Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Netlist Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (8:20-cv-00993)
District Court, C.D. California
551 May 17, 2024 Main Document Jury Trial - Completed
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17206527/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
Stokd $NLST FYI—writer of article is unaware or hasn't factored Netlist 303mil win over Samsung in 463 case... Samsung is unlicensed!
'Netlist Triumphs Over Samsung in Breach of Contract Case'
"In a decisive verdict announced on Friday, a Los Angeles-based federal jury has sided with chipmaker Netlist, identifying a material breach of contract by tech giant Samsung. This breach involved Samsung halting the supply of essential memory products that were under contract with Netlist."
"The case adds a new chapter in the ongoing multi-jurisdictional patent dispute involving the two companies."
"By establishing that a material breach occurred, Netlist reinforces its position within the larger patent conflict with Samsung."
"A legal victory of this nature, even without immediate financial compensation, can offer several potential advantages to Netlist. It supports Netlist’s reputational standing as a company capable of defending its legal rights against a larger industry player."
https://smartphonemagazine.nl/en/2024/05/17/netlist-triumphs-over-samsung-in-breach-of-contract-case/
NLST 🔥NEWS JUST OUT!!!🔥 'BREAKING: Calif. Jury Finds Samsung Breached Contract With Netlist'
"A Los Angeles federal jury found on Friday that Samsung materially breached its contract with chipmaker Netlist by cutting off its supply of crucial memory products, delivering a significant win for Netlist in its multi-jurisdictional patent fight with Samsung even though no monetary damages were at stake."
https://www.law360.com/articles/1838582
sorry i dont have access
very nice !!! waiting for details!!!
9mm shorts out there! HOLD, HOLD, HOLD!
today should be the final day, stay hopeful !!
Next week NLST starts to destroy Micron.. I've waited so long for this , the BOC win was the opening to beating GOOG and Micron in mho.....
Back
Stokd
5m
$NLST Jury worked through lunch and have a verdict…
WE WON!!! 🔥🔥🔥
Jury agreed with Netlist interpretation of Sec 6.2 and breach was meterial.
Bullish
10
1
67
Back
Stokd
5m
$NLST Jury worked through lunch and have a verdict…
WE WON!!! 🔥🔥🔥
Jury agreed with Netlist interpretation of Sec 6.2 and breach was meterial.
Bullish
10
1
67
have a great wkend everyone monday is going to be awsome
I’m sure they want this verdict done
Just refreshing my screen to see news in verdict .. lol. I’ve seen from .10 to $10. Haven’t sold, just bought during the times.
Couldn't stop myself, had to
https://tenor.com/view/volleyball-beach-mexico-bikini-ass-gif-5817796
Hope NLST can gett'er done..... finally.
That is awesome that a decision will be made here.
Hope all parties can live with the decision of a jury. Long Long case.
This could be very interesting!
Thank you.
We are waiting for the verdic the jury is out deliberating
Do we know how many days have been scheduled for the trial?
My apologizes, haven't done any research, however had followed the ITC case.
Price is acting like we win $1.48x$1.49
NLST Here is today's schedule. Court starts in less than 30 minutes...
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573347150.jpg
TOMKiLA
2m
$NLST POSSIBLE MICRON DAMAGES!!
Kennedy damages discussion for micron 1 $23.42 per unit for micron 2 $46.70 incremental royalty rate of $70.12 the proposed royalty rate was $89.24 but it looks like Kennedy settled on the $70.12. I think all those numbers will make everyone very happy because if you remember we ended up with about three quarters of Kennedy's estimate during the Samsung case
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573335113.png
Ex parte applications are solely for extraordinary relief and are rarely granted.
https://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/honorable-mark-c-scarsi
EX PARTE APPLICATIONS:
Ex parte applications are solely for extraordinary relief and are rarely granted. See Mission Power Eng’g Co. v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 883 F. Supp. 488 (C.D. Cal. 1995). All ex parte applications must be sent in PDF version to mcs_chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov(link sends e-mail) along with a Word version of the proposed order. Both the e-mail to the Court and the application should advise whether opposing counsel will be filing an opposition. Ex parte applications that fail to conform to Local Rule 7-19, including a statement of opposing counsel’s position, will not be considered, except on a specific showing of good cause.
Counsel for the applicant must provide advance notice of the application by telephone and email to all other parties. In addition to the information required by Local Rule 7-19.1, the notice must advise the other parties of the anticipated deadline to oppose the application. The applicant must serve the application by facsimile, email, or personal service, even if electronic service is effected under Local Rule 5-3.2.1.
Oppositions to ex parte applications must be filed within 24 hours of the filing of the application, subject to Rule 6(a)(2). If an opposing party does not intend to oppose the ex parte application, counsel must inform the Courtroom Deputy Clerk by telephone or email as soon as possible.
as far as i know today is the final day.
So if we win the boc trial then what’s next? Do we get last year’s jury award of $303M plus ongoing license money from that point? Or, does Sammy appeal the case and it’s accepted by the judge since the PTAB invalided NLTS’s patents?
There is court today correct!
i hear ya on that. hopefully by the end of the day. somethings got to renew my sense of balance !!!
funny how we are so sure of things then when waiting for verdict you start to wonder lol
g/l NLST longs
all quiet this morning, didnt see anything on yesterdays court action.
vidal is so fos.... Vidal Addresses ‘Patent Examiner’ Reddit Issue with USPTO Personnel
https://ipwatchdog.com/2024/05/16/vidal-officially-responds-patent-examiner-reddit-issue/id=176569/
yup, their well done now, but we wanna get them crispy lol !!!
i have no idea how there going to proceed, but i'm dam sure gilstrap isnt going to let them use a vidal ptab defense or even reference ptab in any testimony or arguments.
A board will be nesassary going forward if we win against samsung as then we have google by the both testies as they are stating they have a liscence through samsung. Once we know google pretty much pooched then we know a board will not over rule hong and settle for measly pennies. Gotta rake the big dogs over the coals to prove a point at this stage in the game
Does that mean they won't argue invalidity anymore? Or they will refer to Ptab as final decision and there is nothing to defend anymore ?
Bring on the board and Nasdaq . Let's get this PPS moving upwards.
agree and I'm hoping HONG does as soon as we me the Nasdaq requirements
Oops, you just aggravated jet again. He is against a BOD and seems not to mind a PPS that is embarrassing.
Bring on the board and Nasdaq . Let's get this PPS moving upwards.
I completely agree and if NLST had a board I'm sure they would agree also.
I've learned that also. Can't handle someone else who disagrees with him about NLST and others. Everybody should have an open mind and be able to express how they would like to see NLST go forward with their investments.
Oh well....
Well sure we disagree and still get along thats the way it should be, I didn't realise that Jet couldn't handle having someone disagree with him but it became obvious with his pm to me lol..
wouldnt it be great if we get a verdict today ????? https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573257853.jpg
Samsung wants sanctions against Netlist about ONE document that Netlist wanted to put on record in the court yesterday. The Samsung attorney droned on and on about Netlist Mr Park making up a name for Netlist end customers for 100,000 unit orders they wanted to place, trying to make himappear that he was a liar. Mr Park said Mr Knuth from Samung told him to make up a name so he could process the orders. This conversation is the conversation I've put here first. The 3 documents I'll put in the comments is the Redirect Examination from Mt Harbour, Netlist attorney, where he wants to introduce Mr Parks notes from his conversations with Mr Knuth from Samsung. Samsung is mad Mr Park made notes, they weren't counting on that. Samsungs lawyer ask Park on this front page "You see any reference here to Mr. Knuth saying he wants you to give him a story?" WELL, the notes he made does. That's why you take notes!
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573257797.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573257836.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573258028.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573258185.jpg
https://stocktwits.com/Durango24k/message/573257797
You should never be sorry for your opinion. Your opinion is not wasting time nor space. There are a lot of people here that agree with you about Gail and her excessive free shares, especially with the PPS so obscenely low. Neither HOG or Gail should get freebies until we SHers get some valve for our investment. If someone doesn't like what you said, they can go complain on their other trolling site. Your opinion is always valued here, even when we disagree. Which we have before.
for the record I removed my posts, sorry I have a different opinion than jet does but I shouldn't wasted time nor space here with it.
nlst get some
I must be upsetting by your pm to me huh the vulgarity really ads a nice touch lol sorry I upset you.
I must be upsetting by your pm to me huh the vulgarity really ads a nice touch lol sorry I upset you.
Who said any different?
and one more thing as a share holder it is my bussiness to know whats happening with the shares of this company.
Who said any different?
I do not know her financial situation, so I do not know if she has to sell the shares. None of my business - or anyone else's for that matter.
ahh I think you said it
No one said you don't have the right to your opinion.
Maybe you should write the company and express your displeasure. Threaten to sell your shares. Tell her you think she's doing a disservice to the other loyal shareholders.
Maybe you should chill alittle.
NLST Micron's answer to Judge Gilstrap's deadline Equitable Defences, Prior Art, etc. This is for the 294 case in Texas stating Monday.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_573249417.jpg
294..........123 May 16, 2024
NOTICE Defendants' Updated Notice of Final Election of Invalidity Theories, Prior Art References/Combinations, and Equitable Defenses by MICRON TECHNOLOGY TEXAS, LLC, Micron Semiconductor Products Inc, Micron Technology Inc re 120 Order (Rueckheim, Michael) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
Main Document
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861663/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-texas-llc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
Followers
|
307
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
14
|
Posts (Total)
|
25993
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators papaphilip gdog 100lbStriper Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs |
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote:
https://netlist.com/
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |