Newlead Holdings Ltd. (fka NEWLF)

[Top Penny]

Does anyone know if Zolotas has applied anywhere to reinstate NEWLF? He only has so long to do it.

[Top Penny]

I have Zolotas's private email but he has never once emailed me back. Talk about a guy with little to no soul, he could care less about shareholders. NEWLF looking grim here. I doubt anyone takes this ticker over when Zolotas goes to jail, it will prolly just cease trading one day in the future.

[Top Penny]

NEWLF's headquarters have been abandoned, wonder why they are keeping the website up, very interesting.

Zolotas’ lawyer had not responded to a request for comment by the time TradeWinds went to press. NewLead’s Piraeus office telephone number is temporarily disconnected, and the company appears to have vacated its Akti Miaouli offices.

[Top Penny]

Let's see if NEWLF can ever get their act together, will be interesting to see how this all plays out!

[badshah]

Need some assistance from the old timers here...

Can losses incurred in NEWL/NEWLF be used as a casualty or theft loss deductible using Form 4684 ? Does anyone know if this has been done by any investor in NEWL ?

If you have any memory that this subject has been addressed on this board, can you please point me to the relevant posts ? Thanks.

See below a reference I have successfully used to claim such a loss for two stocks in the recent past...USXP and LLEL

http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/JN/JNJournal01.nsf/c0d731e03de9828d852574580042ae7a/5c1b563d60425a978525769b00672304!OpenDocument&Highlight=0,*

The Florida Bar Journal (January, 2010 Volume 84, No. 1)
Can an Investment Become a Theft for Tax Purposes?
by Jeffrey P. Coleman and Jennifer Newsom

In this article, it states under “The Use of the IRS’s Safe Harbor for “Theft Loss” Treatment for Losses Resulting from Ponzi Schemes”

“On March 17, 2009, the IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2009-20,29 creating an optional “safe harbor” for treatment of certain investment losses as “theft losses” (think Madoff). Under this procedure, if the taxpayer elects the safe harbor, a “theft loss” is deemed to occur. The deemed theft loss, called a “qualified loss,” occurs when a taxpayer has invested in a “specified fraudulent arrangement” and one or more of the perpetrators has been criminally charged with one or more crimes that would meet the definition of “theft” for purposes of I.R.C. §165, provided certain other conditions are satisfied. This safe harbor treatment is available to losses for which the “discovery year,” as specifically defined in the procedure, is 2008 or later.

Also, under “Establishing the Loss as a “Qualified Loss”

First, to utilize the safe harbor, the taxpayer must have invested in a “specified fraudulent arrangement.” A specified fraudulent arrangement is, generally speaking, a Ponzi scheme.30

Second, to utilize the safe harbor, one or more of the perpetrators must have been charged, criminally, by indictment, information, or complaint (not withdrawn or dismissed) under state or federal law. The criminal charges, as previously mentioned, must constitute “theft” under the law of the jurisdiction in which the theft occurred, consistent with the existing case law governing this issue.31 Third, if the charges are by complaint (versus indictment or information), then one of the following three factors must also be present: 1) the complaint must allege an “admission by the lead figure,” or 2) a receiver or trustee must have been appointed for the specified fraudulent arrangement, or 3) the assets of the specified fraudulent arrangement must have been frozen.32

[Top Penny]

I just don't understand how they will ever acquire ships with almost 4 billion shares outstanding at a price of .0001? They can't finance anything with stock, not without a massive reverse split, and those ships aren't cheap, we are talking millions. Very interesting as to what will happen here.

[Top Penny]

Agreed, it's not looking good. Unless we see the company reinstated it's pretty much all she wrote.

[NewlChina]

Zolotas in to much legal trouble all over.

TransAsia case alone was enough.


Bermuda dissolving the registration may mean it might just randomly stop trading one day in the future..



Grim outlook here to be sure.

[Top Penny]

NEWLF can change that in a blink of an eye!

https://info.legalzoom.com/reopen-dissolved-company-25679.html

[Top Penny]

Yes indeed, they are a real company, if they ever recover or not that is to be seen. However it's a better bet here than most "fake" companies trading in the trips, like you said at least NEWLF is real.

[OBE]

In MAY2104 I was day-trading this-stock on-the NASDAQ

Of course, it was NEWL back then.

IN @ 1.73 OUT @ 2.26 same day 5-19-14

IN @ 2.28 OUT @ 2.48 same day 5-19-14

IN @ 1.90 OUT @ 4.59 same day 5-21-14

the r/s hit me when I had a million shares

I raised it back to a million at the new pps figuring "whatda hell!" like you say...this is a real company fallen on bad times.

I now own a million @ .0004

That's nothing even if I lose it. I made piles-of-cash on this baby!

GLTA and let's GO NEWLF!!!

[NewlChina]

Zolotas still in court on the FOCUS case.


The trial proper in the Focus case was allowed to move forward again on Monday, after Nicosia criminal court ruled – in a trial within a trial – that certain evidence introduced by the prosecution was admissible.

The defence had earlier argued that evidence obtained from Greece by Cypriot authorities was not acquired lawfully via the mutual judicial assistance protocol between the two countries. As such, they said, this evidence should not be admissible.

The evidence in question relates to Greek national Michalis Zolotas, owner of Focus Maritime Corp and a key defendant in the proceedings.

On Monday, the court rejected the defence’s motion.

By unanimous decision, the three judges said the evidence in question had been obtained lawfully from Greece via mutual judicial assistance requests made by Cypriot law enforcement authorities.

According to the court, the prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all the evidence in question was accounted for and properly documented in the mutual judicial assistance requests.

The court noted that even if the evidence had not been obtained lawfully, it would still have admitted the evidence provided it were deemed relevant to the case and provided that the defendants’ right to a fair trial were not adversely affected.

The decision allowed the prosecution to call to the witness stand CID sergeant Nicolas Foullidis, the officer in charge of the evidence related to the case.

Foullidis had begun testifying in early May, but his testimony was interrupted when the defence raised its objection to the evidence, leading to the trial within a trial.

On Monday, the defence objected anew when Foullidis tried to introduce as evidence a digital disk containing evidence.

The CD was obtained from the Sovereign Base Areas, the court was told.

The defence argued that the CD was not obtained lawfully.

As such, the proceedings were interrupted, and will resume on September 7.

Prosecutors claim that Focus Maritime Corp was the conduit for transferring €1m to a consultancy firm in Cyprus.

The consultancy firm was owned by the daughter of then governor of the Central Bank Christodoulos Christodoulou. The prosecution’s case rests on the premise that the money was a sweetener to Christodoulou so he would green-light the 2006 takeover of Laiki Bank by Greek financier Andreas Vgenopoulos, now deceased.

Laiki was shuttered in 2013.

Vgenopoulos, chairman of Marfin Investment Group (MIG), was initially also on the charge sheet. His name was withdrawn when he died in November 2016.

In addition to Zolotas and Christodoulou, defendants in the same case are Christodoulou’s daughter Athina, her ex-husband Andreas Kizourides, former Laiki official Michael Fole, and ?C Christodoulou Consultants Ltd, MIG and Focus as legal entities.

In a related issue, state attorney Andreas Aristides said on Monday that no evidence or documents related to the Focus case were destroyed in the fire that broke out at the Nicosia court complex back in February.

Aristides told the Cyprus News Agency that, at the time of the fire, no evidence pertaining to the case had yet been submitted to the court and therefore none of this evidence was being stored in the building.

As such, recent media reports claiming that Focus-related evidence was destroyed, were inaccurate.

https://cyprus-mail.com/2018/08/06/focus-trial-back-on-track-after-ruling-on-evidence/

[place_your_bets]

Awe shorty no want cover. want newlf go bye bye awe..newlf all over world lol imo

[place_your_bets]

The following is a list of subsidiaries of NewLead Holdings, Ltd. as of December 31, 2015.

COMPANY
SHAREHOLDER



NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD, Bermuda (formerly known as Aries Maritime Transport Limited)



DIRECT SUBSIDIARIES



NEWLEADJMEG INC., Marshall Islands


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD.


NEWLEAD MOJAVE HOLDINGS LLC, Delaware


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD.


MINES INVESTMENTS CORP., Marshall Islands


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD


Shipmanagement Companies





AMT MANAGEMENT LTD., Marshall Islands


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD.


NEWLEAD SHIPPING S.A., Panama


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD.


Sub-Holding Companies





NEWLEAD BITUMEN TANKERS LTD. , Marshall Islands


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD.


NEWLEAD BULKER HOLDINGS INC., Marshall Islands


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD.


NEWLEAD HANDIES INC., Marshall Islands


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD


Ship-Owning Companies





NEWLEAD VICTORIA LTD., Liberia, FME Marshall Islands


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD.












COMPANY


SHAREHOLDER








Companies With No Assets* ;)






NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LLC, Nevada


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD.


BRAZIL HOLDINGS LTD., Liberia


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD.


BORA LIMITED, British Virgin Islands


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD.


COMPASS OVERSEAS LTD., Bermuda


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD.


GRAND VICTORIA PTE. LTD., Singapore


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD.


OCEAN HOPE SHIPPING LIMITED, Malta


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS LTD.




INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES









NEWLEAD SHIPPING LLC, Nevada


NEWLEAD SHIPPING S.A.



NEWLEAD HOLDINGS (US) CORP., Delaware (formerly known as NewLead Holdings (US) LLC)





NEWLEAD MOJAVE HOLDINGS LLC.



NEW LEAD JMEG LLC., Delaware


NEWLEAD HOLDINGS (US) CORP.



MINE INVESTMENTS LLC, Delaware





MINES INVESTMENTS CORP.



FIVE MILE INVESTMENT LLC, Delaware





MINE INVESTMENTS LLC



ELK VALLEY INVESTMENT LLC, Delaware





MINE INVESTMENTS LLC



VIKING ACQUISITION GROUP LLC, Kentucky





MINE INVESTMENTS LLC



COAL ESSENCE PREP PLANT LLC, Kentucky





MINE INVESTMENTS LLC



NEWLEAD BULKERS LLC, Nevada





NEWLEAD BULKERS S.A.



Ship-Owning Companies









NEWLEAD CASTELLANO LTD., Liberia


NEWLEAD HANDIES INC.



NEPHELI MARINE COMPANY, Liberia


NEWLEAD BITUMEN TANKERS LTD



KASTRO COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A., Liberia


NEWLEAD BITUMEN TANKERS LTD.



AEOLUS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A., Liberia


NEWLEAD BITUMEN TANKERS LTD.



Mine-Owning Companies









COAL ESSENCE MINE LLC, Kentucky





VIKING ACQUISITION GROUP LLC











Wash Plant-Owning Companies









VIKING PREP PLANT LLC, Kentucky





COAL ESSENCE PREP PLANT LLC



Ship Management Companies









NEWLEAD BULKERS S.A.


NEWLEAD SHIPPING S.A.



Bareboat Charter Companies



NEWLEAD ALBION S.A., Marshall Islands, FME Liberia


NEWLEAD HANDIES INC.



NEWLEAD VENETICO LTD., Marshall Islands, FME Liberia


NEWLEAD HANDIES INC.



NEWLEAD SOLTERO INC., Marshall Islands


NEWLEAD BITUMEN TANKERS LTD.



NEWLEAD SEMILLERO INC., Marshall Islands


NEWLEAD BITUMEN TANKERS LTD.









COMPANY





SHAREHOLDER









Shipping Companies with no assets *







GRAND MARKELA INC., Liberia





NEWLEAD BULKER HOLDINGS INC.

NEWLEAD GRANADINO INC., Marshall Islands


NEWLEAD BITUMEN TANKERS LTD

NEWLEAD SILLETERO INC., Marshall Islands


NEWLEAD BITUMEN TANKERSLTD.

NEWLEAD HOJUEDO INC., Marshall Islands


NEWLEAD BITUMEN TANKERS LTD.

TRANS STATE NAVIGATION LTD., Malta


OCEAN HOPE SHIPPING LIMITED

TRANS CONTININENT NAVIGATION LTD., Malta





OCEAN HOPE SHIPPING LIMITED.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1322587/000143774916032788/ex8-1.htm

[place_your_bets]

Better cover shorty! Bermuda is just an address like a po box lol imo

NewLead Holdings Ltd. Subsidiaries
Challenger Enterprises Ltd.
AMT Management Ltd.
Mine Investments LLC
Mote Shipping Ltd
Bethune Properties S.A
Compass Overseas Ltd.
Challenger Enterprises, Inc.
Australia Holdings Ltd.
Newlead Ship Management Ltd.
Newlead Bulker Holdings Inc
Altius Marine S.a.
China Holdings Ltd.
Crusader Enterprises Ltd
Chinook Waves Corporation

Compassion Overseas Ltd.
Newlead Victoria Ltd
Jubilee Ship holding S.A
Ostria Waves Ltd.
Grand Rodosi Inc
Ayasha Trading Corporation
Seine Marine Ltd.
Rider Marine S.a
Brazil Holdings Ltd
Grand Markela Inc
Makassar Marine Ltd
Land Marine S.A
Grand Oceanos Inc
NewLead Holdings (US) Corp.
Fortius Marine S.a.
Trans State Navigation Ltd


https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1322587/000143774916032788/ex8-1.htm



https://www.google.com/search?q=newlead+holdings+ltd+subsidiaries&source=lnt&tbs=qdr:y&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7koWUgtncAhVQhOAKHf6FAoE4ChCnBQgf&biw=1200&bih=551

[NewlChina]

Thus ends Newlead...?

I wonder what happens to the TransAsia judgement then.

[GaryJPalys]

$NEWLF has been dissolved by the Bermuda Government. I notified the Trading and Markets division of the SEC and asked why it is still trading!

[place_your_bets]

LONG AND NEVER SHORT!! $$$$$

[place_your_bets]

NEWLF----KABOOOOOM \imo

[Top Penny]

Interesting to see how this will all play out. Can't believe this isn't at no bid again. Holding strong.

[place_your_bets]

NEWLF Shorty feeling the heat lol

[TransAsia Judgment]

Where's the rally

[NewlChina]

Considering this article:

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141082096

I don't know how much there is actually "left" of Newlead at this point.

The only sign of life is that they do have a lawfirm representing them in the NY case right now..so funds have to be coming from somewhere.



Until different it's just a dark ticker under a legal judgement. Not worth more then 0.0001 x 0.0002

[place_your_bets]

Shorty def better cover here!

[place_your_bets]

Clearing Rules Could Mean Short Cover Rally in Some Microcap
April 16, 2018 Tom Bustamante


Share this article above

(NEW YORK)–New clearing rules imposed by Alpine Securities last week could spell the end of the “toxic note” scourge, and possibly mean a short-term short cover rally in the most beating down issues.

Alpine Securities, which is one of the last clearing firms to clear shares in small micro-cap issues, imposed new rules Friday on clearing shares to market that some have labeled the “Friday the 13th of Notes Massacre“.

Alpine joined the likes of COR Clearing to impose new rules that all but kills the toxic note industry. In short the new rules as we see them is no note conversion deposits will be accepted for issues that trade below $0.01 per share, and may not exceed 20% of the previous 20-day volume average in the stock in question.

This new rule will be a big move in killing the toxic note industry that has destroyed so many micro cap issues over the past few years. But short-term some micro cap plays could see their stocks rise in what they call short covering rallies.

Some note holder shorted the issues they were funding knowing they could always use the conversions of the notes they hold to cover any short positions on the way down. Now this may only be a small % of funders who did this execution, but if notes are no longer able to be cleared like before these shorters, or market makers, will be required to cover said positions with their own cash now, or risk major losses.

Short-term this is a very positive move for micro cap issues as this may remove extreme selling pressure in some of these issues. For shareholders this is even a bigger win as this will now control the level of sharp dilution growth in any one issue over a set period of time.

Longer-term though this could be a real death nail for some smaller micro cap issues as this will all but dry up emergency funding sources for this sector, and could mean a total revamp of how these small stocks fund themselves.

Stay tuned and register for updates cause this is a developing story!


http://www.wallstreetnewscast.com/microcap-0416/

[TransAsia Judgment]

Yes very interesting - no access to SEC Filings

no access to Historical NEWL Stock information
no annual reports

wow

[NewlChina]

Dark ticker.. I don't think they have anything to share with us.

On the court side they have posted a few documents for the month of June...


I noticed on their webpage the investor relations page no longer works. It just says "Error on Page"..


Error on page indeed Newlead

[Polo08]

Wats going on

[place_your_bets]

NEWLF shorty better cover soon imo!!

[TransAsia Judgment]

Seems Place your bets has gone radio silent
My apologies but the truth always hurts
You were found out !!

[Polo08]

Deftrader wat u talking about TransAsia is going to get asset from newlf which would be the company u need do some more home work its in black and white

[DeafTrader2]

NEWLF will become no trade soon.


GREY MARKET From OTC TICKER


R.I.P.

[USS Pandemonium]

You are correct in that it went dark some time ago. In fact, at the very same time, I could not even place a sell order through my own brokerage house just for the simple sake of eating the loss and offloading the remaining shares that I was stuck with. I was just trying to remove the ugly from my portfolio... like who wants to be reminded everytime they scroll past that and onto something else? Anyway, I figured those shares would eventually disappear along with the removal of NEWL’s ticker symbol from the exchange. However, that removal never occurred. At the time, I also entertained the idea of placing a buy order, just to absorb the full paper value of the remaining DARK company’s shares at less than $2,000. But the brokerage house would not allow me to purchase those during NEWL’s dark age either. However, some time ago (maybe 10 months or more) the ticker switched to NEWLF, and shares of this company became buyable and sellable, again.

So.. However that happens at a time when such a company has disappeared among the Greys, I remain uncertain. But I did take that as an indicator that somebody kept this company alive. Why on Earth anyone else would’ve done that still beats the $hit out of me. But to this day, and maybe I’m wrong, I suspect that it was either Zolotas returning to the scene of his crime (LOL!) or TransAsia securing what now appears could be necessary for their own recovery. I really don’t know any other way how the authorities could’ve caught Zolotas. But with names such as Mark ‘Lucky’ Burdon [arranged in any order] for a business partner, I mean.. the dumba$$ may as well have used Bernie Madoff, had that name not already been taken. This is just great entertainment at this point. But yeah, I don’t believe a brokerage house is legally allowed to fill buy and sell orders for shares of DARK company stock. One pretty much has to hit the pavement and physically meetup with the Devil in order for that type of exchange/transfer to occur. I could be wrong though as regulations get lifted more often than they are applied.

[Polo08]

We should be getting some news sone

[USS Pandemonium]

Based on the number of Authorized shares for issuance, i.e. 50,000,000,000
the Market Cap of this company at 0.0002 pps should register at $10-M.
At 0.0001 pps, the Market Cap should register at $5-M.

Since TransAsia has been awarded a $22-M judgement, and if they only recover 1/3 of that amount through insurance, assett seizure and liquidation, that still leaves TransAsia needing to recover $14.66-M.

I suppose anywhere between $5-M and $10-M of that amount may come from the Market Cap of this assett. (Current value?) But that still leaves TransAsia short another $4.66-M in recovery of the fully-awarded settlement. However, Should the pps of this stock rise to 0.0002932 (0.0003) rounded-up, then sure, there’s enough to liquidate it. Just one problem, however: Who’s actually going to buy at 0.0003 with 100% of the authorized shares for issuance - outstanding?
Maybe TransAsia will via another counterparty.
But that party is going to have to do something more with this ticker, just to recover their own 0.0003 pps in addition to every other marketing expense that goes into pumping this thing back up.

As-is, the paper value of this stock is already undervalued based on January 2018’s Market Cap and its current Market Cap, the authorized amount of its shares for issuance and its # of shares outstanding.
With all of the above in mind, it isn’t a far fetched roll of the dice to assume that the new owners of NEWLF (TransAsia) via court award are very likely to give up on this assett now, just to “let-it-go”. I find it hard to believe that TransAsia even made it this far in pursuing something that has already been deemed by every other long and short position as being so grey, dilluted and worthless for years, now. It might just behoove TransAsia to turn this defunct company around. All the market conditions appear to be in accordance with doing so. If nothing else, it’ll still be intriguing to watch whatever TransAsia decides to do with this company (ticker symbol) if anything amidst all of the other tickers currently registered and listed on the same exchange.

[NewlChina]

Argument is invalid...

Please read Transcript of proceedings Doc Number #726 in the NY case that addressed EXACTLY this issue with the judge.

[NewlChina]

TransAsia is not taking over this ticker.

Newlead is DARK, prior to going dark you can read their last 20-F, this company was loaded to the gills with debt, various articles have pointed to all their ships being seized by creditors.


The TransAsia judgement is just another sign of incompetence considering years ago TransAsia wanted $1-2mil to be made whole..instead Newlead dragged it on to a $20M claim somehow.


Zolotas does not care about Newlead Shareholders, since the Nickel wire incident in 2013, DELISTING in 2014 and the final blow of the NT 20-F in 2016..


In fact a few months ago they didn't even pay the money to host their website anymore, it was down for like a week before somebody noticed and paid the bill.


worthless ticker since 2013!

[USS Pandemonium]

That should add at least $500 to $1,000 to their Market Cap. Still, I wonder where that’ll go.

[USS Pandemonium]

In my opinion, if they’ve seized the company and there are no other assetts, and if the liquidation of Zolotas’ assetts can’t even cover restitution, then there is only one way to recover the difference of the total sum of the claim. Here’s to hoping for a new ticker symbol and a very low # of shares outstanding : authorized. Perhaps the courts will issue a lien in the amount of awarded judgement (could be used for Market Cap) and Zolotas can be stuck with footing the bill for his own bond. It would be preferable if business could now go on w/o that worthless p.o.s.

[Polo08]

I think am going to buy 5 mill 2moro and sit on it

[Top Penny]

They would of have to announced a share buyback, there is no share buyback here.

[USS Pandemonium]

BINGO! lol

[Polo08]

I think that this is going to take off this week and it's going to hit 0.001 this week

[Polo08]

I think that by the end of this week this might take a run to 0.001

[Polo08]

I think that this is going to make a good run now

[Polo08]

Is there any news about Transasia and wat there going to do with newlf stocks

[TransAsia Judgment]

You really have me confused? I must be stupid
Can u look up the name change - I am not seeing what you are talking about

I see a name change from "TransAsia Commodities Investment Corp Ltd" to "TransAsia Commodities Investment Ltd" - Corp was removed - That is normal nothing unusal - nothing there to say it is in liquidation!!


If I can get my head around all the confusion:

We were talking of the company in liquidation which is "TransAsia Commodities Ltd" - but the judgment is in favour of TransAsia Commodities Investment Ltd". Yes - "TransAsia Commodities Ltd" is in liquidation - I accept that - but it is a different company!

The company "TransAsia Commodities Investment Ltd" was awarded the judgment.
If I look at the name change the company changed its name removing the "Corp" - probably to shorten name - corporation and limited is sort of the same!

Do not understand what you are up in arms about?

[place_your_bets]

you check linkedin and I check the Gov official websites LOL... SMH NEWLEADS needs to call the Judge! imo

Nope same company its changed its name in 2014 to the name you mention after the alleged fraud they claim happend.

so they are suing with a new name after the fact. and changed it to reflect they are in the commodities business then they were in liquidation from the previous company back in 2013. lol imo

TransAsia's claims arose from contracts it signed with NewLead JMEG in 2013 for the purchase of coal which, according to court documents, NewLead never owned from mines it also did not own.

The documents of them changing their name to a NEW! company name. so they arent entitle to sue anyone! imo I would call the Judge lol

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/09227369/filing-history

https://tinyurl.com/namechange-Trans-asia2014 document pics

https://tinyurl.com/namechange-Transasia2014-doc (the new company CREATED AFTER the so called contracts with newleads and co. so whatis a NEW company doing suing if they werent even created till after the fact lol imo_)


Fraud imo

[place_your_bets]

Nope same company its changed its name in 2014 to the name you mention after the alleged fraud they claim happend.

so they are suing with a new name after the fact. and changed it to reflect they are in the commodities business then they were in liquidation from the previous company back in 2013. lol imo

TransAsia's claims arose from contracts it signed with NewLead JMEG in 2013 for the purchase of coal which, according to court documents, NewLead never owned from mines it also did not own.

The documents of them changing their name to a NEW! company name. so they arent entitle to sue anyone! imo I would call the Judge lol

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/09227369/filing-history

https://tinyurl.com/namechange-Trans-asia2014 document pics

https://tinyurl.com/namechange-Transasia2014-doc (the new company CREATED AFTER the so called contracts with newleads and co. so whatis a NEW company doing suing if they werent even created till after the fact lol imo_)

[TransAsia Judgment]

I checked LinkedIn Profile of TransAsia CEO

https://www.linkedin.com/in/serge-turko-83732417/

There is an interesting articles on Zolotas refers to Tradewinds
At the bottom is a contact details - thinking of emailing

It reads at the bottom:
Contact Details: [e-mail]

Maybe people should reach out - who knows would not hurt!