mass suffering.
"If we had an open discussion, Laura, the schools would not have closed in the fall of 2020. If we had an open discussion, the lockdowns would have been lifted much earlier because the data and evidence behind them was so bad," Bhattacharya claimed to Ingraham last week.
While Bhattacharya's proposal to encourage COVID-19 "focused protection" has led to him being compared to creationists and climate science deniers .. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/great-barrington-declaration/ , he is not wrong about the mental health effects of lockdowns. There is extensive research demonstrating that the school closings and overall lockdown policies .. https://www.salon.com/2022/12/01/the-ruptured-childrens-social-skills-around-the-world-researchers-say/ .. did harm children. For example, a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in April revealed that the pandemic caused "the largest disruption to education in history" and that children suffered from learning loss as a result. Similarly, a pair of recent studies in the journal Longitudinal and Life Course Studies illustrated that children from vulnerable communities suffered disproportionately in their education and health needs from school disruptions.
Not surprisingly, the revelation about Bhattacharya's blacklisting has been embraced by conservatives as proof that Twitter suppressing conservative voices led to real-world harm in the pandemic.
By meeting with Bhattacharya, Musk has initiated a public discussion about both the validity of Bhattacharya's arguments and the degree to which social media platforms should be allowed to censor potential misinformation. (It also occurred before Musk effectively reversed his "free speech absolutist" position by banning a number of mainstream journalists from Twitter.) Adding to the controversy surrounding the doctor, one of the conservatives with whom Bhattacharya is well-liked is DeSantis, a potential 2024 Republican presidential candidate, for whom Bhattacharya is currently serving on a panel to investigate COVID-19 vaccines.
So who is the man that Twitter shadow-banned, and why is the right so up in arms about the revelation?
Related
Joe Rogan does nothing to correct Aaron Rodgers as he trumpets COVID-19 misinformation
https://www.salon.com/2022/08/30/joe-rogan-aaron-rodgers-misinformation/
Born in the Indian city of Calcutta in 1968, Bhattacharya has four degrees from Stanford University (BA, MA, MD and PhD) and currently teaches medicine, health research policy and economics at the same university. As he once recalled to the Stanford Review, he had "always been interested in science generally, particularly chemistry, I was pre-med. I initially only took economics to satisfy an undergraduate requirement but ended up falling in love with it." He also recalled how, since the early days of the HIV pandemic, he has been working in "economic epidemiology," and Bhattacharya's writings reveal interests in both medical science and economic philosophy.
When COVID-19 restrictions became increasingly unpopular, Bhattacharya
emerged as a hero to those who objected to them from the start.
After the pandemic broke out in 2020, Bhattacharya aroused controversy among Stanford liberals as he appeared on right-wing networks like Fox News and Spectator TV to publicly oppose a number of COVID-19 restrictions. Bhattacharya's conservative views are not a secret; he is affiliated with conservative think tanks like the Hoover Institution and the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER), the latter of which sponsored one of Bhattacharya's publications calling for focused protection, or a policy of quarantining targeted groups during a pandemic (as opposed to large lockdowns). Known as the Great Barrington Declaration (because it was signed at AIER headquarters in Great Barrington, Massachusetts), the 2020 document had two academically prominent co-authors, Dr. Sunetra Gupta at the University of Oxford and Dr. Martin Kulldorff of Harvard University. It argued that, because the COVID-19 lockdowns were causing psychological and physical harm, only vulnerable populations like the elderly and immunocompromised should be encouraged to stay quarantined. Otherwise, the authors claimed, society should be encouraged to function normally, from schools to businesses.
--
Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden.
--
When COVID-19 restrictions became increasingly unpopular, Bhattacharya emerged as a hero to those who objected to them from the start. That said, Bhattacharya has gone beyond simply opposing lockdowns, and also advances controversial views about vaccines. By joining DeSantis' Public Health Integrity Committee .. https://www.flgov.com/2022/12/13/governor-ron-desantis-petitions-florida-supreme-court-for-statewide-grand-jury-on-covid-19-vaccines-and-announces-creation-of-the-public-health-integrity-committee/ , Bhattacharya is expressing tacit agreement with the panel's premise that "the Biden Administration and pharmaceutical corporations continue to push widespread distribution of mRNA vaccines on the public, including children as young as 6 months old, through relentless propaganda while ignoring real-life adverse events." Bhattacharya is also agreeing to work with individuals like Florida Surgeon General Joseph A. Ladapo, who has spread misinformation about mRNA vaccines. Additionally, in May he argued the data on whether COVID-19 vaccines save lives is "surprisingly nuanced" and that it led him to believe "public health authorities should have recommended the cheaper adenovector vaccines over the mRNA vaccines all along for most patients."
In any case, Bhattacharya's opinions about the mRNA COVID vaccines might well be characterized as health misinformation. The World Health Organization agrees .. https://www.who.int/news/item/17-05-2022-statement-for-healthcare-professionals-how-covid-19-vaccines-are-regulated-for-safety-and-effectiveness .. that all forms of COVID-19 vaccines are both safe and effective. Moreover, the number of "real-life adverse events" were minimal and consistent with other vaccines for other viruses. Similarly, COVID-19 booster shots do not have worse side effects than other vaccines .. https://www.salon.com/2022/12/11/do-19-vaccines-really-have-worse-side-effects-than-other-vaccines-heres-what-experts-say/ , despite alarmism to the contrary. Finally, scientific research shows that regions with higher percentages of vaccination in their populations consistently have lower rates of premature mortality.
"The most important predictor of life expectancy loss in a large analysis performed in late 2022 across most European countries, the United States, and Chile seems to be lower vaccination uptake, especially in individuals over sixty years old .. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-022-01450-3 ," explained Dr. Monica Gandhi, an infectious disease doctor and professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. She added that "in the United States, excess COVID-19 mortality was fueled by the states with the lowest vaccination rates."
Gandhi also pointed out that Bhattacharya was invested in older and vulnerable people getting vaccinated for COVID-19 and that "the misinformation ban on Twitter during COVID-19 should be restricted to those who opposed COVID vaccination, especially for those most at risk of severe disease. Dr. Bhattacharya pushed for school openings in a state (California) that was 50 out of 50 in terms of school openings for our youth. This is not misinformation as most public health officials by now have acknowledged that prolonged school closures in this country did harm to our children."
"I will say that Dr. Bhattacharya certainly did not lack for media platforms on which to tout his views during the pandemic, so any argument that he was effectively silenced is ridiculous," Lessler told Salon.
Looking at the Bhattacharya controversy strictly from the perspective of its impact on the doctor's career, Dr. Justin Lessler — a professor in the Department of Epidemiology at the University of North Carolina Gillings School of Public Health — has little sympathy for his past Twitter predicament.
"I will say that Dr. Bhattacharya certainly did not lack for media platforms on which to tout his views during the pandemic, so any argument that he was effectively silenced is ridiculous," Lessler told Salon by email. "I will also say that most of his arguments about the nature of the disease from those early days have been long since proved wrong."
Salon corresponded with Bhattacharya by email in 2020 for an article about his most famous work, the Great Barrington Declaration. He insisted at the time that there is "an enormous body of evidence that documents the psychological and health harms induced by lockdown, with the poor in every poor country on earth hit the hardest."
Bhattacharya added: "Lockdowns have a sorry track record to date in protecting the vulnerable in the US, Europe, and the Americas."
When asked whether identifying and segregating the necessary proportion of the population may not be achievable for that approach to be effective, Bhattacharya replied by criticizing the experts who claimed that to be the case.
"If an expert decides that shielding the vulnerable is impossible, I'm not surprised that that expert cannot come up with good ideas to do so," Bhattacharya asserted in 2020. "There's a simple explanation: the reliance of public health folks on lockdowns to reduce community spread has stifled their natural creativity in solving problems like this." He also pointed to a number of writings by himself and his colleagues "to provide methods to protect the vulnerable (including in the text of the Great Barrington Declaration itself)."
Bhattacharya added, "I am certain that other ideas are possible, if the public health community were to put its mind to the task, rather than relying on lockdowns to protect the vulnerable. Lockdowns have a sorry track record to date in protecting the vulnerable in the US, Europe, and the Americas."
The pandemic has prompted a renewed public debate over how free speech abuts harmful misinformation, particularly in the realm of public health. Certainly, public health officials with good intentions frequently have sincere disagreements about medical policy. This happens even when there aren't major social crises simmering in the background; it is inevitable that these divisions will be exacerbated during a pandemic. The underlying issue in the debate over Bhattacharya and Twitter is about more than scientific disagreement, however; it is about the intersection of politics and science, and the delicate questions involved with properly curating a public space when pressing and polarizing issues are at stake. It is a question with no easy answers, since those who ask it must choose whether it is worse to censor potentially valid ideas in the name of public safety or allow possible misinformation to harm people in the name of free speech.
Salon reached out to Bhattacharya for this story. After it was published, he replied and clarified his intent with the Great Barrington Declaration as encouraging "focused protection" rather than herd immunity, asking for the phrase "herd immunity" to be replaced in one sentence. He did not reply to any of Salon's other questions.
This story was updated on December 16, 2022 at 2:00 PM ET
https://www.salon.com/2022/12/16/why-elon-musk-and-right-wing-pundits-are-cheering-a-doctor-with-questionable-vaccine-views/
Motherfu... pic.twitter.com/VDsWInmUyD
— Walmart Battle Orc (@ASo1omons) June 27, 2023
DDF - Still HUGE: VACCINES KILL HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS A WEEK! - GOVERNMENT REPORTS
PROVE GENOCIDE!
WATCH
https://www.bitchute.com/video/u43RrVbeR78u/
Everyone that took a PCR test is probably screwed -
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172177272
https://twitter.com/i/status/1671165388372205
Great Reset or Great Awakening – Bo Polny
By Greg Hunter On June 20, 2023 In Political Analysis 3 Comments
https://usawatchdog.com/great-reset-or-great-awakening-bo-polny/
By Forced New Passports & more? - Will We Be Forced To Take Bio-Jab & Booster Jabs To Ex.
Get A New Drivers License Every So Often To We Be Killed & Murdered By The Bio-Jabs Killers???
This is why conservatives ultimately win. They are better armed.
Good price on 9's but they want almost 70 bucks for shipping ?
https://southerndefense.com/federal-champion-premium-9mm-luger-115gr-full-metal-jacket-range-and-target-ammunition/
Here comes the apology.
When are you going to "man" up and admit you were wrong?
https://slaynews.com/news/top-canadian-official-apologizes-unvaxxed-we-were-wrong/
Like you, this fraud is guilty of misinformation. How many people have been injured or dead because of lies.
American ‘Vaccine Expert’ & TV personality @PeterHotez has just absolutely DESTROYED by @elonmusk @joerogan @RobertKennedyJr on Twitter along with any remaining shred of credibility that the mRNA Covid Vaccines may have had left.
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) June 18, 2023
Here is lying Pharmaceutical sponsored shill… pic.twitter.com/mfIXLswF9c
I have no clue. Santa Anita had a spell a year or so ago.
How do you explain all the horses dying lately?
Very cool watching from the jockey's perspective. Of course that was all info I could have used two years ago.
Too bad he never got to run the Triple Crown, from what I'm reading, he was accident prone.
Flightline - one of the best of the best - truly one of my favorites
1st race broke maiden April 24th 2021
let me go find them on youtube. it's important you watch this horse
It asks me to log in the view the camera stuff.
that's cool.
did you ever watch the replays of Flightline?
click results then the camera icon
https://www.equibase.com/profiles/Results.cfm?type=Horse&refno=10425358®istry=T
Kamala would be a riot
With that said, Kamala Harris would be much worse.
Honestly, I can't think of a politician out there who would be good for the country. May as well let things go nuts with Mark Cuban or The Rock.
I don't see anything good with Trump running. well, it's drives the left bonkers
Sorry man, Trump had his shot to improve the country. Be it partially his fault and partially those who refused to work with him, it was a fail. Voting him in again would just further separate both sides and prevent anything from getting done. Don't know why you'd want that again?
I question every election result going back to 1992 (at least).
If Trump really cared about the country vs his legacy, he's just move along. They are only going after him because he wants to run again. It's going to get really ugly.
The only positive of it all is, when the government is ineffective, the stock market does well.
what a world we live in.
TRUMP: “This day will go down in infamy and Joe Biden will be forever remembered as not only the most corrupt president in the history of our country but perhaps even more importantly the president who together with a band of his closest thugs, misfits and Marxists tried to destroy American democracy.”
TRUMP: “This day will go down in infamy and Joe Biden will be forever remembered as not only the most corrupt president in the history of our country but perhaps even more importantly the president who together with a band of his closest thugs, misfits and Marxists tried to… pic.twitter.com/7AjYxuBmCL
— ALX 🇺🇸 (@alx) June 14, 2023
Getting on the rail and passing National Treasure was the key to victory. Forte almost ran him down. good race. I didn't have Arcangelo in my main bets. Only in one superfecta
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |